So, basically, apart from the Russian vehicles, all the rest are just Oerlikon guns mounted on different chassis...
@dzban02
4 жыл бұрын
And china but yea
@imrekalman9044
4 жыл бұрын
Half the video was about the Gepard and it's copies.
@Nature31
3 жыл бұрын
and still it looks the most badass!
@yukito8148
3 жыл бұрын
in a nutshell, yes
@emanfotostudio3722
3 жыл бұрын
different radar n sensor
@kylebieth3678
4 жыл бұрын
Why would you deny us the sound of these beasts??
@agagrawang1459
3 жыл бұрын
This is a must for multiple layer of defence and with mountains and hilly terrain. Also good for an ambush for low flying air vehicles
@pavengovender4753
4 жыл бұрын
For sheer killing power and reliability , one cannot go past the ZU-23/4 Shilka. It has been used in numerous , conflicts since the 1970's and is still going strong. Such is the utility of the ZU-23/2 gun , that it is still mounted on trucks , pickups or MTLB carriers and used as a fire-support and AA weapon. It should be top of the list.
@sameerthakur720
4 жыл бұрын
But you can't always control who how many rounds are fired.
@ArctrooperHavoc
2 жыл бұрын
It's also outdated doesn't have good defense against AGM and it doesn't keep a low profile making it an easy spot easy kill
@donaldlang95
4 жыл бұрын
As a former PFC in a Missile Battery in the Royal Danish Arme, my battery had hoped tthat we could exchang our man carried missiles for the GEPARD. So that is still my no. one.
@jantschierschky3461
3 жыл бұрын
Missiles ? For roland maybe
@psychiatry-is-eugenics
3 жыл бұрын
1:31
@thebirbestbirb
3 жыл бұрын
the way he said gerpard hurt me it was so off of it
@watermirror
3 жыл бұрын
Those dudes who underestimate these beauties are just missile maniacs
@iwayanadrianartanugraha3214
3 жыл бұрын
thankyou for making this video. I decided to bought the tunguska for home defense
@Z_THORITY
3 жыл бұрын
Bapak kau home defense
@Beethoven1981
4 жыл бұрын
Artillery shell splinters? You mean shrapnel?
@gangstar8652
4 жыл бұрын
Erin Carson We aren't talking what the manufacturers are saying so are we? The guy narrating could till say shrapnel. In fact shrapnels not a shell type but a byproduct of the shell regardless of its warhead type.
@vecchiogufo4863
3 жыл бұрын
Shrapnel is a type of projectile, fitted with steel balls and an explosive charge to scatter them over the target, splinters are produced by explosions of usual artillery rounds, they are the piecies of shell body destroyed by explosion of the shell itself, in battlefields artillery splinters are very, very, very dangerous.
@gangstar8652
3 жыл бұрын
Erin Carson I think you've read far to much into my comment. If yo gave to go find links to try to prove an irrelevant comment then mate, you need to get out a bit more. It's took me over two months to even think about writing this. Just saying, there's a whole world out there fella ok. Be lucky"
@jantschierschky3461
3 жыл бұрын
@@gangstar8652 shrapnel is a specific shell, loaded with lead balls
@Puffballs-en2sk
3 жыл бұрын
Self propelled guns - Guns that fly like rockets by generating lift via bullets
@drakewitch
4 жыл бұрын
Just don t say "jepard" it s "gepard" hurts the ears
@A_Random_Person324
4 жыл бұрын
Gepards pronounced "Gep(Get with a p instead of t)Ard(as in car but you kno the rest)
@A_Random_Person324
4 жыл бұрын
Think so atleast.
@nuruddin1991
4 жыл бұрын
Not everyone know you language
@Amaryllis6731
4 жыл бұрын
@@nuruddin1991 But everyone that does informational videos should atleast learn the proper pronunciation for the topic they're doing.
@mEDIUMGap
4 жыл бұрын
So do Tangaska
@AG-fh8qr
3 жыл бұрын
Good and informative video. You are right that K 30 biho is the no.1 . Thank you from India🇮🇳🇮🇳❤️
@psychiatry-is-eugenics
4 жыл бұрын
Actual use - crowd control
@no898
3 жыл бұрын
Geneva convention starting to look more like a checklist
@manwithapan1294
3 жыл бұрын
@@no898 😂😂😂
@Tlrhighside209
3 жыл бұрын
That would make the Mk19 a less than lethal alternative...
@dpt6849
2 жыл бұрын
true
@daveystayn9284
3 жыл бұрын
I love anti aircraft guns for some reason
@vecchiogufo4863
3 жыл бұрын
You missed the DRACO 8x8, 76 mm, SPAAG and C-RAM sistem by Leonardo - OTO Melara.
@earleburtonjr9292
3 жыл бұрын
Wow! Can't hide from that!
@geoben1810
4 жыл бұрын
Formidable weapons. Would they be, or are they viable today against A-10s?
@bestamerica
4 жыл бұрын
hi G B... ' respect support A-10 and keep service... better against any ussr russia airplanes as ANs / HINDs / MIGs / SUs
@DOI_ARTS
4 жыл бұрын
A10 are not stealth if you want to destroy this anti aircraft weapons you must deploy scrambler jet first then brrrrrtttt
@Kalashnikov413
3 жыл бұрын
@@bestamerica even better at dogfighting with Su-35?
@bestamerica
3 жыл бұрын
@@Kalashnikov413 hi G F P... ' wrong word - dogfight -... must be right word - AIRFIGHT -... oh poooor ussr russia su-35 from su-27
@imrekalman9044
3 жыл бұрын
Some of these were designed to counter the range advantage the A-10 had over the Shilka.
@RustyDust101
Жыл бұрын
Well, this video didn't age well. Pantsyr failed in every regard whereas the 'outdated' and 'out-of-service' Gepard redefined No-fly-zones for Russian aircraft in the Ukraine. It has even been software upgraded to counter modern small drones, far more effectively and less cost intensive than using missiles.
@theroyalaustralian
4 жыл бұрын
The Marksman can do the exact same thing as I described with the Flakpanzer 1 Gepard also as a result of it's cannons
@MisteriosGloriosos922
3 жыл бұрын
Stunning video, thanks for share!!!
@Cruor34
4 жыл бұрын
I have to say as an American, it's shameful we don't have a good mobile AA weapon. It was shown multiple times in multiple wars how useful they are. They can also double as infantry support, imagine dual 35mm guns firing explosive rounds into buildings.
@michaelmaddy278
2 жыл бұрын
Last I heard there was ,2,000 M1s in storage, why can't some be used for anti air craft system with a new turret? You already have the tracked vehicle that is more powerful than the Sgt. York. Our allies have some really good system an already proven. I'm sure the could come up with a new to turret to house the guns an the radar systems. It'd be cheaper an a whole lot better than the Sgt York was an the M1 chassis could keep up with other M1s an other vehicles. But no the US would rather spend billions on useless systems than get state of the art systems that are already in use. An I'm sure an agreement could be made to license build them here.
@Cruor34
2 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmaddy278 Yeah Beyond me why they can't take an M1 hull and put a Bofors 57mm AA gun turret on it and then slap on like a bigger, longer range Stinger missile on the sides of the turret. Easy. Systems already work.
@AaronShenghao
2 жыл бұрын
You don't need one when you're on the invading side. Plus by that stage USAF and USN, two largest air forces in the world, probably already swept enemy air force.
@Cruor34
2 жыл бұрын
@@AaronShenghao They are still useful, like I said, the guns can be used as infantry support against "soft targets" (meaning anything weaker than a MBT or armored bunker) Also, drones are becoming more and more of an issue, as the war in Ukraine is showing, so we need it for that too.
@BosonCollider
Жыл бұрын
@@Cruor34 This. You want them as a defence against drones and cruise missiles. The CIWS is a bit in that direction. Imho what the US needs the most is something similar to the gun on the CV90. It can be mounted on an armored car or on a Bradley style vehicle, but a crew carrier with antidrone AA capability that can also be used against any target softer than an MBT is very useful.
@purplesue2
4 жыл бұрын
Everyone 500 to 600rds per minute Russia hold my Vodka 5,000rds per minute
@kaldirk
4 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@bestamerica
4 жыл бұрын
hi P... ' ussr russia drink too much heavy vodka and short time
@chinhooilooi3680
4 жыл бұрын
"Tunguska here!" "Where did you need us?" From C&C Generals Russian Tunguska
@chinhooilooi3680
4 жыл бұрын
@Kenes Assylov I mean C&C Genarals just a strategy game. However...russia military seriously badass
@weirdguyy3791
4 жыл бұрын
@Kenes Assylov USE MOD HAHAHAH GO TO MODDB.COM AND SEARCH CC MOD AND WONLOAD SILENT DEATH USA VS RUSSIA U HAVE TO TRY THAT MOD
@HacksignKT
3 жыл бұрын
They all are nice.
@Scorpio1351
3 жыл бұрын
"Artillery shell splinters" 🤣😂 watch out for those wooden rounds coming in! 😅😂
@damirfranzotti2762
4 жыл бұрын
SHILKA, the best gun ever!!!
@Kalashnikov413
3 жыл бұрын
Got outclassed by Tunguska
@mikaelolofsson2037
4 жыл бұрын
Swedish CV90 with the modification LVKV?? Autofire 4-5 rounds 40mm rapid fire. No shit.
@geocellfishandbottlesellio6821
4 жыл бұрын
I think that the Russian types which combine automatic cannon and SAM's are better than types which have guns alone
@franktank4360
4 жыл бұрын
And by Israel 😏...
@franktank4360
4 жыл бұрын
@Malazgirt 1071 yup 👌🏻👍🏻... :-)
@teukurajahitam8225
4 жыл бұрын
Hehe the fact Japan, Finland and Germany till now still partnership especially in military equipments, interesting
@robertwillis4061
4 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately the UK doesn't have vehicles like these. We use Javelin AAM's. We should build a vehicle like the Russian Terminator tanks, but with radar so it can do AA as well as ground fire. Use the Challenger 1 chassis's. Add some reactive armour, upgrade the engine
@13thdukeofwybourne69
3 жыл бұрын
The closest the U.K got to a modern dedicated S.P.A.G. was the Marksman. Developed by Marconi it was designed to fit on various platforms including challenger 1. Only the Fins brought it though.
@brianv1988
Жыл бұрын
Same with us but we mostly rely on our air support but there should definitely be something for closed in air support we did hav the m163 vulcan 20mm an m6 linebacker . now we use something called avenger an also shorad that can be used for air and ground it uses Hellfire missiles
@stanislavivanov5484
3 жыл бұрын
I've herad rumors, that Tunguska can split heli in half just within 1 second)
@valqueenofValhalla
3 жыл бұрын
If it can hit one unlikely of hitting a US bird or uk
@cerviplays6691
Жыл бұрын
IT’S PRONOUNCED GEE-PARD
@cerviplays6691
Жыл бұрын
And tun-goo-ska
@AnglerSeulangaMVA6891
3 жыл бұрын
What about artillary ?
@barriewright2857
4 жыл бұрын
I liked the jepard and the Russian tangusta.
@ServusIchBins
4 жыл бұрын
You didn’t write one name correct
@barriewright2857
4 жыл бұрын
@@ServusIchBins Thanks for the spelling corrections "Gepard and the tunguska" hoping for you to point out my further spelling mistakes. I am not German or Russian so i have to use what i have . 😎👍
@Eric910320
4 жыл бұрын
Gepard* 2S6 Tunguska*
@lemons1559
4 жыл бұрын
@@barriewright2857 I thought you misspelled them to sound like how Mr. Facs said them.
@SpartacusColo
4 жыл бұрын
@@ServusIchBins I tend to think it was a crack on the mispronunciation of the narrator?
@theroyalaustralian
4 жыл бұрын
The Flakpanzer 1 Gepard can fire a various range of ammunition, the 40 35mm armour piercing rounds is correct, but this weapon system can fire more then just Sabot as this is it's armour piercing round. It can also fire HEIF-T (High Explosive Incendiary Fragmentation Tracers, self destroying by the way), and HEIF-PF (High Explosive Incendiary Fragmentation Proximity Fuse) rounds. The Sadam 25 has 4 crew members, otherwise, where is the Radar Operator? Its crew consists of Driver, Commander, Radar Operator and Gunner.
@rodrigoquiroga8590
2 жыл бұрын
The best anti air artillery/drones/munition system today is the german Rheinmetall MANTIS
@ЬьььБббб
4 ай бұрын
Которая горит в Украине, уже,, Ланцет,, самонаводящийся снаряд,, краснополь,, уничтожили Западное дерьмо, на камеру. Уже сотни видео в,, Телеграмме,,.
@BLACKOMAMBO
3 жыл бұрын
The way is said JAYPERD and BUNDESWEHR YIKEESSS
@DominicTaddei
4 жыл бұрын
poor video. first point the chinese type 09 is in service and replacing type 95. second point they had four systems that were pretty much the same the gepard and its clones, they could have mention all four systems as one system on this list. thy could have included the chinese LD-2000 a SP 35mm gattling type weapon, its also mounted on another system the ZBL-08. they should have mentioned the ZSU-23-4 upgraded versions with added missiles. could have mentioned USA M163 VADS, also the serbian PASARS-16 armed with a 40mm bofors + missiles either mistral or R-13M vympel. also a mention of ZU-23-2 mountd on various platforms with upgrades such as radar guidance, upgraded fire control systems etc + added missiles such as Igla, strela-10M, or grom, such a system called the Hibneryt-KG of polish design. Russia has mounted these systems on MT-LB but could easily mount it on BMP-2 or BMP-3 chassis even mount it on BTR-80/82. even Egypt did a couple of versions of the ZU-23-2 called Nile-23/Sinai-23. so instead of having four systems the same they had plenty to choose from and to be honest some of these systems are better than some that made it onto their list
@joshuajacobson8397
2 жыл бұрын
May come into play at some point.
@megashaz10
4 жыл бұрын
K30 Biho is my choice
@burdidoyburdigoy8134
2 жыл бұрын
This is why no Zombie apocalypse will ever happen! Can you even imagine what this weapons system will do if it be used against the zombie horde.
@tunggulsujarwob.archmba7751
4 жыл бұрын
Ads in youtube insanely getting intens. Who will pay those with data paid? Million of viewers? I know i wont.
@Mr_Roomba_
2 жыл бұрын
6:39 yay the Tunguska is in the video
@cpgermany4583
4 жыл бұрын
Gepard is a beast.
@dimievers5573
3 жыл бұрын
the dutch PRTL is like the gepard but has in my opinion a better radar system
@matink.1865
3 жыл бұрын
I like the American and the German ones the most
@michellaeharmsen4084
3 жыл бұрын
A-10 warthog: Anti air? sorry what? *laughs in titanium armour*
@theroyalaustralian
4 жыл бұрын
The Loara also fires the exact same rounds as the Flakpanzer 1 Gepard. Reason? Well, you get the idea.
@franktank4360
4 жыл бұрын
That's what allies do yo...
@mariannepompa4152
3 жыл бұрын
MANTIS - the German anti-aircraft weapon system. A 35mm revolver cannon
@Randomynous01
3 жыл бұрын
Please be clear for every one which country manufactured it
@nervsouly
3 жыл бұрын
Do those systems work against modern armed drones?
@vladimirgusar4468
3 жыл бұрын
Most do, yes.
@nervsouly
3 жыл бұрын
@@vladimirgusar4468 okay good to know. How these drones made Aserbaidschan win so swiftly was really scary.
@vladimirgusar4468
3 жыл бұрын
@@nervsouly Sadly Armenia don't have them, or any modern ones... Didn't ask Russia for help either. I don't know what's the deal there. Perhaps they wanted a shot at nato or something. idk. Look at the armament of Armenia, it's a bit sad, while Turkey is helping Azerbaijan with modern weapons.
@nervsouly
3 жыл бұрын
@@vladimirgusar4468 yeah I guess history repeats itself. Many nations got obliterated because they failed to recognize the importance of a new technology or type of warfare.
@Weetbix1969
4 жыл бұрын
so where is the M163 the link image shows? couldn't see it anywhere in vid
@chicagobulls5436
4 жыл бұрын
Too "VADS", I mean too bad the M163 didn't make it on the list, thats why the uploader has got it presented a salute just by putting it as the thumbnail.
@franktank4360
4 жыл бұрын
Doesn't matter. If the KZitemr has post it on thumbnail in this case the M163 Vulcan then he, she needs to post it on vid in fact. It should also be the top 3 from either 3, 2 or 1...
@imrekalman9044
4 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 Was withdrawn from US service decades ago. Got an honourable mention as thumbnail.
@ДмитрийКрамаренко-т7е
4 жыл бұрын
The author, what kind of music plays in this video? Tell me please.
@SCUBAelement-Intl
4 жыл бұрын
I don't know what the track name is but I think the artist is Resonance.
@iceberg789
4 жыл бұрын
can these kill incoming cannon / rocket shells ?
@markbrisec3972
4 жыл бұрын
Of course not... They can't even take out JDAMs and SDB I and II bombs.. You need something much more sofisticated to take out rocket artillery shells, something like Iron Dome which is a bit more advanced than 2 or 4 pointing 30mm guns.
@iceberg789
4 жыл бұрын
@@markbrisec3972 need ciws i guess.
@imrekalman9044
4 жыл бұрын
@@iceberg789 These are CIWSs in essence, but since these are deployed on tracks and not ships these are called SPAAG. For example the original Kashtan CIWS used the same missiles and most of the systems of the Tunguska, even more true for the Pantsir-M CIWS and the Pantsir S1. Pantsir systems defending the Russian airbase in Latakia/Syria were quite busy for a while, in two years 2017-2019 repelled over 130 attacks from the Idlib terrorists, various drones and rockets. I only saw picture of one damaged aircraft (Su-24), and even that didn't look like a combat damage. Needless to say you can't hear about it in western media.
@incredibleindian2683
4 жыл бұрын
South Korean , Biho anti aircraft system is best in d world 💪💪💪💪
@nellzkie8238
4 жыл бұрын
Ediot
@deepurajpoot4990
3 жыл бұрын
Korian selfperpoid gun good 👍👍
@Majk314
3 жыл бұрын
Nice stroke you got there
@DimitriYar
10 ай бұрын
Music in the backgroud ?
@masudhossain5250
3 жыл бұрын
My favourite choice pantsair gun
@hermanbruner9406
Жыл бұрын
0:2:20 that's not PZG-95 I THINK is Polish Loara on PT-91 CHASE pr type 97 JSDF
@cm-pr2ys
4 жыл бұрын
First principle of anti aircraft warfare is volume, not accuracy 😁
@tembot6363
4 жыл бұрын
That is a contradiction....... Even if you have the volume of putting 1 million rounds in tge air but without hitting because of inaccuracy its still nothing.... Volume is nothing without accuracy,. ....and volume is not needed if it is accurate! Mantra of AAA defence!!
@anewstarttoabrokenlife8662
4 жыл бұрын
@@tembot6363 traditionally speaking AA was about peppering the target because accurate fire wasnt as easy. As accuracy increased the rate of fire can be lowered but even today air defense systems use high rate of fire and precision.
@majungasaurusaaaa
4 жыл бұрын
@@tembot6363 Most AA gun systems do not hit and destroy enemy aircrafts. Their main purpose is to disrupt the aircraft's aim. Accuracy is very low on the totem pole.
@tembot6363
4 жыл бұрын
@@anewstarttoabrokenlife8662 right bro
@tembot6363
4 жыл бұрын
@@majungasaurusaaaa brother , the main purpose of anti aircraft artillery is just it , to destroy aircraft , thats the very purpose of the system ..........IT SO HAPPENS THEY DISRUPT THEIR AIM IN THE PROCESS when they are being shut at .........
@dennissmith7214
3 жыл бұрын
Looks all similar just by different manufacturers?! 🤔
@nuruddin1991
3 жыл бұрын
Same goes to tank right
@Z_THORITY
3 жыл бұрын
Nah bro Every detail thing on Anti aircraft is usefull
@extijarm
2 жыл бұрын
1. 286 TUNGUSKA 2. PANTSIR-S1 3. LOARA
@bahjo7279
4 жыл бұрын
Oh mannnn....this is human invented things simply to split another person into pieces.....
@_Alo_
4 жыл бұрын
Or save themselves from being split into pieces
@Homoprimatesapiens
4 жыл бұрын
Pantsir S1 by far superior. Also transportable by Cargo or Freight A.C.
@somebody5368
3 жыл бұрын
Panzer*
@Bakiniyorum
3 жыл бұрын
What are their effective bullet range?
@Kalashnikov413
3 жыл бұрын
Around 800-1500m
@jantschierschky3461
3 жыл бұрын
@@Kalashnikov413 actually up to 3000m for the 35mm about 2000m for 25mm
@bimotrailer9131
4 жыл бұрын
I hope my country can to buy TUNGUSKA. 💪🏽🇮🇩
@saborise7485
4 жыл бұрын
Boy, screw every single vehicle on this list except the tunguska Warthunder players know why
@jacobkingsford5209
4 жыл бұрын
Of you play warthunder then you will know that the GAZ-AAA (4M) is obviously the best
@henkknol505
3 жыл бұрын
how nice , BUT on the 2:22 is NOT the Gepard but that was a PRTL ... just saying ;-)
@Bearbear711
3 жыл бұрын
Imagine these firing at soldiers
@trololoev
3 жыл бұрын
Tunguska and Pantsir didn't have 4 guns, they have 2*2-barrel gun.
@geoben1810
4 жыл бұрын
I'd be curious to see how a couple of A-10's would do against those.
@thesim3164
4 жыл бұрын
Bad
@themax9913
4 жыл бұрын
The Sim actually the A-10 and the Su-25 were made to survive to 30mm auto-canons mounted on the Shilka and similar system which is why the tunguska was made with a gun - missile tandem system. Basically, what the guns cant do , the missile will do which is why of all those systems, only a few *Missile / Canons tandem systems* like Pantsyr S1, 2K22, Flakpanzer Gepard A2, Type 95 (PGZ-95) or Type 09 (PGZ-5) as well as *higher calibers SPAAG* such as 2S38 (57mm), LVKV (40mm) or B1 Draco (76mm) might stand a chance (that is we dont take EW, ECM / SEAD / terrain or Surprise Factor into account).
@thesim3164
4 жыл бұрын
@@themax9913 A10 was shoot down by serbian army with praga gun
@themax9913
4 жыл бұрын
The Sim they were damaged, not shot down, that thing can take a hell of a lot of punishment and stay alive. Few were lost however, to manpads and heavy SAM.
@thesim3164
4 жыл бұрын
@@themax9913 shoot down actually
@changyan5741
4 жыл бұрын
These systems are as good as they are portrait. If you ask current defence expert then its South korean Biho that has dual radar. Even if its radar is counter measured, it has CCTV camera that can track the target and fire. Its is one of the youngest system among all shown here.
@maxspirin3945
3 жыл бұрын
It's "Toon-ghooz-kah" (the name of a river in Siberia, as well as Shilka)
@Mr_Jake_Smith
3 жыл бұрын
And while we're at it Ghe-parrrrd x'D
@scp_tankkill
3 жыл бұрын
Hey the m163 USA 20mm gun m61 Vulcar 2,100 rounds
@curiouscaesar6813
4 жыл бұрын
World's best - Cousin Tommy with a Lee enfield .303 standing on a willys jeep
@alecblunden8615
3 жыл бұрын
Closely followed by a Bren fired from the shoulder.
@davidsyth5330
2 жыл бұрын
What about the U.S.?
@chuckpeasley212
3 ай бұрын
Look up "M247 Sergeant York". It had twin 40mm Bofors guns.
@hasanfoyejul5500
3 жыл бұрын
ধন্যবাদ... thanks
@mahamajones2994
3 жыл бұрын
57mm that's something else!
@mortenlund1418
3 жыл бұрын
Would like to hear some more pro's and con's to a 57mm anti air gun. Rate of fire must be pretty low.
@burkanov
3 жыл бұрын
@@mortenlund1418 It's a concept and technology demonstrator. Army doesn't have them. But idea is pretty good, as its shells are not only more lethal, but have a much bigger range. Its main targets must be modern drones with flight attitude up to 7km. All other guns won't work there. But as said it's only a concept
@imrekalman9044
3 жыл бұрын
@@mortenlund1418 150-180 rpm. Maximum range is some 8 km. Good against drones, helicopters, CAS. Cons is that against a fast and agile target the rate of fire is really low. And AFAIK only a few entered service with the Russian PVO. It's just a BMP-3 with an old S-60 gun and some sensors after all (I'm oversimplifying).
@RAJEEVBHATNAGAR8480
3 жыл бұрын
Do India have one of these ???
@theroyalaustralian
4 жыл бұрын
The Type 87 can fire the exact same rounds as I described with the Flakpanzer 1 Gepard.
@franktank4360
4 жыл бұрын
Of course both Germany and Japan share weapons...
@jimahbarrow1229
4 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 ggeke oom
@borisgostovic666
3 жыл бұрын
Ich of this machines are deadly for aircrafts 5ft gen.. if they fly under the 3km. Maybe they cud escape from milsile,but from twin cannon ... i not sure...
@Ajay-fl7bl
4 жыл бұрын
Oerlikon everywhere
@ChiefCabioch
3 жыл бұрын
These look like the older ZSU guns on newer tracks
@Tigerssnakes
4 жыл бұрын
Awesome weapons
@firesturmgaming
4 жыл бұрын
Some of these AAs are in War Thunder and are super OP. Like the Tungska. Its pronounced "Grr-pad" not "Jepard". Also where's the OTOMATIC.
@Johnk98
4 жыл бұрын
otomagic you mean
@jessegm1
4 жыл бұрын
Otomatic is hot trash compared to how it preforms in warthunder
@jacobkingsford5209
4 жыл бұрын
It is pronounced tun goose Ka
@tomatensaft3491
4 жыл бұрын
Ah yes my new grr pad
@imrekalman9044
4 жыл бұрын
OTOMATIC never entered service. Only in WT.
@douglasbedell1917
3 жыл бұрын
Seems to me these things exhaust all their ammo in about 1 minute I'm sure to reload them is not easy. Not to mention the supply chain it would take to keep one firing for any length of time let alone three or four of them. I'm the battlefield in the heat of action I do not see how it would be possible
@ambassadorofreee3859
3 жыл бұрын
Short controlled bursts plus the fact that flying things need to get rather close to these things form them to be effective with their guns. Which probably the main one reason why most of them carry missiles aswell. Also if you just pulled a magdump with these they will shoot all their ammo well under one minute :'D What comes to reloading these I'm pretty sure that they have a way to reload these vehicles in reasonable amount of time.
@Mohammad_Qunbos
3 жыл бұрын
I wanted to see the Gatling that was in the thumbnail. Also, you forgot Kurkut that does't looks different and more modern unlike those similar systems.
@ChaosUnleashed897
3 жыл бұрын
Check out Matsimus' channel, he has a video about the rotary cannon.
@joseortega5407
3 жыл бұрын
You mean the Vulcan! M163A1 self propelled American antiaircraft gun. It is impressive and very noisy too!
@imrekalman9044
3 жыл бұрын
@@joseortega5407 And was withdrawn from US service in '94.
@earleburtonjr9292
3 жыл бұрын
Burnt gun powder, smells like, victory.
@destroyer7249
3 жыл бұрын
War thunder fans sure do love the gepard
@tahahormozan
3 жыл бұрын
If there was M1AGDS it would be in top of the list
@ernielara1553
2 жыл бұрын
Ukrainian forces could use one of these!
@jukkaraninen1494
Жыл бұрын
earlikon is is best!!
@dilflanders
4 жыл бұрын
It seems oerlikon has a corner on the market
@CS-zn6pp
4 жыл бұрын
They are all basically the same turret with the locally produced radar and chassis. The Gepard is based on a leopard chassis and the polish one on a t-72 chassis.
@dilflanders
4 жыл бұрын
@@CS-zn6pp ahhhhhh that makes a lot of sense. Why change something thats already one of the best from the sounds of it
@محمدالسعدني-ظ2م
4 жыл бұрын
@@dilflanders صديقي انا فقط اتساءال في اى بلد هاذه الاسلحه
@jasonk.beihneipha6483
4 жыл бұрын
Sidam looks like saddam project
@cwf_media9200
2 жыл бұрын
Why do you don't mention the Otomatic
@CaptainCheeriso
3 жыл бұрын
I love the jepard
@jantschierschky3461
3 жыл бұрын
Gepard
@malkuwon8691
4 жыл бұрын
Best system is Pansir-S2 M system.
@yelbegentuna6269
4 жыл бұрын
However, it could not see the Turkish war drones in syria and was destroyed
@Tankliker
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, definitely. I mean it is unproven the best...
@loliciousfakurama2524
4 жыл бұрын
@@yelbegentuna6269 ** and Libya
@ivanlagrossemoule
3 жыл бұрын
"the best is the one with the really poor combat record"
@benedictuspramudanajesudas7867
3 жыл бұрын
The best is that soviet truck boi with maxim
@royalteluis623
4 жыл бұрын
It’s pronounced Gep-ard
@thomasbessis2809
3 жыл бұрын
The "djeperd"... Yep sounds about right
@anakin5136
3 жыл бұрын
Muito legal seu video, parabéns!
@adnaanadaani2042
3 жыл бұрын
hi dear give me your whatsapp number
@wazh999
4 жыл бұрын
0:38 these tanks has minecraft’s camo
@goblincleaver_mshm.9751
4 жыл бұрын
We call it digital camo
@wazh999
4 жыл бұрын
Victor Medina 🤨
@wazh999
4 жыл бұрын
Victor Medina stupid 9yo kid that just play fortnite 😟
Пікірлер: 649