Please tell me Neville got a chocolate frog card too.
@orfeas248
7 жыл бұрын
Christine S it would make sense if most of the characters in the books got a chocolate card. especially those in the order of the phoenix and those who fought in the battle of hogwarts
@estherlauterbach2189
7 жыл бұрын
people gush over Harmony and Draymione, but I love good ol' Neville and Luna
@camdenjohnson3295
7 жыл бұрын
Sir Wildrunner are you saying Neville married Luna
@christinew1644
7 жыл бұрын
No he didn't. That was just the MOVIES. Their relationship is NOT in the books. He married Hannah Abbott and Luna married Rolf Scamander.
@estherlauterbach2189
7 жыл бұрын
well then I ship em. like Harmony or Draymione. Nevuna ftw!
@ziyad1809
7 жыл бұрын
Ron often "swears" in the books. I recall many times when he said something like "what in the name of merlin's saggy left-" and was cut off by someone.
@EricTheKei
7 жыл бұрын
That may have been what Rowling meant -- he gets cut off just before getting to the "important" part of the swear.
@gabriellaodwyerpapp7216
7 жыл бұрын
"What in Marlins most saggy Y-fronts" is my favorite
@liminal.lizzie
7 жыл бұрын
"Bloody hell"
@phs125
7 жыл бұрын
Hermione said Merlin's pants once. It was considered a big deal by Ron.
@tanishjacob-rego4513
7 жыл бұрын
He usually says effing( f- ing,)
@tomdunne255
7 жыл бұрын
Does the fact that Hermione went back to Hogwarts mean that she was in the same year as Ginny?
@TemariNaraannaschatz
7 жыл бұрын
Yes, they finished school together =)
@TemariNaraannaschatz
7 жыл бұрын
Ginny is one year unter Hermione. BUT Hermione did not attend her seventh year at Hogwarts, while Ginny did attend her sixth year at Hogwarts. So AFTER the war was over they both went to their shared seventh year at Hogwarts. Together.
@rubystorey2035
7 жыл бұрын
Tom Dunne Hermione, Ron and harry quit hog warts before their last year so that they could look for horcruxes then hermione went back to do her finals.
@kratausahma1222
7 жыл бұрын
I've always imagined that those kids who studied in Hogwarts during the events of Deathly Hallows would go that through that grade again, because when Snape was the Headmaster, things were quite a lot different in Hogwarts. They weren't exactly teaching all those things they should've and some parts of magic they weren't supposed to teach the students according to the normal rules. So, according to that logic, Ginny would still be in her sixth grade (although in seventh year), when Hermione was on her seventh grade (and also on her seventh year, because she left the school after sixth grade/year and came back only after the events of DH). Of course, I have no fact-based knowledge of this, so don't take it too seriously. It's just what I figured that happened. (and sorry if this text has some errors, english is not my first language).
@TemariNaraannaschatz
7 жыл бұрын
Actually most of the stuff they taught was the same. I mean Herbiology doesn't change when Death Eaters take over the school, neither do Charms or Astrology and so on. The only thing that they probably did not get taught properly was DaDa, because there was no DaDa. And they were at war, so they probably knew what they would have learned already. And considering that Hermione, Ron and Harrys other DaDa teachers included a guy with Voldemort on his head, a guy who could only cast one spell really good and Umbrige, I think learning Dark Arts, instead of Defence against the Dark Arts is not that much of a difference. At least they learned something.
@mubashrafalik7037
7 жыл бұрын
I think it was more Dumbledore could SENSE his presence through the spell, but couldn't actually SEE him, because as we all know, this Cloak was the real deal.
@heartachelsea8141
7 жыл бұрын
L
@padfoot9344
7 жыл бұрын
Mubashra Falik I agree because it says in the seventh book that no spell can reveal the person that has the invisibility cloak on.
@jesussaves6629
7 жыл бұрын
I agree. Before I thought about it, I was kind of confused when I read that, thinking that I must've misread something in the books...
@brandongehringer5213
7 жыл бұрын
or the fact that dumbledore had the elder wand might have been the reason he could see him through the cloak.
@hollieprice4477
7 жыл бұрын
yh but how could the brother escape death if he could be seen by a simple spell
@timrob12
7 жыл бұрын
6:34 - Loved the mention in Cursed Child that Dudley had brought Harry's baby blanket back to him after Petunia passed away.
@JaneDoe-wd7mp
7 жыл бұрын
Yes, Tom, because only humans die.
@excalibur2772
7 жыл бұрын
Jane Doe I believe some beings in their universe don't die (like the phoenix)
@emc246
7 жыл бұрын
Eliman8 III It dies eventually. It just lives very long.
@excalibur2772
7 жыл бұрын
EM11212 can dementors die? I thought phoenixes live indefinitely until they are killed or commit suicide.
@emc246
7 жыл бұрын
Eliman8 III I think Dementors live forever. In mythology, Phoenixes can live thousands of years but will eventually die.
@JaneDoe-wd7mp
7 жыл бұрын
My point, guys, was that other creatures die, too. Not that no creatures live forever (: do you think Hermione is older than everyone after using the time tuner?
@DBLCreations
7 жыл бұрын
I prefer the #1 version of Voldie's body, so that everyone saw he was that. Now he was just disappearing in ashes :/ Really nice video!
@condorboss3339
7 жыл бұрын
In the "19 Years Later" scene, I was hoping Dudley would show up on platform 9&3/4 with a young witch or wizard in tow.
@AmiWhiteWolf
7 жыл бұрын
So, Hermoine graduated with Ginny and Luna?
@JuanNunez-dt1fn
7 жыл бұрын
AmiWhiteWolf After the war, Hermione returns to Hogwarts to complete her year.
@JasonErdmann
7 жыл бұрын
AmiWhiteWolf or she just sat the exams and was done with it... but knowing her she'd want to go through the motions.
@Joeru510
7 жыл бұрын
Yeah she graduated with them since she didn't attend her 7th year and went after the war which was Ginny and Luna's 7th year and her basically finally finishing
@Zazzysylvester
7 жыл бұрын
Wouldnt Luna need to retake her sixts year
@kookiemsp3366
6 жыл бұрын
Zazzysylvester no.
@GaymerL
7 жыл бұрын
I think it would of been really cool if they made one of dudley's kids a witch or wizard
@camdenjohnson3295
7 жыл бұрын
Lewis Smith DUDLEY HAS KIDS???!!!
@MrRyanick67
7 жыл бұрын
Actually, J.K. Rowling had intended to make Dudley's child a wizard and that in the epilogue of Harry Potter, Harry and Dudley would meet at the Platform 9 3/4 to see their children off to Hogwarts. But then J.K. Rowling changed her mind and stated that "no magic gene will ever get past down to the Dursley due to Harry's uncle intense hatred towards magic".
@jojo_is_a_go5893
7 жыл бұрын
Faiz Amin knowing that, any magical kids they had would've made another obscurial.
@Mukation
7 жыл бұрын
Technically Vernons hatred comes from what he has heard from his wife Petunia. Everything Vernon and Dudley knew about magic came from her. She was initially envious of her sisters magic and that envy evolved into hatred. She took in Harry because she knew that her sisters magic protected Harry (and them as well) as long as he stayed with someone related to him on his mothers side. Even if she hated and mistreated him, she still "cared" enough to not let him be murdered :P
@nathaliem3322
7 жыл бұрын
No, it's definitely Vernon's innate hatred and genetic normalcy that killed any chances of Dudley's kids being magical. Vernon hated magic before he even knew there was magic; it's what drew Petunia to Vernon. Petunia sensed he had an affinity for the ordinary and hated everything that wasn't, so it was only to be expected for him to hate magic. Check out Vernon & Petunia Dursley on Pottemore. You've kind of said it yourself, Petunia's hatred of magic was sourced in envy, and I don't think that's enough to kill the gene. If she had married someone who wasn't "the worst sort of muggle imaginable," Dudley could definitely have had some magical offspring. But then the Dursley's wouldn't have been the Dursley's and Harry wouldn't have gone through all that character building (cough cough, abuse, cough)!
@rubeushagrid8966
7 жыл бұрын
ron swore A LOT in the books too, it just said ron swore not the actual word, and in the books it said that snape's portrait didn't appear
@MC-gj8fg
7 жыл бұрын
You wouldn't think that a reveal spell simple enough to be used by a student would be powerful enough to overcome an enchantment as great as a deathly hallow.
@ShirinRose
7 жыл бұрын
Also, the spell was being performed by another of the hallows, the elder wand...
@BestBrightside
7 жыл бұрын
thanks, wouldn't have thought of that.. also explains why snape never (succesfully?) used the spell when he heard Harry while partolling the halls :D
@CanMadran
7 жыл бұрын
But that doesn't explain why the death itself cannot find the wearer. Are you suggesting that the death cannot cast magic?
@Outland9000
7 жыл бұрын
Its a little hazy when it comes to the cloak... Is it one of the deathly hallows or 'just' another, yet rare invisibility cloak?
@mayam9575
7 жыл бұрын
can madran I think that's a myth like the story of the three brothers and the river
@hannahsmart4494
7 жыл бұрын
She could have made up wizarding swear words for Ron to use, I mean why would muggle swear words be used by wizards if they mostly grow up detached from the muggle world?
@lucianwaltz5952
7 жыл бұрын
Considering the Weasleys are quite fond of muggles, Ron may have learnt some.
@hannahsmart4494
7 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but that doesn't mean they only know muggle swear words. They're very fond of muggles, but they're not always very good at figuring out muggle objects or habits or things like that
@lucianwaltz5952
7 жыл бұрын
It's a possibility? The wizarding language isn't any different from the muggle world too. Or maybe JKR haven't thought much about that. Or she wasn't allowed to do that either.
@hannahsmart4494
7 жыл бұрын
Lucian Waltz True, that is a fair point
@ierrose49
7 жыл бұрын
I believe "Merlin's beard" is one
@Connor_Tyler
7 жыл бұрын
Number 10 bugs me, like, a lot. If the Tale of the Three Brothers was real, and there's some decent evidence it was since the Stone works, then how does a simple spell see through a cloak powerful enough to hide its wearer from Death itself? And doesn't Moody's eye see through it a couple times too?
@mattattack_1231
7 жыл бұрын
That's EXACTLY what I thought!!!!
@Emsev100
7 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure about Moody, BUT I guess the spell Dumbledore used might have worked because he had the elder wand. :)
@TheAmazingGamerTeamZ
7 жыл бұрын
It's because it was from the elder wand, they are both from the deathly hallows so it makes sense and it is the strongest wand in the world
@DragonLandlord
7 жыл бұрын
how about all the times Snape almost caught them in the halls with nothing more than his senses?
@Emsev100
7 жыл бұрын
DragonLandlord That's how humans work actually... for some reason (not all of us) but many humans can actually sense things we can't see... It´s kind of a survival defense. We feel like there is something that is not right or out of the ordinary, but we can't put a finger on what. I guess that is why Snape almost caught them from time to time. He is good at sensing things... Plus humans are not entirely quiet. Footsteps, breathing... and so on... The cloak makes you invisible not muted. (do you say muted in this sentence? Not born a english-speaker so I'm not sure!). (^_^)
@21chemicalatthedisco93
7 жыл бұрын
1. I guess that's why in the Lego HP games, Voldemort's boggart is Harry. 2. Makes sense... 3. Poor Dumbledore!!! 4. I always thought that the two wouldn't. 5. Literally best fact of all time. 6. Snape. Can seem to be bad, but has a slight breakthrough at death. 7. Wasn't tks mentioned in the movie? I feel like it was, but probably not. I still feel like Neville is the real chosen one but Voldemort chose Harry himself. ;-; 8. One of my favorite facts. 9. It's shown in the Cursed Child though... which is technically a HP book. 10. Dang. Dumbledore the smart
@ornitharts
7 жыл бұрын
Arianna Dovahkiin Neville is the real chosen one! Everybody who says otherwise is wrong. Also Neville is BAE.
@tessbellman5229
7 жыл бұрын
Arianna Dovahkiin No, Cursed Child is not 'technically' a Harry Potter book. It is not. Sure, it is a bound book with pages but it is just the bound version of the script of a PLAY. Play scripts are not books, nor are the plays themselves. You cannot righteously criticize this fact with the backup that it was revealed in Cursed Child!!! I am tired of people saying that there are now eight books, because there is NOT! There is seven books, one play, and one bound and published play script!!! Thank you for listening to my concerns.
@suami4596
7 жыл бұрын
Tess Bellman thank goodness
@emc246
7 жыл бұрын
Tess Bellman Cursed child is canon, so I count it as part of the series. You don't have to agree with me, but I know that many people do.
@21chemicalatthedisco93
7 жыл бұрын
Okay. Me calling it was a book is a little out of line. But with me, I count it as a half book- same with Shakespeare. It is written as a play, but being brought onto paper, in a book manuscript, I count it as a book... Like a dictionary is just a list of word meanings, but it counts as a book. :P But that's just my view on the matter
@carsenh7968
7 жыл бұрын
Any other Potterheads already know all these? NOT hating or anything on the video, I love it, but . . . yeah.
@liara3248
7 жыл бұрын
Regan Hoffman yep exactly what I was thinking It's a good video but
@Parklout
7 жыл бұрын
Not read The Cursed Child (don't know if I will either) but all before the end of the books I knew and speculated some of the others. I knew Harry would be on chocolate-frog cards but all three of them made me really happy. The fate of Neville's parents seemed set in stone after being described in the 5th book and Dudley obviously appreciated Harry somewhat in the end so...
@epice1235
7 жыл бұрын
Regan Hoffman pretty much know em' all
@Minarzipan
7 жыл бұрын
Not everyone is a Potterhead ;)
@lizapiashko9105
7 жыл бұрын
Mina yeah
@solarsonic7178
7 жыл бұрын
Didn't Dudley set their childhood feud aside completely after Harry saved him from the dementor in OotP while Harry forgave him but had a hard time being around him? It's pretty evident in the DH goodbye scene that Dudley likes Harry and regrets his actions.
@Joeru510
7 жыл бұрын
Jk Rowling said that after the attack, Dudley now saw what was wrong with him and what he had been doing wrong all his life, therefore he started to change his attitude and personality since the dementors went after him because all he had were a lot of bad mean memories
@PhilBagels
7 жыл бұрын
Also, as we all know, horcruxes cause anger and hate and fear to all in their immediate vicinity. And Harry was a horcrux! Once the fragment of Voldy's soul was no longer in Harry, the psychological side effect of those nearby hating him was able to wear off.
@mossy1379
7 жыл бұрын
*Cries a little over Neville*
@postmasterpez
7 жыл бұрын
I always thougt that it was due to Dubbeldores great intuion that gave him the power to se when Harry is inviseble.
@masterames5606
7 жыл бұрын
postmasterpez Harry takes the cloak off when he is there
@bone9jdjkaye
7 жыл бұрын
silent spell to know he was there.
@jenrrr
7 жыл бұрын
postmasterpez or he is actually Ron, who used a time Turner to go back and become dumbledore, meaning he knew harry had gone because harry told him afterwards
@bone9jdjkaye
7 жыл бұрын
that's a stupid theory full of flaws... such as the sister Ariana... etc. also that would mess up time so badly... hominem revelio is a silent spell which reveals nearby people to you...
@wethepeople5753
7 жыл бұрын
+CAT LOLS Make s NO sense. Why would Ron (as Dumbledore) bring the boy Riddle to Hogwarts knowing who he becomes? Surely he could've cast a memory charm to make him forget he had powers and then (being the great and powerful Dumbledore) remove his powers or restrict their use?
@butternutsquash1
7 жыл бұрын
That picture of Alice and Frank... and then there's just Mad-Eye in the background 😂😂
@angelojoshuaandeo9884
7 жыл бұрын
I almost cried about Neville's parents condition. The music makes me sentimental. The characters are like real persons who get hurt.
@mariedelaroche8278
7 жыл бұрын
In the first book, Dumbledore said that if he looked in the mirror he saw himself with a pair of socks
@mariabernatova25
7 жыл бұрын
Marie Delaroche Would you say to an 11 year old boy u just met that ur deepest wish is to see the family u once killed and ruined reunited?
@LePvpLer
7 жыл бұрын
Obviously he lied to Harry... He couldn't say what happened to an 11 years old
@TheSaneHatter
7 жыл бұрын
" . . . But then, harry realized, it had been an extremely personal question."
@mariabernatova25
7 жыл бұрын
exactly
@viccolasvic9461
7 жыл бұрын
Marie Delaroche when I saw the movie (haven't gotten around to the book series) I honestly thought when he was talking about socks that he was a simple happy man with no regrets or needs.
@rastiga9196
7 жыл бұрын
Wow. I kinda guessed some of this but her work is more beautiful now. I even learned a new word "ignominious". Good job researching!
@emmacrooke807
7 жыл бұрын
I always just figured that since soo many people say that Harry takes after James, Dumbledore always knew that Harry would be hiding there. I never thought he used a spell.
@TheRealTricky
7 жыл бұрын
Except for the chocolate frog cards I already knew them all, but I must say that Harry, Ron and Hermione making it onto those cards only made sense after what they had done. Harry might have been the chosen one to destroy Voldemort, but without Ron and Hermione he would definitely have failed. Basically the same for Frodo (Lord of the Rings) who had to destroy the one ring, but who would definitely have failed without Sam. Maybe a clear message about how you cannot obtain true success all by yourself but how you do need the support of others. Oh, I'm getting too philosophical here. I can also add that Flitwick is part goblin, and that is the reason he is so small. I believe Rowling did plan to mention that in the books, but never found the right place to do that.
@chaplainrose38
7 жыл бұрын
TheRealTricky o.o
@jonathanheygt4326
7 жыл бұрын
The guy who voiced the audio books couldn't pronounce "harry pocketed it" he kept reading "harry pocketeded it" he call jk Rowling and asked if he could say harry put it in his pocket, she said no. The phrase "harry pocketed it" appeared in the remaining books
@samwendt4559
7 жыл бұрын
FANTASTIC BEAST SPOILER On the Grindelwald/Dumbledore thing: I think when Graves (Grindelwald) asks Newt why Dumbledore liked him so much, he's a little jealous. Thoughts?
@Joeru510
7 жыл бұрын
Explain more, jealous of newt being liked by Dumbledore? Or what? Please explain im interested lol
@AgentOrange859
7 жыл бұрын
Lol true.
@moonwalker8365
7 жыл бұрын
Sam Wendt I'm convinced that one of the next movies will be about their romance and about his sister Ariane who could be an Obscurus (really, read the 7th Book again, there are a lot of hints!)
@insertsomewittynamehere8507
7 жыл бұрын
This made me nostalgic for some reason.
@uiuxshoaib
7 жыл бұрын
Man this feels so real, wish we really had a magical world too.
@jimslancio
7 жыл бұрын
In Deathly Hallows, Percy Weasley abruptly decides to reconcile himself with his father and family. That happens to be about the same time that Peter "Wormtail" Pettigrew dies. Pettigrew, as Scabbers the rat, had been Percy's pet before he was Ron's. The books didn't way anything about any spells Pettigrew might've cast on Percy, but Pettigrew had plenty of opportunity to do so, and it might've worn off just as he died.
@technicaldifficulties3289
7 жыл бұрын
At least they all were reunited after death
@joonsjorts7832
7 жыл бұрын
Oml, on Ron's the second one, it looked like the intro to his intervention😂😂 "Ron. Sit down we need to talk about you cursing problem" "sit down, it's safe here"
@alikat1739
7 жыл бұрын
What's wrong with Dumbledore at 4:41.....
@itsMiatch
7 жыл бұрын
Slender Dumbledore, the new antagonist of the next book in the series.
@jojo_is_a_go5893
7 жыл бұрын
Alikat 27 it's a mannequin of the full Dumblebore costume. Beard and all.
@nataliaduran7515
7 жыл бұрын
I think it's from the line of the Harry Potter ride in the wizarding world of Harry Potter in universal Florida
@winterseyes
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this beautiful video I really enjoyed the music and learning some things about the Harry Potter Universe I didn't know.
@mtma1996
7 жыл бұрын
It is stated in the books that Nevilles parents would stay at St. Mungos.
@janNowa
7 жыл бұрын
mtma1996 Yes, but I think the video means that even after the series ends they don't get better.
@larrybobinski7156
7 жыл бұрын
To fact #5: Dubledoor is Gay First, my argument is completely from a literary point of view. When you do a character analysis you can only go with what is actually in the written source material. You SHOW the reader who the character is, you don't TELL them who the character is. There is little if any evidence in the first seven books that establish any sexual orientation for the character. The author had plenty of time in her world building to include some artifacts that could suggest what she wants to be true. But she failed to do so. The intent of the author and the vision they have of the character is helpful to them to determine how they would act in a given situation, but if it doesn't get in the book that is where it ends. She could have a photo album of his Hogwarts days sitting next to a boy on a bench holding hands, in a pensive memory he could have mused on the attractiveness of a man he met at the ministry. Small things like that would not have detracted from the plot any more than the dozen obligatory pages about a quiddich match. But she chose not to. Dumbledore from the evidence in the book IS NOT GAY and he isn't straight either. He has no sexual orientation. Because for whatever reason it wasn't important to his character. It doesn't matter if the Author herself thinks it's true, or wishes she had done more to establish it in the books. So until she gets around to publishing Harry Potter: The After Years, and has a scene where Harry's Hogwarts reunion comes and sorts through a trunk of Dumbledore's things and find some evidence. Or she writes a prequel and includes substance to the fact, it will remain as it is now. The characters are only what is printed.
@SoupsSB
7 жыл бұрын
If the CREATOR of Dumbledore says he's gay then he is gay .-.
@larrybobinski7156
7 жыл бұрын
Yeah no, that isn't how it works among literary scholars. The creator can say something, and the fan base can accept it, but that doesn't make it true from a scholarly point of view. And that is the point I was arguing from. I said as much in the very first sentence of my argument. Personally I HOPE she writes more novels that exlore the the characters more deeply in a less "the world is ending" setting. I know "the world is on fire and we have to save it" is exciting and sells books, but could you imagine a fantasy romantic comedy involving a dumbledore love triangle. It would be wonderful.
@larrybobinski7156
7 жыл бұрын
Maybe in magical Christmas land, but not in the world of literature and scholarship.
@wd2642
7 жыл бұрын
I guess Grindelwald never existed, then, did he? She hinted at the fact that Dumbledore was completely devoted to him.
@larrybobinski7156
7 жыл бұрын
You can be completely devoted to someone or something without having a sexual attraction. You wouldn't say Mother Teresa wasn't completely devoted to the cause of serving the poor if she didn't think about how sexually attracted she was to them. No, that isn't good enough. I gave examples of what would constitute in text evidence. A vague slip of the tongue isn't substantial. She didn't say, "I was completely devoted to Grendlewald, and I realized that the moment we looked each other in the eye after a tender embrace." ... No, there was nothing of the sort ANYWHERE in the novels. Now granted that is pretty extreme and wouldn't be appropriate to the setting in a book aimed at children, but you hopefully get the point.
@kaylenpotter6147
7 жыл бұрын
Whose watching in 2017❤️💗😱
@rubenlay610
7 жыл бұрын
Berrywishes me good sir!
@lizapiashko9105
7 жыл бұрын
Berrywishes me its january 3rd
@davidmartinez5481
7 жыл бұрын
Berrywishes I saw this got really confused for a second and though... "what the hell we aren't in 2017?"
@selenewolf7818
7 жыл бұрын
Berrywishes me
@kaylenpotter6147
7 жыл бұрын
I literally can't believe it's 2017 it went by so fast😔❤️💩
@norahgilbert1679
7 жыл бұрын
I really like how you added evidence to all of your points.
@Tracktark
7 жыл бұрын
Well, If he didn't no one would believe him.
@seraphiccandy21
7 жыл бұрын
@ Riki, thats not how the internet works. Most people will believe everything they read. Thats why snopes exists
@mszame
7 жыл бұрын
other than those facts, i just want to say that the pictures and music were perfect for this video! they really created the kind of tone you'd want. the music wasn't loud not too soft to make you want to go to sleep. it was just right. well done☺
@jesussaves6629
7 жыл бұрын
MS Zame I almost fell asleep, but it was beautiful and it was perfect for the video.
@mszame
7 жыл бұрын
Arwen Undomiel ikr, it was just so relaxing☺😊
@nicomcgill4619
7 жыл бұрын
Great vid! I love that you based it off the books, and not the movies!
@floren01_
7 жыл бұрын
Once Remus died and all the Marauders were gone, the Marauders Map cleared itself from all its contents, instead choosing to forever display the words, _Mischief Managed_
@rockpooladmirer
7 жыл бұрын
Florencia Montiel Rios :(((((((
@ramsbottom4745
7 жыл бұрын
This comment was honestly more real than the video and hit me right in the heart
@adrianasevilla8984
5 жыл бұрын
w h y 😭😭
@setantaballesty8240
7 жыл бұрын
#7 "they suffered a fate worse than death"- Sirius Black- order of the phionex (movie)
@goof-ek4df
7 жыл бұрын
feels like a cheap excuse on the invisibility cloak. a Cloak that " hides you from death" has such a weak flaw?
@ellastamsnijder1364
7 жыл бұрын
Dumbledores family made me tear up a little
@latrolettteeeeeee
7 жыл бұрын
What's with the depressing music ? --'
@ThePepsiMinimum
7 жыл бұрын
Animationexclusive i found the music really relaxing and not depressing at all... slightly studio ghibli but less magical i think
@latrolettteeeeeee
7 жыл бұрын
I think it's beautiful.. but depressing. You'd think no one survived.
@Daanblanssie
7 жыл бұрын
The music was amazing! It made all the facts emotional somehow
@chrisrudolf9839
7 жыл бұрын
Sadly, while the books were very entertaining, J.K. Rowling was not very good at building a consistent fantasy world and frequently contradicts herself in her statements and in the books. I call bullshit on the fact that Snape's portrait didn't appear because he "abandoned" his post as headmaster before his death. Fleeing from a duell in which his second in command tries to capture or kill him hardly qualifies as resigning and Minister Pius Thickness certainly did not sack him. Rowling just made that up when fans pestered her why there was no portrait of Snape mentioned in Harry's final conversation with Dumbledores portrait, she had probably just forgotten that it should be there when she wrote the scene.I also call bullshit on the statement that Dumbledore could sense Harry under the invisibility cloak using a silent "hominum revelio". In book 7, Rowling had revealed that the cloak was actually the third deathly hallow, it's protection not penetrable by any magic. If it was that easy, the cloak would hardly have been such a unique artefact. It also would have been incredibly unlikely that no one else ever tried that (Like e.g. the deatheater who tried "accio invisibility cloak" when Harry and his friends arrived in Hogsmeade in the 7th book and set off the caterwauling charm.A third statement I find rather unlikely is that Harry never graduated from Hogwarts, since we learn in book 6 that you definitely need NEWTS in several subjects (too lazy to look up the specific ones right now) to become an auror and we learn in book 7 that Harry did beome an auror, though I concede that they may have just made an exception for him based on the fact that he brought down the most dangerous dark wizard of all time.
@loic64
7 жыл бұрын
Chris Rudolf srry i don't think anyone is going to read that. It's just too long
@matheikazsofia7727
7 жыл бұрын
Actually I think that one of the main reasons Harry Potter is as succesful as it is now is that J. K. Rowling DID create a whole world with full of details and explanations. Of course we can find little mistakes in anything - no, I wouldn't say mistaxes but little unexplained or overexplained situations - but in the whole this is the ONLY series where the writer stays involved in all the movies, even in the Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them series and has a word and opinion that counts; like when she said that Dumbledore was gay although it had not been written in any of the books. And the way the story opens and turns out is crazy - when you read the books again you can really see why things happen as they happen and I can always found new details every time I read them.
@nabin6976
7 жыл бұрын
Chris Rudolf Elder wand ? Although I must admit I don't think Rowling actually thought of it...but it makes perfect sense that elder wand can see through invisibility cloak!
@chrisrudolf9839
7 жыл бұрын
Nabin Great Well, on the one hand you do have a point, if there was one item that could penetrate through the defense of the cloak, then it might probably be another deathly hallow. But on the other hand, according to the tale of the three brothers, Ignotus Peverell used the cloak succesfully to hide from death himself, thereby escaping death's revenge. That is IMHO a strong point against the theory that other artefacts created by death could beat it. But maybe I'm overthinking it now, there were hints in the book that the tale of the three brothers was probably just a legend with a true core, not literally true.
@ilsekleinvelderman26
7 жыл бұрын
when Kingsley became minister of magic, he allowed anyone who fought in the battle of hogwarts to work for the ministry regardless of papers.
@ThatSoddingGamer
7 жыл бұрын
Didn't a death eater use Hominum Revelio, and it failed to detect Harry and co. when they were under the invisibility cloak in Hogsmeade? Granted, maybe it's just that his wand and skill are such that he can simply cast a more powerful version of the spell which could break past the defenses of the cloak. However, I think it would make more sense that Dumbledore developed his own method of detecting the cloak, considering he had it in his possession for about 10 years. He would have had ample time to study it and develop his own charm to detect or see through it.
@xJonnaax
7 жыл бұрын
the frog cards were the best bit XD
@jannasiertsema5398
7 жыл бұрын
if yoy readed the books you knw neville's are in the hospital for the rest their life...
@feetbilo8169
7 жыл бұрын
Spoiler alert
@jannasiertsema5398
7 жыл бұрын
tommy ie emm this si not spoilering bc the book are so Long out everybody readed it
@arizellelezira7962
7 жыл бұрын
If you read the books, then you would know simple english 🙄🙄
@jannasiertsema5398
7 жыл бұрын
Zebella Barmosa i readed it in dutch... duh
@MrMarvinacelukey
7 жыл бұрын
janna artist so you readeded it?
@harrystocker8222
7 жыл бұрын
Some I new, but some finally managed to teach me something new. But these facts with the music that was paying just made me sad thinking about it. It's a bit extreme, but Hermione, Ron and Harry would be seen like we see people like Anne Frank for example, people who lived in the darkest times of they're world and will be known about forever. J.K Rowling really did create something beautiful.
@souldeep91
7 жыл бұрын
this together with the music gave me huge goose bumps...
@michaellowe7622
7 жыл бұрын
Neville finished the job for his parents who couldn't do it themselves...😭😭😭
@TheSpacecraftX
7 жыл бұрын
Ron swears a lot in the book. It usually was written as "Ron swore loudly" or "effing".
@stevesangels2406
7 жыл бұрын
Imagine if Sirius' full name was Sirius lee black
@PhilBagels
7 жыл бұрын
How much more black could it be? The answer is none. None more black.
@marljusweety6606
7 жыл бұрын
I liked this video. I know alot of harry potter trivia, but still learned some new stuff. And its great having the quotes and background info. Well done.
@frazerfastin6854
7 жыл бұрын
It says Harry and friends so Neville probably also got a card
@jesussaves6629
7 жыл бұрын
Frazer Fastin He'd deserve it. ⚡
@alexman5347
7 жыл бұрын
fantastic video! those were actual valid points and I only knew half of them as opposed to all of them in most videos like this 👍🏼
@Miatpi
7 жыл бұрын
Still nothing of Nevilles Patronus...
@eeveeluvs6179
7 жыл бұрын
Miatpi Maybe he's not able to produce one? He probably doesn't have very many happy memories with all that's happened to him, much less a memory happy enough to produce a patronus
@Miatpi
7 жыл бұрын
He almost succeeded during their training in book 5
@eeveeluvs6179
7 жыл бұрын
Almost, but maybe that was just as far as he got?
@-xx12
7 жыл бұрын
I am on the verge of tears! The music and heart warming facts got to me. As long as the sad ones, like Neville's parents. AND DUDLEY AND HARRY! I COULDN'T HANDEL IT! IT WAS MY FAVORITE ONE! I CANT EXPRESE HOW MUCH I LOVE IT!
@christinehumphrey
7 жыл бұрын
In my opinion, anything that wasn't in the books isn't a thing. JK Rowling could have written it in instead of adding it sometime later to make society happy. Example: Dumbledore is gay. Absolutely nothing in the books suggested it, it was added later.
@avaborch-solem2300
7 жыл бұрын
Depends on how you look at it, I guess. In the last book when Dumbledore revealed his friendship and Grindelwald, I always thought he talked about the other boy in a rather romantic manner. Might've been because of the Norwegian translation though, as "inflamed", in most scenarios means "horny as fuck" here.
@larrybobinski7156
7 жыл бұрын
Correct, if it isn't in the book then it shouldn't be considered cannon. I'd argue that the movies could be considered cannon as well because there are some minor differences, but nothing major. As for the language of translation. I'd stick with the English translation for the simple reason it was originally written in English and later translated, and as the old saying goes things are often lost in translation.
@lestatmullins5455
7 жыл бұрын
it isn't flat out stated, but when looking through Skeeter's tell all book. they discuss the unusual relation ship between the boys, implying it strongly
@camdenjohnson3295
7 жыл бұрын
Larry Bobinski did you just say there are no major changes in the movie DUDE HARRY SNAPPED THE ELDER WAND IN 2 IN THE MOVIE WHILE IN THE BOOK HE PLACED IT BACK IN DUMBLEDORES THOMB.
@wafiya8079
7 жыл бұрын
she couldn't fit everything in d buks nw, cud she??
@vomitgulper
7 жыл бұрын
"My editor won't let my characters curse" Cough cough molly Weasley cough cough
@arniecalang4583
7 жыл бұрын
What even is ignominious?
@anna-xp6eh
7 жыл бұрын
humiliating, degrading
@arniecalang4583
7 жыл бұрын
anna thx
@QuantumTap
7 жыл бұрын
i remember when i was having a geek-out with a few friends, and we got to the potter-verse, and someone asked me how i had reacted, and i told them it really didnt matter, not because of equality though, but because Dumbledore doesnt have time for relationships. he could be sexually attracted to hammers and itd still be the same he is a busy guy
@Gurthgod
7 жыл бұрын
...I don't understand. Why are these facts, when the book is fictional, and is the only source for facts, really.
@Gurthgod
7 жыл бұрын
Just stop
@weberman173
7 жыл бұрын
these are "facts" because the writer of the Bock, j.k.Rowling had say that this are facts, and because its her "universe" she decides wat is true
@shinystoness
7 жыл бұрын
The music makes it sound like a funeral for J.K Rowling... Hehe I still love this video
@bone9jdjkaye
7 жыл бұрын
The facts not in the books are not facts.
@bone9jdjkaye
7 жыл бұрын
***** JK may have made them up on the spot.
@emc246
7 жыл бұрын
djkaye youtube What's your point? The entire first book was made up on the spot.
@bone9jdjkaye
7 жыл бұрын
EM11212 What so If JK Rowling said randomly in an interview that Hermione was cheating on ron for Neville longbottom it'd be a fact?
@anttibjorklund1869
7 жыл бұрын
Yes. As the author of the series, J.K. has a say in what is canon.
@chrisrudolf9839
7 жыл бұрын
On the one Hand, JKR as the author and Inventor of those stories has every right to add to her stories and also to Change them, so if she says something is "fact" in the HP-universe then it is fact. Period. If she should decide today that Hermione was black, Ron was bisexual, Lavender Brown was actually a Boy and Sibyl Trelawy was a sphinx, then it is fact. On the other hand, a whole different issue is if we buy it that the made up on the spot facts she reveals in interviews or the feeble explanations she gives on Pottermore to cover up some of the plotholes in her stories are really all things she intended all along. Also, a "fact" about the story in a book is not worth anything if there is not the slightest hint at it in the story itself and the reader has no possibility to even suppose that "fact" might be possible.
@dominickeijzer5844
5 жыл бұрын
1: "I think it was pretty obvious" -Lockhart 2: He said bloody quite a few times. 3: Guess what, that's what a THEORY is. 4: One point to you. 5: This was revealed and is now famous for starting a trend, also she said she, to quote your source, "Always THOUGHT of Dumbledore as gay". It's confirmed at this point, so second point. 6: It doesn't say he does it himself. 7: I think it was obvious, after 17 years, it's a lost hope. 8: They literally reconciled at the start of book 7. 9: I'd think this would have been obvious. Anyone trivial was on it. 10: It's rather obvious, only one Hallow could likely detect the other. 2 out of 10.
@PlasticAstroBoy
7 жыл бұрын
This is a very beautifully produced video, it made me feel quite nostalgic for my favourite childhood story, and shed new light on old characters.
@rohanpalavali2932
7 жыл бұрын
"My editor wouldn't let any of my characters swear". So we're just gonna pretend Molly Weasley wasn't a character in the battle of Hogwarts?
@sheilas1283
7 жыл бұрын
That was really interesting! Love the music too.
@AgnosticProle
7 жыл бұрын
I think that Neville is more brave than harry because if someone wants to kill you it's not awfully brave to fight back. I know that harry was very brave but voldemort gave Neville a chance to save himself and he said no.
@alapalacasual
7 жыл бұрын
This was a great video. Your set-up of the facts are great and the inclusion of quotes and the beautiful pictures and music are absolutely amazing. And you definitely hit home on the no speaking thing. Kudos, friend. Kudos.
@shoresean1237
7 жыл бұрын
7:26: "Wizard now has limited invisibility."
@aarowtheblacksmith789
7 жыл бұрын
Some of these definitely are revealed in the books, even if they're vague. And all of these are just things Rowling came up with for the interviews. And I wanted to say something about Dumbledore being gay. It seems to me that him being gay was an afterthought she had, primarily for the sake of gay pride. I don't mean to sound homophobic, but that's just kind of how it seems to me. In the first chapter of the first book, Dumbledore says to McGonagall "It's a good thing it's dark. I haven't blushed so much since Madam Pomfrey said she liked my earmuffs." Why would he blush at a compliment from Madam Pomfrey if he's gay? It's possible that he was merely joking, but I don't feel that he would completely make that up. Plus, if Rowling had in mind that he was gay at the time, she wouldn't have put that. Perhaps I'm reading too much into it, as that isn't much of a real indication of his sexuality, but even so.
@user-kv7pr7xs6k
7 жыл бұрын
Actually, there's a theory that Dumbledore could cast himself invisible(and see people under a spell/or cloak of invisibility) whenever he pleased.
@Lg.sidequest
7 жыл бұрын
Holy crap, the part about Neville's parents!!😭😭😭😭😭 my heart💔
@MrFwufyClipsHD
7 жыл бұрын
beautifully done video, the music choice was great and gave the facts more emotional weight than they would have if persented differently. the editing was really good too, and the facts where actually interesting so good job.
@hannah59xx_funimate23
6 жыл бұрын
1:32 Molly Weasley swears in the Deathly Hallows though... also I knew all of these but great video! :)
@jamesmcgrath1952
7 жыл бұрын
Here's the thing, it's a work of fiction so if it's not down on paper (in the actual published book), it's not so (canon). J. K.'s musings are so subject to change it's like watching a weather vane in the PC wind. Whatever's the going PC trend is at the time.
@SadisticSenpai61
7 жыл бұрын
Um, #2 isn't a revelation outside the books. In the books, they swear by Merlin. And Ron swears by Merlin (and his various body parts) all the fucking time. Hence, in the HP world, he swears a lot. If he were a muggle, he'd be using the swear words we use.
@frigginsweet80
7 жыл бұрын
It's sad about Neville's parents, but when his grandmother finally see's him as a man is really touching
@chrisj403
7 жыл бұрын
You can tell she made Dumbledore gay just to make herself seem like a better and open minded person to the public. There are no hints of him being gay in the books, he's never attracted to any guy and it's never explored upon.
@beaniesooo2559
7 жыл бұрын
Although I knew it already, my nose still turned sour at #7...
@MegCazalet
7 жыл бұрын
I got all tears-eyed at several of these.
@itstheberries.6196
7 жыл бұрын
I'm still mad at Grindelwald for becoming it already being evil. He and Dumbledore would have been great together.
@EqualOpportunityDestoroya
7 жыл бұрын
I always thought of Dumbledore as some holy man like the Dalai Lama or Ghandi. However, I am not the author so it is up to her.
@mylittleponyrulz
7 жыл бұрын
Actually in the books it does state that Harry and Dudely do in fact reconcile since Harry told his aunt and uncle to leave their house to keep them safe which in turn earned Dudley's respect and gave him a head nod before he left the house. So wham bam thank you ma'am.
@m.r.cerney3608
7 жыл бұрын
I always assumed Dumbledore could sense Harry's thoughts as he was very skilled in occlumecy, which is why Snape could also sense Harry when he was sneaking around.
@MrLizardLab
7 жыл бұрын
The fact that Ron swears a lot is pretty clear in the books, the fact that Harry arranges Snape's portrait to be in the headmasters office is stated in the books, Neville's parents are explained in detail in the books making it very clear that they cannot recover, Harry and Dudley reconciling is in the books, ..... DID YOU EVEN READ THE BOOKS?
@lautz73
7 жыл бұрын
In the 7th book it's clearly stated that Dudley didn't think that Harry was a waste of space after saving him from the dementors in book 5. That alone would have helped Dudley to set aside the feud and later become more friendly to Harry. Even to the point of seeing and talking to Harry later in life. Fact 4. I could see the people in charge awarding Harry and Ron a diploma (or whatever is given to Hogwarts students) after the defeat of Voldy. Even asking Harry to be the Headmaster later in life. The level of magic displayed by Harry, Ron and Hermy (name used in book 5 when talking to Hagrid's half brother) during the hunt for Horcruxes would have been enough to award then at least that. Harry would have made sure that Snape got a portrait when he became Headmaster (which I believe would have happened in Harry's later years, after his children left Hogwarts). I don't think that Dumbledore would have needed to use a spell to know that Harry was there. He knew that it would be in Harry's nature to be close to his friends in their time of need.
@gallpingice1690
7 жыл бұрын
Uttermost did you play the piano for the video? Anyways thanks for this, it was really kool (yes I meant kool)! :D
@Gabriel-jh3lx
7 жыл бұрын
There are two kinda sad facts about Patronuses, too... Remus' Patronus is a wolf. Not a werewolf, but a wild, gentle wolf. He usually casts a non-corporeal Patronus on purpose just because he doesn't want people to know. And Hagrid may not have a Patronus.
@AniketPatil-nk1vw
7 жыл бұрын
Very calm n soothing piano. Also, nice editing
@DavidbarZeus1
7 жыл бұрын
On number four, it never made sense to me that Harry, who above all else wanted to be normal, would simply accept becoming an Auror without graduating like 99% of the Auror Corps. Number 8 is at least hinted at in the Deathly Hallows book, as the two DO part on relatively good terms.
@Namron9797
7 жыл бұрын
I always thought Dumbledore could sense someone was NOT there, and that's how he knew someone was there. He could see or feel an absence, like a remnant of magic that shouldn't be there or should. Kind of like how he found the traps in the cave where he found Voldemorts locket horcrux. And he isn't alarmed by it because he knows who possesses the only object that can do that.
@jacobedwards207
7 жыл бұрын
Well if it's not in the books/movies it's not canon. Een if the author herself says it, it doesn't matter unless it is actually in the writing. These "facts" are for us, the readers, to interpret.
@MissyMona
7 жыл бұрын
I wish J.K would stop constantly commenting on her past work. She does it to the point where no one can even have fun making theories about her work because she confirms of denies everything. It's just annoying, I don't mind Dumbledore being gay but it also doesn't matter what his sexuality was anyways. He was cool, how does this impact the story?
@modrozelenaalga9607
7 жыл бұрын
7:10 - Another clue for famous "Ronbledore" theory. Dumbledore also said he doesn't care about his rewards as long as they don't remove him from chocolate frogs.
@Shawn4815162342
7 жыл бұрын
I wanna know how the portraits are alive? How can someone who has died seemingly continue to live through a portrait? All the portraits in the Headmaster's office can talk, sleep, travel to other portraits, etc...so, are they even technically dead?
Пікірлер: 1 М.