Foucault has been very successful in cutting and opening up the living body of the power structure eg Govt, being the heart of any system and letting us the citizens to look, understand and know our place in it, as subjects our positions is quite compromised and it is suffocating at times to know so much control has been exercised without us being conscious about it. Thank you for unpacking.
@farhinkabir8475
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Prof. Thorsby for the time and effort you have put into simplifying the complexity of Foucault. Best wishes.
@thisnameisok
10 жыл бұрын
This is a fantastic grounding, thank you for sharing your presentation and deck. Just one minor thing- please consider making your deck so your content isn't obscured by you on cam (which is actually good to have) :)
@plazdiquehardt
10 жыл бұрын
This is excellent. You should include links to your Prezi in the description.
@EricKwameAdae
5 жыл бұрын
This is a brilliant introduction to Foucault's ideas. Many thanks for a great presentation.
@cheri238
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Foucault was an incredible philosopher.
@nafeesyoutube9996
Жыл бұрын
Sir great...i appreciate.... knowledge should remain available for every one
@gokucloud746
8 жыл бұрын
Wonderful introduction to Foucault! This was quite enlightening and enjoyable. I'm curious if Foucault was inspired to these ideas by the events in the War, or if he always had a deeper understanding of the world before that...
@zzx1118
9 жыл бұрын
Thank you, it's very helpful, I'm a art history student and currently work out critic theory. i like your video.
@postcodeox278
4 жыл бұрын
16:10 I have always wanted to live in the past... that prision punishment scene... has changed my mind
@cendilweylun9556
3 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation, Thank you for your service.
@Deleuzeshammerflow
8 жыл бұрын
Have you read the essay by Deleuze on Societies of Control? He argues it is a misreading to say we live in a disciplinary society, we, he argues, live in a biopolitical society of control
@PhilosophicalTechne
8 жыл бұрын
+Deleuzeshammerflow No, but I certainly will. Thanks for posting
@Deleuzeshammerflow
8 жыл бұрын
Cool, it's a quick read and fairly lucid by Deleuze standards, I hope you enjoy it.
@waterkingdavid
7 жыл бұрын
What I find interesting is not so much power, not so much its nature, causes and distribution but our individual motives for wanting to understand it. I was attracted to Foucalt's concern with the nature of subjectivity but was disappointed that though he seems to be right on track that this is where we need to look he seems to still not "go there" so to speak. The question "what is subjectivity" is what I believe is the question we really are all asking. Foucalt points there but then seems to back off.
@stephen0793
5 жыл бұрын
Deleuze doesn't say disciplinary society is a misreading, he has it has been replaced by a society of control
@leonardbasic8341
8 жыл бұрын
Very nice presentation.. I enjoyed listening to it.. There is a large difference between Usa and European states where European states are still dominated by "Ethnos" (as long is the "ethnos" is untouched - they are liberal and the civil society can flourish) and they will stay like this...(with all the limits and flaws) It is a certain advantage for Usa to have something else behind the screen but it can be disastrous as well if the binding force behind the usa becomes something different then self proclaimed idology... (like it was many times in the past..)...
@GeniusisCommon
6 жыл бұрын
You are an amazing Professor. Anyone that can break down Foucault the way you do is genius. You have such a cool laid back style, yet you make it very interesting as well. Great work. #Genius #Geniusiscommon www.geniusiscommon.com
@knowone3031
2 жыл бұрын
Like ur topics.. Appreciate ur work.. Thanks These topics very interesting.. Hospitals and control is a big one.. If u a listener Id like to speak to u.. The "body" is a page of text.. Im sure u understand
@Mr.hyde1886
4 жыл бұрын
Was not expecting my mans to have style like he did in that first picture.
@TheModernHermeticist
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting
@bongimabaso1534
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for an amazing lecture 🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦
@MsHistoryseeker
5 жыл бұрын
FYI, the title of the book is not "Discipline and Punishment" but it is "Discipline and Punish"!!!
@AdaptiveApeHybrid
4 жыл бұрын
Great content dude. Thank you
@Beyonder1881
9 жыл бұрын
Hi Professor Thorsby- thank you for the interesting lecture on Foucault and the art of governing (which is what I am trying to get my head around). I was wondering where you got the helpful flowchart on governmental continuity from (around 59:00)? I would like to adapt it, but would need a reference. Thank you in advance. Simon
@sherhou7491
4 жыл бұрын
I would listen you talk in depth of any topic
@cherry27822
9 жыл бұрын
Hey Mark any possibility for you to make a video to introduce structuration theory by Giddens?
@humaali8265
4 жыл бұрын
Sunny plz cover structuration
@humaali8265
4 жыл бұрын
I mean mark plz do video on structuration
@aimanreyaz2034
9 жыл бұрын
What is this software? The notes are very good and highly organized. Please anybody just tell me the name in which Mr Thorsby has described his ideas, with the help of these images and maps.
@MADDOGMAPPERS
8 жыл бұрын
Brilliant, thank you.
@7azzarFazzar
10 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@andreykugel-polozov6542
4 жыл бұрын
Antonio Gramsci is much more coherent on the relationship between power and ideology
@Johnconno
4 жыл бұрын
The inevitable first chapter of Discipline and Punish...
@timblackburn1593
6 жыл бұрын
Governmentality 49m
@littlecartoony2k
4 жыл бұрын
I want English subtitles pls TT
@lolitavat798
Жыл бұрын
Whuch is the book he speaks about , the one of the execution on the church of paris
@himanshu9559
8 ай бұрын
Discipline and Punish
@ravichikram1642
5 жыл бұрын
Anyone explain the history of sexuality by michel foucault........it's very difficult to understand in english
@meridonmage9076
5 жыл бұрын
Foucault.. Systems & their logisms.. Language as a means to shape new ways.. wich aren't hard structured systems..
@jessesmoot1285
5 жыл бұрын
?
@sayyidummersameer4467
8 жыл бұрын
thanks
@astrazenica7783
7 жыл бұрын
What presentation software is used?
@ROY4Lproductions
6 жыл бұрын
Adam Smith prezi
@Hrainbow92
8 жыл бұрын
Just wondered whether you would say that he has a theory of power, if so how would you briefly summarise it? Thanks!
@eupraxis1
10 жыл бұрын
Discipline and Punish, not Discipline and Punishment.
@brianclark4796
10 жыл бұрын
shut up
@eupraxis1
10 жыл бұрын
***** I stand punish.
@stellario82
5 жыл бұрын
In pursuing Foucault's line of inquiry this video fails shoer to provide a fundamental definition, which is "power". Without that, Foucault explanations are theological explanations that are tantamount to say that the world is managed by the Divine Providence, and everything must reflect a fundamental commitment to unravel the work of the divine providence. Despite what this professor says, Foucault offers no interesting analysis of society, it is a marginal one, and most of the time historically groundless.
@johnjohnson9585
10 жыл бұрын
Hi Mark, thanks for this video. I had one question though, you say the role of government is to do what's best for the country's economy, but surely it also has a role in cultural, environmental, spiritual spheres? For instance legalising gay marriage has a small effect on the economy, and is probably better understood outside the economic realm? Or passing environmental protection laws might damage the economy. And even laws made by government to ostensibly affect the country's economy, are often made based on moral/political ideology rather than that is 'best' for the economy? How does that fit in?
@samiurkhan
10 жыл бұрын
It isn't so much towards the economy but instead to make the population more productive. This productivity can be seen in economics but also manifested in other ways like overall happiness of the population.
@ivandate9972
9 жыл бұрын
Mark ... i wonder, if in general Foucault can proof that some essential part of our life are only social constructed overtime, why in detail he describe that only how to do is changing ? that's mean he believe the signified still fix there with us ? ... by that he is never a post structural
@prenuptials5925
6 жыл бұрын
"nee-chee"
@Etatdesiege1979
3 жыл бұрын
Can you also give me the phonetics of “pedantic”?
@keltoi2000
9 жыл бұрын
When you talk about unusual punishment in the United States, you should mention slavery
@fluxkit
8 жыл бұрын
I don't think the institution of slavery was generally views as a form of punishment.
@ImperiumSerama
7 жыл бұрын
Diane Martin Slavery wasn't isolated to the US. Are you suggesting it was?
@Godsgraceish
7 жыл бұрын
Darth Erebus, Diane was speaking directly to what was stated by the person in the KZitem video pertaining to unusual punishment. So why are you asking this question? It seems that you are trying to distract away from the point of the question, which has always been the problem, as it it pertains to the US acknowledging the impact of slavery.
@matthewfrazier9254
6 жыл бұрын
this might be about the Prison System using unpaid labor guys... chill
@jessieje8218
7 жыл бұрын
To actually equate being flayed, drawn and quartered, to having doctors, teachers and time tables... Only the sincerest of pessimists could ever bother to make that conclusion.
@matthewfrazier9254
6 жыл бұрын
Jessie Je who’s equating ?
@ucokalpigari3933
4 жыл бұрын
@@matthewfrazier9254 Foucault equated them. He thought that it was all just control. Foucault never seem to get over his animus against psychologists and psychiatrists after the first of several suicide attempts.
@ucokalpigari3933
4 жыл бұрын
It took him about two sentences to use the word 'problematic'. Everything is problematic to the postmodern identitarian Left, except their own brazen power grabs. I also see that you forgot to mention that he was a one-time supporter of Stalin, a later supporter of Mao, a huge fanboy of the sadistic novels of the Marquis De Sade and a child of incredible wealth and privilege who drove a Jaguar...while supporting Mao. His political affiliations are largely totalitarian and, as a practitioner of S&M, a power junkie. Nothing exists except power for Foucault, which is interesting considering his preference for violent S&M pleasures.
@robford3211
Жыл бұрын
@ucokalpigari3933 what does the phrase: he was a one-time supporter of Stalin - what does it even mean? I am a supporter of Stalin when he defended Bulgakov's novel of Master and Margarita and called him a genius. Have you practiced bdsm seriously or a Porn hub lover finding your epistemology via dilettante hearsay??
@michaelrussell7806
Ай бұрын
@@robford3211 I mean it is true Foucault was born to immense wealth. He also had a predilection for BDSM, how that relates to authoritarianism isn't really clear. The legacy that Foucault left in modern academia is another issue, one that I think has been to its detriment. Most people in academia who worship Foucault also happen to be pricks.
@lolitavat798
Жыл бұрын
37:34
@awhodothey
6 жыл бұрын
1:07:15 Reagan started subsidies in the 70's? Haha, what?!
@sillysad3198
4 жыл бұрын
how to speak for 1h17m and say nothing.
@EsatBargan
Ай бұрын
Jones Nancy Jones Mark Smith Amy
@Onlyhas99
6 жыл бұрын
Foucault. The Captain Obvious of philosophy.
@starstationearth
5 жыл бұрын
You sound drunk mate.
@lukastaylor9544
5 жыл бұрын
Paul Bloor not really
@mrPug-wz5zz
2 жыл бұрын
His voice is very very annoying, but I'm trying to listen to entire presentation
@WafaDahbali
6 жыл бұрын
Hard to concentrate with so many "um"s in this lecture.
@augustolesen4186
6 жыл бұрын
Sort yourself out
@bigfriki
7 жыл бұрын
Big big thank you Mark. Great video, helped a lot :-)
Пікірлер: 95