Your survey is crap. Your population figures are way out. With some cities you've included the population of neighbouring boroughs. Liverpool where I live has a population just shy of 500k, not 900k. With Leeds you showed a photo of Bradford and Knaresborough! Manchester 10th place? You've only included the city council boundaries and not the urban areas, whereas Birmingham, Liverpool, Nottingham and Bristol you haven't. Put short, your survey is plainly inaccurate and inconsistent.
@grahamturner6119
2 жыл бұрын
,your right /// good fellow
@grahamturner6119
2 жыл бұрын
No this is a load of crap
@MATTY110981
2 жыл бұрын
Some of the results given are the urban populations which include surrounding areas. And some are just metropolitan boroughs population. The inconstancies are embarrassing.
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
I've worked what he's based this on. Liverpool: He's included the boroughs of Knowsley, Sefton and Wirral. Parts of Knowsley and Sefton are arguably suburbs of Liverpool, but Southport and Formby (both in Sefton) definitely aren't, nor is any of the Wirral. Manchester: The City of Manchester only. Birmingham: The whole of the West Midlands county, including Coventry, a city he also used separately. Nottingham: The defined urban area which includes towns in Derbyshire such as Heanor, Ilkeston and Ripley. None of these should define the city population. He also thinks Sunderland has a bigger population than Newcastle and Bradford, neither of which made this laughable list. I think what he's also done is get his stats from Wikipedia, without properly looking into them. As for his photos, well in addition to the errors I've mentioned, he featured Bristol's Park Street in the photos of Sheffield, a photo of New York in London's, and an overseas campus of Nottingham University in Nottingham's. All in all a badly made, inaccurate video that maybe he'd like to comment on.
@alfresco8442
2 жыл бұрын
@@markcollinson5665 Spot on. Liverpool's urban sprawl stops abruptly at Thornton/Blundellsands/Aintree. You've got to cross open countryside to include any more
@paulrenshaw3938
2 жыл бұрын
You’ve done Nottingham urban area but not Manchesters, there urban area is 2.5 million Nottingham city is only 330,000
@brothersman524
2 жыл бұрын
Yes they got it confused. If they are doing the city population, Nottingham will not be in the top 10 but if they include the Urban Area then it will be in the top 10. Nottingham city boundary is smaller than Bradford, Leicester, Coventry, Bristol and Sheffield but Nottingham Urban Area is bigger than all of the cities that I have mentioned
@paulsmirk2046
2 жыл бұрын
Leeds, Sheffield, Leicester, Bristol, Nottingham are bigger cities than Manchester? Some bad research gone on here
@RayReallyWants400SubsMuchLove
2 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@liam8682
2 жыл бұрын
Complete nonsense I’m sure Manchester is the 2nd city now and Newcastle is definitely more populous than Sunderland. Where did this info come from?
@webbzz91
2 жыл бұрын
Manchester is nowhere near the second city. Its less than half the size of Birmingham and has a much lower GDP.
@gazriley624
Жыл бұрын
Don't be fooled by Manchester it's all hype! it's NOT the second city at all that's what they want you to believe. don't be fooled by "Greater Manchester" that's not manchester itself plus they have made the county far too big and swallowed up Bolton and Wigan ( Lancashire ) and Sale and other towns from Cheshire it's a farce even Salford isn't in manchester. Leeds, Liverpool and Glasgow are all bigger cities
@MATTY110981
2 жыл бұрын
A bit odd that you have tallied Manchester's population as the borough and not its urban population. But you have with London, Birmingham and Liverpool.
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly this.
@garethwilliams976
2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely. The post is worthless nonsense
@garethwilliams976
2 жыл бұрын
Complete rubbish! The population of the City of London is tiny! You have gone only for the Urban area. Why not do this for the urban areas of the other cities. If you are going for the population of London within the M25 why not include the population of Greater Manchester which would make it 2 or 3?
@garyrigby21
9 ай бұрын
Liverpool is bigger than most people realise it is! it's massive
@tsungiraichiramba
2 жыл бұрын
Pure crap, get your facts right
@MrTSK27
2 жыл бұрын
You quote London...Greater London.. but the rest are smaller local authority areas. Greater Manchester is 2.8 million in ten boroughs...A pointless exercise then.
@ga3680
Жыл бұрын
This video is riddled with inaccuracies. For example, Glasgow is thd 3rd largest city in the UK.
@57bananaman
2 жыл бұрын
This video is full of disinformation ... it consistently confuses the population within city boundaries with the population within the "urban area" (which would include towns, villages and settlements outside the city boundary but part of the same built-up area). For some reason it includes the entire population of the West Midlands conurbation as living in "Birmingham" but it fails to include the entire population of the Greater Manchester conurbation as being residents of "Manchester". With Leicester it seems to think that the entire population of the outer suburbs (Wigston, Oadby, Birstall etc.) live within the city boundary and it makes some inane comment about the city being very crowded, All very amateur. And that street used at 7:00 to illustrate Sheffield is actually Park Street in Bristol!!
@richardhussey7641
2 жыл бұрын
I agree Roger. The population of Birmingham is about 1 million. The figure quoted here is the whole of the old West Midlands county. The population of Liverpool is about half a million, not 900000. The population of Nottingham is a 300 000 odd. Bristol just under half a million. The figures for London, Manchester, Leeds and Glasgow, however I think are about right.
@garylouk8776
Жыл бұрын
More people live in Sunderland than Newcastle? Don’t think that’s right
@himthatis6698
2 жыл бұрын
wtf does "...the home to the world's oldest football, competing in the F A" mean? @ 6.36
@shay4261
Жыл бұрын
im from sheffield. its saying that sheffield wednesday is the oldest ever football team
@himthatis6698
Жыл бұрын
@@shay4261 He didn't say club, he said football. As if there is an actual football that has been doing the rounds since time immemorial in the FA(what?). Such and odd way of saying that. So poorly said. Also, Sheffield FC is recognised as the oldest club in the world, still playing, by FIFA.
@Rohan-ng6ll
2 жыл бұрын
do u just make up the numbers mate? A simple google search shows updated populations of these cities so I have no idea how you’ve got it this wrong
@jonathanhall7334
2 жыл бұрын
Hmm the Pictures of Leeds included one of Bradford and one of Knaresborough
@jamieharman4494
Жыл бұрын
I was gonna say the same thing.
@shay4261
Жыл бұрын
one of the ones in sheffield was a picture of bristol
@Glasgowurbanwildlife
Жыл бұрын
total rubbish! liverpool doesnt have over 900k population! you have put som cities metro populations and others council population! total inaccurate
@Titot182
2 жыл бұрын
Manchester - great football clubs... posts the insides of the Emirates Stadium! Didn't know that College Green was also in Sheffield!? I feel confused
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
It's not, it's in Bristol. One of many inaccuracies in this badly put together video.
@Titot182
2 жыл бұрын
@@markcollinson5665 Yeah, a shitload of the other vids are done so equally badly. I've been sardonically posting on every ill-researched video. Ironically, having worked in Bristol for 5 years, I never really bothered to go up college green. The borderline was drawn at the bear pit!
@brothersman524
2 жыл бұрын
I am from Nottingham and this is incorrect. You took the Nottingham Urban Area not the city population. The city population is around 330.000 which is 14th/15th largest city but the Urban Area actually shoots it up to 7th largest
@jimsimpson1006
2 жыл бұрын
Biggest surprise for me is that Manchester is only at number 10.
@webbzz91
2 жыл бұрын
Manchester is a lot smaller than people think.
@gazriley624
Жыл бұрын
@@webbzz91 correct
@grahamsmith9541
2 жыл бұрын
WRONG City of London is one of the UK's SMALLEST Cities. City of London has a population of around 9,000. London is made up of 2 Cities and 32 Boroughs. The other City in London. Since 1539 City of Westminster has a population of around 261,000. The population quoted in the video is that of Greater London which is not a City.
@GabrielDertzer
8 ай бұрын
This list is completely wrong. London isnt a city. The City of London only has a population of about 7,000.
@clintrobert9131
2 жыл бұрын
so london has 5701 people per square metre????? hahahaha
@MarkPitsmoorOwl
Жыл бұрын
Nottingham doesn’t have a population no we’re near 700k and Liverpool isn’t that big by population Google it most of these videos are wrong the top two is right but the rest is wrong
@adam70628
Жыл бұрын
This is wrong on so many levels you cant compile a list of populations of UK cities wheres some are populations within city limits and others that includes urban and metro areas and then go on to list them in order of population this is not the way to do it as you can see Nottingham is not bigger than Glasgow and there are other examples on this video
@free..to..air..
2 жыл бұрын
Surely cities with a bigger environmental radius will have a bigger population...on that basis...Manchester must have a greater count than Liverpool
@gazriley624
2 жыл бұрын
Nope, Liverpool is bigger
@johnny2hats329
2 жыл бұрын
No, it's not that 'we won't find any cities from Northern Ireland', it's that 'you' didn't find any cities from Northern Ireland in your limited research. There's well over half a million in Belfast.
@robfisher3578
2 жыл бұрын
Laugh at Stoke!full of druggie everywhere !!
@tsungiraichiramba
2 жыл бұрын
Coventry was historically in Warwickshire and it’s part of the West Midlands county now
@muhdiofficial2190
2 жыл бұрын
London is amazingly beautiful, greetings from Muhdi Official🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@rinkydinkmcruk
Жыл бұрын
Take this down, it’s utter nonsense
@grahamwalker1646
2 жыл бұрын
London residents per square metre, really per square metre or square kilometre? Interesting that you've put a picture of Knaresborough in the piece on Leeds. To my knowledge Knaresborough is in a completely different county to Leeds, North Yorkshire as opposed to West Yorkshire. Try check everything is correct before you put it out there.
@barneyrubble8590
2 жыл бұрын
The population in these cities has already gone up since this was made...
@thanhphomanchester8128
Жыл бұрын
Manchester is Blue
@m.goodengumman3941
Жыл бұрын
Fifteen minutes cities next. 😎
@lukefuller9726
Жыл бұрын
This isn’t correct
@SameerKhalid.
2 жыл бұрын
Newcastle has a bigger population than Sunderland.
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@SameerKhalid.
2 жыл бұрын
@@markcollinson5665 it’s really strange this video I don’t know what it’s based on the Newcastle city council say that the population was 300,820 (2019) and on the Sunderland city council website it said they had a population of 277,962.
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
@@SameerKhalid. Exactly, and Sunderland's population includes outlying towns such as Washington and Houghton-le-Spring. The actual city population is near 175k.
@DavyRo
2 жыл бұрын
Sunderland Borough has a bigger population than Newcastle & if you're taking the actual places Edinburgh has 1 million in its vicinity. I've worked every big city in the UK. I'm from Sunderland so I know both Newcastle & Sunderland well. I've just finished working in Edinburgh for 5 months & it's easily bigger than Newcastle & more populated. Newcastle is highly built up but only in a small area but they've got North Tyneside & Gateshead next to it so that trebles the local population. Sheffield has the largest population for a single city by the way
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
@@DavyRo His population quotes used urban areas when it suited. Newcastle has a population of 302k, Sunderland including Washington and Houghton, both is 278k. Birmingham has the biggest city population by a long way (outside London) although Sheffield does have a high population.
@nickmendes5458
2 жыл бұрын
Strange use of numbers, giving strange results!
@maximumtrains7959
Жыл бұрын
Glasgows population is 1.8 million if we’re counting euro populations as you have with Nottingham Liverpool Birmingham and London or 633,000 if it is the city population
@Monerman
2 жыл бұрын
What about Reading? It has more than 400,000 people. Would that not be considered populous?
@anthonywilliams5398
Жыл бұрын
Need to consider like for like not a mix of population within city boundaries and others including their urban areas. Best and most accurate measure of actual size includes the urban area.
@jimmypage1
2 жыл бұрын
Complete rubbish. where on earth did you get your figures?
@bobsox7522
2 жыл бұрын
i suggest the maker of this goes back to school to learn how to count
@robfisher3578
2 жыл бұрын
Sheffield full of graffiti every where
@gazriley624
2 жыл бұрын
the only correct list of UK cities on KZitem
@bossman1905
2 жыл бұрын
This is not including refugees ,illegal immigrants!! And the poor British homeless citizens on our streets
@raakestaarjustice2831
2 жыл бұрын
Such tiny cities 😬
@gazriley624
2 жыл бұрын
Spot on
@majidrafiq9848
Жыл бұрын
Dublin? York city?
@garyrigby21
9 ай бұрын
York is tiny
@alexkyle1828
2 жыл бұрын
ffs
@Beltoftruth.
2 жыл бұрын
I hope some day you make a video about the cities or towns in UK with lot of Muslim population. Who can tell me this please?.
@jimmywhite8112
2 жыл бұрын
Luton has got to be in top 10 of large Muslim areas
@barneyrubble8590
2 жыл бұрын
Bradford😱
@edgarmoss-brown1840
2 жыл бұрын
And nottingham also is a big educational city with all the universities and colleges that are here
@gazriley624
Жыл бұрын
Spot on this list! You got it correct
@johnwilson3842
Жыл бұрын
Rubbish
@LearningPointsDD
2 жыл бұрын
Great information, friend. Your video is very interesting. Thanks.
@keyvan6660
2 жыл бұрын
Please make a video about Canada🌹🌹🌹
@richardwills-woodward5340
2 жыл бұрын
This is wholly incorrect. If measured by urbanised landmass (as all other countries in the world do) with centres where the surrounding area is dependent on them, and stop measuring cities that are actually suburbs of other cities which is an historic anomaly, then the largest cities are as follows: 1) London: 24 million 2) Manchester metropolitan area 5.7 million 3) Birmingham metro area 4.8 million 4) Glasgow metro area 2.5 million 5) Leeds: 2.4 million 6) Liverpool: 2.2 million 7) Newcastle (which includes Sunderland economically speaking): 2 million 8) Sheffield 1.85 million
@Christian-uj1mq
2 жыл бұрын
Where in the world did you get these figures, pretty sure birmingham is is like 4.2m and manchester is 3.8 m, not sure about the others but the only way manchester is 5.8 is if u included liverpool as part of the metro area otherwise i have no idea where u found 2 milllion people around manchester. And isnt 23 million like the whole of southern england?
@richardwills-woodward5340
2 жыл бұрын
@@Christian-uj1mq The figures are based on our property company and others' combined data that shows the commuter flows and incomes of those flows set against the contiguous suburbanised landmass. In 2020, the economic footprint whereby land is contiguously urbanised and economically dependent on its core city gives the numbers above. In fact, Birmingham is slightly larger IF Telford was connected to Birmingham's suburban area and it almost is. That would give 5 million for Birmingham. Manchester does not need to include Liverpool. Liverpool and Manchester combined would see 8 million people or so. Manchester holds most of Lancashire, Cheshire, a western portion of Derbyshire plus Greater Manchester itself etc. This alone is in excess of 5.1 million. That is before we include illegal migrants or the economically dependent (for value added, non-state jobs) of Stoke. Birmingham does not have the transport infrastructure to pose any footprint on this area, Manchester however, does. We suspect that this is to do with the rail transport being too poor via Wolverhampton but remains to be proven. We have done this journey on research trips and it is clear why no-one would do it. That said, North Stoke is more strongly attached economically and is physically connected via the Cheshire suburbs. It is however, much poorer, whilst the joint second wealthiest part of England sits right on its border with Prestbury, Wilmslow etc. The numbers you refer to are the decades outdated 'city region' numbers which for a property developer are as irrelevant as a water bucket and well when you have tap water. We have to commission and do our own research as the powers that be in the UK refuse to measure cities by their urban area and economic footprint and rely on borders from the last century. We cannot afford to do this. So matter what Wiki (always incorrect) or other sources say, they are not measuring like for like. They list Tokyo with [all] its suburbs but only include London's borough map area - in the same list! Totally unhelpful. Regards London, it is the Southeast suburbs that are physically connected to the urbanised landmass and are one suburbanised area. The last 20 years has seen vast numbers of areas that were once separate but in the commuter-belt, join. All this from new-build (but ugly) development. Most of Southeast England is now one urban area via fingers and joins with the second largest urban rail network in the world meshing it together (after Tokyo). It is actually quite astonishing in global terms, but no-one will shout about it because the British carp and complain all the time. As property developers, this knowledge and analysis is a real help. If you want to see for yourself with the publicly available mapping, go to Bing Maps (not Google as its resolution is much poorer at low level), turn off the layers so you have just the satellite (without names showing), turn up the brightness on your computer, and just watch what happens as you zoom into places that from above look green. Houses - vast numbers of them make themselves clearer as you zoom in - most were not there 20-25 years ago. Kent has seen the largest increase. Go to Surrey, Hampshire and follow the fingers and mansions sat in an acre to two - you will see what would give most English a heart attack if they bothered to undertake such an anorak exercise! A Southeast England that has become London - and all urbanised area is dependent on the capital by majority of its income earners. We have a map where the dark the colour, the higher the percentage of workers and another for income. All of Southeast England is dark to mid-colour. It was shocking how wide and how dependent the area is. Tokyo, New York of course already do this. We have to obtain assistance from others to get this done. There was one reference to data carried out by the former mayor of London that stated London was 21.7 million people in reality and whilst not administratively part of it, must pretend it is so and work with the neighbouring authorities. This was how planning should be. Alas, no such brains now. Low density, leafy suburbs and detached houses explain a lot of the expansion - all fast and all recent.
@paulweston5665
2 жыл бұрын
You've got this list absolutely spot on 💪
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
No they haven't, not even remotely.
@paulweston5665
2 жыл бұрын
@@markcollinson5665 All depends which City you're from.
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
@@paulweston5665 It depends on accuracy not how much you want to big up your own city.
@LearningCanteen
2 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear it!
@gazriley624
2 жыл бұрын
True Paul they did get it spot on
@steveharrison7328
2 жыл бұрын
This list of cities is in the correct order. well done
@markcollinson5665
2 жыл бұрын
If you did some real research you'd realise it isn't. The inconsistencies are unreal.
@steveharrison7328
2 жыл бұрын
@@markcollinson5665 as i said this list of cities is in the correct order
@grahamsmith9541
2 жыл бұрын
@@steveharrison7328 Only in your imagination.
@steveharrison7328
2 жыл бұрын
@@grahamsmith9541 eh? what are you on about? do your research before you comment
@grahamsmith9541
2 жыл бұрын
@@steveharrison7328 well first off London at first place. City of London has a population of around 9,000. Should not be in this list. I lived in London. It's YOU that needs to do research before commenting.
Пікірлер: 119