Get Zeiss 16-35mm Amazon ➭ geni.us/H1Tg03 eBay ➭ ebay.to/2kmNjUj Get the f2.8 G Master Amazon ➭ geni.us/rGEoCgb eBay ➭ ebay.to/2mh8ho1
@kamelbitar7105
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Oma for hosting me, it was a pleasure :D
@arnoldpraesent174
4 жыл бұрын
Review Timeline - Thank you for having that in your clips - I'm missing it at many other clips on youtube - especially for reviews!
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
I believe the timeline is very important so you can skip the parts that you don't care about. Lens Flare test for example means nothing to me but I include it in my videos cause it matters to some people
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
You might be interested in watching this video as well Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 vs Zeiss 16-35mm f4 DEEP REVIEW kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno
@Mphoto7
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for such a concise review. It's rare that reviewers are this much to the point. I enjoyed your choices of images to compare. They seemed to be quite real world. Personally, I am surprised that an old lens (2014) like the Zeiss is compared (favorably so) to a more modern and more expensive lens like the G master. It's a testament to good lens design. I would like to see if the Zeiss can stand up when compared on an A74.
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching mate. I like to make honest reviews, where I put myself in the viewer's shoes. Check this video as well: Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 vs Zeiss 16-35mm f4 DEEP REVIEW kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno
@desertmav8632
4 жыл бұрын
I’ve had the Zeiss 16-35 for awhile and find it to be a brilliant lens for city and landscape and interiors. It’s sharp as hell and I really appreciate the build quality!
@desertmav8632
4 жыл бұрын
Great comparison vid! I’ve had the Zeiss 16-35 for awhile now and find it to be a brilliant lens for cityscape, landscape and interiors! Good build quality too.
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Good choice! Later I switched to Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 check out this one: Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 vs Zeiss 16-35mm f4 DEEP REVIEW kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno
@ELwow2
4 жыл бұрын
Check AF on your next comparison in low light especially. Great work. I can tell you spend a lot of time.
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your feedback. Thanks for watching Eddy!
@godspeedjourneys2661
5 жыл бұрын
Very well put together video. It was very well thought out, the pacing was nice, production very high and very easy to follow. Well done! Liked and subbed!
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Godspeed Journeys I really appreciate the approach. Glad you like the content. Im currently preparing another video Zeiss vs Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 Shall be done by the end of this month :)
@WOMENOFTROY
2 жыл бұрын
I’m surprised that there was no noticeable additional video stabilization with the Zeiss OSS. I keep hearing that it makes quite a difference with handheld and Sony’s new active mode.
@jiripastrnak1936
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for saving me 900 $ lol. Sucks the zeiss is 1350 lately for some reason but still much cheaper. Love the CF mod on the rings 👍
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Hey Jiri, Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 is open for pre-order now. I Consider myself getting one.
@stakand3972
4 жыл бұрын
You forget the most important test for photographers...against the sun test
@ridhwaanmahomed5657
5 жыл бұрын
Would have been cool to see the difference in Bokeh of the GM at f2.8 Vs the Zeiss at f4.
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
It seems we missed that. The portrait images may be useful at this point
@ridhwaanmahomed5657
5 жыл бұрын
@@OmaGhomrawi Great video though! Thank You!!
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
@@ridhwaanmahomed5657 Thank you for watching Ridhwaan. Have a great time
@Tuan-zj3ie
4 жыл бұрын
Big thank for for your video. I do really like the way you compare, it's very details. I pick the Zeiss over the Gmaster because of weight and cheaper. Subscribed.
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching Tuan! Your feedback means a lot to me :)
@OwenPaugh
5 жыл бұрын
This video helped me a lot. Really appreciate the video comparison part! Awesome job
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching mate! Glad as this video helped.
@jaydarian
4 жыл бұрын
Selling some of my lens for a g master! The gmaster does it all. I do video and photographer for restaurants and real estate.
@jaydarian
4 жыл бұрын
I bought it 🔥
@superfreak_music
4 жыл бұрын
I think for most shooters, the Zeiss would be a no brainer. However, if you are doing professional work, especially interior shots for real estate, etc, I would think you'd want the GM because corner to corner sharpness and no vignetting is so important and those issues are not something you can really fix in post. Other than specific professional lines of work in which you need that, the Zeiss seems like the obvious choice. For a real estate photographer, GM seems to be a considerably better choice. Curious what your thoughts are because I am trying to make this decision at this very moment, and my main purpose for needing a 16mm is for real estate interior. It's also why I just watched your comparison. Feed back appreciated, and great video! Thanks
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching mate :) I started feeling in Love with Tamron 17-28mm f2.8. I bought it first in order to test it and make a review but I decided go keep it and sell Zeiss Check my review here: kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno
@itsjohnzamora
2 жыл бұрын
As a real estate photographer and videographer, I'm still using the Zeiss because I do other kinds of work as well and don't want to sink a whole bunch of my budget into one lens. I've used the GM for real estate and it's clearly the better option, but that f/2.8 is usually not necessary for real estate. When it is, I just rent the GM or a 14mm 1.8.
@marcusanimation100
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Oma, for this very clear comparison. I have two GM lenses but think I will be going for the Zeiss this time...
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Hey Marcus! Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 is out now eventually it looks appealing. Still non made a review on it
@marcusanimation100
5 жыл бұрын
@@OmaGhomrawi Good to know! I await your opinion!
@mir4ge21
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for a very thorough review. Appreciate it. This is the best lens review & makes purchasing decision clear.
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching Raga, it's a pleasure to me. Have a great time bro!
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
I'm currently running a giveaway on the channel. Feel free to join.. kzitem.info/news/bejne/rnxj1oKhhaNkg44
@davidwallace8980
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent comparison. I have the 16-35/4 and I like it. The image quality for both lenses is very close on these 24mp A7III bodies. I wonder if the GM would improve with a 42mp sensor like I use. I was suprised the Zeiss handles flare better. This is very important with wide to ultra wide shooting to me.
@siekierkaKam
4 жыл бұрын
I had A7II and I can confirm that 16-15 f4 is much sharper on 42mp sensor of A7RII
@vladognyanov467
3 жыл бұрын
The best compare ever...thanks a lot!
@OmaGhomrawi
3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@dr_squirrel
5 жыл бұрын
Great video! Very helpful comparison and nice music
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching Aaron. Glad I offered you new information. Best
@chryseass.5143
4 жыл бұрын
Nice and straightforward, Oma!
@andrewlee8667
4 жыл бұрын
love the tests... really pragmatic... appreciated.
@JackMajor
4 жыл бұрын
Great test! Just the video I needed
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Jack Major you might be interested in watching this one as well: Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 vs Zeiss ! kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno
@stevelink21
4 жыл бұрын
Excellent comparison, guys! I have a question...As a landscape and product STILLS X-T3 shooter (no video), I have been debating on selling my Fuji kit (reluctantly), and moving into FF, specifically the Sony a7Rlll and lenses like the Sony 16-35 f/4, and the 90mm f/2.8 G Macro . Since I shoot 99% tripod-mounted, neither IBIS nor video interests me. So, my question is, for large print output (around 24"x 36" prints), how much of an improvement in terms of image sharpness, detail rendition, dynamic range, base ISO performance, etc., would I see over the already excellent X-T3 (combined with the ultra-sharp Fujinon XF80mm f/2.8 Macro lens), when using the a7Rlll and the Sony 90mm f/2.8 G Macro or Sony 16-35 f/4 tripod-mounted? Thanks!
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Hi steve. I didn't use the X-T3. I know it's a great camera. Elia Locardi uses Fuji camera for most of his Landscape and cityscape projects. Art doesn't need expensive camera. I made most of my landscape portfolio with Canon 6D. www.omarghomrawi.com/photography So if you're doing that type of work you're satisfied with Fuji, I believe stick with what you have and save some money.
@stevelink21
4 жыл бұрын
@@OmaGhomrawi Hi Oma. Thank you for your sound advice! And yes, if I wasn't an insatiable "pixel peeper" obsessed with image sharpness and detail, I certainly like your suggestion. However, I''ve been on the Fuji X-System for about 8 years now, and think I've reached the limit if print detail with my good exposure/post processing techniques. Hence, my desire to move to FF...either with the Sony a7Rlll or the Nikon Z7. I did hear some folks say that Sony bodies have a "sensor dust" issue. Have you found this? Thanks again!
@sze728
5 жыл бұрын
Good info! Can you compare the GM 16-35mm vs Batis 18mm
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, I have no access to Batis 18mm at this time. Thank you for passing by Stephan
@knoxxville499
5 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! Very helpful. Think I'll be getting the f4 Z!
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Oo, Thank you for watching Denzel. Think about Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 Just launched yesterday and open for pre-order at $899
@mattoc4930
4 жыл бұрын
Oma Ghomrawi the tamron is not image stabilised though. A big deal breaker for me as i do primary video. I think i wanna get the sony f4
@memoriesbysatyam5320
4 жыл бұрын
Nice. Try to compare Tamron 17-28 f2.8 and 16-35 f4
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for Watching mate, here is your video kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno
@HigherTech
4 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! May I ask, what lens is used for the top down shots? Well done!
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
I has been long time ago, I believe that was the 16-50mm kit lens for Crop sensor
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
You might be interested in watching this one kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 vs Zeiss 16-35mm f4 DEEP REVIEW
@danielhopen6511
5 жыл бұрын
What a great review guys! This helped a lot :)
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Daniel Hopen thabk you for watching Daniel, we glad that offered ypu new information. Best!
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
I'm currently running a giveaway on the channel. Feel free to join.. kzitem.info/news/bejne/rnxj1oKhhaNkg44
@elbanaag9355
4 жыл бұрын
true that you can have both 16-35 zeiss and samyang/rokinon 35 1.4. but how about astro? 16-35 2.8 can get nice astro and lowlight video. and what about when you do travel a lot and can't afford to change lens? sometimes the client would only give you like few minutes to shoot before you go to the next area.. the GM gives you that much of versatility having to bring only 1 lens and can do it all. prime lenses are best if you have all the time to prepare and get the best shot. each lenses serves it's purpose. if you have all the time to prepare, and doesn't shoot that much in lowlight then 16-35 zeiss would be enough.
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
I prefer to pick up Tamron over Zeiss and G master, check this video kzitem.info/news/bejne/l3er2I53gnyIqJw
@elbanaag9355
4 жыл бұрын
Oma Ghomrawi good for you. i didn't like 17-28 when i tested it. main issue is it can't be your 1 lens for travel. you will want to swap lenses due to 28mm is not a good focal length vs 35. and 16mm vs 17mm is noticeable when on tight spaces. after renting and trying it, i've decided not taking it. if only tamron made identical focal length, it would be great similar to the case of 28-75 vs 24-70. i have the tamron 28-75 by the way :)
@TamerBekir
3 жыл бұрын
This is the best damn review. Thank you!
@OmaGhomrawi
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! You might be interested in watching this one as well.. Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 vs Zeiss 16-35mm f4 kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno
@reanult457
4 жыл бұрын
is it not a bit fair when the GM lens uses f 2.8 instead of f4 when comparing the images ? thx you for your nice video
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Check this one may fill the gap you're looking for Tamron 17-28 f2.8 vs 16-35 G Master vs Sony Zeiss f4 | Ultimate REVIEW kzitem.info/news/bejne/l3er2I53gnyIqJw
@giankcruz
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the info guys
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your appreciation, Giancarlo. It really means to us.
@MrPeralgio
5 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video congratulations!
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for passing by Peralgio.
@carbon6372
4 жыл бұрын
Do you think the Sony Zeiss 16-35mm will be as sharp as the GM on a Sony a7R IV? I will mostly shoot f/8 - f/11, so I don’t need the wide aperture, but I’m afraid that it doesn’t resolve as much of the sensor. It would be nice to save some money, so I can use the rest on a prime.
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
I never tested both lenses on a7r iv You might be interested in watching this video as well kzitem.info/news/bejne/l3er2I53gnyIqJw Tamron 17-28 f2.8 vs 16-35 G Master vs Sony Zeiss f4 | Ultimate REVIEW
@carbon6372
4 жыл бұрын
Oma Ghomrawi Thanks. Yeah, I understand. The Sigma 14-24mm is probably the best for my use for architecture. But sometimes I also do landscapes and might need filters. I haven’t really used filters before, but it’s nice to avoid glare, reflections or getting a longer exposure. Maybe the GM is it. You can probably tell a significant difference on the Sony a7R IV compared to the Sony a7 III.
@martinusjr7654
5 жыл бұрын
great video guys thank you so much
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Jữnįör 888 all the best bro, thank you for watching Are you interested to check Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 vs Zeiss 16-35 f4 ?
@martinusjr7654
5 жыл бұрын
@@OmaGhomrawi thank you have a great weekend
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
I'm currently running a giveaway on the channel. Feel free to join.. kzitem.info/news/bejne/rnxj1oKhhaNkg44
@moSahl
5 жыл бұрын
Good review! Thanks.
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Muhammad Sahl thank you for watching Muhammad 👍🏻
@moSahl
5 жыл бұрын
@@OmaGhomrawi Thank you for the review brother.
@tatusiamiuller3666
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you! It was useful!
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching Tatusia. Are you willing to buy a wide angle lens?
@tatusiamiuller3666
5 жыл бұрын
@@OmaGhomrawi yes!
@OmaGhomrawi
5 жыл бұрын
Tatusia Miuller check out Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 just launched this month
@msnow9847
4 жыл бұрын
I love your name😂😂 In german „Oma“ means Granny.
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
Eventually I've been told that a while ago. My next door neighbor is german. Oma is my nick name
@gromitart
2 жыл бұрын
Go testing, Do a good job.
@suhasm8779
4 жыл бұрын
I am using Zeiss lens for my a73 ... The video quality is very dull and unsharpen .. please help me
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
are you shooting at 16 or 35mm ? in 1080 or 4k ?
@suhasm8779
4 жыл бұрын
@@OmaGhomrawi its 16 - 35 lens and i shoot in 1080 because i need 50fps ...please suggest me what can i do...
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
@@suhasm8779 Zeiss has soft image quality at 35mm, while 16mm is pretty sharp. Try to clean the lens, check your focus, use proper shutter speed: 1/100 when shooting 50fps.
@yuezhao276
3 жыл бұрын
F2.8 nice
@OmaGhomrawi
3 жыл бұрын
You might be interested in watching this one as well: Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 vs Zeiss 16-35mm f4 DEEP REVIEW kzitem.info/news/bejne/qqhrnZWqbF-ehno
@specialized41
4 жыл бұрын
For me Zeiss f4 . .
@shirsenduhalder9458
4 жыл бұрын
Which combination is best for staring landscape photography Canon EOS R + EF16-35 F4L Or Sony A73 + Zies 16-35 F4. My first choices is canon but i am confused because there is no IBIS
@OmaGhomrawi
4 жыл бұрын
If you like or already canon lenses go for Canon R6 it has ibis. Personally I like Sony cameras more than Canon. They are more powerful
@shirsenduhalder9458
4 жыл бұрын
@@OmaGhomrawi Is it true sony had complicated menu system
Пікірлер: 106