Brilliant ! Thank you very very much. 🙏🏼🙏🏼 The Harry Potter reference was just too much 🤣🤣 You just floored the youngsters and now I’m sure they are ur die hard fans.
@connectthedotswithanu6378
4 жыл бұрын
Mind blowing explanation with deep insights which ordinary mind cannot draw.... you are great dushyant.... god bless you
@ashvathneelakandan6302
5 жыл бұрын
Great explanation to the topic Why did Lord Rama sent his pregnant wife Seetha in exile? The people who are devoted to Shri Rama and Sita must watch this video to understand the depth and nuances of The Ramayana. Many pranams to you 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 Jai Shri Ram.
@hibye2270
5 жыл бұрын
yes
@dasikakn
4 жыл бұрын
I think the “administrative pressures” is a broad brush. As a king/leader, succession plan is very important. If there is a question over virtuosity of Sita, wouldn’t there also be a question of her child being a legitimate heir. Rama being of pure mind, he probably didn’t think about it until the cheap minds brought it up. But once it was brought up it must have entered into his consideration about the stability of the kingdom if people believed his heir was not legitimate. The issue is that by leaving Sita in the forest, not only did he forsake her, he also gave up his child. He could have waited for her baby to come. But he didn’t and I don’t recollect reading anywhere that he expected his child (turned out to be twins) to come back and claim the throne. Thats why I think “succession planning” must have been a big part of the decision also. He also did not remarry. Which means he would have expected to give the throne after him to the next brother or his child. Now the problem is - why did he accept the kids as the crown princes ? My guess is because they defeated Rama’s army after capturing his hirse during Ashwamedha yagya. Once Sita intervenes and he recognized they are children of Sita, it would have been a tragic fight to death. So, he cedes his kingdom to them. They earn it fair and square, dharmically.
@rowdirangan959
5 жыл бұрын
சுவாமி ஐயா, இப்படி பட்ட உபன்யாசங்களை மறந்து போன சனாதன உலக்குக்கு தந்து நீங்கள் உங்கள் பிறவி பயனை அடைந்து விட்டீர்கள்..
@chandini.p.s
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture .I get certain points of whichI never even paid attention to ponder over.
@sridharanramakrishnan5952
4 жыл бұрын
I was heart broken by the instance of mother Sita taken to forest and is the reason for not seeing uttara Ramayanam being aired by DD . The angle of thought expressed here was unique. But your description of Sita mata as the strongest women and her forgiving Rama for the act was something out of the blue. And the many names by which mata Sita was known doesn’t connect with Rama even in one. Your words that Sita was a very strong women and can absolutely defend herself brought so much solace. I don’t know I felt very light after listening to u. Thank u. May you live a thousand years . I just poured my heart out. If I am silly I may be forgiven by Sita and Rama.
@subhasundar3438
4 жыл бұрын
Wow what a urbanism What a English it's fabulous I like it it was eye catching It's amazing. 😇😇👑👑👑 You are he king or lord of urbanisation
@gaiharinath4810
3 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation, so interesting, wish it continued till the end🙏
I wish i had such command over sanskrit. i could have read the ramayan in original sanskrit
@vikramsrinivasan8176
5 жыл бұрын
Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha Srimathe SriVarAha MahAdEsikAya Namaha Fantastic pronunciation Dushyanth Swamy. PAnin grinishva panina. From you adiyen learned RAmAnujasya charanow Sharanam Prapadye. Earlier was telling sharanow Sharanam Prapadye. Aha pandureethi kolo goosebumps Da chancey illa semma 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 Naham jAnAmi keyurey my appa used to say God bless you Dushyanth Sridhar NArAyanA NArAyanA
@vikramsrinivasan8176
5 жыл бұрын
Bhasma bhasmarha tejasa mind blowing PirAtti perumai Dushyanth swamy can I hug you? Long live Dushyanth Swamy
@bhagyalakshmijayaraman5867
5 жыл бұрын
Awesome!! Plz post the remaining part of the discourse!!
@lathasuresh1342
4 жыл бұрын
Pls post the remaining part of discourse.. Waiting to hear. 🙏🙏
@lakshmieswaran4356
4 жыл бұрын
Very nice explanation
@adharshr3897
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent.
@kannanannamalai7356
3 жыл бұрын
Jai sri Ram
@shubhaprada6184
4 жыл бұрын
To my amazement I have come across this video at such a juncture when exactly this same understanding has already started seeping into me. I have even gone into pondering as to what other things Rama could have done ...one of the options is instead of abandoning her outright he could maintained her with dignity in the woods.
@sudarsanparthasarathy4122
5 жыл бұрын
I was under the impression , age of Sri Rama and Sri Seetha Devi was 16 and 12, as i recollect Kambar referring irrettu, irraaru which is 2x8 and 2x6. Dushyant swami please clarify
@ganesavenkkats489
5 жыл бұрын
சரணாகதம் Pranam
@uwhen100
5 жыл бұрын
Love Dushyant Sridhar's talks & upanyasa's. Where can I watch t(h)is full discourse?
@krishnapreetha187
5 жыл бұрын
Murugan Rajaa you can check out in utube...."lecture on WHYs of ramayanam"
@deepanarain1703
5 жыл бұрын
'English lecture on the Why's of Ramayana' by SriDushyanth Sridhar. You can check (search)with this title for the full speech @Murugan Rajaa
@raji101984
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent swami
@varadarajnarayanan5120
5 жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏🙏
@hemanpanwar9877
5 жыл бұрын
Next part?
@sudarsanparthasarathy4122
5 жыл бұрын
I was under the impression , age of Sri Rama and Sri Seetha Devi at marriage was 16 and 12, as i recollect Kambar referring irrettu aandu agavaiyan, irraaru aandu agavaiyal which is 2x8 and 2x6. Dushyant swami please clarify
@AJ-fo3hp
3 жыл бұрын
Sita is also part of society, I don't know logic behind.THERE is no point in convincing or defending arguments with respect to injustice (listen word at 22:36) , we shouldn't give fantacy argument for convincing injustice. We are accepting whole RAMAYAN IS based out of TRUE facts thats all. One thing TRUE facts were written, everybody accepted because of TRUE facts,if these TRUE facts were not written that means not documented then we wouldn't have discussed, so we have to leave it as it is, we shouldn't give fantacy argument for convincing, it is even more dangerous than bitter truth, TRUTH does not need logic. This gives information that write a correct, true information rather giving false information. In Ayodhya RAMA born it is truth There (was) is ( will) RAMA TEMPLE is another TRUTH. RAMA traveled breadth and width of India This is also TRUE. RAMA built bridge across SEA this is also TRUE. RAMA fought against evil forces this is also TRUE. There was PUSHPAKA viman this is also TRUE. RAMA came to Ayodhya by PUSHPAKA viman this is also TRUE. RAMA pattabhisheka done after arrival this is also TRUE. fate of Ayodhya people unfortunate thing happened RAMA sent Sita to forest this is also TRUE(hard to hear, difficult to write but it is TRUTH need to be documented) Kush and Lava are sons of RAMA this is also TRUE. RAMA came to know that Kush and Lava are sons. Again unfortunate thing happened Sita leave everything behind and follows Mother Earth this is also TRUE. Conclusion: This cannot be call it as story with fantasy, RAMAYANA IS TRUE whatever happened in RAMA life is documented AS IT IS, nothing hidden even after thousands of year this is unchanged. Some place it is bitter, in some place is it sweet.We know that, whatever we studied in colleges written by people on past thing we call it HIS-STORY (HISTORY) there is a lot of questions why because it is STORY not TRUE document, currently we studying history in terms lies not TRUE document, if TRUE thing is presented, this society is afraid to accept it doesn't have openness to accept TRUTH. As we know that there was a TEMPLE this a TRUE but how difficult to convince. Think in terms of TRUE facts, adding 1 to 1 it becomes double it can't be zero, this is true. TRUE can't be hidden. We shouldn't give logic on TRUE.
@dasikakn
4 жыл бұрын
I think the “administrative pressures” is a broad brush. As a king/leader, succession plan is very important. If there is a question over virtuosity of Sita, wouldn’t there also be a question of her child being a legitimate heir. Rama being of pure mind, he probably didn’t think about it until the cheap minds brought it up. But once it was brought up it had to have entered into his consideration. The issue is that by leaving Sita in the forest, not only did he forsake her, he also gave up his child. I don’t recollect reading anywhere that he expected his child (turned out to be twins) to come back and claim the throne.
@AJ-fo3hp
3 жыл бұрын
22:36 It was injustice. If it was injustice, then it is injustice. RAMAYANA is based on true fact.Sri Maharushi Sri Valmiki written it based on true fact.Because of true fact we shouldn't elaborate or garland of words to cover the injustice. let accept it was injustice, because RAMAYANA is true facts.
@silentstorm7507
4 жыл бұрын
Well if the people loved rama...rama could have given a sermon to his people regarding 'why talking ill about a woman like sita is wrong'... people would have listened to him and the problem would have been settled...no need to harm sita..
@animax1034
3 жыл бұрын
Rama dont want to brainwash his people without proofs, let them know the truth by themself by experience that only happened in future as his children won the kingdom dharmically and proved they are his sons that day everything was crystal clear to everyone and about harming sita?, like this guy said in this video sita is very strong she can handle her own problems she didnt asked any help from rama and rama knew sita is daughter of mother earth she is not normal human she was even fine at ravans territory thats why rama was least worried about her and was busy in his duty, sita knew this and left, rama didnt stopped her as he was busy in his duty (administravite pressure) nation comes first situation and because it was her wish to go in forest and raise her kid in natural environment this was accepted by rama she didnt need any permission to leave or not she just left and later she forgived him that is what matters she even said laxman to leave her alone, it is not like rama forced her to leave ok i dont know if u understood the deepness of the situation to explain form me in english is not that easy
@vasi9262
Жыл бұрын
People will find justification for every action of Rama! They either deny that it was from original Ramayana or justify "see how kind Rama was he left her not far from an ashram..etc" and they still call Rama as a Perfect Man in every aspect(after killing Bali, after killing a shudra, mistreating pregnant Sita(she was a strong woman so why not to leave her in a forest, she can survive, she is strong) ..this is NOT a Perfect Man!!!! Unfortunately, religions blindfold ppl, brainwashed them thinking within a religious frame and if you question u ll be labeled "you don't understand, u r not ready yet"..
@piyushchoudhary1316
4 жыл бұрын
but this is from uttar kaand and uttar kaand is not in Valmiki ramayan
@poodamakku
4 жыл бұрын
Swamin is the logic same for Agnipravesham? If not why Rama ordered for Agnipravesham
@padhmasinirenganathan
4 жыл бұрын
Please search for Why's of ramayanam by him . Swamy has explained that also.... it's actually continuation of the same upanyasam
@navneethsundaresan6970
3 жыл бұрын
I have heard the reason for Sita Mata's Agnipravesham. The reason is that when Mareecha dies at the hands of Rama, he imitates Rama and shouts in the forest and dies. Then Sita became worried for a moment and said Lakshmana to go in search of Rama. First Lakshmana relented to go saying that nothing would have happened to Rama as he is undefeatable in a battle. Then Sita Mata says some cruel words to Lakshmana which becomes the reason for her Agnipravesham. She falsely accuses Lakshmana that he wanted to have a relation with Sita when Rama was not there. This accusation brings tears to Lakshmana Swamy as he was ever devoted to both of them and treated them like his own father and mother. Then Lakshmana says that may the forest deities protect you and goes in search of Rama. This incident was there in Rama's mind for a long time and therefore when Sita Mata comes after the victory of Rama over Ravana, Rama remeembering this incident puts the same false accusation on Sita and makes her beg in front of Lakshmana Swamy who was falsely accused by Sita Mata.
@indianyogimalaysia
5 жыл бұрын
thats why you shouldnt equate Rama with Krishna.Rama was not an incarnation of God like Krishna.Krishna was God ,Rama was only a human like Arjuna.
@vvadhana9937
5 жыл бұрын
hello, hello.. don't compare ramar and arjuna. Ramar is sometimes greater than Krishnar. Ramar gave moksham to Jatayu. Which human being had given moksham. Humans show off. But ramar was always humble and he never showed off Himself anytime. Never compare Ramar to ordinary human being!
@vvadhana9937
5 жыл бұрын
"Rama was only a human" - There is no dearth to the criticisms of human beings getting caught with mundane things. Now one says low of ramar but at a different point of time, one would say krishnar is a womanizer. No dearth to narrowmindedness of us. If we go into the personal lives of every husband and wife, one would see nothing is so ideal and we are criticizing Ramar-sita daambadhyam. It's theirs and they have the choice to live what they like similar to how you expect others not to poke in ur marital life.
@nilalohita5020
5 жыл бұрын
Rama is God as well.
@the_unfiltered_truth7181
4 жыл бұрын
Biggest mistake in the understanding there. Rama is the supreme God himself. Rama pretended all his life. Specific verses exist where Shiva warns the Devas of the same mistake. Shiva himself worshipped Rama, so Rama is definitely not human. On the other hand, yes... Parashurama is just a human.
@animax1034
3 жыл бұрын
rama and krishna are same personality born in different timelines, there is no comparison or difference in same thing
Пікірлер: 46