I enjoyed that line than all the story 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Kwcreativemedia
15 күн бұрын
That hella sent me 😂
@udopiarecords
14 күн бұрын
Terrence thinking like "oh shit he's right" then says "or am i right!?!" lmfao
@mrjuanderfuI
14 күн бұрын
Host was lookin for an out so bad lol
@angrymarshmallowMK8DX
4 ай бұрын
Math was so good he created a sequel
@frankyreynhold
Ай бұрын
The function is "f(x) = x(x)" if x=1 then "f(1) = 1(1)". Multiplication is a contraction of a factor. If I scale something from 1 along a ratio of 1:1, then you get 1 because you did not change it at all. If I have 1 apple per set (1/1) and I have 1 set of apples, then I have 1 apple. You are not comparing 2 things. You are scaling 1 thing by a factor of the second value. If I have 2 sets where the set is 1 apple per set, then I have 2(1/1) = 2/2=1.
@luvuyomelese7158
Ай бұрын
In simple terms: Multiplication = Reaction Don't confuse it with addition. That is why we have both addition & multiplication in math😎
@ronanm4418
Ай бұрын
Thanks you! Louder for the people in the back!
@jackinzbox.
29 күн бұрын
The irony that the only people who would actually understand what you wrote or want to spend the time to understand it already know that 1x1=2.
@heyalun
14 күн бұрын
@@jackinzbox.wait what? If you have 1 group of 1 apples you have 2 apples?
@jackinzbox.
14 күн бұрын
@@heyalun just realized I made that typo lmao. I meant 1x1=1 but I guess my brain was so focused on 1x1=2 that that’s what I wrote. Not gonna fix it tho since it’s pretty funny.
@danbrown3103
4 ай бұрын
Love Terrance’s math clips. Reading the comments really does show how stupid a lot of people are.
@xaviermagnate
3 ай бұрын
At first I thought you were serious. Terrence does need a psychiatric intervention.
@danbrown3103
3 ай бұрын
@@xaviermagnate Yes he does. I meant that some comments agree with him.
@kacmed
3 ай бұрын
@@danbrown3103 terrence is pretending ... he doesnt know ... in real world math works ok, but if you go to quantum world 1 * 1 = 11 ... because string can vibrate in 11 different dimensions ... 1 action 1 string 11 different outcomes ... math even support this ... BUT the way he is explaining is obvious that he read something, doesnt graps the idea and now he is trying to replicate it ... butchering it completely
@kacmed
3 ай бұрын
@@danbrown3103 just to be clear 1 * 1 = 11 that i explained is oversimplified to the maximum level because math behind this is complex as hell
@chronicillz1879
2 ай бұрын
@@kacmed what
@pokpok833
4 ай бұрын
“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.” This quote is being proven to be true as we speak
@TheGiantMidget
Ай бұрын
This is reminding me of 2+2 =5 in george orwell's 1984
@fireburnseverything
23 күн бұрын
For those of you who don't know, mathematicians settled this in the 1800s. Long story short, the real numbers (i.e , all the numbers we commonly use) are something called a field. A field is a mathematical object that is the basis for a lot of the math we use (e.g. addition, multiplication, division, calculus, etc.) Every field must have something called an "identity element" for multiplication. The identity element for multiplication (call the identity element i) is a number such that i × x = x for any number x For the real numbers, we define 1 as the identity element for the real numbers. So if we let x =1, we see that 1×1 =1 So Terrence is wrong. He is wrong because BY DEFINITION 1 x 1 = 1. Kudos if you read this. 😁
@abdoulkadermoussasiddo1946
15 күн бұрын
Is an identity means 1? I don’t think so. And what if our identity element is 2 or anything else? In such case the above demonstration will collapse. For my part we should pay attention to what Terrence is raising.
@fireburnseverything
15 күн бұрын
@abdoulkadermoussasiddo1946 There is a little bit more to the explanation I gave. The real numbers are a specific kind a field called an ordered field. Essentially, this means that all the numbers have a specifix order (i.e. -2 < 3 , pi < 4, etc). By definition, 1 is the multiplicative identity for the real numbers and 2 defined as 1+1. We can define other numbers in other ways as well. For example 3 is just 2 +1 where 2 is defined from before. 4 is just 3+1, etc. One thing you might notice is that we are kind of "building" the set of real numbers. We started with the idea of a field with a mulitplicative identity and then we defined the numbers 2, 3, 4, and so on. Without adding too much complexity, every field must have two operations with two identities for those operations. For the real numbers, the two operators are multiplication and addition. 1 is defined as the multiplicative identity (i.e. 1×x = x for any number x). 0 is defined as the additive identity (I.e. x+0 = x for any number x) There is more to this. All members of a field (other than the additive inverse) must have a multiplictive inverse. Furthermore, every memver ofna field must have an additive inverse. This gives us negative numbers and fractions. Something called the axiom of completeness gives us all the other numbers. I know this is a lot, but the point is that all of these ideas are formalized.
@MrOod67
13 күн бұрын
How is the multiplication of 1 with 0 explained using this field theory?
@fireburnseverything
10 күн бұрын
@MrOod67 We define multiplication as: a×b = a added to itself b times. For example, 2×3 = 2+2+2 =6 In the case of 0×1, you have 0 added 1 time (i.e. just zero). So it is just zero.
@MrOod67
9 күн бұрын
@@fireburnseverything I was actually asking specifically regarding the field theory you mentioned and the identity element, but having re-read your original post I see now I misread the equation: I read it as i * x = i, which obviously isn't correct in most cases.
@jonniemae818
8 сағат бұрын
I am looking into this cats drag. I know he is onto something we need to get/know. Thanks for bringing Mr. Terrance Howard and thank you Mr. Howard❤ all the best. Really, thank you for standing up and saying it.
@DRocker80
5 ай бұрын
Bad math. That's why Hustle and Flow made $23.5 million, but he only got paid $12,000.
@ailuosi7241
5 ай бұрын
yeah thats not the reason
@DRocker80
5 ай бұрын
@@ailuosi7241 Lol. I know....but still.
@jogaytillman3070
4 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@chronicillz1879
2 ай бұрын
he only got paid 12k for that movie??? woooooooow, no way i dont believe that, he KILLED in that role
@afaha2214
2 ай бұрын
yooooo this is THE TOP COMMENT
@He_certified
4 ай бұрын
This whole world was lied too.
@destrocks
19 күн бұрын
It doesn’t make sense but it does. Here is what I understand when he says 1x0=1 and 1x1=2: If I take my cat and multiply her by 0 then I still only have 1 cat If I take my 1 cat and multiply her 1 time, now I’ve got 2 identical cats.
@nateseven7172
17 күн бұрын
Yet folks can’t wrap their minds around this simple thing lol
@otometal
15 күн бұрын
But 1x0 is 1 group of 0 or 0 groups of 1. Your cat being multiplied by 0 would mean there is a 0 groups of cats. Or the cat=0 and theres no cats at all. 1x1 cat is 1 group of 1 cat which = 1. Whichever way, the numbers represent VALUES. Why are people arguing about elementary level math??
@realrandywilliams
14 күн бұрын
@otometal is right. Multiplying is the same as adding groups, not some type of extended addition. I understand what he's saying but we must remember, actors get paid to lie to us. It's literally their job to lie. 1x0 is the same as saying 1 group of 0, which means the total is 0..and 1x1 is the same as 1 group of 1, meaning the total, which comes from addition, is 1.. 5x10 is 5 groups of 10 ones, which when added equals 50.. it works, no need to reinvent the wheel
@MrOod67
13 күн бұрын
They told us math is racist, next they will tell us its subjective, then its individual to everyone, and finally each number isn't unary but rather can identify as a wide spectrum of numbers, perhaps it even follows a probability curve centered on its assignment at discovery.
@realrandywilliams
13 күн бұрын
@MrOod67 lol I think your right about the first part, but every number is unary, including integers and floating points. Each number, interger or decimal represents a fixed point. Any alteration of that number represents a completely different value regardless of how close their values are. 1.0001 is a different value than 1.0002. Think about radio frequencies. Those two frequencies on a remote control would most likely not control the same TV.
@bunny_girl.905
20 сағат бұрын
I asked my teacher about this when I was in school. She had no explanation and said we have to follow the math book
@cryptonomad.8656
Күн бұрын
"Its like when I'm right I'm right, when I'm wrong I could been right, so I'm still right cause I coulda been wrong, you know, and I'm sorry cause I could be wrong right now, I could be wrong, but if I'm right..." This makes more since in this moment than the movie when he said it. That's true art if he was expressing this energy during that scene.
@wuneyeproduction
5 ай бұрын
Education is important guys 😂😂😂
@justinkurtrivera2315
14 күн бұрын
Yes not every education tells the truth some of it are lies
@deflategate1297
5 күн бұрын
I think realizing nothing is true always is more important
@deflategate1297
5 күн бұрын
@@justinkurtrivera2315yeah like cults
@staydiligent7325
2 күн бұрын
@wuneyeproduction education is definitely important I never knew Christopher Columbus discovered America 🤭🤥
@NewDay101
8 күн бұрын
This is the time of awakening! Some people will never wake up and others will find their true purpose! A dummy laughs and ridicules something he doesn’t understand a wise person benefits from helping others!
@bryant362
2 күн бұрын
When you multiply any number by 1, the result is always that number itself. So, when you multiply 1 by 1, you're essentially saying "take one of something and keep it as it is," which equals 1. Multiplying by 2 means you're adding another set of the same quantity, which is different from just keeping one set, hence the result is 2.
@portiadefleur7818
Ай бұрын
Ok, if I go up to someone and ask "can I kick you just this one time." Would they get kicked once or twice? That one ask times that one action would equal one kick. Yes or no?
@ronanm4418
Ай бұрын
Excellent example
@daniellepugsley3130
27 күн бұрын
I am in no means saying I agree with Terrence, but if I kick something I would have exerted a force that I generated. Now if I were to kick you, I would also feel pain because a force is being exerted back onto me from your leg. At a molecular level I would think there were 2 “kicks” in your example.
@ronanm4418
27 күн бұрын
@@daniellepugsley3130 this is a fundamental misunderstanding of this guy's example, and of multiplication. You are overcomplicating this
@BlackHatGhostAnon5670
17 күн бұрын
1 times the 1 time he's already been kicked in the nuts or 1 times 0 ?
@lukeatbrandynightful
14 күн бұрын
@@daniellepugsley3130okay so if McDonald’s sell a cheeseburger for $1 and you buy 1 cheeseburger and they charge you $2, are you just gonna sit back and accept that?
@nouha1154
5 күн бұрын
1x1=2 Using Tangential Flight Theory: In the context of tangential flight theory, the multiplication operation might represent a transformation or combination of vectors representing different physical quantities. For example, multiplying a velocity vector by a time vector could yield a displacement vector, which, when added to the initial position, results in a final position that is twice the distance from the starting point. So, in this specific interpretation, 1 multiplied by 1 could indeed result in 2, representing a doubling of distance along a tangential path.
@ease3715
4 күн бұрын
Or 1x-1=1 making x 2
@ryanstroppel4966
Күн бұрын
By stating it might represent a transformation or combination of vectors, then the mathematical representation of wrong.
@spencer4324
6 ай бұрын
My calculator and 3rd grade teacher Mr Sumnter says it's 1. 1 times anything is equal to itself...his math anit mathin'...and they hosts trying to be polite
@samtaulli8504
6 ай бұрын
It’s insane how the dude in the video is so fucking stupid but yet so confident in himself I find it amazing cause I’m relatively intelligent but struggle with my confidence even when I know I’m correct. There should be a science deduction to the study of people below average intelligence we need to know why some people just can’t understand basic concepts and how they become that way
@ailuosi7241
5 ай бұрын
you clearly dont understand his point and thats not entirely your fault because very smart people have a problem explaining themselves clearly. essentially he is talking about a mathematical fallacy that presents itself in quantum physics where the idea or concept of 1x1=1 or 1x0=0 breaks down and becomes false. similarly how Newtons law breaks down and becomes false the closer you approach a black hole. it doesn't mean that Newtons law is wrong but it cannot be applied to a black hole. you need to replace it with Einsteins theory in order to solve it. the same can be said for 1x1. as you aproach things at the quantum level, the equation breaks down and is no longer true and therefore must be replaced with something else. thats his point. 1x1 still is 1 when dealing with basic math but the further away from basic math you get, you come to find that it doesn't work. he has successfully brought this up to be audited and they are still discussing this at Oxford as i type this. this is an actual problem in quantum physics. so while we like to joke and be funny calling people stupid and crazy only to find out they were right makes us look foolish.
@spencer4324
5 ай бұрын
@@ailuosi7241 I got time today... Condescension may suit you, at the same time I never called him stupid or crazy. Highly intelligent people have a challenge articulating in social constructs not their knowledge. You know it, you can explain it. If he was trying to flex, it failed. Using the claim that 1x1=2 can be proven by entering it in a cell phone calculator is flawed. That math wasn't mathing. I do agree that if he wanted to explain the quantum math approach in a more palatable way a simple "1x1 as we know it works in basic math, however, it becomes false when applied using math in quantum physics" which would have created a mind blown teachable moment 🤯 not a wtf is he on my teacher and calculator is saying this moment🤔🙄.
@ailuosi7241
5 ай бұрын
@@spencer4324 the 1x1=2 comment he made was a reference to something he had said prior to the conversation he is having in the clip. go watch the whole thing. they didn't put in the equation 1x1. he brought that up to make a point about how he knows they heard him say it before and thought he was crazy for saying it. so he was proving a mathematical fallacy by showing a loop through the square root of 2 where he proved that x^3=x+x=2x which is a loop that shouldn't occur. they were laughing and joking until they did it themselves and found out he was correct and then they stopped laughing. this formula in mathematics is completely wrong and yet he just showed them that it actually works yet it shouldn't. again, you failed to understand his point and mine at the same time and i never said you called him stupid and crazy. he literally says it in tbe video that thats what people were saying about him. and if you truly have the time then actually watch the full clip and you will see that they never typed 1x1 into the calculator to get 2. again you just don't get it.
@spencer4324
5 ай бұрын
@@ailuosi7241 Either you failed to understand or I'm not clear is that I'm commenting on the short that was shown. I'm not disputing his or your claims that beyond the basic math the equation is a fallacy. I said so. There is no link to the longer version of video nor will I search for it, for that I don't have the time. The creators of the video obviously didn't want to highlight the mind blowing moment or they would have narrated the story differently with added link to proof of the claim. Given the short the math isn't mathing based on the information edited and provided. My calculator and teacher still reflects my aforementioned claims. You're still debating the equation and missing the forest for the trees... I suppose it's that social construct I was talking about earlier.🤷🏾♀️ It's okay to agree to disagree.
@literbikemike2670
6 ай бұрын
What, did he actually say 1x1=2? I wouldn’t say crazy, maybe confused, but not crazy.
@dannyave4dapeople
6 ай бұрын
He’s saying the calculator comes up as 2 for the answer.
@TheGr8one1022
6 ай бұрын
@@dannyave4dapeopleno you should probably look it up. He's actually legitimately crazy. Look up a speech he gave at Oxford years ago, he's literally out of his mind and thinks he knows secret mathematics.
@Filthyheartz
6 ай бұрын
@@dannyave4dapeopleno he saying 1x1 is 2 lol bec it’s multiples which would be more not the same number but we have be programmed to believe the answer is 1. If yu get enough people to believe in a lie it becomes true.
@literbikemike2670
6 ай бұрын
I think he’s gaslighting. The calculator answer is also one. X is just how many times the other number is repeated. 1x1 is the same as saying one once. Now if you start talking about quantum mathematics and two numbers holding the same position, that’s something else entirely.
@ailuosi7241
5 ай бұрын
you people clearly dont understand
@bktrybe3685
5 күн бұрын
Eddie Griffin spoke on this and I highly agree with him when he said 1+1 doesn't equal 2 it equals 3 or 4...
@louveniaadams9440
3 күн бұрын
💯
@pc8679
18 сағат бұрын
How does 1+1 equal 3 or 4?
@dBakaj
4 ай бұрын
He is definitely wrong. Sqrt(2)^3 = Sqrt(2)*2 Expand the left: Sqrt(2)*Sqrt(2)*Sqrt(2) = Sqrt(2)*2 Factor out the right: Sqrt(2)*Sqrt(2)*Sqrt(2) = Sqrt(2)*Sqrt(2)*Sqrt(2) The equation balances out. Dude just failed algebra. He can confuse himself and others who aren’t good at math, but he ain’t gonna confuse me because I’m Asian.
@Pogohontas.
4 ай бұрын
Lmao I typed all this before doing the calculation and thinking about it: ----------- Hold on, when you factored out the right, you turned "Sqrt(2)*2" into "Sqrt(2)*Sqrt(2)*Sqrt(2)", which is Sqrt(2)^3 Sqrt(2)*2 is not the same as Sqrt(2)^3. --------- I feel silly now and I see you weren't joking haha. Although this wouldn't work with any other number as far as I know
@dBakaj
4 ай бұрын
@@Pogohontas. lol, yes, when an equation is presented, the equation doesn’t mean it must balance out for all values of x. You have to solve for x. Here’s another example: x^2 = 5*x I make a false claim: your calculator is broken because it thinks the square of a number is just 5 times that number. Here, I want you to start with the number 5…. That’s because this equation is only true for x=5, the equation does not have to be true for all values of x. The idea is simple, but I can see how it can be confusing for someone who isn’t that great at math.
@remmie99
29 күн бұрын
isnt this math and not squirting?
@nikokaapa
5 ай бұрын
This man has lost his marbles
@antpain1156
5 ай бұрын
has he?
@nikokaapa
5 ай бұрын
@@antpain1156 has he?
@Topple362
4 ай бұрын
@@nikokaapayou know really has he tho? Every body is claiming what he says is false but he literally created solar inventions to sustain energy from the sun designed models and everything I’m going to be 100 percent honest I think he is Nikolai Tesla incarnate I really do people is calling him crazy but what he’s saying is plausible
@nikokaapa
4 ай бұрын
@@Topple362 The man thinks he has created a new number. The man has definitely lost at least a big portion of his precious marbles.
@Topple362
4 ай бұрын
@@nikokaapa say what you want but I know something amazing happening when it’s happening I believe this is a rare man a true mad genius whom could literally change everything about the world today
@NoNeed4DisGuys
3 ай бұрын
This short start at the end of the point he made. Watch the full clip before you judge someone. Nowhere in this short did he say 1x1=2. We need to do better with researching people before calling them crazy. This man is an intellectual that may not be appreciated until after death, but more power to him and may his legacy live in. ✊🏾💯
@gianthills
2 ай бұрын
Yes he does say that if you watch the full thing
@akashgaur-ie2bz
2 ай бұрын
@@gianthills 1x 2 = ? 1 x 2 = 1 x (1+1) = 1x1 + 1x1 = 2 + 2 = 4 So, => 1 x 2 = 4 ? really?? 😂
@gianthills
2 ай бұрын
@@akashgaur-ie2bz nope. You're as confused as he is.
@btchiaintkidding7837
Ай бұрын
@@akashgaur-ie2bz thats not how you do RHS=LHS you clown. you gotta divide or multiply both sides with the same number. you cant just isolate a portion of one side and change(multiply/divide) it while you multiply/divide the whole of the other side
@Magneticitist
3 ай бұрын
To say 1x1 can equal 2, somebody needs to ask him what he thinks 1x2 or 2x1 is then.
@Slycoop
2 ай бұрын
He carries the 1 . That would be 3 in his world
@ZEiTLOZ
Ай бұрын
Yes he would say 3 😃
@natehughes5487
Ай бұрын
3 and 4
@soulcapitalist6204
25 күн бұрын
Or ask him if he is a flattard.
@huejorgan9224
3 ай бұрын
I'm just as confused as the next guy, but clearly there is something not right in the fact that 1X0=0 and 1X1=1. There is just that gut feeling that there is something seriously flawed with these 2 multiplications.Yes it is not as straight forward as multiplying numbers bigger than 1, but I would not be as dumb as some folks here who beat on their chest and say - but the calculator says otherwise.
@ZenathD
Ай бұрын
1x0 means: take one, zero times OR take zero, one times This will always equal zero. 1x1 is found in the same manner. How can there be something seriously flawed with the results coming from those operations?
@Message1inthesame
Ай бұрын
@@ZenathDbecause it doesn’t align with nature or objective reality.
@TheGiantMidget
Ай бұрын
@@Message1inthesameyou do realise that numbers are just symbols that represent quantities right? Like 2 x 4 just means 2 lots of 4. 1x0 would be one lot of 0. But it doesn't matter what arbitrary number you stick in front 0 in a multiplication it will be zero. Any hypothetical amount of zero is zero it's just an abstract notion
@rusluck6620
Ай бұрын
@@Message1inthesamelets say substance is 1 ml per g density. 0g of substance is 0 ml volume. meanwhile, 1g of substance is 1 ml volume wdym?
@ZenathD
Ай бұрын
@@whome1636 I disagree. Interpret instead that 1 actual thing taken zero times corresponds to this actual thing never being present in the first place. Conversely, nothing taken 1 time is still nothing. Then we have consistency. But we have no guarantee that mathematics correspond to the real world in the first place. By Gödels incompleteness theorem, we cannot even prove that mathematics itself is consistent. But we really hope that it is! We can, however, use it as a tool where we find it applicable and useful. Your interpretation renders multiplication by zero useless and mathematics is in some parts open to interpretation, so we interpret it in ways that make it useful to us - or at least we hope to do so.
@Saluteme10288
5 ай бұрын
I need his weed mayne number cause he fried
@melvinbrown9482
2 ай бұрын
1 is One all by itself, in order to multiply one by one; you must first add, one *equal* in value & substance , before you even start; therefore making it two or do the 1 magically appear out of nothing.
@preztjuswoman
2 ай бұрын
Thank you!!!!!!!
@kaibradburn-lewis7310
Ай бұрын
If I give you 1 thing 1 time you then have 1 thing. If I give you 2 things one time you then have 2 things. Simple maths
@DF-we4pt
Ай бұрын
No. You’re just flat out incorrect. You must first add before you multiply? Fukumean?
@mackman3294
Ай бұрын
By that logic yes you are correct however, 1*0 for example you cannot say if I give you 1 thing 0 times and so on. Are you pretending you're giving me 1 thing which is actually nothing? Why does the 1 even exist in the first place? By that logic only 0*0 equals 0 We have been taught that any number times 0 answer is 0 which in logic doesn't make sense, the number being multiplied by 0 shouldn't just disappear, it should still exist.@@kaibradburn-lewis7310
@btchiaintkidding7837
Ай бұрын
@@DF-we4pt 0 × 1 = 0 zero multiplied by anything real numbers(2, 3, 4 etc) will be zero. you camt have nothing (zero) and dive into multiplying it, you gotta add something(aka not zero) before multiplying it
@jahprime6932
3 күн бұрын
Multiply is to obtain from a number a specified number of things. It's simple. You're not multiplying if you're using 0 or 1.
@niyifowosire496
3 сағат бұрын
The thing is, people mistake a genius to be the one that answers, but his genius is not the one answering the question but rather asking, leading into deeper thought, in the case of 1*1, I believe the mistake is seeing the two 1s, as magnitude instead of seeing 1 as a function of magnitude and the other a function of location, it's a magnitude space relationship, rather than two magnitudes interacting, 1 event occurring in 1 place is 1, 1 event occurring in 1 places or locations is 2 and on and on, and 0 event occurring in one place is no event just a place or potential while an event with no place to occur wouldn't occur, giving rise to the multiple interpretations of 0 times any number or the other way round
@barrybuie740
Күн бұрын
With one movement pick up one object . How many things are in your hand? 1x1=1
@zenout3463
23 сағат бұрын
I wonder how people counted stuff before maths were found. I was just trying to think how it’d be done, but I guess it was just “ooh” for 1 item, “ooh ooh” for 2 items haha.
@noname-xq6tp
3 күн бұрын
Apparently THEY ain't better than a calculator.
@eventertainment9237
Күн бұрын
The Truth Hurts N they Freak Out!
@artuanmcgee9244
Күн бұрын
1x1 is saying you have 1, 1 time which is 1. Please do not swim on the deep end of a shallow pool and call yourself a deep sea diver.
@Whittmike2011
Күн бұрын
One, zero times is zero. One twice is two. One, once is one. Therefore one times one equals one!
@michellenelson5003
5 күн бұрын
This got me kick out school in the fifth grade because i I told my teacher one times one equals two and he told my mother I needed a tutor I told him you need a tutor.
@emmanuelijomah8163
14 күн бұрын
Actually what multiplication means is 2 × 1 = 2 in other words it means 2 in one place which is still 2 But 1 × 1 means 1 in one place which still leaves it single as 1 He's very smart and most of what he says are right bug this one can be seen in multiple different points of views
@listening2all
Ай бұрын
1 x 0 = 1
@kadelewis1363
5 ай бұрын
Then one time zero should be one
@8Platinum8
5 ай бұрын
zero one time is zero / 1 times zero is 1 / i can see this
@Bigdeal9898
3 ай бұрын
@@8Platinum8you changed the wording. 1 zero times is 0
@nateseven7172
17 күн бұрын
That’s what he says also lol
@user-sz8fl3zv3i
16 сағат бұрын
I was terrible maths until I started to use it in engineering. I love some of Terrences thoughts on the circle of life but 1 x 6 = 6, just as 1 x 32 = 32, just as 1 x 1 = 1 wakey wakey.
@m3rcf1ve53
6 күн бұрын
Bro found a loop equation and thought the math was wrong 💀
@azlyricssns
5 күн бұрын
Multiplication isn't an action therefore it doesn't require a reaction. 1x1 = 1 because multiplication is a representation of a value. 12, 6x2 and 3x4 are all the same thing in "different languages"
@wetteryan
4 ай бұрын
Everybody said I was crazy... YEAH THEY DID SAY THAT.
@staydiligent7325
2 күн бұрын
He got a point when I 1x1 these nuts it does equal 2
@habatone
Күн бұрын
I'm no mathematician, but how likely is it that an actor has stumbled upon mathematical truths that have passed most of us by?
@ussspirit4812
4 күн бұрын
Problem here is that multiplication is not defined correctly. Many define it repeated addition of a number to itself. That's the problem.
@syrotronic5278
5 сағат бұрын
1 Singular, It is not multiplied until it becomes 1+ 1 ....2 a multiplicable number and so on... The wording "Times" is another word to mutiply and 1 is a single number that is why you can't "Multiply" past it's singularity unless you add.
@dmill1136
27 күн бұрын
Love this guy!
@NhemLee
Күн бұрын
1 x 1 is the equivalent of saying there is one apple and 1 exists. 1x 2 is there is 1 apple and 2 exists. So 2 apples. 1x0 is there is 1 apple and 0 exists. So 0 apples.
@BlackHatGhostAnon5670
17 күн бұрын
People who call him crazy are the same kind as the ones who called Einstein crazy.
@GT1Vette
15 күн бұрын
Huh? We call him crazy cause there's countless proof that current math does work.
@BlackHatGhostAnon5670
15 күн бұрын
@@GT1Vette it doesn't though. That's his point...
@GT1Vette
15 күн бұрын
@@BlackHatGhostAnon5670 If his math is correct how can you explain everything that has been built & designed that works? That's my point.
@lukeatbrandynightful
14 күн бұрын
@@BlackHatGhostAnon5670if you went into McDonald’s and they charged you twice for 1 Big Mac, I guarantee you would go back to 1 x 1 = 1 real quick
@SilverbackVW
13 күн бұрын
@GT1Vette because it's based on straight line geometry and not curves...
@SBankzee
12 күн бұрын
Very interesting and makes sense anytime you multiply and two numbers it should not be the same number periodd!!!!!
@LaVieEnVioletV
4 ай бұрын
Get this guy a tutor and rehab. 😂
@davesaenz3732
9 күн бұрын
Yeah 1+1=2 Got it !! Multiplying is very different.
@JLW540
Ай бұрын
I love Terrence. When he got replaced on iron man I was so mad. I still like the other dude but Terrence is too cool
@rorydread831
17 күн бұрын
He's adding the result of multiplication to the input. He's not recognizing that the objective is just to get the multiply and then stop. Input 1 Out 1 Output added to input is 2 - this is a product of adding not multiplying.
@justinkurtrivera2315
14 күн бұрын
Then what's the definition of multiplication if 1×1 = 1 he's perspective is beyond linear thinking
@justinkurtrivera2315
14 күн бұрын
Multiplication is to multiply things to make it multiple
@toryburke137
2 ай бұрын
The reason he is correct come down to the meaning of words. Multi means more than 1. Ply means 1. So 1x1=2 or one more than one is 2. 1 is not more than one so it can not be a multiple.
@preztjuswoman
2 ай бұрын
God bless you. I can tell you aren't the average mind. Bless up!
@loveandlight4440
Ай бұрын
So, I am really, really trying to understand this. I understand the definition of "multi" and "ply." However, if we multiply 9×1≈9. Or is that wrong also?
@TheGiantMidget
Ай бұрын
That's not what multiply means in mathematics. Saying 2 x 4 means there are 2 occurrences of 4 which is the same thing as saying 4+4 which is 8. Multiply is literally just a shorthand way of saying add this number to itself x amount of times. Like instead of saying 4+4+4+4+4 just say 4 x 5. This isn't rocket science
@toryburke137
Ай бұрын
@@TheGiantMidget again you prove his point. Words, like numbers have meaning and function. You can not by definition multiply 1 or 0. Naturally numbers are a quantity, so to start with 4x0=4. 4 then add 0; as you say multiply means adding, I get 4 but you say I get 0, which makes more sense? He is saying the entire premise of multiplying 1 or 0 is unnatural and impossible.
@toryburke137
Ай бұрын
@@loveandlight4440 by definition you cannot multiply 1 or 0 is what he is saying. If to multiply is add a number to it's self by a number of occurrences. 9 by itself or 9 one time is not the same as 9x1; because 9 is a quantity and 1 is a quantity. 9 more than 1 is 10 or 9x1=10. Naturally numbers have meaning and function just like words.
@joet4302
7 күн бұрын
That guy with the headset has a punch me face all over lol
@user-gm2cj1om7s
24 күн бұрын
Math will need to be extremely precise for long distance space flight. Now if the fundamentals are broken then its impossible
@fahimscott6172
2 күн бұрын
Brother is correct
@jmcrapo32
6 ай бұрын
Multiplication is a derivative of space and matter. Say you have a square box that is 1ft x 1ft x 1ft. How much space is in that square? 1ft cubed, if it was just a square box it would be 1ft squared and just a length it would be 1 foot long.
@iB_throwin
6 ай бұрын
Perfect explanation
@ease3715
4 күн бұрын
It’s linear algebra and matrices.
@gordonmitchell729
Ай бұрын
The guys here are scared to admit that Terrence is correct. They are buttering him up but lost to the truth. IMO!
@rusluck6620
Ай бұрын
no truth to Terrence. i proved him wrong
@nateseven7172
17 күн бұрын
@@rusluck6620.. no you didn’t
@justinkurtrivera2315
14 күн бұрын
@@rusluck6620you didn't start from the way he explain about flower of life the underlying unified field of this existence
@orlandomilan6131
9 күн бұрын
Terrence looks "slammed"
@chanelbrown5688
9 күн бұрын
Lmfao are those my only 2 options 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@louveniaadams9440
3 күн бұрын
1 * 1 equals a minimum of three. Let me explain a man and a woman already too before any processes are made, according to natural law. Math is a representation of decoding life. It also is supposed to reflect with clarity of life. So how could one plus one equal to when 1 + 1 is already two before the equal sign before the processes of the operational sign is even done. 1 and 1 is 2 before anything happens 1 + meaning come together, with another entity of one cannot be too because two is already on one side of the equation. The equal sign means the processes of the operational sign Plus or division or multiplication means that something happened operational to add or subtract from the original existing parties. 2 already existed before any operational was included. So the true answer is x. And X has the option of equaling 3 - 9. Even with animals, two animals come together and have the option of having multiples instead of just the same numbers residing after the process has happened.
@louveniaadams9440
3 күн бұрын
@terrancehoward
@UnfadeabLe11
2 сағат бұрын
11 😂 lmfao
@Trippe83
3 ай бұрын
Very smart man for the most part, ad a very good actor but yhe crazy is off the charts
@ericerpelding2348
29 күн бұрын
If x = sqrt(2), then x^3= 2*sqrt(2) = sqrt(2) + sqrt(2). There is no lie programmed into the calculator.
@erkkivarv3373
17 сағат бұрын
to multiply means to increase a number by a given number.. if you increase 1 zero times.. you have still 1 but..lets be all the same and lets say. 1x0=0
@jimmybacas8003
Күн бұрын
One one times is one. Two one times is two. And so on
@edhall9656
2 күн бұрын
this is why they say "TIMES" 1 one time is 1
@absyl
6 ай бұрын
say you have 1 box of bananas and in that box there is 1 banana, how many bananas do you have?
@Lontay187
6 ай бұрын
You don't have a box of bananas. You have 1 banana in a box
@zeckybuzgheia6239
5 ай бұрын
2 bananas!!!😂
@ausarianheruhtp666
5 ай бұрын
You have however many bananas that are in that box.
@vladpadowicz5946
5 ай бұрын
I don't have any bananas, the box has the one banana 🤪🤣
@ailuosi7241
5 ай бұрын
that makes no sense. you can't have a box of bananaS if there is only 1 banana. bananas implies plural meaning more that one so how can you have a sigular plural. you make no sense at all. you would either have a box with a banana meaning 1 banana in a box or a box of bananas meaning an unspecified number of more than 1 banana in the box. but you can't have a box of bananas with only one banana in it. that logically and grammatically makes no sense.
@xvLucario
Күн бұрын
Quick clarification. He's basing his concept off of photon multiplication. Meaning if it makes another of its self by multiplication there would be 2. Interesting concept. Do your own digging pawns.
@dijayus4710
Күн бұрын
If I have 1 dollar only one times I have 1 dollar. If I have 1 dollar zero times, I have zero dollars. If I have 1 dollar two times I have 2 dollars. Does that make sense Terrence?
@Therealjtyler
2 ай бұрын
The best explanation to what terrance is referring to is Quantum physics
@bronxgmoney
14 күн бұрын
It's like when I'm right I'm right and when I'm wrong I could of been right so im still right because I could of been wrong
@alonmidasforexdaytradingin2784
Күн бұрын
2x2=4 3x3=9 4x4=16 etc… so 1x1 should =2 cuz all the others numbers doubled 🤷🏾♂️
@KyleErickson-hs2sz
14 күн бұрын
He must have turned the "+" sign on its axis to get "×"
@user-pl1dc5qv8q
4 ай бұрын
IF YOU HAVE 1 OBJECT TIMES ANOTHER OBJECT YOU HAVE 2 OBJECTS STILL!!!! YOU'RE THINKING OF INVISIBLE NUMBERS AND THINK IT APPLIES TO REAL LIFE
@sailor5853
3 ай бұрын
By your logic 4x4=8. And if I have 10k paper notes I have 10k dollars.
@nateseven7172
17 күн бұрын
@@sailor5853 shhhh go take a nap
@user-hh7ci7rm5h
5 күн бұрын
Stop forcing this dude, his arguments is absolutely ridiculous
@barryjayr
23 сағат бұрын
But if multiply means increase And 1x1=1 then that defeats the definition of multiply right? Or should we find another definition for Multiply? Because the definition of multi means more than 1 if I’m not mistaken. I promise I didn’t invent the word or definition. So in this case it’s safe to say 1 is impossible to multiply because multi means more than one so the equation (1x1) doesn’t exist
@freyasrulez
14 күн бұрын
If you scale 1 by a factor of 1, it is itself.
@metrach8901
5 ай бұрын
1x2 is two 1's add them you get 2. 1x1 is just one times itself which is 1 so therefore it cannot anything other than the initial number that is being multiplied, 1x1=1, 2x1=2, 3x1=3 and so on.
@markmahurin8891
14 күн бұрын
My calculator says 1x1=1. I see what he's saying. Each 1 is a separate character. You can't do anything other than add them because it's the product of both 1's in the equation. The other 1 doesn't disappear. Just like in 2x2=4. The 2nd 2 doesn't disappear.
@kuntreemastermason705
Күн бұрын
An octagon has eight sides and octopus has eight legs October is the 10th month we've been lied to our whole lives
@seanlattibeaudiere19
19 күн бұрын
always fun listening to people on shrooms
@Kevmaster2000
4 ай бұрын
Never forget this is the same guy that thought he should be paid an equal amount as the main star Robert Downey Jr, for playing a supporting character 😂. They were wise to ditch his stupid a$$ and get Don Cheadle.
@fishhunter3346
10 күн бұрын
The calculator is right.
@jervyharper206
15 күн бұрын
Slaute to you brother 🙏🏽
@KidSereneonxbox
6 ай бұрын
1x1 isnt equal to 1+1😂. Anything times 1 equals itself. The number 1, one time is still 1 lol.
@LA_Balduckz
5 ай бұрын
For a sec I was loosing my mind Thanks 😂😂😂
@jaysalazar4114
5 ай бұрын
2×2=4 but 2+2=4 I'll wait
@lukesgamingadventure8227
4 ай бұрын
@@jaysalazar4114wait for what?
@djehutimessou9376
4 ай бұрын
What you don't know and they don't teach you at school is that there are unlimited alternatives on solving a problem just like Universe, curve and multi-dimensional elliptical motions. Actually 1+1 isn't absolutely equal to 2. For instance, it depends on what you're adding together and what you're doing. Here is a basic example, if you have a couple made of 1 male (people) + 1 female (people), you can never have two. Actually, if they are very fertile, you can have a result greater than 3 people. You will end up with a lot of more people. So, for that point alone, all depends on what you're adding together. What the Cartesian mathematics programmed you to, is that all is linear and one-dimensional and there is only one absolute answer for all questions or problems, just like the West that wants to impose his so-called democracy or capitalism system to the whole world; while the world, Nature, humanity and Universe are made to be diverse. They make you think that mathematics is just about numbers. Mathematics is way beyond numbers and it didn't start with numbers. Numbers just express some parts of mathematics. Mathematics is actually the core of true humane human divine civilization of The First People who codified all these knowledge in cultures, traditions and rituals that those who came later couldn't understand because of paradigm differences. In addition, they are not the originators of what they misappropriated, so they misinterpreted them with their narrow limited way of thinking that they imposed on the whole world to satisfy their domination agendas. This happened with various invasions and destructions of Original First Civilizations; extinctions of groups of Original People to steal their lands, knowledge, wealth and identities; extinctions of various species; religions impositions; slavery; Colonization; imperialism and now neocolonialism. The First or Original People who are the true originators of all elements of human civilizations were very very advanced than the so-called Western civilization we have today, which has destruction, evil, and deceits as its mode of surviving because it is built on lies, theft, and barbarism. It can't last for too long. It's actually suffocating for its last moment because the descendents of the Original People like Terrence Howard are bringing the light and the true knowledge back. The Sun is rising back! "There isn't such thing as new inventions, all are just innovations of Ancient People's inventions who lived and studied everything possible hundreds of thousands years before us. The world is too old, for a new baby to proclame that he invented something new." (Maàma Ifatundé)
@kingofnuggets7304
4 ай бұрын
@@jaysalazar4114Anything times ONE equals itself , NOT everything times ITSELF equals itself . 1x1=1 2x1=2 3x1=3 Your example is 2 times ITSELF , "itself" of 2 is NOT 1 , two is two
@preztjuswoman
2 ай бұрын
He is correct. 1 and 1. Those are 2 digits not 1.
@TheGiantMidget
Ай бұрын
Yeah that would be 1+1 we all know that. 1x1 is 1 😂 do you know what multiplication actually means?
@magalygouveia4454
Ай бұрын
He is not.... 1x1=? means " write on the other side of the equals, the number one repeated only one time... what would you write??? Now... do the same exercise with another number. Ex: 3x2= ? "Write after the equals the number 3 repeated 2 times (3+3) ..... MISTERY EXPLAINED!!!!
@truthbetoldrecords6039
Ай бұрын
@@magalygouveia4454they don't know they been washed by the mental
@thelibyanplzcomeback
Ай бұрын
Then wouldn't 6+5 also equal 2?
@preztjuswoman
Ай бұрын
@@truthbetoldrecords6039 you didn't know that you and your family "been washed by mental"
@haljarrett1
5 күн бұрын
someone needs to ask him what 1x2 is then😂
@videogamesinthemorning
5 күн бұрын
He says 3
@demolitionkid2
5 ай бұрын
1 represents the whole or 1 of something. So 1 x 1 = 1
@RoyalWrapDiaries
5 ай бұрын
Right. But if u do 0 x one whole of SOMETHING…where are we at? That in itself isn’t mathing.I think there’s something here that we may be ignoring.
@demolitionkid2
5 ай бұрын
@@RoyalWrapDiaries because 0 is nothing......nothing times 1 is nothing
@HeinrichTheGr8
4 ай бұрын
@@demolitionkid2but how could you even have nothing one time?
@edisont.picard4112
4 ай бұрын
@@HeinrichTheGr8Think of it the other way. You don't have nothing one time. You have 1 no times.
@nateseven7172
17 күн бұрын
@@demolitionkid2 that doesn’t even make sense lol. Use objects this time lol
@Randy_King77
17 күн бұрын
This is proof. A matrix makes its own rules usually close to core operations (sog's) from the universe. He has shown you the only way to determine if a reality is truth or a matrix. Bravo! How? By proven their law of natural is malleable... It cant be both ways without breaking their own rules. Pay attention because all of creation will be seeing this in its final.. Absolutely fantastic... We're close to the door.
@geoffreyhansen284
5 күн бұрын
If you have 1 basket 🧺 with 0 apples then there are 0 apples 🍎 in the basket 🧺 vise versa if you have 0 baskets 🧺 and 1 apple 🍎 then there are 0 baskets with 1 🍎
@barryjayr
22 сағат бұрын
1 is a common factor of all whole numbers. 1 is the only factor of 1. So if we take 1 and do the rule of multiplication then yes 1x1=1. However when u look at the equation there u will see three 1’s Each number (1) plays an individual role. So if only 1 (2pac) is dead then we only have pac left. 🤔🤫 I do not blame anyone who is confused on what just happened, because we all know the definition of multi? Multiply? Multiple? It’s 1 government which is a team, They killed 2pac smh this shyt is krazy
@jasonjeffries3236
4 күн бұрын
He says he graduated highschool with a 1.6 grade point average and it shows
Пікірлер: 625