Suzuki is better choice, no guilt feeling where ever you go..
@marcusjackson4063
7 жыл бұрын
I have a 2017 Vitara S turbo and don't look back. Sorry but the vitara is best value for money, practical, good fuel consumption and has great visibility. Can't understand how a c-hr that costs way too much for what it is and has nothing of what I stated above can win. I think you guys need to check your reviewing. Even the hrv is better than the c-hr.
@derdachev
7 жыл бұрын
According to this review, the Vitara is 1k dollars more expensive. They are in the same class, so if the C-HR costs way too much for what it is, then the Suzuki is also too expensive.
@marcusjackson4063
7 жыл бұрын
I'd rather pay 1k more for visibility than have very little. Visibility is also a key feature to have in my opinion
@marcusjackson4063
7 жыл бұрын
derdachev plus I said for what it is. It's nothing special
@derdachev
7 жыл бұрын
nah, mate, I'm not criticizing you, you have your opinion. I mylself think too that the C-HR is quite unpractical but compensate with great looks (where the Suzuki fails IMO). Knowing that they both cost almost the same, I can't see myself buying the uglier one (again - IMO), no matter the slight difference in the practicality. Cheers :)
@marcusjackson4063
7 жыл бұрын
derdachev fair play. I'm the other way around I think the ch-r is pretty ugly. I dunno why I just prefer simple design myself. (That's why I bought the vitara) plus I think the vitara looks quite muscular and still looks somewhat sleek and modern. Personal opinion but i know heaps of people who agree with me. But also people who think it's not that great ( that's fine)
@sachinshinde5012
6 жыл бұрын
according to me Suzuki looks like a winner !!
@shgp1956
6 жыл бұрын
Suzuki far and away the best deal. How do I know? I have the Allgrip diesel 1,6 DDIS and it is a gem....
@steve30b
5 жыл бұрын
i have just bought a 2018 suzuki boosterjet s , fantastic car all round. i looked at a c-hr and the honda , not a patch on Suzuki..
@Neitajamaica
6 жыл бұрын
How can the most impractical vehicle win? Does not make sense, the vitara must be the clear winner here
@ronch550
6 жыл бұрын
Richard N I'm guessing it's a biased conclusion. Toyota vs Suzuki. We all know what people would think about that.
@zooks3894
7 жыл бұрын
Suzuki is the best of this group.
@alinmarta727
3 жыл бұрын
Great review! Seeing this in nov 2020, i think Suzuki now would be the better choice: it now has more safety features than before, it also has a mild hybrid system which makes it even more economical and it is cheaper than the Toyota CHR. Overall, i think Suzuki is better value now in 2020
@yeahnah1762
Жыл бұрын
i have a 2017 Trax and love it to bits. it doesn’t have any of those auto emergency systems or anything like that but i actually prefer it that way. i know the car won’t do anything of its own free will. and as for driving, i love it too.
@qasimansari7540
4 жыл бұрын
I went for the Vitara. HRV ran it close but was €4k more. Next time maybe.
@jackjohn381
4 жыл бұрын
Suzuki vitara should be the winner, I like this car, next is Honda HRV
@boypazaway5833
7 жыл бұрын
Practicality: I go for Suzuki Vitara/Escudo for the win.
@hawkesworth1712
7 жыл бұрын
I'll never understand why people keep complaining about the height of the door handles and the size of the side windows. Most 4x4s have handles at a similar height and yet I've never heard a reviewer pick that as a negative. Reviewers also need to be a bit more consistent because they complain about the lack of USB ports in the back and then complain about small windows. They need to get with times and ask themselves when was the last time a kid wanted to look out a side window. The fact that it's dark in the back seat would be considered by every kid on the planet who has a tablet or smartphone to be a plus.
@delavago5379
7 жыл бұрын
I never found them an issue. But what you said is true
@SharapovaFan
6 жыл бұрын
Not all car reviewers are knowledgeable, observant, objective or well-read. Heck, some are none of these. Some reviewers are ignorant, not very sharp, biased and grasping for straws with words -- hence they nitpick and look for things to say just for the heck of it, since it's supposed to be a "review".
@ronch550
6 жыл бұрын
hawkesworth1712 with SUVs it is totally expected that the door handles would be located high, unless you want them looking stupid down low. With this Ch-r however, it's like they just had to place it there for no apparent reason other than to look cool, which is kinda meh.
@harveybirdman74
7 жыл бұрын
The Toyota seems really impractical.
@James-qz1wd
7 жыл бұрын
It is. Style over substance seems to be going on here.
@ronch550
6 жыл бұрын
harveybirdman74 Toyota's design language is also so ???? these days. Ugh.
@ronch550
6 жыл бұрын
I really hate how a lot of these small crossovers don't even have a center storage console/armrest. Just feels like something is missing and yeah, makes it even more obvious that these things are built to a price. The Kona does have it though, which is potentially what would win me over the Vitara, which would be my hands-down choice for looks and equipment except for the absence of said center console. The Kona, however, has a bigger 2.0L engine in my country, potentially thirstier too. I'd much rather have Suzuki's 1.6L petrol because it may be more economical and I'm not a big fan of drag races anymore. I just want a comfortable, well-built, well-equipped, decent-looking, cheap to maintain, versatile car that's also not so expensive. In short, a car that'll get the job done decently enough at minimal cost.
@konczk
5 жыл бұрын
The facelift Vitara has just come out and it does have a centre console and armrest as standard. The 1.6 litre engines are gone, but the 1.4 T stays and can be had at all trim levels, not just the top S, so it will be cheaper to buy. There will also be a 1.0 turbo to replace the old 1.6 NA. From what I'm told it has more torque lower down the rev range, but peak power has gone down to 110 bhp. I think the 1.4 T in mid-level trim is an absolute bargain. It is already on sale here in Hungary ,where it's made, and the first reviews are out.
@ronch550
5 жыл бұрын
@@konczk thanks. That's good to know.
@ronch550
6 жыл бұрын
Surprising ending there. After all the praise heaped on the Vitara, the ch-r wins???
@charles6232
4 жыл бұрын
Just bought a C-HR, with a six speed manual! Goes well, and looks the part. A spaceship! All that is missing is a NCC Star fleet registration! Love it!
@shredder7584
7 жыл бұрын
Had our C-HR for about a month now, fantastic little car 👍
@Balint-gy5de
6 жыл бұрын
Suzuki the best
@HRHKENNEDYDENIKOLOWE
7 жыл бұрын
i also can't see toyota win ,suzuki win
@eileenr.c2009
7 жыл бұрын
HRH KENNEDY DENIKO LOWE vitara win (for me)
@jq747
7 жыл бұрын
He lost me as soon as he said the CHR's low horsepower is "helped by the CVT auto". Helped what, to go even slower? But in CHR's defence... people bitching about how bad and claustrophobic the back seat is, remember the "C" stands for "coupe".
@Hamachingo
7 жыл бұрын
A CVT can hold the engine at peak power rpm while modulating the gear ratio as the car speeds up. It's people that can't deal with the engine sound not changing pitch when accelerating so most CVTs simulate gear changes now and only switch back to the most efficient engine rpm once you're cruising.
@jq747
7 жыл бұрын
Except that (a) CVTs are even less efficient than regular autos, robbing the already paltry horsepower offered by most SUVs, (b) CVTs tend to be tuned for conservative fuel efficiency rather than sitting on 5,000 rpm, even in "power" mode.
@nathancormack9922
7 жыл бұрын
all car reviewers seem to be giving the CH-R a good wrap. didnt think much of it when it came out because of its styling but it must be a very good little car to drive. nice review guys. keep up the good work 🖒🖒🖒🖒
@DoctorJanakaWannaku
4 жыл бұрын
CH-R is far far behind Vitara from the performance, aesthetics and practicality.
@ronch550
6 жыл бұрын
Suzuki is *kinda* like the new Honda with some Hyundai value thrown in. Build them light, put in a punchy engine, great handling, throw in lots of toys, price competitively.
@stwg32
7 жыл бұрын
How can he declare the C-HR the winner? You need blueprints and a shoelace to squeeze in the rear.
@shigeoshirakura2670
3 жыл бұрын
In japan it called vezel it has map song radio
@bogdannegrut7372
2 жыл бұрын
Great 👍🏻 video, good job, keep it up
@korban814
6 жыл бұрын
How can you Criticize the Vitara for how it rides some bumpy road surfaces? This is the Turbo S Model with the stiffened suspension.
@kris-jm9el
4 жыл бұрын
Why vitara is so expensive in Australia in my country is 19000€ full extra ... And more economical from all others SUV
@SuperWHIZZO
7 жыл бұрын
Can't see that ( both the result and the view out of the C-HR'S back window) . Kids need a step ladder to open the back door handles . Vitara must win , over this this Toyota chocolate tea-pot .
@marcusjackson4063
7 жыл бұрын
SuperWHIZZO agreed, I test drove the vitara and Toyota c-hr and the Toyota Ch-r is a crapbox. The vitara was just so much better. The Toyota may have more safety features but they aren't important ones. Safety features is all it has. And that's why I bought a vitara
@drj2039
7 жыл бұрын
Marcus Jackson haha "aren't important ones"
@marcusjackson4063
7 жыл бұрын
I'm not being biased either just coz I own a vitara. The Vitara should win again. It's just a great car
@aussiele1
7 жыл бұрын
I test drove the C-HR and signed up that morning. It's brilliant on the road. Only drawback is the waiting time for it to be made and delivered.
@TukaSlave
5 жыл бұрын
OK, my 2c. Driving on bumpy unimproved rural roads is what sorts out the good, the mediocre, and the great. I know this because I twice owned a Peugeot 505, the best road car of them all in my opinion. The difference is in the suspension. The Suzuki has a torque tube, the Toyota has independent rear suspension. Torque tubes are OK in lightweight urban runarounds, where cost savings are the vital element. Only independent suspension can provide the sort of comfort that keeps you driving hundreds of miles in a blissful state of happiness. The Suzuki's stiffened sports suspension only exaggerates the shortcomings of the torque tube design. If car makers are serious about making great cars, they will provide independent suspension in every model. The influence of female customers have affected this matter - females are generally unaware of a bad ride, as they sit on more ample unpholstery. And because they are also generally not aggressive or fast drivers (which is why safety equipment, which ruins cars by adding weight and creates hideous designs to protect pedestrians, who should not be on the road anyway, has become so prominent in design choices), suspension specifications have fallen by the wayside. For example, Peugeot suspensions of the past were famously effective. The recipe was fairly soft springs, for bump absorption, coupled with complex four stage dampers made in house by Peugeot. One man was in charge of the suspension, and he did brilliant work for over thirty years. His designs could compete with Mercedes Benz and Rolls Royce for comfort and road holding. Current Peugeots are simple urban runabouts by comparison, and far less capable on difficult roads. Perhaps the spread of smooth motorways and even surfaces in urban settings has discouraged the effort of making cars comfortable in Europe, but in the Antipodes, our roads are atrocious. In this comparison, it is the Toyota that has independent rear suspension. That is why it wins. Case closed.
@komangariantha8675
7 жыл бұрын
love the c-hr just cant afford it...
@metcard
7 жыл бұрын
The CHR would be sweet with a 2JZ.
@john-danielmartin2097
7 жыл бұрын
so where was the xv
@ronaldov09
7 жыл бұрын
Honestly Honda, just drop the 1.5T in the HR-V already! Oh and offer it with a manual.
@kolyan1980
7 жыл бұрын
CH-R= overpriced teenagers hatchback
@raifbayraktar7218
Жыл бұрын
logic choise;Suzuki Vitara.
@ronny302
5 жыл бұрын
The Toyota wins, if you want a spaceship looking car. Seriously, who wants such a wrinkled looking car to drive? Suzuki wins for me by a mile.
@randomideas7799
5 жыл бұрын
LODS OF SPACE, LODS OF SPACE! HE MUST BE CRAZY! THE CH-R IS SO TINY, ONLY TWO PEOPLE CAN SQUEESH IN IT ! HES PROBABLY ADVERTISING TOYOTA!😲
@pakperfect498
6 жыл бұрын
Bezel and toyota have nice colours
@pakperfect498
6 жыл бұрын
Sry vezel and chr
@bellayou4528
6 жыл бұрын
I live in VICTORIA AS WELL!!!!!!!🙀🙀😸😹😻
@jeffreysegal2065
7 жыл бұрын
The extreme camera angles seem to be trying to hide the actual looks of the cars. Don't you want us to see them?
@caradvice
7 жыл бұрын
If you would like to see still images of the cars there is a photo album on the comparison story. www.drive.com.au/new-car-reviews/small-suv-comparison-toyota-chr-v-holden-trax-v-honda-hrv-v-suzuki-vitara-s-20170404-gvdrwj.html
@hondatrix
7 жыл бұрын
Paid for by????
@caradvice
7 жыл бұрын
Drive.com.au
@justaguy5947
6 жыл бұрын
cheap plastic doors.. do you have solid timber doors in your house?
@GregTyson
7 жыл бұрын
This reviewer may not like Holden cars but he obviously likes meat pies.
@kengoodwin7461
2 жыл бұрын
You speak of tyer noise, easy fix put tyers on that curtale any road noise, problem solved. I put them on all my cars.
@Nerven86
7 жыл бұрын
Where is Nissan Qashqai ???
@jasonshreeve5269
7 жыл бұрын
Nerven1986 in early retirement, until Nissan decide its time to update it and and give it a facelift to be new again against its rivals.
@troutstalker7855
7 жыл бұрын
is kw same as horsepower.?
@ssaannddrro
7 жыл бұрын
No
@ronch550
6 жыл бұрын
trout stalker 1hp = 0.7457kW
@TechnoShuffler909
6 жыл бұрын
god damn wheres the Hyundai Kona.... 1.6T
@wheresmycheese8511
7 жыл бұрын
CH-R takes about 12 seconds to get to 100kph haha. I have a 96 SEAT Ibiza that does it in 10.7
@justaguy5947
6 жыл бұрын
it's not Holden. it's cheap GMC.
@aussiele1
7 жыл бұрын
YAY! The C-HR wins again. I can't wait til my new Toyota baby arrives in June/July!!
@mohdpazli
7 жыл бұрын
no CX3
@julesmckain1273
7 жыл бұрын
does he hit a snake at 1:43?!
@Xiaoyu17
6 жыл бұрын
Jules Mckain yeah
@IonutAlexandruConstantinescu
6 жыл бұрын
Nice observation! :) Animal cruelty:))
@adityawarman4628
7 жыл бұрын
very nice... C-HR 👍👍
@mrdot1126
7 жыл бұрын
the thtuth is.. the old cars had tiny B and C sections ( pillars), but over time it got borring.. there is only so much you can do with it and make a car unice ans stylish.. if you want something wilde, something else, you need to sacrefice some things..
@dcspits
4 ай бұрын
0:20 suzuki leaking
@mdsohelsiddki7446
6 жыл бұрын
tk.
@ericmiranda9841
7 жыл бұрын
Vitara non available in US....
@user-gx4cl2ww1q
7 жыл бұрын
toyota very good
@randomideas7799
5 жыл бұрын
The Trax , CR-V and Vitara where good sellers until the little poo came, called the ch-r! The ch-r is the stinkiest and smallest SUV ever! How do people buy the little stinky poo called the ch-r , I don't know! People are idiots! Buy the Holden, people!☺😊😀
@cathf7384
7 жыл бұрын
Cx3 better than them all
@ossa60
6 жыл бұрын
toyota's visibility is crap and the trax is a piece of shit.....
Пікірлер: 94