I was in the market for a new 2024 LT with a 5.3L. When at the dealership I found a new 23 LT Silverado 4X4 with the 3L Duramax this truck had a sticker of 58k but it had 11k In rebates since it was a new 23 model. Got this for 47k and so far it’s been a great engine and purchase.
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Good buy!! Nice work!
@adkgrass
4 ай бұрын
i just got 31.3 mpgs highway on my 2023 LT Trailboss Duramax. So far I've had it for a year now and I am quite happy with it. I came from a 2020 6.2L Trailboss but was surprised to see the LZ0 engine provides great power still. Obviously not the same as the 6.2L but that said, I actually really love the 3.0L Duramax. For a little diesel it even has some great sounds to it.
@CTECH-REVIEW
4 ай бұрын
Heck ya!!
@gunsho11b
6 ай бұрын
Im getting around 34 to 36 mpg's on the highway with my 2024 3.0 Duramax. Mind you I have the RST trim with the 3.23 axel ratio and 20 inch tires. Mine also has the column shifter (mechanical shifter) which I prefer. I use it as my daily driver and drive almost 20 miles one way to work along with sporadic around town driving. I fill it up once every two weeks. My previous truck was a 2019 RAM with the 5.7 Hemi and I was filling that thing up at least once a week. I cannot speak for the 5.3 liter engine but despite Diesel being almost a $1 more a gallon in my area (NE Ohio) I am spending overall less in fuel. So far no issues and I could not be happier.
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
great to hear! thanks for watching
@itsshadowuser9536
5 ай бұрын
def want to get a diesel soon in ohio as well i drive 600miles a week minimum and i think going the diesel would be the best option for me for a truck its either the truck or a prius
@MsAce0424
5 ай бұрын
Good to read this. I'm From NE ohio. Same gas prices obviously. Might Be buying one too. I just wish i knew the long-term reliably
@itsshadowuser9536
5 ай бұрын
@@MsAce0424 right hopefully over 200k
@vinnypazzo
4 ай бұрын
I am from NE Ohio as well. Been considering getting one. I do a lot of driving for my job. Only thing I’ve heard is that these have transmission issues… but can’t find a whole lot supporting that.
@saxel1989
4 күн бұрын
For someone who would like some real diesel numbers here you go! 64752 miles Total gallons 2920. Total dollars put in 13641.75 includes def and oil changes and 4 new tires. Cost per mile so far .21 with maintenance. Next on my to do list is diff service and transmission flush. Average mpg 22.3 best 31.5. Worst 8.75 towing max weight in winter.
@CTECH-REVIEW
4 күн бұрын
Thank you for that data. Very impressive. Thank you for shairing
@bradscott9865
11 күн бұрын
I switched from a 21 RST 5.3 to a 24 Trailboss 3.0 duramax and I couldn't be any happier. The 3.0 tows a trailer much better and the fuel mileage is crazy. My 1,700 mile average including some light towing is 27 MPG and I can get up to 40 highway. My 5.3 had an engine failure at only 9,000 miles too. I'll never go back.
@CTECH-REVIEW
10 күн бұрын
Sounds like you have a nice trail boss, enjoy. Thanks for watching! What ended up going bad on the 5.3?
@bradscott9865
8 күн бұрын
@@CTECH-REVIEW Lifters
@Ekimsnegdoh27
7 ай бұрын
FYI with this new key fob you don’t need to hit lock first to remote start. Just hit remote start twice and it will lock the truck for you if it’s unlocked. One less step. Cheers
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching, good to know!
@Constricting_Creations
4 ай бұрын
I’ve owned a 2023 and a 2024 3.0L trailboss LT and a 2024 trailboss custom with the 5.3L. I like the 3.0L much more for a few reasons. I would get the 18’ rims (they come with much better tires) and if you get an LT I would spend the extra cash for the leather package, it’s a significant upgrade for the money.
@CTECH-REVIEW
4 ай бұрын
Awesome comment! Thanks for watching!
@nick4030
7 ай бұрын
One thing that I didnt see mentioned is that the diesel is getting the worst mileage its going to get brand new. As it breaks in the mileage increases dramatically. For example, and this is anecdotal but still representative, my fathers 2021 1500 AT4 with the 3.0 L duramax now with 30k miles is averaging over 30mgp and up to 35 freeway.
@redcapote4760
7 ай бұрын
While that is awesome, if the price difference is going to be $8-10k for the diesel engine over the gas engine, plus tax on that engine price difference, plus DEF costs... I wouldn't break even in cost until I drove at least 700,000 miles or so, assuming the majority of that was highway mileage. By that point, I'd more than likely need a new engine. While all of us like seeing 30+ mpg on our road trips instead of 21 or 22 mpg, the math just doesn't math for diesel. The only real reason to get the diesel is if you truly need a 2500 or 3500 HD truck because you are actually doing some heavy hauling of a very heavy trailer, camper, boat, or otherwise, because you need the towing power of the diesel that a gasser would struggle with. If you aren't towing very heavy, diesel just doesn't math out versus gas. Furthermore, I think diesel's future is waning over the next 20 years in the US, and the supply will lessen, which means prices will increase for it, creating an even smaller diminishing return on this debate for diesel.
@danquenell
7 ай бұрын
@@redcapote4760 The diesel is a $2,500 premium over the 5.3, 6.2 is also a $2,500 premium over the 5.3. In the higher trims such as my Denali Ultimate the diesel was $995 cheaper than the 6.2. The premium for the diesel in the 1/2 ton isn’t like HD trucks.
@nick4030
7 ай бұрын
There is still more to the story though. Diesel was gaining in popularity in the 2000's and into the 20-teens, until diesel gate. For some reason the EPA has decided to take aim at diesel. But theres a lot to unpack there. First, diesel is FAR more energy dense than gasoline. It also requires less refining. Less refining= less energy in production. All of this is important. Gas engines are similarly getting hit with combustion emission restrictions that are requiring filters and all of that as well, it is coming. Diesels do emit more NOX, but less CO2, which seems to be what the environment alarmists are worried about. Diesels do have a higher up front cost, but they also hold that value, generally, far better than gas equivalents do. To your point, the diesel will likely hit that 700k mileage, most gas engines will not.@@redcapote4760
@redcapote4760
7 ай бұрын
@@nick4030 I get bored of cars after 3 years. I need to make enough money to just lease for 24 months and switch often. Driving out of warranty scares me.
@redcapote4760
7 ай бұрын
@@nick4030 That was a very informative and insightful response. I appreciated reading it. Thank you.
@sodbuster518able
6 ай бұрын
120 volt plug 🔌 in bumper is for Block heater not glow plugs,most all Diesel have block heater for extreme cold temperature to aid in cold starting.
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment!
@jaronritchie2372
7 ай бұрын
I promise you this, that most 5.3l Trail Boss owners are only getting around 15-18 mpg average. While most 3.0 Trail Boss owners are getting around 24-26 average mpg. I only say this, because overall cost of ownership is about the same long term unless you can buy diesel for 25cents a gallon more lol
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching...I messed up...I just Edited. I got 18.3MPG not 21.5MPG...I got the miles and MPG mixed up. Sorry for the confusion.
@jaronritchie2372
7 ай бұрын
@@CTECH-REVIEW my Trail Boss 3.0 is currently getting around 23 mpg with my heavy foot. 6500 miles on it.
@phototac9287
6 ай бұрын
Actually your wrong I have a 2023 5.3 trail boss and highway is 23 miles per gallon would not buy a diesel def fluid is the deal breaker for me I also paid 63.700 for LT premium with equal equipment from an owners perspective.
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!@@phototac9287
@phototac9287
6 ай бұрын
Also you didn't have the tires at the manufacturer recommend tire pressure also will effect miles per gallon.
@josephcaron6904
7 ай бұрын
you read the miles traveled on the 5.3 not the MPG which was 18.3
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thank you...I fixed as much as I could! Thank you for watching!
@tomhenry5293
2 ай бұрын
Yep, a difference of 7.2 mpg. That's quite a bit. With a 24 gallon fuel tank that's a 172.8 miles extra on a tank of fuel. The diesel please!
@charlesludwig9173
5 ай бұрын
My 5.3 delivers 17 to 20 mpg on my city route depending on stop duration and either a light or heavy foot on accelerator pedal. Heavy foot is usually required to maintain speed with flow of traffic.
@CTECH-REVIEW
5 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching!
@Boobtube.
7 ай бұрын
it is the Z71 option that gives you the duel exhaust with bumper cutout for the tips. You had mentioned something about engines. That is not the case.
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thank you for the note! Thanks for watching!
@wasuptho
Ай бұрын
Nice video. I just bought a diesel high country. I cant believe it gets such better gas mileage than the tundra i had lmao😂
@CTECH-REVIEW
Ай бұрын
Good choice!
@user-dm8vf9vp6s
6 ай бұрын
Agreed. 2.7 turbo I4 makes 47 more ft lbs of torque than 5.3 V8 and at 3,000 rpm, vs 4100 rpm. Dyno tested wide open throttle 'for weeks" straight. Aluminum alloy pistons w/ machined heads and cast iron ring carriers. Diesel grade rings w/ tri-metal rod bearings w/ layer of copper over aluminum w/ steel backing. 10:1 compression w/ boost pressures up to 27 p.s.i. w/ intercooled twin volute turbo. Ford has done a small displacement turbo for nearly a decade (2.7 twin turbo V6). Makes 25 more horse, but 30 ft lbs less than GM turbomax. GM OHV V8 been around since 1949. Time for new blood.
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Love it! Thanks for watching!!
@iisreset
Ай бұрын
Fantastic comparison! good job
@CTECH-REVIEW
Ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it, and thanks for watching!
@freidrichnietzsche6643
5 ай бұрын
Not flaming or trolling here as I'm considering going with this engine in a ZR2, but just wait until that little duramax breaks in a little, the torque converter wears some and loosens up. YMMV but that mileage performance will drop. I haven't seen a video yet with mileage numbers for one of these trucks with over 100k miles... fwiw. My 6.2 L86 (2016 LTZ) had much better mileage new than now @ 163k. Good video and thanks for making!
@CTECH-REVIEW
5 ай бұрын
There are a few guys on YT that have posted some 100-150k mile reviews on the LM2 3.0l duramax, but I completely agree with you...when you get some miles on a little duramax you are more likely of having more expensive repairs than a tried and true V8! Thank you for watching, and I am glad you enjoyed! I have a lot of towing comparison videos also you can check out!
@karlschauff7989
3 ай бұрын
There are several trucks with over 100k miles on them featured in videos on youtube. Some components wear and decrease efficiency. Other components break in and increase efficiency. It's also up to the owner. Changing diff fluid, having the transmission fluid and filter changed from time to time, servicing the transfer case, etc can maintain fuel economy. Diesel engines also have better cylinder liners and rings than gas engines.
@7R4dicalized
Ай бұрын
really enjoyed the video
@CTECH-REVIEW
Ай бұрын
Thank you for watching!
@jbhampto
7 ай бұрын
Thanks for doing these tests. Very insightful. In one of your previous videos the ZR2 1500 3.0 diesel mpg was around 18mpg but this Trailboss 3.0 diesel mpg was ~25mpg. I'm surprised at such a big difference but maybe the loop was different or is the ZR2 that less efficient?
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
The previous video of ZR2 1500 I drove that got 18mpg was the 6.2l V8 gas engine...the 5.3l Trailboss Z71 got 18.3MPG
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching, and your comments! more good stuff to come!
@jbhampto
7 ай бұрын
@@CTECH-REVIEW thanks. I got confused:)
@kristoferfc6525
7 ай бұрын
@@CTECH-REVIEWthe zr2 also comes with 33's and the TB has 32's as well
@melvinjohnson2074
6 ай бұрын
If it wasn't for the DFM system on the 5.3 that likes to self destruct I would agree with that choice.
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Great point! Thank you for watching
@mr.martinezchemistry6471
15 күн бұрын
You can always turn that off, did that with my C7 corvette.
@user-dm8vf9vp6s
6 ай бұрын
2023 Custom Crew Cab 4wd 2.7 I4 turbo new (w/ 40 miles on it) $50,500 sticker. Incentives, gm card earnings, etc ($6,000 worth was 2.7 turbo vs 5.3) brought down to $36,800 (+ tax). 87 octane gas. A couple mpg better than 5.3. Same tow rating & payload. Why pay additional $6 for potential 5.3 dfm lifter failure?
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@readyme
4 ай бұрын
I'd like to see the same comparison with the non lifted truck (RST, LT etc) as I can imagine the offroad capabilities of the TrailBoss work against on road efficiency.
@CTECH-REVIEW
4 ай бұрын
i did it with Sierra just not the Silverados! I will try to do this again!
@readyme
4 ай бұрын
@@CTECH-REVIEW that's probably close enough. What were your findings?
@caseofruns735
7 ай бұрын
LOVE THIS VIDEO THANK YOU
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! Have a great day!
@8bajwa8
6 ай бұрын
5.3 did 18.3MPG. I guess you misread the miles vs MPG.
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching...yes dyslexia kicked in...I updated the Thumbnail but couldn't edit video after publishing.
@user-lx2oc3bu6h
Ай бұрын
You mentioned the 5.3 being a rock solid engine. But you failed to mention the AFM cause major issues with the Lifters / pushrods /cams. If you don’t deactivate the AFM with a tune, I don’t see that engine getting a 100 miles. With AFM off I would agree that it’s a good motor.
@CTECH-REVIEW
Ай бұрын
Yes good point!
@AlexanderRamsey
3 ай бұрын
Love the standard size sunroof way cheaper and more reliable than gigantic Ford pano roof.
@CTECH-REVIEW
3 ай бұрын
A lot of truth here!
@karlschauff7989
3 ай бұрын
It's silly comparing cost per mile of the diesel vs the 5.3. The Duramax makes 5.9 Cummins level torque. More torque than any other engine you can get in a Silverado 1500. 495 lbft vs the 5.3's 383 lbft. And it isn't shutting off cylinders to get more than 20 mpg.
@CTECH-REVIEW
3 ай бұрын
All very true. Just sharing different perspectives
@OtisFlint
7 ай бұрын
Diesel is $1.20 more per gallon in my area. Makes no economic sense to buy the diesel. More maintenance costs, more repair costs, no savings at the pump.
@disneybaker5165
7 ай бұрын
Say that when your lifter shit the bed
@coreydickey3657
6 ай бұрын
@@disneybaker5165 3k easy replacing mine >
@sodbuster518able
6 ай бұрын
I,ll stick with my 2.7L I4 that will out last both with out the $3000.00 repair Bill for rubber band drive belt mandatory @150,000 mi or gamble on engine self destruction into bucket 🪣 of scrap metal.
@hajjdawood
3 ай бұрын
If you are getting the 6.2l you need premium which is usually comparable or more expensive then diesel. Also the maintenance is an old wives tale. Oil changes are the same as rhe 5.3. Def costs $10 every 5,000 miles, fuel filters are super cheap and no need to replace spark plugs If you are getting the 5.3 enjoy your lifters lel.
@MattN03
7 ай бұрын
I read a lot of complaints about the GM leather seat comfort in the newer trucks. Are the cloth seats more comfortable?
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
I have read that too...I have driven over a dozen 24 SIerra and Silverado Leather seat trucks now and have not noticed this issue. I think it depends on a lot of things but for me 6'0 tall they dont bother me.
@gabe9158
7 ай бұрын
I had a 2021 with leather seats Chevy trucks have the most uncomfortable leather seats out of all three I now have a 2023 I bought 6 months ago I made sure I got cloth much better!
@TheRelentless817
5 ай бұрын
@@gabe9158 I also have a 2021 LT TB thinking about getting a 23/24 model. How much you paid for the 23?
@gabe9158
5 ай бұрын
64,000
@major3336
5 ай бұрын
Does the increase in MPG really minimize the higher price of diesel?
@CTECH-REVIEW
5 ай бұрын
That is a great question...it really depends on the cost of fuel for each...I have seen it go both ways! Thanks for watching.
@sodbuster518able
6 ай бұрын
Best engine in GM lineup and best bang for you buck is the 2.7 L Inline 4 .300 hp 430 ft lb torque 21 or greater fuel mileage that cost $1.00 LESS per gallon,no DEF required and no $3000.00 mandatory repair bill to change out a stupid rubber band to drive oil pump.Just another way to get you to spend $80,000 or greatet for your next truck .My 2.7 acts exactly like a Diesel,got a credit for that engine option, more payload capacity.The the 2.7 will out last the 3.0 hands down with proper maintenance and operation of it within it,s means
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! The 2.7l is an awesome engine, I agree!
@TA-co5mv
5 ай бұрын
I think it's a little early to say the 2.7 will outlast the 3.0. Actually way early. But in 20 years you may actually be right. But doing the math, 30mpg vs 20 mpg will add up, depending on the never ending price disparity between gas and diesel
@billrosenfelt3827
2 ай бұрын
doesn't the 2.7 require Super unleaded? that's about the same price as diesel where I live
@ANG1940
7 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching, I am glad you enjoyed!
@inferidii
Ай бұрын
Waiting on a 5.3 l custom trail boss , are there still any lifter failures still happening ? Stressing me out a bit
@CTECH-REVIEW
Ай бұрын
My understanding is this is still an issue. I know of 2 people with 2023 trucks that have had this happen.
@inferidii
Ай бұрын
Ah damn well I'll trade it at the dealer when the warranty expires and I'll get the extended one
@bobeastman6699
5 ай бұрын
When you looked at the MPG on the 5.3 you said 21.5 mpg but that was the miles on the left and the MPG was 18.3 on the center could you please clarify this or am i missing something. Thank you
@CTECH-REVIEW
5 ай бұрын
I know! I made a mistake. I did update the thumbnail! Sorry for the error, thank you for watching!
@bobeastman6699
5 ай бұрын
Sorry i did see that after i looked a little harder but i had already sent my question. Over all i like the Duramax but never owned a diesel before but the mileage seems to be really sweet on a daily driver. Wish i knew Thanks for getting back to me. Liked your video Bob@@CTECH-REVIEW
@lazerusmfh
6 ай бұрын
70k for a half ton not even fully loaded holy shit
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@matthewbradley8226
Ай бұрын
The diesel has far more expensive repairs. You have to pay for def fluid. And the maintenance is much more expensive. I’ll take the simple 5.3
@CTECH-REVIEW
Ай бұрын
Good point!
@esmoglo
5 ай бұрын
Interesting price for 1/2 ton trucks, with the price of diesel don’t see how it makes sense.
@CTECH-REVIEW
5 ай бұрын
Great point! Thanks for watching!
@aaronscalise7682
2 ай бұрын
steering wheel is nice and crooked when going straight. ridiculous considering that is fresh off the lot.
@CTECH-REVIEW
2 ай бұрын
Not good!
@panthermartin7784
3 ай бұрын
Both of those trucks wouldn't make it through their warranty period without a catastrophic failure. Thats what they have in common.
@CTECH-REVIEW
3 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching
@hujek111111
7 ай бұрын
Does 5.3 still has cylinder deactivation system in 2014?
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
It has a newer version that allows the engine to modulate between 1 and 8 cylinders. I believe that started in 2019.
@inferidii
Ай бұрын
Do they have less lifter failure ?
@disneybaker5165
7 ай бұрын
Why doesn’t the LT have cup holders in rear? My 2020 trailboss LT has them
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
My understanding is that option comes on the higher trim level LT
@stre622
7 ай бұрын
Better check probably a recall!
@LowOnCash
6 ай бұрын
You read it wrong it was 21 miles on the trip - not 21.5 MPG - the MPG was 18 - Mike
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching , and thanks for the comment Mike!...Dyslexia kicked in! I changed the thumbnail but couldn't change the video!
@LowOnCash
6 ай бұрын
LOL hey its fine thanks ffor your efforts the video was fine ride safe Mike
@SacLab
7 ай бұрын
Gas gets 18.2MPG !!!! NOT 21.5 lol
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
yes! thank you...I had to fix that after posting.
@jasonfinley5298
6 ай бұрын
There is no “z” in Diesel….ugh The plug in the front bumper is for the engine block heater, not the “glow plugs” 🤦♂️
@CTECH-REVIEW
6 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching
@user-wh2dx8ro9v
5 ай бұрын
Mr diesel was German, so yeah his name is pronounced diezel. You yanks all sound like fools when you say diesel and pronounce the s
@timclark7183
7 ай бұрын
The 5.3 got 18.3 you drove 21.5 miles
@CTECH-REVIEW
7 ай бұрын
Yes, Thank you for watching, I ended up having to edit thumbnail! sorry for the confusion.
@timclark7183
7 ай бұрын
I wish they did do that well on MPG. Keep up the good reviews!
@TA-co5mv
5 ай бұрын
Put a decent sized fuel tank in already GM!!! So I can sell this pos Ecodiesel. Range matters!!!
@CTECH-REVIEW
5 ай бұрын
I agree Range is important!!
@joshtaylor1416
2 ай бұрын
You don’t buy trucks for mpg. 🤷♂️🤦♂️
@CTECH-REVIEW
2 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@ML-lg4ky
7 ай бұрын
60k for a light duty FU!
@dieseldawg7132
4 ай бұрын
67k for cloth seats 😂😂😂
@CTECH-REVIEW
4 ай бұрын
The 'new normal'! Thanks for watching!
@na4valve
3 ай бұрын
5.3 with a 3.23 gear. Poor truck.
@CTECH-REVIEW
3 ай бұрын
Haha!
@OscyJack-
7 ай бұрын
Gas. The fed killed diesels benefit is. And don't get the new pansy trucks, go back and time for a real truck :)
@johnmorris77
7 ай бұрын
Not everyone wants to drive 15 year old trucks brother. I know what you mean though
@OscyJack-
7 ай бұрын
@@johnmorris77 I know. It's those people I'm calling out really, those who drive the OEMe to make shit, rather than trucks ;)
Пікірлер: 154