Pastor Asscherick is the bomb. I could listen to him until the end of time. He is mindblowing.
@leathagriffin2935
9 жыл бұрын
I like the way David teaches the word of God.
@jefforygraham5056
9 жыл бұрын
he is a wonderful preacher who doesn't seek to compromise the truth of the bible
@graceyow3392
2 жыл бұрын
28:30 astounding insight. thank you david! how awesome is the god we serve! what mind can create such system by the word of his mouth in 6 days!!! why do we limit ourselves to finite minds? god does share his wisdom with man, but his needs to be the jump off point and final verification point for testing what our finite minds seem to apprehend and comprehend.
@shinhuatchiew1987
9 жыл бұрын
Amazing..
@rainmayercoffee
9 жыл бұрын
Ivan Clarke has a gallery in Queenstown. He's an amazing artist and maybe Asscherick was talking about him. :)
@graceyow3392
2 жыл бұрын
17:58 only the first day was recorded in numeral form. the rest where in ordinal form: second-seventh. see comment below what the significance of this is.
@maniwakipeter
4 жыл бұрын
AMEN
@xxxchurch100
5 жыл бұрын
Have you ever thought about the word "universe " ? Uni = 1 Verse = text . What one verse/text do you think would "sum up " that meaning ? Genesis 1 : 1 fits perfectly. And John 3 : 16 fits with what has gone wrong and the exit strategy .
@d.ryanwebb1166
4 жыл бұрын
'Verse' does not mean 'text'. It comes from the Latin word meaning 'to turn'.
@chowman007
8 жыл бұрын
David, "Why do God Speaks", I would add to the thought, God thought, therefore He communicates.
@graceyow3392
2 жыл бұрын
19:22 for seven days...can't mean each and every day one is in that island for 24 hours. one may have arrived anytime during that calendar day and leave anytime during that calendar day. this is precisely the reason why "evening and morning one day (second etc day) had to be written. there is no mistaking this is not a symbolic, poetic, etc. account, but in real earth days according to god's reckoning of when a day starts and ends.
@graceyow3392
2 жыл бұрын
21:29 scholar scholar. the word of god does not need scholarly work to be understood. it needs the mind of god to explain through the holy spirit if prayed for. james assures us such wisdom from the correct understanding of god's word will be given when asked. we also need to appreciate that god only gives our finite minds what it needs to know. we do not teach babies quantum physics.
@graceyow3392
2 жыл бұрын
15:28 god created by the WORD of his mouth. the WORD only TOOK ON flesh when the holy spirit overshadowed mary for her to conceive jesus, the WORD.
@graceyow3392
2 жыл бұрын
11:00 evening and morning one (h256 echad) day...established length of day-sunset to sunset not really because there was no man-made time device then but that man-made devices are not accurate like god-designed system of counting time of how long each day is, how long a month is, how long a season is; how long a year is ^_^. evening and morning second (h8415 sheni) day etc.establishes that there was no other creation other than what started the day before. all other evenings and mornings have ordinal numbers are them.
@graceyow3392
2 жыл бұрын
20:08 time a little more elastic. those folks are illogical. how can the plants exist without sun for a hundred, a thousand, a million years? that is what happens when the word of god is made to accommodate the word of man. how can a finite mind know more or better than an infinite mind? david could rightly claim that he was wiser than the wisest of old. he meditated on god's word day and night. the wisest of old only mulled over finite minds' words.
@IvanBuck
9 жыл бұрын
It does not matter what word was used in an ancient text. What matters is what does real evidence point toward and advance discovery. Young earth creationism is demonstrably false.
@thadofalltrades
8 жыл бұрын
+Ivan Buck Do you believe God or man?
@IvanBuck
8 жыл бұрын
What scientists uncover in fields like this is how the natural world works, They do not necessarily know what they will find as they explore it. But as the discoveries are made, that is nature revealing to us who she really is and not man just making things up. What I am opposed to is religious dogma forbidding people from asking the questions or forcing them to ignore evidence for the sake of ideology. That kind of thinking is what is referred to as "cultic"
@thadofalltrades
8 жыл бұрын
Ivan Buck all the knowledge in the universe is there already just for us to find. Put there by God. I have found nothing in science that contradicts God except for naturalistic evolution. "Mother Nature" is as much a deity as any other other.
@IvanBuck
8 жыл бұрын
interesting
@snegelstenen
3 жыл бұрын
When it comes to the theory of evolution, we are completely dependent on what scientists have found. We as lay persons can't use the same research methods to confirm or falsify what they have found. So it's just another belief system for most of us really. Given the fact that I have a mind and I see and comprehend everything around me, I can't choose to believe in macro evolution.
Пікірлер: 22