Really sir, this is very helpful video for understanding the legal terms in easy way, I have been looking like this video but I couldn't find out. But now I have got such this video which I was looking for. I understand everything on your videos sir, your video is really helpful.. thanks a lot..... I want like this video more..👍👍👍👍
@suktarasorb1835
2 жыл бұрын
" Ultra vires " now easily can remember after relates with variant of "Corona vires" like ultra, bita,gamma 😂
@parushisharma6310
5 жыл бұрын
1.false as basic structure of constitution can not be amend 2. State 3.yes because they are considered to be of innocent mind
@swavnasahoo711
4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like Raftaar 🔥
@supriyaaggarwal7848
3 жыл бұрын
Seriously
@swavnasahoo711
3 жыл бұрын
@@supriyaaggarwal7848 🤓😊
@bhavishyabhardwaj8498
3 жыл бұрын
Indeed!!!
@vishalmaurya6498
3 жыл бұрын
So funny
@Prdip1111
3 жыл бұрын
He is
@ggbai4793
4 жыл бұрын
Please do make continue video about LEGAL TERM learning, here I learned a lot. Eagerly Waiting for your next legal term Video ..👍👍
@soumyajyoti9054
5 жыл бұрын
Ans 1. False, because Parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution. Ans 2. State becomes the owner of the ownerless goods. Ans 3. No
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@soumyajyoti9054
5 жыл бұрын
@@FoolsDenjunior Okay. Thank you 😊
@vupenta4500
4 жыл бұрын
@@FoolsDenjunior Ans-2 : Quasi contract
@youtubeofficeentertain...356
3 жыл бұрын
No2: government ,no 3,yes..
@Viewers_point
5 жыл бұрын
2nd or 3rd part kaha he video ka ??
@shaungorham1568
2 жыл бұрын
Cool, Mississppi.
@samradhmathur
5 жыл бұрын
Bala sir, good 🤘
@officialharshit825
4 жыл бұрын
Ans 1. True Ans 2. The person whoever find it Ans 3. Yes , this law apply the person of unsound mind .
@mathurtanishka9960
4 жыл бұрын
1. false as parliament cannot amend the basic structure of constitution
@footforwardeducation5803
3 жыл бұрын
No, parliament has no power to change the basic structure of the Constitution.....as said in KESHVANANDA BHARTI vs. UNION OF INDIA case
@mdnehalahmad2910
4 жыл бұрын
It's very helpful,👍Make some more videos in this topic please.
@LawyerinprogressSM
3 жыл бұрын
True 1st no
@saurabhshukla7406
3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@tanvisrivastava9465
3 жыл бұрын
Sir this video's is applicable for 3yr llb program..
@umangbhabar9658
2 жыл бұрын
Well it will be better to pronounce Di Li in correct way like doli incapax it should be pronounce dolaaye incapax,animus contrahendaai
@ShankarKumar-pr2dw
3 жыл бұрын
Ans.2 no, ownership is claimef over those goods. in such case the custodian goes to the gov
@sheelasridhar1987
4 жыл бұрын
Q1 - true Q2 - Q3 - applicable to adult with unsound mind
@Amma-sunkulamma
2 жыл бұрын
Ur preparing for llb sir
@Study_With_Me_official.
2 жыл бұрын
1. True
@bhavishyagaming4725
4 жыл бұрын
Which happening without intention is a amount to dolli but not count of audult
@AmanKumar-pu7fi
4 жыл бұрын
Link of other 2 video plz
@mehulpant5388
5 жыл бұрын
If no one claims to be the owner then probably it will be a commodity of the STATE.
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@youtubeofficeentertain...356
3 жыл бұрын
Can you make more videos about legal words?
@contemporaryvlogs9678
2 жыл бұрын
Make more videos regarding legal terms 🙏
@Proudhindusanatani108
3 жыл бұрын
Bala bala... Nice bala Sir
@ramakumaridubeycrn4524
4 жыл бұрын
The first who get that good is the owner of ownerless goods Bona vacantia
@mohamedabdulmajeed9769
4 жыл бұрын
Very useful/ with best wishes
@writeit123
4 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much Bala sir
@monipanday3531
3 жыл бұрын
1.false 2. 3.
@advyogeshpradhan
3 жыл бұрын
One suggestion from my side to you is please show us by using these Maxim's in sentences.
@Ghoshjit1011
2 жыл бұрын
Q)1()-false
@Raghav__Pandit
3 жыл бұрын
1st true
@aniruddha12345678
4 жыл бұрын
Where can I find Part 2 and Part 3 of this series?
@gurinderkaur9205
4 жыл бұрын
Where can I find part 2nd Nd 3 rd
@anujgajbhiye2312
2 жыл бұрын
Sir what's the mean of amicus testandi
@ramendra_tomar
5 жыл бұрын
Ans 2- Wohever finds it. Ans 3 - yes
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@roushnikumari3846
5 жыл бұрын
Sir blat pe video bnaye.....
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Sure
@GauravSingh-bl3wy
5 жыл бұрын
Plss upload 2nd video for legal term.. I m waiting guru ji
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Bus aane wala h
@ankitsah6097
5 жыл бұрын
1)It can be amend by article 368
@tejasjaiswal1
5 жыл бұрын
No article 368 permits to amend the constitution but doesn't permits to change its basic structure
@srijonmishra2207
4 жыл бұрын
Refer to Keshavananda Bharati v State of Kerala case. Court cannot change basic structure of constitution
@sureshboggula3350
3 жыл бұрын
In telugu commentary
@asgharniaz9808
3 жыл бұрын
Q1 - True Q2 - Government Q3- Yes
@upsccircle_
3 жыл бұрын
Q1- false
@LawyerinprogressSM
3 жыл бұрын
No ,2- answer to Government
@_ILB_ShubhamSingh
5 жыл бұрын
Ans 1 : true Ans2: state Ans3: no
@samradhmathur
5 жыл бұрын
Same
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@springspring73
4 жыл бұрын
@@FoolsDenjunior p
@Sourav-sy6yl
5 жыл бұрын
2. Yes
@Ram950
3 жыл бұрын
Good and useful
@thanksmahamanav1783
5 жыл бұрын
Q 3 yes
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@ShankarKumar-pr2dw
3 жыл бұрын
Ans.3 yes
@vallurimohansrinivas6026
3 жыл бұрын
Very well lectured sir🙏
@mehulpant5388
5 жыл бұрын
1 true.
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@kanaklatasingh7755
4 жыл бұрын
Can you share the link of other 2 videos..
@kavitasharma2712
4 жыл бұрын
Where is second part????
@uttrakhnd7365
2 жыл бұрын
sir can you provide me legal history link ?
@vrushaliwaghade8061
2 жыл бұрын
Sir baki do video ki link dekia plz
@shreyatripathi9856
4 жыл бұрын
Sir, Can amicus curiae be used for lawyers?
@arpitaprakash9460
4 жыл бұрын
Yes but as a third party
@user-oc1gr1so1z
Жыл бұрын
Actually court decides to appoint a person- expert in one's field or lawyer and organization as amicus curiae.
@adnanansari9500
3 жыл бұрын
1st- false( no one can change the basic structure of constitution)
@afshaanamanzoor7973
3 жыл бұрын
Wow!!
@maketradingsimple247
4 жыл бұрын
Sir when is coming next parts of legal terms and maxims
@nishantkumargiri7149
3 жыл бұрын
Q1 Ka Answer__false
@lawoneshouldknow
3 жыл бұрын
good work.
@advyogeshpradhan
3 жыл бұрын
These are not often used practically in litigation.
@user-oc1gr1so1z
Жыл бұрын
Yes, only half of the total legal terms explained in this video have practical uses.
@LawyerinprogressSM
3 жыл бұрын
3rd no...Yes..this unsound mind
@enjoyananda37
3 жыл бұрын
Slangs use legal?
@shubhamsayam9546
4 жыл бұрын
Where is second part man?
@irfanhanif3514
4 жыл бұрын
brother your example is wrong for de jure and de facto
@sakshimaurya6770
4 жыл бұрын
Is this lecture available for Maharashtra clet
@riyaavallecha5905
2 жыл бұрын
Not getting part 2
@shreyagupta6045
3 жыл бұрын
Q.1, False
@shubhamKumar-xg2mu
5 жыл бұрын
I think government can keep the property _ 2 and
@TeghiyaGhulam
4 жыл бұрын
Sir next video kahan h?
@vandanarana3853
5 жыл бұрын
Ans1 No, it can't amend the constitution
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
It can amend the constitution but not the basic structure of the cost.
@sheelasridhar1987
4 жыл бұрын
Q2 - state
@mehulpant5388
5 жыл бұрын
3 shaayad use Kar sakte hai.
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@thug_life1218
4 жыл бұрын
Where is the second part sir?
@mahimaraghav9548
3 жыл бұрын
Government
@furqanhaider706
3 жыл бұрын
first second and third degree of murder smjhaday please
@LawyerinprogressSM
3 жыл бұрын
Hello sir
@letsgo5933
4 жыл бұрын
1.true
@pauljosef2282
4 жыл бұрын
The answer of question 2 is cop
@mksharma31
5 жыл бұрын
Q3 yes
@sahinanai2292
3 жыл бұрын
Q1false
@vickykumar1517
5 жыл бұрын
1 true
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@ramendra_tomar
5 жыл бұрын
Ans 1- False
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@lalitbhushansinha7162
5 жыл бұрын
1.false
@thanksmahamanav1783
5 жыл бұрын
Q.1 false
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@radhikagupta4863
5 жыл бұрын
1- F
@realorainecruz4643
3 жыл бұрын
Which country is this information intended for?
@Mohan_Gyan
3 жыл бұрын
India
@vickykumar1517
5 жыл бұрын
3 no
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@Hostell-r7h
3 жыл бұрын
Que 1 true
@harshitverma2675
5 жыл бұрын
Raftaar bolra h kya like thoko
@akthesniper4384
3 жыл бұрын
Not virus , vires
@niteshchaurasiya6596
4 жыл бұрын
State
@baljeetsingh3904
4 жыл бұрын
👍👍💕💕
@swarak8617
4 жыл бұрын
Answer 1 : false
@riyaneetamishra3381
3 жыл бұрын
1 question false
@nandakumarp9179
4 жыл бұрын
👨🏻🌾💃🏿👨🏻🌾 LIVING IN TODAY'S COMPLEX WORLD DEMANDS SOME EXPOSURE TO LEGAL SYSTEMS , JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS...💃🏿🏇💃🏿 IT CAN ALSO MAKE YOU MORE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SOCIETY AND FRIENDS CIRCLE, AS AN INFORMATIONAL LEADER 🙊👨🏻🌾🙊[[ NANDAKUMAR DEVELOPMENT OFFICER LIC KALOOR ]]
@coolandgood1010
4 жыл бұрын
WHY ARE SO MANY INDIANS UPLOADING LAW VIDEOS??!!?!
@himanshukhokamnegi8156
5 жыл бұрын
Can you please give the correct answers of the question?_😃
@FoolsDenjunior
5 жыл бұрын
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@MrAnkur11Garg
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@VandanaYadav-ud2hr
4 жыл бұрын
2q govt
@sidheshpatil7120
4 жыл бұрын
Animus Bhendi = Intention to cook okra curry for meal!
@sunithavarada193
3 жыл бұрын
ITS NOT ULTRA VIRUS ITS ULTRA VIRES .PLZ CHECK PRONUNCIATION
@dimplegupta2267
3 жыл бұрын
Answer is false, because the parliament has no power to amend the basic structure of the constitution.
Пікірлер: 154