I started in 7th. I remember the psicic phase: Rolling dice to know how many dice you are allowed to roll to roll then if you can roll dice.
@szczepanfiefiorka2107
2 ай бұрын
truly a cosmic horror of a rule -you get random amount of dice which your psykers can use for their powers how could 40k players ever comprehend it
@jamesespinosa690
2 ай бұрын
Cool right?? I don't understand why they though removing such an important phase was a good idea.
@joebyrnes9254
2 ай бұрын
@@szczepanfiefiorka2107I started on seventh and looking back on it, seventh edition rules were what drove me away from the hobby. They were either too much or too overpowered.
@ImperialDiecast
Ай бұрын
@@szczepanfiefiorka2107 you got a basic amount of dice equal to the mastery levels of all your psykers added up, and then a bonus amount of dice equal to a D6 roll. so if you rolled a 4 and had a single mastery level 2 psyker in your army, you got 6 dice for that turn. your opponent would get 4 dice to attempt to negate your castings during your turn. then, any psyker of yours could cast any 1 charge level (some powerful spells required 2 charge or even 3 charge) of any psychic power he had rolled for in the beginning of the game on a roll of a 4+, and you could choose how many dice you would take from the pool to increase your cast chance. your opponent would then usually roll all his 4 dice to try and counter it, and any roll of a 6 negated one of your 4+ rolled dice.
@cristhianmlr
24 күн бұрын
*psychic
@edwardmorrissette5817
2 ай бұрын
Genuinely psychopathic that you just grabbed a cup of vodka like that
@daeamiralis
2 ай бұрын
I love the older editions, 5th and 7th in particular, but I think early 9th edition was probably the most stable framework we had before they fucked it all up again. 10th just has nothing going on
@vsGoliath96
2 ай бұрын
Yes, 7th edition was an absolute clusterfuck... It is still, by far, my favorite edition. Please Games Workshop, I don't ask for a lot, but I beg of you to bring back my beloved randomly scattering blast templates!
@dumbcow1
2 ай бұрын
Ah, nothing like firing a vindicator cannon dangerous close, and having it blow onto your squad. Them were the days. I miss scatter. Oh, your deepstriking unit of terminators? Yeah...they are now inside the buildings wall...they are dead. 🤣
@vsGoliath96
2 ай бұрын
@@dumbcow1 Oh man, how I loved the Vindicator! I got damn good use out of that thing combined with Blood Angels Engines of Baal upgrade. 15 points for full movement and firing the main cannon for a Strength 10 large blast template? Yes please! That was the thing I think I always loved about 7th edition. It was horribly balanced and nonsensical, but my god it was endlessly entertaining. I think my perfect 40k would be a combination of the streamlined rules of 10th edition and a bit of the chaos and army list building of 6th or 7th edition.
@Deathgazeroo
2 ай бұрын
You can always try Horus Heresy. It’s based on 7th rules and it’s great - my favourite wargame
@Lycurgus1982
2 ай бұрын
For that, I'd give you two likes if I could.
@Kattbirb
2 ай бұрын
Sharing Pie with your friends was a good time, but after I read Codex: Cityfight, I knew it wasn't the future.
@ADhammer
2 ай бұрын
I started in 3rd edition, 7th edition was indeed dark times.
@passchen-fail3704
2 ай бұрын
7th edition formations were basically just first edition Sigmar, where whoever had the best beard automatically won the combat with one unit and another automatically won if it was raining out. I’m not joking, Sigmar burnt so many bridges and I hated fantasy.
@ce4879
2 ай бұрын
Nah you’re joking because that’s exaggerated as heck. Those rpg joke rules were mostly for special characters and doing them only gave you extra re-rolls. And the “raining outside” one isn’t even AoS, that was the Wfb 7th edition narrative Kislev spells that used the actual weather outside to determine what spells you used. Yes, they used those joke rules for Fantasy for a long time. AoS was just the first time they put them right on the unit stats instead of hidden away on their online/WD narrative rules like how the 7th ED Bret tourney gave you extra points for actually shouting out Monty Python quotes.
@dumbcow1
2 ай бұрын
I absolutely LOVED the complexity of 7th. I found its gotten far too simple. I HATE the list building in 10th, but the mechanics...aren't bad. I can deal with how simplified the gameplay has become, if they bring back proper list building. Its absurd asking someone to bring 2k points...and everyone is like... I can make 1990....or 2015... and its that you can only get close, because there is no way to really move 10 or 15 points around anymore. Weapons aren't a choice, upgrades aren't a choice.
@vanja12398
2 ай бұрын
Actualy just finished a game of 2k points My list is exactly 2k can show it if u need any proofs
@dumbcow1
2 ай бұрын
@vanja12398 see if that holds true in a week with the balance dataslate. I'm not saying it's impossible, but it's quite difficult with the current list building system. You don't have levers to pull to move 5, 10, or 15pt increments. Only thing you can move are Enhancements.
@Motard.Actual
2 ай бұрын
Agreed
@garbagecan755
2 ай бұрын
I'll be honest, 10th kind of just feels like balanced 7th. It feels like all the Detachments are exactly the same as Formations from 7th. You have 1 that's good and you have to take it and you have to take the units it pumps and that's what your entire faction is based around for the rest of the edition. That and the removal of points for wargear... I unironically think I had more "fun" in 7th even when it was an objectively worse game.
@FenrirFrostborn
2 ай бұрын
better it had died, then to live on to be what it has become.
@hobbsfamily4232
2 ай бұрын
I still have 15 wyrdvane psykers from my Guard deamon summoning detachment. Nothing turns a 500pt game in your favor like a couple of bloodthirsters.
@ImperialDiecast
Ай бұрын
7th was written to supposedly stop 6th edition's taudar (eldar farseers making fire warriors reroll failed hits) and skimmers with constant 4+ cover saves even in the open if they moved due to jink not affecting your shooting, but broke so many more things fluffwise (everyone except grey knights, even eldar could summon demons if they wanted to) and allowed for so much cheese, in that force org didnt even matter anymore (hooray unbound armies) or invisible librarian + grav centurion deathstars teleporting all over the place, or just a guy bringing 3 supplement books saying he has 4 formations in his army and taking 5 mins to explain what they do. we even had formations within formations (like tyranid units in shield of baal getting a bonus special rule for being equipped a certain way, and then that unit and some other ones banding together to become a formation) But if you built balanced lists and werent a powergamer, then 7th was fine. It really only ruined the tourney scene and punished competitive players by giving them a million ways to be even more competitive.
@Lord_Aussem
2 ай бұрын
7th got cleaned up with Horus Heresy and HH 2.0 especially. If they used those rules, keep away from allies, D weapons, supplements, formations and stratagems, streamline the psychic power mechanics, and clean up a couple USR’s here and there, you’d have a great edition I think. 10th just isn’t appealing to me at all, and HH2.0 is the only thing I play right now. I want to introduce xenos armies to HH2.0, in the name of the Great Crusade. There were good fan rules last edition from Aus30k, I don’t think it would be too hard to adapt.
@ColonelBobfed
2 ай бұрын
Worth mentioning the Panoptica Team's fan made rules expansions, added (& returned) units, and extensive errata. I ended up spending 8 hours one day compiling rules across 7 different PDFs, but that was worth it for how good HH2.0 is to play.
@Lycurgus1982
2 ай бұрын
Yeah, it was a sh!t show in terms of balance, but it was fun when you consider all of the possibilities with list building, coupled with a friendly, sportsmen player base. Especially when the games were lore driven. Where I gamed all the players knew what an abusive list looked like and you could build something that was relatively fare while still playing with your new toy soldiers. I personally liked it. It had endless creative possibilities.
@DominatorLegend
2 ай бұрын
This has to be the only time I've ever heard someone say 8th is the best edition ever released 😂 It's usually a toss-up between 2nd and 3rd, with 4th and 5th sometimes being part of the debate.
@ImperialDiecast
Ай бұрын
6th was 7th without all the supplements and formations
@johnkemper6335
2 ай бұрын
Great trip down memory lane. I miss paying points for wargear too.
@LifeofSquidMann
2 ай бұрын
How did GW go from a rock solid foundation like 3rd Edition... To an incoherent mess like 7th? Nowadays 40k is more like a pseudo TCG instead of a proper wargame because of it.
@nawrden4721
2 ай бұрын
working cool things into the system and how they interact.
@francoismarion-eu3jq
2 ай бұрын
Oh 3e-5e were horrible! 7e was a saving grace.
@jamesespinosa690
2 ай бұрын
It wasn't an "incoherent mess". Please stop huffing farts. 7th had a LOT of content. And some really really poorly balanced formations. Apart from that, it was the best edition of 40k ever.
@Kattbirb
2 ай бұрын
Feature creep. Every edition past 3rd had to add *something*, otherwise there wouldn't have been many reasons to keep buying the books.
@francoismarion-eu3jq
2 ай бұрын
@@Kattbirb as someone whos played every edition, youre wrong, its the exact opposite. They are constantly trying to dumb it down to reduce the learning curve making the game more accessible to idiots, children, and women. Math? Yeah that doesnt exist in warhammer anymore...
@pauljablonski5746
2 ай бұрын
I brought a friend to our club. He faced a guy with a necron reclamation legion for his 1st game. I think every necron could get back up on a re rollable 4plus. My friend Neva played again
@Perkustin
2 ай бұрын
Great Video, i think there's enough material from your tournament experience and in depth knowledge of 7th to make other videos about it. I was only painting the odd model for the best part of the 6-9th decade so missed out on it. Given that Heresy uses the same core system it's crazy to contrast what's an outlier in that game now to what you could do in 40k by the sounds of it.
@ZerberusKnight
2 ай бұрын
The problem with 7th was how nutty the formations got. Some were good... Some got a bit wild. It's a shame, cause the game itself functioned so much better. Hell, it actually had some fun and character to it! Shokk Attak baey-beeee!! But then we got 9th... And now we've got chess edition where my orks are just guard that can't shoot, wolves or white scars have to use the chaos codex to be played not as ultramarines... Etc.
@acidnine3692
2 ай бұрын
HH's 1st edition goes a long way to removing some of the jank. Force org charts instead of formations, Tweaked psychic powers, better army rules / chapter tactics... I had hope in 7th ed that GW was going to force org charts for armies, but then they made the abomination that is nested formations and armies and it went downhill from there. I do suggest to play 7th edition using HH1's age of darkness book. It should work with any 7th ed book out there, even if you don't break the rules with formations. God Rest Alan Bligh's soul.
@greenghost2008
2 ай бұрын
It was so bad 40k players starting to mass joining other games. Many have never come back. Most of the Malifaux group in my area are people who left and refuse to play warhammer again.
@wyatttyson7737
Ай бұрын
I started with 9th edition, hearing horror stories about 7th edition from longbeards. I didn’t believe them for a long time, then I started to actually read the rules and lists for myself. I didn’t complain about 9th *at all* after that.
@GearShotgun
2 ай бұрын
I remember when the rules for moving terrain with psychic powers came out. As soon as that happened I knew we were about to get a new edition. It was too crazy to be anything but them trying to milk a little bit more out of us before the rules changed.
@toybot99
2 ай бұрын
10th edition to 7th edition: Hold my beer…
@forthebrave6122
2 ай бұрын
i feel like 11th is trying to copy homework
@simonrousseau9760
2 ай бұрын
7th was my favorite edition before the arrival of the decurion formation.
@Deadjim17
7 күн бұрын
I definitely have rose coloured glasses... I started the hobby in 3rd ed but I came back during 7th ed and I love and miss its complexity especially scattering, vehicle Weapon arcs and armour facings, just getting rid of this has removed so much tactical movement. I love how Heresy has adapted a lot of it, with a soft touch improvements, and preffer it over 10th ed.
@rod.h8064
2 ай бұрын
HH v2 is probably like 40k 7.5, far as I know there's no formations, all upgrades use points, and each legion has special rules
@seanuh60
2 ай бұрын
I enjoyed the formations allowing you to take wired army unit combos. But like all editions special rules are the pitfall. Just get rid of special rules.
@marcarthur100
2 ай бұрын
i miss 7th ed it wus so much fun
@jaegerbomb269
2 ай бұрын
I didn't jump in until 8th edition and Horus Heresy 2.0. You may judge me, I like the upscaled MK6 and Taticool Phobos Marines. 😅
@jsalbano
11 күн бұрын
yeah, but at least the space marine line hadn't been gutted and replaced in those days. I find myself longing for 7th. I'd prefer 4th by far, but shoot, give me back those great old models. Give me some crunch in my main rules, and templates and scatter dice. No more tracking 300,000 wounds because everything has too many.
@WWCephas
2 ай бұрын
Don't forget the Dark Angels formation with full BS overwatch (unlimited usage)
@MultiTequilaSunrise
2 ай бұрын
Those were glorious days. Brother Asmodai will help you to see.
@raphie8488
2 ай бұрын
Funny then that Horus Heresy is also 7th edition rules, just a bit more polished (but it still needs some/lots of work). I think the ultra competitive rules that have now grown into 10th edition is even worse. Edit: I started in 1994 with 2nd edition.
@Motard.Actual
2 ай бұрын
I loved 7th is was my favorite, and I mean that. It’s when I started playing.
@GrimSqueaker
2 ай бұрын
Deamon Prince Flying circus was my jam back then. Fateweaver, 3 300 point Deamon Princes and then Horrors and Nurgljngs - it was brilliant
@saythingstv5116
2 ай бұрын
What a trip down memory lane that was!! 😂
@tyranifex01
2 ай бұрын
Ah yes, the edition of the Daemon summoners, the best edition (or at least my favourite). I think i finished more games in that edition with more points than i started with, rather than the other way around due to the absolutely busted Daemonology powers.
@Badbufon
Ай бұрын
this sounds like the Median XL of warhammer 40k lol
@Count_leche
2 ай бұрын
I started playing in the middle of 6th and 7th was the edition I really started to better at the game…..I have a soft for the those days….i think played crimson first galdius
@ChrisNihilus
2 ай бұрын
You absolutely could run the same formation twice, just most gaming groups and tournaments would limit that. Also, you should have talked about the most evil of all formations, the Skyhammer. That was absolutely insane.
@theoryhammernerds
2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the reminder! I could not remember, but sometime was telling me you technically could.
@ChrisNihilus
2 ай бұрын
Absolutely! For some reason people forget these things but I don't. This formation came with a bundle of droppods, assault marines and devastators on the site. It required 2 of both. The entire formation had to deploy in reserve, but when they deepstriked (no roll required, they just came automatically), the devastator could fire without penalties (at the time, heavy weapon hit on 6+ after moving), and the assault could charge (which was insane at the time, charging after coming from reserve wasn't a thing). Then, your devastator could fire and if they hit your opponent roll a morale test on 3d6 (again, insane) and if they fail, they have to go to ground (basically losing a turn). If they pass it for some miracle, you still couldn't overwatch (it wasn't a stratagem at the time, just something everybody could do). Then if your assault charged a unit that was on the ground, they could reroll to hit and to wounds (which is common now but almost unheard of at thte time). Now, the thing is that devastator squads didn't have to take any weapon. You could just put them as 5 tacticals with bolters, call them devastators and they could just basically deactivate 2 units in your army when they came down, plus all the other insane bonuses. Or you could drop 8 gravcannons in the face of the enemy, which at the time countered everything. This is on top the fact that droppods were the meta, so those weren't even a tax. Cheap af, able to control objective, completely shut down enemy movement (a FAQ confirmed the doors were part of the model and so, not walkable on, so they had a massive foot in game), difficult to remove even with antivehicle weapons. I've seen people dropping 12 and forcing people to stay in your own deployment zone and unable to score.
@passchen-fail3704
2 ай бұрын
I got in in late 4th edition. In my opinion, 5th edition was best. 7th was just awful. 8th was a necessary revival of the game, 9th gave me migraines after every game, and 10 is, in my opinion, just kinda lackluster and the armies have much less personality.
@elbloncomagnifico
2 ай бұрын
7th ed was a bad edition. But i'd rather play the hell outta 7th ed rules then play another game of 10th.
@chrisj9628
Ай бұрын
I started in 4th and my god 7th was a mess. 10th is so much better than the 6th/7th mess.
@ecth97
2 ай бұрын
First time watcher, this video was great and earned a subscribe from me. I was out of the game during 7th Ed cause I couldn’t afford it, and whenever I learn more about 7th Ed rules I have to wonder if the players were just making up their formation rules off the top of their head cause they could get away with it
@theoryhammernerds
2 ай бұрын
I would say you missed out, but you didn't haha. Thanks for the sub!!
@nathanielbugg7355
Ай бұрын
Ce? 7th was a great a edition, changing the weapon profiles, so that armour penetration in combat actually made sense! Removing vehicle armour profiles, because a carnifex could tank multiple shots from a shadowsword but a Landraider could be oneshot! The multiple psychic disciplines (daemonolgy being a personal fav) and who can forget getting rid of the 1hq to 2troops rule, f***ing inspired. All in all this is a gross realisation of a good edition, if you want pants, just look at 5th edition, nothing happened?! In fact they got rid of Combat patrol, which was and in many ways still is the best way to play a game of warhammer. edit: admittedly I did stop playing around 7th edition.. huh
@rossdiggle
2 ай бұрын
7th was good for hours heresy. That's because the rules were better balanced in that
@icemanfool
2 ай бұрын
Nice video and i like the DoW video on screen 👍
@justususalplayer1329
2 ай бұрын
I'm only on the 27th minute of this viedo and I'm still hoping you'll tell about absolutely the worst one - blob of tzeench fishes with 2++ rerollable save acompanied by hundred or so brimstones for enough warpcharges
@leftistadvocate9718
2 ай бұрын
i still think that 7th edition psychic phase is the best edition of the psychic phase out of all the warhammer editions. the strategy of having to gamble how many warp charges you want to spend was great. you could guarantee the psychic power works at the guarantee of your psyker fucking exploding if you wanted. but it also meant that thousand sons and grey knights fucking smashed everyone else during the psychic phase. tyranids also never got a 7th edition codex so shadow in the warp could even counter them which fluff wise they should've.
@ImperialDiecast
Ай бұрын
tyranids did get one in the form of all the new units they got in the shield of baal campaign books (toxicrene, malanthrope, tyrannocyte drop pod, mucolid spore, sporocyts, and some formations) which is more new units than most armies would get added to their roster when a new codex came out for them. the only thing nids didnt get in 7th was a rebalancing of points costs.
@leftistadvocate9718
Ай бұрын
@@ImperialDiecast 7th edition tyrandis didn't get an update to shadow in the warp. they were using 6th edition shadow int he warp mechanics in a 7th edition psychic phase. it was like trying to put a square peg in a round hole. sure they got new units but one their core mechanics just didn't exist in 7th edition because it never got updated.
@ImperialDiecast
Ай бұрын
@@leftistadvocate9718 true, it never got errata'd. something as simple as manifesting on 5s rather than 4s if within range could have worked, even if only as a houserule.
@jiveturky3000
2 ай бұрын
7th was a great edition, if everything is OP nothing is. invis was lame tho
@HAMMERSMASHD
2 ай бұрын
Interesting perspective. I didn't start 40k until 9th but was in Gw stores around the end of 7th... That edition sounds like a dumpster fire. I could see how it would be fun as a higher level competitive player, but an unfun time for new people, the rule of cool, or "play the models you own" players
@ImperialDiecast
Ай бұрын
opposite. it was fun for new players who played against other new players, but nightmare for competitive players who had to run with the most cheesy lists to stand a chance in tourneys.
@warhammer1009
2 ай бұрын
I would prefer to play 7th Without Formation over playing 10th
@jameskurth3560
2 ай бұрын
I agree 100%. Excluding formations it was good. And I was playing with the 6th edition corsair codex that didn't have formations.
@Trowarr
2 ай бұрын
As a CSM player it was the 4th edition that made me drop WH40K until the 8th edition. The CSM 4th codex was AWFUL.
@David-li4uw
2 ай бұрын
7th edition sucked but 10th is trying to pass it up
@arkslippyjunior7773
2 ай бұрын
Yknow what's funny, the Admech army ignoring the librarians probably doesn't even nearly hit 1500 points
@dancallan7907
2 ай бұрын
"Worst" is subjective. If you were a Tau or Eldar player 7th was a good time😅
@ImperialDiecast
Ай бұрын
6th was better for tau and eldar since they could ally as battle brothers and have farseers bless every BS3 tau unit.
@fuckgoogle4538
2 ай бұрын
How is GW a monopoly?
@zhufortheimpaler4041
2 ай бұрын
7th was the point where 40 went downhill and into a gameplay tailspin. 40k didnt really recover till today. 5th and 6th were pushing the 3rd ed ruleset to its limits and already overstraining it, 7th..... 3rd/4th ed games were quick, easy, no special rule avalance, formations, stratagems etc in the game. you didnt roll 105 dice for a 35 ork shoota mob to hit. the amount of dice you rolled were ALOT more limited (just like in 6th and 7th warhammer fantasy) wich resulted in a much faster gameplay, shorter turns etc. GW really needs to do a core shift in their ruleset, as the "My Turn, your Turn" system is incredibly dated and they try to patch up and cover up the 1990´s core ruleset with fancy new special rules, detachements, stratagems and other shit.
@Ashalza
2 ай бұрын
OPR being a better game than 10th is what killed 40k at my LGS.
@gordoncree2899
2 ай бұрын
I'm surprised, no mention of the iron chapter master with a 1+ fnp, 2+, 2++ rerollable, on a bike..
@theoryhammernerds
2 ай бұрын
I forgot about that hahahahahahahahaaaaaaa
@Lord_Aussem
2 ай бұрын
Chapter Master Smash F*cker I believe he was called. He had the gorgons chain which gave him a bunch of rules buffs
@ThroatSore
2 ай бұрын
They mucking bout at the moment?
@christopheraaron1255
2 ай бұрын
I love 7th ed. I really don't see what the problem was.
@AllHailDiskordia
2 ай бұрын
I got out of the game with 6th edition
@user-ir6gb9xh7r
2 ай бұрын
I remember quitting that edition, I restarted in 10th and love it
@That2J
Ай бұрын
“Thank god for 8th edition” is never the point you want to be making, it invalidates your opinion in the eyes of hobbyists over the age of 16
@kenupton4084
2 ай бұрын
6th was worse. I came back to 7th after only playing a few matches in 6th. Eldar Wave Serpents and scatter bikes.
@iambenk
2 ай бұрын
I am not sure about the Codexs in 6th, but I really liked the core rules.
@jameskurth3560
2 ай бұрын
@@iambenkThey were really good.
@DownUnderWarboss
2 ай бұрын
Amazon said: " hold my beer, D.E.I can finish off the job".
@lotharlights
2 ай бұрын
10th is so boring though. I remember after 7th Games Workshop claiming they'll never lie again and then went straight back to overbalancing, bias and lying again.
@jacobwilbers9852
2 ай бұрын
30k does have formations and they are nowhere near as op. 30k boils down to get as many termies and dreads on the table as you can everything else is garbage.
@nunyabusiness7001
2 ай бұрын
7th edition ruleset is the best ruleset bar none everything after is trash, imagine not having blast templates hahaha Just ban formations simple as The only thing it didn't have but we changed that was hitting on 2s absolutely annoyed the sh it outta me you could be WS 10 VS WS 2 and it's still 3s?! Re tarded with a capital R Hours heresy Age at least fixed that finally Anyway 10th is still trash no blast template and wiping entire units because large strength weapon and no saves nar I'll stay in the past
@nunyabusiness7001
2 ай бұрын
O and daemons (or anything deep striking) not being able to assault on entry....so dumb, again fixed now HH2 But the ruleset themselves 7th was and is the best
@nunyabusiness7001
2 ай бұрын
You guys are just cheesers like most "competitive" players hahaha Changing armies to suit whatever is min maxxed
@passchen-fail3704
2 ай бұрын
Tell me you’ve never played fifth without telling me you’ve never played fifth. Are you trolling or is that your actual opinion. Youre allowed to have it, even if its wrong.
@nunyabusiness7001
2 ай бұрын
Nope. Started in fifth but nice try
@francoismarion-eu3jq
2 ай бұрын
@@passchen-fail3704ive been playing since the start of 2e. 2e was the best edition followed by 7e. 3-5 were worse than 8-10, and 10 is horrible shit made for ages 10+
@djc1376
2 ай бұрын
9th was way better just for combos and stuff ya could pull off in game everything is now weaker and powers are weaker just meh now unless ya playing eldar which have good powers and combos and it feels like a good game when ya flying around killing stuff not fun for other player who's army is meh
@jamesespinosa690
2 ай бұрын
7th wasn't dumb. And people weren't "leaving the game in droves". It was possibly the most popular edition ever.
@alessiogiuffrida6172
2 ай бұрын
Yes, so popular that i didn't saw anyone playing it; so popular that Privateer Press has started to spread WarmaHordes in Europe and stealing GW's customers. So popular that when 8th edition cames out i saw plenty of people getting back play 40k and saying "finally a good edition".
@t.h.2906
2 ай бұрын
I had the screamer star army it was lolz.
@theoryhammernerds
2 ай бұрын
My best defense against that was that you failed your grimoire roll XD
@francoismarion-eu3jq
2 ай бұрын
7e is the best after 2e. What your brain too small for 7e? Must be since they keep dumbing down the game...
Пікірлер: 124