The main reason why I got a CCW, was that I use and visit Public lands and I’m away from responding local law enforcement in a timely manner. This portion of the law makes these areas another soft area for danger. 🤬
@FreeBayArea
25 күн бұрын
If im not mistaken you can carry anything when inside any national forrest. State forrest I'm not sure
@carlos1750777
25 күн бұрын
Exactly , that's why I got mine .
@williamhale6794
25 күн бұрын
What good is it to have RIGHT to have a gun if you cannot carry it or have bullets in it?
@F15ElectricEagle
25 күн бұрын
Your question is valid. However, it is based on the premise that the people have the right to be armed. The gun control side doesn't believe the people have such a right.
@user-im6fy4qp6m
25 күн бұрын
dont care what they say and never obeying or complying. the 2A gives me the right to carry wherever i want.
@ITellYouWhut
25 күн бұрын
Preach
@paulgithens635
25 күн бұрын
The 9th Circuit Court is like the bum that drops a load 10 feet from the public toilet and calls it close enough.
@robkeller3431
25 күн бұрын
What about regular parks? Lots of homeless and criminals hang around.
@Aging2day
25 күн бұрын
They are protected by Gavin Newsom!
@SandCrabNews
25 күн бұрын
4:28 1A and 2A ... I can understand that a Voter Registration makes sense so that Election Materials can be mailed to me. I don't understand why a Firearm Permit is required because I can carry my CAMERAS, Knives and Stun Gun openly or concealed without a permit. I also don't understand CCW permitting that requires citizens, who are not government employees to go through training, range time, and other hurdles. Government may impose hurdles for their employees to jump, but have no constitutional powers to require a U.S. CITIZEN to perform in order to carry a gun, vote, carry a camera, collect petition signatures, practice religion, etc.
@chendo650
25 күн бұрын
You make a good point
@henryptung
25 күн бұрын
> I can understand that a Voter Registration makes sense so that Election Materials can be mailed to me. Not a good argument. Voting requires no "election materials" - all it requires is you walking up to a polling place and filling out a ballot. Mail-in voting is an optimization of the process, not a requirement.
@zalalapant
24 күн бұрын
No firearms for protective details of politicians and judges in California
@carlos1750777
25 күн бұрын
For 100 yes ccw people could go to most places. Now, the 9th says no ccw can go to :wilderness parks, museums, zoos, etc. Maybe we need to litigate this to a final decision,then take it to SCOTUS.
@hitekcountry
25 күн бұрын
Parks and State Parks? - What about bike trails and jogging trails that can go for miles and miles and not uncommon there will be homeless people along those trails. Are those included in the restricted places?
@mkyfinn73
25 күн бұрын
Yeah Homeless people are the big danger out there.
@calesmith3673
24 күн бұрын
Very informative. Thank you
@jamesbills5998
25 күн бұрын
How can there be any " losses" when the Supreme Court was very clear In their decision ?
@user-im6fy4qp6m
25 күн бұрын
how can biden be president when Trump won the election? oh because you and everyone else rolls over to allow it.
@davidmerrell1163
25 күн бұрын
Bonta and Newsom and the 9th have no respect for the SC or the constitution. They have clearly displayed that over and over.
@SC-td1tg
25 күн бұрын
Todays parks are dangerous.... Homeless, gangs, drugs and so forth. But state parks are a huge blow as that really hinders outdoor activity as you know criminals have no respect for the law so this only hurts law abiding CCW folks... Not to mention that won't be able to take kiddo over to the playground, even though all these sketchy people can be there.
@Triste916
25 күн бұрын
Anyone that values the second amendment, freedom, and the American dream needs to register to vote and vote this November. I watched a video on a 2A friendly channel that suggested that most gun owners are not registered to vote and don't vote because thay think their vote won't count. It also suggested that if just 2% of those people registered to vote and voted it would make a huge difference at the polls especially in swing states. If you are not registered to vote and not voting for presidents and politicians that support the second amendment then don't complain when our rights are infringed upon. Get out and vote this November and encourage your freinds and family to do the same. I beleive this election is one of the most important elections in history. We need to do the right thing for the sake of future generations to come. 🇺🇸❤️💪
@user-im6fy4qp6m
25 күн бұрын
yeah keep voting for one of the 2 parties that are on the same team to dismantle your personal rights and usher in the great reset. that will get your rights back.
@zmbombr
23 күн бұрын
I vote but am extremely cynical about the system and thise in control of counting the votes. There is no reason voting machines need to have secret proprietary software ....these machines are very nefarious and not to be trusted....tons of voter fraud available with no id and mail in ballots. In 2020 there were 133 million registered voters nationwide. Supposedly 74 million for Trump, 81 million for Brandon...What kinda math is that????
@texture6
25 күн бұрын
Exempt and Shall Not be Infringed. What’s the difference. The Police (State) vs The People. are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
@akiostewart
25 күн бұрын
I think keeping it in the car is almost more of a danger because there's always a chance that the car will get stolen.
@SC-td1tg
25 күн бұрын
And nobody goes after all the people that break into cars.... So much safer to carry on person than leaving in car hands down.... No debate about it!
@TUMARK2
25 күн бұрын
historically, prior to 2016 and sb707 california ccw was legal on school campus, I could legally carry on my son's high school campus and on local college campus also.
@williamyoung5001
25 күн бұрын
Criminals don’t follow any rules or regulations!!
@zmbombr
23 күн бұрын
When tyranny becomes law, freedom requires being an outlaw 😮
@LouisFrankel-hy5qm
24 күн бұрын
Had to hit the Like four times before it would register. I've seen this on several pro 2A sites.
@IEraiderfan
25 күн бұрын
A mixed bag for sure thank you guys stay safe.
@ITellYouWhut
25 күн бұрын
We have a duty to not follow unjust laws
@kevos823
25 күн бұрын
Any talks of CRPA mounting a case against the CA universal background checks & registry?
@4damula
25 күн бұрын
14 months later, im still waiting for them to process my ccw application in Alameda County.
@chendo650
24 күн бұрын
In Alameda County? My friend, you do realize that HOME owners are charged for legally defending themselves INSIDE their own home in Alameda? I would have suggested you just send the money on a retainer with a great self defense attorney. Sf and Alameda are probably some of the worst places to apply for a ccw in the state.
@4damula
24 күн бұрын
@chendo650 California has a castle doctrine. My neighbor killed a man attempting to enter his back door with a gun, and he's not in jail.
@chendo650
24 күн бұрын
@@4damula I understand that but with that criminal of a da running wild charges rampant, I wouldn't think a ccw would be your biggest concern. It's my understanding that by default, in major metropolitan areas like the bay, they take your ccw while under pending investigation and suspend or revoke your license to carry anyway. Atleast 3 people I personally know in sf, Oakland, and Fremont have all had that happen to them. All of of them eventually had their charges dropped and their license restored.
@4damula
24 күн бұрын
@@chendo650 sounds like it was worth then. Especially since they got their rights restored.
@chendo650
24 күн бұрын
@@4damula it might have been, I won't deny or doubt that. But one of those 3 people I know was under investigation for about 8 months and 2 of his accepted carries couldnt be legally carried in lieu of his confiscated weapon. By the fact that you've been waiting longer than a year, and god forbid you had to use it, you'd be spending almost the same time without it. I'm not arguing against following the law, but it seems that it would be futile. Some retainable lawyers like Attorneys on retainer (just for example, not a recommendation) will cover you regardless of invalid or non existent licenses to carry. Its just wild to think about spending +1000$, waiting over 6 months, and still having your firearm taken and your license revoked or suspended lest you use it. My question for you is, how involved are you at helping change those ridiculous laws ? I can tell you I'm not as involved as I'd like to be...but then again I live in a different county. It seems we just keep getting people to comply with these nonsensical terms and conditions and the more people do, the less chance there is to get a complete make over.
@rhekman
25 күн бұрын
The Bruen decision mentioned courthouses, polling places, and legislative assemblies as locations traditionally restricting bearing of arms at the time of the founding. What they have in common - controlled access, specific hours of operation, and provided security. Those same criteria should be used to limit what areas can be "sensitive places" in modern times.
@user-im6fy4qp6m
25 күн бұрын
no. your rights to carry and own guns must be restricted and taken away. this way you have to comply with all dictates from the government and you have no threat of force to object to tyrannical actions. this is important for the protection of our democracy.
@marcofguzman3075
25 күн бұрын
Absolutely Correct
@Cho-denki-rabbit
25 күн бұрын
Ignorant, unwilling to learn, tyrannical judiciary...
@FreeBayArea
25 күн бұрын
I heard the psychology evaluation in my county (bay area) is 500 dollars. It was 150 just a couple months ago.
@chendo650
25 күн бұрын
The redundancy of passing a background check (4473) that asks questions of the specific nature pertaining to a psychological evaluation and verifies your answer before you even purchase the firearm, to only be forced to undergo an additional evaluation of mental stability is ridiculous. Obviously they couldn't sell you the firearm if you failed either the background check or the verification process for screening of previous mental health illness.
@jimsagray589
25 күн бұрын
Any place deemed sensitive should be required to provide armed security. 12:02
@robertoandrade6939
25 күн бұрын
Do we really need permission to carry for protection? I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6
@williamhouk2829
22 күн бұрын
Will you have this information in the next CRPA magazine? I like hearing you guys, but I would feel better reading it. Thanks!
@justme294
25 күн бұрын
Let's go for final judgment and speed up the process to then take it to the Supreme Court.
@randyrhondeau8958
24 күн бұрын
Agree. Save time and money this way, especially based on bias of Ninth Circuit.
@rushimfamilyrushin8679
24 күн бұрын
I agree it’s a weird opinion the panel must have been drinking “Jim Jones Juice” just before they made their act of “OMISSION” decision.
@peanut3050
25 күн бұрын
so its still a waste of money and time to get this very limited ccw in ca.
@MikeB-ff6zr
24 күн бұрын
The Legislature hopes people see it that way.
@TheHarleywolf
24 күн бұрын
Where in the Constitution is the clause that allows the federal government let alone the states control firearms.
@anthonysilva4410
24 күн бұрын
What about grocery stores, gas stations and liquor stores that sell alcohol but not for consumption on that property?
@con6lex
23 күн бұрын
Here is one of the clarifications needed: let’s say I order a take out pizza from a restaurant that serves alcohol to people dining in. I can’t carry when I drive to the shared lot, parked, and walk in and out to get my pizza? Am I supposed to park somewhere else, unholster & unload (less safe then leaving gun in holster loaded), walk to restaurant? Silly and stupid, but this is what Dems want. What if my dentist is in the same strip mall as a restaurant with a beer & wine service? Is the entire lot off limits? May move out of state. But will continue to send $ to CRPA.
@kellym3531
25 күн бұрын
Relocate the Ninth Circus to Anchorage. It won't take long for things to change.
@alr5373
23 күн бұрын
No where in the Constitution does it give the government rights to take our rights away.
@roncoon3464
24 күн бұрын
Having to acquire a permit to exercise a Right degrades said Right into a privilege. The 2nd amendment, all by itself, is We The People’s Right/Permit to Bear Arms, Open Carry or Concealed. PERIOD!
@StarwaterCWS
25 күн бұрын
Bonita is one evil dude.
@anthonysilva4410
24 күн бұрын
You mean Bonta?
@StarwaterCWS
24 күн бұрын
@@anthonysilva4410 Casa Bonita, Commie Kamayla, Demoncrats. It’s just my preference in who I call them.
@randyrhondeau8958
24 күн бұрын
Don't go en banc, get the district court case decided, then movem up from there. Don't waste money with a case that is interlocutory status. That will only waste time and funds before get to SCOTUS for a decision in our favor! Bonta would love us to spend for money and waste time with this case.
@kevos823
25 күн бұрын
Will a win in the May case change the section of law that says you lose your CCW if you happen to be on private property that where the owner doesn't allow firearms. Like how Eli Dickens wasn't supposed to be carrying in that mall but he was, saved lives, and didn't lose his permit.
@jimmybutler1379
25 күн бұрын
BUT FEARFUL POLICE CAN ASK FOR YOUR PERMIT TO BE SURRENDERED !...
@JRTC88
25 күн бұрын
Just a FYI most Hospitals have a liquor license. They offer champagne in L&D after a birth of a child.
@Kh2456
25 күн бұрын
I work in healthcare and have never heard about this… no hospital in the US is serving liquor after a birth.
@JRTC88
25 күн бұрын
@@Kh2456 I also work in Health care the Nations Largest HMO and I can tell you the group that I work with does have a liquor license to serve a tiny bottle of champagne after birth. We also were served a tiny bottle of champagne for all 3 of my kids.
@Kh2456
25 күн бұрын
@@JRTC88 largest HMO in the US is Kaiser by a long shot. They didn’t offer us Champagne.
@davidgenie-ci5zl
25 күн бұрын
The hospital is not a bar. A ccw carry is allowed in say a restaurant that serves booze, but the CCW carrier can not consume booze while carrying. However a bar, where booze is the primary product served is off limits to a ccw carry no matter if you dont consume booze there, you cannot carry in a bar, a place that primarily serves booze.
@JRTC88
25 күн бұрын
@@davidgenie-ci5zl The dession was restaurant that serves alcohol. Not. may not consume alcohol at a restaurant that serves alcohol
@MichaelDunn-kc7og
25 күн бұрын
What is the status of the case against the 11% tax?
@jacobew2000
25 күн бұрын
Where is the open carry lawsuit? Concealed carry can be limited, open carry can not.
@chuck_in_socal
25 күн бұрын
The restrictive open carry laws made the CCW more obtainable. I'd rather carry concealed.
@jaustincarter
25 күн бұрын
@@chuck_in_socalNo they didn’t. No matter what *you* might prefer, the right of all the people is to have a choice of open or concealed without Government infringement.
@jacobew2000
24 күн бұрын
@@chuck_in_socal SCOTUS said in Heller that Concealed carry was not a civil right. Not to burst the bubble of my NRA friends, but that is what they said was in the history of carry laws. Open carry was "...Calculated to incite men to be manly and noble defense of themselves". Concealed carry was seen as a "...tendency to seek advantages and unmanly assassinations". Open carry bans violate the Constitution, and can not be banned. That is why that they can require background checks today on Concealed carry.
@MikeB-ff6zr
24 күн бұрын
Good luck obtaining permission for open carry and then being in public displaying a gun.
@jacobew2000
24 күн бұрын
@@MikeB-ff6zr That is why there are ongoing lawsuits against the open carry bans. It is a civil right, not a permission slip.
@robertoandrade6939
25 күн бұрын
Do we really need permission to carry 🤔
@JoeCensored
24 күн бұрын
Because of how complicated this list is to remember, the list is going to end up being ignored. Whenever laws are written with the expectation that they will routinely be ignored, it damages the rule of law itself.
@mgarc1960
25 күн бұрын
Just to be clear, a restaurant that sells beer, we cannot carry inside or the parking lot?
@RJ-TRB19
23 күн бұрын
Blame SCOTUS for this.
@zmbombr
23 күн бұрын
Ccw permit is prohibiting and infringement...
@JRTC88
25 күн бұрын
The issue is the Restaurants that servers alcohol and their parking lots that in it self is a catch all. What parking lot that doesn’t have a restaurant that servers alcohol.
@philiphorner31
25 күн бұрын
That Court is nutty.
@2-old-Forthischet
25 күн бұрын
Doesn't a camper or RV fall under the castle doctrine, even here in Commiefornia?
@joenull5945
24 күн бұрын
Per CA case laws, it depends... If the camper/RV is parked and hooked up in a designated camping or RV area, then it is treated as a residence. Firearm can be loaded inside the camper/RV. If the camper/RV is traveling or parked in a non-designated camping or RV area, then it is treated as a vehicle. Firearm needs to be unloaded and in a locked container.
@egmjag
25 күн бұрын
I am grateful for organizations like yours but I cannot support any organization that thinks a right requires permission. I tried complying but all it got me is money wasted and a denial. It’s too restrictive when I live and I wouldn’t spend $1000 or more on the process of getting a permit. I carry everywhere, even in places like Whole Foods. And my primary mode of transportation will be bicycling and public transportation to sometimes take my bike on the bus or subway. That will include parks as well for mtb. I’m not about to allow myself to become a victim after several incidents where I faced eminent threats. I’m my first and often times only line of defense.
24 күн бұрын
This infringing has been going on for 90 yrs...when are the infringements going to stop and be reversed?
@davidnorris1599
24 күн бұрын
There was an advertisement for Kamala????
@marcofguzman3075
25 күн бұрын
😮This should be very clear if you're interested in entering the Carrie of the people, and your a elected official or employee of a public agency, you should be held accountable and responsible for your actions by law 😉 and the civil Cervantes will just jump in their place of public Servants and service outomatic and with a smile 😃
@coldspring624
24 күн бұрын
The 9th can pound sand
@Tim_Lisa728
22 күн бұрын
Do the newly defined 'Sensitive Areas' become effective and Law immediately?
@ecobasetech4558
25 күн бұрын
Why does everyone keep throwing Oregon in the list when referencing semi auto or "Assault Weapon" bans? We currently DO NOT HAVE THOSE BANS IN Place. The only "ban" we have right now is on unfinished frmes/receivers, and that only just went into effect about a week ago!
@anthonysilva4410
24 күн бұрын
Because California will try to use those states as an example of why they should be banned here as well. While we are focused on the California 2A stuff, what goes on in the rest of the country has effects for other states, both good and bad.
@MikeB-ff6zr
24 күн бұрын
Is that issue related to SB2 and CCW restrictions?
@MB-js4us
23 күн бұрын
What about community colleges?
@justinantonius2823
23 күн бұрын
Why waste your time putting a sign up that says guns allowed put up a sign that says guns required now that'll really get somebody's attention 🤣😂👌
@noname831
25 күн бұрын
How many parking lots have restaurants that serve alcohol? That’s a huge hit. Chipotle even sells alcohol. What’s the point of going through the ccw process? Show any evidence or data that shows a ccw holder uses their firearm for a crime? They only want you to carry in your home or driveway? Bonta is a moron.
@Frankgrimes-Grimey
20 күн бұрын
The bill text mentions a facility with the primary function of serving alcohol. So restaurants would be fine, a bar that serves food wouldn't be.
@noname831
20 күн бұрын
@@Frankgrimes-Grimey you must have not payed attention to the update. Bars AND Restaurants That serve alcohol. So please explain your logic of how restaurants are ok when most of them also serve alcohol?
@billylerch1776
25 күн бұрын
When I watch these videos, it’s Groundhog Day all over again. It’s just news with no good news. We’re tired of the BS!
@dennisdow6797
23 күн бұрын
When do these new rules start
@HManning
24 күн бұрын
That's what they do SMFH
@jerrysigua1913
24 күн бұрын
So, this is an opinion of the 9th Circuit? Does it mean that it is in effect as of right now or when does it go into effect? Can we file an appeal to this opinion?
@Barry851
24 күн бұрын
Why are we following Canadian law where in the United States?
@PG-lf3rr
25 күн бұрын
I didn't see banks/financial institutions
@MikeB-ff6zr
24 күн бұрын
Right. That part of the injunction was upheld.
@andrewmattila1918
25 күн бұрын
Shall Not Be Infringed!! 1776!!
@IAmThePrepper
24 күн бұрын
I don’t understand this. I thought libraries, hospitals, and financial institutions are already sensitive locations. And now they make them that we can carry?
@MikeB-ff6zr
24 күн бұрын
The preliminary injunction said no to calling those places “sensitive” but the appeals court has reversed that part of the injunction, making them gun-free zones for law abiding people again. Criminals only.
@franciscobadilla8014
20 күн бұрын
so is this in effective now then?
@dandahermitseals5582
25 күн бұрын
Hmm
@edwardbaeza8858
25 күн бұрын
if these lawyer were worth their salt they would have ask the judges to answer this question hunters and fisherman can carry canceled when hunting and fishing are they now affected also Obama signed a bill allowing CCW holder to carrier in national parks.. what the reason why CCW holder prevent from State parks doesn't make sense.. These attorneys are just milking the members of the GOC, CRPA, AND THE REST OF GUN OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS.. Fire the who bunch...!!! There worthless..😢😢😢😢
@paulrodgers252
25 күн бұрын
Opinion is a United States Constitution Law Word and Form establish in Article.II.2.1 and whom has Authority to give it;
@susannarducci3350
25 күн бұрын
What a joke!
@molonaabe
25 күн бұрын
Can only speak for myself, I bike daily on bike trails, don’t know if they consider that a park, and frankly, I dont care, going to continue what I am doing, as far as this parking lot BS, there is already a law(s) stating that I can have it in my trunk with the mag taken out, dont go to parks too much,
@dylans2669
25 күн бұрын
What does "under the control of..." mean under the statue when there are multiple entities that are attached to the same parking area like in much of the state. For example, I could go to target, where target shares its parking lot with any number of other businesses which may or may not fall under one of the relevant statutes (e.g., maybe gyms, restaurants that may serve alcohol, a daycare etc.).
@jasonb9913
25 күн бұрын
If that part gets upheld, it will likely be applied based on which establishments you intend to visit. It's the only way I can see them trying to let that part of the law stand and to be able to enforce it. But even that is questionable.
@dylans2669
25 күн бұрын
@@jasonb9913 What does the intent of where I might plan to go have to do with "control"?
@seancowhie6951
25 күн бұрын
Bonta is a power tripping mofo
@d_k_C_A
25 күн бұрын
He will run for governor and as dumb as we are here in California he will win...
@4g63attack
25 күн бұрын
Bonta will be like the next Philippines president Ferdinand Marcos
@joshuafine2035
25 күн бұрын
For sensitive places. What is the punishment? Is it different for a CCW Licensee versus an unlicensed criminal in these places?
@joshuafine2035
25 күн бұрын
Also what about private security entering a sensitive area while protecting an individual? Is that a violation?
@larryjanson4011
25 күн бұрын
simple.. If a leo can carry in a place, so can CCW holders. as i know it even leo can not carry in court, jail, etc. i see no reason to ban a CCW holder from a bar. if they get drunk and hurt any one there are laws on the books already. and most CCW holders would lose there CCW if convected of drunk driving. maybe even if arrested of most any crime. i do not see or hear of many CCW holders doing such crimes. and most are upstanding people. they would not do any such. in-fact might go out of there not to commit a crime.
@kmccree22
20 күн бұрын
This shit is sad! I give up.
@douggabrielson9734
22 күн бұрын
It’s a loss.
@ucla89
25 күн бұрын
So I can carry a loaded, concealed firearm into a hospital and a bank, but I can't set foot in a bank parking lot, or even leave my loaded firearm in a lockbox in my car in the bank parking lot, because a restaurant shares that lot and the restaurant serves alcohol, even though I'm not going to the restaurant and I'm not drinking any alcohol, and will be no closer than 50 yards to any alcohol. So my enumerated right ends with a parcel of real estate's connection to alcohol. Got it. I'm absolutely sure that's what the framers intended (sarcasm). California's governor is just like Alabama Governor George Wallace-- the governor who blocked the door to the University of Alabama to prevent blacks from entering-- by similarly taking blatantly unconstitutional steps to deny citizens their constitutional rights. Even this 3 judge panel of the ultra liberal 9th Circuit found half of this law unconstitutional, and it looks like it will take the Supreme Court to strike down the other half.
@golfblood22
24 күн бұрын
There were no wins here. This is all a loss.
@singerap
23 күн бұрын
Stop appealing these injunctions and get a final judgement. All this does is delay final clarification and plays into the hands of gun controllers. At least we got some relief out of this horrible 3 judge panel.
@LoneWolf-zh1wr
25 күн бұрын
ALL CAPS. WHAT IS THE POINT OF HAVE A CCW LICENSE IF THE FRAD LICENSE WE ALL HAVE IS NO GOOD. THEFTS IS WHAT IS. NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS.
@youtuber174
25 күн бұрын
KZitem SUPPRESSING THIS ACCOUNT I CANNOT SUBSCRIBE
@edwardbaeza8858
25 күн бұрын
we need new lawyers, a new law firm this law firm cant win a jaywalking case and jaywalking is no longer illegal... terrible group of lawyers.. Booo...!
@MikeB-ff6zr
23 күн бұрын
Which law firm?
@marcofguzman3075
25 күн бұрын
They definitely are thinking of tribes in a not good way,ae savages said it 🙄 ok
@IAmThePrepper
24 күн бұрын
I feel like this chuck guy might not remember his materials fully.
@DF-DefendFREEDOM
21 күн бұрын
Bruen states sensitive places only government buildings, polling locations, schools by students not adults as it was historically. Does the 9th circuit violate Bruen.? All else is Constitutional carry.
@matthewh.kimm.d.9784
25 күн бұрын
Again, sounds like idiotic judges with no critical thinking making judgments..
@IAmThePrepper
24 күн бұрын
I feel like this chuck guy might not remember his materials fully.
@MikeB-ff6zr
24 күн бұрын
How so? This Chuck guy is a nationally recognized firearms rights lawyer.
Пікірлер: 176