Watching and listening to these kind of videos always bring me back to the fundamental question I ask myself - what the hell am I?!
@corkkyle
13 жыл бұрын
I can produce a super-computer that will smoke any supercomputer in production today... it takes me about 9 months to build it, and then about 18 years to train it.
@Awesomenizzleness
13 жыл бұрын
I actually looked this up by using my brain
@starwarsgeek8
15 жыл бұрын
Damn... My brain's just a jumble of equations? I feel mortally insulted.
@okuma0kuma
14 жыл бұрын
when they crack the code i hope they install firewall i dont want flash adverts projected into my dreams lol
@kasuskasus
14 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to his holographic presentation in 9 years!
@jsymons1985
13 жыл бұрын
that's 100 billion laptops
@Boehoehuahoei
13 жыл бұрын
i haven't seen this video for a while now! BUT THIS IS AWESOME!!!! 8 years to go! lol
@einbischen
13 жыл бұрын
Jeez I wonder how much he gets paid to study such things. A lot or a little? does he make more money than kobe bryant or george clooney?
@jsymons1985
13 жыл бұрын
Once you build the circuit, how do you then model the dynamics of the morphology of the "circuitry" itself, that is, how the neurons re-wire themselves based on learning. If the circuitry is static, and the only dynamics are those of the circuit, namely, the cumulative firings between neurons, the brain is never really learning. Am I right? In other words, the brain architecture changes over time. How do you account for this?
@zedpapa
15 жыл бұрын
So this says our brain is a universe itself. So what if our universe is a brain itself? What if we are all part of a universal brain, our solar system, our galaxy are a part of a brain of a higher being that we don't know of, because we can't sense it. Think about it, can a cell of a neuron know that it's actually a part of a sophisticated organ, a brain? I think this is interesting.
@saerain
15 жыл бұрын
He didn't propose any new theory. That wasn't the point. He was filling us in on the progress of the research. Meet TED.
@SpinyNormanDinsdale
15 жыл бұрын
I can't believe how clear and concise this talk was, especially since it involved the brain!. It was so elegantly spoken and he skillfully avoided talking psycho-babel which I think we all appreciate :)
@GODHEPME
13 жыл бұрын
Damn science you're scary !
@MrVrsilvestrejr2008
13 жыл бұрын
Supercomputer can perform perfectly at Antarctica, Alaska, Greenland, Arctic, North Canada and North Russia.
@TheLoserKingdom
13 жыл бұрын
@Flem1337 I'm a 17 year old (a dumb one at that) and I could understand most of what he said. Of course, I did need to search up a bit to have a more thorough understanding of what he was talking about, but hey, we never stop learning. In face, this video, along with Jill Bolte Taylor's TED talk enabled me to get a 96% on my English essay about truth, reality and perception! I love learning about the brain, and this project excites me!
@131kimber
14 жыл бұрын
Ethics and free will will be the questions. There are many good things that can come from this, but the seduction of illegally controlling another that someone else has decided needs "fix" will be a big issue that will need to addressed.
@doloppost
15 жыл бұрын
I agree. So the craft of appliance by powerhouses could be called a tool of evolution?
@drop_table_music
13 жыл бұрын
This is very similar to Hierarchical Temporal Memory, and both of them are different implementations of Adaptive Resonance Theory.
@silentmagesoul
14 жыл бұрын
This guy ... has absolutely no idea what he's talking about. Especially the end. Total nonsense: "We indeed, for the first time, saw these ghostly-like structures, electrical objects appearing within the neo-cortical column ... and then when we zoomed into this it's like a veritable universe ... take these brain coordinates and project them into perceptual space" Really? Really? I don't have enough characters to talk about everything wrong in this segment, but just think about what he's saying.
@xweather
13 жыл бұрын
And, as we can see, Raymond Kurzweil was right: the Singularity is near !
@neverthat79
14 жыл бұрын
@leostoltoy If the universe is around 15 billion years old, than it took it around 11 billion years to create the first brain. Which also goes together with what he says later, that the universe has evolved a brain to see itself. Also reminds one of Carl Sagan: "We are the way the cosmos can know itself"
@AutodidacticPhd
15 жыл бұрын
Seeing as these simulations are run on computers, and thus are completely and understandably deterministic, any simulation you run on it can be perfectly recreated at any time. Besides, I highly doubt that they are going to get anywhere near what we would recognize as consciousness in anything like the time table he laid down.
@NicknVio
14 жыл бұрын
1/2 He said ( H. Markram ), that 99.9% of what we " perceive" is not actually what we see. Which manifests how fast at the nano scale the brain is working, even before the eyes have seen the actual object, the mind is already infering and comong up with perceptions which can be verified by the eye. All of which happens in a split second. I remember when MIchio kaku was asked, " is the human brain a nano computer?, Michio answered no in a subtle way. What H. Markram is building, the blue brain .
@NicknVio
14 жыл бұрын
2/2 What H. Markram is building, the blue brain could be the nano computer Michio was referring to that will make silicon-based computer obsolete in the future. After all, it could be the human brain Michio Kaku.
@LordMorningStar
15 жыл бұрын
I am in LOVE with SCIENCE!!!!
@iambehindthemirror
13 жыл бұрын
@neymoura But we don't. There is only a tiny, very short period in the evolution period of a conscious being during which the being is occupied with emulation of living creatures. Our road towards pecfection is very long, and we are almost in the beginning. In a matter of few centuries or millenia humanity will evolve to a certain level, when that happens we won't be occupying our lifes with such things.
@YourCritic
15 жыл бұрын
You have to admit, artificial intelligence is a truly fascinating topic. If there's one thing I wish I could see before I die is for someone to build a "self aware" computer.
@leostoltoy
14 жыл бұрын
"It took the universe 11 billion years to build a brain". But Earth is only 4.5 billion years old, and life 3.5 billion years old. "The human brain is still evolving at an enormous speed" - I think this is a nonsensical phrase in terms of evolutionary theory. Everything living is evolving at all times, but unless we can point to a very large change in the rate of either death or reproduction influenced by different kinds of brain, we can't predict whether the brain is evolving significant change
@planetoperator
15 жыл бұрын
yeah, that's what happens when people recite and not research. i've made knowing and researching the sky and the universe my life, and plenty know more than me. it doesn't bother me when someone questions me or says i'm wrong, it motivates me to double check my theories and beliefs, and i usually learn something new..
@x3haloed
13 жыл бұрын
@Kaeralho It'll happen. Computer power grows exponentially.
@dismutased
15 жыл бұрын
Astounding. I hope we see this technology evolve into something very interesting.
@xTriad
15 жыл бұрын
This is one of the best TED talks. Great speech.
@P00P0STER0US
15 жыл бұрын
The concept of being able to build a brain is both exciting and terrifying. I don't know if we'll have synthethic brains in 10 years but I might go pull Blade Runner off my dvd rack and give it a spin.
@disturbthedead2930
13 жыл бұрын
@davidfordapple I feel sorry for the fool that gives up without even trying. It's not a matter of "can it be done" but "how soon". There is no logical reason whatsoever that a brain cannot be reproduced by other means.
@ultravidz
15 жыл бұрын
woww this is what ive been waiting for from Ted!!
@Yggdrasill8
15 жыл бұрын
As long as we continue our exponential progress in science, it seems very certain that this will eventually be solved considering how far we came from just the last century. Thing is, the final answer to this question might seem completely different or ever more complex than what we previously postulated.
@Dirtfire
15 жыл бұрын
The first brains evolved between 550 and 600 million years ago, not 11 billion. Interesting talk, though.
@gucker07
15 жыл бұрын
the theory he is presenting here around the 13-15 minute mark is just mind-blowing. i doubt many people listening to markram for the first time realize what he is actually saying though..
@Udinbak
13 жыл бұрын
@Udinbak cont2. The region would have to be passive at first in order to train the new brain to understand the sensory experience, then active control gradually increased while the mind becomes accustomed to making self adjustments. safety protocols in place of course. active and passive control at the early phases would be counter productive, since the young mind would exploratorially make potentially damaging alterations which could render the mind insane. or the equivalent.. just a thought..
@Udinbak
13 жыл бұрын
@Udinbak cont. It could see which connections are active during a particular thought, it could refine it's thoguht processes, edvice on improvements, or refinements. It could ask to sever a synapse in order to reduce an unwanted response, strengthen it to increase a desireable response, even request a new synaptic pathway to connect and explore disparate functions/memories/senses/etc (synesthesia). If the new region could make these adjustments, then it would be able to do it automatically.
@Udinbak
13 жыл бұрын
just a few tips to consider when you've got the brain mapped and symulated.. basically consider giving it extra regions. by which I mean, for example, create a region which is given information on the brain ie the information the reasearchers are lookng at. not all of it, but at least the map of neural activity. then connect that region with the visual cortex. The point being to allow the simulated consciousness to "see" how it's brain functions. That way, it can give direct feedback.
@Udinbak
13 жыл бұрын
@Udinbak cont3. the study of creating new regions in order to process information in new ways (like a region that analyses visual input and computes precise distances, velocities, mass, angles, weight, etc. or one that can interpret hmtl and has access to the internet) will be invaluable when you (the future) get round to addnig functionality to the human brain.virtualising a new region and integrating it into an unaltered human brain will be the key to transhuman consciousness.
@SonOfTerra92
13 жыл бұрын
Science is awesome !!!
@ReductioAdAbsurdum
15 жыл бұрын
"it's blew a gasket" Indeed. :) I wrote the same phrase earlier in this phrase and got it right. The typing fingers sometimes have a mind of their own; muscle memory, I guess. I have a real problem transposing 'think' and 'thing', do it all the time.
@aaronkeogh
15 жыл бұрын
This is quite interesting because I've read that, a brain can grow infinitely big with a relative amount of energy
@etiennealive
15 жыл бұрын
That was pretty amazing to see ! 5 stars !
@SpunkySkunk347
15 жыл бұрын
I like this video a lot - too actually be able to map out the processes, the coding, the hard-wiring of neuronal circuitry is amazing - I can't wait to see the results.
@Ibogaineuk1
15 жыл бұрын
Hmmm...there are some interesting consequences of the points that have been raised here pertaining to mental equilibrium. I would use an analogy that nearly all psychotropic drugs (especially SSRI's) are tantamount to being nothing more than blunt instruments, like using a chain saw for brain surgery, conversely entheogens that attenuate essential neurotransmitters such as Serotonin or dopamine can be likened to being a precision "scalpel" like tool. Way way cool.......
@etiennealive
15 жыл бұрын
So the universe has a self and has created many selfs to take a look at its self. These selves have created a computer with a communication netwerk which enables us to get faster and more efficient a better look at our self and the self of the universe. and now some selfs try to create a self inside the computer to get a better look at our selfs etc.. etc... !? hmmm just imagine. I'm gona put my self to sleep now , it's already late....
@unityallusa
15 жыл бұрын
If God Hindered and Got in the way, why did Isaac Newton, discover more than any other scientist, before or since...... and yet he wrote more than twice as much on biblical matters...... "If God Dun it" Was such a hinderance, why did it help him soooo much??????????? Seems "God Dun it" inspired him to go further than any man ever!!!!!!!!
@onedollarwill
14 жыл бұрын
Has anyone told this obviously intelligent man that darwinism is a proven hoax? Human Beings were obviously far more ingenious in the past. Who cut, moved, and set in place giant stones. Who built Angkor Wat, Pumapunku, & Adam's Calender, As well as, complex Pyramid structures in nearly country in the world, (Cities, Pyramids, and other underwater structures)? Ancient Humans were so intelligent, They Created these time tested structures, (and who knows what else) without destroying us with oil.
@Mood1ndigo
14 жыл бұрын
@TritonAlias I will admit that my comment was a bit conceited. But I wasn't accusing others of being reactionary. I was merely arguing against the popular consensus (at least among the viewership of this video) that religion is a mark of evolutionary inferiority, worthy of being stamped out - and that most religious folk are "reactionary idiots." Of course, your own favorite videos make your biases abundantly clear. Anyways, we've spent enough time on this, and I wish you well.
@omegavalerius
14 жыл бұрын
Any gamer would say their game is more than a game. In poker reading the opponent just happens to be the game (cards matter less). I objected to the analogy because in poker you only have to deal with a few variables when in politics you aren't dealing with only a table full of people at any given time. Lots of very powerful nations have met their end in history but lets hope we are getting better at finding other solutions than power play.
@omegavalerius
14 жыл бұрын
The soviets would have been able to release enough destructive power against the U.S to make a devastating blow. The calculation in the white house I believe was that the soviets wouldn't do that out their notion of self preservation. This turned out to be a correct bet but I don't know if it was one that would have persuaded me as a president to play with. I would have used the character of Gorbachev as a key to peace. He was clearly peace loving type.
@omegavalerius
14 жыл бұрын
Yes indeed he took power in 1985. Your argument is one often put forward and I see both its strength and what I would say weakness which was mainly that precisely the huge power of the arms raise and the SDI made it impossible for the Russians to negotiate about mutually cutting down their arsenals when a more peace loving regime was in place 1985 onwards. I also consider it as a risky move in good or worse to force a nation choose between war and loosing status as a world power.
@Udinbak
14 жыл бұрын
it's not artificial intelligence. it's artificial sentience. the simulated brain is conscious. however, it depends on how well they have modelled the chemical interactions. if/when they get to the stage where the human brain is modelled in it's entirety, it will essentially be human consciousness, with associated emotions. it would be cruel not to connect it to a camera, microphone and speakers when running the simulation.
@BehshadMemari
15 жыл бұрын
He has spent a good sum of cash and has shown us some magnificent graphical simulations, but he hasn't got a clue what's going on in there. That's the big problem he's trying to glide over. I certainly don't blame them for trying & support any research in this area, but we need to spend more money on a few good theorists & engineers, if we are to make any headway within the upcoming decade. I share Markram's view on philosophy (i.e. theory of consciousness) but still have faith in Maths. :)
@greenanubis
15 жыл бұрын
it cant die, that entity is comprised of information(binary) in a form that can be ARCHIVED...indefinitely. theoretically. human brain is also information, held by glia and neuron cells and synaptic network, which ultimately are built by atoms and molecules, you can say that it is comprised by quantum information (material/atomical configuration). but if you emulate it in observable information format (binary), you can "see" human intelligence, maybe understand it... maybe even IMPROVE it!
@Chemicalogic
15 жыл бұрын
Lol.....that's what I thought. Couldn't come up with anything, eh? Not surprising. You may as well be religious, because you argue with the same weak tactics, mainly: substituting insult for content. You can go back to trolling; it's where you belong--it truly pains me to see some one deny their true nature. Leave the adults to have proper intellectual discussions. Nice try. Run along.
@Chemicalogic
15 жыл бұрын
"most closed minded, authority loving, god hating, thought police out there."..........What! Really?? Either you have not read any of their work, or you're just upset that they're far smarter than yourself and your little ego feels threatened. Both men apply that same skeptical approach you were talking about and came to the conclusion that a jealous sky god is utter bullshit. No dogma, no thought crime, no propaganda, just good skeptical science. I can see how that would scare you.
@Septeus7
15 жыл бұрын
Since the computer is using equations that rely on a digital process isn't he assuming that all the operation of the neocortex are reducible to a digital process but if our brains can perceive a reality that is no reducible to digital process such as the Catinary curve then isn't whole theory a bust and some called model isn't modeling anything substituting a digital simulation for not digital processes?
@d3daiM
15 жыл бұрын
Yup, fear is how everything gets done. Set man against himself. Divide and conquer. It's such a nasty scheme... It's human fate to be susceptible to it. It's unfortunate. Us "five percenters" have been lucky enough to have been given an option in perceiving. It's my goal to use this knowledge throughout my life to enhance the quality of life for other people, because it is doing that that gives me the most satisfaction. Use your gift for good man. Peace.
@d3daiM
15 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that is definitely true. Many intelligent people can be chauvinistic to their own views. It wasn't but 100 years ago that Gregor Mendel was labeled a fanatic for applying mathematics through theory of probability in biology. Today it is a standard practice. It would be ignorant not to be open to the idea of another revolution in thought, science, spirituality.. I mean, it's about time to happen.
@Chemicalogic
15 жыл бұрын
And there is no objective answer to the "why" question, like there is an objective fact in a scientific context. It's not as if there is no wisdom to be found in religious teachings, but the key is to ferret out what is still relevant and what belongs in the past. Although, it almost impossible to do this when one takes the stance that religious doctrines are to be considered holy and beyond scrutiny. One is called intellectual freedom, and the other is thought crime. I know which I prefer.
@cristicbz
15 жыл бұрын
I think Chemicalogic is overreacting, but I agree that it's ok to bash other people's beliefs. It is true that nothing about the world can be known with certainty, but you can bash other people's belief for inconsistency. As was the example with "tree fairies". If you accept faith as a valid way of deriving hypothesis, you can't accept only one god, you have to accept all of them, together with fairies, unicorns and elves.
@cristicbz
15 жыл бұрын
Wikipedia is wrong on that point. Look it up some more. I am wrong as well, it's not because of the atmosphere either. It's true that their angular diameter is actually a bit smaller when the moon is near the horizon. There is, however, no consensus as to why the moon appears larger on the horizon, and the theory that it's because it's compared to the foreground has been discredited many times. So Wikipedia and this guy are wrong. Since I'm not giving a TED talk, it's less important that I am.
@falthorn85
15 жыл бұрын
you're wrong about the moon. it looks larger when it's near the horizon because you can compare it's size with houses or trees. from wikipedia: "The Moon appears larger when close to the horizon. This is a purely psychological effect (see Moon illusion). It is actually about 1.5% smaller when the Moon is near the horizon than when it is high in the sky (because it is farther away by up to one Earth radius)." so, think a little bit before you write something.
@ExDxReflection
15 жыл бұрын
Please don't try to discredit my argument, by trying to make me look like a fool, I know both sides of the argument. I went to bible school, and I am now majoring in biotechnology, I have made an A in several credited biology classes, and I really do know what I am talking about, if you do not believe what I say, well thats up to you. but please do not be so naive to not believe that 1+1=2... or to start name calling...
@Chemicalogic
15 жыл бұрын
There's nothing wrong with challenging the "beliefs" of those around you. It may seem disrespectful, but ultimately, if you can't support your beliefs, how do you justify having them? People believe all kinds of kooky shit, and those beliefs should be treated with a corresponding amount of respect. And some of us just have a lower tolerance for kooky shit, and enough intelligence to see that creationist claims hold as much water as tree fairies.
@Shigren
15 жыл бұрын
thanks. I as a normal child went to church because mommy and daddy wanted me to, however when I reached the age of 10 I got saved and started going because I wanted to. I am the perfect example for religious indoctrination. My old religion may have shaped a bit of me, but that is merely a small portion of who I am. I cannot know what I would be like if i hadn't grown up religious, but I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be much different.
@haytam112211
15 жыл бұрын
the brain may be constructed, however the "observer" cannot. the brain is just a processor that translates in this case visual information (light) coming through the senses (eye) into pulses as shown. It is not the brain that sees, it is "you" (some call it consciousness, soul) the observer that see and understand its reality. it is the same observer that consciously decides to make a certain decision (move one finger and not the other for no reason)
@Shigren
15 жыл бұрын
your first paragraph is completely true, however, it is not basic psychology that proves Newtons religious beliefs helped him with science. I was a christian for the first 21 years of my life, did that aid me on making it to states in swimming? Swimming is a mental sport, that being said I am just as proficient in backstroke as I was 4 years ago. Did it aid me in any academics for that matter? No it did not. I'm sorry but you are making stupid assertions.
@Shigren
15 жыл бұрын
His belief in god did not help him in the slightest with his scientific endeavors! Show me proof that it aided him. It did not. He was by chance a christian, that made scientific discoveries. Please take a look at Galileo's life and tell me how much god helped him in his scientific endeavors. In fact religion has stalled the study of science since the two decided they were incompatible.
@HarshColby
15 жыл бұрын
Nice logic. If you're going to give god credit for helping out Newton, then you need to also give him credit for holding back the several trillion people before Newton that didn't discover as much. Maybe Newton was just a smart guy? Nah, that would be too obvious. I'm sure it was the magic beans. Pasteur disproved [every possible] spontaneous generation theory [and proved abiogenesis 100% impossible]? Your science knowledge astounds me.
@Shigren
15 жыл бұрын
you are partly right. As long as he keeps his religion in this little bubble that doesn't effect any other part of his thinking, then yes it doesn't hinder him. However as soon as he tries to incorporate religion into his research it becomes flawed. for example the god dun it analogy. It stops people from trying to figure something out, because to them the answer is god did and thats all that matters. that way of thinking is as wrong as it gets, and hinders anybody that thinks that way
@TheSeaMyst
15 жыл бұрын
This all sounds more 'like Frankenstein" The creation of life but the thing is this is not life it is further from life than sand. Our brains are capable of things even science has no figured out' There is and entrance to our brains that can be filled with great knowledge but it will never be filled with anything accept death from our will. How do I no all of this because mine has been being filled not with my understanding but the lord god almightys. With witch is now in me'
@ReductioAdAbsurdum
15 жыл бұрын
"It's just dogma of another kind." What exactly is my dogma? I've not said that emotions are inherently bad, in fact I never even said they "make us believe 'stupid shit'"; words you carelessly or deliberately put in my mouth. But they CAN be dangerous, they CAN make us believe stupid or even dangerous shit, of not tempered by reason, if taken to be a reliable measure of objective reality.
@ReductioAdAbsurdum
15 жыл бұрын
"What is the basis for saying that our emotions make us believe 'stupid shit'?" Are you kidding?! The world is overwhelmingly theistic, despite the absurdity of religious texts and a complete lack of evidence for ANY deity, simply because religion meets EMOTIONAL needs: you're given meaning and purpose, you're never alone, always loved, will never die, will never be permanently separated from your loved ones, all suffering and injustice is for a reason and will be righted in the end, etc.
@ReductioAdAbsurdum
15 жыл бұрын
"you could be less agressive man" I have no patience for live4Cha's type -- patronizing, sanctimonious, and utterly clueless -- which you see all over KZitem. If he's going to disparage science, I want him to be able to say WHY. I tried to force him to articulating SOMETHING, anything, but I got nothing but that vacant smile and nod routine. I can't view aggressively anti-intellectual people, people who in all honestly consider ignorance a virtue, with anything but contempt.
@ReductioAdAbsurdum
15 жыл бұрын
"I am afraid you dn't feel peace in talking with me." Of course not. You claimed emotions are produced by the circulatory system, not the brain. When asked why you believe something that is demonstrable false (see: cardiopulmonary bypass), you said it's because you love people more. *rofl* You've demonstrated that you're ignorant, have terrible critical thinking skills, feel that you're morally superior as a result, and flee from debate when cornered. Bravo on all counts.
@ReductioAdAbsurdum
15 жыл бұрын
"That is kind a postulate that heart is just a pump, like so many others. You can hold on to it if you it gives you peace." Are you saying the heart is NOT a pump?! I don't "hold on to it" because it gives me peace -- holding beliefs because they feel good is antithetical to science -- I hold that belief because it's a fact. "Please allow me see science in context of humanity." How could you not? Science was CREATED by humanity, the entire methodology is deeply rooted in our humanity.
@ReductioAdAbsurdum
15 жыл бұрын
Your response makes no sense at all. If not for the fact that you quoted a phrase from my comment, I wouldn't be able to tell it was related to my post at all. You asked, "What about the heart?" What about it? It's an organ that circulates blood, so your cell's can get oxygen and nutrients. It's not where emotions come from. That's what I mean by not taking a metaphor literally. When we say someone has a "big heart" we don't mean their pulmonary organ is larger than normal.
@linfinster
15 жыл бұрын
They will create a hologram, a perception by the brain of something real but isn't. And they're doing this by mapping the brain of all the synapses and electrical activity, seeing how it interprets words and transforming that particular pattern into a computer that will create the "reality?" Is that what it comes down too? What would the applications for this knowledge be ( don't see how this gets them to a hologram) .. to our betterment or will man turn this technology into self destruction?!
@Chemicalogic
15 жыл бұрын
Yup, you're right, I don't buy into irrational creation myths and all the associated baggage. But, what I don't get is what you think I need help from? 1. Religious ignoramuses and their dogma slinging ways? 2. Violent religious paranoids? 3. A jealous space god who will punish me for not bowing to hypocritical pederasts? Education should protect me from the first two, and I'm pretty certain the last one is an empty threat, like all religious threats that don't include immediate violence.
@david0aloha
15 жыл бұрын
Many people forget that belief in god is not necessarily belief in religion. Religion, at least when taken is full, is doctrine - though it often contains lessons that are worth considering (considering being the key word as opposed to blind acceptance). Belief in god though is based on many factors, tangible and intangible. Many brilliant people believe in god - but many also don't.
@Sonyoooo3
15 жыл бұрын
Reality can come out just like a ghost but we can call it like mobile phone we connected with the ghost as we call hollowgram but the energy can be strong when ouside in a real world remember the scientist always said the universe are static negative to positive but this thing only wants one thing our life force so heaven or hell will stay alive. but i believe in true god that will bring me out of this positive and negative energy.
@4E65676174726F6E
15 жыл бұрын
Not hard to speculate. From 10,000 neurons to 10 Million in 10 years by 'law' of computational cost. From 10 Million to. 100 Million by using simpler vector processors rather than that horse of a machine they have now. 100 Million to 1 Billion by improvements in software. 1 Billion+ through budget increases, which can be expected if the structure shows adaptability and learning. Using a functional rather than biological model would also vastly increase neuron count.
@valken666
15 жыл бұрын
I dislike the way he calls hypothesis, theories. Our perceptions can change once we learn new concepts, the moon example only applies to an animal or ignorant human. This is why we can't communicate between species, they are not very good at concept acquisition. Simply simulating the entire brain and playing with its parts would be a much more interesting approach than trying to understand an incomplete one.
@flyhead2
15 жыл бұрын
The terms 'disorder' or 'mental disease' are used with great ease and certainty, but aren't these ultimately subjective descriptions? Psychology is not an absolute science; one only has to look at the past 100 years of development tu understand the fallibilty inherent. I could be argued that sosiopolitical factors play as important a role as medical considerations. If there is any truth in these comments the questions must be asked; can these technologies be safely applied and who arbitrates?
@nyctim2009
15 жыл бұрын
one computer equals one neuron but linking 10,000 computers or a million computers for that matter together will always give it a finite number of thought that is possible. A brain or one neuron for that matter is not finite but holds the possiblity to think infinitly. A person can and have thought of impossible things thoughout history, therefore the brain has the capacity to be infinite. That is something that computers can never do, is to think infinitively.
@blackshadowsnoopy
15 жыл бұрын
As children, many of us were read fairy-tale stories like the kiss of the Princess changing a frog into a Prince. As adults we know that such a thing is a fairy-tale, yet if we replace the kiss of a Princess with BILLIONS of years of chance and random processes, natural selection with nature red in tooth and claw and somehow these processes have magically transformed frogs into modern man ! It certainly takes greater faith to believe in such fairy-tales than that....In the beginning, God created
@etiennealive
15 жыл бұрын
Imagine a fusion of Henry Markram simulation of the brain and Edward Witten's M T heory, wich includes 7 extra dimensions and there correspondence with our 3 D - time world. I wonder how the picture of the rose would 'reflect"in 11 dimensions.
@aaronkeogh
15 жыл бұрын
Watch this video "/watch?v=X8Aurpr68uE" and just see the similarities of the universe as a web complex compared to the exact picture of the brain structure in this video. It's as if the universe has created something identical to itself.
@Mood1ndigo
14 жыл бұрын
And perhaps you should revise your own, pompous style of rhetoric before condemning others as "arrogant." Maybe I should have used more precise language, but your conclusions about my beliefs were entirely off-mark. Whether it was a deliberate strawman on your part or just a misunderstanding - I don't know.
@looni3
15 жыл бұрын
The brain is not a supernatural thing. We are physical beings. I know you probably think it makes life more interesting or meaningful to believe nonsense, and if that helps you get through your day, fair enough. Just don't try and peddle it in a public forum, because it is nonsense and people will tell you.
@looni3
15 жыл бұрын
If thoughts were at a higher level of conciousness then drugs would be unable to affect them. As they are able to I have to conclude you don't know what you're talking about. Especially as there is no such thing as telepathy; if you want to try and prove me wrong though James Randi will give you a million dollars for doing so.
@Shigren
15 жыл бұрын
You cannot prove something doesn't exist! The burden of proof lies with the claim that it did help him. If it did help him there would be evidence for it. There isn't evidence for something that didn't happen. So you aren't berating me with your beliefs? I merely reacted to something that offended me, as you are reacting to what offended you.
@stefannnn1k
15 жыл бұрын
God doesn't make miracle every 5 minutes, and the church is definitely not God himself. What do you expect...? Praying about 100.000$ and getting it the next morning? Religion is more than praying, its about having a healthy conscience and mind. This is how i get it, everyone is getting it their own way.
@ReductioAdAbsurdum
15 жыл бұрын
"it is somehow an youtube phenomena, that people go very fast over to personal attacks" Yes, as you did when you claimed the reason I don't share your viewpoint is that I *love* people less. Of course, this kind of insult comes so naturally to you -- arising from your deep-seated belief that you are morally superior to others -- that you didn't even recognize it as an insult.
Пікірлер: 369