In the first of two episodes on theonomy, Jon and Justin seek to generally define theonomy and then respond to it theologically. The guys consider a confessional understanding of the threefold division of the law, the distinction between moral and positive law, and 1689 Federalism as safeguards against theonomy.
Note: Semper Reformanda is included in today’s episode.
SUPPORT Theocast:
theocast.org/give/
JOIN Semper Reformanda:
theocast.org/sr/
FACEBOOK:
Theocast: / theocast.org
TWITTER:
Theocast: / theocast_org
Jon Moffitt: / jonmoffitt
Justin Perdue: / justin_perdue
INSTAGRAM:
Theocast: http: / theocast_org
RELATED VIDEOS & RESOURCES
1689 Baptist Perspective: Confessionalism and Theonomy: www.9marks.org/article/a-1689...
Why is Theonomy Unbiblical?: pastortomhicks.com/2020/11/17...
Is the Law Relevant Today?: • Is the Law Relevant To...
Covenant Theology: Introduction & Overview: • Covenant Theology: Int...
#theonomy #reformedtheology #lawgospel
Негізгі бет A Reformed Response to Theonomy | Theocast
Пікірлер: 260