Thank you both . Gavin and John in conversation - what's not to like . Blessings to you both .
@ksztyrix
Жыл бұрын
Feminism is great example of slippery slope
@SeyhawksNow
Жыл бұрын
Today's feminists need to ask themselves this: What's stronger? My love for women, or my hatred for men? They'll deny they feel hate, but it's there for everyone to see.
@robertmccabe8632
Жыл бұрын
The third wave (of feminism) is the ultimate form of indifference and nihilism. It seeks societies total compliance and in doing so kills the very society in totality. No family No children No morals. Nihilism of madness.
@Nothing_And-Nowhere
Жыл бұрын
At 14 I realize I'm more of a feminist than 3/4 of the self-proclaimed feminists (at least I know the history of the suffragettes, how women got rights and I'm for equality between all men and women)
@kayleneemery8217
11 ай бұрын
Spot on !
@someyoungguyjohnson7239
Жыл бұрын
I just wave back.
@mathewhale3581
Жыл бұрын
“Just smile and wave boys…smile and wave” - Skipper
@555Trout
Жыл бұрын
"Everyone" were not in favor of the vote. False.
@AggregateUser
Жыл бұрын
Can you elaborate
@555Trout
Жыл бұрын
@@AggregateUser Are you asking me because you know nothing of the actual history, or to make some some annoying political statement?
@fifthpint4571
Жыл бұрын
Most crucially, majority of women weee not in favour of voting rights for women. That’s because the price to pay for that was general draft. In the end, the women’s right to vote set a precedent for unearned privilege. Suffragettes were all upper / upper-middle class; working and lower-middle class women were staunchly against it. It was, at the heart, a class issue (and still is). Also, let’s not forget the campaign of terror enacted by Suffragettes. How many postmen were killed and maimed by postbox bombs? Looking at the way our society has literally rotted from the inside, I am not convinced granting women (again, unearned) voting rights was a smart move.
@555Trout
Жыл бұрын
@@fifthpint4571 💯
@dannysullivan3951
Жыл бұрын
@@fifthpint4571 Fear of women is hysterical.
@TimLambert101
Ай бұрын
The first place to give women the vote was the US territory of Wyoming in 1869. In 1893 New Zealand became the first country to give women the vote in national elections. The first Australian state to give women the vote was South Australia in 1894.
@danharrodian
Жыл бұрын
The other added advantage that 2nd wave brought was added tax revenues into state coffers as more women entered employment and tax revenues increased thereby increasing western national GDPs. What's not to like?
@Avianthro
Жыл бұрын
The key to understanding the process comes at around 0:16...technological progress...techs that reduced farm labor needs and led to more jobs available outside of the home-farm-homestead, jobs often better suited to females, or at least not so well-suited to men, and then there was birth control, and then there were household appliances. We humans keep "progressing" with technology, doing experiments whose full consequences we never foresee or even when we may foresee some that may be negative, we just brush them aside in the name of "progress" the promise of ever more "godlike" scientific-technological power-control. We are now (with AI and robotics and social-psych control techs) going way beyond just feminism and its undesired consequences and heading fully toward transforming humans into transhuman borg, heading even toward our own replacement/destruction by our beloved technological "progress".
@LoveQuestWithLisaConcepcion
8 ай бұрын
And transhumanism is next
@Avianthro
8 ай бұрын
@@LoveQuestWithLisaConcepcion That's right! That's the trajectory we're following, but maybe we'll be saved from that also by the trajectory we're following with failing to quickly-enough transition to earth-resource sustainable modern economics, or by a rebellion of the sub-elites against the elites followed by anarchy, and other possibilities as well. Transhumanistic borgification is where the elites want to take us but will basic economic conditions enable the process to reach completion and will the rest of us follow along?
@glennllewellyn7369
Жыл бұрын
Maybe the Amish have it right?!?
@zephyrr108
Жыл бұрын
Women have to be home and never CEOs.
@dannysullivan3951
Жыл бұрын
You're free to join them.
@sitka49
Жыл бұрын
Did know there is as much domestic abuse in Amish marriages as in secular marriages? People are people - You can take the tiger out jungle but you cant take the jungle out of the tiger. So no they don't have it figured out.
@PennySmart
Жыл бұрын
The 2 world wars had a considerable effect on women's work outside of the home.
@joejoejoejoejoejoe4391
Жыл бұрын
So has labour saving domestic appliances, the improvements in sanitation and healthcare (that has reduced childhood mortality) and birth control.
@reuvenpolonskiy2544
Жыл бұрын
Indeed wars bring nothing but distruction
@sitka49
Жыл бұрын
@@reuvenpolonskiy2544another side effect is is Discovery and innovation
@debrawehrly6900
2 ай бұрын
women have always worked, even before the industrial revolution. They worked on their farms, they produced goods and crafts to be sold in the cottage industry. And contrary to what people thought, during the medieval period, women did work...both inside the home and outside the home. They worked as blacksmiths, they made clothing, they worked on farms, they worked as seamstresses, and they also owned or were employed in bakeries and breweries. In fact, the art of making beer was considered a feminine enterprise.
@debrawehrly6900
2 ай бұрын
@@joejoejoejoejoejoe4391 interesting that those same modern appliances did not free Saudi women from domesticity or to pursue careers or other interests. The workforce did not open up to them until decades later.
@dannysullivan3951
Жыл бұрын
The Queen's Chaplain explaining feminism? Tune in tomorrow for Putin explaining the 1st amendment.
@scottyyoch3537
Жыл бұрын
Let us not forget that one of Elizabeth Cady Stanton s primary works Was re-writing the bible Primarily the law of Moses
@debrawehrly6900
2 ай бұрын
Thomas Jefferson re-wrote the Bible, but nobody talks about that
@bryanjones8778
2 ай бұрын
@@debrawehrly6900 Yes, they do.
@wendyfield7708
10 ай бұрын
Gender and sexuality are not the same thing. We need to listen both to scientists,AND leaders of the main religions on this. Also equality and sameness are not the same thing. I am equal to men in my eyes and God’s, but I am very different from men! However at nearly 90 I agree with my Suffragist vicar’s wife grandmother who had six children and knew she as a woman! +
@truthpanda1966
Жыл бұрын
I can give you a short history of feminism. 1. Lies 2. Lies 3. Lies
@ericomtavares
Жыл бұрын
Excellent interview. Really enjoy Dr Ashenden
@heikejohannajahns3257
2 ай бұрын
We have hyper-feminism today, as well as hyper-hedonism, hyper-individualism and hyper-capitalism. Too much of a good thing makes it toxic.
@YSLRD
Жыл бұрын
James 1:14-16 When lust ( for power) has conceived, it births sin. Sin, when it is full grown, brings death.
@bazzman7056
7 ай бұрын
SA Aust. 1894 BUT and wait for it NZ gave women the right to vote in 1893.
@rebeccat9389
6 ай бұрын
Lolllllllll
@pipnipipa7627mimmahappunchaol
Жыл бұрын
It is an big wave , thank you for tolerance of my learning; where racism originates and they use anger -of -men ,to attack their opponents or envy of feminism. Power of rebellious wrongful women . Also, they target mums and single women.
@No-nl8jn
Жыл бұрын
The vikings had i right. Look it up.
@richardt.buryan832
Жыл бұрын
"TRUE FEELINGS." NONSENSE.
@hitreset0291
Жыл бұрын
Why not just have men staying at home to raise the kids?
@YSLRD
Жыл бұрын
Because it defies nature and nature's God.
@leebacon-butler6130
Жыл бұрын
I think it's a bit silly to have a man's opinion of women without a woman's voice being included. I as a woman have walked the feminism road and the pioneering road in the ecclesia in a Biblical sense. Can confidently say both men and women need to appreciate each other and learn how to honor one another as Jesus said to. 😢
@ariaslamb7789
Жыл бұрын
Are women suitable for something other than this haha
@justchilling704
Жыл бұрын
@@leebacon-butler6130Unfortunately that doesn’t get any clicks and for some reason a lot of extremists get audiences and views then the balanced folks get called indecisive.
@Vishnuk-fe9iv
5 ай бұрын
@@justchilling704feminists themselves are sexists bigoted people.
@hjones4922
Жыл бұрын
Maybe a bloke's not the best person to ask to define feminism? 1- mischaracterises the waves: we're currently in fourth wave 2- there's a lot of disagreement within feminism about gender, just ask JK Rowling 3- first wave wasn't embraced all that quickly, women have the vote a long time in some countries but men had had the vote a lot longer, and men are still overrepresented at every level of the political system 4- unfair description of second wave: why shouldn't fathers look after their children if women work? 5- irrelevant description of "gender struggles". We're discussing society not couples falling in love. I'll leave it there for now...
@Tyrantstorm
Жыл бұрын
“here’s the history of feminism, from someone who is not a feminist”
@LoveQuestWithLisaConcepcion
8 ай бұрын
Hun wake up. Feminism is a PsyOp. Women are learning facts of how we were all manipulated and by whom. I suggest researching eugenics and Rockefeller
@wiseonwords
5 ай бұрын
@Tyrantstorm - He was a feminist.
@pandjblake547
Жыл бұрын
Why is he talking about feminism, particularly as his facts are all wrong? It certainly did not take a short time for women to achieve the vote - more like 90 years of campaigning and struggle in this country (the UK). I particularly take issue with everything he said about third wave feminism - what he describes is pure fantasy in his own head; moreover his "analysis" completely ignores the basic issue of power dynamics and imbalances inhererent in patriarchy. What gives him the right to pontificate publicly about something so important that he clearly knows nothing about. Why not get a woman to describe feminism?
Пікірлер: 81