This weapon speaks of the golden period. Flourishing with craftsmen, economic equality, rule of true law and order ,Talent was highly recognized and appreciated . Best Trainers , equipments and Renowned Manufacturer. The United Panjab.
@50calorie82
2 жыл бұрын
As Guru Sahib Sad “ Jaab laag Khalsa Rahe Niaara, tab lag taej dioon mein saara “ …….: whenever we have gone the other way , from the intended path of Guru Sahib , we have lost heavily .
@50calorie82
2 жыл бұрын
The real manufacturer is united Gurus Khalsa ….
@gurjotsingh8934
4 ай бұрын
Punjab was one of the most advanced civilizations of its time
@ahuman2482
Жыл бұрын
Ranjit Singh was considered by European high figures as “Napoleon of the East” and his Punjabi/Sikh kingdom and army were consisted the “Prussians of India” for their military acumen.
@DeepS555
4 жыл бұрын
Amazing ! Undoubtedly, Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s huge empire from Tibet to beyond Kabul was a Superpower of the Indian Subcontinent. Was a true Secular and Progressive leader way ahead of his time.
@Ap1hw
2 жыл бұрын
Secular? You remember the part where Sikhism is a religion not an ethnicity?
@ssm7593
2 жыл бұрын
Kabul?🤣 You never captured any part of Afghanistan
@jsksingh88
2 жыл бұрын
@@Ap1hw Secular means separation of Religion and State. Sikhism embraces the same under the principle of Miri -- Piri. Remember, Sikhs were a minority in Greater Punjab itself, employees of the State were positioned regardless of their religion. Just like in India today.
@Ap1hw
2 жыл бұрын
@@jsksingh88 yeah but I never said that? I said that Sikhism was a religion? Idiot
@harveykaler991
2 жыл бұрын
@@ssm7593 he held 2 victory parades in Kabul. When the Sikh army reached Pihar after defeating Afghan forces at Peshawar. The Sikh army received a letter of surrender from Dost Mohammad Khan. Accepting Sikh rule in Kabul. A treaty was signed giving Sikhs partial rule in Kabul plus annual tributes from Kabul.
@princeriar8085
5 жыл бұрын
It was time when Sikhs ruling the Punjab with their own army .
@tejpalsingh6619
4 жыл бұрын
prince riar it is only time Punjabis ruled punjab
@meetagill4242
4 жыл бұрын
Sikh real heroes 🌹❤️
@1991Happy13
5 жыл бұрын
sikh empire , sikh rule
@bhujangfauj9518
3 жыл бұрын
very informative
@royalhistoricalpanjab9501
3 жыл бұрын
Yaaro dekh lawo asi kitha aa Sikh koum da raaj c tey technology asi sada kolo world ch gayi kina picha ah gaya Han asi Sadi penchan ehna gallan ne menu janjhor k rakh dita aaa menu maan meri Sikhi pehschaan tey ma kesh dahdi rakh layi guru di fouj ch bharti howagey ik din ohdi mehar sadkay bki pls guys should need to go towards our Sikhi where our ancestors existed
@swarnraj2762
2 жыл бұрын
The narration seems to be outstanding.
@50calorie82
2 жыл бұрын
How we have been made to forget , we were Kings once , as Khalsa suppose to rule , as intended by our Guru not to be ruled .
@ranpreetful
4 жыл бұрын
Great information
@UKPHA
4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@ashokkher9551
2 жыл бұрын
My Regimental ancestors Bolay jo Nihal Sat shri Akal Waha Garu ji ka Khalsa Waha guruji ke Fareh
@gurpreetsinghbala5663
Жыл бұрын
Nice. Very informative
@mr.jingles9362
2 жыл бұрын
This is awesome. Please post more content like this.
@ranpreetful
5 жыл бұрын
Good information
@psingh2174
3 жыл бұрын
Where can I get this background music ??
@anidynamic
3 жыл бұрын
I am trying to find that too
@gaganbains1997
2 жыл бұрын
Once we were kings !
@navchohan988
5 жыл бұрын
May Sikh rule more time on Lahore and their territory will not annexed by British then genocide of 1947 ,84 may not happen in Sikh history BUT
@lordgawain
4 жыл бұрын
I feel the same! But God has his plans!
@bg-zj6td
3 жыл бұрын
Sikh Rule came to end ,_ due to the betrayed of DOGRAS._ After Maharaja Ranjeet Singh_ Dogras eyes were on this kingdom._ British were thinking to grab it too. _ Then Dogras made an agreement with the British _ that they will help them to win the last battle with Sikh Army. _ Dogras will pay for the war _ which they did. _ in return Dogras will get the territory of Kashmir Riasat. _ So Dogras payed 70 Thousands to British _ which was their expenses on this last War _ I think it's Mudki D War. _ Dogras provide all information to English_ deceived the Sikh Army._ Sikh Army was winning_ but Dogras cheated._ _ Urdu Poet Shah Mohammed Writes _ Shah Mohammeda Ek Sarkar Wajo Fojan Jit k Annt nu Harian ny. _ 1847 to 1857 _ 10 years of bloodshed of Ranjit Singh's family is very painful._ _ But for this Maharaja Ranjeet Singh was on fault. _ Yes he was a great Ruler._ but he was not a good father._ he gave more Importance to Dogras. It's a big history. Better please read Sikh History by good educated Writer. _ Similar was Iran's Shah ( King before Itula Kumanni _ founder of Islamic rule ) He established Pehalvi kingdom_Great Ruler. _ wanted to complete with west. Opened Universities._ Co_ education in University. _ look at the Iran of Pehalvi time._ you will shocked to see the difference with today. _ but he was not a good father. _ he brought up his son in luxury. _ son failed _ Iran also drowned. 🤸🤸
@RANJEETSINGH-tw8qx
3 жыл бұрын
A Son must be good to father...father is always good to son...get to history of Guru Sahib JI ...why Sri Sri Guru Nanak Dev JI given Guru Sahib Gaddi JI to Sri Guru Angad Dev JI...and the Last Guru Sahib JI Guru Gobind Singh JI is the Son of Sahib Sri Guru Tegbhadur JI. Its Dogra at that time were influenced by British had done wrong otherwise. ..the Sikh empire was very good for all...without any differences in Human Races...Waheguru JI
@bg-zj6td
3 жыл бұрын
I agree with you about the Dogra. But when you annalise the good and bad point of a historical character. You have to be honest. With time and history, not emotional. While you are emotional , can't do justice. Maharaja was very nice 👍. But he was having that vision, that his sons to be strong kings, should have that training. Next to his throne was putted the seat of Dogras 10year son. I forget the name. When you do a Theses for PhD, you have to be honest on all events and characters. More over, Some fathers are good, and sons not, then some Sons are good, and fathers not. Indian History, everyday happenings in life, you can see it. From the time of our knowledge we here ,son did this or that, what when old people were sons, they didn't treat their parents right. They're getting it back. JAWANI, doesn't listen. Same is that Daughter in law and boys don't care for parents, these days, girls look after parents. Don't forget that these girls are daughter in law of other family. They don't care for the boys parents. What is the conclusion, that we didn't have good teachings of family, society and we Parents fail to teach them values of relations. Before my mom time , girls were teached that their in law family is their family. But now we pin point every day in girls life. We ignore the daughter in law. It's our failure. We blame these days girls are more sincere to parents. Don't forget thay are daughter in laws of some other house.🙏
@ColoradoStreaming
2 жыл бұрын
@@bg-zj6td Its interesting to think that the Khalsa army literally had the British Army at the brink of surrender including their top leaders at Ferozeshah then Tej Singh threw the whole battle when he had the opportunity to sweep in with his units. Tej Singh literally cost the Sikhs everything that day and again when he destroyed the bridge at Sobraon.
@daddyjee5509
5 жыл бұрын
👌
@prakashghumaliya2002
4 жыл бұрын
👏👏👏👏💐💐💐
@Papa-ur3ju
3 жыл бұрын
sikhs were most modern in Indian sub continent , they got British,austrian, french and dutch generals in army and kind of secular also kind of atheist and also they were in minority
@Papa-ur3ju
3 жыл бұрын
btw there are some drawback to sikh empire like sikh guru every time oppose cast system but every sikh except radicals sikh and warrior sikhs, follow cast system similar to hindu cast system and there was radical sikh group name damdami taksal and akal takht they had large influence on maharaja Ranjit Singh but many times conflict happened between both sides but they never full ambush each other as they know it completely unstable the empire and both will loss power what they got to British
@garryj7845
3 ай бұрын
Sikhs have nothing to do with India. India did not exist before 1947. Punjab was/is a separate country.
@catharperfect7036
2 жыл бұрын
The word for that is "mortar", not "cruise missile".
@kuljitsingh6749
2 жыл бұрын
Sikhs are born fighters and the hero's in the world👌👍❤️🙏Maharaja Ranjit Singh the best and most successful emperor in the world 👌👍❤️ Today the India needs sikh rule 👌👍❤️
@digvijayshekhawat5286
2 жыл бұрын
The Jaiwan canon of Jaipur rulers had a range of 28km at that time. The longest in the world of that era
@sehajsingh1533
Жыл бұрын
did the mughals gift it to them in exchange for rajput women? Always making everything into a competition, weaklings singing their own praises then, weaklings singing their own praises now
@garryj7845
3 ай бұрын
@@sehajsingh1533these indians are everywhere these days. They have destroyed internet.
@prakashghumaliya2002
4 жыл бұрын
Jai hind
@shobinamushtaq9300
3 жыл бұрын
There was no hind named stupidity at that time... Khalsa Raj
@prakashghumaliya2002
3 жыл бұрын
@@shobinamushtaq9300 Jai Hind means Victory To Mother India and Its People and the Sikhs Are bravest sons of Mother India Jai Hind
@jhardy1452
2 жыл бұрын
@@prakashghumaliya2002 Sikhs will never forget 1984 and will teach our future generations about the treachery of the Indian state and seize any opportunity for our own homeland . Khalistan Zindabad !
@50calorie82
2 жыл бұрын
@@prakashghumaliya2002 We Sikhs have not signed Indian constitution in 1950, we refused to sign it . It was and is full of broken promises to Sikhs . It is Khalsa Raaj .
@garryj7845
3 ай бұрын
What a dumb and hateful comment this hindu has made on this video
@Keeree75
2 жыл бұрын
Its not PUNJAB its PANJAB and it's not PUNJABI it's PANJABI.
@ahuman2482
Жыл бұрын
It’s actually Panjaab. panj (five) aab (water)
@jts1234
4 жыл бұрын
sikh lost every thing so sad in 1839
@bobsingh5521
2 жыл бұрын
1849
@devindersingh6446
2 жыл бұрын
Good but wrong narrative being forwarded. There never had been Sikh Empire. It was Sirkar e Khalsa, that is, government of the former Khalsa subjects of the Mughals as free Khalsa. The British take pride as the annihilator of the empires, thus the deliberate change in the nomenclature.
@vickysingh3028
Жыл бұрын
Teach them about divide and rule policy ..and the jallianwala bagh incident also.. how u bought lal singh pm of sarkar e khalsa (sikh empire)nd tez singh and gulab singh dogra ...not even a single act done by britishers in india or in sikh empire was righteous .every british act was inhumane nd traitorous ..u won but still u lost bcz that battle wins were achieved by perfidy
Пікірлер: 69