From what understand, the energy output exceeding the the input only calculates the energy used to run the generator, not all the other systems running the generator. So it is still a a significant net loss, energy wise.
@Crouton_6
9 ай бұрын
It says in the video, it put out more energy than it used. It created more energy than it used to run the entire thing.
@latiosss9751
9 ай бұрын
@@Crouton_6worng
@latiosss9751
9 ай бұрын
It is like what the comment said
@henrytjernlund
Жыл бұрын
This video has lots of misinformation. AI was NOT involved in it's design, which was back in the 1990s. It was human coded simulations. Not AI as we think of it today. Now the control system could involve AI but that is different. Also W7X is a plasma control experiment. It does not use DT fuel, but only deuterium. Tritium is hazardous and the experiment is not built to handle it. Thus it's not producing energy. It's just testing plasma control. Each of the different reactor designs have tradeoffs. So it's worthwhile exploring multiple designs. W7X is the largest and most optimized of it's type. It has gone through some upgrades and will likely go through more. A better report on the results of it's progress should be coming in the next couple months. So again, this video is not very good.
@mcombatti
Жыл бұрын
1.8 gigawatts! 😮 we only need 1.21 to travel thru time according to doc 😅
@gamerelite3989
10 ай бұрын
made me laugh bud just fyi if you were curious enough like i did a while back 1.3 gigajoules as stated in the video is 0.36 MWh a nice feat onto itself for experimental :)
@Nantorias
10 ай бұрын
Dang, exciting stuff! I believe 13% will be the next milestone and it will happen within 10-15 years. Technology today is growing at an advanced rate and with the aid of contained AI it can grow further. It is but one step closer to stopping pollution and the destruction of our environment, but it is a very big step.
@valuebasedbusinessbyanders3709
Жыл бұрын
I am still surprised that the EXTREME lack of fuel for fusion (Tritium) is not higher up on the agenda, we have 12 kg of Tritium IN THE WHOLE WORLD, and it has a half-life of only 12 years. Yes, some Tritium can be produced in the 'blankets' around a fusion reactor, but what about waste and inefficiencies in collecting it...???
@patrickday4206
10 ай бұрын
Why do you think we are suddenly going back to the moon helium 3. We already use nuclear reactors to make tritium for nuclear weapons inefficiently which is why the department of energy is in love with the fusion reaction recently hoping to gain better understanding to find alternatives and or conceivably make it using fusion
@valuebasedbusinessbyanders3709
10 ай бұрын
@@patrickday4206 He-3 will cost some $30 million per kg to mine on the Moon, but the worst part is that any fusion using He-3 will require temperatures of 1,000 million degrees Kelvin (compared to ‘only’ 100 million with Deuterium-Tritium). It is POSSIBLE to make Tritium in parallel in a fusion reactor, but unless you have EXTREMELY high efficiency, you will not make enough to be self-sustaining. Today, in the old fission reactors, the Tritium produced (a few kg per year world-wide) costs $30,000 per GRAM. In conclusion, I think we will ditch fusion and go back to fission in the net 50 years. That is MY prediction.
@CarlosOddone-z6k
10 ай бұрын
a few countries have it not " we have "
@anders1196
10 ай бұрын
@@CarlosOddone-z6k Don't know what you are referring to, or what it means. Any country can have nuclear power, some insist on spending 'too much' on fusion, without any significant benefits in the end. Nobody can be SURE we will be able to make fusion work, whereas fission has worked for 70 years and is still doing fine. New small reactors are 'cheap' and affordable. And to be clear, fusion only generates 4 times more energy per kg of fuel, so it is not some 'miracle energy form'.
@valuebasedbusinessbyanders3709
10 ай бұрын
@@CarlosOddone-z6k ...what he said (my other 'handle')
@moonlander03
10 ай бұрын
It used to last for milliseconds .. so after watching this video will see the improvements 😎😎😎😎
@The.Futurist
Жыл бұрын
NVIDIA´s NEW AI Chip Breakthrough Changes the Future of AI! kzitem.info/news/bejne/tZ5m1IN3hH95YKw
@Funnyfresh420
10 ай бұрын
i mean... maybe destroy oil and gas POWER production... but we still need them in much larger volume for many other things.
@pineapplepen1530
10 ай бұрын
"Multiple countries in France." Lol
@ItatsuMagnatsa
9 ай бұрын
And another 500 years and we'll be as Advanced as the Humans from Halo.
@andrewcliffe4753
11 ай бұрын
Quick easy builds will win the race because the game is moving so fast now
@starlinvander103
9 ай бұрын
the titanic was impossible to sink. and here we are.
@lustersplash
9 ай бұрын
speaking of ai. i think this script is ai with how often the same words are repeated
@Biketunerfy
Жыл бұрын
Fusion energy production is at least 60 to 100 years away at the earliest. They say it’s 30 to 50 years away to produce stabilised fusion plasma energy streams but as we can see as soon as you put something in the plasma it cools down and fusion stops. If they manage to get stable fusion plasma and get 1.5 to 2 units more energy than they put in then it’s going to be another 30 to 50 years to design a power plant to produce electricity so we won’t see the world running on fusion technology in our lifetime and that’s sad. It’s probably another 2 or 3 generations away and that’s a BIG IF. My great niece has just been born and she won’t get to see fusion and that breaks my heart but her kids might toward the end of their life span.
@migBdk
11 ай бұрын
Right, but we got advanced fission reactors instead. Many of the same advantages and MUCH closer to market than fusion. Expect functioning commercial plants before 2030. Molten Salt Reactors and High Temperature gas cooled reactors and Liquid Metal Reactors
@Biketunerfy
11 ай бұрын
@@migBdk yeah we are having SMN (small modular) nuclear reactors that are by far safer then big PW (pressurised water) nuclear reactors. The good thing about them is when they run out of fuel you just plug in a new reactor and dispose of the old one in a repository. You can add as many as you need to and the good thing about them is you can keep them close to cities like 20 plus miles away and this eliminates a lot of electrical seepage and way less resistance due to less cable for the electricity to go through and this means it’s more efficient and cheaper and less energy is needed. The safety is way more safer than huge pressurised water reactors because there’s no coolant to worry about and if there a power cut or an accident man made or natural the control rods are kept open by electromagnets as soon as they loose power the rods drop and stop the reaction, no risk of a melt down, no coolant pumps which are always the cause of a melt down to worry about. There will be a heat exchange with water to convert it into steam for the steam turbine though but not to cool the reactors because they rely only on heat shielding not pumps that can fail and cause a melt down. This is what the U.K. is doing and Rolls Royce has already started building them for testing. I’m not sure if it’s a molten salt or a conventional uranium oxide reactor though.
@migBdk
11 ай бұрын
@@Biketunerfy the Rolls Royce new reactor is a traditional light water cooled uranium reactor, just scaled down. The SMR (Small Modular Reactor) is already a step in the right direction and will bring prices and build times down. Molten Salt Reactors will bring prices way down.
@Biketunerfy
11 ай бұрын
@@migBdk SMRs will be much better technology way safer and cheaper easier to construct and maintain to bring down energy prices. I’m just sad we will never see fusion plants up and running in our lifetime or even crack stabile fusion energy for that matter and my children probably won’t either but their children might but we have to do this, we need clean reliable energy that’s powerful, fusion is that energy to secure our future for our children.
@patrickday4206
10 ай бұрын
With AI we might see fusion sooner than you think if proven commercially viable it could be driven fast especially if AI helps us with room temperature superconductors
@Spaghetti_policy
Жыл бұрын
Let’s go!! Git’er Done!!!
@wmgthilgen
9 ай бұрын
Energy today, regardless of the type is today as it was during all of the yesterday's; FREE! It's the total intrastructor's which allow's one to utilize it that we pay for, not the energy itself. A gazillion dollar designed, built, etc. etc. etc. Has to be repaid, and those who invested the gazillion's demand a high return on their investment's. One can discover and utilize an engergy type totally free. But then they have to pay various fee's to various government agencies, and or mandated to stop, when the local, city, state, federal code's are not being complied with.
@PhillyHardy
6 ай бұрын
Seems like a partial spinner shape,
@tommygrngo
10 ай бұрын
as long as ai remains only a tool not used against us
@madtscientist8853
Жыл бұрын
See what you didn't say was how much energy was put into that system to get The 1.3 giga jewels out for 8 MINUTES. If you have to put 100 GIGA JEWELS in just to get 1.3 giga jewels out It's really not worth it. So you're really still 60 years away.
@spearshaker7974
9 ай бұрын
We need an hourglass ⌛️ shape to turn that doughnut 🍩 shape into a weapon.
@milekragulj325
Жыл бұрын
What are you thinking.
@DarkLineSnes
10 ай бұрын
how is it unlimited if gas and oil is limited?
@ioanbota9397
Жыл бұрын
Its interestyng
@The.Futurist
Жыл бұрын
Yes the current development is very interesting
@protasiocanalita6436
Жыл бұрын
Can it be used for airlines. Military aircraft, space explorations? The aircraft gas is truly the safest propellant that is safe to use tight now. They have to prove it ASAP.
@CarlosOddone-z6k
11 ай бұрын
sit tight for another 3 times 40 years
@nin1ten1do
9 ай бұрын
no stealator will never work..
@jimtwisted1984
10 ай бұрын
So was it ai or a supercomputer?
@randallporter1404
9 ай бұрын
6:45 If you believe China's claims... and I don't.
@88Superphysics88
Ай бұрын
Когда сделают действующ й коммерческий термоядерный реактор? Никогда?
@Teimur1
9 ай бұрын
AI (the way it is today) can only design things according to how it was programmed. So this wont work in real life.
@Fyou0034
9 ай бұрын
How come, they give all this knowledge to a computer and then then I don’t even give out all that knowledge to their own kind human beings in other words I would love to learn everything and anything that is always been my dream
@nickplays2022
Жыл бұрын
Still with an American-made AI
@maistooo
Жыл бұрын
American is not a real identity as it's a nation made of immigrants.
@MikeBroderick-m6e
9 ай бұрын
i feel stupider listening to this first iter is pronoced e ter second the reactor is at 10,000,00 degrees and the plasma con not ever touch the wall because it will burn the unit the wall do become radio active buit it takes alot of time and iter if work will become self suffient
@moltoniron633
10 ай бұрын
Total waste of energy time and resources. If it were to invested in fast breeder reactor and seawater Uranium extraction technology,we would have unlimited amount of nuclear fission power with both uranium and thorium.
@homayounshirazi9550
Жыл бұрын
HUMANITY WILL DESTROY ITSELF EVENTUALLY, ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
@theviolentendofitall
Жыл бұрын
It’s what we’re destined to do it seems… It’s almost as if Mother Nature isn’t a big enough threat to life already…
@paulruprai1274
9 ай бұрын
Has anyone actually got a net energy gain fopr more than 10minutes? Well ? These people arenot physicists . ..all you need is a catalyst particle / particle to lower the temperature by 1000x,.,..
@MiguelMejia-wd5cd
Жыл бұрын
You need to have it proof in real life like cryptocurrency mining it works it even came out on the news but remain quiet and no mention after that. And first you need to sustain and transfer to if you want a facility it will cost you billions and hundreds of billions but if you are able to hold the energy to the ???? I can't give you that but this is a way that it's. Cost is 0 it's all around us.
@u2ooberboober
11 ай бұрын
Fusion is here. Just put solar panels around the Sun…
@williamhepfer8956
11 ай бұрын
Okay go ahead.
@patrickday4206
10 ай бұрын
That's called a Dyson sphere 😂
@u2ooberboober
10 ай бұрын
@@patrickday4206 That damn Dyson figured it out huh?! Went from vacuum cleaners to energy production??
@patrickday4206
10 ай бұрын
@@u2ooberboober I hope you're kidding
@evitoonbundit2453
Жыл бұрын
That US "breaktrough" compared laser energy in with energy (heat) out, but ignored the dreadfully low efficiency of lasers so actually the overall efficiency was about 1%.
@JayTayPlay
10 ай бұрын
but it was still the first to achieve a positive total energy output
@jancizuletek670
10 ай бұрын
hey is there a paper on this somewhere?
@JayTayPlay
10 ай бұрын
@@jancizuletek670 yes but you wouldn’t even need the actual paper, it was breaking news around the world because it was the first to get more energy out than it put in just like 6 months ago
@Joseph-ri8qk
9 ай бұрын
yes and no, people get really confused about this as scientists are in fact not infinite money wells and the lasers are not top of the line. They had to be smart and crafty with what they could get and they did a hell of a job. It is also of note that tech has and seems it will continue to become better, whether that be in efficiency or power, ANY advancement in fusion is massive and this breakthrough is simply something that has never happened. Side thought, if your really coming from the 'US is trying to lie' perspective then I don't think I can convince you but no they are not lying by smudge the numbers, pretty much every fusion facility use the same standards for if it's producing energy so everyone is talking about the same thing.
@JayTayPlay
9 ай бұрын
@@Ryloh you're refering to FISSION not FUSION, two differnt things, and actually, they're exact opisites.
@user-tx9zg5mz5p
Жыл бұрын
Now, only another 30 yrs away😂
@The.Futurist
Жыл бұрын
Always „only“ 30 years 😂
@The_Questionaut
Жыл бұрын
I have a feeling it may be sooner
@user-tx9zg5mz5p
Жыл бұрын
@@The_Questionaut 👌😂
@slo3337
Жыл бұрын
That was 30 years ago, now it's 29
@axelpalfy7597
Жыл бұрын
@@slo3337 65 years ago
@migBdk
Жыл бұрын
To everyone waiting for fusion energy: The LiFTR (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor) have all of the upsides that fusion has. Plenty of available fuel. Only produce short lived isotopes. Stort safe. And it is very close to market, several companies expect mass production before 2030 (not prototypes, commercial units!) A MSR (Molten Salt Reactor) running on uranium or recycled nuclear waste have many of the same advantages, and are even closer to market. Get hyped!
@elsonck2523
Жыл бұрын
China is investing $440bn into MSRs nuclear power plants and intends to build 30 plants by 2030. (see The Futurist video Nuclear 4.0...China)
@Baronstone
Жыл бұрын
No, the cost to move LFTR from where the research stands to a functional commercial reactor would cost more than $15 billion in funding
@miketarbert4609
11 ай бұрын
ITS ABOUT TIME.
@brentdobson5264
11 ай бұрын
@@b3owu1f Scenario : Quantum Super Intelligence obsoletes yesterday's vested monetary encryption system accesses all data for rehabilitation analysis to grounded public prosocial Real Economy * ....non toxic energy unit accounting engineering sense . Egoless logical objective " artifical " pure principle Intelligence supplying direction to rehabilitation of yesterday's vested " special " small " i " intelligence becomes a thing within global citizen stockholders commonwealth . eg. * " Critical Path " ( just the introduction eg. ) ....by Richard Buckminster Fuller ( Institute ) .
@andreoliver5927
11 ай бұрын
I agree. Thorium is also the perfect power source for deep space craft. Fusion has a lot of problems, unless it's in a star. LOL
@MrZoomZone
10 ай бұрын
BS detector is working overtime here. Even if the plasma can be contained it has to be kept away from the sides of the twisted torus enough to avoid cooking it .... yet at the same time the heat it produces has to be efficiently harvested. It's not like you can line the inner walls of the twisted torus with pipes to both control and harvest the heat because you need the heat to sustain the fusion but you need to extract the excess heat produced when fusion is attained. Either there is a conflict of interest or a fine line between sustained operation and thermal run-a-way. Good luck with this money pit. Many are sufficiently impressed by the science-drama. There are better intermediate fission technologies to sink your money into people. Wake up.
@donjerson
10 ай бұрын
Few understand this
@kyleb3754
7 ай бұрын
No Codes Were Cracked, kids.... this is just clickbait
@edwardevans7219
Жыл бұрын
YES IT IS CALLED A STELLARATOR , I PROBABLY SPELLED IT WRONG. WE WOULD HAVE HAD WORKING FUDION BY NOW IF THIS DESIGN HAD BEEN ADOPTED 50 YEARS AGO WHEN IT WAS INVENTED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@visheshgupta1667
4 ай бұрын
Scientists working on ITER themselves say that we wouldn't achieve fusion before 2040. Also fusion wouldn't destroy oil and gas, as they have many more uses other than for energy production
@MG-yg9sp
Жыл бұрын
The headline is total clickbait and nonsense. We will not see fusion energy for decades
@russellk.bonney8534
Жыл бұрын
Never is the correct word. Physics denies the possibility.
@Mr.JohanusWilliams
Ай бұрын
Overall efficiency is abysmal! Still decades away if at all! Basically propaganda promoting an industry lie (and creating clickbait).
@geraldjunior4235
Жыл бұрын
🛡️I Do Knowledge Understanding of blueprint of how it looks I vision it .🤓 That More particles from the nuclear fusion . Chain in a DNA 🧬 Highly recommended 🙏🛡️
@ManyHeavens42
11 ай бұрын
Who's to say Maybe this is the New flux capacitor.Super Highway here we Come.
@SusannaSaunders
9 ай бұрын
1:35 I hate to be 'that guy' but it does produce nuclear waste as the reactor casing becomes radioactive during use. Granted this is not a direct waste product but it should be made clear, there is nuclear contaminated waste.
@Tony-hs8mu
Жыл бұрын
The facts are about results of all the probabilities, and management. AI should be used as a mid level manager as critical fast acting components. It is more likely to be the keys help, maintain a constant field of operation.
@brian.louis107
7 ай бұрын
It seems like a giant waste of time and resources when we could be researching simpler means of energy.
@glynnec2008
Жыл бұрын
Don't spread the propaganda that fusion reactors don't create radioactive waste. D-T fusion produces neutrons, just like "dirty old fission" does. Worse, the T in D-T fusion stands for Tritium, which is an extremely expensive, artificially made, highly radioactive substance. Tritium is worse than the spent fuel from fission reactors because Tritium is a gas. Besides being an inhalation hazard, it reacts with oxygen to make radioactive water, which will efficiently contaminate EVERYTHING in the local environment. Fusion does not equal non-radioactive.
@patrickgrolemund545
11 ай бұрын
Everything you have said is garbage. Obviously you have never looked at the atomic chemistry or have the slightest idea about the science. Tritium is heavy hydrogen but still a very light gas. It dissipates quickly. And neutron radiation is very manageable though engineered safety measures. Neutron radiation doesn’t leave radiation behind from its interactions with normal matter. Neutron radiation or any radiation doesn’t stick around if the source doesn’t stick around. In a fusion reactor it’s 100% used with the only waste as normal helium.
@tinkerduck1373
11 ай бұрын
The activated surfaces from fusion reactors can be re-used in 100- 200 years, which is nothing compared to fission waste.
@antonywagner8079
9 ай бұрын
fusion is another 15 years away . again :D lol
@joseveintegenario-nisu1928
9 ай бұрын
China had a picture of their Fusion Energy machine, a bit smaller than other, it looks as a huge size pressure cooker, with a man holding in hand a thick cable with a plug. Message, not very 'subliminal', was the Chinese Fusion Reactor is ready to supply power to the grid. So, What? Blessings +
@retr0.1337
11 ай бұрын
Guys haven't really figure out the concept of free energy at all by powering this shit that isn't able to provide enough electricity to power it self...
@imstevemcqueen
Жыл бұрын
The fact they keep building the one that has a known defective operating problem speaks volumes
@The_Questionaut
Жыл бұрын
do you have better alternatives?
@adamiskandar5107
Жыл бұрын
@@The_Questionaut Check out the Chinese one!
@GrugBug-f7j
Жыл бұрын
It's a research reactor. It is for gaining practical knowledge not power generation.
@patrickday4206
10 ай бұрын
We don't have any reactors that aren't just research 😂
@little_lord_tam
9 ай бұрын
This isnt a prototype, its a test bed
@senortroncoso1898
Жыл бұрын
Bla, bla, bla, bla, bla....
@russellk.bonney8534
Жыл бұрын
It's impossible with Earth gravity.
@robertweekes5783
9 ай бұрын
Fusion research is finding out how many ways you can waste millions of dollars 😂 Just support new fission #Thorium 💡
@johngalt7382
9 ай бұрын
Still neutron emissive and radioactive. I don't think anyone reading this will see fusion harnessed practically and commercially in their lifetimes.
@FrostSoul-qs6kq
9 ай бұрын
and this shit almost never gets used to help the common folk so keep it off my YT recommendations ... insipid algorithm .
@Yetipfote
Жыл бұрын
Say you are doing something with AI and investors will pay you 10x more.
@shiva.chennai
Жыл бұрын
Where did we obtain the fusion fuel helium-3? It's exceedingly rare on Earth, yet abundant on the lunar surface. All that's required is a fusion reactor. By sending a cargo spacecraft to the Moon and gathering 2 tons of helium-3, the cost would amount to 300 million US dollars per trip for India. With these 2 tons of helium-3, India could generate electricity for the entire country for one year. Interestingly, India's annual electricity earnings amount to $810 billion, so adopting nuclear fusion with helium-3 would lead to savings of $800 billion. This prompts the start of another space race.... India can settle the world bank debt 600 billon dollars in 3 years.
@russellk.bonney8534
Жыл бұрын
First, how much energy did that moon excursion use. You have to include all the planning, all energy consumed in human actions including costs to get to work and back. If the sum gets close to zero remember that some energy costs have been forgotten.
@Baronstone
Жыл бұрын
Helium 3 is not fusion fuel, Deuterium is. Also you would have to scrap off the top meter of the moons surface and process it to extract the Helium-3
@Supernumerary
11 ай бұрын
The shape of the gas flow path is a Mobius Strip, which has been around for a long time. Not invented by AI.
@CarlosOddone-z6k
11 ай бұрын
@@russellk.bonney8534 first he should work on an electric wheelbarrow
@patrickday4206
10 ай бұрын
Helium 3 is a fusion fuel and the Polywell Fusion is an interesting way of using it
@guai9632
10 ай бұрын
and yet another explanation of what fusion is. do you really think you audience doesn't know that already?
@Joepipsquiggle
10 ай бұрын
WHAT ABOUT THE PROBLEM OF NEUTRON BOMBARDMENT AND DESTRUCTION OF THE FUSION FACILITIES FROM THE NEUTRON RADIATION????
@KoxKoliabis
9 ай бұрын
Old news, AI made content with 0 new information. 7 minutes of my life wasted.
@Chazinthius
11 ай бұрын
“To destroy oil and gas” damn. It makes this seem verrrrey un credible.
@JALA578
9 ай бұрын
It won't destroy oil all modern technology requires oil as a lubricant, or as a material.
@planktonfun1
9 ай бұрын
That's cool and all, but how do you stop oil companies from assassinating you?
@samuelsonesteves4508
9 ай бұрын
This video is pure click bait, I want my 7 minutes back !!!
@jtdelagardelle
9 ай бұрын
What's taking so long Tony stark built it in a cave with a bunch of scraps
@christopherwhitley9923
11 ай бұрын
Yeah and vortex based mathematics is "pseudoscience." Sure....
@cliptracer8980
10 ай бұрын
When you make a promos of a new thing by misrepresentation of a past failed promise. You instantly get an f in my class. Even if what you want to show that is new is working and does what you suggest. The lasers making a pellet explode to make power lied directly. Power results was not of the whole system, but of the laser power density. Zoom out and you see the huge issue. 3%, not 50. I will watch more, but you aren’t credible yet in my eyes already.
@cliptracer8980
10 ай бұрын
No wast? It sprays out neutrons that damage the reactor. You reference the net energy gain again which was false. I’m not trusting you. Removing from history. The is 10 seconds of maybe valid info here. They still don’t use sound to control the neutrons so fail. Goodbye.
@PhillyHardy
6 ай бұрын
U know why I don’t like ai, I wish I have had the opportunity to work on this
@mikepowell8611
9 ай бұрын
Develop fusion until blue in face, won't get rid of oil and gas.
@UQRXD
4 ай бұрын
Will it use stored nuclear waste? Is that why all the plants kept it?
@lophiz1945
11 ай бұрын
This breakthrough advanced fusion by a decade! Now it's only 50 years aways. Ha Ha Ha.
@joseveintegenario-nisu1928
9 ай бұрын
Plasma in Stellarator: A Moebius band, ha,ha,ha!
@yodaz101
Жыл бұрын
Believe it when I see it... Been waiting for 60 years....total BS.
@stanmitchell3375
11 ай бұрын
Stupid idea,,it might be useful for interstellar travel
@terranceapel812
11 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@aaroncarpenter8451
10 ай бұрын
you think we cant use water instead of oil it has been inertial to hide this
@rodbihari8799
9 ай бұрын
AI didnt crack anything. AI cant even have a sensible conversation. Fusion is a dream at the moment. TRUTH a few megawatts in, a few megawatts out and 400 megawatts worth of laser to make it happen
@Kenny-tl7ir
6 ай бұрын
What’s your solution then Genius?
@rodbihari8799
6 ай бұрын
what ? My solution to fusion ? Thats a stupid question. But until we can manipulate gravity, we wont profit from fusion.@@Kenny-tl7ir
@Lemurai
Жыл бұрын
Figuring out gots design🤔 only step 50,000 of infinity.
@raph151515
Жыл бұрын
bot video
@danielgagne2871
Жыл бұрын
There one trillion spent around world n can not light a bulb.
@MrGiovannisassano
9 ай бұрын
Their makeing it into a ring when everything wants to be a ball
@TylerRayMattersRUAC
10 ай бұрын
Creating A Neutron Star You get a box with solid hydrogen and add a large amount of solid oxygen. You fill this with gas oxygen. And explode it with fire. You can only contain this star in a vacuum. You feed it with hydrogen to make it grow. It produces nitrogen. You feed it nitrogen or salt to make it shrink. This will vacuum what it's in and able to stand opening awhile. This is a good non-artificial light source.
@HowardSupra
9 ай бұрын
Crazy to think about but realistically AI is still hampered by human's. We can only ask it to do things we think of. There's probably so many questions that we don't even know to ask to begin with.
@billtalent1
9 ай бұрын
For AI to not be hampered by humans, you would have to create an AGI that can essentially act as an independent lifeform. That includes it having the ability to derive subjective meaning from it's own experiences.
@UltraK420
9 ай бұрын
This is already happening. Generative AI is the current phase leading to the next phases that will eventually become AGI. OpenAI is alleged to have already achieved AGI in secret but they will not openly admit this right now since it's quite a serious deal that could change everything so fast our heads would actually spin.@@billtalent1
@jacksdunklemarchen7180
9 ай бұрын
dafür das unser land so im arsch ist ist es ein wunder das wir das hin bekommen . als würde iron men sein super anzug in einer höle basteln
@madtscientist8853
9 ай бұрын
You know you can take a 1F capacitor and 1H coil and pulse it at 1V 6.3S and it will give you 20 volts at 20 amps you just have to know where to put the GROUND hit it is not on the NEGATIVE side.
@altaris6593
Жыл бұрын
How to turn it off when gets self-sustainable? I dosent have a controll rods or being submerged in water or any cooling liquid- then how to turn off a mini- sun? Blasting it with liquid nitrogen?
@russellk.bonney8534
11 ай бұрын
It turns itself off due to losses. It can never be +1 for longer than I take to have a good fart. Fortunately for all concerned, that's not very long.
@patrickday4206
10 ай бұрын
If you had a giant version that you didn't just want to drop the containment field there are many things that could be put in just like rods in nuclear reactors
@FlamingRobzilla
10 ай бұрын
One question: How can you measure 1 mg of hydrogen gas when it's lighter than air? Please be specific. Are you talking about liquid hydrogen or what?
@philliprobinson7724
10 ай бұрын
Hi. Videos about the coming of nuclear fusion remind me of the musical "Little orphan Annie", where she sings, "tomorrow, tomorrow, I can't wait until tomorrow, it's only a day away". Cheers, P.R.
@Rayzo45
Жыл бұрын
I hope to meet Doremon after 30 years have passed
@pepetrueno8228
10 ай бұрын
Hey Tony, the Germans stole your generator
@MikeBroderick-m6e
9 ай бұрын
i feel stupider just listening to this first iter
@KartikPatel-nt4ff
10 ай бұрын
😅😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅
@itachiplaygames9820
9 ай бұрын
der reaktor erinnert mich an terminator wo der eine Terminator zurück in die zeit gereißt ist
Пікірлер: 297