Source? for me this is BS and it is the last time i will click on anything FLIG AVIA
@skoodledoo
2 ай бұрын
Clickbait! There is no A390 in the works. Airbus already have a rival to 777x - it's called the A350.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment ❤
@Airstrike_dababy
2 ай бұрын
Bruh bruh he's literally write and ur like thx for the comment. What a npc. Well Airbus could just make a bigger a350 and maybe call it the a390 but the a350 is the perfect size yeah I don't think 2e need a bigger varient
@Recoverlerbotines
2 ай бұрын
Brow hating and he’s like thx for hating💀💀💀💀💀💀
@TrainDdorf
10 күн бұрын
But the A350 is worse
@Airstrike_dababy
10 күн бұрын
@@TrainDdorf you get ur a** outta here
@LiLo-ci3sl
2 ай бұрын
Stupid clickbait... Really man?
@RaquelHBurbidge
2 ай бұрын
Boeing has a lot of catching up to do if they want to compete with the A350.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@MasunPretious
2 ай бұрын
The A350's advanced technology is what makes it stand out.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️✈️
@SergeiJag
2 ай бұрын
It’s impressive how Airbus has already delivered over 600 A350s.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
Yeah thanks for your feedback
@BrienEssa
2 ай бұрын
Airbus’s use of composite materials was a smart move.
@Recoverlerbotines
2 ай бұрын
Boeing is also using them on 787 and 777X wings
@CamillaAbdul
2 ай бұрын
The A350’s efficiency is a big win for airlines looking to cut costs.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
Yeah 🛫🛫🛫
@BotrosMillom
2 ай бұрын
The A350’s cargo capability is a significant plus for airlines.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
That’s right
@SnurX
2 ай бұрын
Followed your channel but I can’t stand the clickbait anymore.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
✈️
@skirolf
2 ай бұрын
Who is shocked? The videomaker?
@IssaKalirs
2 ай бұрын
Boeing’s delay with the 777X has given Airbus a huge advantage.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
Thanks for feedback
@AlfCalson
2 ай бұрын
. 0:20 . A390 Three stories?
@chrisweavers903
2 ай бұрын
More nonsense from this channel 30 seconds was enough
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️
@AlfCalson
2 ай бұрын
✈️
@roseroy183
20 күн бұрын
The A3100 has 6 uppercut deck
@Airstrike_dababy
2 ай бұрын
Pretty sure this is bullshi but not completely cuz this is kind off what Airbus is going to do in the future like environmentally friendly engines
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️ thanks for your feedback
@LeondeLure
2 ай бұрын
Conneries!
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
✈️
@elbuggo
2 ай бұрын
When the plane is using less fuel, there will be more planes, and the total consumption of fuel will increase.
@CrownRider
2 ай бұрын
The amount of fuel, per mile or kilometer, per passenger is much more interesting.
@elbuggo
2 ай бұрын
@@CrownRider When the fuel consumption per seat is decreased, you will increase used seats and will need more planes. And those planes will use more fuel than was used before the fuel improvement. Is it that hard to grasp this?
@CrownRider
2 ай бұрын
@@elbuggo No, it's not hard to grasp. Just a different way of looking at it. Don't you see that?
@johnchristmas7522
2 ай бұрын
Incorrect, more planes come about with more passengers, hence the original A380 (one aircraft instead of two) plus customers drive the aircraft demand on how they fly and where to. Airlines buy as less Aircraft as possible. They are hugely expensive. They only make a profit while in the air-not on the ground. Fuel is changing too, many new aircraft will be flying with fuel made from plants instead of oil. Its easy to be critical, without an answer or solution. Airlines and Engine manufacturers are spending billions on trying to go greener and still keep air fares within reach. All these advancements takes years or even decades, not weeks. Think of the emerging markets where there are no green requirements (China) Worry about their non green signature, its the largest!!!
@elbuggo
2 ай бұрын
@@johnchristmas7522 RE: many new aircraft will be flying with fuel made from plants That is a delusional pipe dream, and totally pointless. Without cheap fuel, there will be no mass flying. Again, if a new plane use less fuel, there will be more tickets sold due to lower costs, and they will need more planes. Total consumption will then increase, and more polar bears on the North Pole will drown. Isn't that so?.
@Twin_tower_destroyer
2 ай бұрын
Absolutely stupid, A360 will come first not A390. Just because Airbus went straight to A380 and skipped out 3 aircraft doesn't mean they may as well go to A390
@FeRnAnDo1538
2 ай бұрын
I don’t know. It is too soon since the A350 started their service. I will go with the A350Neo name and reserve the A360 for a groundbreaking technology BUT that is not totally convincing people. So, when people have totally confident in this new technology, you can use the A370, A390, and (prepare yourself) the A395.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback
@ZacPlowman
2 ай бұрын
I wonder if the 777X will eventually surpass the A350 in any area.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment ✈️✈️✈️
@membershipofbus
10 күн бұрын
Show me the proof
@alexanderbelov6892
2 ай бұрын
6:33 It is named MS-21. МС-21 is written in Cyrillic alphabet. Acronym means 'Магистральные Самолёты 21 века' or 'Long-haul aircrafts of 21 century'.
@herceg6772
2 ай бұрын
A381 like A321 maybe
@user-fw2dt3er7c
2 ай бұрын
Why don't they just skip A390 and go straight to A400. It sounds better.
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
yeah thanks for your comment
@sorgfaeltig
Ай бұрын
The Airbus A400 is already out. It's a four engine turboprop military transport plane.
@Recoverlerbotines
2 ай бұрын
Bro just ran out of video ideas😂
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
Not really, do you have any recommendations? 🤣🤣🤣
@Recoverlerbotines
2 ай бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA can u make a video about the rise and fall of Douglas airplanes
@earlradius9511
2 ай бұрын
bogus news.. MAKES ME SICK.....
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️
@markpstapley
2 ай бұрын
Bullshit click bait
@FLIGAVIA
2 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️
@TheChiefEng
2 ай бұрын
While ultra long flights may be a goal in itself, these ultra long haul flights are rarely economical unless the airplane is configured with premium cabins only. Flying an airplane on an ultra long flight lasting 19-20 hours cannot be made economical, at least not today, if the airplane cabin layout is standard with 40-60 premium seats and the rest normal economy seats. The reason the ultra long haul flights can only be made economical with a fully premium seat cabin is fuel. For an ultra long haul flight, the airplane must be able to load much more fuel for the flight and that means a heavier airplane which again means a poor overall economy unless you can get the money in and earn a profit and that is only possible at the moment if the entire airplane cabin is configured with premium seats only.
Пікірлер: 67