I have a few of these in one penny, and half penny, but they are in such a state I'm afraid they're not worth much. They range in date from 1805 -1809.
@grahamturner5963
Ай бұрын
A lovely coin and certainly more pocket friendly than the Cartwheel issue. Probably my least favourite George III portrait, though
@BitsAndBobsCoins
Ай бұрын
Yes A strange portrait for sure
@donwoodard2204
Ай бұрын
I like these penny's have seen several over the years at shows , they are usually in a bad state , now knowing they are 100% copper i understand 👍 😊
@BitsAndBobsCoins
Ай бұрын
Yes Sadly usually worn
@david_porthouse
Ай бұрын
The 1797 penny is supposedly made of copper worth one twelfth of a silver shilling like the 1787 shilling (the gold standard was not adopted until 1816). This coin is a bit less bulky than the 1797 penny. Is this a real change in metal ratios, or just an outbreak of common sense?
@BitsAndBobsCoins
Ай бұрын
I think it was smaller due to complaints about the cartwheel
@charlesadkins7067
Ай бұрын
great coin
@BitsAndBobsCoins
Ай бұрын
Thank you 👍
@andykerr3165
Ай бұрын
I have a worn George 3rd penny. I think they were smaller than the previous cartwheel penny as the cost of the napoleonic wars had necessitated cost cutting. An early example of currency depreciation??
@BitsAndBobsCoins
Ай бұрын
Very true
@davewhite7182
Ай бұрын
The copper proof version is hard to find.
@BitsAndBobsCoins
Ай бұрын
Very true
@rascaltheferret
Ай бұрын
Do you have a link for the 1806 half penny
@BitsAndBobsCoins
Ай бұрын
kzitem.infoL0Yiq9TW4KI?feature=share It's a short but hopefully useful
@user-tb1pw1qp5k
Ай бұрын
I have a 1806 penny worth the same as your 1807coin,?
Пікірлер: 17