DLSS 3: only 4000 series FSR 3: RTX 4000, RTX 3000, RTX 2000, GTX 1000, RX 7000 RX 6000, Intel Arc, basically many GPUs
@Дмитрий-и3ц1э
14 күн бұрын
Yeah that's why we buy 4000 series
@get-in-2-get-out774
13 күн бұрын
@@Дмитрий-и3ц1э 'Cause the more you buy, the more you save'
@hitts8928
13 күн бұрын
But its ugly 😂😂
@Bilal.Hussain.Shaikh
13 күн бұрын
@@Дмитрий-и3ц1э well I'm getting an AMD RX 6800 16GB non XT, in my local market it cost 320$~350$
@Bilal.Hussain.Shaikh
13 күн бұрын
@@hitts8928 👍🏿😅👍🏻
@iplayfpsgames9377
14 күн бұрын
imo fsr isnt really miles better but the fact that its available on any gpu makes it way better
@kazuviking
14 күн бұрын
For years FSR3 was available as mods.
@Bilal.Hussain.Shaikh
14 күн бұрын
Agreed
@tryharder1053
13 күн бұрын
Having used both FSR is horrible
@lupidor1465
13 күн бұрын
@@tryharder1053 what are you supposed to do with no possibility to upgrade your pc and are forced to play on a toaster?
@tryharder1053
13 күн бұрын
@@lupidor1465open a bakery sell toasted bread reinvest for a bigger toaster repeat till toaster buys you a 4090
@TestingGames
14 күн бұрын
I want to note that dlss 3 loads less CPU than fsr 3 and native resolution
@lyteness859
14 күн бұрын
it's reducing the real frames per second, the ratio is always 1:2
@nocopyrightgameplaystockvi231
14 күн бұрын
@@lyteness859 DLSS uses hardware CNN for inserting 99% exact same images between the real frames.
@nocopyrightgameplaystockvi231
14 күн бұрын
Yes because DLSS is done 100% on Turing Hardware on the GPU (no CPU) while FSR uses CPU instead of GPU.
@reviewforthetube6485
14 күн бұрын
The cpu usage should actually go up
@aboriginalmang
14 күн бұрын
@@reviewforthetube6485when the frame generation is handled by a specialized hardware in the gpu, the cpu wont be burdened
@furieux6742
14 күн бұрын
2:40 Over 17Gb memory of vram.. Jesus... Enought internet today..😮
@sapphyrus
13 күн бұрын
FG also increases VRAM usage.
@furieux6742
13 күн бұрын
@@sapphyrus its like. Henry "mm im hungry" 🤣🤣😅
@FireCestina1200
13 күн бұрын
@@furieux6742it's GB
@parcosmaulo1
14 күн бұрын
i'd just like to point out that FSR 3.1 would have put RTX 2000/3000 in feature parity with 4000, by allowing them to use frame generation with DLSS. so cdpr not adding the latest version is bad for most nvidia users too
@DerBaerserker
14 күн бұрын
at this point you can ask yourself again why there are mods out there that can implement FSR much better and even use the latest version FSR 3.1.
@Javier64691
14 күн бұрын
This is FSR 3, which only have FSR 2.2 and Frame Generation and its badly implemented
@shadowlemon69
14 күн бұрын
FSR 3.1 is what we need though
@vanm8523
14 күн бұрын
does the game not work stably with FSR 3?
@TheAtomoh
14 күн бұрын
@@vanm8523It looks awful, thats the issue
@JaxonFlaxon-b8o
14 күн бұрын
@@vanm8523 3.1 lets people use other upscalers with AMD/FSR's Frame generation.
@Definedd
13 күн бұрын
@@vanm8523 it works but they still use fsr 2.1 as the upscaler and it looks horrible, its so easy to do idk why theyd do this and not fsr 3.1. then youd be able to use dlss with it too
@grzybex6727
12 күн бұрын
Check my mod and see @@vanm8523
@fhiscXboxAjshach-x6v
14 күн бұрын
FSR is Not Good As DLSS But FSR 3 Is Available For All Old Gen GPUs Which Makes It Good!
@Perfect_person_who_has_4_lags
13 күн бұрын
From what I'm looking at it performs slightly better and it doesn't look that much different
@themonsternb
13 күн бұрын
The performance is literally the same, in what dlss is better? 😂
@Perfect_person_who_has_4_lags
13 күн бұрын
@@themonsternb ?
@ManojKahar__3515
5 күн бұрын
Even 4090 cant give 60 fps in cyberpunk without upscaling 😂
@zxcv404
14 күн бұрын
Tensor core + Hardware optical flow accelerator (DLSS3) VS Shader core + CPU (FSR3)
@P0werINC.
13 күн бұрын
Is it just me or do others see it too? DLSS+FG - the flow is always smooth FSR+FG - the stream seems to be jerky in places, as if the fps drops in places, but the fps counter does not change
@isomit
14 күн бұрын
Finaly FSR was come to cyberpunk 2077. The 30 series users very happy.
@Madinay
12 күн бұрын
They implemented the old FSE 3.0 not 3.1 and it looks worse then FSR 2,
@irsshill4502
6 күн бұрын
Not really, fg still trash
@reviewforthetube6485
14 күн бұрын
Its so so nice to see these upscalers finally beating native resolutions times. People cant go oh look at the frametime anymore.
@Scooppi
14 күн бұрын
It's not about frametime, it's about input lag, which is not shown here.
@reviewforthetube6485
14 күн бұрын
@Scooppi I'm just saying frametime. On earlier models you would need way more fps to reach the same frametime. It's better now then it used to be. Also on the lag/latency .
@igm1571
14 күн бұрын
@@Scooppi the latency is not a big deal when you play AAA games, like literally cant see a different
@kazuviking
14 күн бұрын
@@igm1571 But on lower end hardware you can feel it.
@igm1571
14 күн бұрын
@@kazuviking the dev recommended about you should get the game atleast 60fps to make sure that it wont ruin your experience, use FG when you are lower than 60fps only make the game run worst while still doesnt look smooth.
@Scooppi
14 күн бұрын
FSR reports the same fps as DLSS but DLSS looks much smoother.
@supakorn5432
13 күн бұрын
It looks fake fps because there is a lot of fps but it doesn't feel smooth.
@patrikmiskovic791
13 күн бұрын
Because they use fsr 3 not 3.1
@TalonsTech
14 күн бұрын
FSR looks pretty bad in quality, too much ghosting and fizzling. Also why is it almost same FPS or higher than DLSS FG but has weird pacing and image judder, it does not look real or smooth at all.
@Deathscythe91
14 күн бұрын
1:41 the frame time graph for fsr is going all over the place 🤣
@flamingophone
14 күн бұрын
FSRollerCoaster
@MadridistaFrieren
14 күн бұрын
That's what you get for having free stuff fr. AMD fanboy can't comprehend how badly AMD is LACKING to Nvidia in terms of technology. Even tim from hardware unboxed said that xess is better which is 😂
@SkribuAlex
14 күн бұрын
atleast the framerate is higher and constant, no big deal
@ikram2512
14 күн бұрын
@@MadridistaFrieren free?
@davidv-a1226
14 күн бұрын
@@MadridistaFrieren nga its a shitty implementation in a nvidia game,they didn't even added fsr 3.1 wich is already 4 months old,look the frametime in other games like Frontiers of Pandora or TLOU
@mikegaming4924
13 күн бұрын
That official FSR FG implementation is very bad... It is basically generating only 20% of the frame, in the exact middle , small square there. This is because FSR FG is causing ghosting in around static elements or vehicles so they used this kind of solution, of only frame generating a small area in the middle.
@SandTiger42
13 күн бұрын
How is this a thing? DLSS looks amazing. FSR 3 looks like it slows it down to 30fps. I don't know how it works, but DLSS looks smooth like it's inserting new images between the frames that blend it smoothly. FSR just looks like it's duplicating a current frame and thus it's causing more stuttering.
@KianFloppa
13 күн бұрын
THEY IMPLEMENTED THE OLD VERSION 3.0 NOT 3.1
@charleyweinhardt
13 күн бұрын
FSR upscaling and apparently framegen, gives you sharper image more details better colors. I actually want DLSS to be better in both of these cases, but i often end up settling for FSR because DLSS looks like there's a film on the screen, forcing me to bring sharpness down to 0 and then use NIS at a high setting, but then with that NIS setting I then check FSR turn the sharpness up a little bit and WAY more detail. The only place I see DLSS winning with me is less ghosting, FSR is a true image scaler of native, whereas DLSS is a processed AI upscaler, it tends to distract me ,takes me out of the game. If you ever get too much shimmering or glitchiness or distortions with FSR, just run it with DLDSR 1.75 if you're on NVIDIA, if you're on AMD try RSR in combination but it can be a little more laggy I think
@jeanytpremium
14 күн бұрын
Input lag would have been great as metric aswell
@ufoslattt9582
13 күн бұрын
the lowest graph is frametiming in milseconds i mean that is a bit like input lag no?
@FrostyBud777
12 күн бұрын
I did lots of testing on my channel, FSR three has much less jagged edges and artifacts than FSR 2.1. I’m running retracing lighting and Reflections with performance FSR three and frame Jen and I get about 100 FPS throughout most of the game. It looks 10 billion times better than the tones of jagged edged artifact all over the screen with FSR 2.1.
@qarim350xd
13 күн бұрын
Shame on CDPR that they implemented FSR 3.0 instead of 3.1. It basically uses the upscaler of FSR 2.2 + FG.
@nesseihtgnay9419
13 күн бұрын
DLSS is better, as it's quality is better and it's AI, FSR is not
@justinjenkins2946
10 күн бұрын
Didn’t realize cyberpunk made the 4090 work so hard.
@TaQuetoCamolas
14 күн бұрын
They have managed to get fsr 3 look worse than fsr 2.1 or 2.2 whichever was already implemented, not even 3.1 version so people with 3000 series can use it with dlss. I feel like they are doing it on purpose, even modders do a much better job than them
@25MHzisbest
14 күн бұрын
It isn't FSR 3
@GolderiQ
13 күн бұрын
Nice there’s RT FG, RT FG + DLSS/FSR Quality, but why there’s no DLSS/FSR Quality for Path Tracing part?
@ohmkhai8989
14 күн бұрын
Well DLSS save the place for more CPU usage
@selohcin
13 күн бұрын
2:15 It might be just me, but that does not look like 36 FPS on the FSR side.
@otaviotisikawa2594
14 күн бұрын
Lossless scaling for the smooth W
@legit5761
13 күн бұрын
This Cyberpunk FSR FG new update doesn't smooth the frametime for my experience. Something went wrong amd FG.
@cmoneytheman
11 күн бұрын
How much fps does 4090 get with everything on high instead
@muhammedshahil
3 күн бұрын
please someone tell me why i should choose nvidia and not amd for game development and mid gaming
@INSIGHT16
13 күн бұрын
Fanboys of all types are fun to look at, guys why do you care which is better? Start paying attention to things that benefit you as a person, AMD and Nvidia doesn't give a dan about you both. Only Money! All though FSR 3 supports all GPUs, its a very decent piece of technology, its not easy to support all GPUs and run well.
@RivalPredator
13 күн бұрын
The fact a 14600k doesn’t bottle neck a 4090 shows a lot lol
@Kakashi-yw4li
13 күн бұрын
I’d still use DLSS
@indrahaseo
13 күн бұрын
why not try using FSR 3.1 and compare it then
@シャオシェン
13 күн бұрын
cyberpunk does not have fsr 3.1
@jforce321
12 күн бұрын
fsr frame gen seems to have the same issue it has in alot of cases which is poor frame pacing.
@orhooorvfuc96484
12 күн бұрын
Bro i7 870+4090 i9 14ks 210?
@brasiliafc2138
14 күн бұрын
You are testing fsr 3 on cyberpunk with nvidia's card ?
@mekhildav8d710
14 күн бұрын
How to run Dlss on Amd Card? 😂😂😂
@brasiliafc2138
14 күн бұрын
@@mekhildav8d710 obviously, not logical to test the fsr on an nvidia card. I just wanted to say that.
@okami9039
14 күн бұрын
@@brasiliafc2138why's it not logical? Fsr runs the same way for every gpu whether its amd or Nvidia or Intel it doesn't matter
@Esmeranus1315
13 күн бұрын
@@okami9039 maybe he hopes that if FSR used in AMD card will be much better than NVIDIA
@Misz1986
6 күн бұрын
2:30 With low FPS I can see that AMD FG is much more fake than Nvidia. I think human eye needs 60-90fps, rest of details u could improve in old games with some RTX Remix solutions which enables Raytracing which needs RR - or other "denoising" methods, which AMD still doesnt have. I means u see much more raytraced lightning with Nvidia, much further from light emitters. I could only tell from video RR is disabled for Nvidia or its hard to tell without full screen comparision. On my RTX it does great job.
@aayankhan942
5 күн бұрын
Fsr on 4090?
@naithanwa6866
12 күн бұрын
FSR3 not smooth?
@kimwnlogdan9452
13 күн бұрын
test fsr with amd gpu plz
@OmnianMIU
13 күн бұрын
It's definitely the same 😑
@ajxx9987
14 күн бұрын
Is frame generation worth it?
@Kaneki_Live
7 күн бұрын
DLSS gives me headache and I actually feel sick just watching. Hell no from me.
@patrikmiskovic791
13 күн бұрын
Why not fsr 3.1 ? Still old nothing new 😞
@iikon01
14 күн бұрын
Native much better than both Fg is a big mess The 60 fps feels like 40 Because if a fake fps of course And there is drop in graphics it look like ghosting in details I mean the overall graphics much worse than native or dlss , fsr without fg Better to compare dlss and fsr and Native without fg
@heitorferreira2210
14 күн бұрын
I managed to make it visibly more comfortable just by putting it on the fsr scale 1. But I'm sad that my mods went from F
@zyzU400Kg
13 күн бұрын
if nothing changes in 5 years with this performances i think FSR will have the same image quality as DLSS have but until there... feels like FSR are like 3 resolutions below DLSS
@testdirver
13 күн бұрын
pointles if you own a rtx 4090
@Dr.D00p
14 күн бұрын
The real question is, will the 5090 be fast enough to run CP 2077 at 60fps+, 4K native with no DLSS FG.
@Sega-q6p
14 күн бұрын
And why run at 60 frames if you can run at 100 with DLSS FG
@Dr.D00p
14 күн бұрын
@Sega-q6p it would just be kind of like a milestone moment, people were asking what would it take to run it at 4K 60fps native back when the game first released, nearly 5yrs later it still hasn't happened...
@Sims64340
13 күн бұрын
Without ray tracing, a 4070Ti can run at 4K 60 fps
2080S equal to 3060ti - so prob not worth comparing.
@ManojKahar__3515
5 күн бұрын
4060 is better because Of DLSS 3 and Latest Encoders and Features
@bseleon2946
5 күн бұрын
The hell point of having software features that can't be used? TG commenters are getting rattard these days.
@ForMyself-d4n
13 күн бұрын
I7-3770 vs i7-3770k
@CarFlightGamesCFG
11 күн бұрын
rtx4090 - 400w consumo
@BronteEd
9 күн бұрын
694 Block Keys
@JuegaPepeyito
13 күн бұрын
METELE EL 7800x3d
@eriksera2901
13 күн бұрын
I hate DLSS or FSR because looks like blurry sh*t compared to native.
@kiwivda
14 күн бұрын
Ennesimo cassonetto con le ruote, ottimo. Veramente bella.
@anthonyc2159
14 күн бұрын
CD PROJEKT RED is by far the worst company at implementing AMD software in their games. FSR 3.1 released months ago and these guys used 3.0 which is basically FSR 2.2 (much worse) with FG. 🤡🤡🤡
@JustGamingTV1
14 күн бұрын
well boo hoo hoo gayAMD fanboi crying as usual
@RaulMazuchelli
14 күн бұрын
I was seriously dissapointed too...
@akileshq
14 күн бұрын
But if you have an RTX 30 use DLSS + Nukem's FG mod, that way you get double the fps quality and it's noticeable... unless you have an AMD GPU, in that case just cry like you're doing.
@anthonyc2159
14 күн бұрын
@@JustGamingTV1 You m@ron, I have a 3070 for my work rig. 🤣
@xovgamer
14 күн бұрын
@@JustGamingTV1lol bro I'm having a rtx 4080, but kinda feel sad for amd, cuz cdpr is Nvidia's playground 😂
@DrhassanNasib
9 күн бұрын
VRAM usage 🥸
@eikbolha5883
14 күн бұрын
Game is for me broken for some reason game lloks like 640p when extrmly close and big canr even find settings cuz its thats fucked and this all after i activete frame gen and trestrt gama man fuc this shit.
@augustomartins9516
14 күн бұрын
FSR sucks !
@zen9793
14 күн бұрын
Dlss FG sucks too, dont be a fanboy
@Lativik
13 күн бұрын
@@zen9793 DLSS better, more better!!!!
@augustomartins9516
13 күн бұрын
@@zen9793 dlss fg is great, you don't like it because you don't have it
@augustomartins9516
13 күн бұрын
@@zen9793 you are the fanboy, Just look at the pictures and you can immediately see that they are sh1t
@zen9793
13 күн бұрын
@@augustomartins9516 no, the reason is that it increases input lag and makes artifacts
@EugeneA89
12 күн бұрын
Native vs FAP vs FAPFAPFAP
@ClipperFanW
14 күн бұрын
Native gaming is dead. Thank god Nvidia changed it to upscaling which helps in performance. Thank god Nvidia exists.
@kazuviking
14 күн бұрын
Thank god to them game devs now using cheap hacks like DLSS and FSR so they can leave optimization and pump out garbage.
@arosh2241
13 күн бұрын
@@kazuviking lol how is that their fault, its developer faults if they do shit like that.
@kazuviking
13 күн бұрын
@@arosh2241 Looks like people cannot detect sarcasm.
@Embreh89
13 күн бұрын
lol they intentionally used an older version to make dlss look better :D cyberpunk is set up to make nvidia gpus look better... btw this video is fake.
@OmnianMIU
13 күн бұрын
Your life is fake
@w_Gamez_q8
11 күн бұрын
both bad no one should use these console upscaling garbage ,native 4k is better
@maythetech
14 күн бұрын
Не . АМD красавчики
@floydefisher
14 күн бұрын
So, what can we learn from the fact that GPU"S have enough horsepower to create and display 'fake frames'. Are games themselves a bottleneck in performance?
@stonehouseguitars3869
13 күн бұрын
Fake video
@miladh1859
12 күн бұрын
Another Fakr Fsr...🫡
@mirkosalvigni964
14 күн бұрын
Fsr? Ahahahha
@Ladioz
14 күн бұрын
Just play at native medium settings. problem solved
@Sims64340
13 күн бұрын
Just play the PS5 version then
@Ladioz
13 күн бұрын
@@Sims64340 Cyberpunk at native looks good in almost every setting at native. I never liked FSR, it is too blurry. Plus... if im getting 70 to 80 fps im more than happy because it feels good in a game like Cyberpunk. So basically im more into native 70fps rather than FSR3 90-100fps. The only reason I would turn on these features are if i had a 4k monitor... as the video here demonstrates
@shredd5845
13 күн бұрын
Я лучше на минималки всё скину, чем играть со всякими фсарами и дллссами
@yunusselmanyilmaz6383
14 күн бұрын
add test afmf 1.0 and 2.0
@メタラーT
14 күн бұрын
2:13 frame pacing🤔
@chaneljr508
12 күн бұрын
Thanks
@fernandopimentel662
13 күн бұрын
A perda de qualidade gráfica e de resolução no FSR3 é muito notória
@AnthonyJones-i1f
8 күн бұрын
Allen Charles Clark Barbara Robinson Helen
@mohamedsaad1147
13 күн бұрын
sorry for the noob question. when using fsr should I put my resulotion to 4k (my normal resulotion )or lower it?
@OmnianMIU
13 күн бұрын
No, throw away crApMD trashdeon and get an RTX to have DLSS
@slothonastick32
13 күн бұрын
Pointless video. KZitem is incapable of demonstrating the difference.
Пікірлер: 200