Amazing debate! It really highlights the problems of judicial activism in light of the recent decision on Roe. However, while I completely understand Justice Thomas's Roe concurrence regarding substantive due process I find it hard to swallow that without it the state could use any process to deprive one of their rights. The way I understand it Substantive Due Process is more of a redundancy than an oxymoron.
@fishermanfinder7198
6 жыл бұрын
The first law the people's are free from invasion of government has no authority but commercial Any law that enter interest of people's life your way of belief That why the court having problems
@michah321
2 жыл бұрын
I think it's fundamentally un American to believe out of hand that ANYONE, and the legislators as an extension, has the right to tell a human being what they can do with their own body. The court made a good call that viability is sensible because now a separate, autonomous person exists. But it's way too cumbersome to be use abortion as the benchmark. It's absolutely NO ONE's business what people do in their sexual relationships, if they practice contraception, or who they marry. Anyone who argues that it's their business what someone else chooses in this regard should listen to how absurd they sound and ask themselves, is that REALLY the world you want to live in or what embodies the freedom we identify with as Americans.
Пікірлер: 3