" you shall not covet your neighbor wife " " an impur love is not love ". Facts !
@pjosepha
3 жыл бұрын
Come on preach it😡😡😡😡😡😡👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
@Bea-hp3se
2 жыл бұрын
That's what you got from the movie??
@tissifly
2 жыл бұрын
Love is love. If not for the power imbalance Anna would have never married Karenin, and Dolly would have left Stiva instead of being disrespected through his continuous affairs.
@marshall886
3 ай бұрын
Not a fact a value. It is a statement of fact to say that it is written as a commandment in scripture.
@emilycurtis4398
4 жыл бұрын
I love Stiva stammering in the beginning. His affairs are known and he's trying to save Anna by ensuring she stays married to Karenin.
@TheDisKit
5 жыл бұрын
Love how Kitty and Levin seem to be the only ones to see through all.
@tissifly
2 жыл бұрын
Wasn't Levin supposed to be a stand in for Lev Tolstoy own ideals and way of life. It's a pity he didn't uphold his values in his own life. He was a bad husband to his wife, Sophia, after the rosy honeymoon period has ended.
@TheDisKit
2 жыл бұрын
@@tissifly Yeah, I always knew in a way that it was Tolstoy speaking through the character Levin all along because the origins of his ideals seemed so genuine, but didn't know about the author's real life until only recently. I wonder how someone can hold these ideals yet live a life style that goes against the very thing.
@zitronentee
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheDisKit I feel that all of Anna Karenina characters are Tolstoy. They represent every part of Tolstoy, not just Levin. Levin-Kitty is what Tolstoy think should be like. Anna-Vronsky is the impulsive, escapist side of Tolstoy.
@dreamsteddybearsmaster
4 жыл бұрын
0:34 Haha that awkward laughter at 0:33-0:35 is very telling. On the other hand, I love Kitty's little smile. As Tess said, she sees through it all. How to subtly roast people a la Konstantin Levin during late Imperial Russia
@jonnyqwst
6 жыл бұрын
So much of this movie is genius
@theQuestion626
5 жыл бұрын
Levin makes a good point.
@Bea-hp3se
2 жыл бұрын
No he doesn't. The whole story is about how people are too quick to judge. Levin himself in the end of the book after Anna's death finally realizes that he was wrong and understands that even though he had the fortune to fall in love in a way that is acceptable in society, others, like Anna and Vronsky, didn't. So yeah you better read the book again or watch the movie or whatever
@dreamsteddybearsmaster
4 жыл бұрын
Levin is definitely the dream man... he just gets it. Too bad men like this never exist anymore... and like everyone at the table was guilty of his words. It seems like adultery runs in the family. The fragility of choice, especially a bad choice, may be the end of you. Your ruin. People are too rash these days
@troublemaker833
3 жыл бұрын
Levin is probably the easiest to emphasize with, he does have his mistakes though. Especially in the book he feels morally superior a lot of the time and feels like that gives him the right to judge others. He is very absolute in his opinions of people and doesn’t consider personal circumstances. For him there’s only black and white people and a woman so much as not being bound to a men sitting in a club in the afternoon is enough to put her on the black side of the spectrum. I‘m not saying I don’t like him. Just that his idealism often times seems harsh and judgmental.
@TheMsLollidella
2 жыл бұрын
@@troublemaker833 definitely gotta check out the book but from the movie itself it just seems he’s got his head right considering how everyone else was acting. So may seem judgmental but he’s not wrong about his idea of right and wrong. Almost everyone at the table probably guilty of adultery, least he was being real about his intentions
@Tadashi2
4 ай бұрын
"Divorce is one thing. Dinner is something else." LMAO that while Oblonsky is willing to be reasonable on the first part, he's not going to budge on inviting Karenin to dinner. Even funnier, Karenin decides to concede that point as a lost cause.
Пікірлер: 20