sPhil is a collaborative platform for developing philosophy through open-source principles, emphasizing the collective nature of thinking. 🌐 sphil.xyz 📘 www.facebook.c... 🐦 @sphildotxyz 💾 github.com/sys...
Open Source philosophy sounds amazing! I'll definitely be paying attention to this project
@barisari1
4 күн бұрын
Gentlemen, this is great news. This is Geist calling! I am looking to participate in the project as much as I can!
@sphildotxyz
3 күн бұрын
Thank you so much 🙏 looking forward to your contributions, Baris! ⚡~Filip
@MrBigbanan
3 күн бұрын
I am here, ask ?
@reijin999
Күн бұрын
i can tell which one is the developer 🤣
@MrBigbanan
3 күн бұрын
I need a training platform that will help me think abstractly every time it matters, such as raise my IQ and the other intelligences to the max in the optimal path possible. So visualize the philosophy ?
@sphildotxyz
3 күн бұрын
We'll be adding some basic graphs where relevant to help visualize the idea, but hopefully working slowly through the material can get you there in the meanwhile. This stuff ain't easy! ~Filip
@yoavco99
Күн бұрын
It has been shown in much research that it is basically impossible to raise your IQ by much at all. Edit: to make my comment clearer, you could probably raise your IQ if you grind hard enough, but it won't be by much, maybe a couple of points like 0-3~ or something
@zeusolympus1664
3 күн бұрын
Mate I dont know that this is about, but come on you could have done better in the name. I saw your video on my feed and mistakenly read it as syphilis.
@sphildotxyz
3 күн бұрын
Phew, we were about to call it sysPhilosophilis. Dodged a bullet there!
@zeusolympus1664
2 күн бұрын
@@sphildotxyz yea m8 you dodged a elephant there. 😂 Keep up the good work. Anything open source is God's work.
@sphildotxyz
Күн бұрын
@@zeusolympus1664 Praise be OSS 🙏
@juliocesarfs15
3 күн бұрын
Hi guys, I started self-learning philosophy this year and I'm really excited about this project. I don't have much experience in the field yet, but I would like to contribute (if possible) with my area of expertise, which is Product Design and Web Development. So, If you are looking for help in this area, I would really like to get involved.
@sphildotxyz
3 күн бұрын
Hi @juliocesarfs15 Awesome to hear you're excited! Yes! There's lots to do on the web and product front. We already have some responsiveness bugs to squash! Let's discuss this further over email contact@systemphil.com ~Filip
@yoavco99
Күн бұрын
I dislike the Idea that this is separated only into philosophers. Perhaps adding a section for topics which are not philosopher-specific.
@shepherd_of_art
21 сағат бұрын
I love the concept! However, may I ask why you are going by a per-philosopher categorization strategy to boot and not by a per-idea categorization? It's much easier for people to contribute their ideas on philosophical topics rather than knowing the work of specific philosophers necessarily.
@sphildotxyz
Сағат бұрын
Hey, thanks for the positive feedback. That's an interesting suggestion, and it's definitely something that we could look into incorporating further down the line. But the impetus behind our approach is the desire to elucidate the thought of systematic philosophers. As fans of Hegel, we think systematic philosophy is the way to go, and the most important thing in any system of philosophy is internal coherence. But in such big systems, like Hegel's (though, of course Hegel is not the only one), getting agreement on the internal coherence of the whole system requires a lot of work on the minutiae of the system - and that's what we hope SPhil accomplishes.
@luszczi
2 күн бұрын
Ok, perhaps I haven't exactly thought this through, but isn't this just a wiki with extra steps?
@sphildotxyz
Күн бұрын
We aim not only to gather existing knowledge but to create new knowledge as well. In that respect we're closer to nLab. ~Filip
@IUT-e8x
16 сағат бұрын
Sounds really promising and exciting good luck.
@etterathe
Күн бұрын
Great initiative guys
@caiodavi9829
Күн бұрын
nice
@trshdev
2 күн бұрын
This is a fun idea. I could imagine it working best with Analytic philosophy though, given how an analytic approach to philosophy tends to start from a first principles and work up, and thus doesn't require as much literary context. I'm imaging an open source version of the Tractatus Logico Philosophicus (Wittgenstein) or Reasons and Persons (Parfit) could be really cool. Starred ⭐ :)
@sphildotxyz
2 күн бұрын
Sounds like a great idea, we would love to have a Wittgenstein and/or Parfit section in the encyclopaedia. Get in touch with us via email if you want to start to setup that page.
Пікірлер: 28