0:49 Eey, Critical Drinker is one of my favorite movie critics, nice to see you acknowledge him :) It is interesting that video game adaptations are becoming more prevalent, with Detective Pikachu and Sonic being the first ones to break the curse while Mario is the first to make over a billion dollars, the movie industry recognizes the gold mine. I'd say we're in the video game movie Golden Age :3
@syrenamichele
7 ай бұрын
Gold mine haha that sounds about right
@TheBroGamer14082
7 ай бұрын
here's to hoping.
@dar-nakkallig
7 ай бұрын
Knowing the trend with FNAF’s first film, Bendy will probably have an 8+ year development… (PS, this be joke poking playful fun at FNAF)
@syrenamichele
7 ай бұрын
Hahaha seriously 🤣
@alexb859
7 ай бұрын
Awesome video!!! To be fair Angry Birds got a movie back in 2016 :)
@syrenamichele
7 ай бұрын
True!
@sihly_me9386
6 ай бұрын
The one question I have is, how do you make a mascot horror scary? Mascot horror games are directed towards children, with marketable characters that can be turned into merchandise. You wouldn't want a horrifying character, a villain, you find horrible, to be on a shirt or turned into a toy figure. As you said with the FNaF movie, it wasn't very scary... not only are they soft, cute and friendly-looking animatronics, which aren't at all broken or withered to look scarier, but we don't even see them as a threat. All of the kills are off-camera - the only times we see the animatronics, they're super slow. I don't know how we're supposed to believe that they're capable of killing people in closets and making them bleed when they have such soft hands. And not to forget, the movie tries to change your opinion by showing that the animatronics are actually very goofy and friendly... not very clear on what the movie wants us to think about the characters. But back to Bendy, certain things are gonna have to be changed to make it more scarier. For example, the movie can't take place in a charming studio which has a black and yellow, simple, classic cartoon style, because: 1 - that doesn't even look real, and 2 - it's not scary, it looks cartoony. Also, the idea of a Mickey Mouse rip-off turning into a monster made out of actual ink, is a funny premise for a film that's genuinely going to try to be scary. That is if this Bendy film is even aimed to be a horror movie. If not, then they can do whatever they want with the film and make it something unique, instead of just a "horror" movie, which also has a cute Goofy-looking wolf side-character. At best, all of the more cartoony aspects should be thrown out of the movie adaptation, and just focus on a very twisted and horrifying cartoon character-turned-real-life-creature. One of the most effective parts of monster horror movies is when you don't get to see what the monster looks like for the entire film, which makes your brain race through different terrifying thoughts as to what it looks like - the fear of the unknown. So, in a movie where the monster (the *Mascot*) is the highlight of the film, there's no mystery to be scared of (let's just ignore the fact that there's also gonna be a Poppy Playtime movie, how on Earth are they gonna make that scary?? smh). People watching the FNaF film probably would've been a little bit scared while watching the beginning scene, because we don't know why the security guard is scared out of his wits, and why he's trying to escape the building. All we know is that he's running away from something to be *terrified* of. So, I don't really have any tips as to how they can make this Bendy movie an actual horror movie, if it's going to be based on the first game. But I wonder how it'll turn out. Btw this entire comment is based on the assumpton that the movie will be a live-action adaptation, which it might not be, so who knows what this movie will be like
@syrenamichele
6 ай бұрын
You bring up good points. I'm interested to see how they navigate these issues.
Пікірлер: 12