Funny thing is that, if you generalize this a bit, you can likely apply such analysis to other nations - I can definitely tell it can happen to Canada (I mean the Freedom Convoy start here...) As for your end of video question, for Canadians, I will pick B - because option A doesn't really affect any change in practice; instead of exposing any issues and derive any solutions, you just ended up trying to justify it, and thus become a mere theatric. You are never going to change someone's opinion in an argument. But I will concede it may not work for somewhere else (My apologies to Taiwanese, but I do feel our mindset are different enough)
B 有對話是民主能持續進步的關鍵,但老百姓平日忙於生存,鮮少有人能深入了解各項重大政策的利弊得失,大多數政客又喜歡用愚民方式洗腦民眾,操作意識形態,喊喊口號就好,(例如:九二共識、用愛發電、發大財、反萊豬、反核食,四個不(都)同意等等......) ,叫民眾看顏色投票就好,這時就很感謝有志琪七七這樣的優質頻道,把每個值得討論關注的議題一一抽絲剝繭,化繁為簡讓一般人可以快速了解,說明過程中盡量保持中立態度而不是訴諸情緒,恭喜頻道即將邁入百萬訂閱~~~
Пікірлер: 871