"How To Give Dawah To Atheist & Agnostic" . Ustad Hamza Tzortzis Did A Seminar On this. One Of The Best Series, On How To Give Dawah To Atheist. I Highly Recommend It. This Series will give you correct Framework , The Right stepping stones in order for you to walk on, In order to reach a certain Destination, It will give you right Foundations and the conceptual tools in order for you to understand how to articulate a compassionate and Intelligent case for Islam to our brothers and sisters in Humanity. Link Of The Playlist: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg2TvzrH5vEdqgboebkksKLq Do Check Out These Playlist..I Highly Recommend Arguments For The Existence Of God: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg3taF93a9ThvdYOSvqSGzvp How To Convey Islam To Atheist: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg2ZQgm5DDn1qLAbbEw43Z88 Islam And Liberalism: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg0aguMql_QAe-BZ6RnNJu52 Islam And Feminism: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg1Vv22K2hmwOCAWGUYGvmvb Islam And Science: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg2cs-pBAnRA_wrTF7fgzSN6 Islam And Evolution: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg1n9XpyooRdOiTR2z8iLG9j Dealing With Doubts: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg19DfEtNiWOyzfhvnzgvw7c Proof Of Prophethood Of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg3ivUwlkALW7ay0wUCU1CLJ Why Does Merciful God Allow Evil & Suffering?: kzitem.info/door/PLgrhw8sbiJg0NDVy0C2I50jSuWh9bu6Be
@glutamateglutamate5728
3 жыл бұрын
There is no coming back from this for an atheist.
@Edward-bm7vw
11 ай бұрын
Um, nope. These arguments have already been addressed
@Seruna9
9 ай бұрын
If you do want to disprove God, then you have to reason a contradiction in terms with God. We define God as a substance; if God is defined as a necessarily existing substance, then for you to deny the existence of said being amounts to nothing more than a contradiction in terms and is thus an impossible position to hold.@@Edward-bm7vw
@abdooljackson1399
8 ай бұрын
@@Edward-bm7vwthe objections for the contingency argument and even the kalam cosmological argument are very bad tbh with you
@Edward-bm7vw
8 ай бұрын
@@abdooljackson1399 No they highlight the logical fallacies involved with these arguments. They don't prove anything.
@abdooljackson1399
8 ай бұрын
@@Edward-bm7vw yeah and also those “logically fallacies” are misunderstandings of the arguments
@ahmadmitbi9543
8 ай бұрын
Assalamu alaikom. I have a question Consider the finite set {a,b,c,d} all the elements are dependant. d depends on c, c depends on b, b depends on a and a depends on b (circular set) One may argue that this set can't exist on its own as either a or b has to be posterior to the other in order for them to exist which will result in absurdity. But to play the devil's advocate, i would argue that a and b exist by virtue of themselves (eternal) and to continually ecist they depend on eachother at the same time How would you respond to that ?
@hasand74949
8 ай бұрын
It would lead to them being dependent and independent (eternal) at the same time which is a logical fallacy
@ahmadmitbi9543
7 ай бұрын
@@hasand74949 yeah thank you brother i have found a solution to that. I have another question : does dependency concern physical qualities only and if yes why do we have to adhere to that ?
@hasand74949
7 ай бұрын
@@ahmadmitbi9543 what was the solution you found? Mind explaining it to me for the above?
@hasand74949
7 ай бұрын
@@ahmadmitbi9543 not sure brother tbh. Best advice, book a session with sapience institute for free. They have a lighthouse mentoring session where all your questions will be answered by one of the team. Id advise you to book it and benefit from it. And let me know their answers to your questions if you do decide to book it
@ayeshayasir8665
5 ай бұрын
@@ahmadmitbi9543dependancy adheres EXTERNAL factors effecting an entities physical attributes. Or behavioral physical ontological changes, such as energy, fu damental particles or quantam fields. All of these can, though may ARGUE eternal, still are subject to changes and DEPENDANT upon physical factors determining their change.
@amuthi1
Жыл бұрын
If according to dependency Allah should be the first and eternal cosmic principle, but according to islamic theology Allah can in now way be in the universe. This seems to make little sense to me.
@halalmode36
Жыл бұрын
How?
@ashazaliazhar8058
Жыл бұрын
How do you infer that by dependency, Allah should be a part of the universe? The universe itself is dependent because it needs explanation for why it is the way it is when it could've been arranged in other ways. The best explanation for this is that God or Allah created the universe and determined its arrangement. Now suppose a carpenter makes a chair, it doesnt mean he becomes a part of the chair, similarly Allah can in no way be part of the universe, rather he is external to it. Hope that makes sense
@amuthi1
Жыл бұрын
@@ashazaliazhar8058 No it does not make sense. Logically arguing for a cosmological primary cause does not necessarily include extra-cosmic metaphysical stuff. At this point abrahamic monotheists jump to conclusions.
@fehmi35
8 ай бұрын
about the brick walls, I think composition fallacy has a fallacy. Having light parts and adding them together, we should just say that the whole is an addition of the light parts. If every human has mothers, relevant conclusion must be that humanity is made of humans who all have mothers. We can say heavy instead of addition of light parts but it is stupid to say that humanity has a mother if it is not meant as told above. So addition of contingent things is the addition of contingent things and nothing more. Why would a contingent set change and become a necessary ? It is as absurd as something coming from nothing. nothing+nothing+nothing is nothing or number + number + number is a number. contingent + contingent+ contingent is also contingent.
@ayeshayasir8665
2 ай бұрын
Yes exactly, anything berif of a quality cannot give.
@ansarali4976
2 жыл бұрын
What if we have "lots of independent things"? Not just one independent thing that is God ....can someone answer it
@MuhammadHassan200
2 жыл бұрын
Yep ALHAMDULLILAH answered
@MuhammadHassan200
2 жыл бұрын
In fact in this channel
@Just.A.Muslim
Жыл бұрын
Then they won’t be independent, since if you are referring to polytheism. Then they wouldn’t be all powerful by themselves they would need each other to do something. Like how Zeus for example, can’t be all powerful since he can’t create. And in polytheism, like with the pagan Arabs. They believe in Allah (swt), and with other cultures, they have a distorted form of Allah (swt). But with the main point being that he is the ultimate God, who is one and is All powerful.
@ashazaliazhar8058
Жыл бұрын
If there were lots of independent things, they would cease to be independent. Say there are 2 independent things- A and B. Now these 2 independent beings have some distinction between them and let's say A is different from B by way x. Now this begs the question why are they different from each other through way x and not way y. Therefore, they could've been different from each other in other ways, which needs explanation why they are different that way, therefore making both A and B contingent or dependant. Therefore there can be only one independent being ie Allah subhana wa taala, who is Ahad( one and only)
@randomuser8981
Жыл бұрын
@@ashazaliazhar8058 How can we say that the necessary being is Allah?
@Edward-bm7vw
11 ай бұрын
1:05 That's not true at all.
@----f
7 ай бұрын
It is, actually. I was friends with my associate professor at the University of Queensland, a PhD holder from the University of Oxford. We talked about this and I've looked at the studies for it. You should know that researchers and psychologists Justin L. Barret, Olivera Petrovich, Deborah Keleman, Paul Bloom, and more have confirmed the natural proclivity to believe in God. These are studies by atheists and peer-reviewed by atheists. Justin L. Barret (Oxford) has the biggest study on this, you should look into it
@----f
7 ай бұрын
Even in spite of contemporary psychological and sociological research, the anthropological and historical evidence supporting the natural inclination for humans around the world to believe in a creator and the supernatural is overwhelming. Atheists have always been and still are the minority. If anything, atheism is unnatural
@M_HassanJ
3 ай бұрын
It's islamic epistemology, and secondly how can you prove it's wrong? We have justification for this so.
@Edward-bm7vw
3 ай бұрын
@@M_HassanJ Because there's no evidence to support. It goes against everything we know. Islam just made it all up. It's a complete lie. It goes against the history of religion, against human psychology, neurology, literally everything.
@ahmadmitbi9543
8 ай бұрын
Why can't an independent being become dependent ?
@sultanmufleh2905
7 ай бұрын
because if your independant then to become dependant you would have to reduce and reducing an independent thing would mean it wasn't independent in the first place. Its like saying the most powerful being lost to someone more powerful than him which made him not the most powerful anymore. Those are two contradictory things.
@sultanmufleh2905
7 ай бұрын
An independant being is by defintion a person who can't be overcame, defeated, reduced or cease to exist because the independent being is by definition necessary for existence and can therefore not lose its power by something which depends on it.
@DBLUE-bo2qe
3 жыл бұрын
I'll be honest thats what I always want hahahaha, a quick way to do it all 0:05🤣🤜🤛, The way Your smiling, I feel like You know Aki
@DBLUE-bo2qe
3 жыл бұрын
😂, what A Luvly Brother E is Mā Sha Allah
@kaleemazad5475
Жыл бұрын
Hi. I would like to know why or how the PSR (principle sufficient Reason ) is true. Why do ALL contingent existence need and explanation. This is the only part of the argument I Don't understand.
@ashazaliazhar8058
Жыл бұрын
Basically, all things require explanation Contingent things are not self explanatory but depend on an external existence to explain them The Necessary existence is self explanatory and doesn't need an external explanation. Now there can't be only Contingent things because there would be an infinite regress and you would never be able to explain anything. Therefore a Necessary being has to exist upon which everything else depends on for explanation.
@kaleemazad5475
Жыл бұрын
@@ashazaliazhar8058 thanks l. But an atheist could say " maby there could be contingent things that don't have an explanation or reason for there existence".
@dwsdd0851
Жыл бұрын
@@kaleemazad5475 this is a self-contradictory statement since “contingent” means that it needs explanation
@ashazaliazhar8058
Жыл бұрын
@@kaleemazad5475 that's like saying there could be failed students that passed a test. Its contradictory
@matswessling6600
4 ай бұрын
@@ashazaliazhar8058no thing in reality is self explanatory.
Пікірлер: 54