Twitter follow for updates, memes and more! x.com/AttyTomGrieve
@SoloRenegade
27 күн бұрын
according to the ATF court precedents, the ATF argued that any weapon in common military use is beyond ATF authority to regulate. SBRs, SBS, machine guns, and silencers are all in widespread military use and have been for decades, and thus beyond the ATF authority to regulate. This is Per the arguments ATF won court cases on.
@justind7270
27 күн бұрын
Did you make an oopsie saying the 5th circuit issued an injunction? Everything I’ve heard said it was a vacature and the atf had 30 days to appeal? How can 8th circuit say the case needs to go back to trial court to receive an injunction if the rule has already been vacated in its entirety pending an appeal? Or is every other KZitem gun lawyer wrong and it really was only a preliminary injunction?
@bm5298
26 күн бұрын
excuse me please; can we get someone with a law degree and a gavel to define 4 words individually? word 1: shall word 2: not word 3: be word 4: infringed you know for a little thing called... an amendment. it needs to be walked through as if a 3 year old needs to understand it because the "reasonable interpretation" is anything but reasonable
@pb7087
26 күн бұрын
Didnt the 5th vacate the rule a few months ago?
@pb7087
26 күн бұрын
@justind7270 Seriously, pretty sure the 5th vacated the rule.
@joelgrimes7591
27 күн бұрын
I never wanted an AR pistol until the government said I couldn’t have one.
@waterboy239
27 күн бұрын
Their amazing
@Primal-Rage
27 күн бұрын
@@waterboy239 they're*
@EverythingFilmmaking
27 күн бұрын
Get you two of them.
@Zulu55far
27 күн бұрын
That is how it works, tell people they can not buy something and they stampede to buy it.
@Macsauce313
27 күн бұрын
@joelgrimes7591 now I want 3. 🤣 1 to represent each branch of corrupt government 🤣
@Uncleprepper1
27 күн бұрын
They were already told they can’t do this. That they can no longer make laws and call them rules. The ATF no longer needs to exist.
@gifthorse3675
27 күн бұрын
It was never needed
@Unknown-qp9ur
27 күн бұрын
The ATF who circumvent the law all the time is mad that people follow the law in a way to circumvent it.
@ptx8716
27 күн бұрын
But it will, even under trump. If he would promise to abolish the atf I'd vote for him. But alas it doesn't matter. Kamalala will try full on confiscation and trump gave us red flag laws.
@akeeperofoddknowledge4956
27 күн бұрын
The ATF was created during Prohibition to ensure that alcohol, tobacco and firearms had the proper tax stamps to ensure that the taxes were paid on them . Nowhere in their original charter is it specified that they are a paramilitary unit or a legislative body.
@bookkeeper1995
27 күн бұрын
"The term “rifle” means a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and made or remade to use the energy of the explosive in a fixed cartridge to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for each single pull of the trigger, and shall include any such weapon which may be readily restored to fire a fixed cartridge." By definition, braced pistols as used are short barrel rifles
@goosecouple
27 күн бұрын
"The 2A doesn't say you need permission from the AFT."
@jer1014t2th
27 күн бұрын
Not them either lol
@gifthorse3675
27 күн бұрын
Explain the NFA, GCA, and Hughes amendment?
@goosecouple
27 күн бұрын
@@gifthorse3675 "Complain to the world police."
@bored588
27 күн бұрын
it says shall not be infringed, ALL gun laws are infringements.
@MichaelSlattery-sh8vl
27 күн бұрын
Exactly correct!
@paulrapp613
27 күн бұрын
ATF is incapable of showing their work. Rephrase: ATF is incapable.
@bmw328igearhead
27 күн бұрын
Real Eyes: They are incompetent, so can't.
@ImprovmanZero
27 күн бұрын
Ruby and Waco teacb us that
@ftn5546
27 күн бұрын
The NFA is unconstitutional. The APA is unconstitutional.
@ChiefMac59
27 күн бұрын
The ATF, FBI and DOJ are unconstitutional
@alansloan7784
27 күн бұрын
And the GCA is unconstitutional, as well.
@ftn5546
27 күн бұрын
@@alansloan7784 100%
@tyeblaskovich668
26 күн бұрын
So is the Hughes Amendment.
@1216Rocker
26 күн бұрын
The ATF is unconstitutional.
@TUCOtheratt
27 күн бұрын
The government has 2 priorities. 1.) protect/expand it's power. Legislative/administrative overreach 2.)avoid being overthrown. Judicial bones tossed to the public
@workingmansdead44-ug8hl
27 күн бұрын
NO,,they are here to help,hahahahahahaaa
@jimsteinway695
27 күн бұрын
EXACTLY
@cowboy1165
27 күн бұрын
And they're doing a bang-up job. How do we get back to that government in 1789? 😂
@PoliticallyInsensitive
26 күн бұрын
@@cowboy1165 1776
@markr.1329
25 күн бұрын
@@PoliticallyInsensitive NO joke where we the people were the actual government not bureaucrats like the English did. I am old ok I understand that. But when I was a kid there were not people trying to say anything about control. They knew better they saw what both england and Germany had done when controlling the firearms. They did not think this crap was even possible. But here we are back in 1770’s England and 1930’s Germany. Now England is once again locking people up for speech. Hmm things repeat in history. Imagine that.
@michaela6147
27 күн бұрын
I don’t give two shits with what the ATF thinks
@gifthorse3675
27 күн бұрын
No but they really care about you
@michaela6147
27 күн бұрын
@@gifthorse3675 😂
@bigjon576
27 күн бұрын
@@gifthorse3675and we don't care about them or what they want us to do.
@OFFICIALUND
27 күн бұрын
That's what Bryan Malinowski said, too. Now he's dead because they killed him.
@michaela6147
27 күн бұрын
@@OFFICIALUND Is sad but has nothing to do with me. He handled it his own way
@Soloong_Gaybowzer
27 күн бұрын
The ATF has been using "it's not a firearm, so we're gonna ban it" for decades and very few have challenged the ATF on the grounds that if it's not a firearm, alcohol or tobacco the ATF shouldn't be regulating it.
@davefletch3063
27 күн бұрын
They should not be regulating anything, much less firearms
@broncobra
27 күн бұрын
Same with silencers.
@codyharney2997
27 күн бұрын
It's a trap. If it is considered an arm, it's protected by the 2a, if not an arm, out of the purview of the atf and not eligible for regulation
@broncobra
27 күн бұрын
You call the ATF. They say FBI does background? You call the FBI, the say that's ATF jurisdiction. Both say they are a call center and can't give out info. LOL. So go onto the websites, where you will spend HOURS trying to find what you need. Try filing a challenge? They denied me over something 26 years ago? No jail, no criminal charges. FUCK THEM BOTH!
@ShaneZettelmier
27 күн бұрын
You ended this with the Thomas Jefferson “, here’s another “ tyranny is defined by that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry”
@ThanksStJoseph
27 күн бұрын
The national firearms act needs to be repealed!
@lonerider6951
25 күн бұрын
Along with the Hughes Amendment of 1986
@noneshere
23 күн бұрын
I grew up a welder and machinist but I refuse to get on a nfa list for anything I've created.
@robertwilliams1254
22 күн бұрын
As I recall, when Kennedy was murdered in 1963, the fed laws developed there after.... used his murder as a reason
@chipvtx1800
27 күн бұрын
The atf should catch actual dangerous criminals instead of inventing rules to turn good citizens into felons.
@choalithikanthe2422
25 күн бұрын
The ATF should be disbanded and prosecuted. The Police should catch actual dangerous criminals.
@bespokearms
25 күн бұрын
Citizens can choose to become an American and gain protection by the US Constitution.
@sunriseboy4837
25 күн бұрын
Part of the Marxist push. Not to mention the various District Court judges are closet Marxists.
@ineedmoneysp
24 күн бұрын
The atf should not have guns go missing making more criminals with weapons.
@stevenfeil7079
23 күн бұрын
The government LIKES criminals. Why should it put its partners in crime in prision?
@whitetrashdunham132
27 күн бұрын
Ban the 1934 national firearms act. Screw their "regulations". Regulations are not laws. Doom on you ATF.
@user-mm2tn5ti4n
27 күн бұрын
atf discriminates against people w physical disabilities...why isnt the ADA people going after them?
@Hey_you_______x
27 күн бұрын
Cause they tarded
@WildManActual
27 күн бұрын
The ATF doesn't want me to own/shoot weapons with less lethality. Got it.
@mrwayne5158
27 күн бұрын
Its more like, they dont want me using guns with more versatility.
@ultrablue2
27 күн бұрын
Actually, they want you to be less safe and less accurate, meaning bullets everywhere.
@stevesmith9151
25 күн бұрын
ATF should be a convenience shop, not a government agency. These criminals need to be defunded and jailed under RICO laws, defund the ATF now.
@yatyas
27 күн бұрын
5-10 years! For “not paying to play” so basically the enemy is already here and should be dealt with! Shall not be infringed!!!!
@curlybill3966
27 күн бұрын
We started out with no Federal statutes with the states to regulate themselves. There are now over 5000 Federal felony statutes. Something is wrong here and out of control.
@roddecker1900
25 күн бұрын
Are all felonies " criminal law? I don't think so.
@javabean215
27 күн бұрын
If I woke up tomorrow and heard that Garland and Dettelbach were unemployed...well, let's just say I wouldn't lose any sleep over that.
@fredziffel3443
27 күн бұрын
At this point, I no longer care what the government has to say about my rights. Not that I ever really "cared"... I just strive for awareness as it applies to the moment when my 2A rights critically apply to maintaining ALL OF MY RIGHTS.
@Bob-cx4ze
27 күн бұрын
There is really no reason that the ATF would fight this hard for a law (SBRs), that is an accidental artifact of a failed pistol ban, other than to stick a thumb in the eye of legal gun owners. Happy for someone to propose an alternative theory.
@flimflam7271
27 күн бұрын
Easy, every time they make a rule, we have to fight it, it's like having a law passed for just 3 years and millions spent for them to deploy the next foockery
@DarqEagle56
25 күн бұрын
It is a portion of the groundwork being laid by the government to facilitate complete government control over the citizenry. The strategy? Allow congress to invent taxes to drain our ability to fight SUSTAINED legal battles. Then, pass Unconstitutional laws to force MORE financial hardship, while using OUR TAXES to fund the destruction our rights. Finally, when WE can no longer defend against this TYRANNICAL OVERLORD CLASS, the citizenry are COMPLETELY SUBJUGATED to the wills and whims of the TOC, ushering in the Age of CCC. Complete Citizenry Compliance.
@benhiggerson5904
27 күн бұрын
If they would stop wasting money on all these ridiculous attacks on the rights of citizens they could probably fix some real problems.
@stevepace83
27 күн бұрын
Created by the same expert that couldn't remove the slide from a Glock pistol.
@kaffir1776
27 күн бұрын
He has great looks for radio, maybe he just hasn't found the right platform yet ?
@bobgaines8964
25 күн бұрын
It looked to me that the dipshit could not even rack the slide.
@sutoriimmortal2177
27 күн бұрын
The government and its cronies should be horrified of the people they serve. It is the only way to keep evil in check, fear. You can't reason or barter with evil, you have to hold it at bay with either fear or force.
@TheUnojoe2
27 күн бұрын
Sounds like the big G is some type of fail-parade of clowns. They are really pushing the envelope of the “fail fast” concept, but they misunderstood the most basic parts. Do it wrong? Consequences. Do it right? progress and cooperation. I guess that’s a challenging concept for un-disciplined political ladder climbers.
@gscop1683
27 күн бұрын
I dont routinely go to the "AFT" website....nor am I required to....so how IS this BS "Public Notice?"
@ElChacal7
27 күн бұрын
Now that chevron deference was struck down, ATF should have no authority. Either congress enacts a law or nothing ATF says matters.
@DerAptrgangr
26 күн бұрын
No. That's not what that means at all.
@jamsheed03
11 күн бұрын
@@DerAptrgangrWhat does it mean then
@DerAptrgangr
11 күн бұрын
@@jamsheed03 Chevron Deference meant that courts had to presume that experts appointed to fill government agencies were experts, and that they should be deferred to when there is a question regarding the law vs government agency ruling. With that struck down, judges no longer have to defer to agency appointees automatically. But the ATF can still make rulings/interpret relevant legislation. It just gives them less automatic authority in legal cases. For the ATF, this is good. For many government agencies, this is bad.
@kevinfidler8074
27 күн бұрын
I remember the back and fourth on this something like 10 years ago, when someone asked the atf if they're allowed to shoulder an ar with a pistol brace. "Sure, of course you can" then a week later someone who had a clue what they were talking about in the atf "no, you can't do that" then they back tracked again and said "yes you can shoulder an ar pistol with a brace" Now they've changed their minds and decided it's an sbr. Is the atf a woman? Seriously
@ryanthorne5432
27 күн бұрын
Many in the government can’t define what a woman is.
@kevinfidler8074
27 күн бұрын
@ryanthorne5432 True, and chances are if the 87,000 irs agents dug deep on politicians there would be a lot of money laundering cases.
@kevinfidler8074
27 күн бұрын
@@ryanthorne5432 Seems my reply was taken down. YT is clearly "mockingbird" if you know what I mean.
@Hey_you_______x
27 күн бұрын
@@kevinfidler8074m(k-ultra)ockingbird
@codyharney2997
27 күн бұрын
I believe flippancy and back and forth destroys their legal credibility and shouldn't be allowed to weigh in on something they don't even know what their stance is Ambiguity in law doesn't mean everyone in the Grey area are criminals. It means legislation needs more work to refine the law. Not unelected bureaucrats
@01Sassoon
21 күн бұрын
The crazy thing is, if every gun owner ignored the NFA/Brace rule/SBR tax/Suppressor tax, the Law would be nullified.
@FabianStrategy-76
27 күн бұрын
ATF continues to just move the goal posts in order to win. One relevant "judgment" they made regarding the pistol brace rule comes from an open letter dated MAR 21, 2017 (Re: Reversal of ATF Open Letter on the Redesign of Stabilizing Braces). Without quoting the entire letter, the key decision comes from the final sentence which reads as follows: "Therefore, an NFA firearm has not necessarily been made when the device is not re-configured for use as a shoulder stock - even if the attached firearm happens to be fired from the shoulder." They continually contradict themselves and change the rules as they go along.
@jcarne1015
27 күн бұрын
Thanks, Tom. When the ‘Final Rule’ was published, I contacted SB Tactical to offer a little financial support for their legal challenge. They thanked me, but suggested I support the 2A organizations that were also girding for legal battle instead. I had already joined several of them, so I sent a few bucks to FRAC.
@AMX86
27 күн бұрын
I never found a use for an AR pistol for myself, but those who want one MUST have one as they see fit. NO govt permission, no govt restriction.
@ChiefMac59
27 күн бұрын
It was designed for disabled veterans that have lost use of an arm to be able to fire AR-15 pistols. So their ruling violates the Americans with Disabilities Act
@handlesaredumb1
27 күн бұрын
I have an AR pistol, 10.5in, in 350 legend for hunting from a saddle or climber. Much easier to control and move around with.
@jimhalke
27 күн бұрын
Home defense, due to short length for CQB
@MrBlahblahblee
27 күн бұрын
9mm ARs are the best use and form for an AR pistol because it experiences increased performance compared to its shorter handgun versions. A 5.56 AR pistol doesn’t make much sense to me
@handlesaredumb1
27 күн бұрын
@MrBlahblahblee 10.5in 350 legend, 1000ft/lbs at 120yds with Hornady 165gr ftx, so "humane" for deer out to 120yds. 350 legend pistol is basically a super 9mm. It out performs 9mm in every way except recoil, but if you can't handle 350L recoil, you(in general not you specifically) have other issues.
@SeanBook001
27 күн бұрын
*ATF pulls out tape measure* "Is that an SBR???" "Are those type 4 plates?"
@brad2340
25 күн бұрын
Funny😮
@OpenCarryUSMC
25 күн бұрын
My door mat say come back with a warrant or level four plates
@macabremofo945
23 күн бұрын
@OpenCarryUSMC that's badass
@OpenCarryUSMC
22 күн бұрын
@@macabremofo945 Amazon sells them
@SeanBook001
19 күн бұрын
@@OpenCarryUSMC I now know what kind of doormat I want
@RealEstateEntrepreneur
27 күн бұрын
So we have to pay to have our "right" to keep and bear arms supposedly guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment.
@davidr7333
27 күн бұрын
The right to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed - but we can tax that right.... So we need to tax all newspapers, news broadcasts, and any other media.
@juliusj4104
27 күн бұрын
It’s 2024, and guess what? Pistol braces are still the ATF's favorite nightmare. The "Frack vs. Garland" case is like the latest season of a legal drama no one asked for. We're talking about whether slapping a pistol brace on your AR turns it into a prison ticket. The Eighth Circuit is now playing referee. The rule’s on life support, but it’s still kicking... barely. Who knew gun laws could have more twists than a soap opera? Stay tuned for more legal hijinks! 🤣
@bookkeeper1995
27 күн бұрын
Yes, when you make a short barrel rifle illegally you go to jail, shocker
@TheUnojoe2
27 күн бұрын
The ATF needs to be charged with embezzlement of government funds for continuing to push for something known to be unconstitutional, and knowingly using tax money for that purpose.
@bookkeeper1995
27 күн бұрын
@@TheUnojoe2 People seem to be confused about what "unconstitutional" means. You seem to be under the impression that's a call you make. It isn't.
@pjbiggleswerth8903
25 күн бұрын
@@bookkeeper1995it's not an sbr you chudd
@pjbiggleswerth8903
25 күн бұрын
@@bookkeeper1995it's a call the constitution makes, and, you're a bootlicker. How's that working out fir you?
@Clearanceman2
27 күн бұрын
They keep using our money to appeal.
@TheRomanTribune
22 күн бұрын
Taxes must cease
@carlsorensen8360
22 күн бұрын
The NFA is what needs to be challenged in the supreme Court😮
@chtomlin
25 күн бұрын
The term is infringe...not regulate... these arbitrary roles infringe on our rights
@jeffbroders9781
27 күн бұрын
The biggest joke about short barreled firearms is bad legislative mistakes! The NFA was originally intended to make pistols illegal. The concern at the time was that they didn't want people cutting down the barrels of rifles and shotgun to get around the law. With all the back and forth, and realizing that they couldn't make pistols illegal because it was unconstitutional, they forgot to take that section out of the act before it was passed.
@junicohen7918
27 күн бұрын
They must have "forgot" to fix it that session too
@ghostpunkkilla
27 күн бұрын
Yeah, "forgot"
@codyharney2997
27 күн бұрын
Miller set precedent that since the sawed off shotgun wasn't fit for military use, therefore not covered by the 2a. So any weapon the military uses is protected by the 2a.
@CustomWeldingandFab
27 күн бұрын
@@codyharney2997thank you, glad someone is paying attention. Notice not one gun rights group is using this argument to abolish the NFA? Do any of them really stand for the 2A?
@gbear1005
27 күн бұрын
I think we agree ... "forgot"
@samueljardine3402
27 күн бұрын
This is so dumb and will prevent literally 0 crimes. It's easier to install a short barrel on a rifle than it is to install a pistol brace.
@garywillis9528
27 күн бұрын
And may I add? The "fixes" testified to by the Director of the ATF to Congress do not agree with what the rule said!
@frankmcgowan9457
27 күн бұрын
*_ANY_* weapon issued to a member of the Armed Services of the United States of America or functionally similar to those so issued is legal for *_any_* free citizen to own and possess without tax or registration. _Miller (1939)_ ruled that 2A did not protect short barreled shotguns as there was no connection between such weapons and the uniformed services and, hence, no militia use for them. That is no longer the case. SCOTUS should go through the list of NFA regulated items and the list of arms and equipment DOD buys and issuex and simply remove from NFA authority all that appear on the DOD list.
@Killianwsh
25 күн бұрын
If the court doesn't slap the ATF it will spark a war.
@pickeljarsforhillary102
27 күн бұрын
I trust the ATF.... to embarrass themselves.
@michaeldavila2325
27 күн бұрын
The ATF😂 What in the unnatural hell is wrong the the legions of idiots at the ATF? Pitcher pages, LOL! 😂
@bigdumbtruck
27 күн бұрын
well first of there isnt legions of them. they only have 815 officers, and half of those work specifically on firearms covering the entire nation. the rest of the staff are administrative, beaurocratic or legal
@robgrey6183
27 күн бұрын
Diversity hires.
@robertmcgee7083
27 күн бұрын
When’s the atf returning the stolen FRTs?
@thatsthewayitgoes9
27 күн бұрын
I know all the 1000 details and infinite language and knat’s ass laws are fun and important to you in the legal community. But, the average citizen is getting sick of this. To be between unsettled unconstitutional fiats and knowing what’s legal while being threatened by our government with death by ATF/FBI death squads, 10 years in prison, thousands of $dollars$ of possible legal costs…. This is not right . This is harassment by our government. This is intimidation by our government. This is so convoluted and confusing and dangerous. Stop the damn merry go round, stop high jacking my country, my life, the lives of my family & neighbors. I know it’s not you Tom; but because we don’t know who’s doing this, only shows this is out of hand with no one accountable. The People need a directory of every damn government employee by name, address, SS#, location, job, their bosses, we need references EVERY TIME to a person in this government employee directory. We need accountability by individuals for every game they are playing.
@alansloan7784
27 күн бұрын
Having a publicly accessible national registry of all government employees, while both necessary and desirable to discourage criminal actions by bureaucracies, probably won't happen: a complete removal of such agencies is more likely.
@jamesbell7220
27 күн бұрын
Tom, always my thanks for the links.
@geekchameleon
27 күн бұрын
The ATF gave the initial approval for the pistol brace to be manufactured and sold, unequivocally stating that there was no interpretation under which the ATF had authority to regulate them. That determination held for a decade. The ATF knew many manufacturers were producing and selling them. Millions of them. If the court in _Caetano_ said that roughly 200,000 stun guns in private possession equaled "in common use," how can the ATF argue that a couple million pistol braces don't amount to common use? It's like adverse possession. The government might not like it, but they allowed it to happen as a matter of course, and it crossed the threshold, making the government impotent.
@cowboyx9380
26 күн бұрын
Upwards of 40 MILLION pistol braces have been sold in the US….thats common use all day long!
@wesleyallan7436
26 күн бұрын
ATF go screw your selves no body pays any attention your bill shit anymore no fiction just fact! 😢
@jslaughterofthesoul4939
17 күн бұрын
Mine came with a copy of a signed letter of approval by the then director of the ATF
@priznuruvchrist4549
27 күн бұрын
The fact ATF was providing form 4 Amnesty is enough for the courts to consider an action is final.
@dakotah4866
27 күн бұрын
Sorry doesn't the Chevron defense have these people follow the law which is the Constitution federal and state. they're not in the Constitution shouldn't they just be you know disbanded.
@marcush4741
27 күн бұрын
The chevron ruling didn't change things the way people think it did. Under chevron, courts were mandated to go by the rules put forth by experts, so long as their definotion was plausible or undefined under the law. Now, citizens can present another plausible interpretation, and the courts have to pick the most plausible interpretation. The EPA, as an example, can say "congress gave us the authority to regulate acceptable heavy metal levels in water going to river water. We set it at X parts per million. We've increased it because we're seeing higher lead levels in water". If that rate is a reasonable change from previous years, theyre likely to succeed in court. Especially if they can show that these levels are required to prevent an increase in heavy metal exposure. But if they make changes so drastic that it's impossible for anybody to follow it without facing fines... citizens would likely prevail by saying that the changes are essentially a ban. A ban which congress did not enact. Agencies still have some authority. We didnt go from Chevron to rule of lenity (ie, if there is an interpretation favorable to the citizen, that is the ruling which the courts must take). We went from Chevron to "may the best argument win".
@dakotah4866
27 күн бұрын
Yeah well the funny part is and now they have to follow the Constitution now. here's the funny part none of them are a part of the Constitution or were they created out of the 19 things that we allowed the government to create as our system.
@dakotah4866
27 күн бұрын
You also have article 5 of The Constitution and marbury vs Madison.
@dakotah4866
27 күн бұрын
For any law that comes into conflict with the Constitution is null and void.
@graysonstephens
27 күн бұрын
Unfortunately the NFA, GCA, and FOPA, are law and remain unchallenged on constitutional grounds, despite materially contradicting existing caselaw concerning constitutional rights. Until those are struck down, this tyranny will remain.
@CustomWeldingandFab
27 күн бұрын
They wouldn’t get away with these things if we had sheriffs that did their jobs and local militias that actually did proper militia work.
@herbderbler1585
25 күн бұрын
If the ATF wants to insist that braces are the same as stocks, then they are simultaneously confirming millions of short barreled rifles in common use across the nation contributing virtually nothing to gun crime. If they're clearly not "unusually dangerous" then why are they restricted?
@stickman-1
27 күн бұрын
16" ? So what magic happens at 15.99"? The NFA of '34 should have been booted out long ago for being arbitrary. Who decided that 16" is the magic number for a rifle? But a pistol? Revolver? They are perfectly okay at 1". This has been absurd from day one. The number 16 is arbitrary and has no foundation for regulation.
@roddecker1900
25 күн бұрын
Heard ruby ridge was over 1/4 inch on shot gun barrel that was clinton and the gin sop ag. She drank lots vodca
@jaydanbaker123
27 күн бұрын
Im still trying to figure out why my human rights are up for committee vote?
@dennisl4000
27 күн бұрын
Tom, as always great presentation and information.
@AttyTomGrieve
27 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it Dennis!
@Zulu55far
22 күн бұрын
A pistol brace is just a piece of plastic. Politically incorrect gun furniture.
@64samsky
27 күн бұрын
F the ATF!
@k-man1481
24 күн бұрын
Shall not be infringed! Every firearm is legal and can not be limited
@bullbarnes9300
27 күн бұрын
Actually, Tom, I get the feeling lately that Congress, et al, ARE very interested in "rear surface areas", specifically ours, the people, with forceful penetrative intent!
@Gotime_project
12 күн бұрын
ATF has no power to make laws and are not to be seen as an authority , period
@TheWalterKurtz
27 күн бұрын
Now I'm even more confused.
@rogerfair1756
27 күн бұрын
Well done Tom I’m with you in that I am constantly amazed at just how far the government is willing to go in their efforts to strip us of our rights. All our rights are evidently under attack. Not just the 2nd but the 1st, 4th, 5th,,,,,, the list just goes on. I pray for our nation.
@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle
27 күн бұрын
"Congress cannot possibly pass a law that covers every possibility" This is exactly as intended by the founders. The solution is an amendment to the law through Congress. The idea the executive branch gets to alter (yes, it is changing if it adds anything to it) is a violation of the seperation of powers and would be a foreign concept for the founding fathers.
@user-db2vn4gy5k
19 сағат бұрын
It's time to start removing any authority from the atf and hold them in Contempt of Congress.
@GadzWolf11
25 күн бұрын
>ATF announces "final ruling" and gives everyone 90 days to destroy or modify their braced pistols >ATF makes amendments to the "final ruling" demanding imported braced firearms like AK pistols need to be destroyed or turned in, not just modified/brace removed >Court puts injunctions on the "final ruling" to prevent enforcement >ATF pivots to claim that the "final ruling" is actually tax related >Court puts nationwide injunction on the "final ruling" >ATF releases slideshow displaying what sorts of things are illegal in their "final ruling" >ATF claims their "final ruling" can't be challenged, claiming they haven't actually begun enforcing it yet The ATF is a deeply unserious agency.
@chadthomas9678
24 күн бұрын
Excellent analysis
@timwilliam8045
27 күн бұрын
Can't we just redefine "shoulder?"
@daftpanda6533
27 күн бұрын
"Excuse me Mr. ATF, my shoulder actually identifies as the middle finger."
@robertthomas5906
27 күн бұрын
Why is this a thing? I thought Chevron was gone. They have no authority to make rules like this, right?
@No-One-of-Consequence
27 күн бұрын
At what point is the ATF engaging in ex post facto legislation (since Congress delegated its authority to the ATF, and probably not legally so, their regulations would be taken here as legislation)? Ex post facto legislation is clearly unconstitutional, and yet, I never hear about anyone utilizing that theory when they bring actions against them.
@sanyihegedu
25 күн бұрын
ATF legal sophistry is a massive waste of time and money!
@sapp6401
27 күн бұрын
Doesn’t matter the subject; when the government is involved, it is always about money and power.
@umat6991
27 күн бұрын
The Ti-84?! What is that, some sort of assault calculator?
@daftpanda6533
27 күн бұрын
Ssssh, the ATF will ban those next! 🤣 Now I have to remove my pistol brace from my TI-84.
@lrsghost5
24 күн бұрын
Regulatory bodies no longer have the power to interpret the law as ruled in the SCOTUS case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. None of these "rulings" are constitutional
@13BGunBunny
27 күн бұрын
Keep your eyes and ears open. The ATF might try more stupid stuff. Thanks for the info.
@daftpanda6533
27 күн бұрын
Might? Hmm... forecast is 100% chance the ATF will continue on with their BS. Afterall, they need to justify their continued existence.
@andrewmattila1918
27 күн бұрын
Shall Not Be Infringed!! 2024!!
@daemonmcfarland2877
27 күн бұрын
I'm confused! Are pistol braces legal right now?
@gregsmith5695
27 күн бұрын
Maybe?
@justind7270
27 күн бұрын
That depends…. Tell the atf you have one and find out 🫣
@frank64409
27 күн бұрын
What if it is a smooth bore? If it doesn't have rifling, it's not a rifle, right?
@Omnonymous
27 күн бұрын
Pistol without rifling is an AOW. Different section of the NFA
@Unknown-qp9ur
27 күн бұрын
Or it's a short barreled shotgun when less than 18 inches.
@rickluttrell5529
27 күн бұрын
ATF Crazy. Nailed it. You can stop right there. Nothing more required.
@ChiefMac59
27 күн бұрын
Okay I have a question - SBRs make a rifle more concealable because they have been shortened. Adding a brace to a pistol makes it longer so it's not as concealable as it was. WTF?
@alansloan7784
27 күн бұрын
Logic isn't what they go by. Brute force is. (Remember Bryan Malinowski.)
@robertlane367
13 күн бұрын
Then the first thing they bring up in any court room is..."ignorance of the law is not a excuse for breaking it"
@interstellarsurfer
27 күн бұрын
Firearms Unknown did great work mocking the ATF powerpoint slides. 👍
@matthewwilliams3835
22 күн бұрын
I thought the Chevron deference did away with agencies having the ability to interpret the law on their own and forces them to again defer to the courts
@MarsMan1
27 күн бұрын
Oh God! Abolish the ATF.
@russcook2355
24 күн бұрын
Tom thanks for the great information and your insight on the topic and explaining it so the average person can understand the situation 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@ftn5546
27 күн бұрын
The Office clips keep making me laugh.
@jimsteinway695
27 күн бұрын
Every one of ATFs rules and definitions, are direct infringements to the 2A. Period.
@michaelfulcher6390
27 күн бұрын
A short barreled rifle is still just a rifle. An AR pistol in just a short barreled rifle, which is still just a rifle. All of it is 100% legal to own without government permission.
@Beardsandbars
27 күн бұрын
No, an AR pistol is a pistol, period.
@NPC-HonoraryRooftopKorean
27 күн бұрын
My AR identifies as “other” … at least that’s what 4473 says.
@michaelfulcher6390
27 күн бұрын
@@Beardsandbars You can call it a "pistol" if you want.
@ilkhanli
27 күн бұрын
Mine are called "arms"
@michaelvaldez5177
23 күн бұрын
I find you breath of fresh air! Not like the click baiting lawyers on the west coast! Thanks!
@carlthejexican7551
27 күн бұрын
ATF approving braces and then saying they're meant to circumvent sbr laws lol also padded buffer tubes exist.
@user-pv6hd4zu1h
27 күн бұрын
When it comes down to the brass tacks people are going to do what they need to do to maintain their freedoms.
@lawrancehunsaker9988
27 күн бұрын
So since the photos on on the slide shows doesn’t show any actual pistol calibers such as 9mm or 45 ACP, does that mean that those calibers would not be determined to be SBR’s?
@justind7270
27 күн бұрын
Notice 90% don’t even have sights? How is it intended to be shouldered when you’d have the same accuracy as hip firing or using a single point bungee sling to maintain tension? 🤷🏻♂️
@believe722
25 күн бұрын
Very good information, very well said.
@Vibe77Guy
27 күн бұрын
An agency can not "clarify" an unconstitutional legislation into constitutional compliance. There is no clause in the 2nd amendment allowing the NFA to be constitutional.
@MmmKimboSlice
16 күн бұрын
Thanks Tom for making this VERY confusing ruling less confusing for AR owners, AR pistoles, etc. I can't keep up. ATF don't know what they're talking about. Basically, most all military personnel, grandparents, are going to prison.
@lordofpain3476
25 күн бұрын
The only Constitutional Right that specifically says " Shall not be infringed " is the very same one that they constantly infringe and regulate .
@RealEstateEntrepreneur
27 күн бұрын
So we have to pay to have your "right" to keep and bear arms supposedly guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment.
@BruceCross
27 күн бұрын
They can send people to prison, but it's not a "final agency action?"
@ineedmoneysp
24 күн бұрын
Something really needs to be done about the ATF and other agencies cause they are told by the supreme courts of all places that they can’t make there own laws or rules and congress has to do it and then they go about ignoring it to do what they want to do without a care in the world. It’s absolutely insane.
@user-kc1xg1bg2w
27 күн бұрын
No No Nooooo How long must we deal with this ATF in denial.....
Пікірлер: 1 М.