I agree with Professor Berhanu Amharic and Oromgna should be the Official Language of Ethiopia and it can easly be implimanted now. No special forces needed ouside of our National Defense Forces. It is time to disolve that institution.
Pro. We love u but we will go for Dr. Abiy. He is amazing guys for Ethiopia. We don't miss Dr. Abiy. Such kind of leader happen rarely. But u will get sit and do your part in raising Ethiopia with Dr. Abiy.
ATO YELKALE , HE TRIED TO DISMANTLE ETHIOPIA? NOW HE IS COMING WITH THE NEW POLITICAL GAME? 50 REGIONS? ZRWER ALU ENJI ALESHESHUM
@workigudissa2926
3 жыл бұрын
I have respect all you but this time when Ethiopia have so many problem and enemy no need to bring new government than dr. Abiy so now a day our choose is p.p pary who has some expirance.
As a society we'd need one national language like amharic, however that doesn't mean we can't have more than one official language.
@amiromar3861
3 жыл бұрын
@@MrDDNAT we don't want Amharic. Amharic is for Amhara!
@MrDDNAT
3 жыл бұрын
@@amiromar3861 well that's not true, amharic is not just for amhara, amharic is not gonna go anywhere, it's a language that's widely spoken and embraced by almost each region of the country except the fact that extremists are trying to come up with a new narrations. As a nation, amharic should continue to be a national language and is the most popular language in the country, however adding other languages to the list of official languages would also be important. It's also important to note that since ethinic extremists don't want to speak or use amharic, doesn't mean the majority of Ethiopians do want the same. It's baffling to me that while majority of the people are still dirt poor, these ethinic extremists group focus on such issues for their own ego or political gains, rather than working with Abiy to move the country forward. The country should focus on development and use its youthful citizens to transform its economy. Ethiopia has a huge potential to develop and meet its middle class target much sooner one may expect.
@amiromar3861
3 жыл бұрын
@@MrDDNAT keep Amharic language for yourself not for us Stop Being Ignorant.
@MrDDNAT
3 жыл бұрын
@@amiromar3861 Well nobody is asking you speak or use Amharic, get your head out of your behind and be objective. It looks like your head is filled with hate, TPLF tried to make Amharic disappear as much as possible, however more people use Amharic more than ever now. You are probably trying to live a fabricated story of 150-200 yrs old, don't waste your time, life is so short by itself. Look forward instead of dwelling on things which never happened.
አሃዳዊ ሥርዓትና እጅግ መጥፎ ጎኑ 1. A unitary government is essentially an oligarchy. A unitary system of government consolidates all of its power within a handful of individuals. There may be a specific leader, such as a President or a Prime Minister. There may also be elected officials, such as a senator or a representative. At the end of the day, however, the average person has very little influence on what happens to their society. They can write or talk to politicians. Still, at the end of the day, it is the politician making the decision and not the individual. 2. Everything is centralized in a unitary government, without exception. It can be advantageous to have certain governing elements be centralized, but a unitary government centralizes everything. That includes banking and financial markets. Unless someone has wealth, access or has talents or skills that can earn them that access, the unitary government is able to maintain power and control by limiting who can access wealth in that society. They can tax people, refuse to tax certain businesses, or place specific requirements on certain careers that can make it difficult for the average person to build wealth over time. 3. It is a government system that gives a lot of power to a few people or one individual. A centralized government has an enormous amount of power. Societal decisions are made on a daily basis. When that power is consolidated into a single individual, it becomes possible to manipulate this system of government for personal gain. That is why the unitary government structure is the most common form of government to transition into a dictatorship. There is so much time and money invested into the structure of the government that allowing one person to dictate what happens is seen as more valuable than having freedom of choice. 4. Unitary governments can create pockets of isolation. Because the power is centrally assigned, there must be access to a government satellite for every community at some level. Without access, there is no actual government. That can be advantageous if the government is abusive, though it is a definite negative for a community that is lacking resources and has no government access simultaneously. In many instances, governing under a unitary format becomes an exercise in survival instead of it being an exercise in forward progress. 5. It can also be ignorant about local concerns or problems. The unitary government structure takes a macro-view of society. Governing, however, needs to happen on macro- and micro-levels. Unless the government is active through a satellite in local communities, it will have little awareness of what the population of that community requires. Or worse - local concerns are set aside because the government feels that other threats are of a higher priority. Even if self-governing is encouraged, local communities struggle to access the resources they need when a centralized government is operational. Central government has no knowledge of the problems and needs of the far rural areas. Remote rural areas can be dealt effectively by the federal or decentralized system. Centralization of authority is itself a problem and unitary system often causes totalitarianism. It is the government of the urban people where state administration is practically in the control of the urban citizens. Government services and influence is always confined to cities. This government has less influence and control in rural areas and such areas are deprived of the state fruits. Unitary form of government empowers urban bureaucracy and ignores the rural needs. This system is useful only in small states e.g. Britain and Iran etc. In large states, unitary form of government is less democratic for it is dominated and controlled by the urban citizens and rural people have less share it. In unitary system, central government has a centralized command and there are no sub-ordinate governments to have check on the center, therefore central government becomes despotic and unchecked. Federation provides opportunities to both the governments to have check upon each other. Because of short of check, central government is to exercise all state powers and maximum of such powers is often used in extra-constitutional mode. So despotism is the disadvantage of unitary form of government.
Ato Berhanu Nega, you have no clue what democracy, political party or law and order are. Therefore, you shouldn’t be standing there and argue about anything related to politics. Your party has no mission or agenda. You have no credibility and integrity. Why don’t you leave politics for politicians and stick to what you know, economics? Or starting a new Political Party is your hobby? Do Ethiopia a big favor and stay away from politics. You, Endargchow Tisge and Nam Zelke are poisonous for Ethiopia!
Пікірлер: 330