So coherent....calm and let the music flows in a perfect timing and pace. The best B&W I have ever heard. Congratulations.
@philipw7058
2 жыл бұрын
How you can make those determination through your device is amazing 🥴
@paulc7190
2 жыл бұрын
@@philipw7058 even I was there , I don't know how these terms are used .. Timing pace calm ?
@budgetaudiophilelife-long5461
2 жыл бұрын
🤗🤩🤩BEAUTIFUL SOUNDS 🎶AND LOOKS THANKS FOR SHARING 😍😍😍
@Soundapple
7 ай бұрын
Wow
@martinvegas1327
2 жыл бұрын
Sound nice!
@blackmamba362
2 жыл бұрын
🥰 ein Traum😍
@Lobo243
2 жыл бұрын
Hi...what is the name of the artist? Beautiful speakers...I have the baby's the B&W PM1
@gerrithendriks1394
2 жыл бұрын
Prachtig!
@iampuzzleman282
Жыл бұрын
So r these things as good as the D3 series? I've never Heard a good description of how they sound
@wenderadventure
Жыл бұрын
what amplifiers were used?
@linandy1
2 жыл бұрын
Seems ok
@klepp19
2 жыл бұрын
What were the mono blocks driving this speaker?
@huangkenneth126
2 жыл бұрын
LOOKS LIKE NAD M33
@keepitreal5148
Жыл бұрын
No bi-wiring?
@00bikeboy
2 жыл бұрын
Many high end speaker manufacturers (e.g., Vandersteen, Wilson) set back the mid-range and tweeter to adjust for so-called time delay. Why doesn't B&W bother with this?
@willardedel
2 жыл бұрын
I don’t know, but it sounds the sound came from 1 unit with out phase phase/time problems
@klaushaunstrupchristensen7252
2 жыл бұрын
In an earlier version they did just that but they changed to this tweeter forward design. If memory serves me well the explanation given was something along these lines. The earlier version did use an acoustical 24 dB per octave filter which require that the drivers are connected with the same polarity, if the drivers are at the same distance from the listener. Then B&W decided to go for minimum component 6dB per octave crossover. Because the drivers have their own roll off they ended with a 12 dB or 18 dB acoustic crossover slope. A crossover with these slopes require the drivers to be connected with opposite fase
@klaushaunstrupchristensen7252
2 жыл бұрын
Sorry I pressed “post” by mistake so I will go on. However the development team came to the conclusion that instead of putting the tweeter in opposite phase compared to the midrange they could run both with the same polarity and the push the tweeter forward by half the wavelength at the crossover frequency, which gives the same effect (putting it 180 degrees out of phase) but holds the advantage that the tweeter is freed from diffraction and the acoustic shadow of the midrange cabinet/housing. Greetings from Denmark.
@klaushaunstrupchristensen7252
2 жыл бұрын
Beware my reply below or above comes in two chapters because I mistakenly pressed post by mistake
@00bikeboy
2 жыл бұрын
@@klaushaunstrupchristensen7252 Thank you for the in-depth response. Much appreciated.
@bryantperkins2632
2 жыл бұрын
Would not change a thing
@budgetaudiophilelife-long5461
2 жыл бұрын
🤔have you ever tried bi-wiring your Speakers 👍🤗
@willardedel
2 жыл бұрын
Not yet, maby try this later
@philipw7058
2 жыл бұрын
You do not need refraction behind the speaker,the only time you can is if you have rear firing drivers and in this case you don’t,put them out in the room if you want them to do what the are designed for,read about acoustical treatments and learn 🥴
Пікірлер: 27