Who makes the movie inserts because they are seriously so good!!
@cinnamondan4984
4 жыл бұрын
Right! Someone has an exhaustive knowledge of movies 🎥
@PADARM
4 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure it is Justin. He is so talented
@daniella.mariiaa
4 жыл бұрын
i don’t think who’s going to see this but i need help. ever since i was born i would go to church with my three brothers and my mom. my mom has been a mormon all her life so we naturally were “born” into it. when my parents started to fall out my mom stopped going to church and my dad never believed in us going to church so my mom stopped going we all stopped. and i started to go against rules i started drinking and making bad decisions as well with my brothers. i want to start making right choices and “rejoin” but i don’t know where to start. when i went to church i never really understands anything but i always went with it and i want to really get into it but i don’t know how. please help me and tell me what i need to do to start and where do i start
@grantarnold
4 жыл бұрын
Just go to this link: www.comeuntochrist.org Then click the phone icon in the top right corner and you’ll see options to get in contact with representatives. Best of luck.
@jakebryner4296
4 жыл бұрын
Rejoining/reactivating can be a tough process but it is possible and well worth it. I think I can help with this subject. If you have Instagram send me a DM @jakebryner , I've been through it but I don't want to post any personal details in these comments. Hope I can help👍
@SaintsUnscripted
4 жыл бұрын
Hey Daniella! We are always available if you want to send us a DM on Facebook or Instagram :)
@rodclarke8957
6 ай бұрын
How are you doing now Daniella?
@simon_carrick8198
2 жыл бұрын
The chadwick boseman picture right as he says “dead” hits different now
@nathanjackson4189
4 жыл бұрын
I like a lot of what your church teaches and nearly joined but i just can't seem to commit for some reason.
@SaintsUnscripted
4 жыл бұрын
Nathan Jackson Hey, if you have any questions, message us on Instagram, we'd love to chat :)
@BrendonKing
4 жыл бұрын
Is it the many Gods and baptizing for the dead? It might be the many Gods and baptizing for the dead.
@zrosix2240
4 жыл бұрын
Brendon King just one god. By definition a god is a superior being warshipped unto the people. All other beings that we believe created their own peoples as their god has no relevance to us. Why worship beings that did nothing for us? We do not glorify god for his power. We glorify him for his love, and because we love him. And the closer we come to perfection the more we love him, not the less. God is not going to be seen as our equal, because a part of our perfection is “love thy father.” And in order to become perfect you must love thy father. Love god.
@rowellballicud8358
Жыл бұрын
Do not be deceived Nathan it’s a cult ,read your Bible for yourself JESUS is the way the truth and the life believe in JESUS CHRIST alone
@alexlintu26
Жыл бұрын
It's a cult stay away 🤢
@juner0s3s22
4 жыл бұрын
Great job on this one! Love the part with Dr. Facillier. 😆
@Glen.Danielsen
3 жыл бұрын
Dave Snell is brother of scintillating Word! Incisive and full of bright light, gospel good sense! These videos are priceless for _TEACHING,_ and that is where they should be invited, used, cherished. 💛🙏🏼
@seans5289
4 жыл бұрын
Is there any benefit to accepting the gospel in your mortal life, as opposed to being saved in the spirit world?
@cinnamondan4984
4 жыл бұрын
A pat on the back by the Almighty himself.
@shelbylitten565
4 жыл бұрын
The difference is when you are aware of the gospel and when you know that it is true. If you are aware of the gospel in your mortal life yet you consciously choose to reject it then it is much harder to repent after you have died because you have to overcome the sin of rejecting the gospel when you knew it was true.
@seans5289
4 жыл бұрын
玛轼亚瑟: I’m guessing this is a joke, but assuming it were true, why would god favor someone he blessed with living in the time and place where they could hear the gospel over someone forced to live in 10,000 BCE or 700 CE?
@seans5289
4 жыл бұрын
Shelby Litten: So, are you you saying becoming aware of the gospel in mortality would be less desirable, because there’s the risk of backsliding after accepting it?
@Hamann9631
4 жыл бұрын
Sean S. Great question. The scriptures which are most helpful for this question are Hebrews 10:26, Hebrew 9:27, Alma 34:32-34, and Mosiah 3:12. Those scriptures teach about us having one chance and having this life to decide to follow God. Those scriptures don't contradict temple work for the dead because those scriptures are for people who have an opportunity in this life. Temple work for the dead is a back up plan for those who don't have the opportunity in this life. God will be your judge, so I shouldn't make a proclamation about whether a specific person has had their opportunity. God will decide whether to accept the work done for people who rejected the Gospel of Jesus Christ in this life (and if they rejected Him).
@grantarnold
4 жыл бұрын
David, FYI - I believe the church may have recently changed the “with permission” from family rule. I think now you have to be related by some degree to perform the ordinance. I received permission from the parents of my friend that passed, but I was not allowed.
@gunns7720
2 ай бұрын
You are reading Corinthians out of context
@bradleyhowell4155
Ай бұрын
How so? He is saying why di baptisms for the dead if they wont resurrect. Alluding to the new life symbolism of baptism. Doesnt sound like rejection or acceptance to me, rather hes just pointing out that they do this practice
@Dreammaster695
3 жыл бұрын
Abraham Isaac and Jacob have been exalted though along with their wives.. not everyone who has died is still in the spirit world
@Dreammaster695
4 жыл бұрын
I disagree that there isn’t anyone in heaven at the moment, there is but also a spirit world where you go first
@elizabeththomsett3389
3 жыл бұрын
Have you been into heaven to have a look. God tells us it is at hand. Escapetology is a lie.
@Dreammaster695
3 жыл бұрын
@@elizabeththomsett3389 so where is god and Jesus now
@elizabeththomsett3389
3 жыл бұрын
In the realm of heaven The Kingdom with the cloud of witnesses. If you have a different belief that's ok because we will all come to know the truth. In the meantime we can ask Jesus ourselves no need for a mediator.
@bradleyhowell4155
Ай бұрын
@@elizabeththomsett3389but jesus is the mediator
@cinnamondan4984
4 жыл бұрын
Baptising the dead like a boss!
@cloroxbleach2394
4 жыл бұрын
Why no holocaust victims though
@joshcooper7
4 жыл бұрын
What do you mean?
@jasonroberts9788
4 жыл бұрын
Because the Jews are kind of on a side quest with God and well.... ya. We just kinda let God deal with His chosen people how He sees fit. ;)
@marchall1468
7 ай бұрын
When did the celebrity thing change? Because I have seen looking up names that their temple work has been done. Elvis Presley is one name who's ordinances I have seen done.
@Beenhamite
4 жыл бұрын
Couple of questions, there are not records of all people so how can pre record peoples be baptised? Also, surely accepting the gospel / being baptised in the spirit world doesnt require faith as by that time you know there is an afterlife and will just accept it. So what is the point of baptism / accepting the gospel in the mortal world? Thanks
@juliesteimle3867
4 жыл бұрын
The might have an understanding there is an afterlife, but they might not have a testimony of Christ or know he is there. This is important. It is about accepting Christ.
@seans5289
4 жыл бұрын
Julie Steimle: Wouldn’t someone with sure knowledge of an afterlife have an advantage over someone yet to experience their death and subsequent existence?
@Chillymosquito
4 жыл бұрын
1)We are told that in the millennium that will be taken care of. 2) the desires of your heart and who you are does not change in the spirit world. As in the scriptures men have seen and have felt the Holy Ghost yet still chose to deny it.
@brettmajeske3525
4 жыл бұрын
@@seans5289 Lots of non-christian beliefs have some sort of after life. T don't know how much of an advantage it would be.
@alexlintu26
Жыл бұрын
@@Chillymosquito yes you will face judgement and eternal condemnation in pits of hell
@jasonroberts9788
4 жыл бұрын
So who's watching this AFTER Black Panther went to the spirit world? That was akwardly prophetic....
@evanleebuxton1054
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah....
@brianchristyniblett4777
3 жыл бұрын
Great job keep it going!
@austineastman777
Жыл бұрын
Can anyone explain the question mark after the verse from paul???
@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr
Жыл бұрын
I had to pause and do some googling at the Jerome reference. Jerome from the 300s thought this was happening? I thought. No, why is it named that, it seems to be just a book written by some people in the 1960s. Ok so there's one protestant who says hey maybe it means that in 1989 and this commentary written in 1968 and this is supposed to be proof that this was happening? This is modern day commentary on that one verse. It's just not substantiated that this is what he meant. I interpret the verse to mean, if you're going to die anyway and not rise, why get baptized? Not that they are doing your practice of baptizing for the dead!
@ethancate8462
Жыл бұрын
You misunderstand. It's not supposed to be proof. It's offering an outsider of the church's perspective so to not be too bias. It's to show it doesn't have no credibility, not prove anything.
@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr
Жыл бұрын
@@ethancate8462 Um ok so there's a microscopic chance that you are right. Maybe the holocaust never happened too, you can find people who say that too. There are enough idiots in the world you can find someone saying just about anything.
@ethancate8462
Жыл бұрын
@@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr a microscopic chance about it not being proof, or about teaching in spirit paradise/baptism for the dead? I don't rely on my interpretation of the Bible to know about these things, but about my knowledge of the truth of the church. I've seen God's hand in everything here. I feel the spirit most when I serve others, especially when I baptize for the dead. I simply cannot rely on what people say negatively about the church because they do not align with what I already know is true. That's why I do it. But don't take my word for it. Find out for yourself.
@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr
Жыл бұрын
@@ethancate8462 A microscopic chance that the verse is actually referring to a Mormon style practice.
@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr
Жыл бұрын
@@ethancate8462 you can find that same feeling other places. It is unreliable.
@tpbarron
4 жыл бұрын
That answers so many questions.
@Doc-Pleroma-naut
4 жыл бұрын
Or......one possible interpretation is that the verse refers to Christ’s announcement to departed spirits of the triumph of his resurrection, declaring to them the victory he had achieved by his death and resurrection, as pointed out in the previous verse. According to this view, the Greek word for “preached” means “proclaimed.” Even those who rejected God in their earthly lives will acknowledge the lordship of Christ, for Philippians 2:10-11 says every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. However, not all who bow their knees will be able to call Him Savior. The people described in 1 Peter 3:19 are awaiting the final judgment in the same place as the rich man in Luke 16:19-31; they are not being invited to accept a postmortem salvation. Additionally, Many non-LDS scholars believe that in 1 Corinthians Paul was denouncing or condemning the practice of baptism for the dead as heretical. This is a strange conclusion, since Paul uses the practice to support the doctrine of the resurrection. In essence, he says, “Why are we performing baptism in behalf of our dead, if, as some propose, there will be no resurrection of the dead? If there is to be no resurrection, would not such baptisms be a waste of time?” But, When verse 29 is dissected, though, it can be seen that Paul purposely did not use the first person "we" in this verse. The most plausible interpretation is that some in Corinth were getting baptized vicariously for the dead. Several factors put this into perspective. Although Paul does not explicitly condemn the practice, neither does he endorse it. So Imagine a Protestant writing, “Why do they then pray for the dead, if the dead do not rise at all?” No one would take this as an endorsement of the practice of praying for the dead; it is a criticism of the inconsistency of praying for the dead while holding that the dead do not rise. To make this rhetorical question an endorsement of the practice of praying for the dead, one would expect, “Why do we then pray for the dead?” Likewise, in 1 Corinthians 15:29 Paul preserves the more distant "they". After all, his primary concern in 1 Corinthians 15 is the defense of the Christian doctrine of resurrection. His rhetorical question in verse 29 may simply be pointing out the inconsistency of those who deny the final resurrection, granted their rather strange baptismal practices. There is no good evidence for vicarious baptism anywhere in the New Testament. By the same token, there is no hint that this vicarious baptism (if that is what it was) was intended by the Corinthian believers to cover as many deceased people as could be named. If the practice existed at all, it may have been tied to a few people or special cases-for example, when a relative died after trusting the gospel but before being baptized. We really do not know. If it were something like that, one could understand why Paul does not make a federal case of it. In any case, Paul’s clear emphasis is that people are justified by grace through faith, which demands a personal response. Christian baptism is part of that personal response, even as it is a covenantal pledge. In contrast, baptism on behalf of someone who has not exercised such faith sounds like magic-of something far from Pauline thought.
@monocuco818
3 жыл бұрын
If you read chapters 3 and 4 in 1 Peter, it is made very clear that Christ preached the gospel to the dead... even that they may be judged according to the flesh. Read both chapters, it is clear that they can receive the gospel and is an essential part of Christ's Atonement.
@Doc-Pleroma-naut
3 жыл бұрын
@@monocuco818 Hey if you want to baptize Adolf Hitler and Anne Frank simultaneously and all in the same breath - have at it. Pretty disgusting theology providing these despots a chance at heavenly glory because, "in reality, there is no hell for any of them since they cannot be “sons of perdition” and thus cast into outer darkness." And you are completely misreading Peter. Peter said in the context that those who were living evil lives and causing problems for these first century Christians were going to be judged. He then moved back into the past tense, explaining that those who were already dead had the truth preached to them when they were alive. While Peter explained in the previous chapter (3:19) how Jesus “made a proclamation to the spirits in prison,” there is no indication that this meant these spirits could accept the gospel. To say that salvation can take place after death goes against the Bible’s teaching, as Heb 9:27 and 2 Cor 6:2 state that there are no second chances. As a matter of fact, Alma 34:31 in the BoM states that there no works are acceptable after this life.
@monocuco818
3 жыл бұрын
@@Doc-Pleroma-naut You need to reread those verses in 1 Peter. You still don't get them. They speak of those that have died, even as far back as those who died in the flood, being taught the gospel of Jesus Christ. Verse 6 in 1 Peter 4 "For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit." Judged according to those who live, yet live according to God in the Spirit. Or in other words, judged as if they were alive and brought to Christ to live according to His Spirit. At what point does this say that they would be damned? Christ would not do something like that. vs 5 in 1 Peter 4 "Who shall give account to him that is ready to judge the quick and the dead." Here he says Christ is ready to judge the living and the dead not that they have already been judged, and then verse 6 clarifies why. The gospel is preached to them, so that Christ may judge them. Without a knowledge of the Savior and His gospel, they cannot be judged. It would not be just. Christ also went to "paradise" when He died right? But as soon as He resurrected He told Mary not to touch Him. Why? Well because He had not yet ascended to His Father. So paradise is not Heaven, where the Father is, but another place. Then in 1 Peter we learn that this is where Christ taught the gospel to the dead Spirits. That thief that died with Him on the cross, believed in Christ and went with Him to paradise where He could now hear the full gospel and be judged accordingly, accepting or rejecting His Savior and His gospel. Your scripture in Hebrews is also interpreted incorrectly. "But after this, the judgement." Does not mean when someone dies, but after this life. Life does not end after death, we continue as spirits until the final judgement, which is part of this life. Have you not read Revelation? The judgement has not occurred yet, but will after the final battle with Satan and the time of peace and the resurrection. Corinthians also does not give a definitive timeline as to when we will be judged, just that now is the time to come to the Savior. Now is always the time to come to the Savior, just as it was over 2000 years ago when He said that. And those that have died since this time still live according to the spirit and have time to accept Christ. I also, would rather do baptism for the dead for someone like Hitler and let God judge Him, than believe that Christ would abandon all of those who never had the chance to know His name and condemn them to Hell. Those who believe that Christ would do such a thing has the same mindset as Hitler, that one soul is more important than another to God. Those who believe that do not know the mercy of God or the Justice of His Son. They do not know the Savior.
@Doc-Pleroma-naut
3 жыл бұрын
@@monocuco818 I am pretty sure I understand them as I have a double MA in Theology and Philosophy. Not to use an argument from authority, but to liken a ritual such as “baptism for the dead” to what Jesus did and saying humans “hold the keys” of other people’s salvation is nothing less than blasphemous. I get it though....this teaching allowed followers to have a peace of mind about their ancestors who lived between the ages of the “Great Apostasy” and the early 19th C. However, it was never intended this to allow everyone after 1830 who had already heard the Mormon gospel to have a second chance at the celestial kingdom. Problem is, even past Presidents noted that baptism for the dead for salvation wasn't cogent (this would be true for McConkie and Kimball). Unfortunately, many live with the misconception that they can perform proxy baptisms on behalf of their deceased relatives who rejected Mormonism in order to ensure being together as a family in eternity. This is not supported by LDS teaching. The family unit is preserved only in the top level of the celestial kingdom and only if every family member has kept all the commandments. McConkie stated that those who reject the Mormon gospel in this life and reverse their course and accept it in the spirit world will go no further than the second level of Mormon heaven - the terrestrial kingdom
@Doc-Pleroma-naut
3 жыл бұрын
@@monocuco818 Let's have a closer look at the two chapters you pointed out in Peter. 1 Peter 3:18-20 says,“For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: by which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.” Baptism “saves” only in that it is “an appeal to God,” an act of faith acknowledging dependence on Him. Verse 21 says that it comes not by washing of water but by an appeal to God. There is a four-step process of how both the ark and the ordinance of baptism symbolize the Christian’s salvation in Christ: 1. The ark’s occupants were inside before the waters came; the believer is likewise “in Christ” before water baptism. 2. The ark containing the occupants was surrounded by the waters of the flood, with water beneath and rain above; likewise, those in Christ go into the water. 3. Those in the ark had a resurrection from the waters; similarly, the believer is resurrected out of the water. 4. Those in the ark left behind their former world and started afresh; so also the believer, having risen from the waters of baptism, now goes forth to walk in newness of life. It needs to be remembered that baptism, like partaking of the Lord’s Supper, is a work. It is something that an individual must personally perform. As such, it is not a requirement for receiving salvation under the guidelines of Ephesians 2:8-9. “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast.”
Пікірлер: 119