This is crazy, as someone who studied in Kharkiv seeing these same buildings again but this way is beyond description
@RenéSaussy
4 ай бұрын
I lived in Kyiv for a bit and I feel the same. It’s insane that people still try to justify this war.
@m1l3s27
4 ай бұрын
@@tomk3732Troll gonna troll, enjoy your petty spending money denominated in ever less valuable Rubles.
@tomk3732
4 ай бұрын
@@m1l3s27 LOL, I don't even speak Russian. What truth hurts, huh?
@TheTiger8753
4 ай бұрын
@@tomk3732 It's like the Russian posters in Kherson "Russia is here forever" Where are the Russians there now? A Russian forever is counted in months isn't it Ivan ??
@thedealermusic
4 ай бұрын
@@tomk3732that sentence doesn’t make sense. Again, if you’re going to troll, use proper English
@kopyloffandrew
4 ай бұрын
Correction: the Northern border never has been silent since 2022. It is a frontline indeed
@dirkoftheblaze2352
4 ай бұрын
I think he meant in terms of infantry operations. Ukraine’s border has been shelled basically every day since the invasion began.
@kopyloffandrew
4 ай бұрын
@@dirkoftheblaze2352 yes and no. Large-scale offensive didn't happen, however small groups try to break in almost on a daily basis. As for the shelling part - that is correct
@VodkaPandas
4 ай бұрын
Yeah they not, Ukraine shelled Belgorod, cross the border during election in Russia, Russia is done playing Ukraine little propaganda.
@cameronspence4977
4 ай бұрын
I believe this whole Kharkhiv operation is both the fixing in place option, and the stretching ukraine's troops thin option. Whether it will actually work remains to be seen though.
@timothyrussell4445
4 ай бұрын
Seems to be working pretty well so far
@GIGACHAD-cy5jq
4 ай бұрын
I feel like its impossible to estimate how well it working since those reserves could have helped gaining chasiv yar for example
@User-jr7vf
4 ай бұрын
None of that. PU TIN said in a press interview in China that the Kharkhiv operations are meant to create a buffer zone to protect Russia from Ukrainian attacks, he made it clear that the objective is not to take Kharkhiv.
@cameronspence4977
4 ай бұрын
@@timothyrussell4445 How could you possibly know if it's working well or not you don't even know what the aim of the operation is in the first place, and it hasn't even been a week since the operation started? Are you telepathic?
@lagrangewei
4 ай бұрын
it will work, the question is how long Ukraine has... if Ukraine can drag it for years, it not bad news, if they could last only months, then they need to consider surrender.
@jayhill2193
4 ай бұрын
Regarding the grey tone / buffer zone, one thing you didn't mention as to why Ukraine needed to dig in much farther from the country border is that Ukraine is not allowed to attack on Russian soil with Western weapons. So aside from homemade drones and old-fashioned artillery, Ukraine's hands were tied whereas Russia could accumulate more and more ressources on their side of the border.
@pax6833
4 ай бұрын
The silver lining here is that DC has now said the restriction on attacking Russia is over. So now Ukraine is weapons free on Belgorod oblast. Given that the 'offensive' has already ground to a halt, I think it might be safe to say this was a miscalculation on Putin's part. He didn't gain much, but instead triggered more escalation from NATO.
@gae_wead_dad_6914
4 ай бұрын
@@pax6833 Eh, it's more of a "morale" victory Like, have you seen history legends video? That one dumb youtuber who stated "The entire Ukrainian defense collapsed"? That's what they were going for. True stupitdity at it's finest
@John_shepard
4 ай бұрын
@@pax6833I feel like the secretary gave the illusion of choice. I didn’t see it as official.
@jeffersonclippership2588
4 ай бұрын
It's been frustrating reading media coverage that completely ignores this and makes it seem like the Ukrainians were just negligent. We're lucky to have the ISW and people like William who actually know what they're talking about.
@u2beuser714
4 ай бұрын
@@pax6833 What escalation from nato? So long as nato doesnt send troops into nato i could hardly see any escalation
@mjl1966y
4 ай бұрын
I like how everybody around Zelynski is wearing body armor while he walks around in a T-shirt.
@harderway8568
4 ай бұрын
That pore guy is so broke, he's been wearing that same T-shirt for two years now.
@SteveJones-gz4vd
4 ай бұрын
@@harderway8568 High Maint Wife fella
@davidkottman3440
4 ай бұрын
@@harderway8568 LOL, can't even keep up with the claims; broke beggar with 1 T-shirt, or corrupt grifter with many yachts & penthouses!?!
@ghoraxe9000
4 ай бұрын
He's got a mithril vest... The same one frodo wore in lord of the rings
@geofflepper3207
4 ай бұрын
@@harderway8568 No, no, no you silly Russian troll. Didn't you get the memo from upstairs? Russian trolls are supposed to spout out propaganda lying and claiming that the Ukrainian leader is filthy rich from corrupt activities. And here you are saying that he is dirt poor. You're going to be in a heck of a lot of trouble with your boss if he sees what you posted. Maybe if you are lucky you won't be sent to the front for your massive screw-up.
@Fenrisson
4 ай бұрын
8:02 - A "Chasiv what?" Pirate "Yarrr"
@mm650
4 ай бұрын
Russia's tactics,for organization reasons, have been a general set of low-level pushes across the entire front. Opening up more fron means more total Ukranian territory falling simly because those pushes can happen over a longer line. That said, I mostly think this is a fixing operation, although your point about the range of tube artillery is well taken.
@cameronspence4977
4 ай бұрын
I think it is both
@GojiMet86
4 ай бұрын
Lines-On-Map Man bringing the lines on the map again! Doesn't seem like a coincidence that as soon as the American aid package came through, Russia started moving to squeeze out as much as it can before Ukraine can get the tide turns against it favor.
@dojelnotmyrealname4018
4 ай бұрын
That seems so short sighted though. Seems like you'd want to move before that happens so you can bunker down.
@slepp449
4 ай бұрын
Perhaps they thought that rushing forward and giving headline worthy advances would have increased the chances of the bill passing
@tanmaypandey4028
4 ай бұрын
Half of the fuckin aid is going in the pockets of officers and all! After all Ukraine is the most corrupt country in all of Europe (maybe after belarus) also, the tide won't turn now, the problem is not ammo or weapons, but manpower.
@TheDogGeneral
4 ай бұрын
Turn the war in their favor ? I don't see that as a contingency if Ukraine were able to do it it would have already done it and all their success is based on heavy subsidies of foreign aid as it is, Europe needs to wake up and realize that Ukraine is their problem. It either increases war preparation spending or gets ready for Russia control the way I see it Europe is asleep at the wheel and has been and has no intention of changing that even with the recent increases in expenditure they are counting on American Management in something in their backyard
@clause6930
4 ай бұрын
@@AaSs-ln9mmKharkiv operation and Kherson is “doing shit”?) inflicting up to 530k casualties is “doing shit”?) winning Black Sea battle without an actual navy is “doing shit”? Taking down Kindzhals is “doing shit”?) Shooting down 2 A-50s and Il-23 is “doing shit”?) Destroying 6 TU-23 bombers is “doing shit”?) Taking down nuclear weapon radar is “doing shit”?) Destroying hundreds of aircraft is “doing shit”?) Taking down all tank fleet ruzzians had before 24.02.22 is “doing shit”?) Educate yourself please.
@MostlyPennyCat
4 ай бұрын
3:22 60 billion plus that other 300 billion they're going to get.
@MostlyPennyCat
4 ай бұрын
@@apurvd6177 The seized Russian funds that they're in the process of giving to Ukraine.
@MostlyPennyCat
4 ай бұрын
@@apurvd6177 Plus the 10s or 100s of billions that Europe et al. give to Ukraine every year.
@begonekneecaps9718
4 ай бұрын
half that to account for corruption.
@FullOilBarrel
4 ай бұрын
@@apurvd6177 frozen russian assets tat was given to ukraine recently
@zippyparakeet1074
4 ай бұрын
@@begonekneecaps9718 Ah yes, weak, corrupt Ukraine that has managed to "somehow" hold out against chad, efficient, corrupt less mother Russia for 2+ years now. 🤡 Good job comrade, your weekly ration of a loaf of bread has been approved for your service to the motherland on the "online, keyboward-warrior" front. Keep it up!
@criminoboy
4 ай бұрын
I think it's a big jump to credit the recent US Aid package as a having a huge effect on Russian action. Russia has been building up their forces all year, and many analysts were expecting a large Russian offensive this summer.
@andyreznick
4 ай бұрын
Agreed. Everyone is trying to read the tea leaves, myself included. Personally, I think Putin is trying for the best look he can get by November, and to convince Trump of a fait accompli. But, it's anyone's guess as to the point of this now, including, I suspect, a lot of the Russian General Staff. Putin is an intelligence technocrat by trade and a criminal boss by choice. He sees Ukraine's allies as insufficiently united and committed (the technocrat) and is trying to capitalize (the crime boss). The whole thing looks rushed - like a dictator screaming at his generals for results. We will see.
@XxMusclecarsxX
4 ай бұрын
he says Russia is on a time crunch and I don't buy it. Putin is more than willing to have this war last a decade if he has to. Foreign will run out while russia makes its own weapons
@Bad_Temper
4 ай бұрын
This dude is NATO glazer bro, I watch his channel to understand how effeminate men think
@bbethan70
4 ай бұрын
I'm sure it definitely does. Russia prefers to attack while Ukraine is weakened
@mortvald
4 ай бұрын
goes to show these arm chair experts, russia's big arrow attack will never come. they have been crippled in ww2 population wise and will not risk too much casualties.
@nekoill
4 ай бұрын
Aren't you that guy who was gloating about Ukrainian INGENEOUS tactic to "give Russia dilemmas" like half a year ago or so? If that's the case, you are among thre last people one should listen to with regards to "Russia's long-term strategy" and whatnot, my guy 😸
@leight420
4 ай бұрын
this video should be named battle of cope: missinformed westerners still in denial
@robertmoore3982
4 ай бұрын
Yes, and it’s depressing. People are too controlled here
@skuadak2
3 ай бұрын
@@robertmoore3982 Oh yea, "Robert", "we" are too controlled "here" 😂
@AstroJunnk
4 ай бұрын
HAHHAHAHA Dude is talking shitt. 61 billion wont arrive or change anything on ground.
@redko79
4 ай бұрын
Lies. Capturing Kiev has NEVER been the objective. Seriously anyone having WW2 in mind and checking HOW MUCH troops russians deployed around Kiev should know that this WASN'T done to take the city. Even ex-Zelensky's adviser Oleksii Arestovych admitted that in a video. The move was done only to stress Kiev and force Zelensky to negociate. Which actually WORKED. Negociations were supposed to be done in Turkey. But Boris Johnson came in and convinced Zelensky to keep the fight because Ukraine would recieve for this billions and billions in aids. Well, he lied. We don't have industries to feed Ukraine with weapons for a war of such scale! DONE!
@Nathan-Roman
4 ай бұрын
Here before the bots for once
@u2beuser714
4 ай бұрын
Same, these ukrainian bots are too loud
@orktv4673
4 ай бұрын
First kremlinbot has arrived I see
@nicklindberg90
4 ай бұрын
@@u2beuser714🇷🇺🤖🤢
@pmakins95
4 ай бұрын
@@orktv4673 Shovels too strong, so you call people kremlin bots xD
@benparrish9547
4 ай бұрын
Lmao xD
@elkarim9929
4 ай бұрын
Stop the nonsense of 61 billion !!!! Only 27billion to Ukraine !! The rest stay in the states
@KarelLernout
4 ай бұрын
This analysis is BELOW moderate, sorry to say. Some facts you "forget": 1. The Russians wanted to negotiate a peace-agreement that would be respected (not like Minsk II where both Merkel and Hollande both admitted they never intended to apply it and it was just needed to prepare Ukraine for war). The Russians withdrew from Kiev because this was one of the actions agreed upon the peace deal in march 2022, that was until Boris Johnsson flew to Kiev to blow up the agreement... 2. You show Zelensky in Kiev on Feb 23, 2022 but somehow everyone doesn't want to mention that Zelensky blew up the Budapest Memorandum on Feb 19, 2022 (by begging for US nukes on the Munich Security Conference). After Ukraine killed ethnic russians in Donbass since 2014, this was the final barrier being taken away to end the killing of CIVILIANS in Ukraine with heavy warfare for 8 years before 2022... 3. According to the UN charter articles 106 and 107, the Russians (as legal inheritants of the Sovjet Union) have the right to intervene in Ukraine (among other countries) if there is a threat by neo-nazis to ethnic russians. Whether there is such threat will be evaluated, but I strongly recommend watching the French documentary by top-reporter Paul Moreira for Special Investigation made in 2016 first... kzitem.info/news/bejne/oqxjr6CopaKra4I 4. Last but not least, maybe you should listen to "confessions" that the White House advisor made in 2015 on the Chicago Council on Global Affairs during the Q&A session... kzitem.info/news/bejne/spuC25Ovsqxkp5g
@sajuente8235
4 ай бұрын
nice russian troll :D
@mountainjew1474
4 ай бұрын
Bruh. Wall of text that nobody going to read. Russia is killing civilians in eastern Ukraine since 2014. COS THEY STARTED WAR!!!!!
@georgedoolittle9015
4 ай бұрын
According to Putin the purpose of this activity in the kHarkiv Oblast which is a massive expansion of the Putin Russia War effort btw and one that continues to fail to achieve its objectives in everyway....is to create and I quote "a buffer zone." Is this quote an accurate translation of what Putin said? If so does that match what is happening on the ground? If not why not?
@OutletVibes
4 ай бұрын
I'm not a general or military advisor but I've played enough strategy games to know pulling units from the Chasiv Yar direction is the worst thing Ukraine could do. They'd be better off pulling a platoon from each division along the donetsk river to consolidate them up north. You need to move FPV drones south to defend the river but they have significant manpower south they can tap into as Russia has mostly ignored the Kherson region for the last year. Without Russia sending a significant force south for an amphibious invasion, the risk is low. I also can't see Russia committing a significant force in the region as they've moved 50,000+ troops into the Kharkiv region. imo I see war like chess. They've made their move and it's time to capitalize on it. Whether that's total defense or launching an offensive of their own in the Kherson region. I definitely think it's time Ukraine expands it's enlistment if it isn't able to stabilize the front within the next month.
@KiraNt4
4 ай бұрын
In your games did you have to take in account terrible corruption, soldiers' war fatigue and 15% of the army as deserters? That's how it is in Ukraine now
@OutletVibes
4 ай бұрын
@@KiraNt4 you should try out heart of iron 4 it’s an amazingly detailed game.
@OutletVibes
4 ай бұрын
Steel division 2 and warno are also great games to look at.
@lagrangewei
4 ай бұрын
if ukraine unit are the same, what you said is logical, but they are not. the unit in the south do not have the same supporting elements in their command structure, they are not mobile and so cannot be more north without abandoning their equipment. support unit are expensive, not all military unit have the same mobility. they are really there as a buffer to delay any attack, but they are not equiped to face off with the enemy, if you take them away from a natural defensive river, their odds of survival would be bad.
@fandomguy8025
4 ай бұрын
@@KiraNt4 People often mention Ukraine's corruption but they never mention Russia's sort of cancels it out. Remember that these used to be part of the same country & Russia is well known for being a "Mafia state." with the whole falling out of a window epidemic. (Plus, other things like Russian generals selling propellers of ships for money) The major differences between the two is Russia is bigger & Ukraine's elections seem more legit.
@RichardTaylor1630
4 ай бұрын
A fine point on the size of US aid approved for Ukraine: it's not "61 billion." Most of the $61 billion is to buy new toys for the US military. I estimate that only about $20 billion worth of aid will actually make itself to Ukraine. Still a substantial amount, but nowhere near the amount that M. T. Greene chooses to descend into hysteria about as "shipping money to Ukraine."
@wimdejong5399
4 ай бұрын
Very enjoyable, thanks William!
@dt2985
4 ай бұрын
Of the 61 billion "Ukraine package" only a small fraction will go directly to Ukraine. There is no window of Opportunity.
@graemekeeley4497
4 ай бұрын
Correct Very little of the huge US Congress-approved funds for Ukraine get to the front line A large share of the money in the aid bills is spent in the United States, paying for American factories and workers to produce the various weapons that are either shipped to Ukraine or to replenish the U.S. weapons stocks the Pentagon has drawn on during the war. Much of the U.S. aid has gone toward providing weapons systems, training, and intelligence The magnitude of U.S. aid to Ukraine in the latter part of the conflict has done little to stop Russian military success in Ukraine's Eastern Regions
@GeldUndKokaine-kc1hp
4 ай бұрын
I like your channel, good job
@PlayerAfricanChieften
4 ай бұрын
what u talking about bro, russia lost the war! putin is ded from stage 8 cancer, ukrainian army captured moscow yesterday, i saw it on BBC
@JohnWellings-k8d
4 ай бұрын
If there was ever a time for the French and baltic states, to step in and help... It's now.... surely
@schildpatt14
4 ай бұрын
Relax people, Kharkiv has no strategic value anyway. (С)
@asan1050
4 ай бұрын
William Spaniel Thanks for posting this video
@BlayngTv
4 ай бұрын
I thought Russia was doing really really bad. How come they moving so fast? This is unbelievable damn you Russia LOL.
@natedowns
4 ай бұрын
Wasn't this the same channel that said Russians troops were out of ammo and were using shovels 😂
@mabeSc
4 ай бұрын
All of his videos are unwatchable after you've seen 3 of them. Just repeating repeating and repeating. And even with so much repeating you still don't even get half a clear idea of what is going on.
@Hoodlum555
4 ай бұрын
There is nothing better than some 'lines on maps' to go with my morning coffee :) I enjoy your videos, I feel edukated
@KarelLernout
4 ай бұрын
If you were educated, then you'd probably know it's written with a C!
@Hoodlum555
4 ай бұрын
@@KarelLernout if you had a sense of humour you may not have replied to this post.
@juliantheapostate8295
4 ай бұрын
@@KarelLernout 'eduCated'?
@andersgrassman6583
4 ай бұрын
👍😆 (I once received a graded philosophy exam at university, concerning argumentative analysis, a matter riddled with potential pitfalls, where the only comment was a spelling correction of the astronomer Johannes Kepler's name, which I had misspelled Keppler. That felt weird.)
@Hoodlum555
4 ай бұрын
@@juliantheapostate8295 your so smart!
@verazunrus4834
4 ай бұрын
Love me some armchair-soldier propaganda in the morning
@Bacontruffle
4 ай бұрын
This move by the Kremlin puzzles me. Like you said, the forces are nowhere near enough to occupy the city. But then again, neither were they during the "special military operation". Getting stuck in yet another slog (which is the most likely outcome, when you consider the tactical situation around Kharkiv, and how last time went) does nothing for the Kremlin. Because of this, the idea of this being a grey zone occupation exercise doesn't make much sense either. A fixing operation - while a possible explanation - comes with a massive problem: 50.000 troops are a *massive* investment for a move like this. And losses against an entrenched position - not to mention heavily urbanized area - will likely be high. Whatever gains the Kremlin hopes to gain at the cost of these losses, remains a mystery to me. The most likely (to me, at this time) explanation is that the Kremlin is frustrated at the state of the war. Fighting massive battles over tiny population centers like Avdiivka doesn't exactly help to win the war, and makes Russia look weak. (because it is.) I suspect this move is part political (technically taking a large chunk of territory - even if effectively dead man's land - makes Russia look stronger and perhaps the Kremlin hopes to have a demoralizing effect on the West - wrongfully so) part... "f*ck it, we can't win like this, might as well try a full-scale push across all fronts and see what happens" hail mary. It wouldn't be at all unlike the Kremlin to make massive bets that will either turn out amazingly or - most likely - disastrously.
@NikolayBychkovRus
4 ай бұрын
Man, this is still a reconnaissance in battle. I bet next week we will see new area will became hot.
@Bacontruffle
4 ай бұрын
@@NikolayBychkovRus could be, could not According to Ukrainian intel about 20.000/50.000 of the Russian forces have been committed already
@Bacontruffle
4 ай бұрын
@heitors.3917 Logistic motivations actually make a lot of sense. Ukraine has hit Rostov-on-don a lot the past 2 years but Belgorod and Kursk have comparitively remained pretty intact. Not to mention, the stress on the Southern and Eastern regions must be massive for the Russians.
@justliberty4072
4 ай бұрын
When you have advantages in materiel and personnel, it pays to spread out the opponent as much as possible. Opening a new front favors the larger force.
@avs38rus
4 ай бұрын
If you don't suspect anything, you'll look smarter.
@MemesOfProduction69
4 ай бұрын
I love a good lunchtime upload!! Appreciate yhe content, as always!
@sleepybokchoy
4 ай бұрын
Hi Will ! 👋 Thanks for the lines on maps!
@geraint8989
4 ай бұрын
Anders Puck Nielsen’s argument is more persuasive: there is no reason to assume that Russian military plans are good plans.
@MrSlientdeath
4 ай бұрын
I think russia wants to bring Karhkiv in the range of their tube artillery.
@UTIBE5
4 ай бұрын
3:13 bro speaking about 61 we've heard it time and again that it's less than 20bn that would actually land in Ukraine hands and less than 15 would be dedicated to military. 50% of that money is going back to USA
@AricBolf
4 ай бұрын
It seems to me, Kiev could ‘conscript’ 18-25 year olds into back line only positions serving like 5 days a month. 3 days are used filling in back line positions and 2 days of training. And instead of all of these conscripts serving at the same time, they are spread across 10 groups serving concurrently. That would free up fighters to go to the front like other countries are considering doing.
@jeffersonclippership2588
4 ай бұрын
Good rule of thumb is that if you or I, randos on the internet, have thought of this, it's a safe bet that the people who's job is to think of this kind of stuff already have.
@rjScubaSki
4 ай бұрын
Ukraine will have to throw everyone they have into action before any other countries get involved beyond small special forces deployments realistically
@Pwh5476
4 ай бұрын
That could work, but the resources and manpower required to do that would make it not worth it. Generally, if you're going to conscript you want people to stay in the armed forces for a while because it takes time to get them up to speed on how things work. Even if it's a simple job, someone will always find a way to screw it up
@stupidburp
4 ай бұрын
I would make it for 20-25 year olds. But also expand it to everyone regardless of gender or fitness. Give everyone a couple of years after high school to continue studying and gain some civilian job related skills. Subsidize the costs for that post secondary education, especially in fields most needed by the country. Two years means a focus primarily on technical and vocational training but even associates liberal arts programs would be an option. Then during the 20-25 year old period they could have a national service requirement for everyone lasting a year or two of active service and the rest as a reservist. This should include civil defense training, some basic military training, and training in a national service job, then several months to a year of service work. This might include further military training and service for those who meet the standards and military needs. But could also involve training in other national service jobs that support the urgent needs of the country such as in medical care, logistics, law enforcement, construction, or manufacturing related to government needs. This will create a large pool of trained workers and military recruits. This then can be drawn upon in the 25 year old and older group for active service on the front lines or in critical rear area shortages on a rotating basis with relatively short duration in harm’s way because of the large pool. It simultaneously would create a war economy focused civilian life with opportunities provided for internships and jobs that would support overall morale and productivity.
@carlosandleon
4 ай бұрын
@@jeffersonclippership2588you’ll be surprised how much major organizations miss things. That’s why intel made a portal where even janitors or customers can put forward their ideas and argue with top execs anonymously online.
@proatplanes
4 ай бұрын
Je ne sais pas pourquoi je parle français, je ne sais même pas parler français
@ogdocvato
4 ай бұрын
Vive la France! 🇺🇦🇫🇷
@KeepingitRiowithGringoSuave
4 ай бұрын
What is missing here is a discussion of how this so-called buffer zone in Ukraine will likely turn into a killing zone of Russian troops. These troops were able to assemble in the relative safety inside the Russian border. With a huge wave of ammo coming into Ukraine from the U.S., how in the world does it benefit the Russians to put their troops inside Ukraine where Ukrainians can rain steel on them without having to restrict their weapon usage? Also missing in this discussion is how the Russians have already suffered devastating losses of their professional soldiers over two years of war. Now, they are sending relatively untrained soldiers into a killing zone in Ukraine. I don't see the logic here.
@foseninfo8954
4 ай бұрын
Because u make assumptions and then fail to see the logic. Could it be ur assumptions are not correct?
@TylernsuchPvP
4 ай бұрын
I can already hear zelensky begging for more aid and it hasnt even been there for a week yet
@urdnal
4 ай бұрын
Will, Will, Will 😏 _Clearly_ this Kharkiv push is a rush to achieve some kind of victory prior to the *2025* Victory Day parade.
@Gametheory101
4 ай бұрын
Oh my bad
@giovanni-ed7zq
4 ай бұрын
@@Gametheory101 the reason why the russians were able to push in 3km or so is because ukraine isnt allowed to use american artillery and rockets on russian soil. so they have to wait till russian troops actually cross and occupy ukrainian land. in the grand scheme about 20k or so russian troops isnt enough to take karkiv or sumy. i believe its a fixing operation to deny reserves to chasiv yar or avdiivka direction. the issue also is ukraine didnt build defences all the way to the border because its in the artillery zone. you dont want to sit troop concentrations in the artillery zone. its the same reason why the russian legion was able to go across into russia because they dont defend in the artillery zone. i believe the russians intended to rush the kharkiv as well as chasiv yar and avdiivka fronts because they wanted to take as much land as possible before ukraine got substantially more artillery shells. that said with relaxing of rationing and arrival of some artillery shells, its likely too late. i dont think they anticipated the us pre-shipping critical supplies to poland before the president signed the bill. the rising casualty numbers for russia tells you they are pushing more and more men in. its up 50 percent from the normal 1k a day from ukrainian reports.
@alyu6351
4 ай бұрын
@@giovanni-ed7zq yeah yeah. The "ukraine isnt allowed to use american artillery and rockets on russian soil" is their "only" problem
@giovanni-ed7zq
4 ай бұрын
@@alyu6351 the talk changed last few days so the wording is actually they can only use it for defensive and not offensive. blinken changed his wording also. i believe with russia exploiting the terms to their advantage in next week or so, the americans likely change their stance saying if its for defensive they they can hit russian troop concentrations on other side of border within 90km of border as long as its not followed up by a counter attack into russian territory is the reports floating out there. so russia may get a surprise in following week. and russia likely get caught with their pants down since they just casually stationing large troops concentrations on the other side like they have some shield.
@giovanni-ed7zq
4 ай бұрын
@@alyu6351 its gonna be interesting for sure with ukraine talking to americans about this. as they could easily stop the russian advances before they get into ukraine if they allowed defensive strikes on military targets within 90km of ukraine border moving towards ukraine. its been noted that americans saying what was designed to be used s de-escalation, russia taking advantage to escalate thinking they have a free pass to attack and be agressive so it might lead to a surprise and mass casualty event for russia in a week.
@sadafhusain2059
4 ай бұрын
To me 50k troops is no where enough to take a city like kharkiv judging by they needed 100k+ to take much smaller bakhmut. they mostly doing a diversionary attack to take troops away from donbass front since donbass is the bare minimum Russia needs to call the whole thing a success
@tomk3732
4 ай бұрын
Ukraine no longer has troop numbers...
@sadafhusain2059
4 ай бұрын
@@tomk3732 they can still cause a lot of damage with artillery and fpv drones in a defensive scenario... Also troops are not only use for offence but also for manning occupied territory. At max Russia will take territories to bring kharkiv inside shelling range and shell it for months before they actually try to take it. Thats what they do usually....
@yellowtunes2756
4 ай бұрын
It doesn't matter how many soldiers Russia has there. The more important thing is how many soldiers does Ukraine have in comparison to Russia in that sector
@tomk3732
4 ай бұрын
@@sadafhusain2059 maybe. But given the state of UA army Russia may just go for the city or for say Sumy region.
@mountainjew1474
4 ай бұрын
@@tomk3732given state of Russian state West and China needs to start negotiations about spheres of influence. Ural being dividing line.
@imnackeredsirnackered948
4 ай бұрын
Russia has been mobilizing for a long time. My guess is that since they might have a manpower advantage, they are going to launch multiple offensives to vastly over stretch Ukraine's defenses/ reserves and supplies. If they launch a small offensive in Kharkiv, Sumy and maybe Chernihiv then this could overwhelm Ukraine defenders in the Donbass region forcing them to give up the Donbass in order to preserve their three other oblasts. However, this relies on Russia not only have a large army in its other fronts but also a large reserve force and then forces to spare for their other small offensives.
@rmdomainer9042
4 ай бұрын
"multiple offensives" sounds like an utter failure. Like early 2022.
@Smarcue2025
4 ай бұрын
@@rmdomainer9042militaries learn, and the Russian army is not the same as it was in 2022. They have an overwhelming manpower advantage now
@rmdomainer9042
4 ай бұрын
@@Smarcue2025 Literally the "Russia Stronk" meme.
@Smarcue2025
4 ай бұрын
@@rmdomainer9042 well yea theyre using scouting parties to attack kharkov while still having more than 20,000+ soldiers behind the border waiting to be deployed lol they have stupid numbers
@m1l3s27
4 ай бұрын
Not really, you shouldn't underestimate Russian manpower advantages. Doesn't mean they've suddenly become tactical geniuses, but it's become obvious Ukraine is having manpower issues, and unlike Russia, they're not recruiting from jails or pressuring non ethnic Russians from far provinces into service. Is that fair? Obviously not. However nothing is fair in war. Russia has 3x Ukraine's population, and with Putins successful retention of the presidency, following the "election," he has more sway in increasing mobilization. @@rmdomainer9042
@samuelhaldane4717
4 ай бұрын
Why do you wrongly accent the word Kharkiv on the final syllable? It's accented on the first syllable in both Ukrainian and Russian.
@MsMommyMemer
4 ай бұрын
Battle of Kharkiv II: Useless tactics boogaloo
@keegandecker4080
4 ай бұрын
There’s an awful lot of attacks for it to be a feint, seems more like a secondary objective to the Donbas
@BazzBrother
4 ай бұрын
when all attacks are tasked with success than the ones that fail are simply reclassified as feints.
@keegandecker4080
4 ай бұрын
@@BazzBrother honestly it reminds me of the Brusilov offensive from World War I
@gideonmele1556
4 ай бұрын
They want to take it eventually so it looks like a case of “push as far as you can” while forcing Ukraine to divert resources to it. It could also be a probing attack or simply a play with what they have at the moment since it’s mostly a slow crawl near stalemate.
@nicholasgutierrez9940
4 ай бұрын
They are doing recon in force now. As long as Russia can arm men, their frontline will continue to grow. They really messed up in the beginning but their industry is leaning more towards military equipment now.
@2011blez
4 ай бұрын
Ukraine needs to train in place the 200k expats in Poland
… and Thanks for the detailed update on the situation, William .. 💙💛💙
@gbeziuk
4 ай бұрын
No, Russia does not feel a time pressure.
@p.d.stanhope7088
4 ай бұрын
Add the recent Putin & Xi - "Yes, we're still best buds & the U.S. is yadda yadda," meeting.
@GizzyDillespee
4 ай бұрын
Are you sure that's how it went?
@AmericanEmperor
4 ай бұрын
What a meaningless drivel.
@busboy262
4 ай бұрын
Don't forget that we get to watch this summer why the Kakhovka Dam was built in the 1st place. Virtually no agriculture will exist in Crimea anymore. And the few Russian war tourists will have to bring their own water. At least until the water - boat/train/truck arrives. Russians love a good desert.
@clarkjanes3094
4 ай бұрын
If only the UA and its allies had not taken their eyes off the Kerch bridge...
@erikriza7165
4 ай бұрын
I lost track. Is this the third day yet of the Special Military Operation?
@AngelGarcia-zm8od
4 ай бұрын
Yes, ukraine is winning...
@AngelGarcia-zm8od
4 ай бұрын
@@glintongordon6811 let him cope...
@erikriza7165
4 ай бұрын
@@glintongordon6811 Maybe i am wrong. I thought I remembered someone in Russia saying that it would take about three days. Or maybe someone else said it, and it wasn't true. I dont remember. That was a couple of years ago.
@daniser87
4 ай бұрын
@@erikriza7165false memory. Mark Milley said that.
@私はクソな中国人です
4 ай бұрын
Ukraine is in a bad spot and only getting worse.
@JimWright1950
4 ай бұрын
Dumbest account of the conflict I've read.
@DonaldPrizwan
4 ай бұрын
honestly have no clue why they have waited this long to begin the special buffer operation and extend the distance of total frontline. lines on maps and such.
@sircatangry5864
4 ай бұрын
Because they planned to do it later, with more soldiers and resources, but aid package was approved earlier than expected so they rushed the entire operation. Remember those talks about "mega russian offensive" somewhere in summer? This should've been it.
@nicholasgutierrez9940
4 ай бұрын
Same reason as in WW1. Russia had more population than the entirety of the central powers. But could only afford to equip a fraction of that. Russia can field millions but that doesn’t mean they can also arm them. War is about the management of logistics not strategy anymore. It’s why Russia only used 150k troops in the initial invasion. Because that’s what they could arm. Except that was based off of lies and was more like 100k in reality.
@cameronspence4977
4 ай бұрын
@@sircatangry5864Well that, and that they simply didn't have the extra troops to do it before
@yellowtunes2756
4 ай бұрын
@@sircatangry5864what aid package has to do with anything? Russia is still out-producing the entire NATO and therefore outgunning Ukraine. Since 2022 some people were talking about some potential big Russian offensive and some pro Ukrainian NPCs were celebrating every time nothing happened
@sircatangry5864
4 ай бұрын
@@yellowtunes2756 So this is why their invasion stopped when they reached first town in Kharkiv oblast?
@Commsfarage
4 ай бұрын
Shipments are a drop in the ocean compared to Russias stock piles
@charlesnone4628
4 ай бұрын
putin : stand right here in front of this window let me take a photo
@DanBlabbers
4 ай бұрын
Only $12 billion will actually be for weapons and they need to be manufactured. It won’t make a difference.
@berlinkozyreva
4 ай бұрын
Most of the equipment being given was made decades ago. Most in storage The money is being used to make new equipment which will be used by US military
@superspies32
4 ай бұрын
And worse, Israrl already prepaid so all weapons companies are overclocked their line for Israel, it will taje at least few years before Ukraine received new batch, as if Israel finished Gaza campaign fast.
@berlinkozyreva
4 ай бұрын
@@superspies32 are you saying they are going to make new Bradley's and M 777 Howitzers for Ukraine? Because that is what is being sent.
@superspies32
4 ай бұрын
@@berlinkozyreva youtube constantly deleted my comments. @@berlinkozyreva 155mm arty shells, missiles for Patriot (this thing can be solved temporarily since Israel retired them all last month), ammunitions for soldiers, for Bradleys, air to ground missiles and bombs for planes. Israel already emptied entire stockpile and prepaid those. They buy so much so that Lockheed Martin stock doubled its price instantly and their CEO host giant party inside their HQ.
@superspies32
4 ай бұрын
@@berlinkozyreva @@berlinkozyreva 155mm arty shells, missiles for Patriot (this thing can be solved temporarily since Israel retired them all last month), ammunitions for soldiers, for Bradleys, air to ground missiles and bombs for planes. Israel already emptied entire stockpile and prepaid those. They buy so much so that Lockheed Martin stock doubled its price instantly and their CEO host giant party inside their HQ. KZitem delete my comments 4rd time
@louisgiokas2206
4 ай бұрын
A concomitant consequence of this operation may be a speeding up of the deployment of troops from various European countries to Ukraine. There has already been an offer from some Baltic countries. Frankly, I think the US should plan on basing two full heavy mechanized corps in Eastern Europe (Poland, Finland, the Baltics, etc.). During the Cold War (I miss the Cold War) the US had between 300K and 500K troops in Europe. The level today is 50K. Large deployments in Europe would also be a big help for recruitment into the US Army. If the US did this, it would free up troops from those "front line" states to go into Ukraine as backup to Ukranian forces. This would allow Ukraine to move more forces to the front line, with substantial allied reserves to immediately back them up if something happened.
@Who-Dat42
4 ай бұрын
This channel needs more maps under lines, and that's a hill I will die on.
@Yuattas
4 ай бұрын
Considering pro ukraine russians were just attacking belogrod i dont think its been an inactive front
@DannoGames-xz2vl
4 ай бұрын
Army Group North has 50,000 soldiers. Not enough to take Kharkiv. When Russia has 100,000 troops in the North, then the move into Kharkiv may happen.
@howtoappearincompletely9739
4 ай бұрын
Didn't some Russian source say they'd need 300K to take Kharkiv? They might get those numbers eventually, but not soon.
@gideonmele1556
4 ай бұрын
It still pushes Ukraine to divert resources which looks to be the Russian goal
@rmdomainer9042
4 ай бұрын
@@howtoappearincompletely9739 Yes, Solovyov said that Russia is unable to take the city.
@geoffworley5275
4 ай бұрын
Russia merely has to advance artillery within range of the city.
@tomk3732
4 ай бұрын
Rapid re-deployment.
@efghggdxlmfn33
4 ай бұрын
Attritional wars require their own ‘Art of War’ and are fought with a ‘force-centric’ approach, unlike wars of manoeuvre which are ‘terrain-focused’. They are rooted in massive industrial capacity to enable the replacement of losses, geographical depth to absorb a series of defeats, and technological conditions that prevent rapid ground movement. In attritional wars, military operations are shaped by a state’s ability to replace losses and generate new formations, not tactical and operational manoeuvres. The side that accepts the attritional nature of war and focuses on destroying enemy forces rather than gaining terrain is most likely to win.
@mitropoulosilias
4 ай бұрын
YOU HAVE NO IDEA OF WHAT YOU TALKING ABOUT
@RichardTaylor1630
4 ай бұрын
The "biggest escalation" comes with a cost. The current casualty numbers are crazy (as I noted elsewhere in a reply, but some people don't read replies). Per AFU, ruzzian combat losses this month average 1250 per day, a total for May thus far of 25,000. Extrapolated to the end of the month, that would be 38,800, or a yearly pace of 460,000. But with the numbers for the first four months already baked into the cake, as it were, I'm projecting a total of 419,000 ruzzian casualties for 2024 as a whole. Adding such a figure for 2024 to the 360,000 men lost as of 31 December last, that would put ruzzia at a total of about 779,000 men eliminated by the end of 2024 in this "three day special military operation." If Ruzzia continues to press this hard while giving their troops so little protection, at some point the aggressors will simply crack. Sure, ruzzia is a big country, but it can't throw away the lives of its young men at this rate. Those 779,000 men represent more than three percent of the entire ruzzian male population aged 18 to 45. Imagine what would have happened in the USA if, during 34 months of the Vietnam War, the equivalent number of American men had been killed or severely wounded. That figure would be 1.2 MILLION, as compared with the actual figures of 40,000 KIA and 105,000 seriously wounded (total 145,000) in the three peak years of the Vietnam conflict (1967-69). The chart of Vietnam War casualties present a sharp "V" of escalating losses from 1964 through 1968, with a decline thereafter almost exactly matching the increases from 1964 to 1968. At the peak, you had the riots at the Democrat Convention and the other signs of exasperation on the part of those opposed to US participation in the war effort. The brainwashed ruzzian people will tolerate more slaughter of their men than Americans would. Nevertheless, I still expect them to hit a breaking point in the next year, as they are forced to suffer up to some EIGHT TIMES the losses, proportionately to population, that the US did in Vietnam.
@MrLou345
4 ай бұрын
Everyone is missing a few key points - Russia might have manpower advantage yes, but they sure as hell don't have the number of tanks, planes, cruise missiles and armoured vehicles they had at the beginning of the war. You bring 15,000 soldiers with no hardware, you get 15,000 dead people REAL quick. Now 15,000 tanks, that's a different thing altogether. I have been to Kharkov many times and been to the border of Russia. Just open fields and large farm land, but once you get to the city of Kharkov, people are everywhere.
@tomk3732
4 ай бұрын
Yes, they have now more equipment.
@davidl.7317
4 ай бұрын
Russia will lose yet another war. Putin has made a terrible mistake.
@seeitasitis
4 ай бұрын
Are you on ground war? How you knows that have you ever heard about drones
@yastyman
4 ай бұрын
"but they sure as hell don't have the number of tanks, planes, cruise missiles" lol... you are pure relict! wow!
@seeitasitis
4 ай бұрын
@@yastyman your hoping that they don't have equipment but they do have so all your hopes will just stay in your head untill you come to reality
@Goulmy86
4 ай бұрын
But with the cross border raids, wasnt that done to provoke a reaction from Russia? This kinda looks like an over reaction they might want, if the prepared their positions properly...
@nicholasbunio
4 ай бұрын
Putin doesn't have the men or equipment to take Kharkiv city. Even Russian MoD says they'd need at least 350,000 men to take the city. Which is about 60% of their entire deployed army in Ukraine. At best it's a buffer zone to stop attacks into Belgorod.
@thefirstkingdogo1126
4 ай бұрын
Where did you get this?
@nicholasbunio
4 ай бұрын
@@thefirstkingdogo1126 reread my comment plz
@alexvaulin1140
4 ай бұрын
Yea, you forgot to say that Putin out of missiles, tanks, economy collapsing only shovels left
@nicholasbunio
4 ай бұрын
@@thefirstkingdogo1126 reread the comment plz
@nicholasbunio
4 ай бұрын
@@alexvaulin1140 so you're what, disagreeing with Russian MoD's own assessment?? :D :D And btw... why hasn't Russia taken all of Donbas, let alone Chasiv Yar? Why mobilize the economy and (per RT this past week) need to increase tank production and refurbishments by 350%?
@johnwalsh4857
4 ай бұрын
its not battle of Kharkov 2 but 3, the 2nd one occured in 2023 when the Russians threw about 150K troops and several hundred tanks in a eastern Ukraine towards Kharkov offensive, that one failed badly due to heavy Ukrainian resistance and bad kaput Russian logistics , the Russians redeployed these forces to the Donbass. This 3rd try is pathetic supposedly 50K men a few hundred tanks and lots of Chinese golf carts, what is different is the heavy use of Russian drones and glide bombs, along with many of the Russian troops being third world foreign volunteer suckers, , well they failed badly.
@jron20r51
4 ай бұрын
How much to Ukraine....Billy you are full of it..15 billion, the rest to the MIC...Get it right cowboy. and who uses it? 50 year olds
@streetjustice4287
4 ай бұрын
I hope his band name is Blinken182
@thesecretformula1337
4 ай бұрын
Absolutely brilliant work mate, ta
@robertmaybeth3434
4 ай бұрын
Russia's own tactics preclude any kind of long term success or any holding of stolen land anywhere along their front. Russia is simply using the same strategy they did during WW2, namely, attacking at several points then immediately reinforcing whoever seems to be advancing. But Russia simply lacks the forces, particularly the man-power, to fight a war this way anymore so such attacks are inevitably hollow and doomed to failure every time. Because even if the attack advances there are no reserve forces to exploit any battlefield successes. Nor even enough men to occupy captured ground taken during such offensives. And worst of all, for the Russians, their leadership is incompetent at every level. When their own commanders can come up with no better tactics than the same ones they used in 1945, it is proof-positive of this.
@kinghunternick1365
4 ай бұрын
More lines on maps
@matthewn1805
4 ай бұрын
wow, such an original comment, how did you manage to think it!
@kinghunternick1365
4 ай бұрын
@@matthewn1805 just what the people want
@eagleadjusters2938
4 ай бұрын
@robgrey6183
4 ай бұрын
Lines on maps = billions for the grifters in Kiev.
@bishopofsahs
4 ай бұрын
@@matthewn1805 It’s not hard to think
@PeanutsDadForever
4 ай бұрын
Thanks for another great video!🇦🇺👴🏻
@keeperofthecheese
4 ай бұрын
Russia knows that the bulk of Ukraine's missile systems are in the eastern and southern theatres. Kharkivs defences are mainly trench and mechanised infantry based. So Ukraine's going to have to shift hardware north fairly fast to stop a salient from developing.
@doolittlegeorge
4 ай бұрын
I think Russia is broke and since Belgorod is basically a distant suburb of Moscow Russia could build up their forces there, did build up their forces there then attacked. This has lead to the deadliest week of the War for Russia as of yet for no appreciable gains and now brought fully the 2nd largest City in Ukraine fully into Battle. Over time it appears Ukraine has gained the ability to wear down Russia as a consequence.
@TipuraT
4 ай бұрын
Thanks to this war I realized: this and many other english speaking channels are pure propaganda. I hope at least you get paid for this bull...
@KianFloppa
4 ай бұрын
you simply believe your ruzzian tv sponsored by putin propaganda more
@VMax-vv3eu
4 ай бұрын
Someone with intelligence revealed lately that Russia's intent is to take Kharkiv city and then STOP. But then if Ukraine fought too hard Russia would be willing to continue advancing. So if the city fell Ukraine should give cessation a chance.
@fertfert4661
4 ай бұрын
Мне интересно, реально остались упыри, считающие, что Украина может победить? Изначально ж было всё ясно, простая математика. Только переговоры могут спасти то население Украины, что ещё не полегло под снарядами в наспех вырытых окопах.
@MrDazTroyer
4 ай бұрын
Ukraine forces are not getting $61B in arms. The lion share isn't even leaving the US, then a big chunk is going to Ukraine as economic aid to pay wages etc. Then you have the fact Ukrainian military is extremely short of troops, all the munitions in the world won't help if they can't use them on mass.
@Agamon
4 ай бұрын
_________MAPS-----------------------
@arnesieper8332
4 ай бұрын
just a quick observation: if basically all the military masterminds of our time can not agree on there being a single reason for russian renwed attacks on kharkiv, maybe ther isnt one but rather a multitude of reasons. it is probably true that, since ukraine is (among otehr things) personal constrained, russia stands to gain a potential davantage by stretching ukraines forces thin. a good point can also be made for a certain desperation, where russia tries to capture as much as possible before american arms (and czechian shells) arrive in mass. there is the potential morale-impact in both ukraine and its western allies, IF (and thats a pretty big if) russia manages to capture kharkiv once again. what is certainly not true is that this is an economy of force operation, a diversion to drain ukrainian combat power from elsewhere, and then attackeg in the south. because russia is throwing and losing disproportionate numbers of men and material at this "new" frontline but... a cnyic might observe, that the russian general responsible for the norther front is the same guy that was made the russian scapegoat when ukraine retook kharkiv. maybe that guy seeks a way to redeem himself, to come back into the good graces of his benefactors. a cynic might also observe that a lot of the russian elites seem to be scrambeling, the power games have spilled out to the open. putin needs something to show his elites, a sign of progress and success, otherwise there is always the risk of some kind of desertion from his crownies. and any risk greater than zero is to high for a dictator...
@avex3903
4 ай бұрын
lots of poor coping nafo bots 🥺
@nonearlylove
4 ай бұрын
Go Home Russia..! Poland gettin very Nervous..! And Ready..! Poland = NATO..!
@q-m-q1362
4 ай бұрын
Excuses for Ukraine will continue until the end of this exercise?
@ZontarDow
4 ай бұрын
Excuses? The offensive has already fallen apart.
@q-m-q1362
4 ай бұрын
@@ZontarDow Well the sympathizers and apologists are saying that it's because of lack of weapons and that they will do better after the "Aid package arrives" I don't know why it's so hard to sit with the Russians and address their issues instead of what Macron is saying that ww3 is more preferable
@craftsman40
4 ай бұрын
Had Ukraine not keep striking Belgorod, Russia would not have opened that front towards Kharkov. After numerous warnings from Russia to stop doing this to no avail, there you go, another frontline.
@mihailos8701
4 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video, and for your work in general, I appreciate your efforts
@michaelgideon8944
4 ай бұрын
I saw this earlier but now there is a BBC report confirming that the city was left without fortifications. The Russians just came in unopposed with minimal cost. Maybe this was just a target of opportunity due to Ukrainian mismanagement.
@thornshar
4 ай бұрын
Fourth possibility: Russia doesn't have much of a strategy, except "push harder", and this is it. Lapin is rumored to be the general in charge of the Kharkiv offensive, after all, and he's not the Russian general held in highest regard by military experts.
@edwinhuang9244
4 ай бұрын
Given that Russia paid dearly from the "We'll push into Ukraine and win" mentality, I have doubts. Because that would mean that RUssia has learned nothing from the entire conflict. Which... If that's the case... will most likely make every competent analysis question reality.
@n8club
4 ай бұрын
France, Poland and other countries could set up well-paid volunteer associations to guard the border with Belarus. This would free Ukrainian soldiers for the Eastern Front.
@jerryb.9754
4 ай бұрын
American policy of not using our weapons to fire into Russia is another mistake. Russian troops were assembling on border but Ukraine could not destroy them when they were most vulnerable. However, Ukraine had advance warning but since all their best troops have been killed, due to American policy, they were unable to take effective action.
@muhammadjijosahaidi1331
4 ай бұрын
Before the special military operations, Ukrainian force already to attack Donbass region@ Lugansk and Donestk republic...after this 2 Republic want to separate from Ukraine regime...
@RobertoAtkinson-q3x
4 ай бұрын
Russia has a lot of artillery and troop concentration just inside Russia close to the Ukrainian border and Ukraine may get permission from the US and England to strike them with long range missiles. Ukraine may get permission because they are military targets and Russia is using artillery to strike civilian targets.
@IronWarrior86
4 ай бұрын
Blinken played guitar in Kiev as a poke in the eye of Russia.
@maryannedouglas
4 ай бұрын
Personally i think it's simply a 'Russia Stronk' meme. They're doing it because they can. There's no plan. Russia doesn't do 'plans'.
@polarper8165
4 ай бұрын
Ukraine has poor defensive planning?
@thefirstkingdogo1126
4 ай бұрын
Can't play chess with few pieces
@lorycotiga4231
4 ай бұрын
Scarsissima
@kubaebo6930
4 ай бұрын
61 Billion sounds impressive but really how much of this money will ukraine spend on what they really need or America will spend it for them on what they want to dispose off not necessarily what ukraine needs.. veey sad indeed.
Пікірлер: 949