Example Case Analysis by Alan Robertshaw Esq. and me: kzitem.info/news/bejne/sKqiqZ-ue5Wrf4Y
@annakarenina3188
2 жыл бұрын
Oh gods Daniel what is this new fangled technology pdf computer witchcraft stuff?! I know our courts have gone/are going paperless, but I so prefer my bundles to be paper: can scrawl all over and make notes on, and Post-It notes and then my own pro-forma for tribunal questions. How on earth do you cope without pen/paper copies? 💜💜
@annakarenina3188
2 жыл бұрын
Ps... On serious note, may be worth seeing if Colonel Kurtz can do a double-up / triple-up with you, herself and maybe Mr Robertshaw.... She's an academic (post doc) in media, and she's been following JD case from start, plus the much more wild Marilyn Manson case. I was wondering if doing a cross-channel thing, where she brings in the knowledge she has from Manson re: JD and how it may be useful information re: the UK trial (as in VA they kept referencing Manson almost every day, before he filed to sue Evan Rachel Wood and Illma Gore). Then also take hypothetical counterparts of ERW and MM for the UK: like if ERW & MM were in the UK, which laws would come into play with both, and therefore how people here in similar bizarre situations (I've no presumption of guilt or innocence before the trial obviously, but the evidence appears at this stage to be in Manson's favour).... How people in such circumstances in the UK could potentially fight such a case (with all the caveats of not legal advice). I just think it'd be an interesting hypothetical exercise, possibly illuminate some evidence about JD and things useful for UK re-opening, as he was at events that AH claims violence took place..... And cross seed audience to each others channels..... She's meticulous, and follows the evidence, and is a really sweet and smart woman who was fans of neither, but believes in justice.
@annakarenina3188
2 жыл бұрын
Finishing watching this video -- yes, speak to Colonel Kurtz, as these actions in liminey bring in aspects of the Manson case..... It's wild, strongly parallels, theres a journalism source saying AH & ERW co-conspired..... But this time, has strong evidence.
@user-fc8qg9vx8t
2 жыл бұрын
I noticed in the introduction and summary portion, regarding Heard’s “Supplemental Plea in Bar by Letter Opinion and Order,” has a date of August 17, 2022. Is that a deadline for the plea, or is it an error? If it is an error on the date e.g. it should have read August 17, 2021; can Heard’s team use this as another attempt to get this case overturned?
@sabrinaotterson446
2 жыл бұрын
@@annakarenina3188 y
@aprilfox1057
2 жыл бұрын
Blaming blaming blaming, no accountability. Sadly, U.K. trial was a sham.
@ladyhawk7483
2 жыл бұрын
Heard was a witness not a party so it should never be allowed. Uk trial needs serious attention
@Jennifermcintyre
2 жыл бұрын
That case makes the UK justice system look like a joke… how was that judge allowed to preside over a case with countless conflicts of interest!!
@iluvdissheet
2 жыл бұрын
I dont think it was a sham....the judge just believed Amber. If anything, that specific judge should be questioned, not the entire system.
@Twittershouldceasetoexist
2 жыл бұрын
It really was
@Twittershouldceasetoexist
2 жыл бұрын
@@iluvdissheet the judge was biased enough to ignore all the evidence from Johnny and just takes it from one side
@spymaine89
2 жыл бұрын
nothing presented to the jury could be more powerful than heard herself. on the stand she presented an evil guilty manifestation. , the verdict was written on her face.
@alpine_newt
2 жыл бұрын
Sadly for her, it also showed casting directors just how poor of an actress she is.
@treetrout3987
2 жыл бұрын
Well put.
@chainreaction1703
2 жыл бұрын
@@alpine_newt lmao
@andreacarter8202
2 жыл бұрын
Heards own words brought her down.
@Jesssssss93
2 жыл бұрын
@@alpine_newt “Excuse me? I got that role by auditioning” 🤪😂
@ThankfulQue
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Andrea Burkhart and those who funded the acquisition.
@lilatoff
2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely. She did an amazing thing in obtaining and sharing these documents.
@alabamatrixie7379
2 жыл бұрын
The people funded it and the remaining moneys donated to children's hospital! Awesome!
@suedyett2988
2 жыл бұрын
The woman and her pals were waiting for JD to get home to jump him and I feel, to cause serious harm. The police came too soon…they did not expect them to get there that quickly. Bff’s don’t hide in a closet or another area of the home, unless you are up to no good. She told the police that they didn’t mean to call the police the 2nd time…. The male friend tried to stop the police from coming into the home, but the officers strongly (respectfully) came into the home. AH told the police that she was fine and didn’t need the police. Now make me believe that this woman wasn’t up to something.
@bonnieabrs1003
2 жыл бұрын
IMHO I believe ah & cohorts planned to harm JD. It became plan 1 when she found she wasn’t in his will & he wanted a post nuptial agreement.
@goldenautumn3073
2 жыл бұрын
This entire sideshow has simply beggared belief because what really is the truth has constantly been confirmed over and again. The fact that almost violent dissatisfaction and protest has been permitted to continue, especially publicly, on the part of the loser, is even harder to believe. Shouldn't have been allowed or tolerated - it's about time a level of decency and respect was brought back into this equation and the true wrongdoer appropriately punished under law.
@cbh9298
2 жыл бұрын
JD is very lucky to be alive!
@JanNan
2 жыл бұрын
@@cbh9298 I have said this all along, if JD had not got away from this situation, I truly believe we would have been watching a totally different trial, I put AH on the same parr as Jodie Arias, with AH money and fame, Jodie, if she couldn't have him no one would. RIP Travis Alexander 🙏 😢
@montanabowlady5896
2 жыл бұрын
I already signed the petition and URGE others who believe that JD should have the UK JUDGEMENT reheard to PLEASE PLEASE sign the petition found under description of this stream.
@musestudio7075
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for mentioning this. I signed it too, but it needs a lot more signatures and I think it will get them if more people knew about it. There are 4 other important petitions which got a ton of signatures at first but stalled after the trial: "Remove Amber Heard as ACLU Ambassador of Women’s Rights", "Remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2", "Amber Heard does NOT deserve to play Mera in the next Aquaman film", and, "Remove Amber Heard as L'Oreal Spokesperson". Please sign and share these also.
@CaliWeHo
2 жыл бұрын
Done. 😉
@sambas9257
2 жыл бұрын
The petition for removing Amber Heard from Aquama reached 4.6 milions. It didn't have any consequencies.Warner Bros still continues to protect her role and position.Another trial in UK is useless if people doesn't understand why he lost. In a new trial it will happen the same. Is it possible that the judge chosen for the past trial had so strict connections with The Sun?How could it be prevented the next judge will not have the same connections?
@Slitheringpeanut
2 жыл бұрын
Not going to happen, the judge in that case has to sign off on having it reheard, which would imply that his own judgement was wrong. Worse, it's clear that he was compromised from the word go. His son for example worked with the Sun article writer when they both worked for the affiliated radio station. The Judge's WIFE hosted a party that both Heard and her UK lawyer attended earlier. That judgement should be overturned and that judge should be shown the way to jail, but it won't happen.
@aloha_oe311
2 жыл бұрын
Where do I sign?? Is there a link.. The Uk trial was indeed very biased.
@stephanypasnin1474
2 жыл бұрын
Im no johnny depp fan but her accusations were so ridiculous it wasnt hard to see who the abuser was.
@vickis2170
2 жыл бұрын
The part of her already saying a smear campaign was going on it is utter BS. Most of us had no clue who the hell she was until this trial she truly isn't as remarkable as she thinks she is. And the campaign she and her minions have done to JD and his team is ridiculous. Any smear campaign was her and her team against JD. She lied and hoped not to be caught period. Thank you so much for your videos between you and others we get a true read on all of this.
@aloha_oe311
2 жыл бұрын
Which is funny because a “smear campaign” is exactly what she started in the first place to destroy Depp. It just so happen that the table have turned to her, and she’s calling out that same issue just because it’s happening to her now.. What a dumbo.
@Boundwithflame23
2 жыл бұрын
Right? There was a smear campaign going on. Just not against her lmao
@charzemc
2 жыл бұрын
The smear campaign has been perpetrated by heard against Johnny Depp. All the YT channels that are currently being attacked by Richie Albertini, are the truth tellers & they are using a reused material excuse, not harrassment. Richie Albertini has also implicated AH in this harrassment & attacks on content creators.
@juliad.6372
2 жыл бұрын
Actually it is very clear..,she got attention by simply being with JD..plus she p,aged some roles...which obviously went to her head..unable to see reality...therefore planned a lot of false stories.. in her mind were only succes for her... Little did she know about self...and now reality manifests in her face..Yet she continues the lies... All her doings really...If she would be rational..then would reorganize her life...stop demanding money for which she has not worked..,sadly this is not the case.. I am confident of judicial system..she 'll be handled accordingly..
@leasashaver2263
2 жыл бұрын
I’m the same as you. I had no idea who she was.
@kateeast7352
2 жыл бұрын
How can Elaine show such a disrespect for the law as she showed to this Court and still be allowed to practice.She disregarded the judges motions on quite a few rules and out and out lied on things not meant to be in evidence.
@sarahlang2119
2 жыл бұрын
I know right!
@goldenautumn3073
2 жыл бұрын
Totally correct. They were PATHETIC.
@tonyhawk123
2 жыл бұрын
Desperate client attracted a desperate lawyer. Who in turn paid for desperate expert witnesses. When you've got Amber Heard as a client, desperation is dialled up to 11.
@100Mickl
2 жыл бұрын
They kept mentioning it throughout - Elaine is a dirty player
@pitchsydneyguy4554
2 жыл бұрын
This elderly woman lawyer Elaine should be disbarred for her lack of integrity, honesty, respect, rudeness to court and juries and Johnny Depp!
You have to imagine Heard delivering those lines like Gary Oldman in _The Professional,_ which is admittedly hard because Oldman is a *much* better actor.
@emma9348
2 жыл бұрын
Quoting gary oldman in leon!! Lol
@suedyett2988
2 жыл бұрын
The judge wouldn’t let JD present much of anything. He would get shut down every time he tried to bring forth evidence.
@linusgustafsson2629
2 жыл бұрын
That is my favorite part of the justice system. "Facts that prove your argument? Nah, we can't include that." Why would any court ever deny evidence? It shouldn't even be valid to claim "It is too late" or "This only proves the other part is a patological liar and doesn't prove that they lied about the case". All things that are relevant to find the truth should be presented and included.
@zephyrbear
2 жыл бұрын
It seems as though AH and Elaine were expecting as easy a ride as the UK trial in Virginia and they were totally unprepared for Judge Azcarate and Ben Chew & Co throwing that plan into complete disarray! Try as she might, Elaine totally failed to make any reference to the UK trial or its diabolical verdict thanks to the relentless, valid objections raised by Camille Vasquez until she’d been utterly ground into the floor with nothing to come back with. If anyone is interested, @EmilyDBaker has also done the first one of these looks at the unsealed documents (she’ll be doing the next one on Tuesday) where she has covered those “sealed” UK files that you can’t mention.
@Julia-uh4li
2 жыл бұрын
Emily got them from Andrea! Yes, Andrea is our champion!! 💙
@mightymidas2021
2 жыл бұрын
Totally unprepared for an unbias judge unlike the UK judge
@hevchip741
2 жыл бұрын
I can't believe Elaine and Amber mentioned the UK case more than once. Elaine was treading on thin ice making accusations against many witnesses. Thanks for mentioning the JD appeal.
@mindyrolston3915
2 жыл бұрын
They were also two different cases JD was suing the sun over a title and the UK. Johnny sued Amber her over her written op-ed in the United States they're two different things completely
@ianmckinney3446
2 жыл бұрын
The jury used the title in Virginia
@Irene-xs9pc
2 жыл бұрын
@@ianmckinney3446 the uk trial was Johnny Depp against Dan Wooton who worked for the sun rag, who wrote a piece calling out JK Rowling, headline has Rowling gone potty allowing Johnny Depp a wife beater to the role in the film amazing beast’s
@ianmckinney3446
2 жыл бұрын
@@Irene-xs9pc yes and in Virginia the jury used the title...
@GoodtoGaia
2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate the deeper dive into the trial. It’s like watching all the credits after a movie and then getting another small clip payoff at the end!
@kimc.3104
2 жыл бұрын
Never going to die lol
@charzemc
2 жыл бұрын
That's called a post credit scene.
@GoodtoGaia
2 жыл бұрын
@@charzemc 👍🏼
@TheSiriusEnigma
2 жыл бұрын
As a - witness - in the UK trial. AH was NOT subjected to discovery (disclosure). Meaning, she lied and JD was not allowed to prove she did. The UK judge based his judgment on the fact that “someone who donate 7 millions to charity is a credible witness.”
@arbiter1
2 жыл бұрын
Even after the fact the court knew she lied in AU and plead guilty to perjury.
@TheSiriusEnigma
2 жыл бұрын
@@arbiter1 well. While you are at it, the UK judge completely removed/dismiss an uncontested expert witness testimony because it didn’t fit his narrative. The police officer specifically trained for DV situations that testified that there was no sign of DV when he inspected the scene.
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
That is not the meaning of discovery or disclosure! These two are different concepts.
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
She was a witness in the UK case, a witness for the defence and she is allowed to be cross examined by counsel for the plaintiff to determine the veracity of her evidence. Now, I don't know if she was cross examined or how well it was done, but ordinarily it is permitted.
@TheSiriusEnigma
2 жыл бұрын
@@deang5622 my understanding is that in the UK, a witness is not subjected to discovery unless the judge specifically allows it. And he didn’t. How do you cross examine a liar? A professional actor? If the only thing you can have is his/her words? “Did you give 3.5 million to the charity?” “Yes.” “You Honour, we would like to check if it’s true.” “No.” Pretty much described what happened.
@patriciamaartens1
2 жыл бұрын
Just signed the petition. Come on everybody let's get this done.
@dawndiamond9715
2 жыл бұрын
Where is the petition still looking for it
@Julia-uh4li
2 жыл бұрын
@@dawndiamond9715 In Daniels description. Just scroll down until you see the highlighted link called The Petition.
@eightysea3780
2 жыл бұрын
Is Elaine a manipulative shyster, a terrible lawyer, or just dumb? I've heard her say countless times now "We already won in UK" when they weren't even part of the case except as a witness. If I can figure out that is not the same, what in the world is Elaine's excuse?
@MsJacobowski
2 жыл бұрын
She clearly is a shyster. She even lied to the court for AH, when she said AH had paid for her lawyers, as if she didn't know the insurance was footing her bill. There was an insurance person sitting right behind her in the first row throughout the whole trial for Gods sake and Elaine still shamelessly lied!
@johnsensebe3153
2 жыл бұрын
I think all three. She engages in shady tactics to make up for the fact that she isn't a competent lawyer, because she's dumb.
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
Lawyers are educated intelligent people, so I would say potentially the first two only.
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
She can say it as often as she likes, she did not win in the UK. She was neither the plaintiff or defendant.
@johnsensebe3153
2 жыл бұрын
@@deang5622 You'd think that, wouldn't you?
@cyankirkpatrick5194
2 жыл бұрын
F. Lee Bailey was once a good lawyer but greed and arrogance got in the way of his hindsight and it was his undoing. And it will happen to Eliane as well.
@andreacarter8202
2 жыл бұрын
But F. Lee Bailey was smart. Elaine certainly is not.
@patriciarockwell2227
2 жыл бұрын
OH GOD, Don't put Elaine even in the same category as F. Lee Bailey....smh
@fredarounthwaite1832
2 жыл бұрын
The UK trial was a disgrace. The judge should have recused himself. I tried to sign the petition but it would not send an e:mail to confirm my signature, several times!
@wittnessbe_judged8723
2 жыл бұрын
Never stop helping us to understand the laws in the UK and giving us knowledge you're teaching many people things that they did not know I enjoy every single one of your videos and I watch them all the way to the end
@annemoncrieff3875
2 жыл бұрын
English law. Scots law is different, thank goodness
@mightymidas2021
2 жыл бұрын
English courts are a joke , utter pomp and performance, they are all in each other's pockets and not impartial.
@brendaseager7371
2 жыл бұрын
I am signing this ! Depp had no chance of winning this trial because of lies and conflict!
@hellypoppy5739
2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely clear AH & her team thought they’d win. They were unprepared in large part & the only winners were their bank balances, $6 million fees thus far I believe (paid for by insurance cover)
@jameswells9403
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, even at the verdict she is smirking. Until the verdict is read and you can see her breathing getting shallow...
@julielevinge266
2 жыл бұрын
They should have won,AH Is her own worst enemy. If she hadn’t come up with all that bs about terrible SA & just said that during arguments Depp had hit her? Even if she admitted hitting him back she still could have won. But her allegations with absolutely no collaborating medical evidence is just inconceivable.
@MrNorker77
2 жыл бұрын
As I understand it it was 6 million in fees before the trial started, so it's likely to be higher then the judgement (as trial is what usually is the expensive part)
@charzemc
2 жыл бұрын
The insurance company is now suing her for their money back since she was found to be malicious.
@thekitowl
2 жыл бұрын
@@charzemc go watch the real Laura B it’s a lot more complicated.
@TheTyforseth
2 жыл бұрын
It's very interesting that her own lawyers knew from the start that she was so fucked that they had to start making up conspiracy theories about how everyone that didn't like Ms. Turd was a bot. Her legal team is the kind of "yes man" legal team that Bruce Rivers brought up when he analyzed what Andrew Tate wants in a lawyer. They almost certainly know she did some illegal shit, and her mentality is of course 'I don't talk to lawyers to hear about laws, I just want you to get me out of this shit,' to paraphrase Tate. There's a saying I thought of when I was watching this whole trial play out: "a lawyer is only as good as their client." Her legal team is comprised of some real scumbags, and they all act exactly like her.
@shareenmasher4833
2 жыл бұрын
My feelings exactly
@Jetblast01
2 жыл бұрын
Elaine is definitely that. Here I thought Rottenburn was shady, but he seemed to just do it for the job then moved on. Elaine on the otherhand, her "15-minutes of fame" was getting to her head too much.
@dodosmamma1692
2 жыл бұрын
Birds of a feather and all that……
@jeannettedodge5886
2 жыл бұрын
Totally agree 👍
@reginafetty6374
2 жыл бұрын
@@Jetblast01 I really thought that if Rottenborn didn't have Elaine, he would have had a better job defending her. Elaine seemed to undermind the case. Elaine questions, brought up answers, that ended up being used against AH. I think she would have still lost but I think it would have been less of the fiasco it was. Elaine accused everyone for AH actions, but AH. And the constant 15 minutes of fame to discredit them instead of working the case with facts was just bs.
@cherilogan8761
2 жыл бұрын
I learn something new every single video, heard/Depp trial has so many examples for learning opportunities, it's crazy and I love your breakdowns. Keep it real and keep up the great work.
@cyankirkpatrick5194
2 жыл бұрын
I'll sign the petition for Johnny,it's taken care of.
@Jooniebug
2 жыл бұрын
Amber and Elaine blaming EVERYONE BUT Amber. What a joke. Am surprised they didn't blame aliens from another planet because the LIES Amber told without shaking or stuttering were definitely out of this world. Thanks as always for breaking this down for us this is very useful.
@johnsensebe3153
2 жыл бұрын
It was all due to sunspots.
@susanmccarthy423
2 жыл бұрын
I think the UK should over turn there verdict.
@CsykKrit
2 жыл бұрын
Where verdict?
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
their verdict. Or correctly, their judgment. Civil cases don't have verdicts.
@dynomitenash8970
2 жыл бұрын
Intuitively I sort of knew that the info from the UK really didn't have a dog in this fight here in the United States. Why would an American legal team even attempt to press a ruling from an entirely different country into a case they're working on here? It's as if AH's attorneys think the UK's laws sets some type of precedence in the USA? Good grief, it sounds like they got their law degrees out of a box of Cracker Jacks!
@skipd9164
2 жыл бұрын
The U.K. trial was a planned event with the outcome predetermined. The judge and his family's association with the people involved he should of let another judge hear it. The U.K. corruption would not be exposed except JD proved AH is a fraud. This was the big nail in the coffin for men. It's not over other women are in line
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
The judgement in a UK court is an opinion which is derived from the evidence and testimony presented before the court. And that judgement can be wrong. So it would be entirely inappropriate for a court in another country to rely on that derived opinion: the US should make its own mind up fully based on the facts and only the facts presented before it. There is also a fundamental difference in libel laws in the UK and US where in the US malice needs to be present in an act of libel for a libel claim to be upheld by the US court. That is not the case in the UK . So because of the different laws in the two countries, even if presented with the same same evidence and testimony in the trial, the courts may have to come to a different outcome in order to comply with their respective laws.
@workerdroid290
2 жыл бұрын
Because they are so desperate to fortify their false claims, and the UK trial was a win for them. The UK trial looks very dubious to me, leaning toward corrupt conduct. Her evidence was just accepted, without rebuttal. She is a clever liar, but it’s all come undone now. I hope the UK trial is set aside
@ohsuzyq5297
2 жыл бұрын
AH Team wanted to bring up the UK Judgement because the AH Team did not have a csae, no credible witnesses or evidence. The unsealed documents from the VA trial are revealing how shady elaine was before and during the trial. Fortunately, the JD Team is so brilliant.
@goldenautumn3073
2 жыл бұрын
You bet. Obviously GROSSLY inexperienced - better off as commercial or property lawyers imo.
@farzanamiah7737
2 жыл бұрын
Signed and sent petition to friends and family thanks Daniel love your videos
@paulareynolds4493
2 жыл бұрын
I'm still very interested in hearing things about this case. Especially now with what has been released so please continue. If people don't want to hear it they can turn their headphones off LOL.
@elizabeth84266
2 жыл бұрын
Incredibly Average (you tuber) has never seen before footage of her original deposition that she thought would never be seen and it’s…. Wow… you should definitely check it out!
@CaliWeHo
2 жыл бұрын
👏👏👏😉
@vikkicason9241
2 жыл бұрын
Did you watch the trial? This is CRAZY! I was not a JD fan and sadly tuned in to see how he could wiggle his way out of this. I know I just assumed bc the whole world and mainstream media sided with her.....he was likely guilty. I then realized he was describing events I had lived (although NEVER physical) and she is much like the man I was married to for 15 years. Thank God it was a much smaller scale. She will not give up....I think she truly has told the lie so many times.....she believes it.
@m0L3ify
2 жыл бұрын
It's crazy the lengths Elaine went to to try and sway the jury, bribe the jury, etc., and they still lost because nothing could change how bad a client Amber was.
@MissAndDav
2 жыл бұрын
Elaine even outright lied to the jury in her summing up! Elaine told them that AH had not been able to pay her pledges to the charities "because she had paid 6 million in legal fees" and yet Elaine knew that her legal fees were paid by AHs insurance!
@internetpolification
2 жыл бұрын
@@MissAndDav I mean…why no repercussions for Elaine? I just don’t get it
@godzilla928
2 жыл бұрын
@@internetpolification why? because who gonna pay for another trial, collecting evidence and putting stuff together and then begin the litigation? who gonna do that and why? to 'trivial' to become a serious subject for another proceedings or sth
@ronaldoago-go5907
2 жыл бұрын
@@godzilla928 coz if shes not called out on it it validates lying and cheating by lawyers.
@vicki4936
2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your breakdowns. They are very thorough and easy to understand. YES, I'm still interested as these unsealed docs are very relevant, especially for the appeal. TY @BlackBeltBarrister
@orian-080
2 жыл бұрын
JD's UK trial against The Sun is extremely fishy -- too many discrepancies.
@reneebarger5194
2 жыл бұрын
Why wouldn’t the Sun newspaper sue AH for providing false & fraudulent information for their articles opening a window for liability?
@thekitowl
2 жыл бұрын
They don’t care.
@barbaramcmillan3835
2 жыл бұрын
They definitely don't car, they sold s lot of papers at JD's expense. They're not about to admit that !
@suzannebadger8135
2 жыл бұрын
Soon AH will be blaming her lawyers more then she already has lol. This woman needs to accept she lost because of everything SHE did to JD!
@mandypratt5787
2 жыл бұрын
Really good to hear your description on the things that have gone on behind the scenes prior to court session. It's very sad to hear the arguements from AH in regards to everything is somebody else's fault and not hers. It seems to show her mentality that she is a perfect person and everyone else isn't...
@nounae7409
2 жыл бұрын
Please know dear Barrister That I love all your videos. Your approach and demeanor as well as knowledge and professionalism are amazing. Always enriching and informative to listen to you!!!
@heather3316
2 жыл бұрын
What startles me the most is the Russian affair, how they came out with that one will forever be a mystery
@hoptoit5910
2 жыл бұрын
Most of us appreciate you covering this case. Those that don’t need not watch. I don’t understand why people complain and think they should have control over what the content creator puts out. Thank you for all you share.
@EEmB
2 жыл бұрын
It feels like those who comment for to not report on this might have a interest in being on AH side (not wanting these details come to light) and some might actually be bots, as Umbrella Guy have reported on. Her obsessions with bots feels a bit like "confession through projection".
@Julia-uh4li
2 жыл бұрын
Love that last sentence of yours!!! 💙 Spot in imo.
@grmmyantju8369
2 жыл бұрын
Please keep doing a great job. I love the break down.
@shelleyburr3988
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for continuing a measured and professional breakdown of the legal aspects in this case.
@patriciamaartens1
2 жыл бұрын
We in the UK should be ashamed of ourselves.
@courtney3437
2 жыл бұрын
No, the ones who did wrong should be ashamed of themselves. Not the UK as a whole. 💕 But, I understand that you're saying.
@lindacousins9603
2 жыл бұрын
No the Sun newspaper should have done a better job investigating what Heard was saying and not use the lies to sell their rag.Was everyone taken in with Heard no matter outrageous it was she alleged.
@barb6525
2 жыл бұрын
I wanted to give AHs team the benefit of doubt during the trial, as I found it hard to believe that anyone could act like they did with intention. I was wrong 🤦♀️ They do know exactly what they are doing, and they couldn't care less if it is totally out of order. I hope you continue to do these videos as it is just as interresting to have your legal perspective on this case, as well as the peek behind the curtains of the trial. Thank you for all the effort you put in to make it available and understandable to us ❤️
@alnadaf
2 жыл бұрын
I gather there is nothing comparable to a finding of fundamental dishonesty here!? 🤔😉
@Spacey7
2 жыл бұрын
Of course it's not over & I think it's good to hear what is going on still in this case.
@shelly7909
2 жыл бұрын
I think that it’s very important to people as your self exsplaning difficult or different subjects from helping us all to learn and brake things down into a way that we can understand and having your opinions , taking your time and respect while still upholding the law is a blessing, so thank you 🙏 from us all and especially for are children who will be inspired to be hopefully a solicitor or barrister as your self my daughter is. A self taught artist and my niece is doing drama and law light house has been very helpful to me,xx
@sandyball7954
2 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy your channel and the professional way it’s presented. Thank you for the information and all your hard work!
@Begining2013
2 жыл бұрын
What I've learned by watching this JD/AH trial is: there's probably no punishment for lying, obstruction or provable perjury. Taking an Oath means nothing to some. There appears to be no consequences for lawyers who breech previous court orders or rules. And most trials should be televised (unless objected to by the parties).
@judybertagna4527
2 жыл бұрын
The UK judge should have recused himself. He was biased
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
No. There was a potential conflict of interest which theoretically could have led to bias. You cannot say he was biased, you can only say "potentially biased"
@girlinspired
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all of the continual updates on this fascinating case. Please continue with your analyses and insights, very much appreciated ❤️
@zenamen5221
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for presenting information in a calm, dignified, and highly informative way. It's so needed.
@lailalyberth1926
2 жыл бұрын
As more is revealed, the more surtain i AM that the guilty verdict should stand. AH and team is a disgrace. I have signed the petition, but live in denmark. I dont know if it has a say sincethe trial wqs in the UK
@patriciatreslove146
2 жыл бұрын
Please keep us up to date on this case, especially these documents which we would never understand without explanation.
@zuzauramek9850
2 жыл бұрын
Amber Heard is like Karen: everyone is to blame but her.
@sarahlang2119
2 жыл бұрын
Amber Alert
@merrly20
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing this video with us I’m glad you are helping us understand the legal jargon behind what is going on with this case and for those of us who are not lawyers thank you for helping us understand what is going on legally speaking
@lance134679
2 жыл бұрын
Even though Amber wasn't allowed to mention the UK trial, there were two incidents where they tried to make sure the jury knew. The 1st was when Amber said to look up online who the abuser is during her testimony (against the judge's instructions), obviously in reference to tabloid headlines and the recent UK trial verdict. The 2nd was in Elaine's closing arguments when she said that Johnny already had his opportunity to tell his story and though Ben objected, the damage may have been done. Very sneaky!
@thekitowl
2 жыл бұрын
AH also said “ I’m used to Johnny suing me “ inferring he’s done it before.
@michelleanderson8370
2 жыл бұрын
I find your explanation of how the law effects these items..or how the items are effected by the law...very helpful in understanding the rules of evidence so I thank you for taking the time to share with those of us that enjoy this
@jeanneshultz772
2 жыл бұрын
You make understanding the law, and, motives to sue, easier to interpret. Thank you. WTF is AH even playing at?
@filsanali5830
2 жыл бұрын
Please continue with your content. I'm not a fan of either JD or AH but interested in the legal insight, thought process and quite frankly the rich material in how NOT to do things that AH has provided. I'm pleased that justice has prevailed for JD and hope some balance has been restored in dealing with such accusations regardless of gender. As a woman, I found the whole "believe ALL women" problematic as with anything, there will always be few who exploit it for their own nefarious agenda. The complicity and corruption of the likes of the ACLU was surprising. It would be interesting if you look at the Marilyn Manson situation.
@angelatucker6054
2 жыл бұрын
As a Brit, I am truly ashamed of the UK system.
@tamsin1975
2 жыл бұрын
I love your videos and look forward to how clear, factual and easy to listen to. What you see is what you get. I hope you continue to cover this case for however long is needed. Yes yes more lives on the subjects you are suggesting please ❤️
@BlackBeltBarrister
2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate that, Thank you 😊 🙏 !
@debrastolp5970
2 жыл бұрын
Love your channel!!! Thanx for your breakdowns of the unsealed documents. Plus I am drawn to anything ‘UK’ originally stemming from ALL things ‘RIk Mayall’, whom I adore. So the UK laws and the trail, along with anything else you might share, are completely captivating!! However you decide to make future videos as you described at the end of this one, I’m in!!!
@suedyett2988
2 жыл бұрын
There was a gentleman in the UK trial that knew AH….the judges relative I believe. Could be wrong about relationship, but there were some shady things involved there and here by AH and her team….including EB AH bff and so called journalist.
@mickk8519
2 жыл бұрын
Apparently the judge in the UK Sun trial has a relative that works for the Sun news group or one of their associated companies.
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
I think it was that a son of the judge was involved in either writing the alleged libellous article or that he worked for the newspaper that published the article, giving rise to a potential conflict of interest which theoretically could result in bias by the judge to the newspaper in order to protect the interests of his son. Theoretical, potential, not proven there was a conflict of interest.
@jeanniem2377
2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your time explaining the legal aspects of the trial. I have been learning so much, and I thank you for it.
@Spacey7
2 жыл бұрын
All about her! What about what she's done to JD & all that he's lost!! Wish she'd shut the hell up & disappear!! 🤬🤬
@steved9869
2 жыл бұрын
I LOVE your idea for arbitration and voting. this could really change the way the world do legal issues one day in the distant future! Imagine being a forefather and visionary of that! I would become a member immediately
@Yardahstud
2 жыл бұрын
Like you Steve D, I think this is an amazing idea. As you say, it is visionary. We now have the technology to do it. The world needs transparency now, more than ever.
@nilzagarcia6341
2 жыл бұрын
Great information. Thank you for sharing. Your conversations have really helped clear lots of legal questions I’ve had regarding some of the rulings, introduction of evidence as well as inadmissible evidence and so on. Thank you!
@tamitrigg1337
2 жыл бұрын
Would you mind making the page bigger, so it’s a bit easier to read the words along with you!? Thx very much for doing all this for us! 😊 from Ontario Canada 🇨🇦💖
@thexpozer5389
2 жыл бұрын
Please continue discussing this issue, and ignore the nay-sayers saying to move on! I think they should move on! We love your videos on SCAMber Turd vs JD!
@johnsensebe3153
2 жыл бұрын
Heard needs to move on first.
@LadyBern
2 жыл бұрын
At this point it's not that this trial is being milked but that so many things happened within it and are still happening that it's a great example for certain things, terms, tactics, things I don't know/etc. Without a doubt it's best to discuss some of the current matters now so that we, who knows nothing, are able to understand the significance. This trial being as transparent and public as it was really makes it easy to go back and look to see/ watch what's being discussed or referenced.
@Tiewaz
2 жыл бұрын
Until the SCOTUS had overturned RvW, most Americans hold to the idea that "previous decisions should carry forward." So, talking about the UK trial as being equal to the US one would have had most Americans thinking if he was guilty in one, he would be guilty in this one. But with how the US trial went with their evidence has called into question the UK verdict now.
@peacelove7706
2 жыл бұрын
Not even remotely true…. Only some following AH would think that…
@Tiewaz
2 жыл бұрын
@@peacelove7706 Look, I don't even remotely like AH and not a huge JD fan, either. But I know how "group think" tends to work. Especially if people lean toward trusting authority figures/institutions or think, "Well, if everyone else is going this way, I will, too." Why else would the Big Media have been portraying both sides as they had and have been? To sway opinions. The whole point that AH and her team were leaning on was the "past is prologue" idea that if someone thought he was that way in a law sense elsewhere, then he's that way here. Any "research" the jury would have found, if they would have followed the AH's legal team's "suggestion" would definitely have had potential to skew their views. Granted, the evidence and VA trial would have certainly cast doubt on the media and that previous judgment's accuracy because holy ducks, Batman, WTF is with that woman? (And if the UK trials was brought in, I'm sure they would have been able to bring up the points in the appeal that were raised.) There are times when a defendant's history (in criminal trials) is brought up in trial, but there are rules about it. Usually when the person is a repeat offender. As this was a civil trial, they were desperate to keep JD discredited. If AH could act and kept a cohesive story together and not embellish, she might have been able to pull it off.
@ceuson3
2 жыл бұрын
Please keep covering this. I'm divorcing a narcissist & learn so much about what to expect from a person who will go to any lengths (Russians!) to win. I am better prepared & unlikely to be sidetracked by ridiculousness (Russians!)
@bethl
2 жыл бұрын
Good luck to you!
@chrissylee325
2 жыл бұрын
I love the idea of legal arguments and viewers voting! 😊
@suedyett2988
2 жыл бұрын
A jury needs to make a decision based on both parties evidence.
@donnachampion3169
2 жыл бұрын
Thankyou BBB for helping us understand the legal processes in this case and the effort you put in .. keep up the great work 👌
@marlenebarone9407
2 жыл бұрын
Yes many of us want to hear all the arguments etc all of it ! From every aspect thanks have a great night
@marensweet719
2 жыл бұрын
Do not get me, wrong. I am a huge fan of Judge Penney. She was an incredible judge from beginning to end. Even so, I really wish that having sensed the gravity of the subject matter at hand what it actually would mean for so many real-life survivors like myself that she [Judge Penney] had actually relented and agreed to make a rare exception to her general rule with the defamation case. Instead of merely allowing it to continue from an average of 6 weeks - to a bare minimum of 10-12 weeks at best. Because all truthfulness and with all due respect, there really was so much evidence that I feel as a survivor was far more compelling and even more pertinent for JD's side that literally never saw the light of day which absolutely should have been presented at trial. The fact that AH has similarly been allowed to terrorize every spectrum of social media for the past four consecutive straight months even after she had admitted to torturing JD-hitting him, slamming doors in his face, kicking him out of his own bed and worse is beyond gross and is downright malfeasance on so many levels. I mean, that female would not even let him shower or go to the bathroom like normal and AH and her legal team actually expected the rest of us to believe that should not be considered actual form of domestic abuse according to the legal definition of the term? Perhaps if the defamation case had been extended to ten or even twelve weeks even more people would of had the opportunity to better understand exactly what JD and his entire family were put through at the pernicious hands of AH. And just maybe then the jury would have actually awarded JD the entirety of the original $50 million that he had requested and rightfully denied AH any such reward of any kind including the $2 million dollars which now lives in infamy. How can an actual jury in this day and age be fully expected to render a fair and equally meaningful decision in such a high profile case when in fact so much of the evidence that was presented at trial was was predominantly faked by none other than AH and her own deleterious legal and PR teams? Besides what good does it do to find out the actual truth about AH after the fact and the entirety of the original Fairfax and U.K. trials are over when AH is now purposely terrorizing all of social media over her own lies and faked evidence?
@mymai5859
2 жыл бұрын
As some KZitem lawyers mentioned at the live trial ...this was a Civil case not a Criminal case. Johnny's team had to prove he was defamed & had losses (reputation/money) due specifically to the WaPo Editorial. Yes her violence was evident in the trial but that specifically was not the focus. The team had to prove she knowingly LIED when writing the OpEd. Only if this was a criminal case - where Johnny was the victim of ATurd's vile abuse - then a lot more of her historical actions could be used to give her a sentence. ATurd's last physical abuse was inflicted on Johnny 6 yrs before the Virginia trial...that meant the statute of limitation had expired.
@deang5622
2 жыл бұрын
The faking of evidence is an interesting point. I believe in the US you have a similar concept to us in the UK where written evidence to the court had to be accompanied by a declaration that what is being submitted is truthful. We call it a statement of truth. To knowingly submit a false statement of truth, in that the witness/party says the evidence is true and they know it is not, that is a serious criminal offence - attempting to pervert the course of justice or perjury, which can result in the person being sent to prison
@derek.....
2 жыл бұрын
Amber Heard has been offered a role in the new Marvel movie the fantastic four,which is perfect for her as she is to play the invisible woman,and great for us because we won’t see her extremely bad acting.
@cyankirkpatrick5194
2 жыл бұрын
🧐😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣
@lisafox5801
2 жыл бұрын
Is this role confirmed by Marvel or is this another tactic of her PR team? I'm not being mean only asking.
@bethanychatman9531
2 жыл бұрын
No she hasn't
@alpine_newt
2 жыл бұрын
@@lisafox5801 I think Derek might have been making a joke.
@how_about_naw
2 жыл бұрын
If true then that will be the only Marvel movie since Iron Man 1 that I will not be seeing.
@internetpolification
2 жыл бұрын
So how did Elaine get away with repeated references during the trial to the U.K. trials and in her closing argument to the jury? Why was she not admonished for that? It seems she read the document you refer to and then ignored it
@Teddypally
2 жыл бұрын
I think it was a trap. If one lawyer references something and the other lawyer addresses it, the first lawyer can introduce it into evidence. If the jury doesn't know the reference, its impact on the case is limited. Sort of like when amber named people, Depp's lawyers could introduce those people's testimony.
@TheSiriusEnigma
2 жыл бұрын
That’s “sleazy lawyer” 101. They are not allowed to talk about it, but the judge can only stop them after they did. The trick is to slip just enough.
@starrthompson4927
2 жыл бұрын
Elaine and.her team tried several underhanded things to influence the jury IMO. Remember in Elaine's closing she said the JD walked into the Daily Mail offices with Mr. Waldman and made those statements about the hoak to try to tie JD to the Waldman statements. There was no evidence of that. Do you think that JD would go to the daily mail offices at all when he had other people who he could get to do that for him if needed. AH found the right lawyer when she hired Elaine...unethical.
@internetpolification
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSiriusEnigma but the judge didn’t stop her though?
@TheSiriusEnigma
2 жыл бұрын
@@internetpolification it was too late. The issue is that a judge will not sanction a lawyer for “minor” violations as it deprives the represented party of proper representation. This can be room for appeal. In the US at least.
@elainejohnson8677
2 жыл бұрын
Keep up this good work and continue bringing this info to us!
@duzitickle3544
2 жыл бұрын
Just wanted to say that I found you through the jdah trial and found your perspective wonderful. You're like a liaison between the UK trial(+?) and US trial+ and I appreciate you for that. Ah will ultimately destroy Ah in ways only Ah can. She continues to show us what kind of person she is.
@MariaRodriguez-op8it
2 жыл бұрын
I like your views and opinions on these issues......keep them coming. Thank you for the video.
@surferdude4487
2 жыл бұрын
And yet EB made every attempt to include the UK finding in her closing arguments. She should be charged with contempt of court for her actions.
@debrarossi4235
2 жыл бұрын
I find this very interesting for my own personal reasons. I watched the whole trial and it didn't have anything to with celebrities. I like your content!
@robertstegall904
2 жыл бұрын
Now she has places all her assets in a trust! WTF?
@sparkyroots369
2 жыл бұрын
So they were blaming social media BEFORE the start of the Virginia trial?? I hadnt heard of her before this trial, I just like trials on yt. Grenfell Tower Inquiry is heartbreaking an the Rittenhouse trial was fascinating.
@SteveDorrans
2 жыл бұрын
I'm kinda disappointed that I haven't been blamed for her losing in court. Sometimes it seems like it's just me and Amber that had nothing to do with the outcome 😕
@Julia-uh4li
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Daniel, I for one, appreciate your insight with these unsealed court records. I look forward to all the new reveals to come & I'm learning a lot from you. Hope you and the Mrs have a good week ahead.
@paulaunger3061
2 жыл бұрын
I love these deep dives. The trial might have ended with the verdict, but all the issues thrown up by the trial will be relevant forever - hence why older cases which proved a relevant point are cited in legal documents for current cases. Each one is so illuminating - I know some people thing Amber's behaviour sealed her fate in this court, but it was by no means certain. And this video today, highlighting how far she wanted to go, really do illuminate how vindictive she is and how desperate to hurt her ex-husband she was. It's a rather terrifying insight into an essentially criminal mindset - and the more we know about this kind of person, the more we can protect ourselves against them when we encounter them in normal life (and this, sadly, is fairly inevitable it seems). Please keep up the good work.
@TAMPA234
2 жыл бұрын
If memory serves "discovery" in the U. S. Also includes the questioning of witnesses before an actual proceeding in court...
@davidjbiscoe957
2 жыл бұрын
Of course you should talk about this case because AH will just keep going
@heatherclayton-callaghan4270
2 жыл бұрын
PLEASE support this English Barrister by SIGNING his Johnny Depp PETITION to have the UK JUDGEMENT against JD brought back into the UK COURT system for an APPEAL . JUSTICE FOR JOHNNY is needed in the UK to genuinely clear his name after the evidenced made available in the US DEFAMATION court case of Depp v Heard , in which the JURY found 100% in FAVOUR of JOHNNY DEPP.
@micheledematteis2072
2 жыл бұрын
Done!
@d.jensen5153
2 жыл бұрын
I was fascinated by your presentation and discussion of these pretrial submissions! What fascinating perspective they offer in light of what followed!
@C3metalthingies
2 жыл бұрын
so according to Elaine, they are the same hahahaha. Reaching by far different articles different writers different years of publishing. Wow....
@SuperDrLisa
2 жыл бұрын
Please continue your explanations of legal issues. Very interesting.
Пікірлер: 884