Thanks Pat, love your work. I was busy typing " you missed coefficient of discharge" when I looked up at your video again and there its was :-)
@peasant8246
Жыл бұрын
This is a must see video for every aspiring engineer.
@ahmedmagdy3144
2 жыл бұрын
man you r awesome still can't believe you only have 1000 subscribers you are high tier KZitem man seep the hard work
@ProcesswithPat
2 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate it. I’ve gotten a few comments like that, but as long as some people are finding it useful and interesting then I’m achieving what I set out to do!
@NedumEze
10 ай бұрын
Superbly done. Superbly explained. Thanks Buddy.
@ayushsaxena7770
2 жыл бұрын
This is genius. Wish that such concept be taught at university. More videos please.
@istoriamidelatorre362
10 ай бұрын
excellent work!
@ianbelletti6241
Жыл бұрын
Its a blockage issue. You didn't debur the hole and any obstruction you leave affects the calculation. With those small holes a single bur has a large effect.
@SafeAndEffectiveTheySaid
Жыл бұрын
Nice video. We could see the cat trying to grab attention
@girishmhatre483
2 жыл бұрын
Interesting video, and completely refresh my mind. Sir I have one question that, if two tanks at different pressure and connected with one pipeline. And there is valve on the pipeline, as soon as we open the valve fluid will start flowing from high pressure to low pressure till it reaches the equilibrium, but how we can calculate the flow rate of the flowing fluid? As we don't know the velocity.
@ProcesswithPat
2 жыл бұрын
Hi there! Glad you found it interesting. You could only begin to start calculating that kind of thing if you had the dimensions of each tank, the initial levels, the pressure in the vapour space of the tanks, as well as the dimensions/arrangement of the line that interconnects them...
@girishmhatre483
2 жыл бұрын
@@ProcesswithPat thank you sir.
@3dprintwiz378
Жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/1Iuo1YNtiYqeaII This video shows a more accurate actual result compared to the computed one. I wonder if the die had something to do with the error on your experiment.
@SmashCrunch
11 ай бұрын
I think it's because the hole in that video is on the curved side of the bottle compared to the flat bottom of Pat's video. The hole in the side of the bottle effectively has two sides with rounded edges making the discharge coefficient closer to ~1.0 whereas Pat calculated ~0.61 for the hole on the flat bottom. So that guy's results are closer to his formula even though he left out the discharge coefficient.
Пікірлер: 15