Thanks Gents. I MUCH prefer 'look' of the Canon 5D4. - smoother, more cinematic, less camcorder look. I shoot both Canon and Panasonic.
@eddievolondo
5 жыл бұрын
'camcorder look' - exactly how id describe it. Ive spent a lot of time trying to work GH5 footage in post and was never happy when compared to canon.
@JhoelColombia
6 жыл бұрын
6k anamorphic, 4k 60 fps, 1980 200fps, no limit time to rec, 10 bits, Sensor-shift Image Stabilization, Articulated Screen, Electronic viewfinder , 6k photo mode...GH5.
@mikes_perspective6580
6 жыл бұрын
Plus it still takes great photos. Dual SD card. No over heating, long battery lasting. Whether proof!
@flyguy8787
6 жыл бұрын
The GH5 has unrivaled features for sure.. Does one buy things based on features or based on the end result? I’ve used both of these cameras and I absolutely love the GH5’s features. Can you get away with the GH5’s M43 image sensor? You can. a lucrative little wedding/music video videographer setup would be a GH5, a Mavic Pro, and a Crane 2 gimbal and you’d be totally set for not an overwhelming amount of money (respectively) However let’s be honest.... Canon footage in general just looks like a straight up movie. So I am the type of person that will always side with the end result. My clients don’t know what in body LUTs are nor do they know what 10 bit codecs are.... but they do know that on Canon they look marginally more cinematic and beautiful than on Panasonic.
@billybengi
5 жыл бұрын
True
@flyguy8787
5 жыл бұрын
losepoundsandinches a micro 4/3rds sensor with terrible skin tones looks more cinematic? Have you actually ever watched a movie?
@ariruishalme4403
3 жыл бұрын
@@flyguy8787 skin tones are great in gh5.. if that canon is better for u..
@amirleon996
3 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure why the title says VIDEO camera, and we end up grading the cameras on PHOTO ability. Is it just me? Maybe change the title guys. Either way FANTASTIC coverage guys I appreciate your video.
@vikvik9254
6 жыл бұрын
Auto Focus is not dependable as per GH5. Cinematographers do not use or depend on auto focus. It is time we forget about this with the GH5 and move on.
@eddievolondo
5 жыл бұрын
AF on GH5/s is fine if you stick it in shutter angle of 150d. I still prefer Canon 5d though. The filmic look just beats any of GH5 features sadly. I did really try with the GH5s but it just doesn't match a canons end result.
@sols9449
6 жыл бұрын
I actually liked he image quality on the canon way better. Was richer colors more pop.
@Stozubw
5 жыл бұрын
on the canon the picture is more interesting, voluminous, and the second dry
@ariruishalme4403
3 жыл бұрын
Over contrasty ... Didn't like it at all. Gh5 picture is flawlesss
@TelesphoreArt
5 жыл бұрын
You guys are a riot when played between .25-.50 playback speed. Nice vid chaps.
@worldtravelingtv1828
6 жыл бұрын
Most people shop within their budget and knowledge. Panasonic video cameras in 1980's cost from $2,500 to $7,500 up to $50,000 cameras for shooting movies . We bought two $2,500 plus extra equipment. Total $7.000 we could shoot a few movies for personal use. Now these days two canon or GH5 will shoot a better movie than the ones we bought in 1980's. For my personal use I want something that has fastest AF, best color, and shoot better at night.
@mrrandom5469
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I’ve been trying to decide what camera to buy for making videos. My sister is a photographer and bought the 5d mark iv and then she became a videographer and she loves it. And you guys just confirmed that it is great for videos. So thank you!!
@michaelchaplin866
5 жыл бұрын
Between the two tests your shots were very very different so the person using the music totally made it out that the mark 4 is way better but this has to do with the person holding it
@jonassubvert
6 жыл бұрын
Gh5 is actually great for still picture and superb for video. Turn down a camera for poor af when the comparison was about video is little lame. I love canon but sold my 5dsr and bought gh5, and I have not looked back
@jonassubvert
6 жыл бұрын
Gh5’s manual focus is super. And all real cinema lenses is manual anyway:)
@MrAndrewFitzy
6 жыл бұрын
it all depends on what your filming, if your doing alot of run and gun stuff on a gimbal or stedicam it might be a better choice to go with the camera that has better AF
@JarbasBosslerNaTela
5 жыл бұрын
Gh5 is much better for me too
@filmbob
5 жыл бұрын
I never use autofocus. I see how KZitemrs may need that.
@damiantodd3912
6 жыл бұрын
This review is painful to watch as a videographer. You're speaking from a photographers stand point.
@John-Shutterlyphotos
5 жыл бұрын
You are not kidding! But they did a video and did a good job, so I had to like the video. Next time just get to the point quicker, the video should have been done in 10 minutes not 16. Can't say I would do better, only saying from a viewers point of view.
@jennygw1883
6 жыл бұрын
Really interesting. Loved that first footage from the 5d4. I'd been planning ahead for a switch away from Canon, but not now.
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you - hopefully you found it helpful!
@MichaelGrubbEvolvedMinistry
6 жыл бұрын
I own both cameras, and there is no need to switch. Each camera is based upon a specific set of criteria. The 5D Mark IV rocks and so does the GH5. It just depends on what you need to do, that is all.
@jennygw1883
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your replies. I've gone with the 5D3 for now as I don't need the 4k just yet and I think I might go C100 if my video work increases.
@Primal-healing
6 жыл бұрын
can you match the 5d mark iv and the gh5 in camera color wise for interviews? they look similar in some videos however skin tones other than white white skin brings hesitation if i want to avoid color fixing in post.
@MichaelGrubbEvolvedMinistry
6 жыл бұрын
I am fortunate enough to own both cameras and I think the world of each of them. I wouldn't trade either of them for the world.
@raulyearwoodify
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video. You help me make up my mind.
@Parvizdov
6 жыл бұрын
appriciATE the effort, hope u guys blow up on subs
@alm8934
6 жыл бұрын
oh thank you so much!
@weigertj
6 жыл бұрын
Canon color science is the best!
@luckynever8208
6 жыл бұрын
not to mention the dual pixel af so much better than GH5 hunting focus
@giovannifiorentini8295
6 жыл бұрын
Somebody that does videography hardly ever uses autofocus. So it is not a big issue.
@MrAndrewFitzy
6 жыл бұрын
LMAO and what makes you think this? please explain? because i can see 99.9999% of the youtube video creators use auto focus but i geuss you will say they aren't doing any videography....
@FKfilmphotography
6 жыл бұрын
Because youtube video creators are not what you would class as working cinematographers or videographers who shoot for a living. Vlogging and making actual productions is somewhat different. Autofocus will never trump codecs, in camera stabalisation etc.
@Spanian
5 жыл бұрын
so one has better image.. the other better auto focus? well i guess you can do something about the focus but you cant the image...
@xylofilms386
6 жыл бұрын
This is Bull! Why have you shot on two different lenses!! Shooting without bokeh on the GH5 shots?! That’s not a fair comparison. 🙄
@JarbasBosslerNaTela
5 жыл бұрын
Channel Eighty8 gh5 is the best
@sookiemiller9017
4 жыл бұрын
I completely agree haha
@qrdaudio
3 жыл бұрын
IMHO Much people said that "cinematic feel" With fullframe camera, and comparing to small 43. But actually a movie used super35 sensor which is around APSC sensor. And when we look to any block buster movie, we rarely see very thin dof like in fullframe, I think is about decision from Director and DoP which lens to use, wether full frame, apsc, or 43 system that been used for production. And is not about bokeh, bokeh is related to distance between object and background, the problem with full frame is very thin dof, which is it can be problem, especially for commercial work. And for autofocus thing, except we choose camera for vlogging, we rarely use autofocus for serious video production
@nathandd8541
5 жыл бұрын
good job very nice review
@jecottrelltube
6 жыл бұрын
I like watching all the vloggers that have bought the GH5, their vids are a constant soup sammich of focus hunting.
@MrAndrewFitzy
6 жыл бұрын
thats why alot of them are switching back to canon or sony
@FidelTshivhasa
4 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or the GH5 keeps losing focus... but they say it's in track focus of the characters face? I🙄
@vinaykuriti6759
6 жыл бұрын
We know autofocus is an issue but film makers anyway use manual focus. Feeling like a biased review. I have tested both. Both have their pros and cons. Not helpful. Try to give balanced reviews.
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment - the autofocus was one part of the review, alongside the sensor, the colour science and everything else we discussed. I'm not sure how it can be biased either when both cameras were bought with our own money - we just drew our conclusions from using both and sharing with you guys!
@MichaelGrubbEvolvedMinistry
6 жыл бұрын
Would it have been more balanced if they stated that they like the GH5 better? I bet you would have thought so.
@realitytunnel
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks, this is interesting to me, as I've just decided to move back to Canon for video work. It's only when you look at specs on paper the GH5 is 'better'. In real life shooting, Canon's colour science and general image quality (not just sharpness) and their great Dual Pixel AF in video really make more of a difference for me. Lens choice is great and can be used on, e.g., a rented C200 if even more video quality is desired. Can I ask if you've tested the video AF on the Sigma 1.8 zooms, as you mentioned them? In theory they would be a great video lens for me along with my photo primes, but I hear that some Sigma lenses don't work well with DPAF in video mode on some Canon cameras...
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comments! We use our Sigma 18-35 1.8 almost exclusively on our Canon C200. Beautiful lens! If we need to use autofocus for whatever reason, we've not noticed at any point anything detrimental with the lens. We've also used it on the 5dMKIV and again, never experienced anything to date that would make us think there was an issue with that lens coupled with Canon's DPAF.
@Iglesiasphotography
5 жыл бұрын
Pros don’t use auto focus...
@TotallyExposed
5 жыл бұрын
They also don't use GH5's or 5D MKIV's :)
@ixoratv9654
Ай бұрын
Which camera do they use? I'm looking to buy camera for filmmaking. @@TotallyExposed
@Brianuyahoo
6 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised that you didn't go into using the cameras and talking about "mirrorless" vs "live view" between the two cameras. Which was easier?
@rcraju9
5 жыл бұрын
Which is better canon 5d mark iii or mark iv
@tcibeatrecords4707
3 жыл бұрын
Using a speed booster for this test makes this comparison useless....
@vazvideo
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review guys, I actually watched the whole thing, but seriously you cannot give a fair review on the overall performance of cameras used for video, by taking them out for 20 min. in one outdoor setting, and give conclusions on which is best. That's like going on a blind date with a woman you consider attractive, and after :10 seconds making a decision on whether you'll marry her or not. "Best camera for video?" I can appreciate your thoughts, but I learned in Speech 101 not to "pontificate", which is what seems to be all over YT about which DSLR camera is best for video. I own 8 cameras as a pro, (all have paid for themselves) and they all have their uses for whatever environment I'm shooting in, and what look the client is looking for. I wouldn't wear a tux to work out at the gym, nor would I try to run and gun with a GH5 and complain about the auto-focus..lol.. Anyway, thanks for your thoughts, I hope for the best for your business.
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Hi Jason, thanks for the comment! As we said in the video we bought the GH5 as soon as it was released, and as such we had the opportunity to use it on a variety of projects and videos, as well as the Canon 5D4. We'd agree that just taking it out for a morning and judging it on that alone wouldn't be very good! Our opinions were formed after using both cameras on a number of projects and seeing which ended up being the best fit for us.
@vazvideo
6 жыл бұрын
You might want to go back and actually listen to what you said... :08 "We decided to go out today". 2:42 "What you saw there, is we decided to go out and get a few test shots." I won't argue with you guys, have a great day.
@Avedisdrummer09
6 жыл бұрын
I'm assuming you guys are primarily photographers, otherwise there is no excuse for this interpretation...The GH5 buries the 5Div in every regard. Autofocus is almost a non-issue for anyone using these cameras primarily for video. Canon has a terrible 4K codec. Then you try to say a Full Frame sensor has more lens options than a micro 4/3 lol. That's absurd, almost any lens will cover the GH5 whereas the 5D requires full frame. This video is supposed to be for VIDEO and you're reviewing it like event photographers. On top of that you can grab two GH5s for only around 200 dollars more than one 5Div. Plus rolling shutter, video assists, Logorithnic 4k 10 bit color space...I think you guys should maybe reevaluate your aptness to review video gear...
@MichaelGrubbEvolvedMinistry
6 жыл бұрын
No, actually the GH5 does not bury the 5D in every regard. I own both cameras (5D Mark iV, the Gh5 as well as the GH4) They are all fantastic cameras and it simply depends on what you intend to use each of these for. Now that I own all of them, I find the war between each faction to be ridiculous because these cameras actually do quite well to compliment one another.
@TheOnlyTruthJC
6 жыл бұрын
I agree with you, now will you be my rich uncle?
@flyguy8787
6 жыл бұрын
If you want a camera that has amazing features get the GH5, if you want a camera with no features but LOOKS like a movie then get the Canon. The features of the GH5 are unrivaled... however your audience doesn’t see the scopes and anamorphic desqueeze that you had. They see the footage and Canon footage looks like a movie... period.
@jennygw1883
6 жыл бұрын
How about 5D4 vs 5D3 Magic Lsntern 4K RAW? Or even 3.5k 10 bit continuous?
@billybengi
5 жыл бұрын
Why would you do a comparison video of GH5 without Having it?
@TotallyExposed
5 жыл бұрын
We did own the camera, just sold it!
@g33-roy95
5 жыл бұрын
someone please tell me the name of the artist & the name of the track
@thomassandfield835
6 жыл бұрын
Make more reviews! ... one every month is too less, at least try 3-4 videos pr month .. keep up the good work
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you Thomas! We have every intention of upping our production schedule in 2018. Keep em peeled!
@kaziheron267
5 жыл бұрын
which camera is used in this video in your studio ?
@TotallyExposed
5 жыл бұрын
Canon C200
@MrAndrewFitzy
6 жыл бұрын
i find it funny that most of the comments are people saying "real videographers don't use auto focus" they are probably the same ones who said who needs digital when we have film or mirrorless cameras won't compare to DSLRs everyone has different needs in a video camera for youtube based videos or run and gun style videos auto focus is key and if its out of focus your wasting your time or if you have the extra time to color correct videos and really spend the time on it then yeah the GH5 maybe a better choice but if your creating a bunch of content and have a short deadline the canon might be a better choice. a camera is a tool to create something. most features in cameras these days people dont even use. but thats just my opinion who am i right? Oh and i am a canon shooter ive tried a bunch of different cameras but go back to canon for ease of use.
@galesal1109
6 жыл бұрын
dude, the film industry doesnt use AF. sorry but its true. been in the industry for 8 years.
@MrAndrewFitzy
6 жыл бұрын
the film industry is very wide and to say that people haven't used AF is dumb, on movie sets yes they dont use AF but they aren't going to use a GH5 ether so its kinda a dumb argument. as i said i know a bunch of people that use AF during run and gun situation or on low budget films when they need to.
@MrAndrewFitzy
6 жыл бұрын
i geuss all the youtube FILM MAKERS switching back from the GH5 to canon cameras doesn't have to do with AF or color... but are you gonna make the argument that they aren't film makers?
@galesal1109
6 жыл бұрын
MrAndrewFitzy but we are talking about real professionals. Not inspiring film makers. And plenty of people out here in Hollywood use cameras other then c300 or the red Camera and still only use Manual focus.
@galesal1109
6 жыл бұрын
comparing youtubers with film industry professional is laughable. this camera was made for indie movie/film makers in mind and not for vloggers.
@ramymelhem
4 жыл бұрын
A couple of canon fanboys providing their 'unbiased' opinions.
@RakeshRai
5 жыл бұрын
PRICE GH5 5DIV ?
@seyekehinde7078
5 жыл бұрын
@ 3:20 HAHAHAHHAHAHAA
@BethequeenWorld133
4 жыл бұрын
nice video sir
@chrismorenomccarthy8487
6 жыл бұрын
Also de cinematography at the beginning for the gh5 was a bit shit.
@luckynever8208
6 жыл бұрын
which camera did you use to shoot this video with?
@luckynever8208
6 жыл бұрын
oh its C200, no wonder the color look so perfect. with GH5 it is almost impossible to have this good of color
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Indeed, all the piece to cam stuff and some of the b-roll of the cams themselves was shot on the C200
@strongstyle117
6 жыл бұрын
Literally everyone on KZitem makes a big deal about auto focus... If you not vlogging then you shouldn't be using auto focus... Period.. if you any kinda professional then you use manual..
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
MikeLewis Can’t argue but if you’re kinda professional you wouldn’t be using either of these cameras in the first place
@JarbasBosslerNaTela
5 жыл бұрын
Gh5 for me was the best
@zeus9931
6 жыл бұрын
Quite simply, canon fans behave like i phone fans, believe even today would be the best ... but at least as far as the camera is concerned, the gh5 is definitely the better choice ...
@Benjamooon
6 жыл бұрын
I bet they both have iPhones!
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment. We agreed the GH5 is a very good camera, especially for the price, however the auto-focus issues along with the fact most of our gear/lenses are Canon - the 5D Mkiv was the clear winner for us.
@zeus9931
6 жыл бұрын
Yes, I think the autofocus may be a problem, but times a little angry only for people who always work in strong sunshine with Aperture 1.4, which I personally consider stupid, otherwise the autofocus is just not needed, which But I just as the big problem with the Canon see, SLR = constantly a dirty sensor ...
@giovannifiorentini8295
6 жыл бұрын
Agree. I jumped ship from Canon to Panasonic. I can live with not having good auto focus.
@MichaelGrubbEvolvedMinistry
6 жыл бұрын
First and foremost, I own an Iphone X, the GH5, the Gh4, the gopro hero 6, the gopro hero 5 session, the DJI mavic Pro, 360fly 4K, a Ricoh KR-5 Super II, and the Canon 5D Mark IV. This whole brand war going on between Pansonic users vs Canon is absolutely childish and downright retarded. All of these brands are excellent and, if you know how to use them, they all work well to compliment one another. I'm not sure why GH5 users MUST attempt to constantly validate their purchases by downing the purchases of others. I watch it happen all day long on the Facebook groups. If you're happy that you purchased a GH5, then simply enjoy the camera. I love both of my Panasonics, but, I feel absolutely zero need to constantly validate my choice of purchase by dogging any of the other amazing brands on the market. Until you really work with a Canon, you simply don't understand why hardcore users of Canon remain with them. Personally I am blown away by all of the strides that these manufacturers have made, and if not for Canon's excellence, other manufacturers would not be where they are now. The same thing can be said for IPhone. They defined the smartphone revolution. So, it doesn't matter whether you have a phone that is somehow "better," those options would not exist until Apple created the template that everyone else out there is following to the "T." Brand loyalty is absolutely ridiculous. Get what you need, shoot with it, and create good art. Later...
@Frame_IT
6 жыл бұрын
yo you guys should have more subscribers wtf love ur vid
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you, glad you liked it
@Frame_IT
6 жыл бұрын
Totally Exposed what you guys think of the sony a 7 r iii?
@CinesimMedia
6 жыл бұрын
You guys deserve more subscribers!
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Ha, thanks! Would be nice 😊
@joshmvfx
6 жыл бұрын
The motion looks like shite on the Canon.
@mangoboy4reel
5 жыл бұрын
I think these men need glasses.
@JWS1968
6 жыл бұрын
So basically, in terms of video a GH5 BUT with the Canons Auto Focus would be pretty much unbeatable. For the record as nice as the 5 Axis IBIS is in the GH5 and the great 4K VLog footage it's a complete waste if it's out of focus or if you're on a job and constantly worrying if your footage is going to be usable when you get home. For me as a single shooter doing it all myself on the day and with lots of moving subjects and dynamic camera movement, its got to be the Canon for the Dual Pixel Auto Focus.
@3Torts
4 жыл бұрын
Haters...chill
@kris.monroe
6 жыл бұрын
Farr too much time was wasted talking about the AF (which is a moot point in any professional video project/job). Otherwise awesome comparison!
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment! I wouldn’t say it was a moot point in most documentary or gimbal/drone work though.
@chandlercomputers
6 жыл бұрын
Geezer on the left can't get a word in edgeways xD
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
He’s not got much useful to say anyway 🙈
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
James usually has enough hot air blowing out for the pair of us :)
@giovannifiorentini8295
6 жыл бұрын
Bias review. The Canon is great at photos and video but the Panasonic is great at photo and exceptional for video. Which means the Panasonic is superior.
@TotallyExposed
6 жыл бұрын
Not biased I'm afraid - we have no affiliation with Canon nor Panasonic and both cameras were purchased with our own money. We purchased the GH5 expecting it to kill the video game but for us, it just really didn't, for reasons mentioned. And no, not just the Dual Pixel AF - the colour science is superior, the aesthetic of the larger sensor is better. But we've been over this already :)
@chrisw443
6 жыл бұрын
So you want a crappier video camera so you can use auto focus. because you can put literately any lens on the gh5. So... Yeah. but hey whatever works for you
@giovannifiorentini8295
6 жыл бұрын
I agree. Many videographers hardly ever use auto-focus anyways. Manual is our best friend. So I would rather have an exceptional video camera and manually focus it myself as I always do anyways instead of getting inferior video quality and use autofocus. Makes no sense to me. But, it's as you said, whatever works for you. Hahaha
@3rdeyemedia854
6 жыл бұрын
I think you guys are sounding a little old fashioned. The Canon 5D Mark IV comes with excellent WIFI auto-focus. I can see and control the focus from my IPAD retina in almost 4k clarity with no lag when on WIFI (wireless). For any single person shooters this is very handy or if you have the camera on jib or a boom can remotely control focus at over 100ft. But with that the focus is actually very good. All you have to do is touch on the screen where you want the camera to pull focus and it goes there fast or slow depending on what you select. Absolutely Marvelous....
@Filmmaker809
5 жыл бұрын
Who cares about the auto focus, Canon is losing the race. Filmmakers don't use auto focus. They just don't get it. Canon have lost their focus. No pun intended.
@TotallyExposed
5 жыл бұрын
Their colour science and image quality is ace, but yeah, we’d agree they need to step up to offer more broadcast offerings. Even on our C200, getting 10 bit 422 4K requires an abnormal workflow. Come on Canon!
Пікірлер: 124