The gun does not shoot to the left, you shoot to the left.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Yep. I need to work on my phrasing I guess, because that’s what I meant. I shoot left with that particular gun.
@marklopez-cdhs4994
Жыл бұрын
I have carried first generation 856 for years put a wolf spring kit in and it is smooth as butter it has never failed me and is my EDC.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! I am considering putting the Apex Spring Kit in mine. Since it’s a used gun, there’s no telling the condition the current springs are in.
@puggins1
Жыл бұрын
I own two taurus's, an M85 & 856. I also own a S&W 637. all 3 are dependable PDW's. my S&W 637 is my fave.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! The 637 is definitely more comparable to the 856, but unfortunately I don’t have one so I used the 642.
@bracht6123
Жыл бұрын
I recently bought a 856. The thing that made me choose Taurus with exposed hammer was that people always talk how good S&W service is, so i thought service would probably be needed with 642. I'm going to find out first hand if the Taurus holds up. Thanks for video. 👍
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@cdragracer
Жыл бұрын
I've had the 856UL for quite some time. The main purpose for me is a trail gun when I go hiking. Carry three snake shot and three 158 HP, in case I come across something that needs a little more power. I carry it IWB and really do not know it's there while hiking. I live in the south and not concerned with bears. Also, carry a speed loader with regular loads just in case.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! It would make a good snake gun on the trail. I hadn’t thought of that.
@francisgarner1751
Жыл бұрын
I just picked up the taurus 856 3" barrel and I'm waiting for the new taurus 605defender with the cerakote finish Altamont wood grips to come into my Dealer!! The best is the taurus revoler!!!👍🏿👍🏿
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Nice. I’ve been debating the 3” model. Looks good, especially with the VZ grips on it, night sight, and there’s a double action only model. But I also want to check out the new Executive model if I can find one.
@leew9oy
Жыл бұрын
You had 4 rounds fly out of the 642, where as only 1 of the 856 rounds was a flier. Your analysis that you are a better shot with the 642 is riddiculous. The 642 has 5 rounds available and you miss nearly 20% of the time, whereas the 856 has 6 rounds and you missed only 4% of the time. The 856 in your hands is far more deadly.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Those are valid arguments if you look at individual rounds. However, I was looking at the overall grouping. The 856 grouping was much larger; the rounds were spread further apart. That translates to a consistency issue. Whereas the 642 had a much tighter group, the 4 fliers being outliers. That’s the whole point of shooting a group rather than just one round. In other words, the 856 consistently hit all over the place. The 642 consistently hit in the same place.
@mattjean2652
Ай бұрын
@@AffordableArmory ...my opinion. Ultralight has more of a kick. That could have affected your accuracy.
@jtns2845
Жыл бұрын
i have a taurus 85 and 856, and a s&w 37 and 642. the only attribute of the t856 that i dislike is the difficulty in changing its pinned grip. a screwed grip is way preferable.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! I haven’t tried changing the grips on my 856, but good to know.
@myronbrand
Жыл бұрын
I really like the older 642 grips. The texture is aggressive. Keeping a good grip. The pinky tucks in very well. Like it was a bigger grip. I haven't gotten to hold the newer style Taurus grip.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@bobg1685
2 жыл бұрын
I have both of these. I carried the 642 for a while, and then got a T856, and decided I liked shooting the 856 more than the 642. The 642 was slightly easier to conceal, but not by much, really. I liked that sixth round in the Taurus, and having a hammer vs not having one was no big deal. I did change out the stock grips for laser grips on the 856, so concealment required more thought, but it's still good, and the extra real estate on the grips made handling the recoil easier. FYI, the S&W also has laser grips, but it seems that the Taurus grips feel better. Some hate on Taurus quality, but I have no complaints. Both good guns, but I prefer the Taurus for now.
@AffordableArmory
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Good points. I neglected to mention the 6th round makes the cylinder a little wider. But as you mentioned, not by much. I’ve never been a fan of laser grips, but that’s definitely an option.
@anangryranger
Жыл бұрын
Had, (key word: HAD) a 642 but it was pitiful. Did a complete action job on it, and it was a great improvement, at least in the action department. But it still sprayed bullets everywhere. Soon traded it for a used S&W Mod 10-14 4". It eats the X and 10 ring all day long. Last week I bought a new Taurus 856UL 38Spl with the Amriglow tritium front sight in 3". The Taurus 856UL 3" shoots nearly as well as the M10. Impressive. So I'm carrying the 856 3". Over the past 62 years I've been shooting, I have a hard and fast rule. I will not own any weapon that I cannot shoot well. Period. That's why there's no Tupperware pistols in my safe. The only autoloader there is a 1911A1 in 45ACP.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
@@anangryranger I’d agree that snubbed are more difficult to shoot. I have a Smith & Wesson Model 65 that, like your Model 10, I can shoot the x out of the target with, no problem. It also has larger grips than the J-frame size guns, and it has a 4” barrel.
@llosttprophett
Жыл бұрын
Where did you buy the laser grips for the Taurus 856?
@bobg1685
Жыл бұрын
@@llosttprophett I got the grips from the Taurus website. They're from Viridian, but they have the Taurus logo on them. I don't care for the size of the laser adjustment screws (too small) but once it's tuned you're good. I have mine ranged out to about ten yards, I think. Some people complain they can't keep zero, but I've been good, so far.
@jeffhastings3952
Жыл бұрын
I went with the Taurus 856 personally. I like that it's 6 rounds and single and double action. The factory grip is comfortable also.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! I hope you like it.
@BeingWellRegulated
3 ай бұрын
Snubbies are pretty difficult to master. But they absolutely are capable of very respectable accuracy.
@AffordableArmory
3 ай бұрын
@@BeingWellRegulated Thanks for watching! I agree.
@jeffpaul8260
Жыл бұрын
i have the 856 and just bought a 3 inch 856. i also have a 605 but typically carry the 856 instead.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Nice. Thanks for watching!
@glenmo1
Жыл бұрын
I own both a 642 centennial airweight and a 11 oz titanium cylinder Smith 342 air light neither of these guns have any key holeling . Elongated holes on the paper.. I would try different ammo I also get fantastic groups with both my 642 and 342 up to 30-35 ft I can get good shots also at 50 ft if I take my time I would change and try different ammo I have never got any rounds key holding with these guns
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! I’m definitely going to do an update video.
@jeff-fe9zl
Жыл бұрын
I've had a S&W 442 for about 10 years or so (the 442 is black vs. the 642 "stainless" look). In autos, I like capacity, and I feel more comfortable with a 6 shot revolver over a 5 shot revolver so four years ago I "replaced it" with a Taurus 856UL. The 856 is noticeably wider in the cylinder, and enough so that in the role I intend my lightweight aluminum snubs (pocket or ankle carry as either a deep concealment gun or a BUG) the 442 is better. I tried it for a few months, but I now only use it IWB. So, I'll likely replace it with the steel version, IWB I find a steel framed snub is more than light enough, and the extra weight makes for faster follow up shots and more pleasant range practice (which means more range practice). As for quality, I have been happy with my 856 (and my older 85CH). The trigger on my 856 is a bit heavier than I'd like, though it does smooth out a bit with use. I've shot hundreds of rounds through it, and thousands of dry fires and while better than when new, it is still heavy. When I replace it with the 856CH (and also with the 3" 856 Defender I'm likely replacing my 3" Colt King Cobra with), I will be investing in a lighter weight Wolff spring kit.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! I agree about the 856 being wider and defeating the purpose as a pocket/ankle gun. Solid points there.
@bobjohnson1633
Жыл бұрын
856 is a better full time carry. The Smith is better for deep cover or tertiary. I don't have any small tauruses, and all my 5-6 shot guns are part time. I'm usually carrying a L or N frame Smith. Too big for most people.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@oldcop18
Жыл бұрын
You put a lot of stock in a gun’s ability to shoot a tight group. I’ve been in a gunfight and the only important thing is to get hits. You’ll be panic shooting and your adversary will be moving and hiding behind stuff while shooting back at you. Some of your rounds will go into what he/she is hiding behind. Good comparison, seems like a draw to me.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@MisterTengu
2 жыл бұрын
I don't remember when or why I bought my 642, but I still like it. I did choose it over the Ruger sp101
@AffordableArmory
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! It’s definitely still a great gun.
@CoreyCJordan
Жыл бұрын
I own a 642 and a 3" 856. When I carry a snubby revolver, I carry an aluminum frame 16oz (loaded) Charter Arms 5 shot Undercover. Why? I like the low weight of the 642, but wanted the option of single action shooting. My Undercover has a better DA trigger than the S&W or 856. It's SA trigger is outstanding. It's been reliable and easy to shoot even with the short grip option. I like the strength of the solid frame. It's +P rated as well. All are excellent revolvers. However, the Charter Arms alloy frame Undercover better suits my wants and needs.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! I haven’t tried a Charter Arms.
@AK-ky3ou
Жыл бұрын
The 637 is the da sa version of the 642
@Gieszkanne
25 күн бұрын
A "hammerless" revolver wouldnt fire. I have read a few comments that the 642/442 wear out if you shoot it a lot and are not repairable.That is a good reason not to buy a used one! The newer 856 have a pinned exchangable front sight. The extra round is also good. I think the 856 offer more.
@AffordableArmory
25 күн бұрын
@@Gieszkanne Thanks for watching!
@RidersRange
2 жыл бұрын
Nice detailed comparison. Either will work just fine for its intended purpose - bad breath distance defense. If the budget is tight, look for a Taurus. They have come a long way in quality, though their QC does seem to be a little spotty. For quality and overall "shootability", the nod goes to Smith. And self defense is ONLY a double-action affair, so single-action capability is a non-issue. Also, I just scrolled through all 608 Taurus 856 on Gunbroker, and not a purple one to be found.
@AffordableArmory
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! I agree with you on the double action point. Didn’t know the purple ones (I think it’s technically violet) were so rare. Did they have any of the other colors?
@AK-ky3ou
Жыл бұрын
They only made the colored ones the first year or 2.
@sammyprestwood3182
Жыл бұрын
Shoot ability is in the shooter own the Taurus ultra light in Matt stainless and that gun's amazingly accurate I can hit a 5 inch plate at 10 yards with no problem thanks for your video I never cared for the hammerless revolvers but that's just me
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@surfandstreamfisher5749
9 ай бұрын
i owned a S&W 642. bought it for a pocket carry gun. after shooting over 500 rounds thru it i was never happy with the accuracy i was able to get. traded it in for a Kahr CM9
@AffordableArmory
9 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! They’re not easy to shoot, that’s for sure.
@G23reviews
2 жыл бұрын
I was going to buy a S&W revolver new and the cylinder kept locking up on the forcing cone and the crane was rubbing on the frame. I don't know what happened to the quality control with some companies anymore
@AffordableArmory
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Interesting. I haven’t heard of any qc issues with Smith and Wesson.
@509bunnyhaven
8 ай бұрын
love Smith & Wesson, great guns with an incredible reputation for durability, serviceability and excellent finishes but I think Im with you on this, that extra round, the quality of the stock grips and unbeatable price makes it a clear winner in my books. great review!
@AffordableArmory
8 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@jessicagrecco5813
11 ай бұрын
I own the 856 Taurus ul and it’s a fantastic fantastic revolver it gets the job done indeed
@AffordableArmory
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@jessicagrecco5813
11 ай бұрын
@@AffordableArmory I should be thanking you for the unbelievable support and knowledge you have given me indeed
@AffordableArmory
11 ай бұрын
@@jessicagrecco5813 😊 That made my day.
@JAE8404
Жыл бұрын
642 is perfect for a back-up ankle holster firearm or pocket carry.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@sammyprestwood3182
Жыл бұрын
The trigger pull on that Taurus in single action is probably about two or three pounds so it would absolutely beat the Smith & Wesson hands down if you check it that way it doesn't matter how heavy the trigger pull on a revolver is as long as the action and the trigger pull is smooth
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Agreed, but since the Smith is double action only, I didn’t want to unfairly compare it that way.
@gregb6469
9 ай бұрын
About the trigger pull difference, could the fact that the S&W is having to move a smaller cylinder than the Taurus when in DA mode make a difference in how heavy the trigger pull is?
@AffordableArmory
9 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! It could be. I’ve also had people comment on how I measured it. I’m no expert in that regard. It’s just a tool to gather data.
@lgwappo
Жыл бұрын
Based on my experience renting a 642 I'd take the Taurus. Trigger was gritty & felt about 14 pounds.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@thepunisherofchess7044
Жыл бұрын
Dude don’t blame the gun for the accuracy. It’s all on you. Practice using revolvers.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Well if the shots were all over the place, yes. But they weren’t. They were consistent.
@AK-ky3ou
Жыл бұрын
The 856 is great, it is quite a bit bigger and harder to conceal.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@dannysmith6035
Жыл бұрын
More likely used S&W will cost more then a new taurus. my Taurus 856 wins!
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! The possibly, but in this case the Smith and Wesson was cheaper.
@montv291
Ай бұрын
I bought a vedder holster. It came very loosely fit. I messaged their customer service twice. Never got a response. Won't buy again.
@AffordableArmory
Ай бұрын
@@montv291 Thanks for watching! Sorry to hear that. I haven’t heard of having that issue before.
@georgeveneziano2754
11 ай бұрын
The 642 has had spring wrk done they are about 11 to 12 lbs trigger pull
@AffordableArmory
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! Or it’s a well broken in used gun that I got a good deal on and possibly needs the springs replaced.
@georgeveneziano2754
11 ай бұрын
There. Perfect now leave well enough alone
@gregb6469
9 ай бұрын
Buying a used revolver is taking a risk, so anyone doing so needs to know how to inspect a revolver for function, damage, etc. There is a reason a used gun is available at the gun store or pawn shop, and sometimes the reason is that the gun is junk.
@AffordableArmory
9 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! Very true.
@mrdato116
11 ай бұрын
Taurus looks way hetter in my opinion 💪
@AffordableArmory
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@michaelschaffer9165
Жыл бұрын
Vedder doesn't make a holster for the Taurus 856. Wish they would.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Me too!
@stevep6318
8 ай бұрын
You didn't mention that the Smith has that very stupid (and ugly) exposed ejector rod, which could bend the rod and make the gun unusable if it was hit in the wrong place hard enough. The 856's rod is covered as it should be.
@AffordableArmory
8 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@thewarden9454
Жыл бұрын
Best part is the 856 front sights aren't canted like all the newer j frames I have lol
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@Beanmachine9198
5 ай бұрын
Imma go with the 642, but I’m biased, I have one😎
@AffordableArmory
5 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! Not a bad choice.
@echosierra9990
Жыл бұрын
We’re you shooting +P in the shooting portion? That looked like a lot of recoil.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! No, it’s standard. I’m going to get some revolver training later this year to find out more about shooting these little snubbies. I don’t have that issue with larger revolvers.
@allensharp6876
5 ай бұрын
You have a purple gun. Turn in your Man Card immediately!
@AffordableArmory
5 ай бұрын
😂🤣😂 Thanks for watching!
@gregb6469
9 ай бұрын
On the website of my favorite gun store both guns are available. The S&W will set you back by about $180 more than the Taurus.
@AffordableArmory
9 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! Yes, generally the Smith & Wesson will be more expensive.
@rbm6184
Жыл бұрын
Well I do like Smiths but not a double action only with no single action for taking more precise longer shots and I really don't like the safety lock on the 642. Whether a close range revolver or not I still want that single action ability to make a better shot. So my pick is the 856 but I got the three inch Defender model all stainless in matte black. Conceals the same just with an extra inch of barrel for longer sight radius, Tritium day/night front sight, and better muzzle velocity and energy. A little heavier than the UL also but better for recoil and more durable than the aluminum frame. Mine has Hogue grips that are bigger but again better for recoil. A standard white dot front sight and the standard Taurus small grips came with it extra. The extra sixth round is not so important to me even if it was a five shot like a model 85 or the 642 that would be fine. My 856 is +P dedicated and that is unusual since most are just rated for +P. Triggers are not as good on Taurus revolvers but they do wear in with use. Thanks for sharing. On quality control a gun no matter the brand whether new or used should be inspected before buying so there are no defects or damage but Smith lately has had some stinkers from the videos I have been seeing. Taurus can also have some stinkers so bottom line is check the gun over before buying no matter which one. I have been hearing the same about poor Smith customer service lately on videos and folks talk about bad Taurus customer service but my personal experience with Taurus customer service has been good. But my experience was not about the 856 but a lost part on another gun that was taken care of under warranty.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! The 856 Defender is definitely a better shooter because of the longer barrel (increased sight radius and better ballistics) and the bigger grips (more to hold onto = better control of recoil). I would carry that gun as a primary IWB and carry one of the two guns in this video as a backup or deep concealment (pocket, jacket, ankle, etc.). As to customer service, Taurus has improved over the years. Some people probably still have bad impressions from years past, but they’ve had a new president for the past few years and he’s made changing their reputation a priority. Smith & Wesson on the other hand, I’m not sure what their excuse is.
@bobjohnson1633
Жыл бұрын
You need to practice your double action more. Except for extreme precision, SA shouldn't be much better at all with proper technique. Headshots at 25 yards should be fairly accurate in DA.
@ghostwalker152
Жыл бұрын
With all the differences and variables between these two pistols, don't you think it's a bit silly comparing them.
@ghostwalker152
Жыл бұрын
Apples 🍎 and 🍊 oranges
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
@@ghostwalker152 Thanks for watching! Not really. They’re both readily available, easily concealable snubnose revolvers in the same caliber. And they’re both very popular guns. Comparing these two guns is no different than comparing a Glock 19 to a Sig Sauer P320. Or a Sig Sauer P365XL to a Springfield Armory Hellcat Pro. It’s a logical (and even necessary) comparison. Now if I said Glock 19 or Smith & Wesson J-Frame, THAT would be apples and oranges.
@AK-ky3ou
Жыл бұрын
What ammo were you using, I’ve never experienced keyholing from a j frame smith.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! If I remember right, it was Magtec 158 gr.
@lintlicker4178
8 ай бұрын
I love my 637 , I have two Smiths and a Taurus, Smith is definitely a better gun and a better trigger, but you pay for it
@AffordableArmory
8 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@mattjean2652
Ай бұрын
6 rounds or 5 rounds ...hmmm...not hard to choose.
@AffordableArmory
Ай бұрын
@@mattjean2652 Thanks for watching! Well if you’re only choosing based on capacity, sure.
@mattjean2652
Ай бұрын
@@AffordableArmory Not only on capacity. Everything else is so close, that's the tie breaker in my book.
@wooddawg4868
11 ай бұрын
Taurus kicked but on the 856 but those air weight guns are not a smart option. Taurus also has model 605 in 357 in 6 shot. I say stay with stainless steel versions or black alloy steel.
@AffordableArmory
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@gregb6469
9 ай бұрын
Why is the Ultra Light not a smart option? Being lighter they are easier to carry.
@AffordableArmory
9 ай бұрын
@@gregb6469 Ultralight/Airweight (Smith & Wesson) models are more difficult to shoot because they are lighter weight, and they tend to have more felt recoil. An all-steel version of the same size gun will have less felt recoil. That being said, if you practice with it and become comfortable and proficient with it, it can work well. But you should do that with any gun you choose to carry.
@idaho1959kkidd
Жыл бұрын
The Taurus 856 has a heavy trigger so take it to a gunsmith and smooth up the action
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! I may do that, but I prefer to get used to the gun first.
@kevinrichardson8859
Жыл бұрын
What ammo were you firing?
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Mag tech 158gr.
@Azobassify
10 ай бұрын
I have one of each...
@AffordableArmory
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! Me too.
@Azobassify
10 ай бұрын
I did ended up putting the Hogue Monogrip on the 642. It made a world of difference in shooting it comfortably. I hated shooting that gun with the original grips on it. No place for the pinky and the metal backstrap is against your hand. The Monogrip fixed all that, like a new gun, imho. The 856UL's stock grips were fine out of the box and it has that extra round. Both great guns...@@AffordableArmory
@kc0lif
Жыл бұрын
i like 340 pd. 38 +p+.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! That’s a lightweight gun with a lot of recoil. But to each his own.
@sammyprestwood3182
Жыл бұрын
Charter arms is manufacturing revolvers in different colors now but I don't believe the charter arms revolvers are as close to being as good as a Taurus they just don't look that reliable
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! No, the Charter Arms guns are not really in the same category as these.
@kylewood8327
Жыл бұрын
6 shots over 5 shots any day
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@bruceliggett8036
Жыл бұрын
The Smith is light years ahead of ANY Taurus product
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@bobjohnson1633
Жыл бұрын
The 642 really doesn't compare with a raging bull.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
@@bobjohnson1633 Nope. Those guns would definitely be in different categories.
@sparky_-mf2cs
Жыл бұрын
Taurus is junk save for a smith
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Based on what?
@sparky_-mf2cs
Жыл бұрын
@@AffordableArmory based on my biased opinion 😂 ( taurus is not junk) i just prefer a smith
@filoIII
Жыл бұрын
It's "SPURless." NOT "hammerless." Come on, bro.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! What do you call a Colt 1903 Pocket Hammerless then? It’s literally in the name and both guns do have a hammer. Come on, bro. 😂
@filoIII
Жыл бұрын
@@AffordableArmory It was misleading then for marketing purposes, but today, it's said out of ignorance.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
@@filoIII I suppose you probably freak out when someone calls it a .45 automatic then too?
@filoIII
Жыл бұрын
@@AffordableArmory The cartridge?
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
@@filoIII The gun.
@OGSERB
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. You really tipped me to not want either of these. Appreciated.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
😂 Thanks for watching! 🤷🏻♂️
@jesse-45cal-WCM
11 ай бұрын
The taurus would be my choice. One thought on the trigger pull test. Do you think the table was binding the rotation of the cylinder? May have added the wieght to the pull. Great video, you cant beat a snubby.
@AffordableArmory
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! Someone else mentioned the cylinder rotation factor as well. It would be interesting to test it again, maybe in a vise or something.
@frankbutta9344
Жыл бұрын
I paid $289 each for two 642 revolvers right before gunpocalypse happened. Online of course.
@AffordableArmory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! That’s a great deal. Lucky you!
@frankbutta9344
Жыл бұрын
@@AffordableArmory My FFL thought they were used when he saw the invoice!
Пікірлер: 153