pretty impressive firepower for an airborne vehicle
@northernstar3960
Жыл бұрын
No other airborne vehicle have 100 mm cannon with ATGM capability + 30 mm autocannon and 7,62 coaxial machine gun. What this vehicle needs is additional ERA armor pack and grills. And it's ready to fight.
@Veldtian1
Жыл бұрын
@@northernstar3960 what it really needs is a polyurea/boron carbide tile/uhmpe laminate cloak.
@JeanLucCaptain
Жыл бұрын
@@northernstar3960 that is the turret from the BMP-3. though i would imagine it has been modified to shave as much weight as possible.
@jonny2954
4 ай бұрын
As usual with Soviet/Russian vehicles. Lots of dakka but extremely handicapped by bad optronics, fire control and armor protection.
@alexnderrrthewoke4479
3 ай бұрын
@@jonny2954are you on coke?
@herohero-fw1vc
Жыл бұрын
Very impressive design & firepower for a small vehicle......
@johaneslerius9943
Жыл бұрын
I love it 😍😍😍😍😍 From Indonesian🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WinstonSmith6
Жыл бұрын
I want to see the video of an airdrop with the crew inside. That must be nerve wrecking.
@Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky
Жыл бұрын
The crew is not inside during an airdrop…
@jarinorvanto4301
Жыл бұрын
@@Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky Oh yes, "even with the crew inside the vehicle, truly a unique potential"!
@ilijaspasojevic7031
7 ай бұрын
@@Snortolodmyr-SS-Cokelensky @Jari Norvanto is absolutely right..
@satheeshnarayanan701
Жыл бұрын
I wish it incorporates 750 hp engine, APS, ERA Panels at the expense of it's overall weight (even upto 25 tonnes).
@RiccardoTheBeAst
Жыл бұрын
The heavier version already exist, it's BMP-3. BMD-4 has to remain light-weight to be air transportable and air droppable ;)
@JeanLucCaptain
Жыл бұрын
it is an air assault vehicle it is already having to shave weight everywhere it possibly can.
@AsbestosEnjoyer
19 сағат бұрын
@@RiccardoTheBeAstyeah but it could be a bit heavier, as what is the likelihood of airborne troops having to cross a river or something bigger than what they could just drive through? And even if they came up to a river, wouldn't it be easier to hold the riverbank and wait for the enemy counterattack over it?
@vadim-2068
Жыл бұрын
Great car ! She showed herself well in battles
@jeffreyprezalar220
Жыл бұрын
No it hasnt it gets hit by 2 40 mm grenades and it goes up like petrol bomb
@lexburen5932
Жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyprezalar220 yes off course. no military vehicle is invincible. Just like the flop F35 keeps falling out of the sky
@alexnderrrthewoke4479
3 ай бұрын
@@lexburen5932😂😂😂💀💀💀💀
@alexnderrrthewoke4479
3 ай бұрын
@@jeffreyprezalar220it holds better than burning abrams cemetery in ukraine
@AsbestosEnjoyer
19 сағат бұрын
@@jeffreyprezalar220of course it does, it's armor is basically the same grade as standard issue body armor, that is to say, stops 7,62 nato on a good day, if even that
@hope8612
Жыл бұрын
Браћо са вама смо Србија Русија браћа заувек
@EVGENIVS-LXIII
Жыл бұрын
Вещь!!!👍👍👍✊
@rockval.1061
Жыл бұрын
Excelente vehículo 🇲🇽🙏🇷🇺 ❤️
@typhoon2643
Жыл бұрын
Impressionnant 🤩👍
@NoahBranch503
23 күн бұрын
The engineer is asking hey how many guns should the turret have designer says yes guns😂
@carmanahdoang1951
Жыл бұрын
Urraaaa.... From Indonesia 👍👍
@jawedmanowar657
Жыл бұрын
In this Gun Turret an 50 caliber Gattling gun type should also made to provide high volume high Firr Power to overwhelm enemy Defence with Secondary Air defence role inbuilt in it
@playoffmodesp2536
Жыл бұрын
It has a coaxial 50. Cal already doesn't it?
@henrik_worst_of_sinners
Жыл бұрын
7,62x54mmr, wich is more than enough to chew up infantry. 50 cal is redundant as it has a 30mm autocanon. 50 cal is a "neither here nor there" caliber anyway.
@playoffmodesp2536
Жыл бұрын
@@henrik_worst_of_sinners fair I thought it was 12,7 mm side cannon. But the more I think about it, it wouldn't make any sense since they already have a 30 mm automatic anti-material cannon.
@norbertaronvarga5361
Жыл бұрын
Looking away from it's unusability, 50 caliber barrel length, but what caliber? 12,7mm? 20mm? 30mm? 127mm? 406mm?
@playoffmodesp2536
Жыл бұрын
@@norbertaronvarga5361 the .50 caliber is exclusively 12,7mm. Therefore all the cannon diameters you listed don't apply. 406 mm is a WW2 naval gun type battery. It's ludicrous to call that a .50 cal. No the .50 BMG is 12,7mm pistol, rifle, MG all same diameter
@lucianogomesgutierrez1629
Жыл бұрын
🇧🇷❤️🇷🇺
@jttoe3424
Жыл бұрын
Will see more of this on the battle front...
@zorbaknecromancer
Жыл бұрын
You can play for free now in War Thunder! War Thunder is a free-to-play vehicular combat multiplayer video game developed and published by Gaijin Entertainment.
@jeffreyprezalar220
Жыл бұрын
These vehicles need aps badly
@JeanLucCaptain
Жыл бұрын
i wonder what that big cut out in the rear hull is for? probably for the airdrop equipment though it seems like a huge space sacrifice so their would have to be a very good reason for it on a vehicle that had to shave as much weight as possible and where space is at an absolute prmium even more then other AFVs. also the fact most versions can be airlifted and not actually dropped is interesting. as far as i can tell the Russians are the only people who have an actually viable airdropped IFV (though this if more a fire support vehicle). the best the Germans ever made was the Wesel a tiny fire support vehicle little more then a self-propelled 20mm autocannon or tow launcher (and it had to chose one or the other). and the Americans gave us the terribly flawed M551 Sheridan that tried too hard to be a tank and was insanely complex while also having armour so thin as to be pointless. Its interesting when you think about it as the Hind is also unique in that it is effectively a Flying IFV.
@jaskong5093
Жыл бұрын
Please do not amazed if TNI AL(INDONESIAN MARINES)Use this Tank for amphibious assault ☺ 💪👍
@VS-iw3xr
28 күн бұрын
Thats BMP...this is for airborne troops
@ricardogunnz2
Жыл бұрын
Not a Bradley, but not too bad...
@UncleQ57
Жыл бұрын
На заставке и на кадрах с выставки в ролике - 4 без М.
@mochabdu88
8 ай бұрын
Inovasi dan desain yang luar biasa
@joserivadeo7138
Жыл бұрын
Sra, a cuánto cada uno ??
@liliwinnt6
Жыл бұрын
how about making an btr that is longer and taller than the btr-mdm and based on the bmp-3 chassis
@ДенисС-п6щ
9 ай бұрын
Это великолепные машины, но к сожалению сама концепция ВДВ под вопросом, в связи с совершенством средств ПВО, в том числе переносных. Транспортный самолет просто не зайдет в место высадки десанта. Но если будет решен вопрос с прохождением ПВО и сбросом десанта - такие войска могут перерезать коммуникации, совершить диверсии, глубокие рейды и вообще доставить очень много неприятностей противнику.
@BretBucherrealtor
Жыл бұрын
I hit the Bell
@zackyloekman8818
6 ай бұрын
Light but has heavy weapons
@dnxi5272
Жыл бұрын
US doesn't have something like this
@zemog1025
Жыл бұрын
where do you put the INFANTRY
@Otaku.Pilot-99
Жыл бұрын
I have the same question, no clue.
@mbtenjoyer9487
Жыл бұрын
Behind the gun / auto loader
@Otaku.Pilot-99
Жыл бұрын
@@mbtenjoyer9487 where are the doors to the compartment? Is te one on top just behind the turret?
@mbtenjoyer9487
Жыл бұрын
@@Otaku.Pilot-99 behind the turret it’s kinda like a hatch
@tragiet367
Жыл бұрын
Xe này chỉ để yểm trợ lính dù thôi còn chở quân là btr bmd
@kgbdz9373
Жыл бұрын
🇩🇿❤️🇷🇺
@blugaledoh2669
Жыл бұрын
It would be better to move the engine to the front.
@ilijaspasojevic7031
7 ай бұрын
The Russians are increasingly making such vehicles, where the engine is in the front.. Seriously. They are now literally in war production. Factories work day and night, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. And they have dozens, if not hundreds of such factories. They try all the variants. And those that perform well in training and even in combat conditions in Ukraine will enter regular production..
@katoy9976
7 ай бұрын
Bundan sonra 😎
@BrimFreedom-c2m
19 күн бұрын
88258 Turner Locks
@bock1283
Жыл бұрын
It doesn't it doesn't matter the capability of the vehicle if the crew isn't trained.
@AnthonyAdelaide-x2h
26 күн бұрын
7398 Grant Port
@ginoramirez4290
Жыл бұрын
tanque aerotransportado , bien
@Евгений-ф7р6и
4 ай бұрын
На экспорт могут делать, а для себя нет?)
@MitsukoValladores-r9i
19 күн бұрын
Harris Forges
@JoseDownie-k4f
17 күн бұрын
Kelton Falls
@gerhard8616
Жыл бұрын
Barang ini bagus buat airbone drop didaerah rawan papua yg gk bisa d akses jalur darat...
@AustinClaire-c5c
Күн бұрын
Littel Road
@Homoprimatesapiens
Жыл бұрын
According the video clip the 100mm gun got a firing rate of at least 300 rpm. Not really 10 rpm as stated by the narrator.
@twunt2000
Жыл бұрын
That's the 30mm firing at 300 rpm, not the 100mm main gun.
@Reginvalt
Жыл бұрын
Last gen BMP/BMD have triplet armament: 100mm low ballistic rifled bore cannon/ATGM launcher, 30mm high ballistic cannon and 7,62 mm machine gun. 300 rpm or so must be 30mm cannon.
@sexymurr2878
Жыл бұрын
Классная👍🏼✌🏻
@dk1064
Жыл бұрын
105mm Canon best
@davidjames1063
Жыл бұрын
A few of these could give most Western tanks a bad day. Rapid fire 100mm would be devastating from sides or rear.
@andrew2353
Жыл бұрын
The 100mm gun is low velocity and can't fire traditional anti-tank munitions, but it doubles as a launcher for ATGMs.
@BernalMaxwell-j8u
Ай бұрын
Orn Trafficway
@MarinaPoullion-m1y
Ай бұрын
Batz Plaza
@mansurtxafapapaias3517
Жыл бұрын
Proyección
@InclinationMerch
22 күн бұрын
Fahey Canyon
@giorgi8272
Жыл бұрын
😉👍❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🤙
@HuntingtonNick-y6v
26 күн бұрын
Celestine Oval
@MichaelStewart-k4z
Ай бұрын
Becker Road
@Orcawhale1
Ай бұрын
You guys should cancel the BMD series and just focus on making more BMP-3's. Airborne operations arn't going to be a thing for you guys in a long time.
@userboykey121
Жыл бұрын
😃
@abhishekdev258
Жыл бұрын
Sprut tank??
@ilijaspasojevic7031
7 ай бұрын
What about him? It has a T-90, 125 mm tank gun on a nearly similar, if not identical, chassis to the BMD-4. It also has amphibious capabilities, as well as the ability to drop everything with a crew by special parachutes directly onto the battlefield. It has weak armor, but makes up for it with its excellent maneuverability and high firepower. The Russians call it a "light tank", which it is to some extent.
@abhishekdev258
7 ай бұрын
@@ilijaspasojevic7031 I am saying isn't both of them the same thing
@ethanmac639
Жыл бұрын
why does Russia keep manufacturing old equipment instead of their new equipment designs?? *>edit~//- I fully support Russia and Putin, VIVA Mother Russia🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺-//~*
@KrullNortherly
Жыл бұрын
Потому что Россия делает оружие для реальной и тяжёлой работы, а не для циркового шоу с клоунами.
@bugraburakates2548
Жыл бұрын
That should be... We all see what happens to old cold war era systems in Ukraine.
@bartunthegreat2999
Жыл бұрын
This isn't old. Is different from older BMPs. It is made for air dropped units.
@inhcaominhpham9512
Жыл бұрын
The equipment inside is more important. They are the latest
@Lyo_nel
Жыл бұрын
Vean los PZH 2000 motorizados Alemanes en Ucrania, quedaron inútiles por falta de repuesto, sufrieron "rápidos" desgaste y no soportaron duro "trabajo"
Пікірлер: 133