Iran and Bosnia BROTHERS Good luck to Bosnia in qualifying for the Euros this week! Much love to Bosnia from an Iranian
@meehanparast
10 жыл бұрын
This is what Bosnia can expect in the World Cup, Iran won without their two best players against a full force Bosnia at Bosnia
@peterpham2473
6 жыл бұрын
Wrong dipshit! Bosnia fucked Iran 3-1 in your stupid face
@rouzbeh61
10 жыл бұрын
Hey guys we need to respect Bosnian team they played well. Our defense was useless in covering Dzeko. Now our defense is one of the strongest in Asia, so I am sure Bosnians have hard time dealing with it. Bosnian team has improved since 2009 and I am sure they have add some good players to their line up, otherwise they could not advance to world cup. The Iranian team in this video was Iranian B team with 3 to 4 players from A team, so they played not good at the beginning when they changed players and brought the A team players they scored and won the match at the end. Our team right now is completely different from that team. We have a lot of new faces. Our defense which has always been our weakness, became our strong point. We had a lot of problem at scoring goal up to 6 month ago. Our new set of strikers are smart and awesome but they are new and need more games to gain experience. Keyrosh has changed our team style from an aggressive attacking team to a more less risk taking defensive, but opportunist one. The good thing about this formation is that we can last longer against Argentina and cancel Nigerian or Bosnian attacks on our goal, but this is only good for draws and not wins. Our right Midfielder is great and gucci and other young strikers are doing great performance. We need more talents in our left wing and the center to put more pressure on Bosnian and Nigerian defense line. Javad and Ando are getting old and they can not keep their great shape for more than 2 years. In fact Ando is going down already. New talents need to be found to replace those positions. I hope Karim Ansari, Gucci, Dejagah, Javad, Shojai and the rest score for us at world cup and show a great performance. We like to see great football, wining come next. Bosnians need to take Iran seriously as well otherwise they will be shocked. Good luck to both Iranian and Bosnian fans. I hope we stay friends even after these hot football debates. Football is Iranians passion number 1.
@wdfsmdu
10 жыл бұрын
Why are we hating on Iran ? We are both Muslim nations. I am looking forward to the Iran Bosnia match up in the World Cup, it is going to be a good game, and we will have our star goalkeeper Asmir Begovic on goal.
@eldobrat5937
10 жыл бұрын
otkad ti je bosna muslimanska zemlja? Koliko znam nikada ona muslimanska bila nije.
@ArinaBorina
10 жыл бұрын
Eldo Brat It is a very muslim country, btw Iran was the one helping them when they were dying of hunger in the serbia bosnia war, if you don't believe me, google it.
@wdfsmdu
10 жыл бұрын
Eldo Brat lol eldo ill give you a chance to remove your comment before i report it as spam.
@eldobrat5937
10 жыл бұрын
prijavljuj ti mene koliko hoćeš. Ni dan danas, ni u historiji Bosna nije bila muslimanska država, nego samo Bošnjačka. Ja sam zagovornik Bošnjačke države, ne islamske.
@ashkanmoradi1803
10 жыл бұрын
i am iranian. iran 6 bosni 0 , mondial 2014 brazil
@ArinaBorina
10 жыл бұрын
Eldo Brat You seem like a sad guy Haha
@ArinaBorina
8 жыл бұрын
Well it's not a hot topic, but they are pretty neutral. They like Serbians and Bosnians, both to an extent. Croatians are the most popular people in Iran though. Many people think that Serbia were the good guys in the war while some other think differently, but again, most of them are neutral.
@GeeDougg1
8 жыл бұрын
+Гаврило Принцип "Know" about things that didn't happen?! We KNOW about what did happen, which is the opposite of what you're trying to say, which is that the Bosnians were massacred at the hands of the Serbs, as the majority fo the rest of the world realizes and admits. The crimes were mainly and mostly by the Serbs, and the Bosnians were the victims of your ilk.
@GeeDougg1
8 жыл бұрын
+Гаврило Принцип You yourself seem to be in denial. You still stick to your guns and deny the truth! There was no Bosnian genocide of Serbs. There were killings of Serbs, yes, but in a war that the Serbs started, after besieging Sarajevo and committing numerous massacres, there's a reason no one really says that the Serbs were "victims". Do you understand why that is?! Documents collected by Ljiljana seem to be your "go-to" source, and you prefer to call them "document", but I guess bias and subjectivity mean nothing to you, because you're perfectly willing to use them! See? You still don't get that even IF specific examples of Serbs being attacked or killed by "Muslims" exist (interesting that you call them 'Muslims', and not "Bosnians"!), they neither show a "GENOCIDE" of Serbs at the hands of Muslims, nor reverse the truth and fact of the matter at hand, which is that unless you're perfectly happy to feed on nothing but pro-Serbian propaganda from your own midst, you'd have to admit that your Serbian side committed a far worse massacre against the Bosnians. Do you still vehemently deny that?! You still don't seem to get - or don't seem to want to accept - that there is no "my version" here - I don't have a version of events. You DO have one because you choose to have one and choose to see things differently because it hurts your national pride, and you seem severely unprepared to deal with the cognitive dissonance associated with admitting guilt to yourself and then forgiving yourself the proper way. So, you can go on believing that I'm merely doing what you're doing, and "believing in 'my' version of events" - it doesn't change the fact that I'm addressing the reality of what happened. I get that you don't like it, and I get that you don't want to admit to any major ownership of the majority of the wrongdoing on the part of your people and your 'side' - nor will you likely ever do so - but I can't just agree with you simply in order to make you feel better. You're still not even able to understand that I never denied 'Muslims' (?!) - meaning Bosnians, I assume - also committed crimes, and I never denied that they did so. The problem is that you can't accept that they only committed crimes AFTER the Serbs started the war and began their aggression, and that over 90% of the heinous war crimes and terrible crimes against humanity were committed by the Serbs against all of the others in the Balkans. Not have the name of Muslims killed by Serbs?! Wait, are you actually wanting me to dig up the names of Muslims killed by Serbs?!You DO realize there are tons of Muslims (Bosnians) killed by Serbs, and that there would be no point in me copy-pasting them, right?! What is that supposed to prove, anyway?! You knowing the name of specific Serbs is akin to Zionists knowing the names of specific Israelis killed by Hamas, as though that makes Palestine guilty and makes the Israelis guilt-free. Your logic is flawed there, pal. Either way, I'm not here to deny anything, and if you open your eyes you'll see that.
@GeeDougg1
8 жыл бұрын
"I used these documents of Ljiljana, because I saw them, and you didnt see," Wait, so "seeing" something automatically makes it true now?! Or is it that you WANT to see them to be true because they happen to agree with what you want to think?! "Iranians even dont know that there is such a good researcher." My standards for "researchers" are higher than to claim some random person arguing form a subjective point of view is a "good researcher". What do you have to base that opinion on?! Oh, right, the fact that she white-washes Serbia's crimes in the war. "I believe that she is honest and cant lie." It gets better! So, not only do you unreasonable believe that she is "honest" - unless your view of what "honest" means is twisted - but you also believe that she can't lie! Perfect! So she's now infallible. Honestly, I don't know if you can see or hear yourself, but what you're saying is a few steps beyond total madness. Is this what blind fervent nationalism does?! Because it's very ugly. "Because no one of Bosnian researchers could prove that she was lying, so, Ljiljana wrote the truth." You don't seem to understand how 'truth' works. If you make a claim, you have to prove your claim to be true independently of what others say, and others potentially not being able to disprove those claims doesn't automatically make those claims 'true'. That's a logical fallacy. The lack of disproof does not an automatic proof make. "And she collected all proofs, that Bosnians did make genocide around Srebrenica (according to international definition of genocde). 2400 Serbs civilans were killed, in brutal way, 90% were women and children, and this IS a genocide. This is a fact. Western media, of cource, will not write about this genocide." You seem to be confusing the international definition of genocide for what you think genocide means. Do you want me to give you the definition of genocide?! Or are you trying to claim that what happened to your people WAS directed against the Serbs and that the numbers ARE significant enough?! None of the arguments that could prove such a claim actually check out, so no, there was no genocide of Serbs especially compared to the genocide that the Serbs committed against the Bosnians, and the "proofs" by Ljiljana and others aren't really "proofs" when they're subjective and mere claims that can neither be proven nor disproven. You's like to THINK that they can be proven, but you can't reason that to be true and they can't be proven to be true because the opposite proof of their lack of truth exists. You want to continue to claim that an ever-changing figure of around a couple of thousand dead Serbs is "genocide" but it doesn't make it so, and you're not going to convince me or any other rational person of that, and you can continue telling yourself that that's only because of "Western media", but you'd be lying to yourself and ignoring the fact that many of us aren't "educated by Western media" and don't get our information from Western media at all. "But some independent western media and researches wrote. I can give you a link, written by independent British specialist Christopher James, that Bosnians killed more than 1300 Serb civilians in Srebrenica. here it is." Oh yes, of course, as always there are British and French who, even in the face of infinite mounting pressure and mountains of counter-evidence and reasoning, will still try their best to claim that everyone is mistaken about an event involving 'Muslims', because ever the defenders of anti-Muslim behaviour and discreditors of all things 'Muslim', many of these Western sources will always claim that the Muslims were in fact responsible even when all evidence shows that they were the victims. Oh, but wait, now suddenly those Western sources are "good" because they "agree with you", right?! You may have to make up your mind, because it seems the sources are the issue, which brings me back to the fact that you have to analyze intent. There will always be people from almost any side who can claim anything, but their reasons for doing so are far more important than the fact that they DO choose to do so. Your link doesn't work, by the way, and a search for Christopher James brought up nothing. It's too bad that Christopher James - assuming he's even an actual researcher at all - can simply gloss over the facts of the massacre of the Bosnians and try to reverse it and claim that it was somehow supposedly "actually the Serbs who got massacred by the Bosnians". The truth sucks, I know and I get it - you're having a difficult time with living with it because no one wants to find themselves in the position of the Turks, responsible for the Armenian genocide, or the Serbs, responsible for the Bosnian genocide, or the Mongols, responsible for the genocide against all humans, etc. etc. - but what chance do you think you have of ever convincing anyone of sound mind that they're simply "mistaken" and that they need to listen to a few subjective sources and opinions that completely reverse facts compiled through mountains of evidence and reasoning from various sources everywhere else?! It's not exactly difficult to see right away that your side has trouble accepting that they were the 'bad' guys.
@omglollmao123
13 жыл бұрын
@Poya6666 Iranians & Bosnians have never fought each other in history. In fact, to the contrary Iran supported the Bosnians during the Yugoslav Wars.
@moeduroodchi2161
2 жыл бұрын
Boznia,s second goal was offside.
@Ninodalix
13 жыл бұрын
unbelievable, once again beaten by Iran. Bravo, that is all I can say.
@Darwinvoyager
14 жыл бұрын
I'm glad arash borhani isn't part of the squad for the training camp in austria this july. we have much better strikers. hes lucky that goal went in. iran are going to win the asian cup because ghotbi know what he's doing. so up for Iran vs Spain friendly this summer.
@EricTyce
15 жыл бұрын
you're right there're lots of armenians in tehran and specially isfahan, about 200,000.
@sanijava
15 жыл бұрын
I was wondering how many substitutions were made after leading 2-0, i Think Blazevic put the bench on the field and realized how crap they are after conceding 3 goals in 10 minutes.
@ramtinreihani8429
10 жыл бұрын
I just hate when people hate each other I love peace
@jesusonXTC
10 жыл бұрын
The same result that will hapen in the world cup
@bosanskipatriota2295
3 жыл бұрын
3 1 in your face 😂
@Italian.wiseguy
Жыл бұрын
@@bosanskipatriota2295 2-0 back to you
@bosanskipatriota2295
Жыл бұрын
@@Italian.wiseguy friendly vs our c team 🤡
@bosanskipatriota2295
Жыл бұрын
@@Italian.wiseguy give your women freedom first
@Italian.wiseguy
Жыл бұрын
@@bosanskipatriota2295 I'm young you clown wtf you talking about, and iran didn't had their 5 best players to play against your country and they still beat your ass in your home soil, so cut the BS.
@blue7zero984
10 жыл бұрын
Clearly you dont see dat Bosnia already gave up at 2nd goal they scored. But look closly Iran 1st goal was nice, 2nd Lucky and 3rd lucky cause the guy miss ball with slide at 2nd goal gk didnt expect dat
@danyjr
11 жыл бұрын
خیابانی: ما این بازی رو نمی بازیم و این خوبه این آقا هم اسمش گزارشگر تلویزیونیه
@hamzaskopljak1
11 жыл бұрын
iran cant beat bosnia in 2013......we just beat greece 3-1......... like if u agree
@omglollmao123
13 жыл бұрын
@971princess Well FIFA can. We we are currently ranked higher than you. Iran didn't even make it into the qualification stage of the 2010 World Cup Bosnia was one goal away from entering. So how's that for "not better than you"?
@BosnianBornBeast
10 жыл бұрын
So much for this game! 3-1 for Bosnia today haha!
@ArinaBorina
10 жыл бұрын
Dude you sound so stupid and so butthurt xD You guys got kicked out first off so thats a shame, by the way did you know Iran has went to world cup 4 times, Bosnia only once :D Yeah go cry, ugly bitch, go cry ;)
@BosnianBornBeast
10 жыл бұрын
Do you know that Bosnia was once part of a country called Yugoslavia!? And Yugoslavia reached 4th place in the 1960's! Go back to your Iran where you have trouble living with a horrible government while I chill out here in the USA!
@carolinesmith4330
10 жыл бұрын
Im not even iranian, but fuck bosnia, honestly you people disgust me. Iran saved your sorry asses and you know it.
@BosnianBornBeast
10 жыл бұрын
No they didnt! How did they save me and my people in Srebrenica!? Anyways fuck off and quit saying false things that didnt happen!
@BosnianBornBeast
10 жыл бұрын
Go away you dont know nothing about Bosnia, but hatered towards the country! Nice choice of getting out of here you deluded fuck!
@ashtonafrouzi1822
11 жыл бұрын
iran beat south korea in seoul with only 10 men....
@westawessem
13 жыл бұрын
we just won this game
@kecman84
13 жыл бұрын
Znal' neko na kojem jeziku govori ovaj komentator, koji je ovo jezik?
@raminss80
11 жыл бұрын
Bosnia is our brothers IRAN and BOSNIA brothers so stop fighting please
@carolinesmith4330
10 жыл бұрын
So sad. Bosnia, congrats on your first win. owait Iran 5 - 1 Bosnia
@nerminmujic5323
9 жыл бұрын
Yeah but we won in the World Cup. Iran beat in a friendly and we beat you shit herders when it mattered. Fuck Iran.
@mehrdad5767
6 жыл бұрын
Meho Mujic hhhh 5-1😄😄😂
@persianpredicts1539
4 жыл бұрын
Nermin Mujic You still went out🤣
@xbosnianVKx
12 жыл бұрын
this game we lost because our goalie was injured
@parsadaq
12 жыл бұрын
if they are way better why they always lose against Iran , 5-2 in 2006 and 3-2 in 2009
@peterpham2473
6 жыл бұрын
Those are just friendly games you stupid son of a bitch
@richieporter142
10 жыл бұрын
dzeko 2 goals wer nice but it wasnt enuff 2 win watta come back by iran we r going 2 beat bosnia in da world cup iran beat bosnia without r best players gucci and dejagah playing 19yr star sardar azmoun who has arsenal offering 2million for him and battling as milan and juventas 4 an asian player he must be amazing 2 have great teams fighting 2 get him iran is even stronger now iran will get good results this summer
@blue7zero984
10 жыл бұрын
You got some issues kid... Go watch Cartoons...
@blue7zero984
10 жыл бұрын
Well you act like 12. + Every video about Wc or Iran you put "Iran gnna win bosnia - Nigeria etc... Every fqing video i cannot wait when Wc comes up so the guys put you arrogant Iranians on realistic ground ...
@richieporter142
10 жыл бұрын
Blue7zero u speak english i have a hard time understandin u da iranian fans players coach have a dream 2 see iran advance out da group and this wc we have a chance at 2nd jus like bosnia n nigeria unrealistic is sayin iran going 2 beat argentina and win group f iran is stong enuff 2 beat bosnia n nigeria that is realistic bosnia is a strong team if iran would lose 2 them i wouldnt be mad cuz there a good team they mite even tie iran mite beat nigeria and tie bosnia or it could be da other way around who knows
@blue7zero984
10 жыл бұрын
Well that aint gnna happen you know...
@richieporter142
10 жыл бұрын
will see wat happens iran nigeria bosnia each have a chance at 2nd it could be any1 of those teams can get out da group iran beat bosnia so many times that has already happened and it could agian this time in da wc wer it matters most
@22somebody
15 жыл бұрын
kurac bi iran dobio da su spahic i supic nastavili ali bolje da ih je ciro izveo nego da se ne povrjede zbog kvalifikacija nije tu bilo ni misimovica glavnog igraca tako da su iranci imali dosta srece sto smo igrali sa dosta slabijim sastavamo ali i ovako nije lose minimalan poraz (jest da mi je krivo) ali trebalo je vidjet i mladje igrace kako igraju
@ramtinreihani8429
10 жыл бұрын
All you Bosnian or whatever ur called why hate we helped u guys come on guys world peace.
@ramtinreihani8429
10 жыл бұрын
Sorry I didn't mean the first part I meant world peace
@GeeDougg1
8 жыл бұрын
+Гаврило Принцип No, they did not. The Bosnians suffered under the Serbian genocide, not the other way around. You can keep trying to reverse the facts and repeat and shout your version of events at the top of your lungs until you`re blue int he face, but it doesn't change what actually happened.
@GeeDougg1
8 жыл бұрын
+Гаврило Принцип "Why do you think that only your version is a truth?" That doesn't even make any sense! How can there rationally, realistically and logically be more than one version of 'truth'?! Truth shouldn't be subjective, and if you think it should then that's actually an unwitting admission and an exposition of flaws in thinking on your part that reveal why you may be so intent on sticking to "your version" of events as opposed to an objectively deduced and widely-proven version of events. "In fact, you believe to American lie, because you dont know wise scientists." Actually, I do know real scientists and historians, and the funny thing you don't seem to realize is that what I'm saying goes against what the American media and establishment WANT to show. The global and European media have long decided not to deny the facts of the Bosnian war, and had to come clean about a great deal of it. Of course, they still only did so for their own benefit, and there's no denying that, but it also doesn't change the fact that they're still right. The Americans are merely right by proxy here. It's convenient that you keep referring to the vague idea of the "American lie" - it's like blaming "socialists" for everything without even having to get into details about how the socialists are supposedly behind everything or guilty of everything. "The truth about this war is prohibited by America and its media." If that were the case then they'd be teaching that the Serbs were the innocent victims. For once the Americans are unwillignly and reluctantly having to tell the truth, and you're ironically against them. Think about that one.... "I read a book with true documents, and it was written that Serbian mothers are crying because of losing their children from 1 to 12 years old, because of Bosnian genocide." So, in other words, you read propaganda from the hard-liners and right wingers on the Serbian side who are unwilling to admit to their faults and to their crimes. Their egos won't let them come clean and take responsibility for what their side did to their brethren, and now you're copying, adopting and carrying their ego and the burden of hiding the truth that is associated with it. There are many books written on the details of the Holocaust, and believe it or not many of those details are also not true. How do you judge something to be true? How do you decipher knowledge and arrive at 'the truth'?! I'd be curious to see how this process works in your mind, because I don't think it's common or similar to that of many other people even in Europe or the Balkans. Just because something is in a book doesn't make it 'truth'. "Scientist Ljiljana wrote 8 books," Why is this person a "scientist"?! Because she has one specific 'degree' in something?! Because she wrote books?! Because she says so?! Those do not create 'scientists' out of a person. You need to take 'science' a lot more seriously. Some Serbian woman, whom you choose to believe to be completely truthful in everything she "reports", wrote some books. Is that it?! "she collected all documents," All of what documents?! And from which side?! More faulty thinking. Work out the logic for me: how would a woman possessing such documents just be "ignored" by the entire rest of the West simply because you seem to want to think that everyone simply chooses to be "anti-Serbian"?! What is the motive?! What is the gain?! "went to Serbian villages and spoke with Serbs - victims of Bosnian genocide," Yeah, there's that bloodied goat again - you seem to be such a die-hard believer in the made-up "Bosnian genocide of Serbs" that you're almost living in an alternate version of reality you're choosing to construct for yourself. So, she went to Serbian villages and spoke with Serbs, and we're supposed to take the word of the Serbs as proof of "genocide"?! You're joking, right?! Let me guess, the Serbs are all truth-tellers and honest and good-willed people when it comes to reporting about the Bosnian then, right?! Uh, no. "she had collected video and audio materials from them, about terrible Bosnian genocide." More repetition. It's like you've learned from Goebbels. It doesn't change the objective facts, pal. And where are these videos and bits of audio?! Oh, right, she collected them, and that's good enough. So, she must have collected thousands of them as well, huh?! "In her books, all Serb witnesses of Bosnian genocide have names, and identification, and no one could prove to her that she is lying," Wait, what? Why would that even be the method od argument?! How can you prove TO someone who may be lying that he or she may be lying?! Why would that even matter?! If that person is lying, then there's no proving anything to them, no point in convincing them of anything, and no way they'd ever admit it anyway either. So why even mention that?! Yes, I'm sure the people on the Serbian side killed by Bosnians have names, and I'm sure there are a couple-thousand or so of them. Compare that to the tens of thousands of the Bosnian victims of Serbian genocide, then sit down and hang your head in shame. Who would be "proving" to her that she's lying anyway?! Serbs?! "so it is all truth." The 'truth' seems to be a rather elastic and flexible device to you. You may want to look into that.... "For example, [...] Muslim neighbours!" You're going a mile a minute mentioning a few specific cases that are supposed to prove a "genocide", all the while forgetting the meaning and the conditions that prove such supposed events to be as such. I don't even have any proof that any of these specific people being killed were actually cold-blooded murders at the hands of 'Muslims' (Bosnians), as opposed to mere victims of the war, which, again, THE SERBS BEGAN. Never mind the proof of the "genocide" of Serbs. "Why do you deny this suffering of Serbs?" Aaaaand we're back to that. Deny the suffering of Serbs?! I never denied the suffering of the Serbs. Why do you deny the truths and the details and facts of the war? Why do you deny that the Bosnians were largely the primary victims and that your kind were the instigators? Why do you deny that a couple of thousand Serbs dying or suffering doesn't amount to a "genocide", nor does it give you the excuse to deny the actual truth which is that the Serbs themselves committed a genocide against others, and that their efforts were coordinated TO BE as such?! ...
@GeeDougg1
8 жыл бұрын
+Гаврило Принцип First of all, you cherry-picked through what I'd written, AGAIN, and didn't respond to all of it, despite the fact that I responded to everything you'd written, bit by bit, and in detail. Secondly, you're doing this again, and you're not even bringing any new ideas - you're just repeating what you said before which I'd already disproved and reasoned against, seemingly under the impression that mere repetition of those lies will strengthen your case. It does not. "Our problem is that we believe to different sources." No, our problems aren't merely the source.s You have to go beyond the sources and analyze objectively and without bias. I don't care about the sources. If something can be reasonably proven then its acceptable as 'truth'. The large majority of what I know come from alternative sources and most of what Western sources teach disagree with what I believe. "I believe mostly to non-official Western (and of course Serbian)," Well, that's a pretty bad place to start - how do you think you cam ever arrive at anything even remotely resembling truth if you're going by Serbian sources and you yourself ARE Serbian?! That's bias on top of bias waiting to happen. "you believe mostly to official Western, and of coure Iranian which are, I think, based on Bosnian sources (and by the way, Bosnian sources that I read, are practically identical with official Western media)." Again, NO. You seem very intent on seeing things as being black and white and simplistic, but that is not the case. Iran's sources are its own as well as French, German, Lebanese, Egyptian, Russian, British, Swedish and Indian, while also being directly from the sources themselves. Most of the rest of the planet in fact don't get their "sources" on this issue from 'America' or from the Bosnians. That would be downright silly. You're also refusing to accept that sources that disagree with you can be from anything other than 'American' or 'Bosnian' sources, which is a logical fallacy, because you're essentially trying to fit everything into a nicely categorized and labelled reduction of its original idea in order to make it "less offensive and shocking" to you, and less capable of letting it create an impact of any kind. Bias comes from the ego, and the ego fights hard to protect it. "And the question is what sources are right, isnt it?" Not exactly. As I said, you have to go beyond merely trying to find which source is correct, and begin reasoning. The human power of reason trumps all else, and it's our number one way of understanding things even when logic and systems analysis fail completely. If you can reason, you can discover original intent, and you can begin to piece together what did happen and why. Of course, secondary information is also relevant and useful, but without reasoning you can't really connect the dots. "I will simply tell you the information that I know from different sources, including some independent (non-official) Western," Look, you need to understand that just because something is believed based on its origin in "different sources" doesn't necessarily make it truthful, nor does it present the end-all-be-all of what the truth of the matter might be simply because there is diversity in the sources used and/or relied on. Does it make a more compelling and interesting case, and does it add value and change the probabilities? Maybe, but that still largely depends on whether you know what to do with the sources and the information that they're all providing. "and you will read and say if it is truth or lie. And you can write your arguments why do you think so. I will read and politely reply to you." Well, I can't really expect any more or less, but sure. I'll read the sources and reply. I'm hoping you're ready for the replies because you may not get what you expect. "1.You said that Bosinans couldnt do this genocide because they were busy by defending themselves.You dont know that, in fact, different regions of Bosnia had completely different situation." Not true, and in fact I do know that most of Bosnia - some 70% of it - was unarmed and poorly trained and equipped. There were factions and militias amounting to 'gangs', bu they were nowhere near the level of preparation and equipment that the Bosnian Serb brigades serving with the JNA were. Did different regions of Bosnia have slightly differing situations? Yes. But does that mean that some were defending themselves while others were on the offensive and acting as the belligerents and the instigators? No, because the large majority of the civilian Serbian population and the Serbian militias were still in the same situation, and in the most densely populated areas they were vulnerable and undefended, so much of the militias were called to the defense of the besieged towns. "In fact, in some regions, Serbs were defending themselves from Bosnian army (in so-called "safety zones")." In what regions were these, and when?! Because the Serbs were only ever having to defend themselves AFTER the Serbian high command issued orders for their army units to besiege large swaths of Bosnian territory, and that essentially makes it either improbably (at best) that the Bosnians would be able to be on the offensive, or simply foolish to waste their resources on offense when they were desperately needed for defence against a far more heavily armed side. ...
@narimanm.9097
7 жыл бұрын
LegoKing, that was barely even English.... Something about how you love genocidal maniacs because it suits and feeds your nationalist bullshit.... Yeah, the Bosnians did a bit and committed some crimes, and the Serbs committed a genocide. We've been over this....
@Edin816
15 жыл бұрын
ma daj koje prodao...dzaba ti je kad nema spahica nazad ..a mozes dat 7 a primit 9
@itsfnc6029
2 жыл бұрын
🇮🇷2-0 🇧🇦 2020
@Muris01
10 жыл бұрын
Bosnia - Iran 2-0 that's my prediction no offence to iranians ;)
@harisdzanic7043
4 жыл бұрын
3-1🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦
@BosnianBornBeast
3 жыл бұрын
We about to get a terrible result tomorrow though
@Hossein-iz3pz
3 жыл бұрын
We won 2-0 now Lol
@harisdzanic7043
3 жыл бұрын
@@Hossein-iz3pz 🇧🇦🇧🇦🇮🇷🇮🇷
@taka0h
15 жыл бұрын
be cool anyway, iran won the game.
@1941MarsalTito
13 жыл бұрын
@kecman84 perzijski
@BosnianBornBeast
10 жыл бұрын
Dejagah got relegated lmao!
@peterpham2473
6 жыл бұрын
This Dejagah guy is just a nasty player
@Hossein-iz3pz
3 жыл бұрын
Yes because he was at bad form now look at us smashing you in 2-0 victory With the 2 smashing goals
@BosnianBornBeast
Жыл бұрын
@@Hossein-iz3pz congratulations on that Wales win! Yeah Bosnia has not been a good team since the World Cup in 2014 (or if I'm going to be lenient since 2016) and you sure would beat us now. It's just that I wanted Bosnia to progress back then 😂!
@eldobrat5937
10 жыл бұрын
This match was agreed.
@eldobrat5937
10 жыл бұрын
hamed mofid Do you know who are the Americans ?
@sam250505
10 жыл бұрын
lolol
@eldobrat5937
10 жыл бұрын
Sam T What's funny??
@sam250505
10 жыл бұрын
You. your comment. everything about you
@eldobrat5937
10 жыл бұрын
Fuck you Russia, fuck you Iran !! USA
@raminss80
11 жыл бұрын
buddy Iran Bosnia brothers so who cares
@adisice
15 жыл бұрын
ok ok u win can we have nuke bomb now??hehe
@adisice
15 жыл бұрын
so we can have bomb??cool thx xD
@omglollmao123
13 жыл бұрын
@971princess lol, stop being so goddamn sensitive and stop clinging onto beating Bosnia as some real impressive achievement.... Iran sucks. Bosnia sucks. Let's face facts. We've never been remarkably great teams, but right now Bosnia's the better of the two.
Пікірлер: 188