2萬的DAC應該好聲過 build in 的 DAC。可以選 R2R的 或 ES9038的 DAC。
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
20k 的確都有唔少選擇,不過仲要諗埋串流部份~(國仁)
@hgghfhbnj8505
10 ай бұрын
但ES chips通常比較硬底的聲音,用AD還不錯
@micchan9894
10 ай бұрын
Good
@Moominko
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing!
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
thanks man(國仁)
@garychen7000
10 ай бұрын
试听曲目好靓声、好精彩,赞啦
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
客氣客氣(國仁)
@axlpoon0
10 ай бұрын
覺得分開好D,始終network 嘢仲係快速進步中,分開換會更好
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
分開就靈活性高啲(國仁)
@earth1840
10 ай бұрын
當然買埋啦!應該會夾啲。😅
@supabayes3284
10 ай бұрын
Great review. I bought the 866 recently. Very musical all in one with outstanding bass. The built in dac is very close to my external dac (DCS Bartok 2.0), so it’s a bargain and I think that new buyers should go for it. An issue I face with the 866 is that it makes a static pop sound when lower the volume eg muting or lowering from 70 to 32. And again when I raise the volume up. Not sure if you have similar experience.
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
During my demo, I didn't encounter this issue. However, it does require the volume to be turned up quite high for it to function normally, and this has been somewhat troublesome for me. If I were to use it, I would definitely set it to operate in "pure power amp" mode (AV Bypass), pairing it with a high-quality streamer DAC-preamp. This should provide stability and excellent sound quality.
@hkgoodman888
10 ай бұрын
How much did you buy for?
@supabayes3284
10 ай бұрын
@@feverSoundHK you could be right, I haven’t tested it in pure power amp mode. But that’s going towards multi-boxes, away from all in one, which doesn’t get better than this (866). I also have the Lyngdorf TDAI 3400, but it is less impressive in all aspects except for room correction. But 866 just sounds better even without room correction.
@supabayes3284
10 ай бұрын
@@hkgoodman888 different countries, so not meaningful to compare. I have checked HK price, was quoted around 100,000. That’s very attractive compared to my country.
@munhontham59
10 ай бұрын
I have the 866 for 2 years now. No pop sound when adjusting volume. I have the DAC version
@munhontham59
10 ай бұрын
For me, one big downside is that the DAC does not take USB input. The USB slot is only for thumb drive or similar. Can’t connect to your file player using USB. So limited to only DSD resolution if you use AES/EBU. I drive a pair of Wilson Sasha with it. Volume usually at 54 to 66 when connecting to aurender N10
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
Boulder's digital input lacks RCA/BNC for S/PDIF, but interestingly, it features an XLR connector for AES3. This appears to be a manufacturer's insistence. However, connecting USB devices is simple; you can easily do so by purchasing an additional USB digital-to-digital converter (DDC), such as the Weiss INT204 or dCS Network Bridge.
@munhontham59
10 ай бұрын
@@feverSoundHK Thanks for the suggestion, I will look into it. I'm using AES at the moment, already pretty happy with the results. Just hope to squeeze more out of it 😊. But that would still limit it to the resolution supported by AES?
@kamtongwong9663
10 ай бұрын
一部到位!
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
Some manufacturers with a more "professional" orientation might believe that bitrates above 192kHz don't bring substantial benefits. Some even argue that high specifications are primarily marketing and promotional tactics. Additionally, they may consider USB interfaces as not inherently "professional" due to latency issues. While I can't speak specifically for Boulder, this perspective is held by some manufacturers in the industry.
@munhontham59
10 ай бұрын
@@feverSoundHK What you said make alot of sense. Boulder started off from professional audio. Hence all their equipment only has balanced inputs/outputs. The Boulder DAC that came with the 866 sounds amazing to me. Just hoping to have more options to play or experiment with, to be able to make those A/B comparisons.
@pak7lai95
10 ай бұрын
👍🏻
@hk3d
10 ай бұрын
呢部如果我揀會揀all in one. 好似外置都要花多好多先有聲音進步 只為介面的進步又好似唔係幾值得
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
的確係,因為好多 all in one 係偷輕咗某啲位,就價就成本,但呢部去到呢個價位,就做到好平均,而且最重要係佢嘅擴音機部份係完全唔使擔心,用家可以揀自已心愛嘅喇叭夾(國仁)
@AlexanderTG3
10 ай бұрын
Nice review! But I think I’ll buy Accuphase E4/5000, it’s cheaper and better quality
@feverSoundHK
10 ай бұрын
They are just different sound characteristic, quality is absolutely the same grade
@AlexanderTG3
10 ай бұрын
@@feverSoundHK Oh that’s good to hear! What’s the difference in sound going from the Boulder to an Accuphase?
This is a good question because I've owned the Diablo 300 for quite some time and am familiar with its sound. In short, in terms of power, there's not much difference between the two. Looking at the specifications, the Diablo 300 has slightly higher numbers, but in practical use, I find the 866 easier to match and achieve good results. The Diablo 300 can sometimes exhibit over-damping with certain speakers, requiring more careful consideration in speaker pairing. Personally, I'm more excited about Gryphon's upcoming integrated amplifier, the Diablo 333, but that is a more expensive option.
@csyeoh1
10 ай бұрын
Thank you. Great to have the english subtitles back again.Appreciate for your insight on Hifi.
Пікірлер: 118