Watch the latest episode of equipped on the six-bladed “knife-bomb” that is revolutionizing precision warfare: on.wsj.com/4bROkrh
@gaara-0172
4 ай бұрын
Produce more long format videos
@IamAWESOME3980
4 ай бұрын
ah, american military drones, made in china no doubt
@YahWay.
4 ай бұрын
@@IamAWESOME3980no, we got rid of Donald Trump so there's no more Sweet deals for China. No more Trump begging that block Chinese companies be unblocked And what was it, $70 million of interest income he declared in China?. Finally producing our own microprocessors in America, very little chance of what you're saying happening now. Thank God
@garrettfulks2932
4 ай бұрын
@@IamAWESOME3980 American military drones aren’t made in China.
@micahd1377
4 ай бұрын
Why does the US support Israel so much? Because Wall Street Journal and other presstitutes take their marching orders from the disgraceful Murdoch family.
@KuLpApA
4 ай бұрын
That is the longest advertisement I have ever watched...
@danquarterman
3 ай бұрын
Get Oprah browser. :) You're welcome.
@joshuaschmude7187
14 күн бұрын
So many people totally underestimate what our armed forces are really capable of. Millions of underwater autonomous drones, all with missles that can be fired at the flip of a switch. Badass.
@kathyabrahams9766
4 ай бұрын
Man killing man. Such a tragedy almost unbelievable 😢😢😢
@Nomad_TraderX
4 ай бұрын
I love watching videos on the rich people's network showing me where my tax dollars go and what they do with the money they consistently inflate out of my meager savings via deficit spending (a not so hidden tax). At least WSJ is honest - war is about money and they cover money stories so it's very appropriate they are the leaders in this reporting genre 💰
@wew5499
4 ай бұрын
Well said thx you
@LukeMahan-xr4xx
4 ай бұрын
War is a racket
@Nomad_TraderX
4 ай бұрын
@@LukeMahan-xr4xx I recommend the book!
@aldrinmilespartosa1578
4 ай бұрын
Poeple can't grasp larger things. Peace has a price on its own.
@Funko777
4 ай бұрын
@@aldrinmilespartosa1578 true, no one wants to fight America so that's pretty worth it. Plus if a more expensive piece of equipment can save the lives of soldiers then it's obviously worth it....also people vastly overestimate the value of our collective taxes. Most defense spending isn't coming from personal taxes.
@rogeronealjr8051
4 ай бұрын
How about self destruction abilities so the enemy doesn't have our technology?
@GrandALD.70s
3 ай бұрын
what technology bro ?? wake up sir ,,until today date and this moment at NOW ,USA and its allies plus Euro western Countries until this moment couldn't reach hypervelocity with huge failure on hypersonic projectiles projects which Russia advanced by far , Chinese Space science , and Iran drones, ballistic vehicles and aerodynamics. wake up Sir, u r very late this time of history that u r well know industrial manufacturing methods on very nice looking & most expensive just like those Sea Drones study took years and cost billions over became the nice looking solar panels fitted on most expensive non-advanced controlling board that loosing sat signal beside US's navy still recovering those drones without its original installed cameras which stolen by Iranian's IRG after hijacked them from Pers gulf and red sea shows u that IRGC wasn't interested with drones technology it appears they interested more with its cameras and recordings 😂 lol
@danquarterman
3 ай бұрын
;) that would be intolerably un-capitalistic. How dare you...
@luckyguy600
Ай бұрын
Ooops too late.
@carlosaaronfigueroapalacio5333
15 күн бұрын
Very problematic I'd say, that even could not guarantee the enemy not knowing your stuff. No worth the effort, I guess that's the reason nobody have done such.
@Steve33-c4o
4 ай бұрын
Awesome investments for the US and NATO!
@stevenphillips3466
4 ай бұрын
Every government contract for planes or Missiles ...Go with the original budget and multiple it by 2.5 times ..... That will be the true budget
@gangoffour6690
4 ай бұрын
The military industrial complex being the benefactor of this expense to the U.S. taxpayer. In actuality the U.S. is spending money we print out of thin air.
@luckyguy600
Ай бұрын
++ lol
@sofakingjewish
4 ай бұрын
a limerick. A stealthy boat called the Triton Could sail and submerge like Poseidon. Though cheap to attrit, Its sensors were lit, Giving intel that sailors would write on.
@Rob_F8F
4 ай бұрын
Triton is a reusable ISAR platform that costs the same as a one-use cruise missile, that's a bargain.
@drmodestoesq
4 ай бұрын
There once was boat from Kilkenny That could run underwater like a blenny Now this boat wasn't cheap Its price was quite steep But it could sink Russian boats aplenty.
@topiasr628
4 ай бұрын
Proving options for soldiers to fight on
@BorisPerc
4 ай бұрын
Poseidon is nuclear powered and have nuclear warhead dron that can dive all the world until the target is thermonuclearized.
@topiasr628
4 ай бұрын
@BorisPerc I know you're proud of it but it's a fantasy... Just like the Ruskie Mir and the fantasy of the "unstoppable Russian military" (see profile picture for how well those have turned out)
@seungltd
4 ай бұрын
This is just what they want you to see. Wonder how far classified technology has gone nowadays
@Biker65
4 ай бұрын
Let's hope far.
@churblefurbles
4 ай бұрын
@@Biker65 Competency crisis would say otherwise.
@Biker65
4 ай бұрын
@@churblefurbles You know nothing.
@Kodakcompactdisc
4 ай бұрын
@@Biker65 he thinks he’s John snow
@Biker65
4 ай бұрын
@@Kodakcompactdisc "You know nothing John Snow''
@mikeforce5926
4 ай бұрын
This is the best documentry video I have ever watched
@IanSinclair77
4 ай бұрын
It's interesting, but there is so much sales language in here that I expect the script was modified and approved by marketing from the companies. There is a lot of...not technically wrong, but objectove/misleading stuff...good, but...too much corporate sales language
@borninussr5615
4 ай бұрын
Very much spot on, it is a profit driven industry. "Oh it is so cheap, it cost only 2-3 gazzillion dollars, oh no problem we just print more money". Well, good luck with that 🤡🤡🤡
@henryksienkiewicz9464
4 ай бұрын
....evil language! Not sales.
@erikahl7180
4 ай бұрын
Agreed. A lot of things are misleading, like the talk of thermobarics, we have thermobaric handgrenades its not that special. Or how ukranian helicopters had soviet dumb rocket that work just like the hydra rockets but the "expert" acts like area of effect is a new capability. And most of the video was not about the title just US MIC sales propaganda.
@gangoffour6690
4 ай бұрын
It's not like the Ukraine is buying weaponry from the U.S. but the U.S. is just continuing the military action we started in 2014. There are few if any Ukrainian fighting age men left alive.
@RomanGolubev_A
4 ай бұрын
@@borninussr5615 show us an industry that's not profit-driven
@Lopro94
4 ай бұрын
What comfortable times for weapons manufacturers 💩
@LOLONO666
4 ай бұрын
it's been like this before the war
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg
3 ай бұрын
Invest in 155's
@luckyguy600
Ай бұрын
"How Sweet It Is" The Jackie Gleason Show
@RichardL.1453
4 ай бұрын
I'm suprised I haven't seen a drone shaped like a shark with movable fins.
@mattk8810
4 ай бұрын
Lol. Those exist
@bola0909
4 ай бұрын
Stay tuned!
@robertplatte5700
4 ай бұрын
they have been around for years the 1970's at least there was a movie made it was called JAWS
@lcfflc3887
4 ай бұрын
DARPA is listening.
@lmcsquaredgreendale3223
4 ай бұрын
@@mattk8810 I looked them up and this is what I got, Ghost Shark and Manta Ray are the names of prototype uncrewed underwater vehicles - UUVs or drones - introduced recently by Australia and the United States respectively. I'm digging deeper because I want to see one or both of these in their own environment. Thanks for the tip.
@twobucca
4 ай бұрын
The Booker looking like drone catnip, lol.
@picaresqueatheist
4 ай бұрын
America will never admit it's losing a war
@captsirl
4 ай бұрын
True.
@PAMELAPORTER-ci7mr
4 ай бұрын
We have. We lost Vietnam.
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg
3 ай бұрын
America will keep helping Ukraine unalive Russian life forms.
@jamesbrill7318
4 ай бұрын
Imagine how education in the U.S. could be improved if they put a tenth of what they use for weapons production into improving learning.
@retest6658
4 ай бұрын
So, Booker tank is the newer kind of Sherman tank?
@danny208YT
4 ай бұрын
My type of journalism. Good video
@Kodakcompactdisc
4 ай бұрын
I also enjoyed it
@csonracsonra9962
4 ай бұрын
33:38 It was pretty good but they straight b******* at us about the 155 production because guess what during World War One and World War II we were out producing today's numbers by an order of magnitude but we didn't have any CNC machines back then.... they're simply bullshiting people
@justatiger6268
4 ай бұрын
You like war propaganda?
@TheBucketSkill
4 ай бұрын
@@justatiger6268 unironically yea.
@AddieHilton
4 ай бұрын
The US has been using thermobaric weapons since the Vietnam War. In recent years they have conveniently renamed them as "novel explosive" to avoid bad PR. Hundreds of thermobaric Hellfire missiles have been used in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria - often in urban areas with little regard for civilian casualties.
@stephenkevindoss1474
4 ай бұрын
and i love how they accuse russia of attacking cities or “urban areas “ with out names of the cities. i was waiting for this bit of propaganda.
@Locuste
4 ай бұрын
video orlink of the proof is require or your words will vanished
@forfun6273
4 ай бұрын
Who cares.
@denniscrork318
4 ай бұрын
And, we're the 'good guys'? 😂😊
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg
3 ай бұрын
"unloved" life forms
@RickysRcChannel
3 ай бұрын
I am a drone pilot and retired chef, if you can get me out there, I'll do what's needed.
@teashea1
4 ай бұрын
very well done
@bartojoh
4 ай бұрын
at 2:49 "tantamount" - I think he means "paramount"
@colten1825
4 ай бұрын
most literate youtube commenter
@stevengill1736
4 ай бұрын
That Triton, if equipped properly, could be an excellent tool for oceanographic research! It could observe marine mammals, track birds, and observe physical parameters like currents, water temperature, etc. I can't wait to see what marine biologists do with this!
@Mr_MikeB
4 ай бұрын
Doubt marine biologists can afford to pay 2-3m per piece....
@dreb222
4 ай бұрын
Upgraded Bradleys supporting Bookers, supported by Abrams. That is one hellova force to be reckoned with.
@FredCarver-zz4ib
2 ай бұрын
It is so good to see a topic, or croup of topics done so well and in depth. The work is displayed well and explained well. It presents the topic well enough to see its benefits and the possible dangers of the system, Well done and I look forward to the next video.
@kevinc1200
4 ай бұрын
A Triton is the same cost as Tomahawk? That’s way too high.
@charlesyoung3444
4 ай бұрын
Bro it's a solar autonomous submarine that's small, it has incredible potential
@UnCannyValley67
4 ай бұрын
Mother effer is a sailboat AND a submarine, and its solar and autonomous AND can be self sufficient for 3 months at a time.
@debaterofeverythingpresent2775
4 ай бұрын
Before you say the Triton is too expensive, consider the costs, it requires a dozen bag of bushings worth 90 thousand dollars and comes fitted with that state of the art 10k toilet seat.
@Benson_aka_devils_advocate_88
4 ай бұрын
It ain't no rc sailboat that grandpa totes around the lake.
@pogo1140
4 ай бұрын
@@debaterofeverythingpresent2775 triton does not have a toilet
@MikeWoot-ox9xf
4 ай бұрын
38:46 🤔 We can really just tell it to penetrate for a lil while… and then explode. Awesome updates for old technology like me.
@AndreaDoesYoga
4 ай бұрын
Wow, this insight into war tech is eye-opening 🌐
@Av-vd3wk
4 ай бұрын
Um…this is an hour and 14 minute video and you posted this comment 2 minutes after it was uploaded.
@teeboogie3237
4 ай бұрын
@@Av-vd3wk to plays devil's advocate, they could have watched it at like 10x speed lol.... Its a bot
@touchofgrey5372
4 ай бұрын
Colombian - Japanese ??? Yep, that was eye-opening!
@jaypaige7550
4 ай бұрын
@@teeboogie3237 Or a member, members get to watch earlier.
@douggoldstein2433
4 ай бұрын
Nice yoga
@kabelolitheko
4 ай бұрын
Ai is going to be the death of humanity 😭😭😭😭
@80proteinbonny
3 ай бұрын
It wont ... individuals like You will help about "arteficial" ... whether like or not ... that could be problematic there goes explination that you should confront .... Go Try That :))))
@kabelolitheko
3 ай бұрын
@@80proteinbonny let’s learn to gather our thoughts and write them down first. Then we can talk, how about that?
@2muaddib
4 ай бұрын
Funny, but you, guys, completely forgot about new TOS-2, that fires rockets x3 further (~18 km) and is already out there.
@JRPGGUY
4 ай бұрын
I want to see more of th m10 booker
@wew5499
4 ай бұрын
Where would you like to see that? 😂
@connormcintosh4828
4 ай бұрын
A gentleman's club that hires exclusively "the newest and naughtiest IFVs in the country!"@@wew5499
@001vern
4 ай бұрын
After seeing what is happening in the Ukraine I don't think the M10 Booker would last very long on the modern battlefield. More armor, and/or better defensive weapons against ultralight drones are needed to survive today.
@garrettfulks2932
4 ай бұрын
@@001vern The reason that Russia and Ukraine have been losing a very large amount of equipment to drones is because they lack any defense systems against small UAVs and neither side has air superiority. The U.S. currently has anti UAV weapons at its disposal and is currently producing many of them to use so it would be different circumstances.
@voldemarvaglaots6690
4 ай бұрын
@@garrettfulks2932, losses are calculated in MS Excel...
@michaellynch1132
4 ай бұрын
the cost of a Ukrainian sea drone = $10K-15K. Cost of a US sea drone 2-3 million $. Oh joy...
@Steve33-c4o
4 ай бұрын
There’s no price on freedom 🚀🚀🚀🚀
@mcrick8931
29 күн бұрын
LOL
@Steve33-c4o
3 ай бұрын
Great reporting thanks for sharing!❤❤❤❤❤
@NotASeriousMoose
4 ай бұрын
This is more of an advert for defence contractors than anything else
@kenrdavis2266
4 ай бұрын
No it’s not! Are you a troll or an adversary? Talk like that is insane. Maybe US 🇺🇸 should disband the Military? Borders are open and inflation is growing. Guess we need not attempt defense else Contractors are blamed for promoting War? PATHETIC!
@efghggdxlmfn33
2 ай бұрын
Yemen in 3 days? The United States spent a billion dollars on the combat operations of its aircraft carrier squadron in the Red Sea, but lost the naval war to the Yemeni Navy. The Houthis' success rate is relatively low given the number of munitions deployed, but they have succeeded it hitting around 30 merchant ships. With traffic through the Red Sea having declined by about 60-70%, the inflationary impacts will be felt in the global economy. Western navies are really really concerned over the "high" number of munitions houthis use…especially when the western munitions in Cyprus are nearly exhausted after more than 6 months of trying to kill houthi children with multi million pound missiles.
@pikminlord343
Ай бұрын
Great bideo
@peripheral1258
4 ай бұрын
Letmegetthisright. Russia fires 20-30,000 shells Per Day and the US went into this mess producing only 14,000 shells per Month ? Half a day's supply. And it will only reach a three day supply/Month in Two Years ( while Russia will again have increased its production over that time). Meanwhile the Ukrainian ground forces advance WW1 style into this baffling barrage WITH NO AIR SUPPORT. 47:00 Humanitary Concerns ? Lets give Ukr. Cluster Munitions that drop indiscriminate landmines covering Donbas. eg: "Some 4 million to 6 million land mines and other unexploded munitions are estimated to have littered Cambodia's countryside" WSJ: Where is your Adult Assessment of the current US Administration ?
@efghggdxlmfn33
4 ай бұрын
Adult eating chocolate chip ice cream. Near the red button
@TB7-X
4 ай бұрын
I assume we believe our adversaries already knows about this tech, otherwise why are we advertising it?
@michaelandersonDTLA
2 ай бұрын
All the M-IC company reps look and sound like Don Draper.
@inzhener2007
4 ай бұрын
GLSDB missiles are counter measured by Russian jamming.
@oromtichaoromia1265
Ай бұрын
Its one of advanced sciencetific Military war machine achievements like star war movie come to realty ❤❤❤😍
@RuneRavn-vb3mt
4 ай бұрын
I am surprised that Russians do not know that Tuborg beer is a known Danish brand which is owned by Carlsberg.
@jeanmarcgomez1630
2 ай бұрын
After the Russian’s washing machine chips , here are the US ´s wacum cleaner ! 😂😂
@roderickflint1330
4 ай бұрын
Verry well done video. Easy to fallow
@jamesjross
4 ай бұрын
full of BS- GLSDB don't work... these are old statements from US Gov. they have since acknowledged it was rushed into service untested. We need to do better.
@andrewratshefola2438
4 ай бұрын
An interesting indeth of technological knowledge!
@richardcheese9429
4 ай бұрын
Basically, technology like drones, guided glide bombs, and constant surveillance capabilities means armour is useless now. It goes to show how hopeless it is for infantry and armoured personnel in a modern conflict. You are sitting ducks to people in computer rooms far away from the front lines. Nothing but meat shields.
@AbuHajarAlBugatti
4 ай бұрын
You obviously have no idea about landwarfare. Yeah go let a fpv destroy fortifications, deep trenches, bunkers, hold ground, occupy land, act in urban warfare
@NotUnymous
4 ай бұрын
As one need to take ground and secure advanced positions, tanks and Infanterie are still most important. But yes, there job just got tougher
@chasrmartel4777
4 ай бұрын
Why not use D5 on land? It can even be encapsulated in a sub tube and moved to different silos, maintenance yards and mobile deployment platforms.
@rickjames18
4 ай бұрын
The problem with GLSDB is that it was rushed into production and wasn't ready yet. Ukrainians have not used it much because they found that the Russians GPS jammers were taking it off course. They were missing and that is a problem. Russian EW is good despite having a horrible army in general.
@JohnDoe-iq9bz
4 ай бұрын
'Horrible army'? 😂😂😂 Now if you said horrible logistics then you would have a point. Russia's army is one of its strongest points. It's crazy that they've used conscripts and felons who have taken multiple cities. 80% of their army is still in the mainland. But I get it, you're a Russophobe who has to say negative things about Russia to make yourself feel better😃 I mean they've ran out of weapons and they're now using shovels too right? If only they fought against Vietnamese rice farmers maybe they would've done better😂
@websitemartian
4 ай бұрын
this war could EASILYbe ended.. but of course we have to continue blowing money we don't have..
@johannesfeigl5309
2 ай бұрын
Ocean arrow shame that it is not configured for peaceful assignments😮
@MinecraftRedOFFICAL
4 ай бұрын
Cool, 1 Hour of Taxpayer's Investment Presentation!
@UnCannyValley67
4 ай бұрын
Maybe you’d rather try icing in china or Ruzzia..?
@jamielancaster01
Ай бұрын
Remember, we’re sending Ukraine our old stuff and replacing that with new stuff to our own inventory.
@scarymonsterrs
4 ай бұрын
That's correct Iran, you get toy solar powered boats to combat your Navy 😂.
@floofy5529
4 ай бұрын
Iran’s entire navy was destroyed by the US after just 1 American ship was bombed. There’s nothing else to prove to them.
@jameslopez9661
4 ай бұрын
One hole will sink you
@churblefurbles
4 ай бұрын
@@jameslopez9661 will neutralize carriers as well, and who relies on expensive platforms is the question.
The MIC taking the concept of "cheap drones" and getting cost up to 3 million dollars is why the U.S. will get pantsed the moment it has to engage an actual peer in war lol.
@MedAventuras.
Ай бұрын
the Iskander missile that costs 3 million, awaits for you!
@stolly27
4 ай бұрын
3 to 4 million not expensive? what world is this guy living in?
@everettputerbaugh3996
3 ай бұрын
To 'future proof' the hardwired interconnect, I suggest horizontal drilling, leaving an armor casing and running the fiber/copper, then pressurize the segments for fault detection. Upgrades simply require removal / replacement of the data links. (No more real estate issues.)
@DiMa-pb7gy
4 ай бұрын
Meanwhile, Russia is dominating the battlefield with shovels and washing machines....
@nicolasolton
4 ай бұрын
Ok.👍
@quill444
4 ай бұрын
_Russia is now one twentieth of one percent larger than it was in 2022, and all it cost them is half a million lives, and the respect of most of the world._ 😨 ⚒ - j q t -
@DiMa-pb7gy
3 ай бұрын
@@quill444 get your facts straight...
@AbuHajarAlBugatti
4 ай бұрын
Booker is a joke. Meanwhile t90: 125 mm gun, active protection system, automatic loader: 46 tonnes
@daddyrabbit835
4 ай бұрын
And even those are getting whacked by FPV drones. The Booker is a waste of money. Just the M551 Sheridan recycled.
@richardhodges3593
2 ай бұрын
Whenever someone says somebody "doesn't want you to know", I switch off like all those ridiculous Chinese adverts selling junk.
@AbdiPianoChannel
Ай бұрын
Russia has the right to defend it self. American tanks only works in defenseless third countries.
@eliyahudbenperetz1615
4 ай бұрын
This is the same drone we see being tow by an Iranian small navy boat without nobody doing nothing about it.
@08yallvon
4 ай бұрын
Can the Trition escape fishermans net?
@stop116
4 ай бұрын
1. Russia is saying they will use nuclear weapons first if NATO countries attacks them directly 2. Putin is scared of NATO conventional superiority 3. Russia focuses more on Nukes Everyone knows - none of the sides wants to use nukes, because that exchange will kill all of us. Conventional weapons are defensive and offensive, while nukes are considered only as repellent (for enemy to think twice of gambling) Russia is showing weakness in conventional war and the West still call them aggressive? Conventional superiority is sign of aggression, while NUCLEAR THREAT is saying clear words - STEP BACK..
@yam2050
4 ай бұрын
Normies don't want to use nukes but leaders don't give a f a out it, they have their multi-million bunkers that can keep them alive for years if not decades.
@JAllenKaiser
4 ай бұрын
Good idea: Russian troops should step back into Russia. Claiming a neighboring country’s territory for your own is in no way “defensive.”
@firestorm8471
2 ай бұрын
Ukraine is proving Tanks to be obsolete. The Booker will be no different. If you wish for troops to have mobility, create long range electric Mountain Bikes.
@emeraldviking1919
3 ай бұрын
During the Iraq War, I suggested that we should have unmanned tanks that launch drones....
@timtrewyn453
4 ай бұрын
The M10 does not appear to be built to counter what will be its nemesis, the FPV drone. Back to the drawing board. The design requirement is not so much to move infantry forward as to move one's own FPV drone controllers forward through mined areas to bring more enemy targets into FPV range, which appears to generally exceed the effective range of a tank gun, and to provide protection for that crew through electronic and other counter measures to thwart the enemy's FPV drones and mines. Think of it as a sort of aircraft carrier on land. The unit could involve more vehicles as does a carrier task force. Many vehicles would be almost purely for defense against enemy drones. They could launch balloons or quiet gliders to acoustically acquire enemy drones. They could forward fire land-based, networked listening devices in a role similar to the sonobuoy. Land assault is now a smaller version of the carrier task force rather than battleships (tanks). The idea is for the number and variety of one's own drones and control points to outnumber the enemy drones and control points. Mechanized artillery is still relevant because its range generally exceeds drone range, the naval analogy being missiles launched out of VLS's.
@thebudman1980
4 ай бұрын
So in Ukraine the drone war is getting scary. The soldiers getting attacked by those drones don't always see them. Sometimes they go about their business and even looked right at the drone above there head and didn't even notice. Then when not having designated targets. They go out on hunts with drones 24x7. Day and night. Then the scary parts is seeing drones do circles soldiers trying to get away from and trying to hit with sticks. But the drone operator is toying with them because he could have already hit the button to kill him. Then goes in for the kill and target eliminated. Or other footage i seen where a guy hides from a drond behind a tree but doesn't see the drone behind him. Other things i seen on different media is how they also use land drones to go bomb them in foxholes or land drones to sometimes recover aircraft drones by hooking up and hauling them back. Ukraine is a lot more experienced with the smaller civilian sized drones for combat than we are. Then add Russia is always on the hunt for drones. You sometimes hear them but can't pinpoint exactly where they are and you hope they don't see you. Other things i seen is that sometimes when Ukraine launches drones into Russia then they get jammed. Keep going and then sometimes unjam after they are outside of jamming range and regain control. And if you see one drone there is usually several around. They fly in buildings with blown out windows or opened doors or blown out ealls and everything else to hit there targets such as men on foot. Oddly the drones have been fairly accurate and most of the time hitting their targets. I see at least one that managed to fly the drone in the tank hatch itself. I seen other footage where another drone swings around. Stops for a second then darts at a Russian tank and the turret blows off. Sometimes they are strapping old RPG style grenades to them for the tanks. Drone Still light enough to carry and blow up a Russian tank. They only need the explosive part of the rpg. When jammed they send more drones out while sitting in a bunker and keep trying. The video feed usually gets jammed first. They use one drone that not dji brand. That has the target tracking and stuff some consumer drones have. Usually they replace optics with better optics. Infrared or whatever. I been watching a lot of the journalist videos that came out recently. Like Darwin's war from scripps news. It's about Ukraine's ace fpv pilot. And several other journalist shows about drones on the front lines in Ukraine that all came out within the last month or 2. I forgot to add. When jammed they keep sending more out until successful. Then maybe the first few came up short but they only need one to make it to the target. So after a few drones or so they got the target despite the jamming.
@bikermaniac6002
4 ай бұрын
Russia just developed a “shotgun” adapter to hunt for drones, very effective. Is like shooting a duck.
@musehtaicho
4 ай бұрын
>Oddly the drones have been fairly accurate and most of the time hitting their targets. Because you see only succesfull strikes? Even if 90 out of 100 are jammed/missed/downed you'll see 10 videos and say "wow, all of them reached targets".
@DouglasHarper-cn4ur
3 ай бұрын
Beautiful bud, what method were you using, couldn't tell by the video fly lure or bait?👍
@grsafran
4 ай бұрын
Blaa,blaa,blaa. Heard this a hundreds of times, still waiting?
@AlexanderKunis
4 ай бұрын
Such big muscles and such small faded brain that commands all this power.
@IMP-vi6je
4 ай бұрын
what got them to the middle east? that doesn't sound like American waters at all
@vitalys9986
4 ай бұрын
Why was US military drone operating near Iran? US is half of the world away.
@ekimstrongcup6029
4 ай бұрын
Cause The US can be any where.
@JAllenKaiser
4 ай бұрын
Protecting shipping from Somali pirates and Houthi rebels.
@samnangthim6949
4 ай бұрын
On a flat sea maybe, in any kind of weather it would immediately get swamped. A rubber duck with an imposing name.
@ishouldbesleeping1354
4 ай бұрын
ALL U.S. weapons need a “ self destruct function” upon capture; A Mission Impossible trip switch🤯
@DavidGreg-wg3od
2 ай бұрын
I pray to God to give you a lot of beautiful days and you know God loves us so much,So where are you originally from? I am David originally from Spain but currently living.
@TedApelt
4 ай бұрын
I thought I would never see a solar powered submarine. I was wrong.
@andyf4292
4 ай бұрын
for the effect of a nuke underwater- check out operation crossroads baker shot
@piotrd.4850
2 ай бұрын
Nuclear detonation underwater doesn't create tsunami per se. On the other hand if it tiggers massive underwater landslide and displacement .... well. But that severly limits targeting options and is hardly precise or reliable.
@Aut251
4 ай бұрын
Ideal for gas pipe lines under the sea. Specs on this thing are mine blowing 😂
@mcknight3483
4 ай бұрын
So does this mean that the stryker failed when they have a variant of a 105 mm canon? The makers of the booker are thinking of a war way back in the Gulf War. Havent they learned anything in the ukraine-russia war?
@theemissary1313
4 ай бұрын
Can we all agree that in the current age, nuclear bombers are effectively obsolete compared to the the other options? Bombers capable of delivering nuclear weapons on the other hand are extremely effective with more conventional bombs and missiles. Just not for dropping a nuclear weapon.
@JeremiLewis-sg9qt
4 ай бұрын
That dude pal like a vampire
@davidstrother8726
3 ай бұрын
Let’s talk about how much these cruises missiles cost. 1-2 million missile. And the chain gun $15,000 a minute..
@fattuesday33
2 ай бұрын
TOS1A Thermobaric is illegal to use in civilian areas? NATO used thermobarics to destroy at least one Libyan city. Blew the walls right off high rise apartments and cooked everyone inside.
@lbeautybyrva9934
4 ай бұрын
We need to focus our energy and attention towards more force field shields in the Battlefield.
@arminius6506
4 ай бұрын
Try building affordable housing, cars and healthcare system first you coolies
@andyf4292
4 ай бұрын
Thunderfoot did a video on the Thermobaric weapons,, if you are in the area where the oxygen is depleted, you are also in the lethal blast radius.
@dennispfeifer7788
4 ай бұрын
The Booker won't last 5 minutes on the battlefield in the age of cheap kamikaze drones...it's like a sitting duck on the water.
@ishamelhenry3521
3 ай бұрын
I am not surprised 2 million US dollars is a huge amount of money. The Chinese PLA can also build this for $10,000.
@IceBox666theone666
4 ай бұрын
Regarding the booker Tank platform. Good idea compared with a Abrams but was not the STRIKER system invisioned to do that job what now is planed for the Booker? What happened to the STRIKER project?
@Mikkall
4 ай бұрын
The M-10 "Booger". I did that!
@kinngrimm
4 ай бұрын
Any chance we can get helmets that protect from the effects of thermobaric weapons?
@pogo1140
4 ай бұрын
You need a full suit, like battle armor used in Battletech/Mechwarrior
@kinngrimm
4 ай бұрын
@@pogo1140 i am not convinced that is necessary to avoid the worst here described effects and i don't mean necessarily the initial explosion phase. Helmet with its own flexible O2, that would be activated when a rappid pressure change occurs or when manual activaded in case of biological or chemical threats. Similar to a airback system, just then creating airtightness around the neck.
@pogo1140
4 ай бұрын
@@kinngrimm It has to withstand the compression, heat, vacuum, the supersonic debris from the explosion
@kinngrimm
4 ай бұрын
@pogo1140 i guess there might be safty limits, but could one produce *sufficient* counterpressure within the helmet? Not necessarily equal to the outside, but enough to soften the blow and prevent fatalities. Biggest issue i thought would be to create an airtight area around the neck at least for a short time, indefinetly ofcause could be better, but for the duration of such an attack would at least prevent the worst there then. Gels put under pressure,chemical quick foam for one time use, something like that. The supersonic debris, there a full body armor might be needed indeed, but how far away are we with current moddels that are reinforcing vital areas? Weight is also a constant concern if you don't want an exoskellets that need motors/actuators.
@Herm.Q-92
4 ай бұрын
@@pogo1140, a MJOLNIR armor comparable suit would be about the only thing that would have a chance of withstanding that impact and that doesn’t exist in our current day & age/reality for that matter:
@Editsdevil
4 ай бұрын
I like the boat drones It is a good game Changer in ocean You can deploy 1000 with your fleet Marvelous engineering 😮
@DUBSTEP_KUSH305
3 ай бұрын
Dont forget to just look up into the SKY 😅
@anders1621
4 ай бұрын
Russian Vacuum boms are bad when they use it. But israel and the US will use white phosphorus with impunity in residential areas when ever they see fit. The hypocracy these days is insane
@Vsor
4 ай бұрын
No it's not a light tank. Its just a light weight tank made for airlift, and infantry support... like light tanks.
@slavaslava4821
4 ай бұрын
1:13:14 - Man In Black hero.
@MyAcer20
4 ай бұрын
if there is a turret toss as direct result of something exlpoding the ammo the crew is instantly dead not a maybe
@kensaiix
4 ай бұрын
not all tanks are hit critically while driving or engaging, it is at last a possibility that the crew abandons the vehicle for other reasons (e.g. tack fails), before the kill-shot is carried out. but yes, generally you are correct.
@dejanradenkovic6335
2 ай бұрын
Отправьте его в Украину посмотреть, как он обращается с ланцетом.😂
@jimbo92107
4 ай бұрын
Journalist: "Will the Triton be weaponized?" Company rep: "That depends what the customer wants to do..." Me: Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
@luckyguy600
Ай бұрын
crayon delivery system to the Russian front-line troops.
@kabaduck
4 ай бұрын
Mistake in this video, these DDGs and CG's with the aegis radar system in combat center can actually use the weapon systems on other ships as well
Пікірлер: 1,1 М.