The Prigogzhin pictures are some of my favorites this year, top notch comedy.
@Trollge398
Жыл бұрын
Prigogzhin is immortal through memes
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
I'm from Brazil. Here the response has been mixed. Some people seem worried that we might lose influence within Brics, and also some worry about China's influence gain inside the block, or think that it's mostly symbolic (other than the bank); however most people think closer relations with China and India are positive and deepening ties with them (and Asia as the engine of global growth and our trade) is a bit of a consensus. Most people think being a Brics member boosts our international standing and bargaining power with the west too, as we try to be neutral overall (similar position to Indonesia and India). Some other people think the expansion was good because it adds important oil producers which means a greater possibility to reduce dollar dependency, but this absolute need to diversify away from the dollar is less consensual.
@josephstalin6647
Жыл бұрын
@@RobespierreThePoof these days democracy and freedumb means the freedumb to be a degenerate homosexual transgender child groomer
@ShinigamiInuyasha777
Жыл бұрын
@@RobespierreThePoof Honestly. Are you some kind of professional fool? The pro dictatorship clown of Bolsonaro was a puppet of the US. Everyone and their mother knows that!
@blugaledoh2669
Жыл бұрын
@@RobespierreThePoofautocracy at home? You mean lula
@ac1455
Жыл бұрын
@@RobespierreThePoofFrom what I’ve seen of China’s moves, China is basically “don’t care if you’re a democracy, autocracy, theocracy, monarchy, just as long as you trade and maintain friendly relations with us and not try to meddle in our perceived territorial bounds”. By itself, this mindset is not a big concern, but of course this leads to problems when territorial bounds overlap/are disputed such as in the South China Sea, Senkaku island dispute, Kashmir dispute, HK’s degree of autonomy, and of course Taiwan. It’s interesting how almost all of these disputes and aggressions of China, besides Kashmir issue, can be boiled down to a large part protecting trade routes in case of sanctions. In the same way the US, UK, and NATO in general has de facto control over the Panama Canal, the strait of Gibraltar, the strait of Hormuz, the Baltic Sea, the gulf of Finland, the Bosporus Strait, etc., China is attempting to establish control over the Malacca Strait and Strait of Taiwan.
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
@@RobespierreThePoof I think you are seeing an opposition where there isn't one. Historically (and even recently) it's the US which has supported anti-democratic regime change in Brazil, if we are honest. Bolsonaro himself was a close ally of Trump and his attacks on democracy emulate this american far right now bering exported globally. Overall the biggest threat to Brazilian democracy, I think, as seen in other countries, is economic backwardness which would come from not using the chance to develop presented by a rising Asia. The idea that conections to China are more harmful than others, to me, is rather rooted in a misunderstanding of the real consequences of historic western hegemony in this part of the world. China presenting itself as an alternative to the west is, in my view and that of many, a good, regardless of whether we have disagreement in some values (which we also do with the west at times), because it increases our space to develop ourselves, prosper, and fulfill our own visions without being a forever colony which gets a coup d'état when someone overseas decides democracy here isn't going quite as they like. Even if it is in a bipolar order, China's rise is a net positive. And no, I disagree with you that many people don't object to the idea of a multipolar world. People in the west do, especially the US (and according to you in China as well), both explicitly and tacitly, when they understand it means other people's projects thriving and not necessarily being their own. A multipolar order isn't achieved by charitable concessions from the hegemonic powers, but by the ascendency of new powers which demand it, both relative to the west and to China.
@kron520
Жыл бұрын
3:48 The most surprising thing is that Xi is the tallest.
@apoploe
Жыл бұрын
I have read "In search of Soviet gold" by John D. Littlepage (American engineer who was employed by Soviet government) and found this book EXTREMELY interesting. I recommend you to make a video or series of video based on this book. This topic is literally a goldmine in both senses ;-)
@DS.J
Жыл бұрын
Doesn't mean much, since interests of all of those countries are too diverse and incompatible.
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
It means something if they manage to build consensus in key areas of mutual interest, such as trade (in a currency other than the usd) and financing development. Nobody should expect it to become a geopolitical block, and I think reading brics from that light is wrong. That's why they say it's not an alternative to the G7 (because it really isn't). I don't think the countries are "incompatible" at all, and we should hope not, otherwise that means there'd be a war
@DS.J
Жыл бұрын
@@FOLIPEHighly unlikely. For example, by far the largest trading partners of China are EU, US and Japan, not BRICS countries. In fact, Germany alone counts as a more significant trading partner for China than the rest of the BRICS combined. So no, there won't be any 'consensus' on that within BRICS simply because it's not BRICS that will decide that. Same story with India.
@saucy743
Жыл бұрын
@@DS.J Yet if the EU, US and Japan stop trading with China, China won't collapse. If Russia stops, China is dead. Why? Cheap sh!tty T-shirts and huawei phones don't come even close to the level of Oil and Gas. The former is in the hands of EU, US and Japan, the latter is in Russia's hands.
@sisyphusvasilias3943
Жыл бұрын
They all benefit from stronger trade and financial partnerships with each other and PRIMARLY they all benefit by developing alternative International Trade/Financial Infrastructure to US Controlled institutions. It doesnt make them hostile to the US led West but it gives them leverage in negotiations with the West and provides them security from the threat of Unilateral US sanctions. All BRICS members values these benefits.
@adopodrinje1499
Жыл бұрын
not 36% but 46% of world gdp now! or even 48% ! IT IS GROWING!
@brianyang5075
11 ай бұрын
China makes up 18 trillion gdp while the rest of brics 8 trillion gdp in 2022.
@stekra3159
Жыл бұрын
The Status Quo Coalition will not end as long as Europe and the US have each other. And with the US EU and APC we have more then 50% of global GDP.
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
What's APC and how is it relevant?
@waffleonquaffle
Жыл бұрын
@@FOLIPE my guess would be Asia-Pacific Countries, so something like Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand
@aznluvr7
Жыл бұрын
Short answer, nothing.
@jpaulc441
Жыл бұрын
Most of those countries don't have much in common other than "We're not the West". If they succeed in their goals, they will probably start to fracture as time goes on maybe reforming into new blocs.
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
The BRICS isn't a block in order to oppose the west, though, it's more of a forum in which to build alternatives to current options in several things, from trade to finance. You don't have to agree on everything to do that, and it is only perceived as "anti-west" because it (naturally but almost as a second thought) breaks western hegemony
@Nobody-Nowhere
Жыл бұрын
If they succeed in their goals, they have found mutually beneficial ways of interacting. The whole point is not to be a homogenous block like the west is, its not an imperial project.
@runajain5773
Жыл бұрын
@@Nobody-Nowhereyeh it not nato it just financial forum also there is allience answer is impossible because india and china have already dispute
@xsc1000
Жыл бұрын
And in fact Russia needs BRICS just to lie itself longer because it is needed for Putins ego...
@sisyphusvasilias3943
Жыл бұрын
You're missing the point of Multipolarism which respects competition and competing interests. Multipolarism is opposed to Supernational Blocs like EU/NATO/G7 and the West/East Blocs of Cold War. Instead Individual Sovereign nations are Primary. There are often disagreements and failed attempts to pass co-operative trade deals because of conflicting interests between BRICS members. That's fine. BRICS just wants these competitions to be carried out in Diplomatic Forums and NOT via Trade Wars of REAL WARS.
@szariq7338
Жыл бұрын
You know, that I'm a bit interested in what did Soviet and today's Russia gun laws look like? As well as the overall population's stance on their ownership in Russia and what influenced it the most, as it's really weird, that Poland, despite the plagues, that hit us (partitions, both world wars, communism and recent rising tensions) and with relatively liberal laws compared to the world there's so little issued permits and registered firearms. I want to see, what happened, that we're so disarmed (however I bet it was due to communist harsh laws, that were basically issued only to trusted men of the party and for illegal possesion the owner of such device could himself receive a bullet to the head).
@Setarko
Жыл бұрын
I will make a video about gun ownership in the Soviet Union pretty soon (in a month or so), so stay tuned! It is a complex topic as there were many changes throughout the hitory
@Solaire_au_Frohmage
Жыл бұрын
The question is interesting, the anti-commie bias that permeates the whole comment is kind of cringy, imo.
@szariq7338
Жыл бұрын
@@Solaire_au_Frohmage We Poles feel harmed and scarred by the adoption of communism and shaped our mindset towards very negative view on government telling us orders, bans and general messing with our lives. But for some reason we don't really force the gov to liberalise our lives, it seems as if we just want law stability.
@rebralhunter6069
Жыл бұрын
@@Solaire_au_Frohmage how is it cringy if its true though? Poland didn't want communism, and it did an absolute number on the country. I fail to see how pointing that out is cringey.
@rebralhunter6069
Жыл бұрын
You mention Poland having liberal gun laws but very little ownership. Part of that is the fact that the liberalization of Polish gin laws is a pretty recent thing. It was only a few years ago that the barrier to entry was much harder. The gun owning "community" has been steadily growing these last few years. I don't know if you own guns yourself or not. But I can see the steady growth myself year on year.
@madfreacmocrazi6093
Жыл бұрын
Mad love from SA, probably the only brics member that has suffered the most from being a part of the block. But we still strive to never again be striped of our pride as Africans, the currency of our ancestors.
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
Why did SA suffer due to being a part of Brics?
@madfreacmocrazi6093
Жыл бұрын
@@FOLIPE SA's largest export market is the UK and EU and is a large advocate for non-alignment, I'm sure you can figure out the rest.
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
@@madfreacmocrazi6093SA's largest export market is China, UK is number 4, the EU combined maybe passes over China. Non-alignment should be the way to be able to keep all that trade intact, one would think
@madfreacmocrazi6093
Жыл бұрын
@@FOLIPE That is true in terms of value, however when it comes to volume the EU comes first, as SA trades agricultural, pharmaceutical, industrial and raw materials. Where in China it is mostly just raw materials, so for a stable economy SA relies more on the EU, UK and US than on brics
@josephstalin6647
Жыл бұрын
@@madfreacmocrazi6093 are you black south African or butthurt white south African mad you lost the colony?
@Luftwaffe1O1
Жыл бұрын
Nice vid man, couple comments id make, I think in light of what has happened, particularly with sanctions against Russia, and the adventures we've had in the middle east in the last 20 years, one cant really understate the need for a way for smaller developing countries to have some avenue to get access to funds outside of the western systems. The problem is the US doesnt have a live and let live philosophy, not that China and Russia do either, but they tend to be more hands off as long as you arent openly hostile. The US, is a bit different in this regard, and unfortunately the international organizations have more or less become kind of impotent are fall heavily within the soft power influence of the US. So in a world where the US can on a whim turn off the faucet, both for its own funding, but also any EU trading partners, or pretty much anything western backed, having somewhere to turn to as an alternative, regardless of how flimsy it may seem, is seen as a good opportunity to hedge your bets. I also wouldn't call the US predictable, with each new president, things swing wildly, the US can go from a friend to a foe in no time at all.
@arthas640
11 ай бұрын
China and Russia do much the same though, its just that they tend to change leaders less often. Remember Putins been in power for over 20 years and Xi for a similar stretch whereas the US has had 4 presidents in that time. Look at Russia though: tons of alliances were cut off when Yeltsin took over from Gorbachev, policies were radically changed, and the country changed a ton. When putin took power things changed radically again. Xi has changed China quiet a bit and seems much more hostile and belligerent but has also built new alliances; China was much different on the world stage under previous leaders. The US is also less radical then you think. Look at how JFK, LBJ, and Nixon were all keen to prop up south Vietnam and carryon on the Vietnam War, Look at how Eben when the presidency changed parties they still backed some of the same dictatorships like those in south Korea during the cold war, look at how Obama, Bush, and Trump both carried on the wars in the middle east.
@Brick-Life
Жыл бұрын
Awesome for more nations to join BRICS and share prosperity for the future!
@andrelee7081
Жыл бұрын
As an American, I think BRICS is important as a forum for developing countries without unnecessary input from the West. However, I continue to chafe against the idea that somehow we live in a unipolar world. The United States is incredibly selfish, ignorant, and focused on itself, but the paranoia that it experiences is no different from that of other "great powers" like China, India, or Russia; Americans very much want to just focus on themselves and have no reason to "take over the world." The fact that BRICS is allowed to form, loudly state that it openly defies the United States, and expand to such a degree without the US shutting it down, is proof that the world is not as "unipolar" as many believe.
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
We lived in an unipolar world between 1992 and maybe 2017. Not because the US was more paranoid, but because it was overwhelmingly stronger than everyone else and could (and did) do whatever it wanted, including but not restricted to invading countries with UN mandate
@qefewfwdcwdc
Жыл бұрын
@@FOLIPE LOL the alternative was vietnam war, cuba crisis aóne couoe after another because soviets could not stop influencing third world countries and supporting armed militias so the bad bad americans needed to teach them a lesson. good job you fookin knuckeldragger. how about yo shut the f up
@lopikosmusic9354
Жыл бұрын
USA can invade basically any country it wants, occupy it, even go against UN wishes, and they can do so with impunity. Any other non-NATO country in the world would be slapped with crippling sanctions the second they even thought about it.
@numinuecooper9975
Жыл бұрын
What do you mean by the United States didn't shut it down? This is the problem, the United States is another country just as every other country. Countries do not need permission from the United States to seek their best interest or to further a cause that'll bring development and prosperity to their countries. America didn't get to be powerful all of a sudden, she worked hard at it, this is why these countries are gathering themselves together to do in their countries interest and frankly no country needs anyone approval to develop. This is the main focus for the BRICS, to unite countries that felt as though they were being suppressed, to give them a push to thrive and become powerful as well.
@Rrgr5
Жыл бұрын
There is an interesting thing about BRICS (which I think should change the name pretty soon) and how it bounds their partners mostly because they could use it as a bargain, still a new organization so some steps will be taken in the long run, one thing is true, as long as it's presented as an alternative to the westerner option it will grow and one day it will need military ties, don't think it will work like NATO or anything like that just like the NDB isn't like the IMF, I think will be more of a logistical cooperation than boots on the ground and I don't even think either China or Russia will make a major part of this, mostly the other ones, since the similarities and gains will be greater, doesn't fits the narrative that it is a problem to the west, at least not now, is mostly a way to defend themselves from predatory practices from the west and eventually will need some military ties.
@steverobertson6393
Жыл бұрын
Well done Setarko! Thoughtful and balanced examination of a global phenomenon of increasing importance. As an American emigrating to Uruguay, where there is a New Development Bank office (if I'm not mistaken) and a neighbor to our cultural and ethnic cousins in Argentina, I have put my money where my mouth is. To anyone who disagrees with what is apparent but their personal bias won't allow them to see, imagine this: All nations are people on a desert island. Some produce raw materials (gather coconuts) some manufacture and farm (cooking and preparing fish they've caught) But what would the person who is America be doing? They would be eating all the produce of other nations and handing out little paper IOU's, all the while shouting orders and reminding everyone else on the island of how wrong they are with how they naturally think. That's the state of things. Just how long does that last? . . . Not forever. Love your work! Keep it up. With Love, Your ally in the Global South
@WissHH-
Жыл бұрын
Such childish and simplistic view lol And a straight wrong analogy. Try again
@steverobertson6393
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your reply. Could you point out where my argument falls flat, instead of a sweeping hand of dismissal? What would you say America's role is? Upholding the rules based order? Interesting that. Their rules. Are they still following those rules? Is the current president to be treated like the previous one or vice versa? Please, elaborate if you would. @@WissHH-
@WissHH-
Жыл бұрын
@@steverobertson6393 Argument? Elaborate? Do u even read yourself?
@steverobertson6393
Жыл бұрын
Apologies. I'm doing my best here. Not sure how exactly I can improve, but I'll give it a shot. Below please find a line of thinking you are likely more familiar with or at least communicated in a way you might understand. . . . You, like America, think you're the sh@t when ya ain't Nobody but you thinks you're cool or worthwhile Your country of America was awesome WAS awesome But, your limited vocabulary and inability to see your country's collapse- Yea. I'm not feeling it. You're a half-whit and think I take myself too seriously. I can't really reply to someone who thinks in conclusions and communicates those sweeping conclusion with two sentences. Let's agree that you stay poor in America And just pretend not to see us in the R.o.W. (oh, that means Rest of the World (the parts outside the United States)) Best of luck. Might I recommend moving off TikTok and picture books. I know it's scary at first, But eventually books with just words will become normal to you. Pinkie promise. Okay, Bye bye now. @@WissHH-
@johano-go
Жыл бұрын
A very sober assessment.
@jacobridle7151
Жыл бұрын
Babe wake up new setarko video dropped
@thkiwi1
Жыл бұрын
In about 5 years from now, BRICS will become the new world's leader So it's important to have several member countries from different parts of the world A good number would be 20 My suggestions for join the BRICS are: - Indonesia and Kazakhstan in Asia - Venezuela and Mexico in Latin America - Nigeria and Senegal n Africa - Serbia in Europe
@PitunghereTNOschizo100
11 ай бұрын
Well, it's complicated, internal of B.R.I.C.S itself had a conflict for too hurry registering. My country Indonesia wants to in but in my logical conclusion that would be questionable the Neutrality Movement. Even since they had free and active politics on foreign, ironically they needed time to decide. Considering Indonesians had between good and bad position, also more worse problems foreign involved can be imminent sometimes. In my opinion, Indonesia on a locked-frontion state, I mean if join NATO they suicide, if join the B.R.I.C.S pact also suicide.
@jameslawrie3807
Жыл бұрын
The flip side of this is how incredibly toxic and exploitative the existing world order is. The World Trade organisation and International Monetary Fund are both extensions of United States of America foreign and economic policy, both of which have a habit of being brutal, arbitrary and destructive. The chance to go into an economic forum that actually offers benefits rather than simply converting your country into a resource stockpile combined with a dumping ground for cheap products the US sources from somewhere else. This sort of rent-seeking behaviour has become so common people don't even comment on it any more.
@armchairwarrior963
Жыл бұрын
I wish they would make a real BRICS currency soon!
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
cope💀
@dogeboi1804
Жыл бұрын
Saudia Arabia and Egypt in a future formal alliance with Russia is huge
@slowman9794
Жыл бұрын
😂
@kameraldbahrul3432
Жыл бұрын
Hope multipolarism become true Peace achieved when big power agree to limit their influence and choose to cooperate Not when one superpower make law and other follow it
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
lol last time the world was multi polar 2 world wars happened because they all could not agree
@kameraldbahrul3432
Жыл бұрын
@@VegaTakeOver and ITS better to let one country to make law and enforce everything? Who gonna check them? How you sure all decision making is really fair Isnt in democracy says there is need check and balance but why not in world level?
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
because there has never been a time in history when such thing has happened and the only times in history that are seen as the good times is when 1 superpower makes the rules like The Roman empire, or the usa pre 9/11 for countries that were not aligned with the communist@@kameraldbahrul3432
@r2.b2
Жыл бұрын
@@VegaTakeOvera ww2 like situation exists for a lot of the global south. Ask the Afghans, the Iranis, the Sudanese...
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
those people are irrelevant and dont make the rules sorry bud@@r2.b2
@tanyaroberson9629
4 ай бұрын
Trump says as a boy, he said to his MIT "nuclear genius" uncle that no way would nuclear bombs ever happen. Bizarre because the Hiroshima atomic bomb was dropped in 1945 and Trump was born in 1946.
@N238E
Жыл бұрын
Where do I watch the full episode of Alex Jones on Russian TV?
@lima153330
Жыл бұрын
brazil is a major ally of the US, along with Saudi Arabia, and egypt.
@sisyphusvasilias3943
Жыл бұрын
Was/were.
@arthas640
11 ай бұрын
The rant about the US/west just deciding to remove a country and shove them into endless civil war is rather unfounded when you compare it to Russia and China. Russia for one has created virtual civil wars across the world, especially in some bordering countries, in order to keep them weak. Moldovia and Korea are shining examples. China has done much the same also with Korea keeping the belligerent Kims in power who threaten war wifh the south constantly. The US left aghanistan in the midst of a civil war but its literally the same war thats been raging since the Soviets created a puppet state and then assassinated its leader and invaded, and its a similar story in Iraq where the Soviet backed Saddam created mucb of the insurgencies by wagingba war om his own people, and when the US invaded he opened the armories and allowed soldiers to just run off with weapons in the hopes theyd wage a guerilla war on the US. Libya is an even worse example since Gaddafi was similarly soviet backed and Soviet armed and the US didnt start the civil war, it sparked during the Arab Spring and the US/west just striked at a few targets... something Russia has also been doing across Syria and other regions as well.
@obsidianjane4413
Жыл бұрын
"What Does It Mean?" Gonna need a new acronym...
@stekra3159
Жыл бұрын
Saim as the 8 postal new EU members the EU has massiv inferstucker and agricultural subsidies. Which will be a point of contention in Ukrains poress of Joining.
@SHGames97
Жыл бұрын
DUDE “ICE AIRBUSES” WAAHHAHAHWHA 😂🎉 Can you call up Putin & Xi so they change it to ICE AIRBUSES? PLEASE?! I promise it’s a good PR move & sounds so gangster. Imagine Xi or Modi stepping out of some blinged out aircraft (the ice airbuses) to go host the meeting of ICE AIRBUSES? Woah! That got me good 🤣 thanks idk if it’s because I woke up at 3 a.m. US time but I bet money that’s the funniest thing ever. Thanks bro!
@торговыйфлот-м1ш
Жыл бұрын
That's what she said
@noheroespublishing1907
Жыл бұрын
New Economic Bank It's a little funny that it's the same acronym as the science fiction New Economic Block N.E.B.
@Huy-G-Le
Жыл бұрын
Its mean the economy is booming and people nows will haves more economic choices. Also you knowledge of Soviet Union is coming from the like of Yeltsin, boooooo.
@felineboy1586
Жыл бұрын
My favourite boy
@Rabbi-Jill-kews
Жыл бұрын
Damn was actually just thinking about you, no homo
@juanDE1703
Жыл бұрын
Hahahah OMG its so big...that reference.
@forsis80
Жыл бұрын
Russia can prosper a lot from BRICS+, in Africa "the west" have done such a bad job from the start, that makes it much more easy for Russia. To me looking at history, there is so much that NATO/ USA has done to the world that i'm shameful off. That can work in Russians advantage long term. There is so much in this world i don't like, but i can't do a damn thing about it.
@xsc1000
Жыл бұрын
You just dont remember what there did USSR? :-)
@forsis80
Жыл бұрын
@@xsc1000 In Africa? Tell me about the wars they entered please.
@xsc1000
Жыл бұрын
@@forsis80 Egypt, Lybia, Angola, Mosambic, Ethiopia. They didnt entered directly, they used either puppet socialistic/communist parties or used soldiers from other countries like Cuba.
@Aguila_Azteca_1810
Жыл бұрын
No solo en africa, Estados unidos y europa ha hecho mucho daño a America latina, africa y asia, la mayoria de europeos y americanos no lo saben porque no estudian su historia y prefieren vivir en su burbuja.
@forsis80
Жыл бұрын
Let me hear whats you take on Belgium under Leopold? Sweet huh? France plundering and colonize multiple counties so cozy, The US openly supported Rwanda no it was covertly.. why? Ahh Libya, the totally humanitarian job they did with Gaddafi just for not wanting the dollar but their own Dinar, they really built it back better with blacks in chains again, i missed that, think the whole world did it too (sarcasm) . The most developed country on the continent to one of the worst. Good job man! kzitem.info/news/bejne/rZep2HhsjIycjaA Oh the "internasjonal" NGO's who is the biggest economic contributor? ahh the USA you say? Ducking ell. They are so humanitarian. Its like they love you so much they could strangle you to death with interest on the IMF loans, but not be sorry you got some good weaponry from the US. Sorry you lost your family but we need our money or we gonna take your gold, Uranium or what ever you got. But seriously, im European, and if we say we are morally superior, youll better do a moral and just work, not just lie steal and arm who ever you like. Dead children don't care about geopolitics. Wars are banker profits and all people loose. WHO really? where have you been under Covid?
@thkiwi1
Жыл бұрын
The BRICS still doesn't have many formal rules But they will create those rules on each summit, making the group stronger and stronger every year For example, now the BRICS members are already working together to end the dominance of the dollar Very soon they will start working together on free trade Then on a common currency Then on a military alliance And so on Russia cannot trust Europe anymore, as the Europeans became slaves of the USA So the best thing is to forget Europe and go full power on BRICS
@xsc1000
Жыл бұрын
Funny brainwashed man :-)
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
💀💀 he really believes this
@stekra3159
Жыл бұрын
Will the goverment survie the war?
@Solaire_au_Frohmage
Жыл бұрын
It would be bad for the West if it didn't, as the current one actively impedes RF's growth and funds western economies.
@jedimindtricksa
Жыл бұрын
Wow, you said what no one is allowed to say without scrutiny in the west, from my perspective, Russia got bullied to long for losing by a horrible winner
@RT-qd8yl
Жыл бұрын
I wouldn't expect much... And what you will get will be "cha bu duo" to the extreme. If anything, we're looking at the formation of the WWIII Axis powers
@FOLIPE
Жыл бұрын
I don't think it is axiss of anything, after all, this is not a military alliance.
@ShinigamiInuyasha777
Жыл бұрын
Yeah. Becaue the europeans and the US are definetly not imperial genocidal powers😂
@ShinigamiInuyasha777
Жыл бұрын
@@RobespierreThePoof You mean that i said the US is NOT an imperialist genocidal power was a joke. Then yes. Thats the joke
@Aguila_Azteca_1810
Жыл бұрын
Tranquilo amigo, no tan rapido, no dejes que tu cerebro propagandizado se adelante a hacer declaraciones tontas.
@Solaire_au_Frohmage
Жыл бұрын
Axis powers live on as NATO, why would there need to be a second bloc?
@dogeboi1804
Жыл бұрын
The G20 in Indonesia is barely talked about here in the west, but if you look about it, when the USA and Europe talked about the issue of Ukraine, no one really cared about it, with the host even saying that the G20 should focus on problems of the world, not problems of a specific block.
@r2.b2
Жыл бұрын
Wasn't the g20 in India this year?
@dogeboi1804
11 ай бұрын
@@r2.b2 no in Indonesioa, Bali
@rotor7726
Жыл бұрын
What scares me about the idea of a truly multipolar world is that it'd almost certainly lead to a horrible war. Once it looks like the established powers can be challenged, the newcomers will want to oust them and the establishment will want to stamp down on the newcomers. This is pretty much what led to WW1.
@runajain5773
Жыл бұрын
But one superpower rule over same thing like if country digree so superpower and their allies will destroy their country
@sisyphusvasilias3943
Жыл бұрын
As opposed to the endless proxy and regime change wars waged by USA/NATO since the cold war AKA "Pax Americana"
@korayven9255
Жыл бұрын
@@runajain5773 It's really, *REALLY* not and everyone who thinks this is a good idea assumes they'll be one of the poles and they're probably idiots for thinking that way. I live in SEA and we've been living in the closest thing to a multipolar world for a couple decades now and let me tell you we do not want it. There's a reason why practically everyone in the region collectively decided to just go back to the previous unipolar superpower.
@qefewfwdcwdc
Жыл бұрын
LMAO give me a list you little bhc, lets verbally r a pe your BRIC a ss@@sisyphusvasilias3943
@WissHH-
Жыл бұрын
@@sisyphusvasilias3943literally yes, in perspective and comparing It with before It has been one of the more peaceful decades of human history. Do u really expect zero wars? Just read about It.
@npc2153
Жыл бұрын
If china russia Brazil stop trading for the USD and just trade in some bricks how is that going to help them by cutting off over half there trade. To prop up trading to eachother which they are already doing. "Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake." But I have to ask. Does anyone really believe cutting off trade with the people who have most the money is going to help their economies?
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
brics aint shit is not gonna "DEFEAT THE WEST" like these coping tankies think it is
@germanshepherd6638
Жыл бұрын
Brics vs nafta
@sisyphusvasilias3943
Жыл бұрын
completely different. One is a diplomatic forum and zero obligations, the other is a multilateral economic trade bloc that massively intergrates and standardizes the trading institutions and regulations of member nations.
@SHGames97
Жыл бұрын
As a super patriotic American who would be more than happy to keep the Unipolar status quo. I must admit it hasn’t been a Unipolar world since the day Xi of China came to power. Every year since then it has changed more & more. I mean China brokered a peace deal between a major American ally & one of Americas “adversaries” which in my view is a superpower move. China also dominates the South China Sea (it’s unfortunate but true) which is a super power move, you know, unquestioned military escapades no one else wanted. Super power move, wonder where they learned that from? So what mean, maybe it’s working brics or ice airbuses. Tho without the worlds other prominent super power, China, how do we see brics? Could it create a tripolar world? Could it be quadpolar one die? (IE- Brics pole one. China alone pole two. NATO pole three. USA alone pole four?) I guess I forgot EU but would anyone consider that a super power? Genuinely curious what others think or have to say about it! It’s real hard to hate any countries rise, so to the Brics countries, hell yea!
@jswizzlestick
Жыл бұрын
As an American who leans slightly pro interventionist (though generally against occupying any other country), I do continue to believe that rising economies is a tide that lifts many boats. Militarily, I'm mostly not afraid of the threat China poses to the US directly as while it can project power into the south China sea, that's still a long way off from the capabilities the U.S. and it's allies posses. It is slightly terrifying that the home of TSMC (Taiwan), which manufactures most of the worlds advanced chips (especially those used for AI research) is in Chinas direct line of sight. Defense of Taiwan needs to be the number one priority of the US military.
@r2.b2
Жыл бұрын
As an Asian, we don't really think of the EU or the UK as a major power or a threat. A quaint vacation destination, really. The USA is another matter...I don't think China is in its league, yet.
@gohanssj48
Жыл бұрын
I think Russians have the same problems with us Brazilians, at least pre-Special Operation: more attachment to the West, and not much to trade anyway. We can buy wheat from Argentina, oil from lots of countries, we produce lots of metals, etc. There's not much of manufacturing that we could trade, outside military hardware. Insofar, Brazil is in a bad shape. Low Growth, High Debt. I don't think we could make a New World Order even if we .wanted.
@mariaborboleta7537
Жыл бұрын
When you write special operation,you mean WAR,right?
@neeqee
Жыл бұрын
Strong feeling that the channel's author is not Russian at all but Ukrainian. The guy see no positives in Russia while there are a lot of those. Stereotypical "facts" and nothing more, every video is aimed to show as much negative as possible. Real Russia is far more different from what the dude tries to show
@Setarko
Жыл бұрын
Хрюкнуть?
@TheFuryKnight
Жыл бұрын
Personal i think Russian are asians because they live in asia.you guys maybe related to European and general favour european tradition and secondly that pig profile doesn't look great tbh.but this is your channel you will. And brics who knows all be care about our need neitherless to say. That's what matters food on the table at the end of the day.
@xsc1000
Жыл бұрын
Most of the russian population live in Europe....
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
ASIAN COPE 💀💀 lil bro though russia actually likes asia 💀💀
@TheFuryKnight
Жыл бұрын
@@VegaTakeOver your intelligence something to be seen here. I'm quite impressed to know that someone knows quite a lot of geography.
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
cope and seethe with your "Wussia 🥺👉👈 pls side wif us asians pwease your actually from asia not da west" HAHAHAH fucking dork keep crying BRICS wont save you and the west wont fall 🤣@@TheFuryKnight
@ranjitbiswas2835
4 ай бұрын
American and knows geography?
@VegaTakeOver
Жыл бұрын
MORE BRICS COPE 💀💀💀
@ranjitbiswas2835
4 ай бұрын
Russia is also developing country.lol
@wat-ch
Жыл бұрын
Personally I would describe BRICS as a sort of Discord group chat. It is simply a platform for exclusive members of the countries to chat about anything in the forum which all its exclusive members keen on discussing about. It's basically similar with ASEAN, but ASEAN has its own established charter which states non-interference with each member states. It was not a military alliance (even remotely), kind of an economic alliance but not exclusively, and politically did serve as a political bloc to China's South China Sea claims until Cambodia sort of bailed, so in a way ASEAN was sort of for show but did come into use for some practical purposes such as nuclear-free zone. In a way BRICS, and whatever name they will use after admission of the other countries applying will be free to do whatever they want, a military alliance, economic alliance, social alliance, tech etc. No charter means no obligation, no laws and no limitations. That will be quite problematic in forming any sort of cohesion, but I think that's what makes it attractive to applying countries. No forced decision, and all the benefits from BRICS. "They're freeing visa from all member countries? I'm joining too. They're changing the USB standards? I think I'll pass." BRICS alone needs to deal with China-India border conflict, country's differing standards militarily, radically different geopolitical issues, physically large distances and culturally isolated from each other. Their advantage however can also be made from the same issues. Large oil producers and oil consumers in one forum, large population counts, members free to pursue their ambitions with countries outside BRICS, large territory with plenty of resources and eternally diverse social ties for tourism. Don't forget that if added, Iran and Saudi Arabia may also use BRICS+ to also serve its OPEC+ ambitions if it did not already did beforehand.
@Silver_Prussian
Жыл бұрын
Having quite a of freedom to operate without being strangled by certain dumb rules is appealing yes but, such things like the new development bank, the payment system, the contingency strategic reserve is what draws countries.
@arthas640
11 ай бұрын
It reminds me a bit of the Axis. They're a group of countries with some somewhat similar goals and are attempting to have an economic block but they're so disunited and so physically separated and so divided polticially that they're more of an amorphous blob of somewhat connected countries. Similar to the axis Russia (the Japan of the group) started a war that screwed everything up.
@wat-ch
11 ай бұрын
@@arthas640 Personally I would say some fundamental things differentiate them from Axis really. Firstly, they were formed to "counter Bolshevism" which were so focused on Soviet Union politically as well as militarily and not much else economically. BRICS on the other hand were technically even less relevant politically since they seem to mostly allow each regional powers to meet for some weird coordination on international stage. Politics of both India and China as example were obviously different so my guess is that they would not touch politics in BRICS conference. I imagine BRICS to be like G7, but unlike G7 they would not talk about politics but mostly economies or culture. As for Russia starting a war that screw everything up, the West has been calling almost every single war Russia starts or later involved as screwing everything up, even if its true or false in a sense. At this point Russia doesn't even care what the West says except if the West is ready to make any sort of deal with Russia. I mean even now, the West still trades with Russia just like in Soviet times. Not trading directly? Money is still money, directly or indirectly. I don't think BRICS will ever be significant militarily, since even the assault rifle ammunition choices of each country are already different. They would be significant however, economically. Either way, sorry for the damn long reply.
@PitunghereTNOschizo100
11 ай бұрын
Welp BRICS and NATO itself will go blunder. I mean after all everyone sometimes also had tension on internally. While my state itself also going to blunder faction due fact that Indonesia is a locked faction. So joining a pact between NATO or BRICS would be suicide.
@wat-ch
11 ай бұрын
@@PitunghereTNOschizo100 BRICS = Equivalent of G7, G20, Belt and Road, North American Free Trade Agreement, European Union, ASEAN (partially). NATO = Equivalent of Tripartite Pact (Axis), Triple Entente, Warsaw Pact, Triple Alliance, CSTO, Sahel Alliance. Indonesia joining BRICS wouldn't be suicidal, joining NATO would. BRICS fulfils its use in times of peace and war. NATO fulfils its use in case of war.
@HEKVT
Жыл бұрын
Probably means nothing in the long run.
@Trollge398
Жыл бұрын
BRICS is aiding China BRI initiative
@EspHack
Жыл бұрын
voluntarism is how you either get a nothingburger or an unstoppable force. whereas rules form around... hmm, rulers, unequal relationships
@RI-go5zl
Жыл бұрын
All this talk about a unipolar world is about the competition between nations. And the competition between nations on earth is like the competition between individual people from the same nation: some are winners, some are losers, and there is nothing weird about this if the rules are the same for everybody. Let's take women skating: Russia seems to dominate that competition by far. Do we hear USA complaining about a unipolar world there, with often the gold, silver and bronze medal being often taken by Russia ? No, except if there was some cheating ! So here is my proposal: not a multipolar world, but an equal opportunity (i.e.: fair play) world ! May the best win ! If Russia dreams to have Moscow at the center of the world, let them prove that they can win fairly and squarely on the economic arena, the social arena, you name it ! It seems to me that Russia behaves like a contender to the world chess championship who has been badly defeated by the challenger: China. In the last thirty years it went from having a GDP equal to that of China to having 1/10 of it ! So move on, accept the reality, stop living in the past, and let China play the final with the world leader, which currently is USA. It's as if a hockey team that has not even managed to qualify in the NHL had a problem with the Vegas Golden Knights who won the Stanley Cup last year: Hello, please qualify to the NHL first and then make it to the playoffs. Then dream about the Stanley Cup !
Пікірлер: 188