Welcome to the new series on Bible contradictions. I'll be focusing more on Bart Ehrman than Sheik Ketchup Bottle going forward.
@JordanBrown-km5kf
Ай бұрын
Oh no, not the Muslim prophet, Bart Ehrman. :P
@SRose-vp6ew
Ай бұрын
Chronicle says he has 4000 places for horses built, but way more riders, first king says he bought way more horses, it’s not that confusing. I think if you read both scriptures and then really pause, and then you guide the person into the truth, they are more likely to see their error and how they were manipulated. It’s important to understand that when scripture was copied it was checked more times than you can imagine and there was ceremonial bathing involved and checks and rechecks, not to mention prayer.
@UltriLeginaXI
Ай бұрын
What does it mean for the Bible to be "inspired by God"
@TestifyApologetics
Ай бұрын
@@UltriLeginaXII believe God shared his insights with chosen messengers (apostles and prophets), who then wrote them down in their own words. So, different wording could express the same divine message. It's the meaning behind the words, not the words themselves, that are inspired by God. This makes sense to me because it seems more personal and relatable than God simply dictating every word. Of course, there are exceptions where God did dictate specific words, like the Ten Commandments. But for most of the Bible, I think it's about the underlying meaning and message.
@darkwolf7740
Ай бұрын
"Sheik Ketchup Bottle" is iconic
@tymon1928
Ай бұрын
Bible : contains minor scribe errors Quran: contains major doctrinal alternations
@Zvpada
Ай бұрын
@@tymon1928 The sun set in a muddy spring? 🥱
@JesusisKing-b4j
Ай бұрын
@@Zvpada huh?
@Zvpada
Ай бұрын
@@JesusisKing-b4j That’s what The Quran says
@JesusisKing-b4j
Ай бұрын
@@Zvpada what’s the context behind it
@Zvpada
Ай бұрын
@@JesusisKing-b4j That the sun set in a muddy spring of water
@BeingChristLike
Ай бұрын
I like the depiction of Muhammad having red eyes. He was either incredibly high, or demonically possessed. True
@TestifyApologetics
Ай бұрын
he is the og coomer wojak
@aaronsworld2338
Ай бұрын
He definitely liked eating expired grape juice a lil to much
@Russell_Westbrick
Ай бұрын
@@TestifyApologeticsbro💀
@benramsey1284
Ай бұрын
@@TestifyApologetics whatever that means. Real.
@glennjoshuamangabat2750
Ай бұрын
Even how he got his revelations is suspect. He went into a cave, an angel showed up, squeezed him, and he ran away and he wanted to end it because he thought he was demon possessed. Unlike in the Bible everytime an angel appears, “do not be afraid” is the first thing they say.
@ChristOverAllJeremy
Ай бұрын
“Oh my gosh, he was actually 18 instead of 8? I guess I’ll stop believing in the historical evidences, apostolic churches, multiple church councils, Pre-Christian Dead Sea scrolls, 5000 Greek manuscripts, and the Gregorian calendar.” Said no one ever.
@user-id9oi1py4t
Ай бұрын
You're telling me a book made by people(not god like in Islam) in poor condition that can nearly make a difference with a mark?! Everyone takes the shada kiss the blackstone
@MalhaoDelas
22 күн бұрын
@@user-id9oi1py4tIf the Word of God cannot be corrupted in Islam, how could the Injeel be corrupted into the Bible? Bam, there goes your false prophet's false Faith.
@scout5712
12 күн бұрын
@@user-id9oi1py4tif allah made the book of god in islam why are there ANY contradictions at all?
@user-id9oi1py4t
12 күн бұрын
@@scout5712 guys I was saying ofcourse the bible is going to have contradiction I'm Christian
@scout5712
12 күн бұрын
@@user-id9oi1py4t mb, have a blessed day
@rockzalt
Ай бұрын
The lies come from not deeply thinking about things. It's like a bank robbery. One witness says the robber was five foot eleven and another says he was six foot two. Nobody will argue that the bank robbery never happened. That would be dumb.
@Dripxxl-i4k
Ай бұрын
You debunked your own religion. If your God is real and All Knowing then he should know the smallest details 😂
@captainblocker4324
Ай бұрын
but god didn’t write the bible? humans did, and human scribes make mistakes?
@Dripxxl-i4k
Ай бұрын
@@captainblocker4324 And that makes Christianity a Man made religion
@Fettomocken
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4k ((()))
@johnmccrossan9376
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4k no it makes the bible (which is part of Christianity not the whole thing) a product of secondary causes which God, even in islam, is always using. God allows these small variants because they don't matter, the bible is a tool for strengthening faith not the bedrock on which the faith rests. If there was something truly wrong or misleading put there by the human author God didn't allow that book to be collected as part of the canon, such as the gnostic books.
@nexus.7512
Ай бұрын
I'm a Muslim , but this actually kinda makes sense , I will learn more about Christianity definitely and maybe convert if it's true , I am a person who follows the truth not what feels good or is easy
@LovedLamb
Ай бұрын
read the new testament then. According to the Bible Jesus claimed to be the truth, way and life. How many people claim to know with 100% confidence on what the truth, way and life really is?
@freedomclub2285
Ай бұрын
I'm a christian and I truly respect you for being open minded. So huge respect to you! Wheter you find that Islam or Christianity is the truth does not matter, for I respect you for caring about the truth and not just blindly following something. So may God bless you and peace be with you no matter what!
@adamstoweett6803
Ай бұрын
@@nexus.7512 may God bless you and lead you to the right path
@nexus.7512
Ай бұрын
@@adamstoweett6803 may god lead us all to the right path man 🙏
@emanueldargan
29 күн бұрын
@@nexus.7512 if only people where as open minded and truth seeking as you
@N00SENECK
Ай бұрын
Islam critiquing the “age of” anything is wild when they can’t even get the age of consent right 😂
@TestifyApologetics
Ай бұрын
💀
@corythecorythosaurus1983
Ай бұрын
💀💀💀💀
@lashingbeatle80i10
Ай бұрын
💀💀💀💀💀
@AurelianTheRestorerOfRome
Ай бұрын
💀💀💀💀💀💀
@catholicumbra
Ай бұрын
💀
@AurelianTheRestorerOfRome
Ай бұрын
“Let me prove to you that the Bible is filled with contradictions habibi.” **Shows all of the minor contradictions that aren’t related to what we believe** “See!? It’s filled with contradictions! Now join Islam so you can have 4 wives who can be younger than 18 and so that you can pray to Muhammad 5 times a day which is definitely not idol worship!”
@LucksThePluckThatShouldntExist
Ай бұрын
"sir this is a wendy's"
@Dripxxl-i4k
Ай бұрын
Lol it doesnt matter what u believe or not 😂 If your Holy book is actually from God then you cant have minor contradiction. Its so funny how you debunked your own religion
@darklorddork8520
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4kthat actually not the case. The Christian position is that these texts were sent from God and their original texts (the autographs) were without error with each other. However minor errors popped up when these perfect books were copied, as the copyists were imperfect. So minor contradictions like these don’t pose an issue unless it can be proven to be part of the original text, which variations in manuscripts as outlined in the video disprove.
@accountname5626
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4k we don't believe Bible was directly sent by God. The bible is a book INSPIRED by God and WRITTEN in the language of men. Because men are not perfect it will contain some minor errors or even some of the author's own personal biases, but God's main message is not contradicted
@UnionSince452
Ай бұрын
@drip engage with the arguments presented in the video
@koderamerikaner5147
Ай бұрын
I love how I can always watch videos early because you post them in playlists.
@PloFilms
Ай бұрын
Whaaaat
@TestifyApologetics
Ай бұрын
sshhhhhhh
@histrocas4193
Ай бұрын
wait whaat
@niccolopaganini1782
Ай бұрын
I've done that before 🤭
@90Echo._.
Ай бұрын
@koderamerikaner5147 oh hey its you I think this video explains what I was thinking in the previous video
@stevej71393
Ай бұрын
The thing to remember about dawah (Muslim apologetics) is that it doesn't operate according to western standards of intellectual discourse. It relies much more on bravado and passion than simple "if A, then B". A Muslim argument can be completely vacuous but if the apologist says it with enough energy and conviction, Muslim listeners will take it seriously.
@j.bernardsaipoh8111
Ай бұрын
@@stevej71393 I agree with this. They way they have a discourse much more of the dominant tone "boohoo you're wrong, I win you lose". The kind of discourse that I like was from AskCliffe where he ends the conversation with "either I'm wrong or you're wrong. You should re-read both books and decide yourself" that is proper discourse. Discourse supposed to be both party stand on middle ground but Muslims usually treat it like its tug of war.
@zjzr08
Ай бұрын
I wonder if they'd be enamoured by Christian charistmatic apologists then hehe.
@wtfboom4585
Ай бұрын
To be fair some "Christian" apologetics works like this too, aka the evangelicals and creationists. In quotes because I wouldn't even count those people as Christians (and I'm an atheist)
@fisharmor
Ай бұрын
@@wtfboom4585 And atheists have a long and rich tradition of doing that - shunning the unbeliever. Christianity is a religion of Truth. Christ said "I am the Truth" and this is an important part of understanding Christianity - devotion to objective truth is an important first principle in understanding the faith. Sometimes that quest for truth takes us outside our comfort zones. The true Christian response, as the thread implies, is to weigh the evidence and make reasoned arguments, as opposed to taking the Muslim approach of passionately doubling down on fallacies. This is why the people who tend to get upset about the treatment of people like Velikovsky probably at least have a Christian upbringing. When Graham Hancock starts talking, all the scientists do is shun the unbeliever, but those who want truth are hearing something different - we're hearing Hancock repeatedly give litanies of other people the scientific community have shunned rather than listen. We hear Muslims shouting someone down. To be honest I'm not a fan of Kent Hovind, and he definitely subscribes to some theology I categorically disagree with - but when I hear his argument on creationism, he makes some convincing points. In particular, his point about how the lost P-38 squadron kinda destroys the veracity of the Greenland ice core samples, or his examples of fast fossilization. Likewise, the most mouth-frothing evangelicals have *something* to offer. You might not want to sit through it, but the decent thing to do is to admit that you don't want to spend the time sifting through it, rather than dismiss it entirely. But shunning the unbeliever when you also profess not to be one... that makes the least sense of all.
@Yipper64
Ай бұрын
Something weird ive noticed when talking to a Muslim recently in a comment section, is he keeps quoting the Coran at me and asking "well, what's the problem? We believe basically the same thing, Jesus didnt die, and he didnt say you follow him or go to hell" And I keep trying to tell him, no the bible literally says those things arent true, so we do disagree on that. Like he's trying to gaslight me into thinking that Coran is more authoritative to the bible even though im a Christian. Really weird.
@MsJfraser
Ай бұрын
@Yipper64 What's more bizarre is their explanation for the Quran. Muslims claim God's words cannot be corrupted, yet they simultaneously claim his previous words had to be corrupted to set the stage for the Quran. The other is the claim of the gospels not being written until decades after Jesus. They overlook the Quranic version of Jesus was written centuries later. No first witnesses on that edition in any regard. The Quran is as much about Muhammad as Allah whereas the Bible is basically about Jesus.
@everythingforu99
Ай бұрын
@@MsJfraser God only gave the seal of protection to the Quran Allah, the Almighty, says in the Quran: “Indeed, it is We who sent down the Quran, and indeed, We will be its guardian.” (Surah Al-Hijr, 15:9). This verse is a testament to the divine promise that the Quran will remain unchanged and preserved in its original form. And the oldest Bible present codex sinaiticus which came after 400 years after the resurrection of Jesus and Islam in 630 A.D so only a difference of 200 years.
@MsJfraser
Ай бұрын
@@everythingforu99 Allah can only protect what he personally delivers in person. Otherwise, it is left to dedicated individuals to maintain its accuracy. Otherwise, Muhammad dictated from memory and dictated to others to write down. Caliph Uthman had the Quran rewritten and destroyed all existing copies to the greatest extent possible. Why would he need to do that if Allah's words cannot be corrupted? Do you even hear yourself?
@everythingforu99
Ай бұрын
@@MsJfraser Utman burned the Quran because as you may know Arabic has many dialects and each dialect had different grammar to avoid confusion Caliph Utman Ibn Affan burned the Quran and issued the standardized version which was the original text nothing new. We can prove this form The Birmingham Quran Manuscript which is an exact word to word copy of the Modern day Quran and was written when Muhammad was alive. And also the reason why Allah tells that Quran cannot be corrupted is because people memorize it and can easily identify a mistake. And if God has given his guarantee that this book will not change it surely won't.
@MsJfraser
Ай бұрын
@@everythingforu99 What you're telling me is the Quran was becoming corrupted linquistically. Therefore, Allah desired only one dialect be spoken. Either way, the Quran was becoming corrupted. Even the Warsh and Hafs Qurans are not identical. Therefore, it is man who has determined what is suitable and what is not.
@jgrahamiii7749
Ай бұрын
These arguments are in a sense the embodiment of what the Lord said about 'straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel'. The alleged discrepancies between the Books of the Kings and the Books of the Chronicles can be solved by understanding the difference in the emphasis between them. Samuel and Kings are told as history in general where Chronicles is the history with emphasis on the spiritual aspect of it. Besides Islam has far more obvious contradictions in the Qu 'ran than supposed errors in Scripture.
@candypower9988
Ай бұрын
OH NOOOOO, I cant believe Jesus rose from the tomb if two different accounts for the age of Ahazaiah say different numbers
@DominikKoppensteiner
Ай бұрын
3:40 is not neccessarily a copyist error. One text says, he had 40,000 stalls of horses FOR his chariots, and the other says he had 4,000 stalls of horses AND chariots. That would mean, that he had 10 extra stalls of reserve horses for each stall of horses with chariots.
@TrueLight1611
29 күн бұрын
Exactly right
@herrflammen6487
Ай бұрын
The Bible possesses human error, the Quran possesses spiritual error.
@piano9433
Ай бұрын
Very convenient.
@MertAk-or4pz
Ай бұрын
Both religions tell people to pray and give away their energy so the spirituality in both religions are corrupted.
@MertAk-or4pz
Ай бұрын
Why would an almighty God demand worship? Maybe cause it not actually God talking to you? Oh I get it, maybe it is a demon
@salz5375
Ай бұрын
@@MertAk-or4pz show me where in the Bible that God “DEMANDED” us to worship him? People praise and pray to Him because He is the Creator of everything just like you talking to your parents, asking for advices and needs. God is holy, perfect, almighty, unchanged and infinity unlike a demon is just a creature being and in fact, is a fallen angel who was also created by God Himself .I hope that you will find the truth soon and I wil pray for you. Repent and turn to Jesus Christ, accept Him as your saviour. He died for our sins and rose from the death so whoever believes in Him will be saved. God loves you! Amen
@memeboi6017
Ай бұрын
@@MertAk-or4pzbecause humans are made for worship, and if not worshiping the true god, will default to idolatry.
@Lord9Genesis
Ай бұрын
The Arabic "Quran" used today in 90% + of Islamic nations (Hafs Edition) wasn't even decided on until 1924. There are over 30 other different editions that contain thousands of discrepancies, particularly some that have major doctrinal differences.
@aria_sama6207
Ай бұрын
@@Lord9Genesis they're all the same the writing style and tajweed are different that's is
@Lord9Genesis
Ай бұрын
@@aria_sama6207 tajwid? There were 10 Qira'ats by the 10th century, all with major differences in them. By 1924 there were so many different recitations that scholars in Egypt made the decision to use Hafs and threw the rest in the Nile! If they were a matter of tajwid, why not let them all be used?
@aria_sama6207
Ай бұрын
@@Lord9Genesis people can still use them if they want thou ,you won't go to prison if you use a different Qiraa
@GogglesOstrich
Ай бұрын
@@aria_sama6207 John 3:16 ESV "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. John 14:6 ESV Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. ❤️✝️
@Yipper64
Ай бұрын
Wait so literally their doctrines as they are now have only existed for around 100 years. Barely two generations or so?
@flaviofr4v0
Ай бұрын
The Bible is like the STOP sign in the traffic: it may be written in lots of different languages, but their meaning are all the same.
@LovedLamb
Ай бұрын
why should translation even change the meaning? You shall not kill - You should forgive 77 times- Gauge your eyes off if they cause you to sin- I forgive your sins- Jesus cursed the fig tree- your neck is like the tower of David- will be the same in every language. If you read in context you would know which are serious and which aren't.
@johannthedeceitful5968
24 күн бұрын
@@flaviofr4v0 Stop sinning, that is :)
@stephenm8233
Ай бұрын
When I’m talking to a Muslim about the Injeel/Torah, as affirmed by in their own Quran, they will run to pointing out supposed contradictions. My immediate response is “that couldn’t be less relevant. Your Quran affirms them, whether full of contradictions or not.” Don’t take the bait. Their Quran affirms our scriptures, whether they like it or not, and they are in between a rock and a hard place to make sense of the absurdity.
@JamesMoore-uq5oi
Ай бұрын
Absolutely, Even their hadith literature gives more evidence against the Muslim claim of the Quran teaching corruption of the bible. Mohammad approving of a physical Torah in Sunan Abu Dawood, Book 38, Hadith 4434 is a good example.
@legendaryadam
Ай бұрын
@@JamesMoore-uq5oiThe chain of narration of Hadith is weak because it is a fabrication according to the authority of Ibn Hazm. These two transmitters of this Hadith were weakened in order 1. Hisham bin Sa'd weakened by: [Hibban, Nasai Ibn Hanbal, al Asqalani] 2. Ahmad bin Sa'eed weakened by: [Ibn Hanbal al Jawzi Al Nasai Daraqutni] As a matter of fact, Farid Responds made his own video debunking this claim. Go ahead and watch it. It is titled “[Debunked] The Prophet Accepted the Torah”
@JamesMoore-uq5oi
Ай бұрын
@@legendaryadam Sure, let me elaborate on how Ibn Hazm contributes to the discussion on this hadith. Ibn Hazm was known for being pretty strict in his evaluations, often labeling hadiths as weak or even fabricated based on his unique standards. But it's important to remember that his opinion is just one perspective within a broader scholarly discussion. Other scholars, like Shaykh Al-Albani, actually consider this hadith as hasan. Now, about the narrators Hisham bin Sa'd and Ahmad bin Sa'eed: it's true that they've faced criticism from some scholars. For example, Ibn Hibban and Al-Nasai pointed out some inconsistencies with Hisham bin Sa'd, but he wasn’t completely dismissed by everyone. Scholars like Al-Dhahabi noted that he was reliable in certain contexts. So, it might be a bit unfair to dismiss him outright without considering the context and other corroborating evidence. Similarly, Ahmad bin Sa'eed was criticized by figures like Ahmad ibn Hanbal for precision issues, but it’s crucial to look at his narrations alongside other evidence. In hadith science, multiple weak chains can sometimes support and strengthen a narration, especially if they align with established Islamic teachings. Scholars often consider a variety of chains and perspectives, and that's why it's essential to look at a wide range of scholarly opinions. This helps us gain a more comprehensive understanding of the hadith's authenticity and relevance. Respected scholars like Imam Al-Daraqutni, Al-Tirmidhi, and Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani also support the authenticity of Sunan Abi Dawud 4449. So, while some may argue against it, it's far from being "debunked," as your video suggests. Instead, it represents one side of the ongoing debate, showing the complexity and depth of hadith authenticity. edit: Al-Albani's rating is hasan and not sahih
@legendaryadam
Ай бұрын
@@JamesMoore-uq5oi also is this generated from AI? I just ran this through some tests and this is quite embarrassing 82% AI generated
@legendaryadam
Ай бұрын
@@JamesMoore-uq5oi Also Al Albani graded the Hadith Hasan-Daif not Sahih, I just read the grading. This is embarrassing.
@TheGoodShepard31
Ай бұрын
Shake Dookman is punching the air rn 😂😂😂
@j.mtherandomguy8701
Ай бұрын
This is actually a classic case of Muslims applying their own standards for the Quran onto the Bible without considering how the 2 books are regarding, in other words, a clear false equivalence fallacy. (Contradictions in the Quran itself and between the Qira’at aside).
@midimusicforever
Ай бұрын
Funny thing is, when they dunk on the Bible, they also dunk on the Quran and Allah as a side effect.
@golf2enjoyer
Ай бұрын
@@midimusicforever we don't
@seekthetruth7074
Ай бұрын
Right, because the Quran claims that the words of Allah cannot be altered, and the Tawrat (Torah) and Injil (Gospel) are inspired by Allah
@hhermon6415
Ай бұрын
@@seekthetruth7074Yes but the tawrat and injeil are not the books you have. Take the gospels for example, you belive they are the eyewitness accounts of the disciples correct? However surah 5 ayat 46 tells us that the injeil Allah is referencing is what was directly revealed to Jesus pbuh. Also Allah's words are not changed people misattribute words to him as shown in surah 2 ayat 79 making the older scriptures corrupt. For example if I said 2+2=4 then you went away and told people I said 2+2=5 my words have bot changed you have misattributed words to me making the statment false doesvthat make sense?
@golf2enjoyer
Ай бұрын
@@seekthetruth7074 1. Allah knows best why He allowed the Tawrat and Injeel to be corrupted, but as far as I know, we believe that He left the preservation of those books to the people as a test. He then promised to preserve the Qur'an, and that is happening to this day and will happen forever. The Qur'an can not be corrupted. 2. The Tawrat and Injeel are inspired by God, but the Torah and Gospel we have today are not the Tawrat and Injeel that were sent to Musa/Moses as. and to Isa/Jesus as.
@MINDLYFG
28 күн бұрын
@@hhermon6415 Quran 5:46, QURAN 5:66, Quran 3:48 LOL the “injil” is quite literally a book my guy your contradicting you religion
@CaioPSouza
Ай бұрын
Bro your content is just gold, I wish your channel was bigger fr. you strengthened my faith a lot.
@ThePrimusCrusader
Ай бұрын
The Quran confirms the Torah/Gospel many times. It's literally what we had at the time. It's what we had before Muhammed, during his life and after. The same universal core message has not changed through textual variants from translations. 25,000 New testament manuscripts with only 1% textual variants. These textual variants don't change the core universal message at all. Which means the Quran contradicts the core universal message of the Bible. Which means that the Quran is false. If Islam can't produce the "true torah and Injil," then Islam's only evidence is "trust me bro. They're lost" That alone will be the Islamic dilemma FOREVER!
@Mroat84669
Ай бұрын
The Qur'an mentioned it but also mentioned that it was distorted. Certainly it was not completely distorted, but the Jews changed it and many more, as well as what comes after it. The Qur'an does not acknowledge its authenticity.
@Mroat84669
Ай бұрын
25A thousand manuscripts first that all of these copies are not the handwriting of their author or that nothing was written during his existence. Rather, the first of them was written no less than two centuries after the death of the writers of the Gospels. Christians can not prove the attribution of these manuscripts to their writers, and these copies and others that you speak about There are so many of them that no two people agree, as they have been subject to addition and subtraction according to the whims of the copyists
@nizarnor5763
Ай бұрын
The video just confirms over and over what the quran states about the injil and the torah being books of god that were tampered with due to bad preservation by its people.
@ThePrimusCrusader
Ай бұрын
@@Mroat84669I thought no one can distort/Corrupt/chage Allah's words? Surah Al-An'am (6:115) "And the word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His words, and He is the Hearing, the Knowing." You cannot prove the universal core message changed after 2000 years. It's literally what we had with us at the time of Muhammed. You still haven't proven anything. You cannot produce a "true" torah and "true" gospel that says otherwise. The dilemma is yours, my friend. The burden of proof will always be on YOU.
@LitoLochoss
Ай бұрын
@@Mroat84669false
@user-wj7up1mj2s
Ай бұрын
3:26 Skibidi toilet is so popular even testify had to get on the joke
@TestifyApologetics
Ай бұрын
How do you do, fellow kids?
@Zvpada
Ай бұрын
@@user-wj7up1mj2s ❗️Cringe alert❗️
@mrbangosan6064
Ай бұрын
@@TestifyApologetics brain rot banned words💀🙏
@PloFilms
Ай бұрын
@@TestifyApologeticsSo Sigma
@Moai_Guy09
28 күн бұрын
Your pfp seems to contradict your username
@TheGrayVR
Ай бұрын
Actually the Bible predicted Muhammad & Joseph Smith in the same verses! It’s 2 Peter 2:1-3
@johannthedeceitful5968
Ай бұрын
You had me in the first half, not gonna lie
@TheGrayVR
Ай бұрын
@@johannthedeceitful5968 lol
@Aneagleyouneversawbefore
Ай бұрын
I think The angel who appeared before Muhammad is the same angel who appeared to Joseph Smith
@Sanguinary797
Ай бұрын
@@Aneagleyouneversawbeforecorrect, in fact that Angel may be a certain Seraphim that is mentioned multiple times in the Bible. I forgot his name but I think it started with an S.
@infernoslayer5393
Ай бұрын
Except both are heretics so the correct term is demon
@HBob_HB
Ай бұрын
Gotta love finding these videos before they come out.
@MessianicJewJitsu
Ай бұрын
Even an inventory error by Luc. Fox would mean Bruce Wayne wasn't actually the Batman saving His people the whole time.
@CorneliusCorndogJr
Ай бұрын
3:25 never thought I would see skibidi toilet on an apologetics video
I became a Christian at 17 before even touching a bible so all arguments are irrelevant for me.
@NectarLG77
Ай бұрын
I love how most of the “contradictions” come from the Old Testament, especially from Historic Books (Solomon, Kings, Chronicles etc) and not from prophets or even the New Testament.
@davidkowal2670
Ай бұрын
@@NectarLG77 actually, many state the differences in matthew, mark, luke and john. Because some texts say different stuff. Even though its just a different perspective of what happened and each writer, wrote his perspective down, and focused on different details.
@NectarLG77
Ай бұрын
@@davidkowal2670 they say the same thing. Some Muslims just fail to understand this. Same thing doesn't mean excact same words. Otherwise we would include just 1 Gospel. Each include different parts of Jesus's life, but when it comes to important parts, they all write the same
@iAmBadAtRodding
Ай бұрын
Sheikh Ibn Footnote's favourite tactic
@aikonakamoto9030
Ай бұрын
The horse one is not an error, it is 100% correct. One verse says there are 40,000 stalls FOR HORSES. Period. The other says 4,000 stalls for horses AND CHARIOTS. 40k horses, 4k chariots, 10 horses per chariot. Why is 40,000 excessive? Population of Israel was several million by this point. They could easily have hundreds of thousands of horses.
@disconnecteddisconnected
Ай бұрын
That’s a good point that everyone misses!
@briandiehl9257
Ай бұрын
I think Muslims don't realize people can point out contradictions in their texts also
@Dripxxl-i4k
Ай бұрын
Theres no contradiction in Quran
@soversetile
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4ksee what we mean?
@CodeAndSuccess
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4k maybe. But the whole religion makes no sense. Why would Allah allow Christianity and for billions of people following a lie? Quran denies Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, which is a historic fact. There are your errors.
@Dripxxl-i4k
Ай бұрын
@@CodeAndSuccess Stupid statement. Why Jesus allow billions of Muslims follow a lie If everyone follows the right path whats the purpose of hell
@adrieliel9105
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4k yet you let someone named usman to burn the other 7 copies? God also let muhammad to allow prostitution just because his army were at war (3 day marriage)?, imagine if that's your sister or your mom. You guys literally have a hadith published and some tafsirs or what not 100 years after the quran was made, while claiming it's the word of god and was easy to understand.. which you guys also cherry picked knowing those "hadiths" clearly state muhammad married a 6 year old. Really? your god allah almighty let his prophet marry a child who is playing with a doll, what a sick god
@raphaelfeneje486
Ай бұрын
Watching this gives me joy 😊
@WiredWisdomAndPsychology
Ай бұрын
Many of these so called "contradictions" have reasonable explanations. Soloman had 40,000 stalls of horses FOR his chariots. Soloman has 4000 stalls for horse AND chariots. Not a contradiction. 4000 stalls for both horses and chariots. 10 horses per chariot (40,000 horses). If some get tired and injured, you can switch them out so your chariot remains operational. As far as the king ages, a reasonable explanation is that we are reading about a coregency. Someone can be called king at 8 years old, but in reality the mother or someone else is in charge. Later on at 18 the king would gain total control. Sometimes what appears to be a contradiction, could have a reasonable explanation.
@stephenhalfwit-6897
Ай бұрын
For all these little "errors" there's several reasonable explanations even without accepting scribal miscopying
@Christisthetruce
Ай бұрын
Good thing our word of God isn’t the Bible it’s Jesus and he’s perfect😌(John 1/john 1:14)
@Dripxxl-i4k
Ай бұрын
You dont worship bible. But you believe Bible is sent by God. Whats the difference 😂
@Orthosaur7532
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4k No we don't. It was inspired by Him, but not written or "sent". Bogus
@tacosdeagua1406
Ай бұрын
@@Dripxxl-i4k It wasn't, for example, The gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were written by those disciples
@everythingforu99
Ай бұрын
@@Orthosaur7532 Thank God in Islam we don't believe that the Quran was inspired by God but were the exact words of God. And also religions like Hinduism, Sikism, Hellenism, etc. Were inspired by God and wrote what they thought God is, how can you be sure your inspiration is correct and not theirs?
@Orthosaur7532
Ай бұрын
@@everythingforu99 Because Jesus verified it.
@user-lr3yw1gu4m
Ай бұрын
Matthew 7:15 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, inwardly they are ferocious wolves”. Jesus Christ warned us about Muhammad
@au8363
Ай бұрын
Glory To The Triune GOD
@rkeewi
Ай бұрын
My Muslim friend told me, "Jesus was never killed on the cross; instead, he was taken to heaven by God. It was Muhammad who suffered for humanity. He pleaded to God on behalf of humans, and God made his soul suffer for humanity and all their sins. Every day, Muhammad cried to God for humans." When I told her that was false and it seemed like they were making it look like Muhammad took Jesus's role in the story, she got upset and said she never intended to offend me. She then said, "It’s your book that is corrupted. What do you say about that?" I never got to explain because she said, "Let’s not talk about religion." Later, she sent me an apologetic Muslim video trying to prove me wrong, but we haven't talked since.
@hidehico6709
26 күн бұрын
Lol, what muslim said that?
@wraves693
Ай бұрын
If my Muslim friends tell me where this injeel is, then I'll answer the horses question.
@hhermon6415
Ай бұрын
It with Allah and his messenger Isa pbuh, but we no longer have a need for the injeil as surah 5 ayat 48 tells us the Quran is to be used as the supreme criterion over all other scripture. I'm aware we are not freinds but would you be so kind as to answer the "horse question"
@The_Paladin440
Ай бұрын
I think the problem with misreading those numerals wasn't a sleepy scribe, but perhaps a scribe with bad eyesight. After all, glasses didn't exist back then, did they?
@jackalenterprisesofohio
Ай бұрын
Eehhh....sort of sort of not, glass used for eyesight did sort of exist, but sort of didn't since the quality of glass wasn't the type to be made into small eye sized pieces made in specifc per person basis.
@Derek_Baumgartner
Ай бұрын
Christian polemic: "Your book affirms our book, while contradicting it. The Qur'an is false no matter what." Islamic polemic: "But how many horses tho? And what about the KJV!" Also caught that "Where is the Injeel?" there: I think you may have been watching Avery doing some chef-work over in England. :)
@DefinitelyNotAnAddict
Күн бұрын
Everyone that tells me it contains error expects me to say "nuh uh" but i say "show me ill research" and they run
@danielwilliams7161
Ай бұрын
If I have 100 books, I also have 10 books.
@Jack.C.Fichtner
Ай бұрын
Bravo! Perfectly explained, I have always found those Muslim street preachers a bit, boisterous at times. I’d love to see you confront one in real life soon.
@mistakendawg8885
Ай бұрын
Not likely to happen. He wouldn't stand toe to toe in a debate.
@Crosshair84
Ай бұрын
3:40 Kings describes the number of horses FOR the chariots. Chronicles describes the number OF chariots. Just as the Mongols would bring a dozen or so remounts with them for every fighter, a chariot would have multiple horses for it. A horse can't run all day pulling a chariot. Horses would need to be swapped out. So 4,000 chariots and 40,000 horses means 10 horses per chariot. Some of which may have been for carrying supplies and not for battle. The 4,000 horses and 4,000 chariots COULD be the correct one, but it is not a requirement.
@AskBibleNotes
Ай бұрын
The KJV reads just fine: Solomon had forty thousands stalls of horses, and four thousand stalls for his horses and chariots. No errors there. 1Kings 4:26 And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen. 2 Chr 9:25 And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.
@NGAOPC
Ай бұрын
ANE texts also made use of symbolic value to numbers and given the Hebrew, words can have been read as numbers; “elef” as a number is 1000 but also means chief, head of something. Colin Humphreys had several pieces in Vetus Testamentum on this in 1998-2000.
@williamkennedy2474
Ай бұрын
In a 2020 interview, conservative Islamic scholar Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi stated that "every single student of knowledge ... who studies ulum of Quran" knows "that the most difficult topics are ahruf and qira’at",[13] so vexing that even "the most advanced of our scholars, they are not quite fully certain how to solve all of the unanswered questions in there.",[72] and so sensitive that it "should never be brought up in public" and is "not something you discuss among the masses".[73] Qadhi quotes a hadith where a companion of Muhammad (Ubayy ibn Ka'b) is reported to have said: "'in my heart a doubt came that I hadn’t had about Islam since the days of jahil'" and goes on to implore listeners, "this is not a joke brothers and sisters. The issue of Ahruf and Qiraat has caused confusion to somebody who the prophet said if you want to listen to the Quran directly listen to Ubay. …."[74]
@PR1NC345
Ай бұрын
They get u down this qustion rabbit hole where the way we answer only benefits them towards the next qustion until it they prove their point so we have to say after knowing what he was trying to say at the end "No actually because you didnt mention how" and it makes us look bad as we backtrack even if we're right but rarely bc the ppl they be asking be like "what's a denomination?" Instead of debating educated Christians
@bman5257
Ай бұрын
The problem with saying that every alleged error is a copyist error is that when you use this tactic where there is no evidence of an interpolation, then there’s no reason for someone to say that any verse in the Bible isn’t an interpolation. If anything can be a scribal error, than anything can be a scribal error, by the law of identity.
@yodasadoy2079
Ай бұрын
Muhammad is actually predicted heaps in the Bible (look them up, you’ll see): Galatians 1:9 Acts 20:29 Deuteronomy 18:20 Matthew 7:15 Jeremiah 23:16 Look them up and you’ll have to agree that although it doesn’t say Muhammad, it is talking about him and predicting him
@nusuntbrichetacuantivant
Ай бұрын
Galatians 1:8 Islam is FALSE!
@yodasadoy2079
Ай бұрын
@@nusuntbrichetacuantivant Congratulations on missing the point
@AuricSilverfinger
Ай бұрын
So a guy who came 600 years after can 'predict' the bible?
@kalinridenour
15 күн бұрын
Thank you for acknowledging the contradictions and saying that the Bible is not dictated by God. I have met way too many people who just deny the existence of any contradictions and insist that the Bible was written by God Himself. It’s honestly infuriating, and seeing such self-proclaimed “devout” people deny the truth about the Bible has damaged my faith more than just about anything
@nrowned5975
Ай бұрын
Imagine starting an argument from "we don't know if the bible is accurate" and then building up on that. 😅
@user-jl2xn4lp3d
Ай бұрын
muslims say that all the Bibles in the world were once rewritten. and how was this explained? After all, by the time this mohamed was firstly appeared , the Gospel had already spread very far. in their opinion, there was a secret world agency that took all Bibles from people around the world and replaced them with other rewritten copies that was completely identical to each other ? or what ? That's completely stupid, people should never listen to them
@eurasian23
Ай бұрын
2 Samuel 24:9 1984 NIV: Joab reported the number of the fighting men to the king: In Israel there were eight hundred thousand ablebodied men who could handle a sword, and in Judah five hundred thousand. 1 Chronicles 21:5 Joab reported the number of the fighting men to David: In all Israel there were one million one hundred thousand men who could handle a sword, including four hundred and seventy thousand in Judah. Okay now I didn't actually expect that but it's prolly a translation error lol but it says INCLUDING FOUR HUNDERED THOUSAND IN JUDAH which means that they are the SAME and anybody who doesn't know the art of ROUNDING numbers will be fooled
@Waldemarvonanhalt
Ай бұрын
More than a million armed men is a massive number for a pre-industrial age army. I reckon it was probably referring to everyone who could theoretically take up the sword to fight, but fielding an army of such a size all at the same time during pre-industrial times would have dire implications for agriculture during that year and the years immediately afterwards.
@longiusaescius2537
Ай бұрын
@Waldemarvonanhalt patrician pfp bro
@mateofamate1387
Ай бұрын
I'd be interested to hear your take on the 2 Samuel 24:1 and 1 Chronicles 21:1 contradiction, where in Samuel it is said that God called David to count the Israelites while Chronicles states that Satan provoked David to perform the census. My personal takeaway was that, when Samuel was written, "demons" were referred to as "bothersome spirits of the Lord" like the one that would occasionally bother King Saul, so at the time Samuel was written, "Satan" was understood to be an agent of the Lord, like a necessary evil that exists for a good purpose, but by the time Chronicles was written, the concept of "Satan" being something separate from the Lord had been established, but I think it's still important to understand Satan as being a "spirit of the Lord" since Satan was still created by an all-knowing creator that must have known what choices Satan would make in the future, the creation of Satan was by no measure a "mistake" so it can be understood that whatever Satan does, God must allow to happen, like when the lying spirit told God about his plan to lie to King Ahab's prophets, or when Satan approached God about his plan to convert Job. I personally feel like painting Satan as a completely separate deity that somehow was never meant to be here and somehow pulled the wool over God to make the world fall sends a message like "God lost to Satan" or "God never intended for humans to exist past Adam and Eve" because that tells people that everything good about the world exists only because of Satan and not because of God. While it might be true that the current world we live, and our own existence would not have happened if Satan didn't tempt Adam and Eve, it would be wrong to suggest that God did not intend for Satan to tempt Adam and Eve, or that God didn't already know that Adam and Eve would use their free-will to choose to take the fruit of knowledge.
@matejaradivojevic3473
Ай бұрын
@@mateofamate1387 Then I would suggest you read Exodus 30:12 to 16 which talks about how a regional census must be done otherwise a King will doom Israel if he doesn't follow the rules
@David_Ray
Ай бұрын
[2 Samuel 24:1 LSB] And again the anger of Yahweh burned against Israel, and it incited David against them to say, "Go, number Israel and Judah." Some translations put "he" but there is no reason for "he" to be there. God was angry with Israel and Satan or (adversary) incited David to number them. [1 Chronicles 21:1 LSB] Then Satan stood up against Israel and incited David to number Israel. Thats my take anyways.
@matejaradivojevic3473
Ай бұрын
@@David_Ray I already answered him, and the answer also implies to you
@David_Ray
Ай бұрын
@@matejaradivojevic3473 Dont think the question was, why was there a punishment so really not sure what you are answering. Your response has nothing to do with mine. Thanks though edit: unless you are saying God called him to do it and he did it wrong? Then are you saying God is the adversary?
@matejaradivojevic3473
Ай бұрын
@@David_Ray God told him to count the men that are able to fight which is a test to David as in Exodus 30:12-16 isn't allow as it calls on mistrust if a King doubts how many soldiers the Israel can provide. Thats why it is said he done it anyway and forgot God's decree.
@marvelouschester473
Ай бұрын
Great video that brings to light the confusions And false arguments muslims have. Amazing for young believers of the one true God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, whom is one essence and three Persons, Word coming into flesh in the Name above all Names Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Great job brothers! I thank Our God for You, Hallelujah 🙌🙌🙌❤️
@marvelouschester473
Ай бұрын
If you are a young believer let not the world and the people who have been deceived by the world shake your faith. Also edify other your brothers and sisters and warn them of those deceived by false prophets. In my experience when young in faith a direct experience with one of those lost sheep who are dead set on their belief in lies can be harsh, as it sets open a direct attack for the liar/devourer, whom has already been defeated by the Blood of the Lamb, Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour. Know that Jesus our God is always with you because he is everywhere because he is God, and know he is an infinity times stronger and wiser than any other power, Amen Brothers and Sisters. I love you all and thank Our lord and Saviour Jesus Christ for you all❤
@random_evo_guy9120
Ай бұрын
I just ask them how old is Aisha so they won't bother me
@dwight9850
Ай бұрын
Try Going back to the 7th century or further back and ask people there if it's not normal.
@Yeahbaby-fr
29 күн бұрын
@@dwight9850 Have they not travelled throughout the land so their hearts may reason, and their ears may listen? Indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but it is the hearts in the chests that grow blind. Al-hajj 46
@oiefewjlijk-bw7bo
29 күн бұрын
That's literally how people used to live back then. By the way, Aisha (R.A)'s age is not fully confirmed because Arabs back then did not use calendars but used events to track the dates. The "9" year old today you see is not the same 9 year old that lived in 7th century in the middle of the desert.
@nicholas2113
4 күн бұрын
@@oiefewjlijk-bw7bo so you're saying PDFiles are fine?
@alexmj1401
Ай бұрын
They always go for the Old Testament too
@Crosshair84
Ай бұрын
Islam believes the Quran is inerrant. Christianity believes that the message contained in the Bible is inerrant. It is important to understand the distinction. An Asian tourist may ask you, "Where office post to letter go mail, tell please?" This message is incredibly corrupted, yet any native English speaker will be able to decipher the message after a few moments, "Could you please tell me where the post office is to mail a letter?" The transmission was corrupted, but 100% of the message made it through. What matters in the Bible is the message, not specific word order.
@DaveM86
Ай бұрын
Changing the order of words or their interpretation cannot help but alter the message of any book. A sentence, yes, possibly. Thousands of interconnected sentences? No.
@MercyTemplar
28 күн бұрын
They present such immense evidence that the black stone is calling me to kiss it
@DominikKoppensteiner
Ай бұрын
In the Quran, there is a genuine mistake, which cannot be excused by a copyist error. The different numbers in the Bible don't affect any Christian doctrine, but in Surah 4:11-14, Allah gives the laws for inheritance, and disobeying them will lead to hell. Fair enough, if obeying them wasn't impossible in some cases. Let's say a man dies and leaves behind his parents, his 2 daughters, and his wife. The parents are supposed to get 1 sixth each, that is 1 third in total (33%). The daughters share 2 thirds (67%). The wife gets 1 eighth (12.5%). If we add all these shares together, we get 112.5%, which is impossible - unless a miracle happens, then it's fair enough.
@unidentified5390
Ай бұрын
What answers do Muslims usually give to this objection?
@usaamah135
Ай бұрын
@unidentified5390 The percentages given in the Quraan are to be followed. In many cases it can go over 100%, not just this case. You do the working out and after it goes pass 100% all shares are reduced in proportion to bring it back to 100%.
@DominikKoppensteiner
Ай бұрын
@@usaamah135 But if you reduce the shares in proportion, aren't you directly transgressing the commandment of Allah? The best answer from a Muslim perspective would be: Allah will work a miracle in sich cases.
@usaamah135
Ай бұрын
@DominikKoppensteiner no you aren't. You are fulfilling what Allah has commanded by keeping the shares in proportion. I don't get why you brought up inheritance laws out of everything in order to try and prove that the Quraan has mistakes. You know, this youtube channel made a video about Islam apparently mistreating women but failed to bring up the aspect of inheritance. It's almost like inheritance in Islam is perfect and fair, whereas the same can't be said about Christianity. The original poster knew that and decided to choose the arguments that wouldn't backfire on him.
@DominikKoppensteiner
Ай бұрын
@@usaamah135 If you keep the shares in proportion, as you say, then you directly reduce them, so that the daughters for example no longer get 2 thirds. And the shares are a commandment of Allah, and the text does not say, that you have authority to change the shares. It says, if you disobey them, you will go to hell. Is there any text in the quran, that authorizes Muslims to change the shares in proportion, so that the daughters for example no longer receive 2 thirds? For example, if the inheritance is 24,000$, then Allah commands that the daughters get 67%, which is 16,000$. If you keep it in proportion, which I guess you do by assuming that 24,000 is 112.5% instead of the actual 100%, then the daughters get around 14.300$, which is about 60% or 3 fifths. You have effectually decreased their share from 67% to 60%, so is there any text in the Quran, that authorizes that change?
@pandz9380
4 күн бұрын
When you read the whole story of Ahaziah then you see that he was king then he was kidnapped and was brought back home then he became king again. That’s why there are two ages.
@barryb.benson7122
Ай бұрын
The Quaran has so many errors and contradictions. I mean it’s no surprise since the author Satan isn’t omniscient.
@jasehobson
Ай бұрын
I love how these Muslim apologists' whole argument is "If Christianity is wrong, then Islam is true."
@yolokuulyop1
28 күн бұрын
please don't be like special and talk like a human for once
@emmanuellawyer8562
Ай бұрын
Bro just happened to be watching the playlist then i randomly fell into this video. Also can you go over more old testament things
@peterilnitsky7677
Күн бұрын
I'd say there is a explanation for Solomons horses. 1 kings 4:26 says that he has 40,000 stalls for his horses only. 2 Chronicles 9:25 says he had 4000 stalls for horses AND chariots. 40k for the horses only, and those stalls where probobly within bigger stalls that kept the chariots inside also.
@lumix2477
Ай бұрын
Over 400 contradictions in the Bible without rightly dividing. Truth is Christ proves kJB and Hope Bible Church has a right division playlist. I'm trusting in nothing but the blood of Jesus to pay for my sins to keep me out of hell. All glory to God, for good reason, in Jesus name Amen
@nizarnor5763
Ай бұрын
400 tho
@Snezzyboi
Ай бұрын
All of the contradictions are just the different grammar or words that the different people used to tell the same story. The bible never actually had contradictions between ideas!
@lumix2477
Ай бұрын
@@Snezzyboi rightly divide or be ashamed at judgment. If you are interested, hope Bible Church has a right division playlist and a judgment seat playlist that I would highly recommend for everyone.
@Real_Mick3y6
Ай бұрын
Huh
@lumix2477
Ай бұрын
@@Real_Mick3y6 👍🔥 I pray for all the Christians to grow in the knowledge of the truth so they do well at our judgment. I pray that anyone who sees this looks into what I'm saying. Hope Bible Church right division playlist is very good and also grace ambassadors, Columbus Bible Church and Richard Jordan.
@ruskibot7745
Ай бұрын
Simply ask which Koran is correct. The fact that there are multiple defeates any possible explanation of perfect and maintained.
@philtanics1082
Ай бұрын
Without lies, Islam dies
@MertAk-or4pz
Ай бұрын
Npc saying the same sh.. over and over again how does it feel to be a comment bot?
@AbuOgi96
Ай бұрын
@@philtanics1082 Christianity*
@AgentProRyan
9 күн бұрын
Amen
@ingloriousMachina
3 күн бұрын
Keeping numbers must have been a nightmare before they added 0...
@sliglusamelius8578
Ай бұрын
Why don't Jews defend their holy books? Christians should focus on promoting the New Testament. We don't have to defend the Old Testament except insofar as it pre-figures the New.
@stephengray1344
Ай бұрын
What makes you think that Jews don't defend their holy books? And the New Testament asserts that very large amounts of the Old are true, and that the whole of it is true enough to be taught from (2 Timothy 3:16). Since the vast majority of our holy books (by both number of books and wordcount) are shared with the Jews, and since there are so many more Christians than there are Jews it's ridiculous for Christians to leave the job of defending our shared scriptures entirely to them.
@sliglusamelius8578
Ай бұрын
@@stephengray1344 They don't do much defending at all. THEY need to step up and explain their books. Example: raqiya in Genesis is not a firm dome barrier, it refers to the expanse of the sky. Why don't Jews generally defend and explain the exact Hebrew meanings of the words of Genesis? I never hear Jews defend the OT. Never. Ever.
@John_Six_Twenty-Nine
Ай бұрын
@@sliglusamelius8578they care a lot more about the Talmud than the Tanakh
@stephengray1344
Ай бұрын
@@sliglusamelius8578 Saying that you don't personally hear Jews defend the Tanakh doesn't mean anything. How many religious Jews do you know well enough to have a good overview of what they do and don't defend their faith against? And why do you think that they should feel compelled to defend and explain the particular detail you bring up? Is it something that people are actively bringing up in an attempt to persuade people out of Judaism?
@sliglusamelius8578
Ай бұрын
@@stephengray1344 It means quite a bit. I am very conversant with matters of faith and science discussions in the public sphere, and I have never once heard a faithful Jew discuss the OT in defense of it. Heck, the most prominent explicator of the OT texts currently is a "gentile" psychologist-professor-turned-social media figure (Jordan Peterson). Why would THAT be do you suppose? It makes no sense, sorry.
@GentlemanBystander
9 күн бұрын
The big problem for those Muslim Street Preachers is that their book affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of Old and New Testaments as a matter of rote, then come's right back around and says "Jesus isn't God" thereby meaning the entire premise of their texts can't be affirmed as serious.
@mnrsteeljoutafel
Ай бұрын
Islam is supposildy the direct word of God. Where as our christian bible is a collection of documents compiled together which have been inspired by God. God is good. Jesus is king. Amen. Pray for the poor ignorant muslims
@sav6408
Ай бұрын
1 Kings 4:26 KJV [26] And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen. 2 Chronicles 9:25 KJV [25] And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem. This isn't a numerical error. In 1 Kings it says forty thousand stalls OF horses for his chariots, whilst in 2 Chronicles it says four thousand stalls FOR horses AND chariots. This means there was forty thousand stalls with ONLY horses in them, and four thousand stall for BOTH horses AND chariots. It's talking about 2 different stalls. Read slowly and you will understand. One bigger stall for ONLY the horses, and another stall which stores four thousand horses AND chariots.
@Snezzyboi
Ай бұрын
I cant wait for the salty muslims to see this and start commenting without even watching the video. lol
@trudgemankPhD
14 күн бұрын
No shot did he just depict apostasy with the Andy throwing away Woody meme 😂
@jacksongraydon2503
Ай бұрын
If a muslim ever starts nitpicking old testament numbers with me, I'll just ask them how old Aisha was when Muhammad first consummated their marriage. (She was 9)
@todekthecat2857
Ай бұрын
oh wow so fricking original
@todekthecat2857
Ай бұрын
aint every country have different requirement of marriage? so why the rules back then must be the same as today?
@todekthecat2857
Ай бұрын
and do people stay the same? no they dont, suprising right? 9 year olds nowadays cant even last one second in class when 9 year olds back then, they are already ready for life
@todekthecat2857
Ай бұрын
and do you know why muslims can bring such arguments from the bible that even the christians are confused? because we actually respect other religions and even study it. almost impossible for you guys? now idk about you but for the people who make this video, he probably just said "nah i will just call another religious book trash" when themself dont even read their books. and they are full of hate (like you too) we as muslims are not teached to hate but respect other religions. we love jesus, more than the jews so why you guys hate us? you guys dont respect us like we do and thats a problem.
@jacksongraydon2503
Ай бұрын
@@todekthecat2857 such a great example. Thank you for demonstrating. You must defend your perfect prophet so you end up justifying his inexcusable behavior.
@johnlee7699
Ай бұрын
Love your user of Skibidi 😂 I never thought it could be redeemed but that is perfect! Thanks for your hard work ❤🔥
@maxmaximum-sh4bx
Ай бұрын
"Time to Dismantle False Religion" - Testify (probably)
@mrtayto99929
15 күн бұрын
"Time to use my horrible coping methods" - Some muslim who made the deadly mistake of watching Testify's videos.
@asadburden1621
Ай бұрын
Another point... Not everything in the bible is supposed to be literal. 40 thousand horses is more likely meant to be a sign of great wealth or power.
@Mugcaptheman
Ай бұрын
This is not how we bring more Muslims into the Christian faith. We insult their Prophet by drawing disrespectful images of him and insult them by portraying them as weird wojaks and ourselves as chads. This isn't preaching. Do better, testify. The video doesn't even have to be about necessarily convincing Muslims but think about it this way. A Muslim comes across this video and shuns everything in it because you insulted his entire belief system while approving your own. That was a potential soul that could have been saved. I was a Muslim once, I know this. God bless you, brother.
@anwershaker8482
28 күн бұрын
4:15 the hand here has 6 fingers
@5BBassist4Christ
Ай бұрын
I find it interesting that the majority of the Old Testament "contradictions" are just number errors in the Masoretic, which are clear in the Septuagint. I'm all for preferring Hebrew over Greek, but the Greek can be a valid proof-read. On the one hand, this argument does shoot down modern Rabbinic Judaism, because they do insist that the Tanakh is perfectly 100% preserved down to the letter, and that the errors are in the Septuagint and New Testament rather than the Masoretic. On the other hand, the fact that practically every genuine OT contradiction is a simple number, shows the extreme care the Jewish Rabbim have taken in preserving the texts. Between the careful preservation of the Masoretic, the refining answers of the Septuagint, and the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Old Testament is remarkably reliable. And although there are some questions on numbers, and a vague mention of a lion, at least it didn't think Moses was Jesus' uncle, who saved Israel from Haman.
@Aquacav
Ай бұрын
It makes it seem more honest that the disciples got confused on whether the crow cocked 2 or 3 times because it’s human memory
@anathamon
Ай бұрын
Jesus is the word of god, the bible is just our best record of him, his story, and his foretelling.
@JesusServantVR
Ай бұрын
Jesus loves you all😊
@fisharmor
Ай бұрын
If I was confronted like this, I'd say "Yeah but I belong to the majority of Christianity which doesn't believe in Sola Scriptura, so that argument doesn't mean anything to me out of the gate. You should be pretty familiar with us since we've been resisting you since 632AD."
@SRose-vp6ew
Ай бұрын
Chronicle says he has 4000 places for horses built, but way more riders, first king says he bought way more horses, it’s not that confusing. I think if you read both scriptures and then really pause, and then you guide the person into the truth, they are more likely to see their error and how they were manipulated. It’s important to understand that when scripture was copied it was checked more times than you can imagine and there was ceremonial bathing involved and checks and rechecks, not to mention prayer.
@revelari
Ай бұрын
Just found my new favorite channel :)
@love_everyone4ever
Ай бұрын
The "How many warriors" question is pretty self-explanatory if you read about the extra 12 divisions containing 24 thousand men each and 12 thousand attached troops to Jerusalem.
@ccrpalex2456
Ай бұрын
If you read carefully, 40,000 stalls of horses and 4,000 stalls of horses are not the same. There is no contradiction. 10 horses per stall for 40,000 horses. Which would be 4000 stalls for horses.
@voided9593
8 күн бұрын
Of course this isn’t all Muslims only some I’ve only ever met one Muslim in my entire life and they were pretty chill they’re only flaw was that they were homophobic and denied the fact some Muslims are misogynists but too be fair a lot of Christians are like that too.
@xXNoJokesXx
Ай бұрын
What does it even matter that some ages / number of horses were inconsistent when it’s never brought up or used for any real theological discussion. It’s not “By the way Jesus never existed and we’re wrong”, it’s a clerical (ha) error. It especially shouldn’t be brought up when discussing age in holy books and actually reading all the words of the holy books (ahem, 9 and the Torah is revelation for hebrews and is supposedly true Quran is for Arabs and is supposedly true)
@PloFilms
Ай бұрын
I can imagine Jehoiachin setting fire to a city while watching skibidi toilet 😂
@ashre_i
Ай бұрын
Watching this as someone of the faith of Judaism, thank you for explaining everything like it was with Hebrew, it is an old language with a lot of confusing grammatical oofs (Numbers and suffixes and other things)
@ryanparris1021
Ай бұрын
Quran 35:18--Quran 16:25 ‼️One of MANY Contradictions in the Quran. It’s loaded with them…Quran 4:82: Then do they not reflect upon the Qur'an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction
@kaiser8195
Ай бұрын
From a child thou hast known the Holy Scriptures which are able to make you wise unto salvation through faith in Christ Jesus, not number of horses, money, population census etc. That's what the Bible is all about.
Пікірлер: 1,3 М.