I would have never get the question on my own without your clarification. Big thanks to you!!!
@gordonho6449
3 жыл бұрын
Cleared up so much of my confusion! Thanks so much for your dedication.
@eyadmostafa3638
3 жыл бұрын
Would you be able to post the link with all the quadric surfaces that you used?
@MathforThought
3 жыл бұрын
Done.
@sarthakbhardwaj659
3 жыл бұрын
Thank You!
@raghavsharma4925
2 жыл бұрын
for example 2, how did you know z=cx?
@MathforThought
2 жыл бұрын
So this is actually quite an interesting question. Essentially I have elliptical cross sections and I want to get circular cross sections. An ellipse is just a stretched circle so if I fixed one of the axis and I then multiplied the other radii by some constant, then the radii of both would match. However, to ensure that the endpoints on the ellipse both remain in the circle, I have to tilt the plane so that the cross section still remains in the cylinder. The reason z=cx is that I want to ensure I scale the x direction of the ellipse by some factor such that the radii of both sides of the ellipse match each other. Does that make sense? I want the radius of the minor axis and major axis to match.
Пікірлер: 9