My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available! Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680 Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680 Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023 Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495 Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e
@dugroz
5 жыл бұрын
"Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than . . . its disregard of the charter of its own existence." . . . Oh snap, indeed, Justice Clark!!!
@sentientnatalie
2 жыл бұрын
Loved that justice's address there!
@BlueHen123
6 жыл бұрын
Due to the common use of bail bonds,I feel the 8th Amendment "No excessive bail" gets abused!
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
Not to mention solitary confinement.
@100samanthamarie
3 жыл бұрын
If police departments and sheriffs offices would have for crime labs for quicker forensics to prove or debunk their evidences, there would be a decreased demand for high bail bondsman amounts.
@Nimish204
2 жыл бұрын
@@iammrbeat Solitary confinement is legitimate punishment for heinous crimes
@ethan6312
2 жыл бұрын
@@Nimish204 Solitary confinement is torture.
@PCDelorian
2 жыл бұрын
@@Nimish204 The UN don't think so, nor does any other civilised country on Earth allow it for prolonged periods of time. Solitary confinement should in theory reduce crime though, but only because the insane aren't guilty of crimes. It is extremely damaging to the mental and physical health of those exposed to it, whilst it can be necessary to be used in the short term for extreme circumstances, it is far too often employed for years over very minor infractions including insolence which could be talking too loud. If this wasn't bad enough jails use it as well meaning a good portion of people subjected to this torture are innocent in the eyes of the law since all people are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
@thealiamin
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Mr. Beat! I'm not an American and have never been to the states, but I still watch all of your videos because you make learning fun! It's always interesting to compare US cases to cases in other countries to see the difference in principals, values and approaches to legal issues. Thanks again Mr Beat - you're amazing! Much love from around the world!
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
Where are you from? That makes me so happy to see that there are those outside the United States that dig the videos :)
@thealiamin
6 жыл бұрын
Mr. Beat I'm a law student in the UK, and my lecturers and professors always draw distinctions between European laws and principles compared to the crazy Americans :p its interesting to see different approaches to civil liberties and human rights e.g. how European hate speech laws contrast with American freedom of speech laws, which are more protected. You're the type of teacher that every kid wishes they had, and I hope you can rest easy knowing that you've educated and improved the knowledge and lives of thousands of people across nations, cultures and continents, many of whom you might not ever meet in real life buy all are grateful to you nonetheless! Thanks again for the video and for taking the time to respond - as long as you'll be uploading videos, I will be watching!!
@Treblaine
Жыл бұрын
Mapp is a god damn legal operator, putting it in her blouse was a smart move but she's like a chess grandmaster playing against a flock of pigeons.
@AntiMasonic93
4 жыл бұрын
The decision in Mapp v. Ohio is a very important precedent within the context of the 4th amendment. Police officers now have to have probable cause as well as a search warrant that describes with particularity what the scope of the search will be. A motion to suppress can be filed if the evidence was obtained illegally.
@HayleeHellzVTuber
2 ай бұрын
Only problem is law enforcement can still use "probable cause" to extend the scope of their search once they're in your home. That's why some lawyers will tell you to say something along the lines of "I do not consent to any searching that goes beyond the scope of the warrant."
@sam2026
6 жыл бұрын
Mr. beast for the memes and Mr. beat for the history
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
What about history memes?
@LOLquendoTV
4 жыл бұрын
@@iammrbeat time to make a second channel
@CuriousBiscuit
4 жыл бұрын
Nah, Mr. Beat beats him.
@felicvik9456
4 жыл бұрын
Drew Durnil
@daltonmaddox5844
3 жыл бұрын
For history memes we use oversimplified and drew durnil
@averagejoe1793
6 жыл бұрын
Friday is my favorite day because it's the last day of the week and Mr. Beat puts out a new video.
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
aw thanks! :D
@mummyneo7112
6 жыл бұрын
I agree with the court because it was an invasion of privacy from the police. Great video Mr Beat!
@jamellfoster6029
2 жыл бұрын
Then the 👮 digging under the lady's 👕 with probably no lady 👮 with them. That's bordering on harassment... Unfortunately, they didn't prosecute sexual harassment 65 years ago & women still didn't have the respect nor opportunities that we have in the 21st century...
@dreamsmichael9719
5 жыл бұрын
This was amazing! I'm a Sophomore in high school and am taking a Criminal Investigation course. I have to write a paper on a search and seizure case and turned to KZitem since I learn better visually and not by reading. This broke everything down into things I could better understand to put into a paper, while still going into great detail. Thank you Mr. Beat, and I will be subscribing! :)
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
Which of the Bill of Rights are most under attack right now?
@zacharyclark4290
6 жыл бұрын
It is in my humble opinion (for what it is worth) a tie between 1st and 2nd Amendments but the attack on any Amendment (including the 4th Amendment) scares me.
@blueseanomad7435
6 жыл бұрын
The Third Mr. Beat! Joking, of course. I'd The First, then again I'd say it's always under attack for various reasons.
@zacharyhenderson2902
6 жыл бұрын
Legislatively, I think the Second Amendment is the most under attack. In terms of the government just disregarding the law, I think the 4th Amendment is under attack the most.
@saliem
6 жыл бұрын
4th if it was effective the DHS wouldn't have been existed
@jacobriddle7230
6 жыл бұрын
The second amendment. After all it was not there to deter tyrannical deer
@PremierCCGuyMMXVI
5 ай бұрын
Glad they sided with Mapp, the police unlawfully broke in and charged her with ridiculous crimes that they weren’t even originally intending to find her guilty of. You shouldn’t be allowed to be charge with a crime even if you committed it if the police didn’t unlawfully and without original intent.
@theonemouse
6 жыл бұрын
If you want to be really technical, almost all of the amendments in some way have been broken by the US at some point in time. I’d say most recently the first, second, and fourth amendments are most under attack right now
@IkeOkerekeNews
6 жыл бұрын
When has the Quartering Amendment ever been broken?
Thanks for the videos! I'm not sure what else to say but they are definitely fun (if a bit cheesy at times) and they have definitely helped me learn more about all these supreme court cases!
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
That means a lot, Bryson. Thank you. And yes, cheesiness is my speciality. Ha!
@blueseanomad7435
6 жыл бұрын
Good morning Mr. Beat! Thanks as always
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
Good morning! :D
@Forsaken_Outlaw
10 ай бұрын
Falls under “fruit of the poisonous tree” & all evidence is inadmissible in court!!
@gigiratliff5801
2 жыл бұрын
Your primary sources are a goldmine. Thanks so much!
@zyxwvutsrqponmlkh
Жыл бұрын
The fourth, with illegal internet surveillance, civil asset forfeiture and destruction of property when carrying out searches. But the second is a close second.
@mtk77621
Жыл бұрын
The insanity of sentencing someone to 7 years in prison for possessing porn is just... wow
@lolfacelolacc
Жыл бұрын
My history teacher told us she owned csem (child p0rn) so maybe is more serious than that
@mtk77621
Жыл бұрын
@@lolfacelolacc But that is not what she was accused of and found guilty of, and frankly I have never heard anyone talk about her owning child porn. If your teacher has a source for that I'd like to see it, but it sounds like she is wrong.
@jamesmiller5331
Жыл бұрын
The woman was shady AF and they were going to tack on everything that they thought they could. The "Rosa Parks of the 4th amendment" later went to prison for slinging heroin. What a hero. We don't have bomb making material. Just an illegal gambling ring.
@mtk77621
Жыл бұрын
@@jamesmiller5331 You don't get to send someone to prison for "Being shady AF". She didn't have bomb making material so I'm not sure what your point is there. And you don't get to justify mistreating someone by pointing out that they did something bad later in life, that's complete nonsense. It doesn't matter if you consider her a "hero" or not, the fact remains that she was sentenced to 7 years in prison for possessing porn, which is complete insanity. And that's not even to touch on how they obtained that evidence illegally.
@jamesmiller5331
Жыл бұрын
@Misha the Fridge nah I get it. Technicalities and all that. Can't get me for murder when all I'm doing is pimping and slinging dope. But I'll kid myself when I ask why the cops want to kick in my door. Cry foul and all that.
@nicholasdibari9095
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for taking my recommendation; another awesome video!
@siamiam
6 жыл бұрын
Darn! Don kings home was the bomb
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
You are relentless with the puns
@willowwhittenburg
Жыл бұрын
Hey I love your videos, I found out about your channel from school and I just have to say that your videos make me love history even more, keep up the good work.
@vcthedank
6 жыл бұрын
Great one Mr. Beat one of my favorites
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite cases, too. About time I got to it!
@swahgiilitiousyt8483
6 жыл бұрын
Hey, I'd Really Appreciate To See A Vid About No Child Left Behind In Detail. Btw Your Vids Are Good,Keep It Up
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
I will eventually get to that topic
@somethingelse9228
5 жыл бұрын
@@iammrbeat when?
@ashtoncollins868
2 жыл бұрын
President During this time: John F. Kennedy Chief Justice: Earl Warren Argued March 29, 1961 Decided June 19, 1961 Case Duration: 82 Days Decision: 6-3 in favor of Mapp (Warren, Brennan Jr., Douglas, Black, Clark, Stewart. Frankfurter, Harlan, Whittaker for Ohio.)
@AmericanFlintlock
6 ай бұрын
ty!
@ashtoncollins868
6 ай бұрын
@@AmericanFlintlock yw
@AmericanFlintlock
6 ай бұрын
are you saved by jesus?@@ashtoncollins868
@elijahfordsidioticvarietys8770
5 жыл бұрын
This is why American politics are so much cooler than British politics. We’re all about the constitution, and amendments, and the Supreme Court, they don’t have none of that!
@elijahfordsidioticvarietys8770
5 жыл бұрын
Only thing cool that they have, are votes of no convidence, the “shadow government”, and of course, the Monster Raving Loony Party.
@Compucles
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the U.K.'s system of government was built in such a patchwork fashion over so many centuries that it must be extremely difficult to judge many controversial issues.
@reakwon693
6 жыл бұрын
Did all the accused people from the Supreme Court briefs actually spent their time in jail until they had the opportunity for their appeal? I mean apparently it’s not unusual to wait several years until the lower decisions become overturned
@polandballofspace4226
6 жыл бұрын
Nice job! I think I'm going to show this to my civics class since we have end-of-course exams coming up.
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you, and so glad you can use it in your classroom! :D
@Compucles
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the exclusionary rule is pretty necessary at all levels, otherwise the police would have no reason follow the 4th Amendment in the first place! Sure, individual violations can be punished even up to being suspended or fired, but if everyone decides to ignore it on a casual basis, well, you can't just dump an entire police force.
@jonahansen
Жыл бұрын
Definitely the Fourth Amendment. You don't know the half of it.
@ThePooper3000
6 жыл бұрын
Wait, doesn't porn fall under the First Amendment? Is there a Supreme Court case that falls in favor of pornography as protected under the First Amendment (besides Miller v. California or Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson)?
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
This page sums it up all pretty well: courses2.cit.cornell.edu/sociallaw/student_projects/ObscenityFirstAmendment.htm "Obscenity" is such a hard thing to measure, basically.
@ThePooper3000
6 жыл бұрын
Alright, thanks.
@weknow256
11 ай бұрын
I agree the 4th I think the 1sr and 2nd are always being attacked consistently but the 4th right now the government seems to completely ignore all the time your see people pulled. Over out of the car being searched. Growing up I rarely seen it and when I did I always thought oh boy I wonder what they did…. Now there is a good chance it is nothing
@blueseanomad7435
6 жыл бұрын
Speaking of property rights, how about United States v. Causby?
@rangergxi
4 жыл бұрын
Kinda wish they struck down obscenity laws too... Guess you can't win them all.
@benjijacobs2049
4 жыл бұрын
I’d say the main amendments under attack are the fourth, first and second in that order, especially as technology increases and because the government says we need more security
@shirtless6934
4 жыл бұрын
So the constable blundered, and the criminal goes free, to prey on society?
@Compucles
2 жыл бұрын
It's a necessary evil to make sure there isn't blatant, widespread disregard for the 4th Amendment.
@PurpleGhost666
3 жыл бұрын
I still can't believe you have not yet reached a million subscribers
@ingridfortlavictoire5456
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture. I got a better picture of this story this way.Thank you Mr. Beat
@pjrt_tv
6 жыл бұрын
You didn't mention what the reasoning of the judges that voted against was.
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
They didn't think the exclusionary rule should be applied to the states.
@asahel980
3 жыл бұрын
I was expecting the video is all about inevitable discovery doctrine. which make illegally obtain evidence admissible.
@blindinginferno
6 жыл бұрын
Hey Beat! I actually live in Ohio! Westerville Ohio
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
I had to Google where that was. It appears you are just a couple hours away from where Mapp lived.
@willsmith5166
5 жыл бұрын
woah i am from Westerville too
@JayYoung-ro3vu
3 ай бұрын
@iammrbeat As you found out, Columbus and its suburbs are approximately two hours south of Cleveland.
@JayYoung-ro3vu
3 ай бұрын
@@willsmith5166I had college classmates from Westerville.
@TheLeagueOfTasteAndClassCorp
6 жыл бұрын
One of the most interesting SCB yet!
@tbrowntracyj
Жыл бұрын
What inspired your interest in history And When pursuing history how do you handle significant conflicts in records And Do you have a favorite library or research source material
@Missfenyxx
4 жыл бұрын
the picture you used for Don king wasn't the person who they suspected to be at dollree's house. you show a picture of Virgil @0:41 but later show the pic of Don king as being in her house... was this a mix up?
@abbyjayson6357
Ай бұрын
Do u have KOREMATSU V. US case
@jettjamespruitt9842
6 жыл бұрын
Hey Mr. Beat, I know this is Supreme Court Briefs. But may you cover the case Engblom v. Carey?
@MrGaming-kr5zb
2 жыл бұрын
The Police:Well there were 1000 bodies but we didn’t have a warnt
@Orange_Laowai
6 жыл бұрын
Do Kilo v. New London.
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
I totally forgot about that one. It's a great case!
@HistoryNerd808
6 жыл бұрын
Ghawk Kelo is one of the worst decisions they've ever made. Hopefully, if Trump gets another nominee, we can get that overturned since eminent domain cases are usually 5-4, conservatives on one side, liberals + Kennedy on the other
@Orange_Laowai
6 жыл бұрын
I know it is bad, but it needs to be covered.
@HistoryNerd808
6 жыл бұрын
Ghawk Not disagreeing with you. Honestly, it needs to be covered because it is such a bad decision
@RemingtonRowland
6 жыл бұрын
Oooo Mr bent , Prometheus ,what firing knowledge to give us Mortals today
@HistoryNerd808
6 жыл бұрын
For the amendments most under attack, I would say the 2nd and 4th. At least SCOTUS is hearing a lot of cases on the 4th though. Hopefully, the 4th is restored with the Carpenter case this term. I love and agree wholeheartedly with Gorsuch's property rights interpretation(essentially he said the records belonged to Carpenter and therefore required a warrant, rather than a privacy interpretation). Interesting how the 18th and 19th century interpretation fits our modern technological world better than the 20th century one. For the 2nd, hopefully, SCOTUS hears more cases on the 2A because it seems like it's treating it as a 2nd class right
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
I didn't know about that interpretation by Gorsuch. I like it. He has been a bit of an enigma so far on the bench. I also agree the Court needs to hear many more 2nd Amendment cases. I mean, there have only been like 3 or 4 so far, right? Speaking of which, the US v Miller case is coming soon.
@HistoryNerd808
6 жыл бұрын
Mr. Beat This is a really liberal blog so it's very biased(just a heads up) but it explains his interpretation fairly well despite the obvious bias(even if it's a bias in favor of his interpretation) www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/11/in_carpenter_v_united_states_neil_gorsuch_showed_his_independent_streak.html I don't think he's much of an enigma, I think he's just an originalist in the mold of Scalia who was also willing to vote with the liberals on the 4A. And agreed on the 2A, the only major ones I can think of off the top of my head are Cruikshank (which I know nothing about), Miller, Heller, and McDonald. There was a case in 2016 where SCOTUS ruled unanimously that stun guns are protected called Caetano v Massachusetts but that's not a major case.
@HistoryNerd808
6 жыл бұрын
Mr. Beat That link is from only a day or 2 after the oral arguments in Carpenter
@PolarisSGL
4 жыл бұрын
The second Amendment for me
@ugoewulonu4936
13 күн бұрын
THE SUPREME COURT DIDN’T CARE ABOUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT!!!…. …… Oh, in THIS case. Ok, carry on.
@Nonsequitor415
Жыл бұрын
Good video! Thank you.
@williamlehan4079
9 ай бұрын
Virgil Ogletree is a really cool name. That’s what I took away from this.
@jaye156
Жыл бұрын
Ah well thanks Don King without you this case never would've happened 😂😂
@aaronTGP_3756
2 жыл бұрын
4th amendment, easily. 1st, 2nd, 10th are also notable.
@techcommenter
6 жыл бұрын
What was the minority opinion of the court?
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
They didn't think the exclusionary rule should be applied to the states.
@HVACSoldier
2 жыл бұрын
It’s the 4th, 5th, and in Congress it’s the 1st and 2nd.
@llisagomez5706
2 ай бұрын
Excellent
@DagaenGolomb
10 ай бұрын
I've always said the 4th is the most attacked.
@ray495903314
4 жыл бұрын
the sex offender registry (while hugely supported) does violate the 5th, 8th, and 14th amendments)
@Compucles
2 жыл бұрын
It's no more double jeopardy than the many other things excluded to people with previous criminal records. Cruel or unusual punishment? Not really. Violation of civil rights or due process? Nope, since as mentioned it's perfectly legal to target former criminals in certain ways; while they won't get in trouble again as long as they follow the rules, so their due process rights are still intact as much as anyone on parole.
@ihaveseverefrootsnackism
6 жыл бұрын
Mr. Beast without the 's' xD
@tobyhorn9641
Жыл бұрын
Me beat the 2nd is the amendment under the most threat at this point in time
@ahmadgriffin9849
5 жыл бұрын
My hometown since I was born in 1986
@rohansaxena4751
5 жыл бұрын
Earl Warren is my favourite chief justice
@rvegas81
5 жыл бұрын
Thx!
@coldstonestunners
6 жыл бұрын
Good video and odd case
@Kylefassbinderful
4 жыл бұрын
"Only in America" -DK
@jasoncease6288
6 жыл бұрын
I'd say the 2nd is under some pressure.
@jamellfoster6029
2 жыл бұрын
*Mrs. Mapp just died in 2014 at age 91...
@zuffin1864
3 жыл бұрын
I see the junk in my pants everyday, they are what fall under obscene materials but only in picture form. I can own my junk in its original form just not as a picture lol
@sarweenabdulla7844
2 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot
@DarthCookieKS
6 жыл бұрын
C'mon Matt we had our test on this court case in my history class last week T^T
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
OH MAN. HOW THE HECK. I'm sorry. That's just really bad luck. :(
@DarthCookieKS
6 жыл бұрын
Mr. Beat It's fine don't worry lol. We only had to remember the outcome of the case and what it established. Still this video would've been helpful :(
@stalkinghorse883
6 жыл бұрын
You need to get a rimshot sound effect.
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
You like the rimshot? I have one somewhere on my hard drive.
@HandmaidenOfDistinction66854
6 жыл бұрын
Informative!
@smartyyoung7319
4 жыл бұрын
Fruit of the poisonous tree.
@kristinhall3630
4 жыл бұрын
idk dawg
@JayeEllis
2 жыл бұрын
These days, it's most certainly the 14th Amendment that's most under fire.
@marko96
5 жыл бұрын
I didn't catch it, why didn't the police just get the warrant?
@zacharyhenderson2902
5 жыл бұрын
They didn't have grounds for a warrant
@Prat-zi1ou
10 ай бұрын
Once🐷 always 🐷
@belindawoodson8981
4 жыл бұрын
Florida is the state that linger on
@clintonbreeden6970
4 ай бұрын
Only in Ohio 💀💀💀
@thatweirdodiego8641
5 ай бұрын
mr breast can i please have a band
@DavidSmith-su4wl
2 жыл бұрын
Isn’t there another case that allows evidence obtained illegally, as long as the person who found it was not a cop/lawyer/defendant? Or was that something I saw on law and order?
@KoreaMojo
5 жыл бұрын
I am unable to stop thinking how Ms.Mapp's name is almost my favorite stores name: Dollree you remind me of Dollartree
@streamer_services
2 жыл бұрын
Mr beat i like your hamburgers and chocolate barz
@jonesforallgaming7753
4 жыл бұрын
MR BEAT SIXHUNDRED
@paulwarren796
4 жыл бұрын
ALTHOUGH I WOULD RATHER LIVE SOME ELSE , IT ISNOT BY THAT MUCH ANYMORE.... I WOULD CERTAINLY RATHER LIVE HERE THAN WARREN MICHIGAN OR WHERE I CAME FROM....
@technologyproductions-ye3px
6 жыл бұрын
Are you a lawyer?
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
No, but it feels like I've been in law school the past year and a half. I do teach American government.
@danielmclean1940
6 жыл бұрын
Second Amendment
@Tim_Tam0_0
Жыл бұрын
Only in Ohio💀
@kmtforchina8916
6 жыл бұрын
The third!
@RemingtonRowland
6 жыл бұрын
Mmmmmmmmm
@lucaslevinsky8802
2 жыл бұрын
I agree with the police, Even tough the evidence was obtained "illegally" she was collaborating with a criminal, making a valid reason to make the evidence legitimate
@JeffreyMorse775
Жыл бұрын
it doesn't matter; they didn't get a warrant
@pazpat12
3 жыл бұрын
#overturnterryvohio
@ShihammeDarc
Жыл бұрын
Imagine you send the cops back to get a warrant and not getting rid of the evidence of your criminal activities before they come back. How can someone be this dumb.
@chrispenner8705
3 жыл бұрын
Second
@MrJimmy-fl2bn
Жыл бұрын
The 2nd amendment no doubt is the amendment most under attacked.
@love2jd855
Жыл бұрын
Only in Ohio:
@chrisnemec5644
6 жыл бұрын
Another great summary of things. Just out of curiosity, have you done any research on Conn. vs. Teal?
@iammrbeat
6 жыл бұрын
No I haven't, but will definitely check it out now.
Пікірлер: 244