🌏Get NordVPN 2Y plan + 4 months extra + up to 20Gb Saily data here ➼ nordvpn.com/hamptonlaw It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee!
@captintinsmith3774
Ай бұрын
This channel is HEAVILY Censored..... ☹️ In The Friends of Voltaire, Hall wrote: "I Disapprove of What You Say, but I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It" ~ Evelyn Beatrice Hall ~ "This quotation - which is sometimes misattributed to Voltaire himself - is often cited to describe the Principle of Freedom of Speech."
@jupitercyclops6521
Ай бұрын
(12 min in)- "Here's the bad news" Where was the good news? There was the minute or so about the couple with a privacy fence. 2 o 3 min of comercial & 13 min of rights violating rulings, policies, procedures, practices, and even laws!!!!! Are we (by we I mean yall)so used to rights violations being the norm, we don't even question obvipus rights and or oath violations
@3rdreichball525
Ай бұрын
The answer is yes you can. Just don't get caught
@BorderGuards
Ай бұрын
So they can fly 1 foot above the ground?
@Bambihunter1971
Ай бұрын
Beautiful segue to the Nord VPN commercial. 🙂
@corruptduboiscountyindiana5058
Ай бұрын
and yet we see the cops go nuts on people who are out with a camera
@raswerdelad
Ай бұрын
Cuz they bay-bays.
@abcdefg54321x
Ай бұрын
Ftp
@DavidShipman-cg5gu
27 күн бұрын
💡 2024 Anyone can buy a Camera or GPS 🚪 DoorBell Cam
@thecreamyone3606
4 күн бұрын
Word
@ranxerox692008
Ай бұрын
If it is being discussed openly on KZitem, that means the government has been using it for years and has already moved on to new technology.
@justinbuddy56
Ай бұрын
Invisibility camo probably already exists, we just don’t know it yet.
@ranxerox692008
Ай бұрын
@@justinbuddy56 I was thinking about technology that allows them to read our minds. I may start wearing aluminum foil lined hats.
@justinbuddy56
Ай бұрын
@@ranxerox692008 Whelp, I’ll tell ya that KZitem has been really really good at recommending me things that I’ve thought about and haven’t even said out loud. Might be time for the tinfoil hats.
@reatilekoketsomolatlhegi1068
Ай бұрын
You should probably watch his video covering how the police are already making use of high performance Infrared/Radio technology that can look past the very walls of your house! The surveillance tech is so high res that they can see objects being involved in a "hand-off". oh yeah and this tech can be implemented with police being a good distance away from the house in question too! Never trust any state, esp when they design laws in their favour all the time!
@reatilekoketsomolatlhegi1068
Ай бұрын
You should probably watch his video covering how the police are already making use of high performance Infrared/Radio technology that can look past the very walls of your house! The surveillance tech is so high res that they can see objects being involved in a "hand-off". oh yeah and this tech can be implemented with police being a good distance away from the house in question too! Never trust any state, esp when they design laws in their favour all the time!
@ronalddaub9740
Ай бұрын
Yes to all they will abuse it in every way they can
@dawnhoughton4533
Ай бұрын
And even in ways we can't imagine yet.
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
Yes they will! And we are suppose to believe they didn’t use drones at the Trump rally ?
@ColonelSanders-xo9hp
Ай бұрын
@@dawnhoughton4533they already are.
@Dazdigo
Ай бұрын
I can see the cops landing these drones on private property and using that as an excuse to trespass to receive them.
@TheCaptainSlappy
Ай бұрын
I hear you have a gas leak on your property right next to your meth lab, Daz. Public safety and all that, you know.
@-._--_.-
Ай бұрын
@@TheCaptainSlappy Excuse me it ain't no meth lab officer, them white crystals right there is high grade white phosphorus.
@emilyfeagin2673
18 сағат бұрын
I have giant pine trees. If it lands in there, they had better be able to climb up and get it
@fryguy714
Ай бұрын
If you give the authorities an inch they will take a mile absolutely not they should not be able to do this it's basically illegal search and seizure know where they season anything no but they're on your property with the camera and that is illegal search they're searching your property with a camera and that is illegal
@Gr8fullyDeadHead
Ай бұрын
When you give authority an inch they become a ruler.
@user-nd8cs3qx1v
Ай бұрын
@@Gr8fullyDeadHead; YUP been telling people that for 50 years
@tarpanc34
Ай бұрын
best grow your weed inside for now on...... like the hydroponics ppl do...lol
@Paul__FC
Ай бұрын
Sounds like warrantless surveillance 1:19
@Crunt2167
Ай бұрын
exactly 😎👍
@mikemann1960
Ай бұрын
Reverse Ono is except able.
@mikemann1960
Ай бұрын
Reverse Ono is acceptable.
@mikemann1960
Ай бұрын
KZitem is mad at me and keeps deleting my comments. Why, because I don't support their shareholders. My military friends will assist me from here on out to stop this. They allow speech to spread that I 💯 % support and have never been relieved of my 5th general order.
@user-kd6wq5fp7m
Ай бұрын
It is
@mauricio-wq5lu
Ай бұрын
Checks and balances has almost gone out the door.
@ZombiePanda1776
Ай бұрын
They write checks and we get stuck with the balance
@mauricio-wq5lu
Ай бұрын
@@ZombiePanda1776 True
@MMPCTV
Ай бұрын
All these neet exceptions were made by a conservative supreme court, including qualified immunity.
@dawnhoughton4533
Ай бұрын
As a nude sunbather in my fenced in back yard and have had government drones fly over, I DO consider this an invasion of my privacy.
@nxsecuresucks
Ай бұрын
If flying over 400 ft and is approved by the local air traffic controller, it'll legal. Since it is illegal to use those over 400ft, it is against the law. This KZitemr is clueless on actual laws. He's talking about a subject that he knows noting about.
@puckg2454
Ай бұрын
So, uh ... where do ya live...? 😅 😮
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
I can understand your feelings but at the same time unless your property is extremely large, people from outside your property could look in and see you as well. If there's a house/building next to yours somebody could sit up on the roof or a balcony all day and observe what's going on in the area, including your sunbathing. You would feelI invaded but legally it wouldn't be an invasion.
@punktalley
Ай бұрын
If you can be see from public you need to put your clothes back on.
@dawnhoughton4533
Ай бұрын
@@punktalley lol it's a private backyard with privacy 8 ft fencing. Only way to see is overhead. Which the drone went right over me and paused. Unacceptable.
@sardonic_smile_8752
Ай бұрын
I understand even insurance companies use drones to surveil home properties to scan for unkempt yards and use that information to deny insurance coverage.
@josefmazzeo6628
Ай бұрын
Report them to the FAA for illegal drone flyover.
@ADBLOCKER4YOUTUBE
Ай бұрын
The County Assessor here uses them to surveil property to decide tax rates.
@theophila214
Ай бұрын
Ugh, I hate it all.
@emilyfeagin2673
18 сағат бұрын
They do
@williammorrill946
Ай бұрын
"I was cleaning my shotgun and it went off!" Honest.
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
@@williammorrill946 that sounds like a valid secure to me!
@TheLittlered1961
Ай бұрын
Are drones a protected species? Pull! 😂😂😂
@user-mz4gn8df1x
Ай бұрын
Same thing happened with my crossbow
@dwainmcwilliams2043
Ай бұрын
You still get a ticket for dislodging a weapon. Possibly might even get an early morning wrong address SWAT raid.
@TheLittlered1961
Ай бұрын
@@dwainmcwilliams2043 depends on where you live and/or if you get caught.
@God-rn3ck
Ай бұрын
What if I try to spy on police departments like this?
@Isaac_132
Ай бұрын
You'll be arrested faster than you can say "I can't breeve!"
@puckg2454
Ай бұрын
I'll protect you 🎉
@brianphillips7696
Ай бұрын
Actually police property is public property so privacy laws shouldn’t apply. Lol
@ZombiePanda1776
Ай бұрын
You would have a youtube channel
@raspberrypimilitant2242
Ай бұрын
If it's not controlled air space and your authorized to fly ie your drone is under the weight limit for registration requirements and I guess meets the new air id requirements I would assume it's the same as recording with your phone or a camera the same police station?
@user-oo5be4xs4w
Ай бұрын
To be fair, when I've asked the "birds aren't real" people i saw at a gas station, they said, "No, we don't really think it's 'all' birds, but it makes enough of an impact as a slogan that people will start looking closer to see if SOME aren't." Made sense.
@lisabruner7018
Ай бұрын
I had a bird drone land on my roof when I had the,dogs in the yard. I have,never,seen one before, so I jyst,stared at it.
@user-oo5be4xs4w
Ай бұрын
@@lisabruner7018 I actually saw a dragonfly one. I thought I was imagining it until it suddenly dropped to the ground and sparked. 😳
@roberttharalson3172
Ай бұрын
Okay, we can't shoot down a drone, but is it possible to nondestructively blind it with a high wattage spot light? Modern CMOS light gathering arrays are not prone to burnout like the previous vidicon tubes, so there is little chance of damage, and if you project light spectrum from far ultraviolet to low infrared it would saturate the imaging sensor, effectively blinding it. This would be especially effective in municipalities using drones not registered with the FAA as they could not charge someone with, say, obstruction, without revealing the illegal drone's use. Even if they are registered you are not required to assist in an investigation and it could be argued that blinding it amounts to preventing unwarranted invasion of privacy. In effect, you are creating a "light fence" that the drone cannot see over.
@user-nd8cs3qx1v
Ай бұрын
I like your thinking
@pacificostudios
Ай бұрын
Sure, that's fine. Unlike the radio spectrum, there are no laws against shining lights. Moreover, since you aren't shining the laser at a human eye, using a green laser to permanently damage a flying camera should be lawful. I would argue that damaging the camera is not damaging the aircraft, since a drone with no camera can still fly.
@Keepskatin
Ай бұрын
How did you learn about the secrets of infrared, and stop giving the info away so openly.
@MajorBigBuds
Ай бұрын
@pacificostudios SCOTUS has ruled on shining lights at cameras, but it's against law enforcement on civilians that get violented multiple times daily.
@FallingStar1080
17 күн бұрын
@@Keepskatinsilence peasant knowledge is power
@Isaac_132
Ай бұрын
Hmmm ... a VPN and a search on how to build an EMP gun seems to be in order. 🤣
@TacPhoenix
Ай бұрын
Yup
@nxsecuresucks
Ай бұрын
Has to stay within certain power limits, and yes that's legal.. but how you do it isn't that... It's to deauthentication of the Wi-Fi packets being used.. If they're using a cell signal for operation, they're violating multiple laws... Depending on the factors at play
@turboprint3d
Ай бұрын
Need a ark and an antenna, maybe a shield to focus the beam . Could also be done with parts from a microwave , could be dangerous tho would not attempt if understanding of the subject it limited . Wifi 2.4 and 5.8ghz jammers are available online. And old satellite dish would be a good reflector to direct a signal in a small beam.
@danielvest9602
Ай бұрын
I thought the Institute for Justice just fought the "open field doctrine" and won.
@kingjamesgorden3
Ай бұрын
That relates to cops walking around on your property that’s outside of your “curtilage”
@i-m-bossride
Ай бұрын
In the state of Tennessee, yes. SCOTUS, though, has not ruled on the issue since they first created it.
@guyintenn
Ай бұрын
That was in May and..."the Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson affirmed that the Tennessee Constitution bars game wardens from conducting warrantless searches of private property." The case pertained to TWRA Game Wardens entering private property and placing game cameras. It effectively killed the "Open Fields" doctrine in TN that TWRA had been using for years. The ruling was in relation to the TN state constitution. The US Supreme Court would have to make a ruling on a case for it to be nationwide.
@chadkerwin4719
Ай бұрын
@i-m-bossride "the state of Tennessee" isn't what you think it is. It doesn't have physically defined borders with dirt, trees, people, etc 9n it. It's a business organization. It's not the same as the state known as Tennessee. Also, why would anyone care what "SCOTUS"rules on? As an American, the only "supreme court" that matters are a jury of your peers, drawn from your community. However, I'm going to assume you claim to be a U.S. citizen and/or a citizen of the United States, yes? If so, then yeah you should probably listen to what your owners tell you to do.
@guyintenn
Ай бұрын
@@chadkerwin4719 Your word salad means absolutely nothing beyond the reality you have created for yourself in your own mind.
@litemetal
Ай бұрын
What’s next? Dogs and cats spying ? FedEx is spying for cops .😢 We all have neighbors, who knows what they are uploading about our lives 😮
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
CIA used a cat with embedded microphones on Hitler
@e.v.squatch5835
Ай бұрын
@@craigrobbins3540 Close - during the cold war in the 1960s they did outfit a cat with a mic and transmitter and planned on releasing it into a public area to eavesdrop. The only thing they head was the sound of a car horn, the minute they let the kitty out, he got hit by a taxi. $22 million down the crapper. Ref: Operation Acoustic Kitty. Also Hitler was not alive when the CIA existed - during his time they were called the OSS (Office of Strategic Services) National Security Act of 1947 turned them into the CIA, though there was a 2 year period between the disbanding of the OSS and the formation of the CIA.
@litemetal
Ай бұрын
@@craigrobbins3540 😂😅
@CannabisCatog
Ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure FedEx and UPS already are equipped with cameras that snatched license plate numbers.
@xenaguy01
Ай бұрын
@@craigrobbins3540 Interesting. Espcially since the CIA didn't even exist until Hitler had been dead for nearly two years.
@weekendwarrior3420
Ай бұрын
Cops need a warrant to watch me with a drone, but what about my neighbour?
@ZEEKUPP
Ай бұрын
That depends on the state. The courts have not kept up with the technology. Currently only 18 states require a warrant for use of a drone over private property.
@weekendwarrior3420
Ай бұрын
@@ZEEKUPP So, if I live in one of those 18 and I'm not a cop, I can fly a drone over my neighbour's yard and look into his windows, right? I do already keep my blinds shut at night for this reason. I can imagine teenagers flying those drones and having fun - I remember how I was at that age.
@ZEEKUPP
Ай бұрын
@@weekendwarrior3420 It's one of those complicated legal issues where even though a warrant might be required it does not stop them from trying other things like get a view from a power pole or something. If you have a fence, it is supposed to mean that there is an expectation of privacy. I personally wouldn't help them see anything of mine by leaving curtains open or anything like that.
@weekendwarrior3420
Ай бұрын
@@ZEEKUPP About those 18 states - I suspect, all that warrant means is that, without it, any info they collect with the drone can't be used against you in court. Otherwise they are probably free to watch you as they please with the drone. Let lawyers correct me...
@puckg2454
Ай бұрын
Your Neighbor can watch you with OR without a 'drone' - try making friends 1st., then just ask him to be nice❤
@xyyx1091
Ай бұрын
So to fly drones on a private property for surveillance is legal, however they are building drones which look like birds...😂
@KennyG944
Ай бұрын
Hey, I was just bird hunting. How could I have known that bird was a drone?
@josefmazzeo6628
Ай бұрын
If you shot down a drone that looked like an eagle, would you be arrested for shooting down a drone or shooting down an eagle which is also illegal (and a felony too I think)?
@superuser8636
Ай бұрын
@@josefmazzeo6628No because a drone is a drone and not an eagle and I could affirm that there is a noticeable difference
@robertsmith2956
Ай бұрын
@@KennyG944 It was a little tough, maybe I cooked it to long.
@robertsmith2956
Ай бұрын
@@superuser8636 Then explain the guys rotting in jail for selling the cops baby powder.
@mickeycogan12
Ай бұрын
You said "fixed wing" and showed heliocopters. Fixed wing means not a rotating wing.
@StephanieSoressi
Ай бұрын
Drones are not fixed wing either.
@airadaimagery692
Ай бұрын
@@StephanieSoressifixed wing drones are a thing.
@stickman-1
Ай бұрын
"1400 agencies using drones.." Except the Secret Service.
@apacheturtleisland9462
Ай бұрын
bingo
@apacheturtleisland9462
Ай бұрын
bingo
@thatsreality5184
Ай бұрын
😂@@apacheturtleisland9462
@thatsreality5184
Ай бұрын
😂 yeah make it make sense .
@gregratcliff9831
Ай бұрын
Don't take Mt word for it. But lookup Fed-Ex spying for the government I believe it like 40,000 of their delivery trucks already have them in their trucks..a bunch of BS so much for living in a free country!!!
@darrinlong8038
Ай бұрын
Well the supreme Court needs to catch up
@Broadsamurai
Ай бұрын
The current Supreme Court would probably agree with drone surveillance.
@Frank71
Ай бұрын
Don't count on it.
@captintinsmith3774
Ай бұрын
@@Frank71Agreed! These "Men" in long Black Robes actually work against We The People most of the time.....
@williammorrill946
Ай бұрын
Is there money in it for them?
@LEK-we2hh
Ай бұрын
🤣🤣
@mistyblevins-stepp5285
Ай бұрын
"...and other bad actors (inserts Steven Seagal photo)...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@klwthe3rd
Ай бұрын
I know what was that all about? When is Steven Segal a bad actor?
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
I caught that also😂
@262run
Ай бұрын
Came to comments to see if anyone else caught that😂😅
@TDCWTF
Ай бұрын
@@klwthe3rd every time he breathes.
@robertsmith2956
Ай бұрын
@@klwthe3rd After about 250 donuts.
@JohnSmith-zi9or
Ай бұрын
VPNs don't make your internet data private or safe. The government can still see your data.
@lanceburke6236
Ай бұрын
Yes but it takes time and resources for them to keep dive and backtrace your worldwide web travels.
@JohnSmith-zi9or
Ай бұрын
@@lanceburke6236 If your VPN server is in the USA, they just monitor the internet traffic coming out of the server which is unencrypted.
@joefaraone977
Ай бұрын
Helicopters are NOT fixed-wing aircraft.
@StsFiveOneLima
Ай бұрын
Nor are drones (of the quad-copter type).
@raspberrypimilitant2242
Ай бұрын
But they are fixed fin aircraft 🐟 🚁 ❓ 😅
@christopherthomas6336
Ай бұрын
Apparently Donald Trump security team had no access this technology
@user-nd8cs3qx1v
Ай бұрын
Christopher Thomas 6336; That would've shown too many facts
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
I don't know how the security people missed that guy but it would have been impossible to keep himself obscured from a drone.
@stickman-1
Ай бұрын
That was not the Donald Trump security team. That was the Biden/Cheatle Secret Service that failed.
@tabathac444
Ай бұрын
@user-nd8cs3qx1v what is Christopher Thomas 6336?
@NANASplash
20 күн бұрын
Their drone request was denied.
@djs12007
Ай бұрын
I believe the FAA laws regarding drones limit the altitude above 400 ft. when going over private residences, anything below 400 ft. is a violation of privacy.
@LEK-we2hh
Ай бұрын
🤣🤣
@windrider65
Ай бұрын
That's for private citizens, not Government drones.
@nxsecuresucks
Ай бұрын
That is correct and it's an illegal trespass. This KZitem lawyer has no idea what he's talking about on this subject matter.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
That is not correct. In most circumstances the FAA altitude limit is 400 feet maximum. Drones (the small ones that we're thinking of in relation to this video) can only fly above 400' if they are within 400 feet of a structure and not in controlled airspace.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
@@windrider65 While I wouldn't expect the FAA to prosecute a remote pilot who was working for the government they are regulated under the same law. 14 CFR part 107
@davidjernigan8161
Ай бұрын
Between the crows, vultures, hawks, that hang around my house I may not have to worry about drones, that and all the trees.
@purdysanchez
Ай бұрын
Air rights typically extend 1000 feet above a property before the FAA gets a default easement for aircraft. Small drones are banned from going above 400ft. So, by default a drone would be encroaching or trespassing if it flew over private property. It seems like the law is pretty clear cut, it's just that a court opinion hasn't explicitly reinforced the law yet.
@LMYS5697
Ай бұрын
Tmk it's at least 365 feet according to 70 yo jurisprudence.
@BenJones-qn3tk
Ай бұрын
I'm in aviation and FAA laws say no flying below 500 AGL (Above Ground Level)
@jessealday8225
Ай бұрын
Learn from the Russians, electronic jamming.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
FCC violation. The FAA isn't happy until you're not happy. The FCC isn't happy until you're in jail.
@46babaganoosh
Ай бұрын
LOL, that's not working out so well.
@jimboha
Ай бұрын
"Fixed wing" vs. "Rotary Wing". Most drones are rotary, but that case you cited said "fixed wing".
@0blivioniox864
Ай бұрын
Jezus christ, wasn't there a Black Mirror episode about this kind of stuff? Yet another case of government taking cues from Hollywood.
@ReDivineMan
Ай бұрын
There is no separation between government and Hollywood. That’s why epsteins client list still runs the show.
@robertsmith2956
Ай бұрын
South Park had the best drone episode.
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
I bet both get their “ideas” from the same source… DARPA
@Hillbilly55-qk4yy
Ай бұрын
FTP!
@puckg2454
Ай бұрын
File Transfer Protocol? What are you talking about?
@GregZimdahl
Ай бұрын
@@puckg2454 I would guess he means F*** the police.
@ColonelSanders-xo9hp
Ай бұрын
@@GregZimdahlno, he's for the people
@jimmyking998
Ай бұрын
Are if they take the drums and fly up close to your bedroom window and see you when you are changing your clothes I know there is a lot of good cops but there is a lot of weird police officers 😔💔
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
Sounds more like a peeping Tom!
@BillNye-bj5vi
Ай бұрын
good cops? where
@justinbuddy56
Ай бұрын
The cyborg dragonfly just blew my mind. I’m a bit distraught.
@RIGGIDRICH
Ай бұрын
Now someone needs to make a directional jamming device😂😂. If a drone falls on your property, do you have to return it?
@mustafasfleas7342
Ай бұрын
Additionally, The FAA has stated that a home/land owner owns the airspace above their property up from the ground to "navigable air space". Navigable air space is defined by the FAA as 1500 feet above ground level and higher. So, how is it, that drones which are limited by FAA rules and regulations to not more than 400 feet above ground level are able to trespass above a land owners property???
@suebaxter301
Ай бұрын
couple years ago my oldest daughter notice there were drone flying over head of her home, cousin and aunt's home. one was even close to her aunt's home. they had like blue and/or red flashing lights. this went on every night and not sure even to this day why they were over their places
@windrider65
Ай бұрын
My drone has red and green lights on it like an airplane.
@suebaxter301
Ай бұрын
@@windrider65 interesting well this was in the night and there were several so the only thing they can think of was law enforcement spying on them...
@-._--_.-
Ай бұрын
Just think that now drones have high energy beam weapons on them. Sound familiar? Like the sentinels from Halos guilty spark mission. What if Halo was the future of our reality, and we are actually the Forerunners who created all the high tech.
@suebaxter301
Ай бұрын
@@-._--_.- well ukraine is using the US money that was "given to them" and making AI assault drones that kills so yeah doesn't surprise me any
@grumpygeorge
Ай бұрын
If a hawk takes down a drone, can the cops do anything about it? Asking for a friend…
@ronalddaub9740
Ай бұрын
F there drones
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
their*
@lestvee4948
Ай бұрын
"there"?? FFS!
@jaysonrees738
Ай бұрын
I actually build these little things. It's pretty weird how the rules are currently laid out, and often times quite stupid. The latest lawmaking that they're trying to push is known as Remote ID, which they expect anything weighing over 250 grams to have a GPS lock and emit a registered serial number, location, and pilot location. Of course, this rule has a huge number of holes in it, and the hardware is stupidly expensive compared to everything else on the machine. To date, I think I've found one person who plans to comply. This is out of hundreds. We feel like we're getting screwed for something that helps nobody, and hurts us.
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
Interesting !
@SushiArmageddon
Ай бұрын
Crazy how our taxes fund our own subjugation.
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
@@SushiArmageddon ain’t that the truth!
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
They are not trying to push remote ID. It passed over a year ago and went into effect earlier this year.
@jaysonrees738
Ай бұрын
@@jerseyshoredroneservices225 I say that they're still pushing for it because basically nobody has actually bothered with it yet. There has been such low interest in compliance that there wasn't even enough stock in place on their first try. That's why they had to delay it for six months.
@mxcollin95
Ай бұрын
One thing I would disagree with is that according to FAA rules an aircraft can’t get closer than 1000ft to anything over populated areas and 500ft to anything over sparsely populated areas or be in a position that in the event of an engine failure you would cause damage or undue harm to persons or property on the ground. I’m not sure exactly how those federal aviation regulations relate to drones but those are the rules for general aircraft.
@scotthultin7769
Ай бұрын
They can look through the side of your house and get a face recognition of who's in the house and where they are what are you showing us so far is nothing new they've had it out for 35 years
@tomeauburn
Ай бұрын
FAA rules on drones say 400 ft is highest you can fly. Most drone operators will not fly low about a house as they understand privacy concerns and don't want trouble. I had a neighbor ask if I was flying one low over his house. I told him I wouldn't do that but it wasn't me. I suspect it was the power company. He talked about shooting it down and I told him it's a federal crime.
@ghostbombl8034
Ай бұрын
Theu used to go higher back when they first started this why I got ridded of my drones because of the Nazis laws.Its not fun anymore it sucks its a money scam since drones price ate higher than they worth.Its sad.Who wants low 400 feet if they can go higher. I understand because its a safty thing for airline so on but it sucks freedom is gone when it first started. This why I quite gaming befor the scam s started they went most digital scamy downloads.Now its scalping money time.😅
@danhardin7243
Ай бұрын
I own my "Air rights" as well as "mineral rights!" IT has been proven in FEDERAL COURT!
@xenaguy01
Ай бұрын
It seems to me that since the SCOTUS ruled that aerial surveillance of a yard was lawful only if done with fixed wing aircraft from 1,000+ feet, any use of a rotary drone under 1,000 feet would be a 4th Amendment violation.
@deborahroy3528
Ай бұрын
This is a gross violation of our rights to privacy
@WexMajor82
Ай бұрын
Hello drone! Meet my friend, Mr. Shotgun.
@josefmazzeo6628
Ай бұрын
Followed by a free government paid stay at the Hotel Graybar.
@brianhillis3701
Ай бұрын
@@josefmazzeo6628it just crashed into my pond. No you cannot come on my property to retrieve it. Good luck with the gators if you try.
@-._--_.-
Ай бұрын
@@brianhillis3701 "Sir looks like your exotic animal licence has just expired"
@jma8352
Ай бұрын
with the ring cameras the police have access to them should be illegal. so insurance company's are using these drones without your permission. By the way, they have the tech to see through your walls now, so what is to stop them from using them?
@eilenekellogg-ki2br
Ай бұрын
If the cops have all of this equipment to spy on me, they must be awful board on the job.
@Down4dhunt
Ай бұрын
The Gov owns the air! Thats why you get a fed tax on your cell phone bills to use it lol
@MadyJay76
Ай бұрын
The Birds Aren't Real movement was actually a joke made up by the creator, they don't really believe that...
@Boondok_Dwaeji
Ай бұрын
The "movement" is commentary on how little evidence and critical thinking we will do for a "loudly proclaimed truth" that is factually incorrect.
@Trashpanda5568
Ай бұрын
don't forget the remote ID broadcasting
@fleonard4
Ай бұрын
Baby bird sees its mama flying around. That's not wrong at all... LOL
@rinyotsu2.0
Ай бұрын
So what you're saying is its illegal for the police to shoot down my drone too?
@AB-ws2sj
Ай бұрын
Had a cop spying on my through drone use once before in Canada Ontario (Peel Region). I live in a corner house #1 with a forest in the back yard past the fence. They hovered over the trees and were just looking through my light window. ( I can’t prove that last part but this region is notoriously anal and charges the most in the country for police fees a whopping 36.5% of tax in the area goes to the police force.)
@joehannah1343
Ай бұрын
If you live in one of the States needing a warrant, does the state then need to provide land owner with a copy of warrant Before execution of warrant??
@gregfalco4528
Ай бұрын
Almost 10 years ago, my grandmother was reaching the end, and I thought to take her to see the ocean one last time. We were standing on a seaside cliff looking out at the horizon, when I noticed something hovering about 20 feet past the cliff and 10 feet above us. It was something the size of a large man's hand, and it looked and moved just like a dragonfly, with a small camera where the head would be. It was almost silent, and the way it moved made it hard to spot at first. Once I started staring right at it and became visibly angry that some fed or local PD would be spying on my family when we were on a day out, it moved on the the next group of people on the ciff, then the next group of people, and so on until I lost sight of it. They've been using these drones for a while, and by now, they probably don't look like anything we recognize.
@robevans5222
Ай бұрын
Since drones are legally considered to be aircraft, and therefore have certain flyover rights afforded to aircraft, I would like to see the courts also clarify that they must conform to FAA-enforced minimum altitude regulations, as follows: § 91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General. Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes: (a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface. (b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft. (c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.
@josefmazzeo6628
Ай бұрын
Hmmm - seems to be a conflict here. Can't fly above 400 feet, but can't fly below 1000 feet (of the highest point) in congested areas....seems like a loophole for city dwellers.
@nxsecuresucks
Ай бұрын
So called drones AREN'T AIRCRAFT. That's the issue everyone is having. The FAA can't just claim they are aircraft by redefined in the definition... This was just taken up with the supreme Court.. I've posted this countless times on this thread that this so called lawyer has no idea what he's talking about on this subject matter. He's making a KZitem video for clicks... Stating caselaw of cases that had bad lawyers. Then not telling you the full details of the real case
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
If you're familiar with part 91 regulations you should also be familiar with part 107.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
@@josefmazzeo6628 400'? Where do you see that in 91.119 I don't understand what you're talking about
@ChrisTietjen_00
Ай бұрын
91 regulates manned aircraft and part 107 regulates unmanned aircraft. You're reading the wrong set of rules. Also most localities have voyeurism laws that protect you from "peeping Tom's" which would apply when non-police drones are being invasive to your sense of privacy. Under part 107 a drone is still considered an aircraft and you cannot interfere with its flight without facing legal consequences.
@falcorthewonderdog2758
Ай бұрын
The first question is how do you know who owns the drone? Didn't the supreme court ruled you own the air space above your property and can shoot down drones that enter your space?
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
No the Supreme Court did not rule that you can shoot at drones, or any other aircraft. Weather people technically own the airspace or not is irrelevant. It was decided a long time ago that the airspace is a public domain that anybody can use according to FAA regulations. Even if you own that airspace, you cannot regulate it.
@sharonducci7089
Ай бұрын
More than a miles above your home it is not.
@JerryWhite-ee5hy
Ай бұрын
There is no distance that restricts drones. You do not own the airspace above your home. Not even one inch. Period. They can fly over one inch and it's perfectly legal. And if you shoot it down,you are being recorded shooting down a private aircraft. Not smart.
@Happy-dx5sn
Ай бұрын
Question how would anyone know is was a police drone? Does it wear a badge?
@46babaganoosh
Ай бұрын
It will ask you to ID yourself.
@bassplayaman1
Ай бұрын
In Virginia, it's illegal to use a drone to peep inside someone's window. I'm not sure how this applies to law enforcement, though.
@sharonducci7089
Ай бұрын
That’s a little government over however if it’s being used in the right way it might be OK but if they are within a mile of your home above it within that mile it is against the law your tress passing that’s real estate law base
@ethanp1erce
Ай бұрын
BIRDS ARENT REAL!!!
@theophila214
Ай бұрын
I understand now, LOL.
@axxeminister
Ай бұрын
There used to be a thing called "Air rights", which meant the space above your property was also yours. Not sure if it applies anymore.
@kevinwest7912
Ай бұрын
"Their people?" Hell no! I don't belong to them!
@Yggi2424
Ай бұрын
Violation of 4A
@user-et4dr7dm8d
Ай бұрын
They use eco location too in my area
@HoneyBadgerxo
Ай бұрын
Me: feeding government birds 🐦 thinking birds just love my house. #delusional lol😂
@kromeknifemind
Ай бұрын
Steven Seagal had me dying! 🤣
@user-et4dr7dm8d
Ай бұрын
Look at trumps blood ear , it had a drone blocker , seriously i got 📸
@smileyhugar2657
Ай бұрын
trees help hide my yard. l have checked it out from satallite
@mattalford3932
Ай бұрын
Minimum altitude over buildings is 500 feet generally. Drones are allowed to fly from ground level to a maximum of 400 feet. Helicopters are different
@timothyhults2549
Ай бұрын
Stalking and a peeping tom can be charged for a crime.
@user-et4dr7dm8d
Ай бұрын
They took speed camera always from school in my area
@Handle1969
Ай бұрын
Glad to know this. Founders? What would they say? Seriously! Full Confession: I was on back porch. Swatted at a large fly that landed on picnic table. Flushed it. Turns out it was a warrantless drone. I’m now on a list. Have hired an attorney. Told to remain silent if asked by police if I have ever stated “I wouldn’t hurt a fly”
@robertsmith2956
Ай бұрын
All hail the Gigashadow......
@MayLing-LE
Ай бұрын
😂You had me at the photo. Busted out laughing ... thats no bird.
@AshGreen359
Ай бұрын
BIRDS AREN'T REAL It's not a real thing, it's a joke, you got trolled. It's an old joke
@user-et4dr7dm8d
Ай бұрын
They have some looking like road runners
@chcarroll5164
Ай бұрын
road runners only fly a short distance at relatively low height
@user-et4dr7dm8d
Ай бұрын
@chcarroll5164 but they can jump high an glide long distance an very fast
@craigrobbins3540
Ай бұрын
😂. I saw one that looked like a coyote.
@user-et4dr7dm8d
Ай бұрын
@@craigrobbins3540 I'd catch it
@RvnKnight
Ай бұрын
There's one big thing with any police/non-hobby drones: they require a flight plan being filed with the local air traffic control. That is an FAA regulation. It also has to registered with the FAA if it is not strictly hobby use only. If you ever have that police drone flying overhead, ask for warrant, FAA registrations, operator name and certification, and the FAA approved flight plan.
@dawnhoughton4533
Ай бұрын
So the large weird white vertical drone 30 ft above me while I was nude sunbathing in my private fenced in back yard had a filed flight path? Where would you file a freedom of information request, or find out who owned the drone? Is there a local FAA? Like, how do you really ID it?
@RvnKnight
Ай бұрын
@@dawnhoughton4533 the FAA is a federal agency but you may be able to acquire whether or not a flight plan was filed for a drone near that location. That can tell you who it was if there was a flight plan. Otherwise, once you find out the who, as long as it is a gov agency, file a FOIA request. Otherwise, you have some digging.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
100% not true. The law that regulates small unmanned aircraft systems is 14 CFR part 107. Show me where it says anything about a flight plan.
@RvnKnight
Ай бұрын
@@jerseyshoredroneservices225 different places have that requirement, such as with Texas., which would apply for me. Here is the requirements link, change (dot) to a period. www(dot)txdot(dot)gov/business/aviation/uas-services.html
@RvnKnight
Ай бұрын
@@jerseyshoredroneservices225 it's part of the law here in Texas, so maybe it's different by location. Remove the spaces for the link. www .txdot. gov/ business/ aviation/uas-services .html
@timmanagh2328
Күн бұрын
Police aircraft, planes and helicopters are clearly marked as police vehicles. How do you know a drone belongs to the police? A few years ago in my cottage area ( in Ontario, Canada), thieves were using drones to survey private property to see who was not at their cottage so they new it was safe to break into ( this was reported by the police). In this area there are strick rules about where you can fly a privately-owned drone to try to prevent this. Real estate companies have to fill out paper work with the authorities to use a drone to photograph a listing, but often still get the police called to check them out. I don't know if police use drones here, but I will be keeping an eye out for large birds.
@supermankent1041
Ай бұрын
The key to freedom is to have "Land" NOT "Property"
@vongimbelgroup
Ай бұрын
Haha, birds aren't real, lol. That's why they locked us down during covid-1984. They had to do a systems upgrade.
@pacificostudios
Ай бұрын
You didn't mention that jamming a drone flying basically on your property is also unlawful under the FCC.
@karezaalonso7110
Ай бұрын
6:40 talking about fixed-wing aircraft while showing helicopters LOL
@AMERICANPATRIOT1945
Ай бұрын
What is the difference between a police drone and a police helicopter? The drone is only a problem if the drone is flying so low as to be a real invasion of privacy, i.e. it is being used to look into windows not visible from the street without a warrant.
@haydenbrannan7187
Ай бұрын
just an fyi those people don't actually believe that all birds are drones... that is a satire movement.
@rubybackert3612
Ай бұрын
If cops are using drones to scope out 911 calls doesn't that make their response time longer??? So if someone is in a life and death situation and they have to wait for the drone to send back the message and THEN the police come, that person could be dead. How do they justify that?
@traildriving
Ай бұрын
Exactly
@Kurtdog63
Ай бұрын
Several states, including my home state of Kentucky, considering legislation regarding private use of drones for hunting purposes. Currently, some drone operators are using drones to locate large game animals, like deer, that have been shot by hunters that were unable to locate the possibly deceased animal. Some hunters don't considere any use of a drone to assist hunters as ethical. The problem with searching for a potential downed animal, is that the drone operator, and the hunters that have hired them, are also scouting the location for live deer while searching for the dead one. This tells in them in real time where all the deer are so they have the intel on where they can hunt those deer immediately. Here is another thought. How would you like to be hunting, fishing, or camping out with your family and another member of the public thinks they have the right to use drone technology to spy on you and your activity regardless of where you are at? I was jogging at a public place and a drone went by me within 50 feet. The cameras and zoom lenses are super high resolution and film you as if you were 10 feet from the drone. Just because technology is available, doesn't mean it is ethical or doesn't violate someone else's right to privacy, even if on public lands.
@jerseyshoredroneservices225
Ай бұрын
If somebody is out in public they have already waived any claim of privacy. It's called public for a reason By the way, everywhere you go, all day long, every day, you're being recorded on people's cameras. Why freak out about the one that happens to be drawing a lot of attention to itself with the buzzing noise?
@exile220ify
Ай бұрын
I love how you showed a pic of Steven Seagal when you said "bad actors" :)
@lukedame8310
Ай бұрын
theirs a case in Oklahoma on this very subject
@BigMobe
Ай бұрын
Where did that trained flock of hawks come from?
@tecknows
Ай бұрын
I would say "Yes, take it out." No one has any business flying anything in your air-space. The more land you have, the more rights to the airspace you have to a certain point. Zoning matters too. However, everyone has the right to privacy and protection of themselves and their own property. Any un-marked device near my home can and will be immediately disabled, regardless of Agency. Why? Truth be told, how do we know it's an agencies and not a Cartel? These days, it's better safe than sorry.
@coolraul07
Ай бұрын
8:07 - "...and other bad actors..." Damn... Steven Seagal out here catching strays!
@DeleteLawz1984
5 күн бұрын
Great Video, Hampton Law. Thank You
@pinschrunner
Ай бұрын
On July 1, 2024, it became illegal for Florida HOAs to inspect backyards and be in your business, including with drones, peering over fences, etc. I would like to see the enforcement of that one. Great, I formative content as always @Hampton Law
@dougied3449
Ай бұрын
Thats why private use of signal jammers are banned.
@ADBLOCKER4YOUTUBE
Ай бұрын
THIS Supreme Court? HA! I'm surprised the Court hasn't allowed drones flying around your living room…
Пікірлер: 1 М.