Lens quality, versatality and ease of use far surpasses the weight of a lens. So glad to see Canon made this lens an internal focus zoom, and not the extended barrel zoom like the RF 70-200 - here's hoping the next version of the RF 70-200 2.8 will be an internal zoom.
@nathan-serny
10 ай бұрын
I hope the same for the 70 200
@EktorTsolodimos
3 ай бұрын
I used to hate the 24-70 in the first 5 years of my career as a full time pro. The past 3 to 4 years it's the lens I use 95% of the time. I still own a lot of primes, but I hardly use them anynore. The 24-70 is usually at 3.5 or in the studio around f/11. I already tested this out and it's amazing. Might buy this one and never take it off of my camera. Therefore also no need do ever again clean the sensor. My backup camera can then use any specialty lens I might need. The more I know, the more I value ease of use and flexibility. Sounds familiar? I own a 200 2.0 and I have used it once haha. My 70-200 I have used a least a thousand times.
@theusbadenhorst
10 ай бұрын
Amazing versitility great review!
@guntherswart9464
8 ай бұрын
thank you
@NorwayHikesTrails
11 ай бұрын
Great review 👍
@guntherswart9464
8 ай бұрын
thank you
@AndileMasikane
11 ай бұрын
An awesome review 👌🏽👌🏽
@guntherswart9464
8 ай бұрын
thank you
@painter662
9 ай бұрын
I have watched about 6 reviews on this lens… it seems like nobody wants to like it. But they can’t or don’t ever say why. I am guessing it’s different. You and Fro are the only two who have shown actual pictures taken with it. Your wedding shots were fabulous. I’d think if there were a lens with this focal range all at a defined aperture speed it would be a joy to work with. It’s a fricken L… what’s the problem??? I’m serious one guy didn’t like it becouse he preferred his 24-70 and 100-400 combo because they cover the standard ranges so completely… help… you got a 30 mm gap right in the middle… this thing fills it… what’s going on? Anyone know?
@guntherswart9464
8 ай бұрын
This is an incredible lens. Depending on the genre, and obviously the finances, the RF 24-105 F2.8 and an RF 100-300mm would be everything you need or close to it. regardless of a second lens, the RF 24-105mm F2.8 is unbelievable. I think people want bigger apertures above better zoom. The weight of this lens felt perfect and the internal zoom has a roll on effect. When we tested it on a gimbal, zooming had minimal effect on the balance of the gimbal. Where the barrel extension of the 24-105mm F4 and the 24-70mm F2.8 made a more significant change in weight distribution for a gimbal setup.
@undifinder6643
13 күн бұрын
This lens replaced my RF 24-70mm f2.8, RF 100mm macro and keep my 100-500mm, having just to lens for almost everything is so much better now and extremely versatile, the weight is very balance especially when its zoom to 105mm, at 24mm its a bit to the camera. The bokeh effect is equal to Canon cinema line and IRIS ring is basically changing t-stop, and because of this combine with it being 2.8, sometimes the effect feels more f2 than f2.8 too. I use it with R7 and surprised it can resolve details so well, macro MFD down to ~7in at 24mm and ~9in at 105mm. However, I would neverrecommend buying this lens without having trade ins to help with the cost.
Пікірлер: 12