If you are able to follow this explanation you already know the Casimir effect.
@LeNoLi.
Ай бұрын
i agree. i wanted to know more about it because it was so confusing, and now i'm just as confused. i guess this topic is not for amateurs.
@nikolaveljkovic428
Ай бұрын
@@LeNoLi.Neil Tyson explained it simply as allways.
@mortyrickerson6322
Жыл бұрын
The level of detail you divulge to us is exquisite. Thank you so much for sharing
@Andrew-rc3vh
Жыл бұрын
I have news for you. The full explanation is probably a full postgrad course on QFT and it is all maths. The trouble is the model used to understand it has its own issues, such a renormalisation.
@pukulu
Жыл бұрын
This is an excellent presentation without vague generalizations.
@austincali510
Жыл бұрын
I just found your channel looking for info on Plasmoids. Amazing content! Now i get to binge watch for a while!
@SeethePattern
Жыл бұрын
Welcome aboard!
@OrpheoTreshula
Жыл бұрын
Gold rush.
@JoeDeglman
Жыл бұрын
You should check out an Anthony Peratt video 'Peratt and Petroglyphs' as a starter video.
@MatthewHolevinski
Жыл бұрын
No don't listen to Joe, check out the precession video list first :)
@JoeDeglman
Жыл бұрын
Actually, the precession series follows the Jim Weninger idea that the Sun and other stars orbit around Arcturus and around our local Chimney, or a plasma model in the spiral arms of the galaxy. Stars orbiting around the local chimney or Arcturus, and the observations of star forming beehive clusters, is a place that would fit the idea of a Marklund convection that would match the Plasma Universe models to the procession model. If you assume that there are up to 9 standing waves nodes along each spiral arm and that the star forming beehive clusters orbit those nodes, as Jim Weninger claims for his precession or Artcurus model, then you can compare and contrast the two ideas. In My Opinion, Jim's idea and precession does fit right into the Plasma model presented by Peratt. Both are a good place to start.
@JoeDeglman
Жыл бұрын
According to Nikola Tesla, charged particles are condensers of the ether medium; and Charles P. Steinmetz, charged particles are condensers of a dielectric. Per plasma double-layer theory a double layer sets up between the two, at close range, keeping the two charges apart. CERN experiments show that when trying to get a so-called antiproton to merge into the spherical boundary of a positron requires an auto resonant frequency. An energy input at a specific frequency to get the charged particles to overcome that boundary or double-layer force that keeps them apart. Quantum computing experiments also show a magnetic bubble exists around all charged particles and atoms that can be controlled by electric forces, as a 'qubit.' It seems that when you try to model charged particles and coulomb forces at short range, without accounting for an ether medium condensation around such charged particles, a paradox always occurs. So even in a vacuum there is always an aether medium that will permeate said vacuum that must be accounted for at close range as force to be dealt with. According to a government document, 'Successes and Failures of the Constituent Quark Model,' charge doesn't migrate out of the nucleus per the quark model, with election decay, but charge manifests outside of the nucleus, per the Nikola Tesla model of an electron as a charged particle with a magnetic medium condensed around it. An interesting video to watch on this is What is a Mole? The relationship of Avogadro's number and particle charge by Jeff Yee ... At Energy Wave Theory.
@curiousmind9287
Жыл бұрын
You are a bonafide genius of popularization for extremely difficult subject matter. 😊
@barrydysert2974
Жыл бұрын
Gareth, It is the graphics, so precisely timed to Your narration, that allows me to understand these heretofore impenetrable topics. i barely passed Algebra and Geometry with a D. i am convinced that was only out of the goodness of the teacher's heart! i have been with you for perhaps three years now and the EU folks five years longer. You and Your team are gifted educators! God bless You for showing me more and more of the pattern. You give me courage to face my remaining years !:-) 💜🙏⚡️
@SeethePattern
Жыл бұрын
Thank you kindly!
@soheil527
Жыл бұрын
@WeekendTradesman AI algorithms created by the elite
@mr.tinkertrain8510
Жыл бұрын
@@SeethePattern casimir effect is a fake, there's no demonstration proof on the internet at all
@fkeyvan
Жыл бұрын
Nice job. You covered many disparate theories of the Casimir effect which is not covered in popular media
@robbie8142
Жыл бұрын
I didn't need to look at the comments to know how precisely popular your channel is, but of course I did. ....... Absolutely Outstanding!! 👻🚀
@LobsterHorde
Жыл бұрын
This of course shouldn’t be confused with the Kashmir effect, which is caused by Led Zeppelin.
@justanotherguy469
Жыл бұрын
The Van Der Waals force is fundamental because it does not depend on the phenomenological microscopic parameter, the dielectric constant. Simply brilliant.
@giles5966
Жыл бұрын
macroscopic
@justanotherguy469
Жыл бұрын
@@giles5966 TY
@thenatureofnurture6336
Жыл бұрын
The "heuristic shortcut" is a great way to explain the majority of 'understandings'.
@andrewbodor4891
Жыл бұрын
There is a simpler explanation. The dense aether near the earth causes micro gravity pressing the plates together. The same dense aether around the earth creates the gravity that we experience on a grander scale. In both it is dense impermeable space or the aether at work. Matter pushes the aether aside; the aether presses back with "gravity". Matter, mass, can not occupy the same "space" at same time so the aether stretches like a girdle around the matter. This affect also causes what is incorrectly called "time dilation". Time is NOT dilated; the movement of the atoms constituent parts are slowed down. Refer to a cesium clock running slower. Time did not slow down, the clock did.
@imwelshjesus
Ай бұрын
In other it's the woo used by the baby jesus and his lying bottom feeding followers.
@aryansingh7209
Жыл бұрын
Bro you're new but the quality is comparable to youtubers that are here for a decade. Another gem of science KZitem. Your gonna boom soon.
@noneofyourbusiness4133
Жыл бұрын
Nope. Check his popular videos and scroll down about ten or twenty. Conpspiracy nutter. Do not trust a WORD he says.
@laneesarey6616
Жыл бұрын
He has chat gpt right his scripts lol
@trollmcclure1884
Жыл бұрын
Gotta binge watch everything on this channel once I have more time on hands. Sky Scholar became too difficult to digest
@douglasstrother6584
Жыл бұрын
Sky Scholar is pretty meaty!
@hanss1754
Жыл бұрын
Sky Scholar is complete pseudoscience. Is this channel a melting pot of EU cranks?
@lawrenceleske3470
Жыл бұрын
Cosmologists have shown that the "vacuum energy" must be a bit smaller than theory suggests: about 10^-120. This is a bit too close to zero to measure presently. Thanks for the clear presentation wrt van der Waals!
@googleyoutubechannel8554
Жыл бұрын
I suspect the better we get at measuring 'vacuum energy' the more it will remain a bit smaller than theory suggests, unless theory finally suggests zero...
@andrewferris8169
Жыл бұрын
The Van der Waals picture is almost identical in that the force is still ultimately caused by virtual photons, but emanating from the charge exciting the vacuum, instead of the boundary conditions of the vacuum as a whole. It also includes the resonance of the charges around the molecules as you mentioned. In the papers you pointed out, it's mostly just arguing that the force comes from the Interaction Hamiltonian instead of the pure EM Hamiltonian. The boundary condition view is a way of thinking probabilistically and adjusting probabilities based on what interactions are even possible based on the situation. Because the situation can limit what's allowed. Van der Waals doesn't immediately capture this, but ultimately does predict it as well, so both pictures are 100% valid as of now. I wouldn't say Van der Waals is more detailed, but it does explain from the bottom up, rather than top down.
@mcasteel2112
Жыл бұрын
Ive been sharing this channel everywhere I roam. I see a jump in subs!
@zzyzx2297
Жыл бұрын
Cant wait to drop this one on my professor!
@ExistenceUniversity
Жыл бұрын
Report back on how hard he laughed at you!
@TheOoorrrr
Жыл бұрын
Finally some quality condensed matter physics on KZitem 🤩
@jensanchez3646
Жыл бұрын
THANK YOU!! I'm SOO greatful for you! I've been trying to understand the Casimir Force, and you helped me learn so much in just a few minutes. ☺
@deltr0n
Ай бұрын
Great explanation. Finally clicked for me. Thank you!
@RichardKCollins
Жыл бұрын
See the Pattern, To represent 3D fields, it is relatively easy to find many orthogonal representations. For atoms and molecules the groups often start from the Schrodinger equation, or the nonlinear Schrodinger equation. It is also possible to use 3D Fourier and wavelets. There are many choices. Those "plates" are the wrong shapes and likely the wrong properties for real nanoscopic, picoscopic and femtoscopic objects and regions. But there are mathematical and computational methods for any shapes now. The Coulomb force in 1/r^2, but the magnetic dipole force is 1/r^4. And the magnetic force is a vector. But it is well understood and documented. The corresponding potentials are 1/r and 1/r^3. At close distances, the forces between two particles having electric charge and magnetic moments usually required calculating the full multipole expansion. If you think of the 3D fields involved, then the time dependent field at ever point can often be represented in one of the many orthogonal basis sets. And often those are readily available on the Internet, and often packaged in to many of the tools. Python seems to have gained popularity, but there are many more. I hope you will look more deeply at tools and data people are using when they do "real" calculations. The energy density of the Earth's gravitational field is about equal to the energy density of a magnetic field of about 380 Tesla. In black body terms, that is roughly 1500 electron Volts per particle, so it has a peak in the soft x-ray region, extends through the XUV, but covers all frequencies. As you found the frequencies larger than the object are not so easy to use to represent the fields of those small things. But, you can use two large wavelengths (very close in frequency) where the difference fits into the right range. The "high harmonic generation" methods are what people use for laser and plasma excitation of energy densities in the XUV and soft x-ray region. And all of those are candidates for directly measuring and modifying fields, which I classify under "gravitational engineering" methods for the Internet as a whole. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
@andrewbodor4891
9 ай бұрын
What you are missing is that "gravity" works in all directions. Gravity is not an attraction between atoms of baryonic matter. Gravity is actually quantum space pushing matter together. Matter and matter naturally repel each other. Quantum space does not just give way; it contracts and compresses and exerts a force on the matter we call gravity. This compressed quantum space is all around us concentrating near the surface of the earth. This force does not only direct itself towards the center of mass but also sideways; thus the Casimir effect.
@alexleung842
Жыл бұрын
I like the theory that Casimir = le sage push gravity = EM field fluctuations = strong force
@DeezNutz-ce5se
Жыл бұрын
What are you trying to say?
@Boogaboioringale
Жыл бұрын
Le sage shadow gravity theory is priceless
@ExistenceUniversity
Жыл бұрын
@@DeezNutz-ce5se He is saying he doesn't know anything but buzz words
@guytech7310
Жыл бұрын
Probably NOT *vacuum energy* but electromagnetic forces acting on the plates. Consider that in some materials, the Casmir effect is repulsive (From Wikipedia): "There are few instances wherein the Casimir effect can give rise to repulsive forces between uncharged objects. Evgeny Lifshitz showed (theoretically) that in certain circumstances (most commonly involving liquids), repulsive forces can arise." I suspect we have still have major mis-interpretations of this effect leading the wrong conclusions.
@ExistenceUniversity
Жыл бұрын
No charge
@AshersAesera
Жыл бұрын
Wouldn't you be able to prove it's related to the Van der Waals forces by bringing an EM field nearby? If it is Van der Waals, half the time the attractive force would be temporarily reduced due the molecules having to realign with the EM field when you bring a like charged end to the plate with the like charged outer face. Where as, if it was vacuum energy it's just induce a stronger attractive force via inducing polarization. Another method I can think of is to have 3 plates. Vaccum energy would push the same plates in just as much, where as Van der Waals would fascilitate a lower attractive force due to the distance of the two plates being further apart.
@dsm5d723
Жыл бұрын
This is the reason why Einstein and Relativity was more "viral" than ether-based explanations. The desire for a binary of the seen and the unseen is probably built into us by the nature of opposition in language. We say the absence of a measured quantity is itself a referent, like darkness is the opposite of light rather than an absence of light.
@andrewbodor4891
8 ай бұрын
Try looking at the force and the wavelengths as being caused by the bunched up or compressed quantum space around large masses. We call this gravity. Matter pushes quantum space aside and quantum space pushes back; they do not mix. The dense quantum space does not just push downward but also in ALL directions. The plates in the experiment initially repel each other but when close together the quantum pressures overcome the repulsion, pushing the plates together. You may call this having to do with wavelengths, but more likely having to do with the wavelengths of quantum space.
@JamesWebbKilledTheBigBangStars
Жыл бұрын
Wonderful as always. I may be thinking of resonating orbitals at subatomic scale; always stabilizing the potential energy between atoms, like objects falling from high unstable energy potential to lower stable state; i.e. gravity (or electrostatic effect) at extreme end of the scale. As two objects get further apart from each other (eg. in acceleration) the force which acts at the smallest scale is increased in magnitude (high energy potential), while as when they come closer the same acting force decreases, but never disappear unless the two objects become one.
@barrywilliams991
Жыл бұрын
It would be interesting to conduct a similar experiment with superconducting plates.
@kingofnothing2260
Жыл бұрын
It still works even if in a vacuum shielded from electromagnet interference because of virtual particle momentum, which wasn't talked about unfortunately
@Ramkumar-uj9fo
10 ай бұрын
How does string theory explain the casimir effect String theory doesn't directly explain the Casimir effect, but it can provide a framework for understanding the underlying principles that contribute to this phenomenon. The Casimir effect is a quantum mechanical phenomenon that occurs when two uncharged, parallel plates are placed very close to each other in a vacuum. The plates experience an attractive force due to the quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. String theory, being a framework that aims to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity, can help in understanding the Casimir effect through the following aspects: 1. **Vacuum Fluctuations:** In string theory, the fundamental building blocks are tiny, vibrating strings. These strings have specific vibrational modes that correspond to particles, including the photon (the carrier of electromagnetic forces). Just like in quantum field theory, string theory also incorporates vacuum fluctuations. These fluctuations in the string vibrations can be connected to the fluctuations in the electromagnetic field, which are responsible for the Casimir effect. 2. **Quantum Gravity:** String theory provides a consistent framework for quantum gravity, which is essential for understanding the behavior of the gravitational field between the plates. The Casimir effect involves both quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field and the gravitational field, and string theory attempts to unify these forces. 3. **Higher Dimensions:** String theory typically involves extra spatial dimensions beyond the familiar three dimensions. While these extra dimensions might not be directly observable in the Casimir effect, they could play a role in the overall picture of how forces between objects at small scales are mediated. It's important to note that while string theory can offer a more fundamental and unified perspective on the forces involved in the Casimir effect, it doesn't provide a specific calculation or prediction for the exact magnitude of the effect. The detailed calculations of the Casimir effect still rely on quantum field theory and the properties of the electromagnetic field, rather than being derived directly from string theory. ChatGPT ♥️♥️🌹🌹
@uplnejvypatlanec1692
11 ай бұрын
great explanation and clear English (important for us non-English speakers) ... I also feel a similar force when the walls of my stomach get too close together and it makes me hungry ;-)
@blorfkarpo
Жыл бұрын
Another explanation I read a long time ago is that virtual photons, being an electron moving forwards in time and a positron moving backwards in time are atracted to charges in the plates.
@googleyoutubechannel8554
Жыл бұрын
Yes, you can suggest all sorts of hocus pocus when our best 'theories' don't constrain much of anything really...
@alwayscurious413
3 ай бұрын
Thanks for this - brilliant job!
@critical-thought
Жыл бұрын
Dumb question (I know nothing about this subject), are the experiments performed in the dark?
@rudypieplenbosch6752
Жыл бұрын
I worked in the same building, great to see it again.
@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591
Жыл бұрын
I always look to vacuum cleaners as the mechanical way to create attractive forces. You move air out of the way to move things into a vacuum cleaner. So you should move other things out of the way for other forces. Just move gravity out of the way, and scale down the Aether. If the Aether is the backdrop of space then its scale represents the smallest distance you can cross, and that would be your vector scale for a location. So as the Earth moves forwards the vectors move together, and you would have to cross more vectors at the front of the Earth's orbit than the back. This would naturally correct gravity, and stabilize the speed of light.. which is what Michelson/Morley saw. Then the smallest vector would work in the Casimir effect as the smallest distance you can cross being forced between the plates. Then you can also use that for Entanglement as the smallest distance you can cross stretched over a larger distance.
@DeathValleyDazed
Жыл бұрын
Your comments makes sense but I’m not smart enough to say why exactly. I remain puzzled and fascinated by the Aether. I’m stuck keeping my fingers crossed that Gareth Samuel is really onto something while “Seeing The Pattern.”
@ExistenceUniversity
Жыл бұрын
Vacuum cleaners =/= vacuums
@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591
Жыл бұрын
@@ExistenceUniversity So? You should read what I wrote instead of making an irrelevant reply.
@ExistenceUniversity
Жыл бұрын
@@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591 I did, none of it makes any sense. You are just saying buzz words you heard before in random ways
@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591
Жыл бұрын
@@ExistenceUniversity Such as? I mean you can't just say I used buzz words, as I don't see any buzz words in the text.
@JJbm4233
Жыл бұрын
I’m not gonna say this Lightly. This is an important statement from anyone who in the 80s want to do is trying to be in BIGBANG cosmology to the modern shall we say electric universe cosmology. Thank you for continuing the legacy of Wal Thornhill! God bless you, Walt and everyone in the thunderbolts KZitem channel as well as See the patterns.
@stephanboivin
10 ай бұрын
You should look at Milo Wolff articles that lead to Jeff Yee Energy Wave Theory. As neutrinos, electrons and nucleons generate spherical longitudinal waves. The interference between the two plates becomes significant when the plates are close and the point of minimum énergie is when the resulting amplitude is minimal creating a force that attracts the plates. In this theory the medium has Planks density, charge is the wave phase. So electromagnetic interactions are just interference interactions of the spherical waves generated by the charged particles.
@rustysawblade2591
Жыл бұрын
As a Manchester united fan, I can confirm that I have witnessed the Casemiro effect and it is indeed a powerful force! 😜 I think you would enjoy the "before the big bang" series on a channel called skydive Phil (I think that's the name). Lots of information about all the conflicting ideas of how we got here. I have been alternating between that channel and yours for the last few weeks for my existential crisis fix lol.
@assemblyofsilence
Жыл бұрын
I’m trying to understand how zero point (assuming it exists) would NOT be a factor in the Casimir effect. If all space is permeated with energy of various wavelengths and boundary conditions filter some of this energy how could this not play a role in the observed behavior?
@pehliks
Жыл бұрын
Because these virtual fluctuations do not exist in reality. You can never measure any virtual particle. It is just an artifact of theoretical calculations.
@StephenGoodfellow
Жыл бұрын
The Casimir Effect challenges the most basic tenets of Galilean/Newtonian/Einstinian physics, in that these rest on the assumption that all objects fall at the same rate in a space vacuum. If what the Casimir Effect infers is correct, then the closing of plates must be an expression of pressure, anywhere in the Universe. it follows that there is nowhere you can roll two balls of different mass, where the larger mass does not arrive sooner than the lesser - providing you make the ramp distance long enough to see the effect. This holds true for the vacuum ball and feather experiment, provided the ball and feather are released a significant distance from a gravitational target. We will observe a measured difference in arrival time of the two objects, ball arriving before the feather.. Galilean/Newtonian/Einstinian physics work fine at 'short' distances, but the expected outcome breaks down over sufficiently longer distances. The argument that the effect is so small as to be insignificant would be an ill-conceived objection when one considers that the minute discrepancy observed in the precession of Mercury was a foundational observation in the verification of Einstein's paper on Relativity.
@jacobfreeman5444
Жыл бұрын
A good question to ask is why they would think a value is too small to matter? What are they doing to limit outside interference that makes it possible to conclude something is negligible? Perhaps the answer to the paradoxes of our understanding is in our assumptions we make.
@charleswalker7010
Жыл бұрын
For some reason I kept thinking of gravitational interaction between two objects on a microscopic scale while watching this.
@denzali
Жыл бұрын
Those name mentions across the top of the screen murder the experience I must say. But an amazing channel none the less 😊
@bazoo513
Жыл бұрын
6:09 - "H" in "Hrvoje" is pronounced (as are all other letters - three syllables (yes, "r" plays a role of a vowel), six phonemes.) Not a very easy pronunciation for a native English speaker... Excellent video.
@scottchilds5726
9 ай бұрын
I would love to see the table of elements 500 yrs from now. Perfect
@chaorrottai
Жыл бұрын
It honestly would not surprise me it it was a canderwalls force origin because it's an attractive force, but it would deppend on how irregular the attractive force is. I would place the plates close together and look for fluctuation, the vacuum fluctions should create small oscillations in the force of attraction.
@Corey_Brandt
Жыл бұрын
I just want to say that you have the coolest KZitem intro ever 😁
@curiousmind9287
Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@kingofnothing2260
Жыл бұрын
No mention of virtual particle momentum? Why not?
@philoso377
Жыл бұрын
There are three things in the universe. 1. Energy 2. Matter and 3. Vacuum-Aether. One and only one : - Energy : electricity only - Matter : subatomic particles. - Medium, Substrate : vacuum-Aether. All mechanical activities, gravity and inertia can be traced to 1, 2 and 3. Explicitly, matter isn’t energy and energy isn’t matter. Gravity is extrinsic of matter. Gravity is intrinsic of vacuum-Aether Aether attaches to all matter pulling them together with a tensile force = G = 6.67408 × 10-11 N m2 kg-2. Light is 1 and 3 and not 2.
@uplnejvypatlanec1692
11 ай бұрын
E=mc2 => energy = matter
@briankleinschmidt3664
Жыл бұрын
The empty space between the valence shells is the void. It is the boundary between negative and positive. There is no room for it in space so it moves forward though time - pulling matter along with it.
@GamesBond.007
Жыл бұрын
The polarisation of the atoms is caused by the earths magnetic field...because when you move a conductor through a magnetic field a current is induced in the conductor which in turn generates a magnetic field which polarises the atoms of each side of the conductor, turning the plates into magnets (while they are moved). So because the direction of the polarisation will be the same for both plates, on the inside of the plates there will be different or opposing charges, which will create an attraction force between the plates...
@johnyrocket223
Жыл бұрын
thank you for explaining something a layman like me couldn't call out. When I first heard of the experiment for the casimir effect (only a month ago) the first thing I thought was "wait doesn't metal weld itself in a vacuum if you make the faces of two plates touch? why wouldn't you explain this casimir effect with the same logic(Van Der Walls force)? where does vacuum/negative energy come in?" don't get me wrong. I still believe that funky stuff will happen if you hold two "seas of electrons" close enough to interact but not touch. We may even find a new propulsion system out of such a configuration if it encourages an energy gradient. However I'm not holding out for a miracle.
@moddel
Жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation! In the Van Der Waals approach, what is the source for the energy of the polarization fluctuations? Is it zero-point energy? If so, then both approaches are based on the same energy source, but in one case they’re spread electromagnetic field fluctuations, and in the other case they’re localized.
@peterhodgson3696
Жыл бұрын
The polarization fluctuations are the source of energy for the attraction between the two plates. i.e. the two atoms in a polarized state are in a lower energy state than they would be otherwise because opposite charges are closer together on average.
@radinelaj3932
11 ай бұрын
It is like two magnets which pull each other. It there is a plate of metal or wood between two magnets they will pull each other ( in distance 1-3cm) the force of magnet penetrate the wood plate which is between two magnets.
@schmetterling4477
11 ай бұрын
We are... by erecting a potential barrier around free space. It's just one more effect of boundary conditions.
@xenphoton5833
Жыл бұрын
Very nice presentation 👍
@vanhetgoor
Жыл бұрын
The Philips Natuurkundig laboratorium was one of the greatest achievements of the N.V. Philips Gloeilampenfabriek. The work they have done in this lab was astonishing and it was way above and beyond what ordinary technical research is. it is gone. Don't know where the remainings are.
@GamesBond.007
Жыл бұрын
2:20 There is no external field present, except for the EARTH's MAGNETIC FIELD. Which is what causes the polarisation in the atoms of the metal plates. Basically when you move a conductor through a magnetic field, a current is induced in the conductor, which in turn generates its own magnetic field, turning each conductor into a temporary magnet. So because the direction of the magnetic polarisation will be the same for both conductor plates, on the inside of the plates there will be different or opposing charges, which will create an attraction force between the plates.
@markfernee3842
Жыл бұрын
A very nice presentation with good referencing. It seems then that the detectability of the quantum vacuum falls to squeezing. The LIGO and VIRGO gravitational wave observatories use a squeezed vacuum to increase the sensitivity of their instruments. This would seem a little less contraversial as there would be no effect in the classical picture.
@DSAK55
Жыл бұрын
This seem like a major kick in the ass to the idea of vacuum energy
@lexpox329
Жыл бұрын
I understood very little of the 2nd half of the video because I am not versed in anything but basic Newtonian physics, but it sounds like a video I could digest and learn some new things by googling the definitions and piecing together what I am missing.
@NullStaticVoid
Жыл бұрын
seems it would be easy to test this with an analogue. Put two plates in a tank very close to each other. fill the tank with a medium. Perhaps oil or water. Then excite the medium with a transducer using pink noise. If the effect is due to wavelengths "not fitting" between the plates, then they should move together due to the energy distribution of pink noise.
@STONECOLDET944
4 ай бұрын
There's one way to put this to bed, try to obtain an energy surplus from using vacuum energy, if its impossible, it's van der walls if it's vacuum it'll be possible
@philoso377
Ай бұрын
What does this differ from a well known effect by which finely polished prism flat surfaces pushed tightly to one another leaving insignificant air molecule in between will continue holding together in the ambient and in vacuum?
@l0lzers1990
5 ай бұрын
Great video!
@GamesBond.007
Жыл бұрын
Its caused by the earths magnetic field. If you move 2 conductors in a magnetic field they will be magnetised and attract each other. So moving them in the magnetic field of the earth creates a current in each conductor which in turn creates a magnetic field for each, which causes them to attract.
@Velereonics
Жыл бұрын
5:24 the emphasis here murders me. One would expect it to me on "micro" as this contrasts "macro" but instead the emphasis is on "scopic" which they both contaon 😢
@Schtuperfly
Ай бұрын
So its not gravity but gravity is mass attracted to mass so there is gravity between the plates. How much stronger is the Casimir effect than the gravity? And what about magnetism existing in the plates. Could the friction of the vaccuum energy have slightly magnetized the plates? All the positive and negatives seem to line up in a very familiar way. Could gravity, magnetism and the casimer effect be somehow related. I love how we know little about gravity. It's such an opportunity.
@F.E.Terman
Жыл бұрын
Love the accent. And as a bonus, it will automatically get all the Dutch names pronounced correctly! 😊
@Crowbars2
9 ай бұрын
So, if the casimir effect is greatest at the distance of about 100 protons (83 femtometers), how come no one has decided to stack a bunch of metallic plates together with a distance of 83 fm? Some say that the Casimir effect could be used to create an alcubierre warp drive. If the Casimir effect truly is because of vacuum energy, why hasn't anyone made a stack of metallic plates with 83fm distance between them to bring these microscopic effects into the macroscopic?
@glenfoord9652
Жыл бұрын
This is just gravity. A good demonstration of how gravity actually works. Lagrangian/ casimir gravity.
@GamesBond.007
2 ай бұрын
But why do the plates have to be made from metal ? If these quantum flatulations existed, it should make no difference what material the plates are made from. They should attract even if they are from plastic. The fact that metal plates are needed to demonstrate this effect shows this is a pure magnetic effect.
@RickLambert963
Жыл бұрын
In engineering/physics, a field is a geometrical/mathematical representation (shape) of an energies interaction with matter mapping the strength and regional differences in strength; a conceptual description of a phenomenon with physical presence. A field can be classified as a scalar field, a vector field, a spinor field or a tensor field according to whether the represented physical quantity is a scalar, a vector, a spinor, or a tensor, respectively. In communication we are referring to both the physical presence and the descriptive representation simultaneously. Example, the magnetic field was strong enough to damage the computer; obviously it's the physical presence doing damage and not the descriptive representation. The Higgs fields is thought to be in a metastable state, meaning that while it's not currently undergoing any changes, it's also not predicted to be at its lowest energy level. It's a false vacuum with a lot of potential energy. Vacuum energy is an underlying background energy that exists in space throughout the entire Universe.The vacuum energy is a special case of zero-point energy that relates to the quantum vacuum. The effects of vacuum energy can be experimentally observed in various phenomena such as Cavendish experiment, spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect and the Lamb shift.
@OrpheoTreshula
Жыл бұрын
Damn Lambert, you still 'round? Kickin' it!
@seanhewitt603
Жыл бұрын
So , if two plates are separated by mere nanometers can produce an electric charge, could the tiny capillaries which allow for the passage of oxygen and nutrient molecules into living cells and their mitochondria also create an electrical charge?
@ExistenceUniversity
Жыл бұрын
No charge
@Purple.mind...Honored.one.
Жыл бұрын
3:50 Because I've subscribed to the electric universe theory, This makes me think that all the Other forces Are various different wavelengths Of electromagnetism, After all lights is just on the form of Electromagnetism, And I don't exactly get how this strong and weak nuclear force Are a part of Electromagnetism But apparently that's a thing, And it hasn't been proving yet but it makes sense that gravi is as well.
@timhensley1297
Жыл бұрын
Maybe it just the strong and weak forces, operating over a large area and short distance.
@mossig
Жыл бұрын
Nope, no vacuum energy. I'm curious to what happens at the openings between the two plates in both ends of the two plates at one nm? If there was vacuum energy pushing the two plates together and they where not fixated to a measuring device, there is no way they would join evenly at the same time. It would touch one end before the other because there can never be a even distribution of energy everywhere. The force between the plates should be bubble like at the end of the plate gaps. To take into consideration is also that the artificial vacuum chamber in it self if made of metal is and is a Faraday cage, that changes any electric or magnetic field present outside vs inside the test area.
@walter--
3 ай бұрын
how would the vanderwaals view be a solution here? Or at least there should be an explanation why there would be a consistent polarization over both plates that result in a next force.
@seabeepirate
Жыл бұрын
It seems like the light theory for the Casimir effect is easily testable. The testing apparatus is simple enough, the measuring is the hard part.
@revimfadli4666
Жыл бұрын
So the vacuum energy explanation is analogous to modelling holes as actual positive particles vs the explanation that they're simply electron voids?
@thomasciarlariello3228
Жыл бұрын
I am rather skeptical or equivocal about claims of "Casimir Effect" since it could be electronic noise in of a circuit or it could prove how a vacuum has a texture.
@valkyrie_592
8 ай бұрын
I am getting a very uneresistable urge to call this out for nonsense because it is just the bare basics. I can see this being a deeper problem that can be solved by quantum mechanics and further experimentation on what happens when you would be able to push the plates through eachother, since there is nothing suggesting this is not possible, quite the opposite.
@MikeSmith-cl4ix
2 ай бұрын
So if I understand you correctly we're not sure which force causes the effect but we believe it's one of these two what other experiments have they done in this area have they tried slowly bringing a third plate to the stack see if it changes the pressure between the original two?
@GamesBond.007
Жыл бұрын
The plates could also attract because of their own gravitational field...right ? Because F=Gm1m2/R^2, so if they weight 1 Kg each, then when set at R= 0,000001 m, F=6,67*10^-11/10^-12=6,67*10=66,7 Nm
@drdca8263
Жыл бұрын
The scaling with distance between them is different for this force than for gravitational force. I think proportional to 1/(distance^4) iirc.
@mrhassell
3 ай бұрын
I wonder if this has any bearing on Malcolm Bendall’s Thunderstorm Generator. It certainly sounds like it.
@thebogsofmordor7356
Жыл бұрын
1:36 "Retardation due to the finite speed of light" is how I describe my childhood.
@MrofficialC
Жыл бұрын
What happens if you put 3 casamir plates next to each other? like> ||| will the middle plate stay in the same spot or will it go to one side or the other? My guess is it will stay in the same spot if it's perfectly balanced but I could always be wrong
@sebastianstewart6894
Жыл бұрын
But hydrogen can't be turned into a metal plate as such there is almost no metal that doesn't have an innate charge that will interfere with the results.
@whirledpeas3477
Жыл бұрын
What if the 2 plates are made of glass, not metal ????
@olegc.7877
Жыл бұрын
>polarisation of the medium You missed the word "ether" to describe that effect without magical virtual parties.
@davestorm6718
Жыл бұрын
Is there a reason why the plates are metal in these experiments? Would other materials exhibit this effect? Surely, they've done this with other materials, right? It would seem that, if the force were due solely via the van der Waals effect, then different materials would have differing forces (depending on the atomic separation in the lattice structure of the material). If the plates are metal and the wavelengths are in the RF range, wouldn't they impart the same momentum regardless of the distance of the plates?
@AnRodz
7 ай бұрын
Vacuum energy concept seems more fundamental. That said, I'll try to find the paper on VdW forces
@Thermiable
Жыл бұрын
But force implies energy. Where did it come from?
@drdca8263
Жыл бұрын
What do you mean by this? If you just mean that a force implies like, a change in energy per change in position, then ok, but like, what do you mean by “where does it come from” then? Do you mean “what is the force between”? It is between the two plates. What is your question?
@egay86292
Жыл бұрын
this is liturgy of mystery, priestspeak simultaneouly explicating and obfuscating, a high mass meant to seem elevating and communalizing, but leaving, at last, us congregants sitting exhausted in the same pew, superpostioned with the same blank stare.
@omekafalconburn9202
Жыл бұрын
Would this affect help corroborate Wal Thornhills Dipole gravity model perhaps?
@tomnoyb8301
Жыл бұрын
Zero-point energy, Dark-energy and Dark-matter all share a hand-waving component.
@arielperez797
Жыл бұрын
Even though they are not charged so do not have electromagnetic forces present....could it be possible that a small amount of magnetism is present because of the atoms that build everything up? And once they start to move towards each other....this strengthens the magnetism due to a charged particle in motion becoming stronger? So as it moves closer...the magnetism ramps up? Lorentz force i believe it is called.
Пікірлер: 331