As an Englishwoman I find my Celtic heritage both fascinating and mysterious, which it is for many reasons, one partly being because like many others have commented, English Celtic heritage is overlooked or even unknown. I'd love to see more videos on this. I'm so proud of being a Briton alongside my English, Welsh, Scottish and Cornish brothers and sisters. I hope more of us explore and shine a light on our Celtic culture because being a Briton is much deeper than being a citizen of Britain on paper.
@samdaniels2
Жыл бұрын
How is it deeper out of curiosity?
@GerMFnU1848Sax
Жыл бұрын
Same
@ChromiumCastle
Жыл бұрын
@@samdaniels2 being British is paperwork, being a Briton is blood
@samdaniels2
Жыл бұрын
@@ChromiumCastle What does that even mean?
@ChromiumCastle
Жыл бұрын
@@samdaniels2 I'm not even sure what you don't understand. Seems pretty self evident. Read more books I guess
@izzyperera9798
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for covering the Celtic history of England. It is very overlooked in my opinion because the English language is Germanic rather than Celtic. Personally, I am English with some Welsh roots(and French and Mediterranean but that is from my non-Celtic part of my family) and my family strongly identifies as Celtic despite being told that we are English so we are not actually Celtic. My Great Grandmother even claimed to be directly descended from Boadicea due to her surname being derived from the name of her tribe, the Iceni. I ended up doing a DNA test just over a year ago to confirm my family’s believed heritage and, although the ancestry website I used didn’t tell me explicitly, I was able to put my DNA file into a website which matches you with ancient people found throughout the world to conclude what your ancient heritage is and mine came out a little over 3/4 Celtic, mainly native English Celtic and surprisingly, quite a lot of Scottish Celtic. He only non-Celtic heritage I had was from my French and Mediterranean heritage. It just goes to show that although many English are not in the slightest Celtic and fully Germanic, some of us are full natives. I imagine if I were to just test my Mum, it would be pretty much 100% as that takes away the French and Mediterranean.
@BETOETE
3 ай бұрын
interesting to hear that about you and the origin of England nut DON'T write the Latin way of the queen of the Iceni, just Boudicca.
@jenlewren
2 ай бұрын
What website did you use to find the relation to celtic heritage please?
@BigMacLawson
8 ай бұрын
Loved learning about my history and where I came from!
@TRex-dd4ze
7 ай бұрын
Me too! And it's especially important these days when so many are trying to erase our identity and our history.
@user-bt2od3yw1b
3 ай бұрын
Great video. England will always still be part Briton/Celtic like the rest of Britain with the country still having Briton/Celtic DNA. The place name "England" may have changed but the people and culture haven't. There are still many place names in England with Briton/Celtic names. We should have an Official Celtic Nations Flag like the rest of Britain
@JoeBlowUK
Жыл бұрын
I took a DNA test, which showed strong Welsh connections. I have traced my ancestry back to the 1600's, which shows my family from being mainly from Ormskirk in West Lancashire, then down to Chester and parts of Wales. I also have 15% Nordic in my DNA, which makes sense, as Ormskirk was part of a route which the Vikings used when arriving from Ireland and travelling through (what is now) England. I always questioned the Anglo Saxon heritage, and felt more of a calling towards a Celtic connection. This video helps explain that.
@muslimcrusader5987
Жыл бұрын
Anglo-Saxons were a ruling elite in Britain, never the ethnic majority. They were wiped out centuries ago during many Celtic British peasant uprisings and foreign empires. Today the British are entirely Celtic. They’re just culturally Anglicised (except the Welsh - they honour their roots).
@barnowl5774
Жыл бұрын
My DNA ethnicity analysis is 73% Welsh, and 18% English and North-Western Europe ie. Anglo-Saxon. The people in England are NOT British and NOT entirely Celtic.
@colonelturmeric558
Жыл бұрын
Yes they are barnowl, or do you mean to tell me that ~70,000 saxons replaced nearly 3 million britons?
@neilog747
3 ай бұрын
This is an Anglophobic post and nothing more. There is no evidence of research here.
@legolasgreenleaf1961
2 жыл бұрын
A really overlooked topic, and a great history, essentially swept under the carpet. The people of England are just as 'british' as any welshperson, and even today the Welsh still refer to England as Lloegr, the ancient name for the areas east of the severn, and south of the humber. The people were the Lloegrwys or Lloegrians, and were of the same ancient stock as the Cymry. When you consider that before 1700ad there was no celtic or even saxon consiousness in britain, you have to wonder what happened to our original histories, that celebrated victories over the Romans for example. Now the Romans are placed on a pedestal, everything dug up of any importance is immediately labelled Roman. NEVER British.....really strange....especially when a so called 'Roman' villa lies unexcavated in south Wales. This place is known to have been built for a British king 'in the roman style' and is dateable to around 200ad. Which is awkward, as we are supposed to be uncivilised 'celts', stomped over for 400yrs. Fishbourne roman palace gets funding and a visitor centre, Caermead gets turfed over. Skullduggery is rife in academia it seems🤔
@redwaldcuthberting7195
2 жыл бұрын
Not really as Yorkshire has the highest percent of autosomal 'Anglo-Saxon' contribution at around 40 percent per person hardly a uniform spread of ancient British ancestry. I'd also say there was ''Saxon consciousness' in Britain before 1700CE as place names indicate folk identified as Saxons like West Seaxe, Suth Seaxe and East Seaxe. The wergild 'man payment' for a Briton ie a Wylisc man in Wessex was lower than that of an Englisc man...
@lightfootpathfinder8218
2 жыл бұрын
@@redwaldcuthberting7195 Im from Yorkshire and I recently did an ancestry DNA test. It came back that I am 97.6% "English" and 2.3% scandanavian. I'm not sure whether English refers to Anglo-Saxon,Celtic Briton or a modern mixture of both??. I presumed it would be more Anglo Saxon as if it was Celtic Briton surely Welsh would have come up on my results
@pricklypear7516
Жыл бұрын
The PUBLIC is interested in all things Roman, so that's why a lot of what we actually see is focused there, not because of any "academic skullduggery." If you want a much more inclusive survey of England, hang out with linguists. You'll get all the "Celtic and Saxon consciousness" you could possibly want.
@legolasgreenleaf1961
Жыл бұрын
@@pricklypear7516 i would say the public have had romans rammed down their necks for so long, that the PUBLIC have no other knowledge of their ancient history, as the education system has been centralised for well over a century. Ask any Welsh person about the kings of south wales and they will probably say they've never heard of any, as we are all taught in school- the romans were great, the normans defeated the saxons in 1066, henry the 8th had 6 wives, 1st and 2nd world war and president kennedy. Thats pretty much it. Funny how they dont tell you that Caesar had his butt kicked twice and ran home with his tail between his legs, or that Caerleon York and London were established long before rome. There's a drive to play down every part of British history, and 'big up' the invader. Shouldn't we be teaching our own history? Here's something to consider.....no one in Britain thought of themselves a being 'celtic' before 1700, funny that innit? We must be the only nation on earth that has TWO histories , the former replaced due to political and religious manouvering. And ridiculous accusations levelled at one man of around 1800, to discredit the original history. How could Edward Williams forge an ancient british alphabet in around 1800, when there are 9th century bodleian library documents displaying this kymric script. So scullduggerry just might be the correct word, and don't forget the old saying......"history is written by the victors"
@user-bt2od3yw1b
3 ай бұрын
I'm glad people are finally waking up to this. England will always still be part Briton/Celtic like the rest of Britain with the country still having Briton/Celtic DNA. The place name "England" may have changed but the people and culture haven't. There are still many place names in England with Briton/Celtic names. We should have an Official Celtic Nations Flag like the rest of Britain
@TRex-dd4ze
7 ай бұрын
Thank you for making this! You are helping us know who we are. There are so many attacks these days by powerful groups trying to deny the existence of anyone with roots in the British Isles, or deny the existence of any natives in Northern Europe or Western Europe or Europe as a whole. Maybe we're mixed a bit between Britons, Celts and Anglo-Saxons in some cases, but our families go back in Britain as far as any other native group anywhere else on the globe, or farther, and there are millions of us and we are the natives of Britain. And many in English-Canada and in the United States and Australia and New Zealand and elsewhere share our blood and heritage. As much as people try to twist it, that's not the same as someone who got off a plane in 2019 or 1982 and still has their country in tact a plane ticket away. Natives do exist. We do exist. We're real.
@GerMFnU1848Sax
Жыл бұрын
We English are Anglo-Saxon-Celtic We are an ethnic group. I will fight anyone opposing this fact
@ChromiumCastle
Жыл бұрын
Texan? Bro you're scots Irish at most meaning 99% Celtic
@GerMFnU1848Sax
Жыл бұрын
@@ChromiumCastle my blood is English and Cornish. I will have the Scots Irish blood too, but I am ethnically Anglo-Celtic, and a Texan
@user-bt2od3yw1b
3 ай бұрын
They invaded, we integrated and are still the Briton/Celtic majority at 65-68% :)
@Males.are.lowest.
2 ай бұрын
English people are mixed with french,irish,italians etc Its why yall brunnete Because french blood Western germans have more anglo saxon blood than any english Its why they blondes I know its hurt you😂 Anyway,pure blooded celts were red head and blue eyed but many of them mixed with italians as well.
@noahtylerpritchett2682
2 жыл бұрын
The Norman onward history is my favorite part of English history. It's Celtic and Anglo-Saxon layers are fascinating too of course. And this. Is fascinating.
@crazychicSHENA
3 ай бұрын
My family on my father's side are 💯❤️ Silures of Irish/Welsh heritage and traditional culture thank you for this "ℹ️ formation 🇺🇸🇮🇪🤍👀🏴🏴
@Males.are.lowest.
2 ай бұрын
Irish and welsh not the same Welsh its brittonic celts and Irish its gaels(goidelic celts)
@jojulida3709
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video !
@celtichistorydecoded
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@philipnorris6542
Жыл бұрын
We Britons tend to think of ourselves as a race apart, but we aren't really.
@noahtylerpritchett2682
2 жыл бұрын
You'll probably love this fact. In December of 2021 genetic studies released on the Celtic migration to Britain around 1000-800 BC
@aynrandish9106
2 жыл бұрын
I got into an online disagreement with someone because I said that the Celts were the indigenous people of Britain. He insisted that the Britons were the indigenous people so I said they were the same thing. I was happy to find this video where you use the words interchangeably. Thanks.
@barnowl5774
Жыл бұрын
I've read that the Celts and Welsh are not the same . Wales apparently has a brythonic language, characteristic of the division of the celtic language that includes Welsh, Cornish and Breton. My Ancestry DNA has me at 73% Welsh and 5% Scottish.
@molecatcher3383
2 жыл бұрын
Around 7000 years ago Celtic culture/people did not exist and did not appear as a distinct people/culture until 1300 BC, at the earliest (The Urnfield Culture of Central Europe, sometimes called Proto-Celtic).
@celtichistorydecoded
2 жыл бұрын
Good point. I meant to say pre-Celtic tribes from Spain
@Gudha_Ismintis
Жыл бұрын
hi - new subscriber question - Were not the Picts and Britons the same genetically, culturally?
@celtichistorydecoded
Жыл бұрын
Good question Noel. They were probably similar but not identical, although we don't know that much about the Picts.
@BETOETE
3 ай бұрын
@@celtichistorydecoded you are Scot, what's your background?
@PortmanRd
2 жыл бұрын
Great Video mate. My surname is classed as old Germanic/English and is very pre-dominant in the East Anglia region. Earliest spelling being Vulnoth or Wulfnoth meaning Wolf Daring or Wolf Brave. But also proud that I was raised in the old kingdom of the Iceni who led a major uprising under Boudicca that came very close to kicking the Romans out of Britain.
@celtichistorydecoded
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Andy61, that's an interesting origin story of your surname
@PortmanRd
2 жыл бұрын
@@celtichistorydecoded My pleasure entirely. Nice to see the forgotten celtic tribes of Britain get a mention. How different these islands could have been if Boudicca had won?
@celtichistorydecoded
2 жыл бұрын
@@PortmanRd How different indeed. Thank you.
@PortmanRd
2 жыл бұрын
@@celtichistorydecoded If you don't know where you've come from you won't know where you're going to.
@dylanmurphy9389
Жыл бұрын
My surname is clearly Irish but I’m 100% English
@billmclaurin6959
Жыл бұрын
The Spanish origin theory has been debunked. The Insular Celts of the British Isles are mostly decended from the Bell Beaker Folk of the early Bronze Age and they came into Britain from Holland. The Bell Beaker Folk replaced most of the Stone Age population and reduced it to around 10% of the total. Very few Continental Celts came to Britain duting the Iron Age, but they did introduce the Celtic language and culture. Only 30% of English DNA is Anglo-Saxon. Like the Scots, Irish and Welsh the English have mostly Bell Beaker DNA.
@argentphoenix11
9 ай бұрын
Bell beakers were based and very Indo-European. Kurgan heritage from the steppe Yamnaya moment with the old gods, Dyaus Phter, the thunder king Perkwunos who was in the film "Morbius". Go to Somerset and tell them that, mate! Cheddar Man's people are nearly entirely extinct, only being preserved in trace percentage in modern british peoples (welsh, saxons, cornish, cornish, scottish, east scottish, angles, manx, theedish) while the indo-european percentage is much higher, with significant amounts of anatolian farmer being brought over with the indo europeans after they mixed with the anatolian farmers on the continent. Good luck convincing a Devonian to tap dance, bob's your uncle!
@gustaf3811
6 ай бұрын
Bell beakers was not genetic distinguishable from other prehistoric europeans and in fact mainland celts migrated to the british ishles in waves multiple times so yes they are celtic indeed.
@redwaldcuthberting7195
2 жыл бұрын
Not say there were no Celtics in what became England as place names like Walton mean 'foreign settlement' from old English wealh 'stranger ,foreigner' and tun 'enclosure, settlement'. Wealh from Proto Germanic * walhaz. Wales is from Englisc from wealas the nominative plural of wealh. Cumberland is named after the Britons, Cumber being related to Cymry and both from ancient British * Combrogi 'country men, compatriots.'
@carlgreene538
Жыл бұрын
Pity we could not go back to those days!
@dave_hoops
2 жыл бұрын
For more info on this try looking at Britain's Hidden History Ross on you tube / website, also try reading Holy Kingdom by A.Gilbert
@mildandbitter
Жыл бұрын
Surely England did not sxist until the English arrived (tribes from NW Europe). Celtic England is an oxymoron. Thuere was nowhere called England until about 927AD..
@celtichistorydecoded
Жыл бұрын
You're right, hence why I said ancient England. Saying England simplifies things however. Everyone knows where England is
@mildandbitter
Жыл бұрын
@@celtichistorydecoded Yes your reasoning is, well, reasonabie. The problem is that modern nations and borders are used to descibe places in times when they did not exist. But I accept that you may have to use them for ease of understanding.
@redwaldcuthberting7195
2 жыл бұрын
There was no 'Celtic ancient England' the name alone means 'Land of the Angles' from Englisc' old English' Engla land thus the title is a misnomer. The word Britain on the other hand is from ancient British * Pritani ancient British being the ancestor of Welsh, Cornish and Breton. It's related to the Goidelic word Cruithne picts', both Pritani and Cruithne are from Proto-Celtic kwritani. The Welsh word for Britain retains the 'p' it's Prydain...
@johnbishop9000
Жыл бұрын
Finally, someone actually speaks sense.
@TheAnglishTimes
2 жыл бұрын
Norman onward is the worst part of English history.
@redwaldcuthberting7195
2 жыл бұрын
For sure, so many Englisc words dropped for Greek and Latin words. It's kind of funny people call English a mongrel language but it's mostly made up of Indo-European daughter tongues. Like Horti in Horticultur is from Latin Hortus 'garden' which is cognate to English yard which is from old English geard 'yey-ard' and before that * gardaz and ultimately from * ghortos in Proto-Indo-European which also gave rise to hortus in Latin by way of Proto-Italic *hortos. Also super, over and hyper are all related... Greed pod is related to English vat, and thermal is to warm.
@ryankellypa
Жыл бұрын
I'm a Campbell on mothers side but can trace back to the Dobunni people who were from England. I wish we knew more about them.
@supermariosionduggan7545
2 жыл бұрын
100% Wales England Cornwall Scotland Isle of Man Ireland are people are mixed Celtic and Anglo Saxon normans Roman Germanic people good place life friendly done ✅
@dylanmurphy9389
Жыл бұрын
We are all brothers
@GerMFnU1848Sax
Жыл бұрын
Remove norman
@aynrandish9106
2 жыл бұрын
It sounds like the Celts/Picts were the indigenous people of Britain. They were there before the Romans, Danes, Saxons and Normans. I wonder how many purely Celtic people are alive today. In the US we say there are still millions of pure native Americans but sadly it isn’t really true. Thanks for the video. I learned something.
@dave_hoops
2 жыл бұрын
For more info on this see Britain's Hidden History website and on KZitem
@noahtylerpritchett2682
2 жыл бұрын
According to 2021 December genetic articles of bronze age genetic migration, Celtic DNA exists in Wales and Ironically England, but is less frequent in Scotland or Ireland.
@georgebodley8068
2 жыл бұрын
Nope all down to migrations
@aynrandish9106
2 жыл бұрын
@@georgebodley8068 Really? Who was there before the Celtic peoples?
@georgebodley8068
2 жыл бұрын
@@aynrandish9106 believe it or not the first recorded migrations happened circa 1500/1600 BC though there were earlier migrations to Britain and beyond its likely the early Britons were here about the end of the ice age going back to the 1500/1600 BC recorded migration of Albyne Albynes daddy was Diocletian the second recorded migration was that if Brutus circa 500BC said to be of Trojan decent along with the lost ten tribes of israel this is not my research but that of two forensic historians Alan Wilson and Baram (tony ) Blackett whom spent MN any years reading the records
@carnmarth1100
Жыл бұрын
Funny to use the words “England and English” when talking about things that pre existed them. Origins of England were around 920 AD. Also, it should be titled the Celtic history of England, Wales and Scotland, these being the current names of the lands described.
@lobolupus2359
2 жыл бұрын
Brasil te ama
@tobyphillips2105
Ай бұрын
Its a shame most English people don't realise they're majority celtic. They see themselves as purely Germanic and dismiss their true history
@allensmith7626
Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately these percentages are no longer correct as your island has been invaded and colonised by Indians for the last 50 years or so.
@colonelturmeric558
Жыл бұрын
Hahahaha, touché
@johnbishop9000
Жыл бұрын
WHAT ARE THE ACTUAL FSCTS OF EVIDENCE THAT PROVE WITHOUT SHADOW OF DOUBT THAT THERE WERE HUMAN SACRIFICES? HEARSEY, ASSUMPTION AND OPINIONS ARE IRRELEVANT, WHAT ARE THE FACTS?
@hoferemil1066
2 жыл бұрын
On My TV Today But Afternoon 6 Clock Because MY Mother
@kevinmurphy65
Жыл бұрын
"Ancient" England? Ancient Britain, yes...England didn't arrive until after the Romans. Still tho' really good vid.
@argentphoenix11
9 ай бұрын
He was referring to the geographical location of England, e.g the parts of Great Britain not claimed by Scotland or Wales.
@supermariosionduggan7545
2 жыл бұрын
I'm know England and Wales and Cornwall Scotland Irish are Celt and Roman and Anglo Saxon forever 100% Celtic Europe and UK and Australia New Zealand Canada
@redwaldcuthberting7195
2 жыл бұрын
Romans left little genetic contribution to Britain. So I wouldn't say we're Roman in the slightest...
@GerMFnU1848Sax
Жыл бұрын
@@Momoa786 go away
@user-mj7yh4ig5m
2 жыл бұрын
The rule that always works in all relationships throughout the ages. In this short video we consider a story that happened in a very interesting time - in times of the Virgin Queen Elizabeth I, whose exceptional reign has been called The Golden Age of England: kzitem.info/news/bejne/t516k6NsgH-nbGU
@hardywatkins7737
Жыл бұрын
7000 years is too old to call them Celts. Probably too old to call them proto-celts also. Bell beaker pottery didn't emerge until 4500 years ago, so i don't know what to call them ... neolithic Iberians i guess?
@shaccooper
2 жыл бұрын
I can’t bear this accent and it’s annoying cadence. Why?
@veronicalogotheti5416
2 жыл бұрын
The invasion was from the vikings 800ac
@GerMFnU1848Sax
Жыл бұрын
@@Momoa786 nobody cares. It's our history not yours. We English are Anglo-Saxon-Celtic. I have dark blond hair and blue eyes. You will not deny me my Germanic blood
@Males.are.lowest.
2 ай бұрын
@@GerMFnU1848Saxyou not anglo saxon Western germans have more saxon blood than any english😂
@veronicalogotheti5416
2 жыл бұрын
There was no invasion The frissians went to england in 400 ac
@ivandinsmore6217
2 жыл бұрын
Why is this video done in a very obviously fake Scottish accent?
@simonpayne8252
2 ай бұрын
Celtic loosely means western european. Its a lazy blanket term that many people use incorrectly because the greeks dubbed the people of western europe as Keltoi.
@hoferemil1066
2 жыл бұрын
Wants To Go Outside
@georgebodley8068
2 жыл бұрын
No Celts in Britain old son read professor Graham Robb the ancient paths and professor John collis the Celts origins. Myths and inventions
@legolasgreenleaf1961
2 жыл бұрын
Excellent point George! Apparently John was ridiculed for suggesting this, but academia will not accept the facts that the celts resided in southern Gaul near the Alps, recorded by the Romans themselves. When Caesar tried unsuccessfully to invade Britain twice, he remarked how the British still used chariots in warfare, a custom not used since the trojan era. Interesting as the British for over 2000 yrs were well aware of their trojan and kymric heritage. Every king of Britain had to claim descent from Brutus. Its astonishing that its all been replaced by a babaric 'celtic' narrative. Even the origins of Mercia are not acknowledged, 166,000 'Affricans' pouring into the midlands? Gormund was the Vandal leader in Ireland, having been kicked out of north Africa by Belisarius, he led the people north to Ireland, before crossing over to Britain around 547-8ad on invitation by the Saxons. Within 150 years Mercia becomes the largest, most powerfull kingdom in the new England. As they switched allegiances from helping Saxon against Briton, they then help the Britons against the Angles of northumbria. Mercinaries essentially initially, before carving out the kingdom of Mercia. Much later Mercia and Wessex merged through politics and marriage. Lloegria from the 7th century onward, eventually became England.
@noahtylerpritchett2682
2 жыл бұрын
Literally, I mean fucking Literally, In December of 2021 genetic articles released of a Celtic migration from 1000-800 BC Celtic migration into Britain from France of Gallic related dna came to Britain. So quite your migration model. Ok so we were wrong on the traditional "hallstatt 500s BC migration" happened earlier, big deal
@legolasgreenleaf1961
2 жыл бұрын
@@noahtylerpritchett2682 i suppose the big deal is really that now we can look at our traditional histories with some pride. If people were on to the middle eastern and egyptian link 150 years ago, you have to wonder why we've been taken to hallstadt since then. Its a theory with no foundation, which is the problem with relying on archaeology - digging up a pot there and finding a similar one in britain, shouldnt mean we throw our entire remembered history in the bin. If the hieroglyphs can now be read confidently using the ancient welsh language, it certainly is a big deal! Somehow i dont think Mr Wilson will be getting a nobel prize though!!
@chrisjordon864
Жыл бұрын
@@legolasgreenleaf1961 so who is changing the narrative and why would they.
@legolasgreenleaf1961
Жыл бұрын
@@chrisjordon864 it seems to be something that has dragged on and gathered pace, certainly over the last 1-200 years. Starting initially from the coming of the hanoverians, then to trying to erradicate the welsh language in the 19th century, to the celtic theories of our modern times essentially consigning our original histories to the dustbin. Yet a positive examination of the records shows that these histories have substance and are corroborated with masses of evidence. It does seem odd that the great royal dynasties of the britons in england with all their acheivements against rome for example, are simply not celebrated. If its roman or norman its promoted, if its british.... it doesnt matter.
@andrewwhelan7311
2 жыл бұрын
The ancient Cymry . Welsh share the same DNA with tutenkamun and can be traced back to Syria Egypt and later Troy via ancient migrations. There are no Celts in Britain. This DNA can be traced as far back as the end of the last ice age. Their language can be used to decipher hieroglyphics.See Cymroglyphics on u tube.
@georgebodley8068
2 жыл бұрын
Quite right
@redwaldcuthberting7195
2 жыл бұрын
King Tut is said to be R1B which isn't exclusive to the Welsh.
@andrewwhelan7311
2 жыл бұрын
@@redwaldcuthberting7195 Yes agreed.But the DNA and language similarities can be traced along the ancient migration routes east to west. This supports the ancient British origin stories same as the Irish/ Scots.
@MarioAlejandro-sb3du
Ай бұрын
Bullocks
@Anglo-Saxon-96
11 ай бұрын
Germanic England 🏴
@Males.are.lowest.
2 ай бұрын
English people are mixed with french,irish,italians etc Its why yall brunnete Because french blood Western germans have more anglo saxon blood than any english Its why they blondes I know its hurt you😂 Anyway,pure blooded celts were red head and blue eyed but many of them mixed with italians as well.
@Anglo-Saxon-96
11 ай бұрын
We English are Anglo Saxon decent not Celtic and i thank woden for that 🏴🤣🖕🏻
@AthelstansSuccessor
5 ай бұрын
We're a mix of both you tosser
@user-bt2od3yw1b
3 ай бұрын
No we are Briton/Celtic DNA with a mix of Anglo-Saxon like the rest of Britain. The place name "England" may have changed but the people and culture haven't. There are still many place names in England with Briton/Celtic names. We should have an Official Celtic Nations Flag like the rest of Britain
@Males.are.lowest.
2 ай бұрын
English people are mixed with french,irish,italians etc Its why yall brunnete Because french blood Western germans have more anglo saxon blood than any english Its why they blondes I know its hurt you😂 Anyway,pure blooded celts were red head and blue eyed but many of them mixed with italians as well.😂😂😂😂
@Males.are.lowest.
2 ай бұрын
@@user-bt2od3yw1benglish people mixed with romans and french Western germans real saxons😂.
Пікірлер: 142