The #1 reason for Arri LogC3 is to give newer filmmakers access to the Arri Log-to-Log workflow, technical LUTs and 80+ look LUTs. Log-to-log is a very efficient process and we think newer filmmakers will love it.
@GrenlandUnderVann
2 ай бұрын
So the GH7 is like a gateway drug to Arri.
@CineD
2 ай бұрын
Very good point indeed!
@sabymondal
2 ай бұрын
Would LOVE to see the dynamic range lab test for Canon C400 !!! 🫡
@danhundley
2 ай бұрын
Yes, the Canon Cine-Servo 17-120mm supports DUAL PIXEL AUTOFOCUS!
@grahamesheldon1487
2 ай бұрын
Oops - thank you!
@RayValdezPhotography
2 ай бұрын
I wonder if canon is just recycling the slots from the r5 and r3 to save money
@mousbleu
2 ай бұрын
Your podcast was super pleasing to listen to from the POV of a video enthusiast waiting for the R5II. Thanks.
@CineD
2 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@williamburkholder769
2 ай бұрын
As a Lumix user, the look of the body is absolutely irrelevant to me. What is highly relevant is the ergonomic design of the body. All the controls have been where we expected them since the GH4. The GH6 was highly evolved as a body from that ergonomic standpoint. What it needed more than anything is the PDAF hybrid AF system. What we get is that PLUS best in class stabilization, downloadable LUTS, 32-bit float, INTERNAL raw recording, USB to SSD recording, Arri LogC3, and so many other niceties that other brands have yet to include in their hybrid cameras. What they have built is a "disposable" B-camera for filmmakers. For the rest of us, it's all the camera we need for most of our stills and video in a form that travels well because the lenses are SMALL.
@buckeroonii
2 ай бұрын
Give me the same body same controls all day, maybe a few more buttons but keeping the controls and accessories between models is highly desirable
@juliusherth
2 ай бұрын
its time for 2 identical type b cards. reasoning behind that is offload speed. imagine how much time you could safe day by day.
@grahamesheldon1487
2 ай бұрын
So many manufacturers aren’t doing that though. I wonder why?
@PANAFRAZER
2 ай бұрын
Hey guys, the internal ProResRaw is 12bit
@108u9
2 ай бұрын
Hi can you guys add 4:5 crop for stills in the next firmware update? Was surprised this doesn’t come stock! Also any idea why the digital zoom feature from the S9 isn’t available on the GH7? Thank you!
@EmeraldAudiovisual
2 ай бұрын
@@108u9 Huh ? Can you elaborate, which feature, you're talking about ?
@GrenlandUnderVann
2 ай бұрын
Useless. Doesn't work with Davinci Resolve. Could you please fix this with Black Magic Design?
@PhotoVideoTechOz
2 ай бұрын
@@GrenlandUnderVannno other brands cameras or recorders record blackmagic “raw”, so maybe complain to BMD about choosing to not support it.
@GrenlandUnderVann
2 ай бұрын
@@PhotoVideoTechOz So Panny boy wants me to switch to Apple stuff to be able to edit this ProRes RAW?
@NikCan66
2 ай бұрын
Excellent video
@grahamesheldon1487
2 ай бұрын
Aw, thanks! We have fun.
@nyambe
2 ай бұрын
Wish the GH7 was a box camera. Talking M3/4 in 2024 is wind to me as MarkBone said. It feels like both Canon and Panasonic a feeling the pressure of Sony taking over market share.
@iconoclast6994
2 ай бұрын
Wait, what? This is a repeat? With a different title? 😮
@michaelgromann1804
2 ай бұрын
16:41 Complaint: identical slots means redundancy, which is essential for paid jobs. Years ago using the C100 I lost 1 SD-card during an important interview shot, but I could continue because of dual slot recording.
@CineD
2 ай бұрын
My thinking exactly :-) Nino
@ShaneVanLitz
2 ай бұрын
Great video, having used one for years I'm not sure how the C500mkii has better anamorphic with it's physcally 17:9 size sensor though. It does not have an open gate mode that I've found.
@grahamesheldon1487
2 ай бұрын
Hi there! You can do 4:3 and 6:5 sensor modes in Canon RAW as of the 2021 firmware update!
@ShaneVanLitz
2 ай бұрын
@@grahamesheldon1487 Oh I see, yes, neither of those modes are full frame, they're S35 cropped and worse for the final image when working with large format lenses but easier to work with on set. Sorry for the confusion.
@avdcam
Ай бұрын
@@ShaneVanLitz I think it's important to note too, like you said, that the sensor on the c500 mark II is 17:9, but it looks like there is about 200-300 vertical pixels not in use. And even the 4:3 modes do not extend into those unused pixels. While the C400 has nearly 1200 pixels not in use vertically, since it's a 2/3 sensor inside the c400, so Canon might be able to release a real full frame open gate mode at some point.
@ShaneVanLitz
Ай бұрын
@@avdcam Agreed.
@DKP3000
2 ай бұрын
Pyxis 6K vs C400 shootout?
@kudobeats
2 ай бұрын
never seen a camera with 300fps in that price range? The GH6 and G9ii...?
@GrenlandUnderVann
2 ай бұрын
I can't edit ProRes RAW in Davinci Resolve. Basically only Apples own Final Cut Pro supports this.
@skepsys
2 ай бұрын
no dual iso and no bsi sensor in gh7. in 2024... the very day (?) c400 introduced 3 (three) base iso's. in a full frame. and in a bsi sensor. mft apparently does too well in low light to bother with bsi or dual.
@Behrdie
2 ай бұрын
It's still a dual gain sensor right? That's just a different approach compared to dual base iso.
@PhotoVideoTechOz
2 ай бұрын
😂 it is bsi, and it does havedual iso circuits it just uses both 90% of the time, that how dr boost works. Maybe check those DR tests on the C400 and compare independent ISO. Maybe wait for cineD latitude and dr tests as we know some manufacturers love to claim ridiculous DR numbers.
@skepsys
2 ай бұрын
i dont think it is bsi. it's the same sensor as in g9ii. about the dual, i was interested in noise. what i know is that with dual iso there's clearly an iso at which noise is significantly reduced. i havent seen this to be the case in what i watched on the g9ii, gh6 or gh7 (someone told me "photons to photos" site noticed an improvement in dynamic range at 3200 in g9ii, but it's quite minimal from what i see). it has dual gain output, ok, but the noise is still creeping up steadily from one iso value to the other, so if i'm in a low light environment, it helps to be able to suddenly improve noise at say 4000
@skepsys
2 ай бұрын
later edit.. i saw that panasonic uk does list it as bsi sensor quite clearly. so, my bad. my apology. it is bsi.
@tresderan10
2 ай бұрын
i cannot stand the praise about gh7 that nobody buys like gh6 .. i bought a gh5 and my disappoint has been total every time i use it ,. i repent.. gh7 has lower tch than a A7SIII after 4 years.. and who cares about pro res.. if the sensor is outdated? i guess. S5 which is the only one camera to buy from panasonic ... coudl have been replaced with a very capable one.. but they don't.. canon just does a far better job and no ownder.. and the R5 mark II it will be amazing.. why spending on panasonic a camaera that in one year time is already useless. as for the market today? i don't get it.. and i hate my gh5 so much for worst image quality ever.. and artifacts.. and low light.. come on... only the ibis is good..
@tresderan10
2 ай бұрын
welcome C400 and bye bye gh system .. so outdated.. panasonic should stop prepping old systems...
Пікірлер: 42