Shoutout to Kollin7, he's one to watch for sure...
@retro-meister
3 ай бұрын
honestly those clowns running the rankings havent a clue claydol is the goat #1 in adv
@hodanisbased4980
2 ай бұрын
Claydol is a really nice mon. It's not particularly interesting imo, but it's just nice. A rock resist, spike immunity, and removal all in one. You'll never feel overwhelmed by a Claydol, but there are a massive variety of teams that are possible because of the unique tools it has to offer
@avansies
3 ай бұрын
this kollin guy really does know his stuff unlike yourdagan
@stetsonstarkey
2 ай бұрын
So glad I just discovered this channel. Looking forward to a lot of great gen 3 uploads. Gen 3 is seeing a real resurgence these days
@harryclement-jones3005
3 ай бұрын
You spin me right round, baby, right round Like a record, baby, right round, round, round
@Phil7_
3 ай бұрын
Another great Kollin7 analysis!
@lam9001
3 ай бұрын
nobody grinds like kollin 🔥 😮
@SockABusta
3 ай бұрын
Excellent video.
@purplesocks3200
3 ай бұрын
all dolled up!
@xtinaxendrix
3 ай бұрын
ur a clay doll
@Zpanther19
3 ай бұрын
The claydol offense goat!!
@jacoblong9
3 ай бұрын
Awesome analysis, super excited to see your thoughts on other meta pokemon!
@AC__PC
3 ай бұрын
Goat like Kollin coming in with the great info.
@yourdagan
3 ай бұрын
You use "one-time" a lot here in reference to Claydol, and it's that lack of longevity in addition to the severe 6 stats syndrome it has that has me personally down on Claydol. If I'm using Claydol, I'd want the Refresh. I go even further and be full-special with HP Fire to win the Spikes war (Misdreavus notwithstanding). Like Flygon, I feel its rumblings reputation for mediocrity is deserved---at least insofar as people have tried to stay middle-of-the-road with the sets commonly in usage, instead of trying more extreme measures intended to bruteforce real niches for them. As far as fast and hard-hitting Claydol is concerned, that's well outside the range of my building habits. I suppose in theory the core 4 or so mons you mentioned for it has merit, but I'd need to see more elaboration to be convinced of it.
Пікірлер: 15